BULLETIN DE L’INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE ENTOMOLOGIE, 80: 109-126, 2010 BULLETIN VAN HET KONINKLIJK BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN ENTOMOLOGIE, 80: 109-126, 2010

Catalogue of the types of the Cerambycoidea of the National Museum of Natural History of Luxembourg

by Francesco Vi t a l i

Abstract foreign entomologists, besides several acquisitions, are its original nucleus; nevertheless, the greater part A list of the types preserved in the National Museum of Natural History of this collection - and of the whole tropical material of Luxembourg (MNHNL) is provided. Lectotypes of Hastertia as well - is represented by the specimens collected by bougainvillei La m e e r e , 1912; Clinopleurus lansbergei La m e e r e , 1912; Oligoenoplus luzonicus Sc h w a r z e r , 1926; Jonthodes nodicollis Edouard-Pierre Luja (1875-1953). This Luxembourgian Hi n t z , 1919; Calanthemis aurescens Hi n t z , 1911; Chlorophorus explorer collected a lot of natural samples in Zambezi manillae var. aurivilliusi Sc h w a r z e r , 1926; Xylotrechus jordani (Mozambique), Belgian Congo (Democratic Republic Hi n t z , 1911; Pachydissus congolensis Hi n t z , 1911; Isosaphanus of the Congo), and Brazil between 1898 and 1924 ferranti Hi n t z , 1913; Metopotylus costatus Hi n t z , 1911; Xystrocera u j a metallica var. atripes Hi n t z , 1911; Xystrocera latipes Hi n t z , 1911; (L , 1918; 1951; 1953). He was a great friend of Xystrocera lujae Hi n t z , 1911; Velleda congolensis Hi n t z , 1911; Victor Ferrant (1856-1942), employee, curator and later Aderpas albomaculatus Hi n t z , 1913; Aderpas uniformis Hi n t z , director of the MNHNL from 1894 to 1942, and also 1913; Cyclocerus ferranti Hi n t z , 1911; Eumimetes griseus Hi n t z , he worked for Belgian companies. This explains why 1911; Protonarthron dubium Hi n t z , 1911; Eudryoctenes corticarius a lot of his material (including types) is also preserved Hi n t z , 1911 and Glenea congolensis Hi n t z , 1911 are designated in the MNHNL. Lectotypes of fasciata Hi n t z , 1912; Oxyhammus in the Royal Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels konduensis Hi n t z , 1913; Sternotomiella viridis Hi n t z , 1913; (IRSNB), the Royal Museum of Central Africa, Tervuren Pinacosternodes maculatus Hi n t z , 1913 and Pinacosternodes (MRACT) and the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin uniformis Hi n t z , 1913 are designated in the Royal Institute of Natural (MFNB). However, Luja’s material represents 55% of Sciences of Brussels. Hi n t z is recognised as the senior author of Hospes scutellaris and Jonthodes nodicollis. Jonthodes nodicollis the tropical Cerambycids of the MNHNL. Hi n t z , 1919 is transferred to the Hybunca Sc h m i d t , 1922, as Another great contribution to this collection (~41%) follows: Hybunca nodicollis (Hi n t z , 1919) n. comb. The following comes from the acquisitions of the Museum; the majority synonymies are established: Hospes nodicollis Bu r g e o n , 1931 nec of them are constituted by those that Ferrant did from Hi n t z , 1919 n. syn. and Hybunca nodicollis Bu r g e o n , 1931 nec 1910 to 1931 and the rest by the collection Kuntgen. Hi n t z , 1919 n. syn. Most specimens are supposed to have been purchased Key-words: Cerambycoidea, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle as identified from the catalogue Winkler, but Luja de Luxembourg, types, holotypes, lectotypes and Hintz are among the probable sellers as well. On the other hand, the collection Kuntgen (mostly Luja’s duplicates) constitutes less than 15% of the tropical Introduction collection of Cerambycids. The kind of labels present in such collection suggests that the were given by The collection of the tropical Cerambycoidea, with Luja during or after his Brazilian mission (1921-1924). over 3200 specimens representing nearly 900 identified A relatively small but important contribution (4.3%) species and subspecies, among which many types, is the to the tropical collection was made by Pierre Hastert, a highlight of the National Museum of Natural History of good Ferrant’s friend, while another part of the African Luxembourg (MNHNL). material came from Stanleyfalls (Boyoma Falls), Presently, it includes at least 161 types, of which directly donated by the Rev. R. P. H. Kohl or through 11 holotypes, 21 lectotypes, 20 paratypes and 61 the collection Hastert. Other important donations have paralectotypes and 48 syntypes. come from the French commandant Daniel Fouquet, Private donations of some Luxembourgian and who sent material from Vietnam, and from the German 110 F. Vi t a l i specialist E. Hintz, who donated (or likely exchanged) erroneously attributed some of Hintz’s determinations specimens coming from the German eastern Africa. to the remaining material of the Museum. In contrast, The majority of this material was collected just in the some types based on Luja’s material are well represented typical localities and in the years of the description of in the Belgian Museums (Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s , 1987; new species. Hence, it is about topotypes or sometimes Co o l s , 1993). So, it seems that Hintz received only a also paratypes. Finally, other important personalities of part of Luja’s material and directly from Luja, since he Science related to Ferrant sent him material of their own mentioned as types a number of specimens inferior to collections but no typical material. those actually present in the collections. Concerning the study of this collection, Fe r r a n t In some other cases, the labels on the bottom (1911) provided a detailed catalogue of all specialists of the box do not correspond to the pinned labels. involved in the determination, according to the studied The new identifications sometimes are taxonomic taxonomic group. Regarding the Cerambycids, he changes according to the taxonomy used at Ferrant’s quoted A. Lameere and P. Boppe, who were describing times, sometimes are different (right or erroneous) new Prioninae, and E. Hintz, to whom Ferrant accredited identifications, and sometimes are misspellings. In all the description of more than 20 new African species. cases, I attributed the new identification to Ferrant, who Actually, Hintz identified the majority of the organised the collection and wrote the labels, even if Cerambycids and nearly all African species, while only a I have no proofs whether someone else suggested the small part (6.5%) of the remaining materials, especially new name. the American or Asian species, were identified by Some of these misunderstandings also concern the B. Schwarzer between 1925 and 1931. types (both paratypes and holotypes) present in the Nonetheless, the relationship among the different collection. Most of them were identified at Ferrant’s time Museums, Luja and Hintz still presents some obscure and carry red labels of “type” or “cotype”, presumably aspects. for holotypes and for paratypes, respectively. Actually, Firstly, it is unclear who the owner of the material the checking up of the collection of the MNHNL and sent to Hintz was. It seems that Hintz received such IRSNB has evidenced that a certain number of presumed material directly from Luja, since in his papers he never types were misidentified since such specimens have not mentioned any Museums. This might be confirmed by been quoted as types, their sizes or