A Preliminary Survey of the Nitrogen and Carbon Isotope Characteristics of Fish from the Lagoons of Egypt’S Nile Delta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Preliminary Survey of the Nitrogen and Carbon Isotope Characteristics of Fish from the Lagoons of Egypt’S Nile Delta Estuaries and Coasts (2008) 31:1130–1142 DOI 10.1007/s12237-008-9102-3 A Preliminary Survey of the Nitrogen and Carbon Isotope Characteristics of Fish from the Lagoons of Egypt’s Nile Delta Autumn Oczkowski & Scott Nixon & Steve Granger & Abdel-Fattah M. El-Sayed & Mark Altabet & Richard McKinney Received: 26 June 2008 /Revised: 13 August 2008 /Accepted: 23 September 2008 /Published online: 17 October 2008 # Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2008 Abstract The present study reports nitrogen and carbon probable importance of autochthonous particulate organic stable isotope data (δ15N and δ13C) from four large (63– matter rather than terrestrial detritus or marine plankton in 400 km2), shallow (∼1 m) coastal lagoons on Egypt’s Nile the diets of resident fish populations in the lagoons. Delta. While the lagoons all receive sewage and agricultural drainage, the magnitude of loading varies. In this prelim- Keywords Stable isotope . Nitrogen . Carbon . Egypt . inary survey, we document wide variability in the δ15N and Lagoons . Nile delta δ13C isotope values of major fish groups among these lagoons. There were no consistent or significant differences among the major groups of fish, including carp, catfish, Introduction mullet, and tilapia. There was a strong positive correlation (R2=0.84) between the average δ15N values of fish muscle Egypt’s Nile Delta is a highly engineered system that has and estimated water residence time among the lagoons. been modified by human activity for 5,000 years (Brewer This preliminary evidence suggests that nitrogen cycle 2005). Four large lagoons along the northern coast are transformations may be more important than primary N striking features on the delta landscape (Fig. 1). The source differences in determining N isotopic ratios of lagoons have an equally long history of human impact set organisms in the lagoons. The δ13C results point to the in the context of rapidly changing social and natural systems. Some of the modern pressures include the A. Oczkowski (*) : S. Nixon : S. Granger conversion of lagoon area to land agriculture, aquaculture Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, ponds and salt pans, changes in hydrology, circulation and South Ferry Road, sediment load, the addition of large amounts of agricultural Narragansett, RI 02882, USA e-mail: [email protected] drainage water and urban sewage, and dramatic increases in inorganic nutrient concentrations (Hamza 2006; Oczkowski A.-F. M. El-Sayed and Nixon 2008). There is also a long history of intensive Department Oceanography, Faculty of Science, artisanal fishing in the lagoons (Oczkowski and Nixon Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt 2008). The impacts of these pressures on the lagoon ecosystems are largely undocumented. M. Altabet While subjected to a range of ever-changing physical The School for Marine Science and Technology, and chemical conditions, the lagoons have generally University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 706 South Rodney French Boulevard, remained productive. Together, they supply approximately New Bedford, MA 02744, USA 30% to 40% of Egypt’s commercial fish landings and provide an important local food source (GAFRD 2007). R. McKinney Anthropogenic sources of nutrients are sufficiently large Atlantic Ecology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, 27 Tarzwell Drive, that at least part of this coastal fishery may be supported by Narragansett, RI 02882, USA nutrient loading from fertilizers and sewage associated with Estuaries and Coasts (2008) 31:1130–1142 1131 the agricultural practices on the delta and cities discharging sewage (largely untreated) either upstream or directly into the lagoons (Nixon 2003; Oczkowski and Nixon 2008). However, direct evidence that anthropogenic nutrients contribute to lagoon food webs and productivity is lacking. The agricultural drainage water also potentially links food chains in the lagoons to nutrients and terrestrial detritus from the highly productive agricultural vegetation covering the delta. Context of the Study With Egypt more than 95% desert, all of the nation’s agriculture and 90% of its population is confined to the narrow banks of the Nile and the delta (25,000 km2; Fig. 1; Nixon 2003). The delta itself is a complex mosaic of cities, towns, and villages set among large