DOCSLIB.ORG

Coconino County Comprehensive Plan -- Covers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Coconino County Comprehensive Plan A Conservation-Based Comprehensive Planning Partnership From the “The Coconino County Comprehensive Plan serves as a roadmap for the future by Plan’s Forward establishing goals and policies to direct growth responsibly, solve problems, and improve the quality of life for county residents. … This plan is driven not only by the issues that citizens have identified as critical, but also by long-range goals based on our vision of the future.” Award Recognition 2003 Planning Award for Excellence — American Planning Association’s Small Town and Rural Planning Division 2003 Technical Publication Award for Excellence — Society for Technical Communication, Southwest Regional Publications, Art, and Online Competitions Praise for the “I especially appreciate the focus on preservation of our unique environment and the Comprehensive Plan inclusiveness of all the valued aspects of our county.” –Coconino County Resident “I’m proud to live in such a forward-thinking county! Great plan!” –Coconino County Resident “The plan is positive, proactive, and necessary. I applaud and commend those who prepared it. Excellent work!” –Coconino County Resident “I am very impressed with the … comprehensive plan. I am not speaking only about content or to the process you have outlined, but also to the way you have chosen to communicate this information to everyone.” –Candy Owens, Coconino County Recorder “The cross-references, quotes and notes, page numbers, and engaging writing style really add to the effectiveness of [the plan].” – Adjudicator for the Society for Technical Communication’s Southwest Regional Publications, Art, and Online Competitions “This plan meets and exceeds the requirements of Growing Smarter in almost all areas. Overall, it was a pleasure to review, as it contains innovative conservation planning techniques that will likely be used as a model for similar communities in years to come. It is clearly laid out, well written, and establishes a compelling purpose and vision that are followed by defined implementation policies. The plan is easily navigable to those unfamiliar with planning jargon. … The first chapters give the reader a clear sense of the purpose, background, and process that shaped this plan. [The plan] clearly gives the citizen reader the idea that he or she has a responsibility to be an active steward of the community’s future.” –Debra Z. Sydenham, AICP, Arizona Department of Commerce Community Planning Manager “An excellent model of a community plan.” – Adjudicator for the Society for Technical Communication’s Southwest Regional Publications, Art, and Online Competitions Coconino County Comprehensive On the Web @ http://co.coconino.az.us/partnership Plan The Coconino County Comprehensive Planning Partnership Coconino County Comprehensive Plan A Conservation-Based Comprehensive Planning Partnership Coconino County, Arizona Adopted September 23, 2003 Coconino County Arizona • The Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Planning Partnership Coconino County Community Development Department 2500 North Fort Valley Road, Building 1 Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 928.226.2700 or 1.800.559.9289 Project Development, Plan Review, & Approvals Comprehensive Planning Partnership project officially initiated January 11, 2002. Public review draft plan distributed May 29, 2003. Draft plan approved by the Comprehensive Planning Partnership Steering Committee June 10, 2003. Draft plan approved by the Coconino County Planning & Zoning Commission July 29, 2003. Final plan unanimously approved and adopted by Resolution 2003-63 of the Coconino County Board of Supervisors September 23, 2003. Plan Design & Publication This is a public document developed by staff of the Coconino County Community Development Department and others of the Comprehensive Planning Partnership. Rights of photos and graphics are retained by their original owner and may not be reproduced (other than general reproduction of this document) without express written permission of the owner. Any photo without expressed credit, is courtesy of Coconino County. The main front cover photo is by Grant Cooper. The map was produced by the Coconino County GIS Department. Credits for the other front cover photos (from left to right) include: John Aber; J. Ernest Jutte; John Aber; J. Ernest Jutte; Grant Cooper; and John Aber. Credits for back cover photos go to: Grant Cooper; Grant Cooper; John Aber; BLM; John Aber; and Coconino County. This document was designed and formatted by J. Ernest Jutte, AICP. The main body text is set in 11 point Garamond, a typeface named for the Frenchman Claude Garamond of the early 1500s. Major titles use Arial Black type. Century Gothic typeface is employed for subtitles, margin