localities being not the fact that the material collected at Kondué has the mentioned in the original descriptions. same identical labels, though it is preserved in different Possibly, Ferrant and other curators erroneously Museums (MNHNL, IRSNB or MRACT). This makes identified as types a number of specimens greater than think that it is about material labelled by Luja and later ones that Hintz had really observed, not having verified entrusted to different Museums. Nonetheless, the IRSNB the original descriptions; nonetheless, some facts preserved some Hintz’s types coming from Kondué but suggest a quite different interpretation. Such presumed having locality labels hand-written by Hintz, suggesting types have overall a big number of Hintz’s autographed that Hintz did not receive either labelled or even prepared labels; moreover, according to the labels of origin, Hintz material as well. described most of the types, when they already belonged Moreover, Hintz dedicated four new species to to the MNHNL. Nonetheless, he always mentioned Ferrant (Gu i n e t , 2002) and Fe r r a n t himself (1911) Luja as owner of the types, though he also dedicated quoted that Hintz was describing some new species some species to Ferrant. On the other hand, Luja was for the MNHNL. Correspondingly, the labels of origin in the embarrassing situation to be Luxembourgian and that Ferrant got under each specimen often refer a a good Ferrant’s friend but also employee for Belgian date of arrival to the MNHNL anterior to that of the companies in Belgian colonies. Accordingly, Hintz did descriptions. Nonetheless, the determination labels not mention the real owner of the types, leaving Luja hand-written by Hintz have dates from 1914 to 1917, the duty to entrust them to the museums. Later, since or none. These last labels, which are also the largest 1913 Hintz no longer indicated the exact number of the majority, include also types that Hi n t z (1911, 1912, types, making virtually impossible their recognition. 1913, 1919) simply mentioned as “collection Luja”. This hypothesis can explain why the number of Even the species dedicated to Ferrant were mentioned the types of each species is singularly similar in both as of “Coll. Luja”. MNHNL and IRSNB. Naturally, no proofs support these Thirdly, some determinations are actually erroneous. supposed events, which nevertheless, if they have really Since it is about similar but not identical species, occurred, show a great example of friendship between sometimes also Hintz’s new species, it seems that Ferrant ancient men of Science, which overpasses times and Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 111 nationalities. List of the types However, the number and the identity of the types is sometimes doubtful, since Hintz did not always indicate Family Disteniidae Th o m s o n , 1860 their exact number or since the total amount of the Subfamily Disteniinae Th o m s o n , 1860 specimens labelled as type in both MNHNL and IRSNB Tribe Disteniini Th o m s o n , 1860 sometimes exceed the number of mentioned types. Moreover, some other syntypes are apparently present Saphanodes lujae Hi n t z , 1913 HOLOTYPE (Fig. 1) in the collection Kuntgen or in other Museums. Since Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Hintz always indicated Luja as owner of the types, this Saphanodes lujae m[ihi ], det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂. problem might be solved through the examination of the epistolary documents between the Luxembourgian explorer and such museums; nonetheless, I could trace Family Cerambycidae La t r e i ll e , 1802 them in no museum. Subfamily Prioninae La t r e i ll e , 1802 The ICZN recommends the fixation of lectotypes; Tribe Macrotomini Th o m s o n , 1860 so, in order to accomplish this task, I tried to identify the specimen that Hintz himself selected as holotype. Hastertia bougainvillei La m e e r e , 1912 LECTOTYPE I observed that only one syntype has often a pink label and PARALECTOTYPE (Fig. 2) of “type”, not belonging to the usual labels of the [Papua,], Bougainville, P. Hastert don. 1913, Hastertia MNHNL and IRSNB, which Hintz presumably added Bougainvillei det. A. Lameere, Type, 1♂1♀; ditto, acq. to the specimen. Therefore, in order to avoid disputes, 1927, Hastertia Bougainvillei Lameere, 1♂1♀. I adopted the method to select as lectotype the type having that pinned pink label and as paralectotypes all Re m a r k s : La m e e r e (1912) described this species on a remaining syntypes. In the rare cases, when all syntypes male and two females from Bougainville (coll. Hastert) were deprived of such labels, I selected as lectotype the and two females from Kieta (MFNB). The second male or the better-conserved specimen; nevertheless, in female of Hastert’s collection is apparently lost. The those cases where further specimens having a pink label only existing male type, belonging to the MNHNL, is were supposed to exist, I renounced to the designation here formally designated as lectotype, while the female, of the lectotype. as well the ones preserved in Berlin, is designated as Other cerambycids appear to be the types of some paralectotype. The other two specimens are topotypes. species that Sc h w a r z e r described in 1926. Actually, no proof of this fact is present in the collection; Clinopleurus lansbergei La m e e r e , 1912 LECTOTYPE nonetheless, these specimens show an extraordinary and PARALECTOTYPES (Fig. 3) series of coincidences with such types: they arrived at the [Papua,], Bougainville, P. Hastert don. 1913, Museum in 1925 coming from the same exact localities Clinopleurus Lansbergei det. A. Lameere, Type, and corresponding to the original descriptions in all 2♂♂2♀♀; without locality [probably, Bougainville], features. On the other side, Sc h w a r z e r did not indicate acq. 1926, Clinopleurus Lansbergei Lameere, 1♂. the collection where the types were preserved but surely, he identified several specimens of the MNHNL at the Re m a r k s : La m e e r e (1912) described this species on an same time he wrote the descriptions. Moreover, such undetermined number of specimens from Bougainville types are not preserved in MFNB (Wi l l e r s , in litt.) and preserved in the collection Hastert and in the IRSNB. no further ancient specimen of such species has been Four syntypes of the collection Hastert are currently known until recent times (Hü d e p o h l , 1992). Hence, it present in the MNHNL, while only another syntype is seems reasonable to identify these specimens as types. preserved in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u † & Co o l s , 1987). Finally, a small number of specimens carry the I designate as lectotype the male specimen measuring label of type and a specific (or even generic!) epithet 80 mm (up the apex of the mandibles) missing the that are not present in the bibliography. These species anterior right leg, the left mesotarsus and the right were actually never described; hence, they must be metatarsus. All remaining syntypes are designated as considered as nomina nuda or nomina museala, even paralectotypes. if Hintz identified them as new species. Some nomina Ma r a z z i & Ma r a z z i (2006) transferred this species nuda by K. M. Heller, without indication of type and to the genus Xixuthrus Th o m s o n , 1864. moreover, coming from purchased material, are present in the MNHNL as well. 112 F. Vi t a l i