agricultural areas. Few of these small urban centers are equipped with sewage treatment infrastructure, and their waste is released into more than 13,000 km of drainage canals which eventually discharge to four large (63–500 km2), shallow (∼1 m deep) coastal lagoons (Burullus, Edku, Manzalah, Maryut) or directly offshore (Richards 1982; National Water Resources Plan 2017 2005). As water is such a valuable resource in Egypt, there are very dense and highly engineered networks of agricultural canals taking water from the Nile to irrigate tile-drained fields and agricultural drains to carry water from the fields for ultimate discharge to the lagoons or on the Mediterranean Coast (Stanley 1996; National Water Resources Plan 2017 2005). Since the closure of the Aswan High Dam in 1965, Egypt’s fertilizer consumption has increased almost four- fold, and the country’s population has more than doubled (FAO 2008). These changes suggest a dramatic increase in the N and phosphorous (P) loads to the delta ecosystem as ’ Fig. 1 The top panel: Egypt s Nile Delta with agricultural areas the amounts of agricultural runoff and sewage have indicated in grey (source data, Digital Chart of the World (DCW), Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) 1:1,000,000 continued to increase (Nixon 2003). The control of the scale). The Nile flows north through Cairo and then splits into the Nile also made it possible to provide irrigation all year and Rosetta and Damietta branches (black lines). Dark gray lines represent maintain the agricultural areas of the delta in almost some of the major drains and canals on the delta (data from DCW). continuous production. The crosshairs in the center of the image correspond to 31°0′ E, 31°0′ N. Lagoon panels (below top panel), clockwise from upper left, show Our purpose in this preliminary study was to take Burullus, Manzalah, Edku, and Maryut lagoons. Sampling locations advantage of two opportunities to visit the delta lagoons and are represented by closed circles, and the fish collected at these obtain samples of common commercial fishes from each locations are identified in Table 4 and correspond to the identification system. No stable isotope measurements have been reported numbers associated with the circles. In Maryut Lagoon, only the Main Basin (MB) and Fisheries Basins (FB) are shown. The Desert Road from the lagoons, and we hoped that stable isotopes would divides these two basins and fish, water, and Nile lily samples were prove useful in documenting human influences on food webs taken from each basin (at the closed circles). The city of Alexandria and productivity in this very complex and perturbed environ- lies between Maryut Lagoon and the Mediterranean Sea. A sample of ment. We also sought to evaluate the importance of commercial fish food was sampled near Manzalah Lagoon at the closed circle labeled FF anthropogenic inputs compared to in situ N transformations in determining differences in nitrogen isotope values (δ15N) in lagoon food webs and to investigate the potential importance of terrestrial C and fresh and brackish water phytoplankton C sources in lagoon food chains. 1132 Estuaries and Coasts (2008) 31:1130–1142 Stable isotopes are now commonly used to look at the and particulate N of 1–2‰ (Sheats 2000). It was unclear at impact of anthropogenic nutrients on biogeochemical the outset if δ15N of fish from the different lagoons would cycles and food web structures (e.g., McClelland et al. be distinguishable or much greater than about 4–5‰ 1997; Fry 2002; Rogers 2003; Savage 2005; Oczkowski et (allowing for trophic fractionation of 3–4‰ from primary al. 2008). This is possible because N introduced via human producers). However, N isotopes fractionate with in-stream activities such as sewage effluent and fertilizer application, uptake, nitrification, and denitrification, and the δ15N can often be distinguished from N supplied by “natural” values observed in biota represent a complex mix of both sources (Fry 2006). Differences in the isotope ratio of heavy source and in-stream processing. Fry and Allen (2003) carbon (13C) to light (12C) in terrestrial plants and phyto- observed bivalves with δ15N values consistently >10‰ in plankton have been used for over 40 years to assess the the Mississippi River, which drains a large agricultural relative importance of terrestrial plant detritus compared with watershed. Raw wastewater (δ15N about 2‰ and 6‰, for − + in situ plankton primary producers in influencing secondary NO3 and NH4 , respectively) retained in temperate ponds productivity in coastal marine ecosystems (Parker 1967; for 13–20 days also