headers, and highlights. A Signature type is used for script drop characters. Original, full-color hardcopies of the Comprehensive Plan printed on Neenah “Environment” paper, 100% recycled post-consumer fiber, totally chlorine free. Printed in Phoenix, Arizona. The Plan on the Web Coconino County’s Partnership website: http://co.coconino.az.us/partnership i Foreword One of the most spectacular places on earth, Coconino County is home to the Grand Canyon, Vermilion Cliffs, San Francisco Peaks, and Oak Creek Canyon, among other unique natural features. Each year, it attracts millions of visitors and hundreds of new residents who are drawn to its welcoming communities and open spaces. Residents ex- press widespread satisfaction with Coconino County as a place to live; however, they also want to manage growth and development to ensure that the qualities they value are not destroyed in the process of accommodating change. This Coconino County Comprehensive Plan serves as a roadmap for the future by establishing goals and policies to direct growth responsibly, solve problems, and improve the quality of life for county residents. The Comprehensive Plan’s main objectives are to: • Preserve and promote stable, safe, attractive, rural communities where residents share a sense of pride. • Safeguard the choices residents expect for living, recreation, and circu- lation. • Coordinate strategies for economic development, transportation, and affordable housing so that we can better link the places where people work and live. • Protect our unique natural resources, ecosystems, and habitats. Not only will the Comprehensive Plan guide land use decisions, but it will also serve as a comprehensive reference and blueprint for community programs, as well as for public- and private-sector initiatives. This plan is driven not only by issues that residents have identified as critical, but also by long-range goals based on our vision of the future. ii Coconino County Arizona • The Comprehensive Plan Acknowledgments Comprehensive Planning Partnership Project Steering Committee Jim Arnold, Lake Powell Construction Mike Lainoff, Coconino Community College Steve Catanach, Arizona Public Service Mandy Metzger, The Diablo Trust Bill Cordasco, Babbitt Ranches Maggie Sacher, Lees Ferry Lodge Frank Dickens, Coldwell Banker Narico Shelley Silbert, The Nature Conservancy Bruce Fox, PhD, NAU Honors Program (subsequently with NAU’s Center for Sustainable Environments) Gene Waldrip, Coconino National Forest Chris Thurston, Red Feather Properties Rich Gorney, Bankers Real Estate Eunice Tso, ETD Consulting Chuck Hammersley, PhD, NAU Parks and Recreation Manage- ment Program Coconino County Board of Supervisors Matt Ryan, Chair, District 3 Liz Archuleta, District 2 Louise Yellowman, Vice Chair, District 5 Deb Hill, District 4 Paul Babbitt, District 1 Coconino County Planning & Zoning Commission Maggie Sacher, Chair, District 5 Janis Crosman, District 4 Celia Barotz, District 1 Cathy Flores, District 4 Mark Buzzard, District 3 Patty Garcia, District 2 Grant Cooper, District 2 Nancy Taylor, District 1 Project Coordinator J. Ernest Jutte, AICP, Coconino County Community Development Department Project Management Team Bill Towler, AICP, Director, Coconino County Community Development Department Angela Creedon, Arizona Public Service Cynthia Lovely, Coconino County Parks and Recreation Department Chris Newell, Grand Canyon Trust Jean Richmond-Bowman, Northern Arizona Building Association Coconino County Community Development Department Sue Pratt, AICP, Principal Planner John Aber, Senior Planner Tiffany Antol, AICP, Planner Acknowledgments • Coconino County Arizona iii Science Advisory Group Steve Gatewood, Private consultant Abe Springer, PhD, NAU Department of Geology Helen Fairley, Plateau Archeology Ethan Aumack, NAU Center of Environmental Sciences Interagency Workgroup & Partnership Agency Representatives Catherine Balzano, Arizona State Land Department Al Hendricks, Arizona State Land Department Jim Confer, Arizona Department of Transportation Bruce Higgins, Kaibab National Forest Katherine Farr, Coconino National Forest Michele James, Grand Canyon Trust Chris Fetzer, AICP, Northern Arizona Council of Governments Paul Whitefield, National Park Service Diana Hawks, Bureau of Land Management Arizona Strip Debbie Wright, Arizona Game & Fish Department Shaula Hedwall, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Project Funding Assistance Arizona Department of Commerce Grand Canyon Trust Arizona Department of Transportation National Park Service Arizona Public Service Special Project Assistance Joan Carstensen, Joan Carstensen Graphic Design (map graphics Lisa Malde, GIS intern (research and mapping) and photo management) Jackie Marlette, GIS intern (research and mapping) Steve Fluck, Grand Canyon Trust (data
Recommended publications
  • Blind/Visual Impairment Resources