Tribe Meroscelisini Th o m s o n , 1860 them have the pink label of type. Hence, I designate as lectotype a male specimen missing the posterior left leg Closterus promissiramis Gi l m o u r , 1962 and the last left antennomere. The other two specimens = Closterus ferrandi La m e e r e in litteris are designated as paralectotypes. Madagascar, acquistion 1922, Closterus Ferrandi In all likelihood, the species was described as Holotypus [in litt.], det. A. Lameere 1921, 1♂. Jonthodes since it has an elytral pattern analogue to that of J. formosa; nevertheless, it clearly belongs to the Subfamily Cerambycinae La t r e i ll e , 1802 genus Hybunca, which Sc h m i d t described only in 1922. Tribe Anaglyptini La c o r d a i r e , 1869 Actually, it shows the same pattern of H. chrysogramma baromabana Schmidt, 1922 from Cameroon but it has Oligoenoplus luzonicus Sc h w a r z e r , 1926 LECTOTYPE an unusual smooth pronotum. and PARALECTOTYPE (Fig. 4-5) Both Sc h m i d t (1922) and Bu r g e o n (1931) ignored [Philippines,], Luzon, Mt. Banahao, acq. 1925, Ceresium Hintz’s species, which the latter author described again raripilum [det. V. Ferrant?], Newm. 1♂; [Philippines,], on isotopotypical specimens, even using the same Luzon, Imugan, acq. 1925, Oligoenoplus luzonicus [det. specific epithet. V. Ferrant?], 1♀.

Re m a r k s : Both specimens of the MNHNL had no la- Hospes scutellaris Hi n t z , 1919 SYNTYPE bel of either type or determination; nonetheless, they = Hospes scutellaris Bu r g e o n , 1931 nec Hi n t z , 1919 show a striking similarity with the types mentioned in n. syn. the introduction (cfr. Sc h w a r z e r , 1926), which leads to = Hospes nigripes Hi n t z in litteris recognise them as the types of Oligoenoplus luzonicus. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, According to the usual conventions, the male is fixed Hospes scutellaris m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♀; ditto, as lectotype (holotype) and the female as paralectotype 1♂2♀♀; ditto, Hospes nigripes m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, (allotype). Type, 2♂♂1♀. Though Hü d e p o h l (1992) inserted this species among the Clytini, it actually belongs to the Anaglyptini Re m a r k s : Besides the specimens preserved in the (Au r i v i l l i u s , 1912). MNHNL, three other paratypes are present in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s , 1987). None of them has the pink label of type, and no other specimen is present Tribe Callichromatini Bl a n c h a r d , 1845 in the MFNB (Wi l l e r s , in litt.). Actually, the description only quotes a length of 13 mm, but the number of the Hybunca nodicollis (Hi n t z , 1919) n. comb. types is unknown. All presumed types of both MNHNL and IRSNB reach such size; however, all are females. LECTOTYPE and PARALECTOTYPES (Fig. 6) Hence, they must be considered as syntypes. = Jonthodes nodicollis Hi n t z , 1916 nomen nudum In all likelihood, Hospes nigripes should indicate = Jonthodes nodicollis Hi n t z , 1919 orig. comb. specimens characterised by black, rather than violet = Hybunca nodicollis Bu r g e o n , 1931 nec Hi n t z , 1919 femoral club. The species is actually nomen nudum; n. syn. however, it does not seem specifically different from Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, scutellaris. Jonthodes nodicollis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, 3♂♂2♀♀; Both Sc h m i d t (1922) and Bu r g e o n (1931) ignored ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Jonthodes nodicollis Hintz [det. Hintz’s species, which the latter author described again A. Kuntgen], 2♂♂. on isotopotypical specimens, even using the same name. Re m a r k s : Hi n t z (1916) mentioned Jonthodes nodicollis from Mawambi (Democratic Republic of the Congo) three years before its description. The species was really Rhopalizus euporidus Jo r d a n , 1894 described only in 1919, apparently on an undetermined = Rhopalizus brevicornis Hi n t z in litteris number of specimens, 19 mm long, coming from Kondué. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Both specimens of the IRSNB overpass 20 mm, while Rhopalizus brevicornis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♀. three specimens preserved in the MNHNL have the characters of the original description, though none of Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 113