had δ15N>10‰, which also points to Haines 1979;Fry2006). Numerous studies have shown that the significance of in situ fractionation (Jordan et al. 1997). different sources can be discerned even without character- Considering the complex network of agricultural drains on ization of the specific sources (Schlacher et al. 2005; Vizzini the delta, it seemed possible that fractionation of δ15Nin et al. 2005; Abreu et al. 2006; Bannon and Roman 2008; the bioavailable N pool would take place during transport Oczkowski et al. 2008). and fish would be characterized by much heavier (>10‰) We chose to focus primarily on the stable isotope values isotope values (Stanley 1996). of fish because they are of great commercial interest and are We anticipated that the contrast between δ13C source relatively long term integrators of nutrient enrichment and values would be more distinct, as fractionation within the carbon sources supporting secondary production (Vizzini et food web is far less for δ13C (Fry 2006; Finlay and Kendall al. 2005). 2007). Mediterranean fish typically have δ13Cvalues It was our hypothesis that differences in flow rates, crop ranging from −9‰ to −20‰ (Vizzini et al.
Recommended publications
  • Finální Verze 30.4. Tisk Odkazy
    OBSAH 1 ÚVOD A CÍLE PRÁCE............................................................................................ 3 2 PŘEHLED LITERATURY ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Třída Monogenea van Beneden, 1858 .............................................................. 4 2.1.1 Základní charakteristika................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Klasifikace .................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Ichtyofauna studovaného území ....................................................................... 7 2.3 Monogenea sladkovodních druh ů ryb povodí Nilu ........................................ 14 3 MATERIÁL A METODIKA .................................................................................. 24 3.1 Charakteristika studovaného území................................................................ 24 3.2 Metodika sb ěru dat.......................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Vyšet řené hostitelské ryby.......................................................................... 28 3.2.2 Sb ěr a fixace monogení............................................................................... 30 3.2.3 Determinace nalezených monogeneí .......................................................... 30 4 VÝSLEDKY............................................................................................................ 33 4.1 Přehled nalezených
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Waters C-04 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollusques
    397 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Asia - Inland waters C-04 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Asie - Eaux continentales (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Asia - Aguas continentales English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Freshwater bream Abramis brama 11 19 479 11 743 10 650 11 815 12 749 13 616 14 629 Freshwater breams nei Abramis spp 11 3 7 20 9 20 10 38 Common carp Cyprinus carpio 11 43 435 41 152 47 741 45 168 34 044 32 805 34 014 Tench Tinca tinca 11 2 0 0 0 690 778 983 Crucian carp Carassius carassius 11 8 273 6 877 6 213 5 686 5 528 5 226 4 602 Goldfish Carassius auratus 11 172 1 1 1 1 2 1 Roach Rutilus rutilus 11 235 537 502 733 1 084 1 365 1 498 Kutum Rutilus frisii 11 9 210 2 320 6 624 6 905 10 120 7 199 6 433 Roaches nei Rutilus spp 11 3 298 1 943 1 867 1 626 2 365 1 895 2 469 Rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus 11 ... ... ... ... ... ... 485 Common dace Leuciscus leuciscus 11 215 250 300 176 104 91 73 Mud carp Cirrhinus molitorella 11 3 4 7 7 6 6 9 Grass carp(=White amur) Ctenopharyngodon idellus 11 4 296 4 631 5 213 4 703 2 621 725 1 462 Silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix 11 18 324 16 958 12 055 14 819 9 415 4 270 4 451 Bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis 11 1 818 1 637 2 621 3 841 4 454 447 703 Kinneret bleak Acanthobrama terraesanctae 11 1 155 626 1 171 1
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Length-Weight Relationships of Blenniid Species (Actinopterygii, Blenniidae) from Mediterranean Brackish Waters in Turkey
