Abatacept Intravenous

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abatacept Intravenous Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy Effective Date ........................................... 1/1/2021 Next Review Date ......................................... 1/1/2022 Coverage Policy Number ............................... M0006 Abatacept Intravenous Table of Contents Related Coverage Resources Overview .............................................................. 1 Immunomodulators – Oral and Subcutaneous Coverage Policy ................................................... 1 (Employer Group Benefit Plans) FDA Approved Indications ................................... 2 Immunomodulators – Oral and Subcutaneous Recommended Dosing ........................................ 3 (Individual and Family Plans) General Background ............................................ 4 Coding/ Billing Information ................................... 6 References .......................................................... 7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE The following Coverage Policy applies to health benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Certain Cigna Companies and/or lines of business only provide utilization review services to clients and do not make coverage determinations. References to standard benefit plan language and coverage determinations do not apply to those clients. Coverage Policies are intended to provide guidance in interpreting certain standard benefit plans administered by Cigna Companies. Please note, the terms of a customer’s particular benefit plan document [Group Service Agreement, Evidence of Coverage, Certificate of Coverage, Summary Plan Description (SPD) or similar plan document] may differ significantly from the standard benefit plans upon which these Coverage Policies are based. For example, a customer’s benefit plan document may contain a specific exclusion related to a topic addressed in a Coverage Policy. In the event of a conflict, a customer’s benefit plan document always supersedes the information in the Coverage Policies. In the absence of a controlling federal or state coverage mandate, benefits are ultimately determined by the terms of the applicable benefit plan document. Coverage determinations in each specific instance require consideration of 1) the terms of the applicable benefit plan document in effect on the date of service; 2) any applicable laws/regulations; 3) any relevant collateral source materials including Coverage Policies and; 4) the specific facts of the particular situation. Coverage Policies relate exclusively to the administration of health benefit plans. Coverage Policies are not recommendations for treatment and should never be used as treatment guidelines. In certain markets, delegated vendor guidelines may be used to support medical necessity and other coverage determinations. Overview This coverage policy addresses the use of intravenous abatacept (Orencia®). The use of subcutaneous abatacept is addressed in separate coverage policies [Immunomodulators – Oral and Subcutaneous (Employer Group Benefit Plans) and Immunomodulators – Oral and Subcutaneous (Individual and Family Plans)]. Please refer to the related coverage policy link above. Coverage Policy Abatacept intravenous (Orencia®) is considered medically necessary when any of the following criteria are met: • Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (PJIA) and BOTH of the following: o Individual is 6 years of age or older o Prescribed by, or in consultation with a rheumatologist or a prescriber who specializes in PJIA • Psoriatic arthritis and BOTH of the following: Page 1 of 7 Medical Benefit Injectable Clinical Criteria: M006 o Documented failure or inadequate response, contraindication per FDA label, intolerance, or not a candidate for ONE disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (for example, methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine)† † NOTE: An exception to this requirement can be made if the individual has already tried a biologic. These individuals are not required to “step back” and try a DMARD o Prescribed by or in consultation with a rheumatologist, dermatologist or a prescriber who specializes in psoriatic arthritis • Rheumatoid arthritis and BOTH of the following: o Documented failure or inadequate response, contraindication per FDA label, intolerance, or not a candidate for ONE disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (for example, methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine)† † NOTE: An exception to this requirement can be made if the individual has already tried a biologic. These individuals are not required to “step back” and try a conventional synthetic DMARD o Prescribed by or in consultation with a rheumatologist or a prescriber who specializes in rheumatoid arthritis Coverage for abatacept intravenous (Orencia) varies across plans. Refer to the customer’s benefit plan document for coverage details. Where coverage requires the use of preferred products, the following criteria apply. For Employer Group Benefit Plans and Individual and Family Plans: Documented failure or inadequate response, contraindication per FDA label, intolerance, or not a candidate for TWO self-administered immunomodulators Initial authorization is up to 12 months. Abatacept intravenous (Orencia) is considered medically necessary for continued use when the individual has had a positive response to abatcept intravenous. Reauthorization for up to 12 months. When coverage is available and medically necessary, the dosage, frequency, duration of therapy, and site of care should be reasonable, clinically appropriate, and supported by evidence-based literature and adjusted based upon severity, alternative available treatments, and previous response to therapy. Abatacept intravenous (Orencia) is considered experimental, investigational or unproven for ANY other use including the following: • Concomitant use with any other biologic including all non-tumor necrosis factor (non-TNF) biologics, anti-TNF biologics, or oral immunomodulatory agents (for example, Otezla or Xeljanz/ Xeljanz XR) • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) • Inflammatory Bowel Disease (i.e., Crohn’s Disease [CD], Ulcerative Colitis [UC]) • Psoriasis Note: Receipt of sample product does not satisfy any criteria requirements for coverage. FDA Approved Indications Adult Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Orencia is indicated for reducing signs and symptoms, inducing major clinical response, inhibiting the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis. Orencia may be used as monotherapy or concomitantly with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. Page 2 of 7 Medical Benefit Injectable Clinical Criteria: M006 Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Orencia is indicated for reducing signs and symptoms in patients 2 years of age and older with moderately to severely active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Orencia may be used as monotherapy or concomitantly with methotrexate (MTX). Adult Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Orencia is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Important Limitations of Use Orencia should not be administered concomitantly with TNF antagonists. Orencia is not recommended for use concomitantly with other biologic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy, such as anakinra. Recommended Dosing FDA Recommended Dosing Indication FDA Recommended Dosing Adult For adult patients with RA, Orencia may be administered as an intravenous infusion or as a Rheumatoid subcutaneous injection. Orencia may be used as monotherapy or concomitantly with DMARDs Arthritis other than TNF antagonists. (RA) Intravenous Dosing Regimen Orencia lyophilized powder should be reconstituted and administered after dilution as a 30- minute intravenous infusion utilizing the weight range based dosing specified in the package insert. Following the initial intravenous administration, an intravenous infusion should be given at 2 and 4 weeks after the first infusion and every 4 weeks thereafter. Dose of Orencia for Intravenous Infusion in Adult RA Patients Body Weight Dose Number of Vials Less than 60 kg 500 mg 2 60 to 100 kg 750 mg 3 More than 100 kg 1000 mg 4 Each vial provides 250 mg of abatacept for administration. Subcutaneous Dosing Regimen Orencia 125 mg in prefilled syringes or in Orenica ClickJect autoinjector should be administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly and may be initiated with or without an intravenous loading dose. For patients initiating therapy with an intravenous loading dose, Orencia should be initiated with a single intravenous infusion (as per body weight categories listed in Table 1), followed by the first 125 mg subcutaneous injection administered within a day of the intravenous infusion. Patients transitioning from Orencia intravenous therapy to subcutaneous administration should administer the first subcutaneous dose instead of the next scheduled intravenous dose. Juvenile For patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), Orencia may be administered as an Idiopathic intravenous infusion (6 years of age and older) or a subcutaneous injection (2 years of age and Arthritis older). Intravenous dosing has not been studied in patients younger than 6 years of age. Orencia may be used as monotherapy or concomitantly with methotrexate. Intravenous Dosing Regimen Orencia should be administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion based on body weight. Pediatric patients with: • body weight less than 75 kg should be administered Orencia at a dose of 10 mg/kg Page 3 of 7 Medical Benefit Injectable
Recommended publications
  • Intravenous Therapy Procedure Manual
    INTRAVENOUS THERAPY PROCEDURE MANUAL - 1 - LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE __________________________________________ hereby approves (Facility) the attached Reference Manual as of _____________________. (Date) The Intravenous Therapy Procedure Manual will be reviewed at least annually or more often when deemed appropriate. Revisions will be reviewed as they occur. Current copies of the Intravenous Therapy Procedure Manual shall be maintained at each appropriate nursing station. I have reviewed this manual and agree to its approval. __________________________ (Administrator) __________________________ (Director of Nursing) __________________________ (Medical Director) - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. Purpose 1 B. Local Standard of Practice 1 RESPONSIBILITIES A. Responsibilities: M Chest Pharmacy 1 B. Responsibilities: Administrator 1 C. Responsibilities: Director of Nursing Services (DON/DNS) 1 D. Skills Validation 2 AMENDMENTS GUIDELINES A. Resident Candidacy for IV Therapy 1 B. Excluded IV Medications and Therapies 1 C. Processing the IV Order 1 D. IV Solutions/Medications: Storage 2 E. IV Solutions/Medications: Handling 3 F. IV Solutions and Supplies: Destroying and Returning 4 G. IV Tubing 5 H. Peripheral IV Catheters and Needles 6 I. Central Venous Devices 7 J. Documentation and Monitoring 8 K. IV Medication Administration Times 9 L. Emergency IV Supplies 10 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PROTOCOLS A. IV Antibiotic 1 1. Purpose 2. Guidelines 3. Nursing Responsibilities B. IV Push 2 1. Purpose 2. Guidelines C. Anaphylaxis Allergic Reaction 4 1. Purpose 2. Guidelines 3. Nursing Responsibilities and Interventions 4. Signs and Symptoms of Anaphylaxis 5. Drugs Used to Treat Anaphylaxis 6. Physician Protocol PRACTICE GUIDELINES A. Purpose 1 B. Personnel 1 C. Competencies 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Public Assessment Report for Abatacept (Rch)
    Australian Public Assessment Report for Abatacept (rch) Proprietary Product Name: Orencia Sponsor: Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia Pty Ltd June 2011 About the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) · The TGA is a division of the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, and is responsible for regulating medicines and medical devices. · TGA administers the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act), applying a risk management approach designed to ensure therapeutic goods supplied in Australia meet acceptable standards of quality, safety and efficacy (performance), when necessary. · The work of the TGA is based on applying scientific and clinical expertise to decision- making, to ensure that the benefits to consumers outweigh any risks associated with the use of medicines and medical devices. · The TGA relies on the public, healthcare professionals and industry to report problems with medicines or medical devices. TGA investigates reports received by it to determine any necessary regulatory action. · To report a problem with a medicine or medical device, please see the information on the TGA website. About AusPARs · An Australian Public Assessment Record (AusPAR) provides information about the evaluation of a prescription medicine and the considerations that led the TGA to approve or not approve a prescription medicine submission. · AusPARs are prepared and published by the TGA. · An AusPAR is prepared for submissions that relate to new chemical entities, generic medicines, major variations, and extensions of indications. · An AusPAR is a static document, in that it will provide information that relates to a submission at a particular point in time. · A new AusPAR will be developed to reflect changes to indications and/or major variations to a prescription medicine subject to evaluation by the TGA.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0209462 A1 Bilotti Et Al
    US 20170209462A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0209462 A1 Bilotti et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 27, 2017 (54) BTK INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS FOR Publication Classification TREATING MULTIPLE MYELOMA (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: Pharmacyclics LLC, Sunnyvale, CA A 6LX 3/573 (2006.01) A69/20 (2006.01) (US) A6IR 9/00 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Elizabeth Bilotti, Sunnyvale, CA (US); A69/48 (2006.01) Thorsten Graef, Los Altos Hills, CA A 6LX 3/59 (2006.01) (US) A63L/454 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC .......... A61 K3I/573 (2013.01); A61K 3 1/519 (21) Appl. No.: 15/252,385 (2013.01); A61 K3I/454 (2013.01); A61 K 9/0053 (2013.01); A61K 9/48 (2013.01); A61 K (22) Filed: Aug. 31, 2016 9/20 (2013.01) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein are pharmaceutical combinations, dosing Related U.S. Application Data regimen, and methods of administering a combination of a (60) Provisional application No. 62/212.518, filed on Aug. BTK inhibitor (e.g., ibrutinib), an immunomodulatory agent, 31, 2015. and a steroid for the treatment of a hematologic malignancy. US 2017/0209462 A1 Jul. 27, 2017 BTK INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS FOR Subject in need thereof comprising administering pomalido TREATING MULTIPLE MYELOMA mide, ibrutinib, and dexamethasone, wherein pomalido mide, ibrutinib, and dexamethasone are administered con CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED currently, simulataneously, and/or co-administered. APPLICATION 0008. In some aspects, provided herein is a method of treating a hematologic malignancy in a subject in need 0001. This application claims the benefit of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3