Tribe Cerambycini La t r e i ll e , 1802 both median legs. The other syntype is preserved in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s , 1987) and must be Pachydissus congolensis Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE deemed as paralectotype. and PARALECTOTYPE? Fe r r a n t (1911) and He u e r t z (1954) quoted this = Pachydiscus (sic!) congolensis (Hi n t z ) Fe r r a n t , 1911 species as “Xylotrechus aurescens”, though this species misspelling was never used in this combination. Probably, it is about Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, a nomen in litteris that Ferrant received from Hintz in a Pachydissus congolensis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂; first step of his description. ditto, 7♂♂3♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Pachydissus congolensis Hintz [det. A. Kuntgen], 2♂♂1♀. Chlorophorus manillae var. aurivilliusi Sc h w a r z e r , Remarks. Fe r r a n t (1911) and He u e r t z (1954) mentio- 1926 LECTOTYPE and PARALECTOTYPE (Fig. 7) ned this species as Pachydiscus (sic!) congolensis. [Philippines,], Mindanao, Kolambugan, acq. 1925, According to Ad l b a u e r (2002), P. congolensis is a 1♂1♀. younger synonym of Pachydissus regius Aurivillius, 1906 and both congolensis-types belong to the MFNB. Re m a r k s : As for Oligoenoplus luzonicus, both Nonetheless, this attribution is surely erroneous. In specimens have either label of neither type nor fact, Fe r r a n t (1911) mentioned P. congolensis among determination; nonetheless, they show a notable series the species that Hintz had described for the MNHNL. of correspondences with the types. Sc h w a r z e r (1926) Moreover, all specimens from Kondué mentioned in did not indicate the collection where the types were the original description belong to the collection Luja. preserved, the size or the number of specimens either; Hence, the way in they could be preserved at the MFNB therefore, no element contrasts with the fact that such is unexplainable. Finally, such presumed “types” have specimens belong to the typical series. According to the label “Pachydissus congolensis m. E. Hintz det. the usual conventions, the male is fixed as lectotype 192” (Ad l b a u e r , 2002), which clearly implies a label (holotype) and the female as paralectotype (allotype). pre-printed in 1920, while this species was described Au r i v i l l i u s (1928) considered this variety as a species, in 1911. Evidently, those specimens must be deemed as emending its specific epithet inaurivilli. simple topotypes. On the other side, a male specimen preserved in the MNHNL has all features quoted in the original Xylotrechus jordani Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and description and the label “m. det. Hintz”, besides the PARALECTOTYPES pink label. A female specimen having the features of Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. the allotype has the red label of type; nonetheless, three 1907, Xylotrechus Jordani m[ihi] det. E. Hintz Type, other “types” are preserved in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u 5♂♂2♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Xylotrechus Jordani & Co o l s , 1987), while only two types were mentioned Hintz [det. A. Kuntgen], 1♀. in the original description. In conclusion, while the identification of the paralectotype remains doubtful, the Re m a r k s : Hi n t z mentioned only six types and other male specimen having the pink label of type (MNHNL) two syntypes are present in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u & must be considered as lectotype. Co o l s , 1987). Hence, only four specimens belonging to the MNHNL can be deemed as syntypes. I selected the specimen carrying Hintz’s determination Tribe Clytini Mu l s a n t , 1839 label and the pink label of type as lectotype. This specimen is a labelled female, 13 mm long, missing Calanthemis aurescens Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE the right antenna except for the scape. Other three = Xylotrechus aurescens (Hi n t z ) Fe r r a n t , 1911 specimens, as well both preserved in the IRSNB, are Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, designated as paralectotypes. The remaining four Calanthemis aurescens m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂. specimens are topotypes.

Re m a r k s : Hi n t z mentioned two specimens as types; the one preserved at the MNHNL has Hintz’s autograph label Tribe Obriini Mu l s a n t , 1839 and the pink label of type; therefore, it is deemed as the lectotype. It is a labelled male 10.5 mm long, missing Nosoeme curvipes Hi n t z , 1911 PARATYPES 114 F. Vi t a l i

Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. Tribe Tillomorphini La c o r d a i r e , 1869 1907, Nosoeme curvipes m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, 3♂♂1♀; ditto, Nosoeme sp. det. Hintz, Nosoeme curvipes Hintz Centrotoclytus helleri Sc h w a r z e r , 1926 HOLOTYPE [det. V. Ferrant], 1♂1♀. (Fig. 10) [Philippines,], Mindanao, Momungen, acq. 1925, Re m a r k s : Ma r t i n s (1977) synonymised this species Centrotoclytus Helleri, 1♂. with Hypomares brunneus (Thomson, 1858) comparing the holotype (MFNB) and two cotypes belonging to the Re m a r k s : The specimen has no label of either type or Deutsche Entomologische Institut, Eberswalde. The determination; however, it shows an impressive series holotype corresponds to the first specimen mentioned of correspondences with the type already noticed in the in the original description; while apparently four of introduction. Though Sc h w a r z e r (1926) did not indicate the remaining six types (coll. Luja) are present in the the collection where the type was preserved, the present MNHNL, as other ones mentioned in the same paper. specimen in the MNHNL is here formally recognised as According to Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s (1987) other two the holotype of Centrotoclytus helleri. syntypes are preserved in the IRSNB; hence, only two specimens of MNHNL should be considered as paratypes. Tribe Xystrocerini Bl a n c h a r d , 1845 Other two unidentified specimens, measuring less than 16 mm and hence not belonging to the typical Antennoeme quadriplagiata Hi n t z , 1911 PARATYPES series, were identified as the same species in subsequent = Iquitosternum apicale Hi n t z in litteris times, possibly by Ferrant. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Antennoeme quadriplagiata m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, 4♀♀; ditto, Iquitosternum apicale Hintz [in litt.], 8m; ditto, Tribe Plectogasterini Qu e n t i n & Vi ll i e r s , 1969 coll. A. Kuntgen, Antennoeme quadriplagiata Jord. (sic!) [det. A. Kuntgen], 4♂♂8f. Neoclosterus ferranti Bo p p e , 1912 HOLOTYPE (Fig. 8) Re m a r k s : Four specimens of MNHNL have the Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, label “m[ihi] det. E. Hintz” corresponding in size Neoclosterus Ferranti Boppe, P. Boppe vid[it], Type, (12-16 mm) to the six specimens of the collection Neoclosterus lujae Boppe var. det. Quentin & Villiers Luja that Hi n t z quoted as types of A. quadriplagiata. 1969, 1♂. Since the first specimen mentioned in the original description (Mawambi am Ituri) does not belong to the Re m a r k s : Qu e n t i n & Vi l l i e r s (1969) considered this MNHNL but possibly to the MFNB, the remaining five species as a simple variety of Neoclosterus lujae Bo p p e , specimens coming from Kondué might be recognised as 1912. the paratypes of A. quadriplagiata. According to Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s (1987) other two syntypes are preserved in the IRSNB; nonetheless, one Neoclosterus opacipennis Bo p p e , 1912 HOLOTYPE specimen does not reach even 11 mm; hence only one (Fig. 9) specimen preserved in the IRSNB can be considered as Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, paratype. In contrast, the four specimens of the MNHNL Neoclosterus opacipennis Bo p p e , P. Boppe vid[it], Type, should be considered as paratypes. 1♀. It is remarkable that Hi n t z firstly identified the males of this species as “Iquitosternum apicale” two taxa that Re m a r k s : According to Qu e n t i n & Vi l l i e r s (1969) he never described. Curiously, this species is indicated as all Boppe’s species were described as belonging “quadriplagiata Jord.” in the box labels of the Museum to Plectogaster; actually, they were described as and that of the collection Kuntgen. Neoclosterus (Bo p p e , 1912). Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 115