    EISSN 2602-473X AQUATIC SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING Aquat Sci Eng 2019; 34(3): 96-102 • DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2019573052 Research Article Diversity and Length-Weight relationships of Blenniid Species (Actinopterygii, Blenniidae) from Mediterranean Brackish Waters in Turkey Deniz İnnal1 Cite this article as: Innal, D. (2019). Diversity and length-weight relationships of Blenniid Species (Actinopterygii, Blenniidae) from Mediterranean Brackish Waters in Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 34(3), 96-102. ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the species composition and range of Mediterranean Blennies (Ac- tinopterygii, Blenniidae) occurring in river estuaries and lagoon systems of the Mediterranean coast of Turkey, and to characterise the length–weight relationship of the specimens. A total of 15 sites were surveyed from November 2014 to June 2017. A total of 210 individuals representing 3 fish species (Rusty blenny-Parablennius sanguinolentus, Freshwater blenny-Salaria fluviatilis and Peacock blenny-Salaria pavo) were sampled from five (Beşgöz Creek Estuary, Manavgat River Es- tuary, Karpuzçay Creek Estuary, Köyceğiz Lagoon Lake and Beymelek Lagoon Lake) of the locali- ties investigated. The high juvenile densities of S. fluviatilis in Karpuzçay Creek Estuary and P. sanguinolentus in Beşgöz Creek Estuary were observed. Various threat factors were observed in five different native habitats of Blenny species. The threats on the habitat and the population of the species include the introduction of exotic species, water ORCID IDs of the authors: pollution, and more importantly, the destruction of habitats. Five non-indigenous species (Prus- D.İ.: 0000-0002-1686-0959 sian carp-Carassius gibelio, Eastern mosquitofish-Gambusia holbrooki, Redbelly tilapia-Copt- 1Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy odon zillii, Stone moroko-Pseudorasbora parva and Rainbow trout-Oncorhynchus mykiss) were University, Department of Biology, observed in the sampling sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian and Madagascan Cichlids
    FAMILY Cichlidae Bonaparte, 1835 - cichlids SUBFAMILY Etroplinae Kullander, 1998 - Indian and Madagascan cichlids [=Etroplinae H] GENUS Etroplus Cuvier, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1830 - cichlids [=Chaetolabrus, Microgaster] Species Etroplus canarensis Day, 1877 - Canara pearlspot Species Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) - green chromide [=caris, meleagris] GENUS Paretroplus Bleeker, 1868 - cichlids [=Lamena] Species Paretroplus dambabe Sparks, 2002 - dambabe cichlid Species Paretroplus damii Bleeker, 1868 - damba Species Paretroplus gymnopreopercularis Sparks, 2008 - Sparks' cichlid Species Paretroplus kieneri Arnoult, 1960 - kotsovato Species Paretroplus lamenabe Sparks, 2008 - big red cichlid Species Paretroplus loisellei Sparks & Schelly, 2011 - Loiselle's cichlid Species Paretroplus maculatus Kiener & Mauge, 1966 - damba mipentina Species Paretroplus maromandia Sparks & Reinthal, 1999 - maromandia cichlid Species Paretroplus menarambo Allgayer, 1996 - pinstripe damba Species Paretroplus nourissati (Allgayer, 1998) - lamena Species Paretroplus petiti Pellegrin, 1929 - kotso Species Paretroplus polyactis Bleeker, 1878 - Bleeker's paretroplus Species Paretroplus tsimoly Stiassny et al., 2001 - tsimoly cichlid GENUS Pseudetroplus Bleeker, in G, 1862 - cichlids Species Pseudetroplus maculatus (Bloch, 1795) - orange chromide [=coruchi] SUBFAMILY Ptychochrominae Sparks, 2004 - Malagasy cichlids [=Ptychochrominae S2002] GENUS Katria Stiassny & Sparks, 2006 - cichlids Species Katria katria (Reinthal & Stiassny, 1997) - Katria cichlid GENUS
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Introduced Tilapias on Native Biodiversity
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15: 463–483 (2005) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/aqc.699 The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity GABRIELLE C. CANONICOa,*, ANGELA ARTHINGTONb, JEFFREY K. MCCRARYc,d and MICHELE L. THIEMEe a Sustainable Development and Conservation Biology Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA b Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Australia c University of Central America, Managua, Nicaragua d Conservation Management Institute, College of Natural Resources, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA e Conservation Science Program, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA ABSTRACT 1. The common name ‘tilapia’ refers to a group of tropical freshwater fish in the family Cichlidae (Oreochromis, Tilapia, and Sarotherodon spp.) that are indigenous to Africa and the southwestern Middle East. Since the 1930s, tilapias have been intentionally dispersed worldwide for the biological control of aquatic weeds and insects, as baitfish for certain capture fisheries, for aquaria, and as a food fish. They have most recently been promoted as an important source of protein that could provide food security for developing countries without the environmental problems associated with terrestrial agriculture. In addition, market demand for tilapia in developed countries such as the United States is growing rapidly. 