    Blind/Visual Impairment Resources

    ARIZONA Blind/Visual Impairment Resources Arizona Blind/Visual Impairment Resources Arizona Blind and Deaf Children's Foundation, Inc. 3957 East Speedway Blvd., Suite 207 Tucson, AZ 85712-4548 Phone: (520) 577-3700 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.azblinddeafchildren.org/ Contact Name: Joseph Hayden, Chairman Organization Type: Independent and Community Living, State and Local Organizations Disabilities Served: Hearing Impairments / Deaf, Visual Impairment / Blind The Foundation’s mission is to invest in the future of Arizona’s children and youth with vision and hearing loss. Through fundraising, program development, advocacy and grant-making, the Foundation helps bridge the gap between public education funding and access to the quality educational experiences essential to prepare Arizona students to be self-sufficient and contributing members of society. They are an organization that supports the empowerment and achievements of blind and deaf children and youth through programs and initiatives. In partnership with public and private organizations, they develop and fund quality programs that target underserved children and youth. Arizona Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc. 3100 E. Roosevelt St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 Phone: (602) 273-7411 Fax: (602) 273-7410 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.acbvi.org/ Contact Name: Jim LaMay, Executive Director Organization Type: Assistive Technology, Information Centers, State and Local Organizations Disabilities Served: Visual Impairment / Blind The mission of the Arizona Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired is to enhance the quality of life of people who are blind or otherwise visually impaired, by providing a wide range of services. These services promote independence, dignity, and full participation in all spheres of life, including at home, at work and in the community.
  • Trip Planner

    Trip Planner

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon, Arizona Trip Planner Table of Contents WELCOME TO GRAND CANYON ................... 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................... 3 GETTING TO GRAND CANYON ...................... 4 WEATHER ........................................................ 5 SOUTH RIM ..................................................... 6 SOUTH RIM SERVICES AND FACILITIES ......... 7 NORTH RIM ..................................................... 8 NORTH RIM SERVICES AND FACILITIES ......... 9 TOURS AND TRIPS .......................................... 10 HIKING MAP ................................................... 12 DAY HIKING .................................................... 13 HIKING TIPS .................................................... 14 BACKPACKING ................................................ 15 GET INVOLVED ................................................ 17 OUTSIDE THE NATIONAL PARK ..................... 18 PARK PARTNERS ............................................. 19 Navigating Trip Planner This document uses links to ease navigation. A box around a word or website indicates a link. Welcome to Grand Canyon Welcome to Grand Canyon National Park! For many, a visit to Grand Canyon is a once in a lifetime opportunity and we hope you find the following pages useful for trip planning. Whether your first visit or your tenth, this planner can help you design the trip of your dreams. As we welcome over 6 million visitors a year to Grand Canyon, your
  • Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2008

    Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2008

    United States Department of Forest Insect and Agriculture Forest Disease Conditions in Service Southwestern the Southwestern Region Forestry and Forest Health Region, 2008 July 2009 PR-R3-16-5 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Pandora moth caterpillar collected on the North Kaibab Ranger District, Kaibab National Forest. Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2008 Southwestern Region Forestry and Forest Health Regional Office Salomon Ramirez, Director Allen White, Pesticide Specialist Forest Health Zones Offices Arizona Zone John Anhold, Zone Leader Mary Lou Fairweather, Pathologist Roberta Fitzgibbon, Entomologist Joel McMillin, Entomologist
  • Of North Rim Pocket

