Saint Louis University Public Law Review Volume 34 Number 2 General Issue (Volume XXXIV, No. 2) Article 9 2015 Judicialization of Political Conflict: videnceE of Brown v. Board Of Education’s Effect in Newspaper Opinion Neal Allen Wichita State University, Department of Political Science,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/plr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Allen, Neal (2015) "Judicialization of Political Conflict: videnceE of Brown v. Board Of Education’s Effect in Newspaper Opinion," Saint Louis University Public Law Review: Vol. 34 : No. 2 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/plr/vol34/iss2/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Public Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICAL CONFLICT: EVIDENCE OF BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION’S EFFECT IN NEWSPAPER OPINION NEAL ALLEN* The United States Supreme Court, with its landmark racial integration case, Brown v. Board of Education,1 stimulated a heated debate in the editorial pages of Southern newspapers. This debate encompassed arguments not just about the rightness or wrongness of the decision, but also included discussion of the roles of courts, states, and law in the American constitutional system. For example, S.F. Moody of Birmingham, Alabama wrote on June 16, 1954 about the proper application of Article V, Section 4 of the US Constitution, the republican guarantee clause: A state is not a republic in which the ruler or group of rulers, dedicated to rule at will, can truly tell the subjects that the sovereignty resides in himself or the group possessed with the powers to rule.