2. Tilapias are well-suited to aquaculture because they are highly prolific and tolerant to a range of environmental conditions. They have come to be known as the ‘aquatic chicken’ because of their potential as an affordable, high-yield source of protein that can be easily raised in a range of environments } from subsistence or ‘backyard’ units to intensive fish hatcheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Critically Endangered Freshwater Fish Species, the Clanwilliam Sandfish (Labeo Seeberi)
    Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the critically endangered freshwater fish species, the Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) By Shaun Francois Lesch Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Natural Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr C. Rhode Co-supervisor: Dr R. Slabbert Department of Genetics December 2020 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration: By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: December 2020 Copyright © 2020 Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract: Labeo spp. are large freshwater fish found throughout southern Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The genus is characterised by specialised structures around the mouth and lips making it adapted to herbivorous feeding (algae and detritus). Clanwilliam sandfish (Labeo seeberi) was once widespread throughout its natural habitat (Olifants-Doring River system), but significant decreases in population size have seen them become absent in the Olifants River and retreat to the headwaters in the tributaries of the Doring River. Currently sandfish are confined to three populations namely the Oorlogskloof Nature Reserve (OKNR), Rietkuil (Riet) and Bos, with OKNR being the largest of the three and deemed the species sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Coptodon Zillii (Redbelly Tilapia) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Redbelly Tilapia (Coptodon zillii) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, May 2019 Revised, September 2019 Web Version, 11/18/2019 Photo: J. Hoover, Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Public domain. Available: https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=485. (May 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Africa and Eurasia: South Morocco, Sahara, Niger-Benue system, rivers Senegal, Sassandra, Bandama, Boubo, Mé, Comoé, Bia, Ogun and Oshun, Volta system, Chad-Shari system [Teugels and Thys van den Audenaerde 1991], middle Congo River basin in the Ubangi, Uele [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964], Itimbiri, Aruwimi [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964; Decru 2015], Lindi- 1 Tshopo [Decru 2015] and Wagenia Falls [Moelants 2015] in Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lakes Albert [Thys van den Audenaerde 1964] and Turkana, Nile system and Jordan system [Teugels and Thys van den Audenaerde 1991].” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list the following countries as part of the native range of Coptodon zillii: Algeria, Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Israel, Ivory Coast, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, and Western Sahara. Status in the United States From NatureServe (2019): “Introduced and established in ponds and other waters in Maricopa County, Arizona; irrigation canals in Coachella, Imperial, and Palo Verde valleys, California; and headwater springs of San Antonio River, Bexar County, Texas; common (Page and Burr 1991). Established also in the Carolinas, Hawaii, and possibly in Florida and Nevada (Robins et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Fisheries Resource Enhancement and Conservation in Asia Xi RAP PUBLICATION 2010/22