Isosaphanus ferranti Hi n t z , 1913 LECTOTYPE (Fig. Xystrocera latipes Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and 11) PARALECTOTYPES = Isophanus (sic!) Ferranti (Hi n t z ) Fe r r a n t , 1911 Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, misspelling Xystrocera latipes m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 8♀♀; = Isoseptanus (sic!) ferranti (Hi n t z ) He u e r t z , 1954 ditto, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Xystrocera misspelling latipes Hi n t z , 1♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Xystrocera Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. latipes Hi n t z [det. A. Kuntgen], 2♀♀. 1907, Isosaphanus Ferranti m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, Isoseptanus (sic!) ferranti Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], 1♂; Re m a r k s : One of the seven specimens that Hi n t z ditto, 2♂♂. mentioned as X. trivittata was later identified by Hi n t z himself as var. lateralis. Hi n t z described this species Re m a r k s : Hi n t z (1913) described Isosaphanus as on eight specimens (5♂♂3♀♀) measuring 14-20 mm; related to Saphanodes Hi n t z , 1913 and Metopotylus nonetheless, all eight specimens present in the MNHNL Qu e d e n f e l d t , 1882. Actually, the former genus belongs are females. Moreover, according to Da m o i s e a u & to the Disteniidae and the latter to the Cerambycinae Co o l s (1987), seven other syntypes (4♂♂2♀♀ + 1 Xystrocerini. The examination of this genus suggests destructed ♂) are present in the IRSNB. Actually, only instead a closer relation with Oemodana Ga h a n , 1904, both females correspond to the description, while the from which it can be distinguished in the smooth (rather other ones belong to the typical form. Moreover, no than granulate) scape and the long pubescent (rather specimen belonging to this form is a male, corresponding than calve) pronotum. to the fact that Hi n t z quoted “antennis brevibus” and This species was described on a pair, but only the furnished only chromatic characters (green or blue) in male belongs to the MNHNL, while the other type is order to separate the sexes. preserved in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s , 1987). Only six of the eight females present in the MNHNL Hence, the male, moreover having the determination can be considered as syntypes. Among them, the label, is designated as lectotype, that is preserved specimen having the pink label of type (MNHNL) in the IRSNB (unfortunately strongly damaged) as should be designated as lectotype. It is a pinned female, paralectotype. The remaining males are topotypes. 20 mm long, missing both hind claws; the remaining Fe r r a n t (1911) mentioned this species as “Isophanus five females, as well both specimens in the IRSNB, are Ferranti” before its description and inserted it in the considered paralectotypes. collection among the Callichromatini, adding a label Br e u n i n g (1957) considered this species as a form “Isoseptanus ferranti”. Still He u e r t z (1954) and of X. frontalis Thomson, 1858, while Ma r t i n s (1980) of Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s (1987) quoted this species using X. fulvipes Thomson, 1858. such misspellings.

Xystrocera lujae Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and Metopotylus costatus Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE (Fig. PARALECTOTYPES 12) Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1911, Xystrocera Lujae m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 5♂♂2♀♀; Metopotylus costatus m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂. ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Xystrocera Lujae Hintz [det. A. Kuntgen], 4♂♂1♀; Congo belge, Ituri, 1♀. Re m a r k s : Hi n t z mentioned two specimens as types. The one preserved at the MNHNL has Hintz’s autograph Re m a r k s : The holotype and six specimens, which Hi n t z label as the other one present in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u mentioned as cotypes, are currently perfectly preserved & Co o l s , 1987), which also have the pink label of type. in the MNHNL. Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s (1987) quoted This latter type misses head, antennae, and all legs other four syntypes preserved in the IRSNB. Since except for both mesofemora; hence, it is too poorly Hi n t z described Xystrocera lujae on the basis of eleven preserved to be a valid lectotype. Consequently, the specimens, all specimens currently exist. specimen preserved in the MNHNL is designated as The lectotype, having the pink label of type, is lectotype. It is a labelled male 13 mm long, missing the designated in the MNHNL: it is a pinned male, 25 left mesotarsus and the left hind leg. mm, long, missing the right median leg. The remaining Le p e s m e & Br e u n i n g (1956a) transferred this species syntypes in both MNHNL and IRSNB are designated to the new genus Millotsaphanidius. as paralectotypes, while the other specimens belonging 116 F. Vi t a l i to the collection Kuntgen must be considered as Velleda congolensis Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and topotypes. PARALECTOTYPES = Veleda (sic!) congolensis (Hi n t z ) Fe r r a n t , 1911 misspelling Xystrocera metallica var. atripes Hi n t z , 1911 Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. LECTOTYPE 1907, Velleda congolensis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, 2♂♂4♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Velleda congolensis Xystrocera metallica v. atripes m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, Hi n t z [det. A. Kuntgen], 1♂1♀. 1♂1♀; ditto, Xystrocera metallica Qu e d ., 3♂♂1♀. Re m a r k s : Six of the seven specimens on which Hi n t z Re m a r k s : Br e u n i n g (1957) considered this form as a described this species seem to be present in the MNHNL; variety of Xystrocera asperata Thomson, 1858. nonetheless, Da m o i s e a u & Co o l s (1987) quoted other Hi n t z quoted two females in the original description, two syntypes preserved in the IRSNB. Actually, another though the specimens just having the label of type and specimen preserved in the IRSNB (ex coll. Hintz) might the characters of this form (black legs) are actually a pair. be a syntype as well. Another syntype is present in the IRSNB (Da m o i s e a u & Though Hi n t z selected no holotype, the specimen Co o l s , 1987). Both syntypes have no pink label of type, carrying the pink label of type (MNHNL) is designated but the one preserved in the IRSNB is damaged, missing as lectotype. Such specimen is a labelled female, 8 mm one leg and most part of the right antenna; therefore, the long, missing of the right protarsus. female of the MNHNL is designated as lectotype and The remaining five specimens of the MNHNL the one of the IRSNB as paralectotype. It is a pinned and the one of the IRSNB should be considered as specimen, 28 mm long, missing the right protarsus. paralectotypes. Hi n t z described this species as a representative of Phrissomini, but Br e u n i n g (1954) transferred it to the Subfamily La t r e i ll e , 1825 Acanthocinini, instituting the new genus Falsovelleda. Tribe Acanthocinini Bl a n c h a r d , 1845