    CURRICULUM CLINICAL BASE / CA-1 / CA-2 / CA-3 ANESTHESIOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND CORE COMPETENCIES Department of Anesthesiology University of Missouri at Kansas City School of Medicine Saint Luke’s Hospital Truman Medical Center Children’s Mercy Hospital Revised 2011 Table of Contents Pages Introduction – Statement of Curriculum ................................................................................................................... 3 I. Rendering Patient Insensible to Pain ............................................................................................................. 4-10 II. Support of Life Functions ............................................................................................................................. 11-16 III. Clinical Base Year A. Cardiology ................................................................................................................................................. 17-32 B. Emergency Medicine ................................................................................................................................. 33-44 C. General Medicine ....................................................................................................................................... 45-49 D. Infectious Disease ...................................................................................................................................... 50-59 E. Nephrology ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotine Patches Appear Safe for CAD Patients
    May 1, 2007 • www.internalmedicinenews.com Cardiovascular Medicine 37 Nicotine Patches Appear Safe for CAD Patients BY BRUCE JANCIN 30%, but many physicians have been re- induced myocardial defect on single-photon ment arm jumped from 10.9 to 25.2 Denver Bureau luctant to recommend it for their patients emission computed tomography (SPECT) ng/mL, Dr. Leja said. After 1 week, patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) be- to receive either 21-mg nicotine patches or were encouraged to quit smoking while N EW O RLEANS — Nicotine patches cause nicotine is known to increase heart placebo in addition to continuing their usu- continuing to use their assigned patches. are safe for use in smokers with known rate and blood pressure, and can induce al amount of cigarette smoking. The pri- Upon SPECT imaging at week 4, the coronary artery disease and stress-induced vasoconstriction as well, Dr. Monika J. Leja mary end point of the study was change in size of the perfusion defects in the nico- myocardial ischemia, according to the re- reported at the annual scientific session of total perfusion defect size upon repeat stress tine patch group remained unchanged sults of the first-ever randomized, place- the American College of Cardiology. SPECT imaging performed at 1 week. from baseline, although their plasma nico- bo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial to Dr. Leja and her coinvestigators at the There was no change in the total or is- tine levels remained as high as at week 1. examine this issue. Methodist DeBakey Heart Center in Hous- chemic perfusion defect size, compared The trial was supported by Glaxo- Nicotine replacement therapy doubles ton randomized 55 heavy smokers with with baseline, in either group even though SmithKline Consumer Healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    Abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis Information for the public Published: TBC nice.org.uk What has NICE said? Abatacept (Orencia), adalimumab (Humira), etanercept (Enbrel) and tocilizumab (RoActemra) are recommended as possible treatments for people with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Adalimumab and etanercept are recommended as possible treatments for people with enthesitis- related juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Etanercept is recommended as a possible treatment for people with psoriatic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. What does this mean? If your (or your child's) doctor thinks that abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept or tocilizumab are the right treatment, you (or your child) should be able to have the treatment on the NHS. Abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab should be available on the NHS within 3 months of the guidance being issued. If you (or your child) are not eligible for treatment as described above, you (or your child) should be able to continue taking abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept or tocilizumab until you and your (or your child's) doctor decide it is the right time to stop. © NICE TBC. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 3 Abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis Why has NICE said this? NICE looks at how well treatments work in relation to how much they cost compared with other treatments available on the NHS. Abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab were recommended because the benefits to patients justify their cost. The condition and the treatments Arthritis causes pain and inflammation in joints. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a type of arthritis that starts in people younger than 16 years (juvenile).
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARISON of the WHO ATC CLASSIFICATION & Ephmra/Intellus Worldwide ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION
    COMPARISON OF THE WHO ATC CLASSIFICATION & EphMRA/Intellus Worldwide ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION: VERSION June 2019 2 Comparison of the WHO ATC Classification and EphMRA / Intellus Worldwide Anatomical Classification The following booklet is designed to improve the understanding of the two classification systems. The development of the two systems had previously taken place separately. EphMRA and WHO are now working together to ensure that there is a convergence of the 2 systems rather than a divergence. In order to better understand the two classification systems, we should pay attention to the way in which substances/products are classified. WHO mainly classifies substances according to the therapeutic or pharmaceutical aspects and in one class only (particular formulations or strengths can be given separate codes, e.g. clonidine in C02A as antihypertensive agent, N02C as anti-migraine product and S01E as ophthalmic product). EphMRA classifies products, mainly according to their indications and use. Therefore, it is possible to find the same compound in several classes, depending on the product, e.g., NAPROXEN tablets can be classified in M1A (antirheumatic), N2B (analgesic) and G2C if indicated for gynaecological conditions only. The purposes of classification are also different: The main purpose of the WHO classification is for international drug utilisation research and for adverse drug reaction monitoring. This classification is recommended by the WHO for use in international drug utilisation research. The EphMRA/Intellus Worldwide classification has a primary objective to satisfy the marketing needs of the pharmaceutical companies. Therefore, a direct comparison is sometimes difficult due to the different nature and purpose of the two systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Intravenous Infusion Drug Administration: Flushing Guidance
    Intravenous Infusion Drug Administration: Flushing Guidance April 2019 Acknowledgements: Andrew Barton – Author/reviewer NIVAS Chair Advanced Nurse Practitioner, IV Therapy and Vascular Access Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Tim Jackson – Reviewer/contributor, NIVAS Board Deputy Chair Consultant in Anesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine Calderdale & Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust Gemma Oliver - Reviewer/contributor NIVAS Board Nurse Consultant, Integrated IV Care East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Nicola York - Reviewer/contributor NIVAS Board Clinical Nurse Manager Vascular Access and Nutrition support Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Matt Jones - Reviewer/contributor NIVAS Board Consultant Anaesthetist East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Steve Hill - Reviewer/contributor NIVAS Board Procedural Team Manger The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Marie Woodley - Reviewer/contributor NIVAS Board Clinical Nurse Specialist IV therapy/OPAT Lead Buckinghamshire Healthcare Trust Contents: Introduction………………………………………………………………………… Page 1 Methods of administering intravenous therapy………………………………… Page 2 Intravenous bolus injection…………………………………………….… Page 2 Continuous, variable dose syringe driver injection……………………. Page 2 Intravenous infusion…………………………………………………….… Page 3 Option 1: Discarding the infusion set………………………………….… Page 3 Option 2: Flushing the Infusion set manually…………………………... Page 4 Option 3: Flushing the infusion set with a closed system…………….. Page 4 General Guidance…………………………………………………………………. Page 5 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Treatment with Abatacept Plus Methotrexate for Disease Flare After Complete Treatment Withdrawal in Patients with Early Rheum
    Rheumatoid arthritis RMD Open: first published as 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000840 on 8 February 2019. Downloaded from ORIGINAL ARTICLE Re-treatment with abatacept plus methotrexate for disease flare after complete treatment withdrawal in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from the AVERT study Paul Emery,1,2 Gerd R Burmester,3 Vivian P Bykerk,4 Bernard G Combe,5 Daniel E Furst,6 Michael A Maldonado,7 Tom WJ Huizinga8 To cite: Emery P, Burmester GR, ABSTRACT Bykerk VP, et al. Re- Objectives To complete reporting of outcomes after total Key messages treatment with abatacept withdrawal of all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy and re- plus methotrexate for disease treatment after flare inA ssessing Very Early Rheumatoid What is already known about this subject? flare after complete treatment arthritis Treatment study (NCT01142726). ► Abatacept in combination with methotrexate induc- withdrawal in patients with es remission more often than methotrexate alone early rheumatoid arthritis: Methods Patients with early RA were initially randomised to double-blind, weekly subcutaneous abatacept plus after 12 months of treatment, with a greater propor- 2-year results from the tion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) main- AVERT study. methotrexate, or abatacept or methotrexate monotherapy. RMD Open taining remission over 6 months following treatment 2019;5:e000840. doi:10.1136/ At month 12, patients with Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 rmdopen-2018-000840 C reactive protein (CRP) <3.2 had all RA treatments rapidly withdrawal. withdrawn and were observed for ≤12 months or until What does this study add? flare.A fter ≥3 months’ withdrawal, patients with protocol- ► Prepublication history and ► These final results of theA ssessing Very Early additional material for this defined RA flare received open-label abatacept plus Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment (AVERT) study paper are available in online.