    RAP PUBLICATION 2010/22 Inland fisheries resource enhancement and conservation in Asia xi RAP PUBLICATION 2010/22 INLAND FISHERIES RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT AND CONSERVATION IN ASIA Edited by Miao Weimin Sena De Silva Brian Davy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS REGIONAL OFFICE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Bangkok, 2010 i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-106751-2 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Chief Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch Communication Division FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to: [email protected] © FAO 2010 For copies please write to: Aquaculture Officer FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Maliwan Mansion, 39 Phra Athit Road Bangkok 10200 THAILAND Tel: (+66) 2 697 4119 Fax: (+66) 2 697 4445 E-mail: [email protected] For bibliographic purposes, please reference this publication as: Miao W., Silva S.D., Davy B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Access Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh
    The Open Access Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh As from January 2010 The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh (IJA) will be published exclusively as an on-line Open Access (OA) quarterly accessible by all AquacultureHub ( http://www.aquaculturehub.org ) members and registered individuals and institutions. Please visit our website ( http://siamb.org.il ) for free registration form, further information and instructions. This transformation from a subscription printed version to an on-line OA journal, aims at supporting the concept that scientific peer-reviewed publications should be made available to all, including those with limited resources. The OA IJA does not enforce author or subscription fees and will endeavor to obtain alternative sources of income to support this policy for as long as possible. Editor-in-Chief Published under auspices of Dan Mires The Society of Israeli Aquaculture and Marine Biotechnology (SIAMB), Editorial Board University of Hawai ɄɄɄi at Mānoa Library & Rina Chakrabarti Aqua Research Lab, Dept. of Zoology, University of Hawai ɄɄɄi at Mānoa University of Delhi, India Aquaculture Program Angelo Colorni National Center for Mariculture, IOLR in association with Eilat, Israel AquacultureHub http://www.aquaculturehub.org Daniel Golani The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel Hillel Gordin Kibbutz Yotveta, Arava, Israel Sheenan Harpaz Agricultural Research Organization Beit Dagan, Gideon Hulata Agricultural Research Organization Beit Dagan, George Wm. Kissil National Center for Mariculture, IOLR, Eilat, Israel Ingrid Lupatsch Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK Spencer Malecha Dept. of Human Nutrition, Food & Animal Sciences, CTAHR, University of Hawaii Constantinos Hellenic Center for Marine Research, ISSN 0792 - 156X Mylonas Crete, Greece Amos Tandler National Center for Mariculture, IOLR Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - BAMIGDEH.
    [Show full text]
  • Cichlid (Family Cichlidae) Diversity in North Carolina
    Cichlid (Family Cichlidae) Diversity in North Carolina The Family Cichlidae, known collectively as cichlids, is a very diverse (about 1600 species) family of fishes indigenous to tropical and subtropical fresh and brackish waters of Mexico, Central and South America, the West Indies, Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian subcontinent. Only one species, the Ro Grande Cichlid, Herichthys cyanoguttatus, is native to the United States where it is found in Texas (Fuller et al. 1999). In the United States they are popular in the aquarium trade and in aquaculture ultimately for human consumption. Unwanted and/or overgrown aquarium fishes are often dumped illegally into local ponds, lakes, and waterways. More than 60 nonindigenous species have been found in waters of the United States (https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/SpeciesList.aspx?specimennumber=&group=Fishes&state=&family=Cich lidae&genus=&species=&comname=&status=0&YearFrom=&YearTo=&fmb=0&pathway=0&nativeexotic= 0%20&Sortby=1&size=50, accessed 03/03/2021). There are two nonindigenous species of cichlids in North Carolina with established, reproducing, and until recently, persistent populations: Redbelly Tilapia, Coptodon zilli, and Blue Tilapia, Oreochromis aureus. (Tracy et al. 2020). The two common names, Redbelly Tilapia and Blue Tilapia, are the American Fisheries Society-accepted common names (Page et al. 2013) and each species has a scientific (Latin) name (Appendix 1). Redbelly Tilapia can reach a length of 320 mm (12.5 inches) and Blue Tilapia a length of 370 mm (14.5 inches) (Page and Burr 2011). Redbelly Tilapia was originally stocked in Sutton Lake (Cape Fear basin), in Duke Energy’s Weatherspoon cooling pond near Lumberton (Lumber basin), and in PCS Phosphate Company’s ponds near Aurora (record not mapped; Tar basin) in attempts to manage aquatic macrophytes.