Eoporis (Eoporimimus) bifasciana Sc h w a r z e r , 1925 Tribe Acmocerini Th o m s o n , 1864 SYNTYPE Formosa, Fuhosho, H. Sauter [lgt.], acq. 1924, Acmocera albofasciata Hi n t z , 1911 PARATYPES Eoporimimus bifascianus Sc h w r . Type! [handwritten Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, by. B. Schwarzer], Eoporimimus bifascianus Sc h w . det. Acmocera albofasciata m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type [= S. Breuning [1950], 1♂. paratype], 6♂♂; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Acmocera albofasciata Hi n t z , 7♂♂. Re m a r k s : Sc h w a r z e r (1925) described this species from an undetermined number of specimens, 9-12 mm long, Re m a r k s : Hi n t z mentioned as types a pair coming from having the following labels: “Fuhosho, 7.VII; 7.VIII; Ituri, which must be considered as holotype and allotype. 7.IX; Sokutso, 7.XII.1912”. Afterwards, he mentioned “a number of specimens” He described this species as belonging to of the Luja collection, feebly different in the pattern Eoporimimus, a new subgenus of Eoporis Pa s c o e , 1824 but belonging to the same species, which must be that he himself instituted in the same paper; nonetheless, considered as paratypes. Eleven specimens are present the specimen preserved in the MNHNL has a handwritten in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993), while only six specimens label indicating “Eoporimimus bifascianus Type”. of the MNHNL have the label of type. However, the The MNHNL purchased this specimen in 1924 and seven specimens of the collection Kuntgen, deriving Schwarzer never published such combination. The only from collection Luja in subsequent years, must be explanation is that originally, Schwarzer had intention considered as paratypes as well. to describe this new species as belonging to a new genus Br e u n i n g & Té o c c h i (1979) considered this species but later, he changed idea, declassing Eoporimimus to as a subspecies of Acmocera conjux Thomson, 1858. subgenus level. In all likelihood, the present specimen is one of the first, or even the first specimen of this species, that Schwarzer observed. Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 117

Tribe Aderpasini Br e u n i n g & Té o c c h i , 1977 Aderpas uniformis Hi n t z , 1913 LECTOTYPE and PARALECTOTYPES Aderpas congolensis Hi n t z , 1913 HOLOTYPE (Fig. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, 13) Aderpas uniformis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂2♀♀. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1904, Aderpas congolensis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂; Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from an Congo belge, Sankuru, 1901, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. undetermined number of specimens from Kondué 1904, 1♀. measuring between 8 and 11 mm. I select as lectotype the specimen carrying the Re m a r k s : According to Co o l s (1993), a syntype is pink label of type and belonging to the MNHNL. It present in the IRSNB; nonetheless, Hi n t z did not is a labelled female, 10 mm long, missing the right mention the number of the types and provided only antenna except for scape and pedicle, the last five left one size (11 mm). Hence, it is uncertain whether such antennomeres, the left hind legs, and the right hind claw. specimen is really a type. It is only 10 mm long; hence, The remaining two specimens carrying the red labels of it cannot be considered as a type. types put by Ferrant, and both syntypes preserved at the In contrast, the specimen preserved in the MNHNL IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993), both without pink label of type, reaches such size, has Hintz’s autograph label and are designated as paralectotypes. the pink label of type; therefore, it is deemed as the Aderpas uniformis was considered as a species holotype. (Br e u n i n g , 1938), as a morph of A. subfasciatus Jo r d a n , This species was considered as a synonym of 1894 (Br e u n i n g & Té o c c h i , 1977) and finally as a morph A. brunneus (Th o m s o n , 1858) (Br e u n i n g , 1938), as a of A. lineolatus subfasciatus (Té o c c h i , 2001). valid species (Br e u n i n g & Té o c c h i , 1977) and finally as a subspecies of A. quadricostatus Hi n t z , 1913 (Té o c c h i et alii, 2004). However, it does not result that none of Tribe La c o r d a i r e , 1869 such authors ever checked the holotype. Cyclocerus ferranti Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and PARALECTOTYPES Aderpas albomaculatus Hi n t z , 1913 LECTOTYPE and Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja [lgt.], PARALECTOTYPES E. Luja don. 1907, Cyclocerus Ferranti m[ihi] det. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. E. Hintz, Type, 2♂♂1♀, ditto, 1♂. 1907, Aderpas albomaculatus m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 3♂♂4♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Aderpas Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on two pairs albomaculatus, cotype, [det. A. Kuntgen], 2♂♂4♀♀. measuring 15-18 mm: Four specimens seem to be currently well preserved in the MNHNL; while two other Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from an syntypes are claimed by the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). undetermined number of specimens from Kondué The specimen having the pink label of type measuring between 7 and 12 mm. Br e u n i n g (1938) (MNHNL) must be considered as lectotype. It is a synonymised this species with Aderpas griseus pinned male, 18 mm long, missing the half of the last (Th o m s o n , 1858). right antennomere. The female has also the pink label of I select as lectotype the specimen having the pink type; hence, it is a paralectotype. Though figured in the label of type (MNHNL). It is a labelled female, 11 mm original description, the male preserved in the IRSNB long, missing the left antenna except for the scape, the has no pink label of type; hence, it must be considered as last two right antennomeres, and the right metatarsus. paralectotype. In contrast, a female of the IRSNB comes The other six specimens, having the red labels of type from Kassai; consequently, it cannot be considered as a put by Ferrant, the specimens of the collection Kuntgen syntype, while another male preserved in the MNHNL and the five syntypes preserved in the IRSNB (Co o l s , must be deemed as paralectotype. 1993), all without a pink label of type, are designated as Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) synonymised Cyclocerus ferranti paralectotypes. with macropus Jordan, 1903. Possibly, Hi n t z did not notice that this species had already been described since he identified it as a representative of the Acanthoderini. Actually, this genus is a very unusual representative of the Ancylonotini. 118 F. Vi t a l i