    [Show full text]
  • Intravenous Therapytherapy
    IntravenousIntravenous TherapyTherapy Department of EMS Professions Temple College IVIV TherapyTherapy OverviewOverview I DefinitionsDefinitions && IndicationsIndications I FluidFluid ResuscitationResuscitation I EquipmentEquipment andand SuppliesSupplies I ChoosingChoosing FluidsFluids andand CathetersCatheters I ProcedureProcedure andand TechniqueTechnique TipsTips – Peripheral Venipuncture – Intraosseous Access I PotentialPotential ComplicationsComplications DefinitionsDefinitions I IVIV // VenipunctureVenipuncture I CrystalloidsCrystalloids I PeripheralPeripheral // CentralCentral I ColloidsColloids I IntraosseousIntraosseous AccessAccess I HypertonicHypertonic I FluidFluid ResuscitationResuscitation I IsotonicIsotonic I MedicationMedication AccessAccess I DripDrip RatesRates I KVOKVO // TKOTKO IndicationsIndications forfor VenipunctureVenipuncture I VolumeVolume I VenousVenous AccessAccess toto – Dehydration CirculationCirculation I Water – Blood collection I Electrolytes I Labs – Blood Loss I Field Chemistry I Colloids – Medication I Crystalloids Administration FluidFluid ResuscitationResuscitation I DehydrationDehydration andand I ShockShock VolumeVolume LossLoss ManagementManagement – Replace Lost Fluid or – Controversial Blood – Definitive therapy = – Often requires 2 -3 Surgery and blood times the amount replacement lost (2:1 rule) – EMS → judicious replacement – Improve end organ perfusion (BP at 90 - 100 mm Hg) EquipmentEquipment andand SuppliesSupplies I FluidsFluids I SuppliesSupplies – Normal Saline – IV Catheters (0.9%
    [Show full text]
  • Intravenous Medicine Administration Self-Directed Learning Package
    Acute Services Division Practice Development Department Intravenous Medicine Administration Self-directed Learning Package Margaret A. Connolly Katherine Hill Lynne Robertson Debbie Thompson Pinky Virhia First published August 2007 Revised July 2014 For review July 2016 Contribution by Christina Ronyane © Practice Development Department, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde 2014. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying,recording or otherwise without the prior permission of Practice Development Department, NHS GG&C. Acknowledgement of sources of illustrations Figure 1 – page 7 Yellow Card Reproduced with the kind permission of the MHRA. Figure 2 – page 9 Peripheral venous access. Reproduced with the kind permission of Smith and Nephew. Figure 3 – page 10 Midline. Images provided by Vygon (UK) Ltd – © Vygon (UK) Ltd 2012. Figure 4 – page 10 Peripherally inserted central catheter. Provided by Vygon (UK) Ltd - © Vygon (UK) Ltd 2012. Figure 5 – page 10 Non Skin Tunnelled Central Line. Reproduced with the kind permission of Smith and Nephew. Figure 6 – page 11 Skin Tunnelled central venous access. Provided by Vygon (UK) Ltd - © Vygon (UK) Ltd 2012. Figure 7 – page 11 Indwelling Central Venous Access Device. Provided by Vygon (UK) Ltd - © Vygon (UK) Ltd 2012. Figure 10 – page 19 Anaphylaxis algorithm - Reproduced with the kind permission of the Resuscitation Council (UK). Contents Prerequisites for undertaking the IV
    [Show full text]
  • Cimzia (Certolizumab Pegol) AHM
    Cimzia (Certolizumab Pegol) AHM Clinical Indications • Cimzia (Certolizumab Pegol) is considered medically necessary for adult members 18 years of age or older with moderately-to-severely active disease when ALL of the following conditions are met o Moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease as manifested by 1 or more of the following . Diarrhea . Abdominal pain . Bleeding . Weight loss . Perianal disease . Internal fistulae . Intestinal obstruction . Megacolon . Extra-intestinal manifestations: arthritis or spondylitis o Crohn's disease has remained active despite treatment with 1 or more of the following . Corticosteroids . 6-mercaptopurine/azathioprine • Certollizumab pegol (see note) is considered medically necessary for persons with active psoriatic arthritis who meet criteria in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Biological Therapies. • Cimzia, (Certolizumab Pegol), alone or in combination with methotrexate (MTX), is considered medically necessary for the treatment of adult members 18 years of age or older with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). • Cimzia (Certolizumab pegol is considered medically necessary for reducing signs and symptoms of members with active ankylosing spondylitis who have an inadequate response to 2 or more NSAIDs. • Cimzia (Certolizumab Pegol) is considered investigational for all other indications (e.g.,ocular inflammation/uveitis; not an all-inclusive list) because its effectiveness for indications other than the ones listed above has not been established. Notes • There are several brands of targeted immune modulators on the market. There is a lack of reliable evidence that any one brand of targeted immune modulator is superior to other brands for medically necessary indications. Enbrel (etanercept), Humira (adalimumab), Remicade (infliximab), Simponi (golimumab), Simponi Aria (golimumab intravneous), and Stelara (ustekinumab) brands of targeted immune modulators ("least cost brands of targeted immune modulators") are less costly to the plan.
    [Show full text]