    Of North Rim Pocket

    Grand Canyon National Park National Park Service Grand Canyon Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior Pocket Map North Rim Services Guide Services, Facilities, and Viewpoints Inside the Park North Rim Visitor Center / Grand Canyon Lodge Campground / Backcountry Information Center Services and Facilities Outside the Park Protect the Park, Protect Yourself Information, lodging, restaurants, services, and Grand Canyon views Camping, fuel, services, and hiking information Lodging, camping, food, and services located north of the park on AZ 67 Use sunblock, stay hydrated, take Keep wildlife wild. Approaching your time, and rest to reduce and feeding wildlife is dangerous North Rim Visitor Center North Rim Campground Kaibab Lodge the risk of sunburn, dehydration, and illegal. Bison and deer can Park in the designated parking area and walk to the south end of the parking Operated by the National Park Service; $18–25 per night; no hookups; dump Located 18 miles (30 km) north of North Rim Visitor Center; open May 15 to nausea, shortness of breath, and become aggressive and will defend lot. Bring this Pocket Map and your questions. Features new interpretive station. Reservation only May 15 to October 15: 877-444-6777 or recreation. October 20; lodging and restaurant. 928-638-2389 or kaibablodge.com exhaustion. The North Rim's high their space. Keep a safe distance exhibits, park ranger programs, restroom, drinking water, self-pay fee station, gov. Reservation or first-come, first-served October 16–31 with limited elevation (8,000 ft / 2,438 m) and of at least 75 feet (23 m) from all nearby canyon views, and access to Bright Angel Point Trail.
  • Yanawant: Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip

    Yanawant: Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip

    Yanawant Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip Volume Two OfOfOf The Arizona Strip Landscapes and Place Name Study Prepared by Diane Austin Erin Dean Justin Gaines December 12, 2005 Yanawant Paiute Places and Landscapes in the Arizona Strip Volume Two Of The Arizona Strip Landscapes and Place Name Study Prepared for Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Strip Field Office St. George, Utah Prepared by: Diane Austin Erin Dean Justin Gaines Report of work carried out under contract number #AAA000011TOAAF030023 2 Table of Contents Preface……………………………………………………………………………………………ii i Chapter One: Southern Paiute History on the Arizona Strip………………………………...1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Early Southern Paiute Contact with Europeans and Euroamericans ........................... 5 1.2 Southern Paiutes and Mormons ........................................................................................ 8 1.3 The Second Powell Expedition......................................................................................... 13 1.4 An Onslaught of Cattle and Further Mormon Expansion............................................ 16 1.5 Interactions in the First Half of the 20 th Century ......................................................... 26 Chapter Two: Southern Paiute Place Names On and Near the Arizona Strip 37 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
  • Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan

    Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan

    Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan Adopted August 16, 2004 Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Trail Commission Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Maricopa County Planning and Development Flood Control District of Maricopa County We have an obligation to protect open spaces for future generations. Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan VISION Our vision is to connect the majestic open spaces of the Maricopa County Regional Parks with a nonmotorized trail system. The Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan - page 1 Credits Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Andrew Kunasek, District 3, Chairman Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 Maricopa County Trail Commission Supervisor Max Wilson, District 4 Chairman Supervisor Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Parks Commission Members: Citizen Members: Laurel Arndt, Chair Art Wirtz, District 2 Randy Virden, Vice-Chair Jim Burke, District 3 Felipe Zubia, District 5 Stakeholders: Carol Erwin, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Fred Pfeifer, Arizona Public Service (APS) James Duncan, Salt River Project (SRP) Teri Raml, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ex-officio Members: William Scalzo, Chief Community Services Officer Pictured from left to right Laurel Arndt, Supervisor Andy Kunasek, Fred Pfeifer, Carol Erwin, Arizona’s Official State Historian, Marshall Trimble, and Art Wirtz pose with the commemorative branded trail marker Mike Ellegood, Director, Public Works at the Maricopa Trail
  • Planning and Zoning