    [Show full text]
  • 58 1 Shelton.Pdf
    The Open Access Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh As from January 2010 The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh (IJA) will be published exclusively as an on-line Open Access (OA) quarterly accessible by all AquacultureHub (http://www.aquaculturehub.org) members and registered individuals and institutions. Please visit our website (http://siamb.org.il) for free registration form, further information and instructions. This transformation from a subscription printed version to an on-line OA journal, aims at supporting the concept that scientific peer-reviewed publications should be made available to all, including those with limited resources. The OA IJA does not enforce author or subscription fees and will endeavor to obtain alternative sources of income to support this policy for as long as possible. Editor-in-Chief Published under auspices of Dan Mires The Society of Israeli Aquaculture and Marine Biotechnology (SIAMB), Editorial Board University of Hawaii at Manoa Library Sheenan Harpaz Agricultural Research Organization and Beit Dagan, Israel University of Hawaii Aquaculture Zvi Yaron Dept. of Zoology Program in association with Tel Aviv University AquacultureHub Tel Aviv, Israel http://www.aquaculturehub.org Angelo Colorni National Center for Mariculture, IOLR Eilat, Israel Rina Chakrabarti Aqua Research Lab Dept. of Zoology University of Delhi Ingrid Lupatsch Swansea University Singleton Park, Swansea, UK Jaap van Rijn The Hebrew University Faculty of Agriculture Israel Spencer Malecha Dept. of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences University of Hawaii Daniel Golani The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel Emilio Tibaldi Udine University Udine, Italy ISSN 0792 - 156X Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - BAMIGDEH. Copy Editor Ellen Rosenberg PUBLISHER: Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - BAMIGDEH - Kibbutz Ein Hamifratz, Mobile Post 25210, ISRAEL Phone: + 972 52 3965809 http://siamb.org.il The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture – Bamidgeh 58(1), 2006, 3-28.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor Of
    87 MARSH BULLETIN 13(2) September (2018) 87–99 Comparison of length-weight relationship and condition factor of redbelly tilapia Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848) from three different locations in Basra, Southern Iraq Majid M. Taher; Adel Y. Al-Dubakel; Sadiq J. Muhamed Aquaculture Unit – Agriculture College – Basrah University E-mail: [email protected] A B S T R A C T Current study was conducted in three locations, the first was floating fish cages, the second was fish earthen pond and the third was Shatt Al-Arab River north Basra Governorate at Hartha District. A total number of 266 fresh redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii) fishes were collected from the locations using different nets i.e. hand net in the first location and cast net in the second and third locations. The fishes transported to the laboratory of Aquaculture Unit in boxes with crushed ice. Samples were taken from 1/4/2017 to 1/10/2017. Water temperature during sampling period ranged between 17 to 31 °C and salinity between 1.1 to 3.2 ppt. The number of examined fish was 97, 92 and 77 from cages, pond and wild fish respectively. The mean fish total length varied between (16.60, 14.19 and 12.78) cm and weight varied between (109.42, 60.05 and 49.12) g for cages, pond and wild fish respectively. No fish recorded less than 5 cm or more than 25 cm. The values of the exponent 'b' in the length–weight relationship varied between 3.1655, 2.9596 and 2.9978 for cages, pond and wild fish respectively.
    [Show full text]