    Planning and Zoning

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Summary............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Definitions Used in This Plan ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 How to Use the Plan .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Circulation .................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Applicability .................................................................................................................. 3 1.7 Previous Comprehensive Plans ................................................................................... 3 1.8 Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan ................................................................... 3 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Role and Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan ............................................................ 5 2.2 Land Use Element........................................................................................................ 5 2.3
  • Songbird Ecology in Southwestern Ponderosa

    Songbird Ecology in Southwestern Ponderosa

    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Chapter 1 Ecology of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests William H. Moir, Brian Geils, Mary Ann Benoit, and Dan Scurlock describes natural and human induced changes in the com- What Is Ponderosa Pine Forest position and structure of these forests. and Why Is It Important? Forests dominated by ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Paleoecology var. scopulorurn) are a major forest type of western North America (figure 1; Steele 1988; Daubenmire 1978; Oliver and Ryker 1990). In this publication, a ponderosa pine The oldest remains of ponderosa pine in the Western forest has an overstory, regardless of successional stage, United States are 600,000 year old fossils found in west dominated by ponderosa pine. This definition corresponds central Nevada. Examination of pack rat middens in New to the interior ponderosa pine cover type of the Society of Mexico and Texas, shows that ponderosa pine was absent American Foresters (Eyre1980). At lower elevations in the during the Wisconsin period (about 10,400 to 43,000 years mountainous West, ponderosa pine forests are generally ago), although pinyon-juniper woodlands and mixed co- bordered by grasslands, pinyon-juniper woodlands, or nifer forests were extensive (Betancourt 1990). From the chaparral (shrublands). The ecotone may be wide or nar- late Pleistocene epoch (24,000 years ago) to the end of the row, and a ponderosa pine forest is recognized when the last ice age (about 10,400 years ago), the vegetation of the overstory contains at least 5 percent ponderosa pine (USFS Colorado Plateau moved southward or northward with 1986).
  • A Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model for Fossil Springs, Western

    A Conceptual Hydrogeologic Model for Fossil Springs, Western

    A CONCEPTUAL HYDROGEOLOGIC MODEL FOR FOSSIL SPRINGS, WESTERN MOGOLLON RIM, ARIZONA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SPRINGS PROCESSES By L. Megan Green A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geology Northern Arizona University May 2008 Approved: _________________________________ Abraham E. Springer, Ph.D., Chair _________________________________ Roderic A. Parnell, Jr., Ph.D. _________________________________ Paul J. Umhoefer, Ph.D. ABSTRACT A CONCEPTUAL HYDROGEOLOGIC MODEL FOR FOSSIL SPRINGS, WEST MOGOLLON MESA, ARIZONA: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SPRINGS PROCESSES L. Megan Green Fossil Springs is the largest spring system discharging along the western Mogollon Rim in central Arizona and is a rare and important resource to the region. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the source of groundwater discharging at Fossil Springs. This was accomplished by (1) constructing a 3-D digital hydrogeologic framework model from available data to depict the subsurface geology of the western Mogollon Rim region and (2) by compiling and interpreting regional structural and geophysical data for Arizona’s central Transition Zone. EarthVision, a 3-D GIS modeling software, was used to construct the framework model. Two end-member models were created; the first was a simple interpolation of the data and the second was a result of geologic interpretations. The second model shows a monocline trending along the Diamond Rim fault. Both models show Fossil Springs discharging at the intersection of the Diamond Rim fault and Fossil Springs fault, at the contact between the Redwall Limestone and Naco Formation. The second objective of this study was a compilation of regional data for Arizona’s central Transition Zone.
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report

    Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report

    USGS-NPS National Vegetation Mapping Program: Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument, Arizona, Vegetation Classification and Distribution By Monica Hansen1, Janet Coles2, Kathryn A. Thomas1, Daniel Cogan2, Marion Reid3, Jim Von Loh2, and Keith Schulz3 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SOUTHWEST BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE CENTER Final Report Prepared for: USGS-NPS National Vegetation Mapping Program 1Colorado Plateau Research Station Southwest Biological Science Center U.S. Geological Survey Flagstaff, AZ 86001 2Remote Sensing and GIS Group U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) Denver, Colorado 3NatureServe Boulder, Colorado Flagstaff, Arizona 2004 UGSG-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. 3 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ 4 LIST OF CONTACTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................................ 5 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................................................................................. 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS ................................................................................... 8 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 9 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................
  • RODEN CRATER Within a Dormant Volcano on the Arizona Plains, a Radical Art Experiment Is Being Constructed

    RODEN CRATER Within a Dormant Volcano on the Arizona Plains, a Radical Art Experiment Is Being Constructed

    RODEN CRATER Within a dormant volcano on the Arizona plains, a radical art experiment is being constructed. For forty years, artist James Turrell has been building his “naked-eye observatory,” capturing light itself in a profound and immersive way that makes viewers reassess how – and what – they see. By Nat Trotman PATEK PHILIPPE 39 Previous page: Roden Crater sunrise, light enters through Crater’s Eye, the primary on the desert plain, seen the Skyspace of the East viewing space. Sit on the from the southwest. Below: Portal (bottom) and projects long bench, look up, and the Sun and Moon Space, a majestic image of the sun find yourself transported by deep inside the volcano. onto a large marble stone. a vision – a radiant image, At each year’s northernmost Opposite: the formidable which is in fact the sky Just north of Flagstaff, Arizona, hundreds of dormant volcanoes lie scattered across the arid plain in a pattern established over six million years of the earth’s tectonic movements. Driving along the dirt roads that wind among these colossal shapes, you might pass herds of grazing cattle or the occasional homestead, but if you don’t know where to look, you might miss Roden Crater. Neither the largest nor most dramatic example in the range, this cinder cone has nonethe- less preoccupied artist James Turrell for 40 years, serving as site, subject, and medium of a project that, when complete, may turn out to be the most ambitious and complex artwork of the modern era. Turrell has sculpted the crater bowl and cut a series of chambers, tunnels, and apertures within the volcano, oriented around celestial events.
  • March 12, 2020 Heather Provencio Forest

    March 12, 2020 Heather Provencio Forest

    March 12, 2020 Heather Provencio Forest Supervisor Kaibab National Forest 800 South 6th Street Williams, AZ 86046 [email protected] Re: Forest Service Should Reject Stilo and Tusayan’s Special Use Proposal Dear Supervisor Provencio: We understand that you are currently evaluating Stilo Development Group and the Town of Tusayan’s January 23, 2020 revised joint proposal for special use authorization for easements to enable a massive commercial, retail, and residential development on inholdings at the doorstep of Grand Canyon National Park. Stilo’s proposed development will have significant adverse impacts on the Grand Canyon, the Kaibab National Forest, and tribal nations. As noted in our previous letter, the National Park Service previously has cautioned that Stilo’s proposed development will have “tremendous negative (and possibly irretrievable) impacts on the park infrastructure and resources for which the park was established,”1 and constitutes one of the gravest threats to the Park in its now 100-year history.2 The proposed development is largely, perhaps entirely, unchanged since the Forest Service rejected Stilo and Tusayan’s similar 2014 special use proposal for failing to satisfy the agency’s mandatory initial- and secondary-screening criteria under 36 C.F.R. § 251.54(e). Stilo and Tusayan’s January 23, 2020 special use proposal likewise fails to satisfy the mandatory screening criteria, and thus it would be arbitrary and capricious for the Forest Service to now accept the proposal. In fact, regarding the critical issue of groundwater consumption, their revised special use proposal seemingly is less protective of groundwater resources—and thus less protective of the Grand Canyon’s fragile seeps and springs—than their 2019 draft proposal.