Paroeax schoutedeni Br e u n i n g , 1935 The only specimen with Hintz’s autograph label = sellatus Hi n t z in litteris preserved in the MNHNL has no pink label of type as Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, all syntypes preserved in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). Idactus sellatus m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type [in litt.], Another specimen with the same locality label is 1♂1♀. present in the MNHNL, but it does not seem that Hintz examined it too, as well the nine remaining topotypical Re m a r k s : Hi n t z identified this species as being new specimens. However, none of the examined syntypes but he did not describe it. The species was in fact new come from Gabon, though two specimens labelled but it was later described by Br e u n i n g from a different as such are present in the IRSNB. Consequently, the locality of Congo. identification of the true types, besides the lectotypes, remains doubtful.

Phloeus brevis Jo r d a n , 1903 = latus Hi n t z in litteris Dichostates quadrisignatus Hi n t z , 1912 SYNTYPES Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], 1914, Dichostathes Oeax latus m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type [in litt.], 1♀. quadrisignatus m[ihi] det. Hintz, type, 2♂♂2♀♀.

Re m a r k s : Hi n t z identified this species as being new Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from an but he did not describe it. Actually, Jo r d a n had already undetermined number of specimens coming from described this species as belonging to a different genus. Kondué and measuring 10-12 mm. Four syntypes are preserved in the MNHNL and other two in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). Nevertheless, Tribe Ceroplesini Th o m s o n , 1860 none of the specimens preserved in the MNHNL has the pink label of type, as well the one preserved in the Pycnopsis brachypteroides Hi n t z , 1910 PARATYPES IRSNB. D[eutsche] O[st], Afr[ika], [= Tanzania], Lukuledi, Pycnopsis brachypteroides m[ihi] det. E. Hintz [1910], Cotype, E. Hintz don. 1912, 1♂1♀; D[eutsche] Ost Crossotofrea lineata Hi n t z , 1913 SYNTYPES Afrika [= Tanzania], Lindi, [19]03, E. Hintz don. 1912, Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Pycnopsis brachypteroides det. E. Hintz 1916, 1♂1♀. Crossotofrea lineata m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 2♀♀.

Re m a r k s : Hi n t z (1910) described bracypteroides as Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on an undeter- a true species, while Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) considered it mined number of specimens from Kondué measuring as a simple variety of P. brachyptera Thomson, 1860. between 11 and 12 mm. Two syntypes are present in the Finally, Br e u n i n g (1937) considered it as no variety MNHNL and two other in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993), either. but none of the specimens preserved in both MNHNL Two paratypes are present in the MNHNL. and IRSNB has the pink label of type. According to Br e u n i n g (1942) this species belongs to Frea sg. Crossotofrea. Tribe Th o m s o n , 1864

Dichostates flavomaculatus Hi n t z , 1912 SYNTYPE? Crossotofrea trilineata Hi n t z , 1913 SYNTYPES Congo belge, Kondué, 1904, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, 1907, Dichostates flavomaculatus m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, (Frea) trilineata m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, type, 3♂♂2♀♀; Type, 1♂; ditto, Dichostathes flavopictus Qued. [det. ditto, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Frea tuberculata V. Ferrant], 1♀; Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], Aur. det. E. Hintz, 1♀. E. Luja don. 1907, 2♂♂1♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, 5♂♂1♀. Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described Crossotofrea trilineata on an undetermined number of specimens from Kondué and Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on only four Bipindi (Cameroon). Br e u n i n g (1942) synonymised it specimens coming from Kondué and Gabon, 12-14 mm with Frea (Crossotofrea) unifasciata (Th o m s o n , 1858). long. Presently, five syntypes and a topotype, which Hintz Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 119 wrongly identified as Frea tuberculata, are present in is unknown. The other specimens must be considered the MNHNL, while other two are present in the IRSNB as topotypes. according to Co o l s (1993). Actually, in the IRSNB are Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) considered this species as a present another specimen coming from Bipindi (1888, variety of F. maculicornis Thomson, 1858, while G. Zenker lgt., Breuning det. 1952) and other two Pl a v i l s t s h i k o v (1927) replaced this name with hintzi, coming from Kondué (coll. Hintz), which are formally fasciata Hintz, 1912 being preoccupied by fasciata recognised as syntypes as well. None of the specimens Brancsik, 1893. preserved in both MNHNL and IRSNB has the pink label of type; hence, the lectotype cannot be identified. Frea zambesiana Hi n t z , 1912 SYNTYPES Zambèze [= Mozambique], M. Morrumbala, 1899, Eumimetes griseus Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1902, Frea Zambesiana PARALECTOTYPE m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 2♂♂2♀♀. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Eumimetes griseus m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Types, Frea Re m a r k s : Hi n t z (1912) described this species from grisescens Aur. 2♂♂2♀♀; ditto, Mimofrea grisea det. 13 specimens coming from M. Morrumbala (actually, E. Hintz, 1♀. collected in 1901). Four syntypes are present in the MNHNL and another one is preserved in the IRSNB, Re m a r k s : Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) replaced E. griseus with though Co o l s (1993) claimed the presence of two types. Frea grisescens, it being preoccupied by secondary Nonetheless, none of the observed specimens has the homonymy. pink label of type. All four specimens described by Hi n t z seem to be present in the MNHNL, but two other syntypes are preserved in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). I select as Freopsis albomaculata Hi n t z , 1912 SYNTYPE lectotype the specimen of the MNHNL carrying the Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, pink label of type. It is a labelled male, 11 mm long, Freopsis albomaculata Hintz Type, 1♀. missing the left median claw. The status of the remaining specimens is unknown, Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from three though at least one specimen of the MNHNL must be specimens coming from Kondué. One specimen is considered as paralectotype. The specimen identified as present in the MNHNL, another one in the IRSNB Mimofrea grisea is a topotype. (Co o l s , 1993), and a last one is possibly in the MRACT (Br e u n i n g , 1942). The only specimen with Hintz’s autograph label Frea fasciata Hi n t z , 1912 PARALECTOTYPES does not have the pink label of type too; hence, it can be Congo belge, Kondué, 1904, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja identified as paralectotype. The specimen of IRSNB has don. 1907, Frea maculicornis Th o m s ., 1♂; Congo no pink label of type as well. belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Frea Br e u n i n g (1942) considered this species as a maculicornis v. fasciata m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, cotype, synonym of Freopsis leucostictica (Wh i t e , 1858). 3♀♀; ditto, Frea maculicornis Th o m s ., 1♂2♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Frea maculicornis Th. [det. A. Kuntgen], 4♂♂7♀♀. Tribe Dorcaschematini Th o m s o n , 1860

Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on nine Protonarthron dubium Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and specimens coming from Kondué measuring 10-17 mm. PARALECTOTYPES Seven specimens of the MNHNL correspond to the Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. original description, but only three of them received the 1907, Protonarthron dubium m[ihi] det. E. Hintz Type, red label of cotype by Ferrant. Moreover, eight other 2♂♂2♀♀. syntypes are preserved in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). The lectotype (IRSNB) is a complete female, 17 Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from six mm long, having the pink label of type. The remaining specimens of Luja’s collections measuring 10-16 mm. syntypes of the IRSNB, as the three ones labelled by Four syntypes are present in the MNHNL and other two Ferrant as well, might be paralectotypes, but their status in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993), even if Br e u n i n g (1940) 120 F. Vi t a l i claimed that two paratypes are preserved at MRACT. Cotype, Monochamus ruficornis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], While neither of the syntypes preserved in the 1♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Monochamus ruficornis IRSNB have the pink label of type, one syntype of Hi n t z [det. A. Kuntgen], 3♂♂3♀♀. those preserved in the MNHNL is labelled as such. It is a pinned male, 16 mm long, missing the five last joints Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on an undeter- of the left antenna and the last two joints of the right mined number of specimens from Kondué measuring one. This specimen is designated as lectotype, while the between 15 and 22 mm. Twelve types are present in the remaining ones as paralectotypes. MNHNL (including the specimens of coll. Kuntgen) and other six in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). Nonetheless, none of the examined specimens has the pink label of Protonarthron fasciatum Br e u n i n g , 1936 type; hence, the lectotype cannot be identified. = Protonarthron fasciatum Hi n t z in litteris Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) transferred this species to Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Monochamus Dejean, 1821, but Br e u n i n g (1936) Protonarthron fasciatum m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Cotype synonymised it with M. plumbeus (Ga h a n , 1888). Later, [in litt.], 1♂2♀♀. Di l l o n & Di l l o n (1961) restored the species under the new genus Ethiopiochamus, which subsequently was Re m a r k s : Though He u e r t z (1954) also quoted this considered as a subgenus of Monochamus. species as “Protonarthron fasciatum Hintz” (evidently on materials of the MNHNL), Hintz had never described it. In fact, Protonarthron fasciatum was described by Oxyhammus konduensis Hi n t z , 1913 PARALECTO- Br e u n i n g only in 1936, with the same name, but from TYPE one male of the IRSNB, coll. Le Moult (Co o l s , 1993). Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Oxyhammus konduensis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, Tomolamia konduensis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], 1♀; Tribe Lamiini La t r e i ll e , 1825 ditto, ?Prosopocera bimaculata Ha r . [det. V. Ferrant], Oxyhammus cinctus Jo r d . det S. Breuning [1950], 1♀. Monohammus congolensis Hi n t z , 1913 SYNTYPES Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on an undeter- 1907, Monohammus congolensis [mihi], det. E. Hintz, mined number of specimens from Kondué measuring Type, Monochamus congolensis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], between 11 and 15 mm. One is preserved in the 2♂♂3♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Monochamus MNHNL and other two in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). congolensis Hi n t z [det. A. Kuntgen], 1♂1♀. The specimen present in the MNHNL has no pink label of type; hence, it can be identified as paralectotype. The Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on an second specimen identified by Breuning belonged likely undetermined number of specimens from Kondué to the same series but it is improbable that it was studied measuring between 19 and 23 mm. Seven syntypes by Hintz, having a different label of species (7284 rather (including the specimens of coll. Kuntgen) are present than 3401). Hence it must be considered as topotype. in the MNHNL, while only one is present in the IRSNB I select as lectotype the female preserved in the (Co o l s , 1993). Though the first specimen has a red label IRSNB, 14.5 mm long, missing the right protibia and of type rather than of cotype put by Ferrant, none of the protarsus. It is the largest specimen and, being collected specimens preserved in both MNHNL and IRSNB has in 1904, the first collected one of this species. the pink label of type; hence, the lectotype cannot be Br e u n i n g (1936) synonymised this species with identified. Oxyhammus cinctus Jo r d a n , 1903 though Hi n t z knew Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) transferred this species to the such species, which he mentioned in the original genus Pseudhammus Kolbe, 1894. description.

Monohammus ruficornis Hi n t z , 1913 SYNTYPES Tribe Morimopsini La c o r d a i r e , 1869 Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Monohammus ruficornis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Dytiloderus lujae Hi n t z , 1911 SYNTYPES Type, Monochamus ruficornis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, 2♂♂3♀♀; ditto, Monoh[ammus], ruficornis Hi n t z , Dytiloderus Lujae m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂1♀. Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 121

Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from five type, Sternotomiella maculata Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], specimens of the collection Luja. Two of them are 3♂♂2♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Pinacosterna present in the MNHNL, while another one is preserved maculatus Hi n t z [det. A. Kuntgen], 3♂♂4♀♀. in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). Neither of the specimens preserved in both MNHNL and IRSNB has the pink Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on an undeter- label of type; hence, they cannot be considered as mined number of specimens from Kondué measuring lectotypes. One of the types of the MNHNL was also between 18 and 22 mm. Seven syntypes are present in exhibited to the public during an exposition dedicated the MNHNL (including the coll. Kuntgen) and other to Luja in 1946 (Me y e r , 2004). five are in the IRSNB C( o o l s , 1993). Br e u n i n g (1950b) transferred this species to One of these specimens has a pink label of type and Monoxenus sg. Bothynoscelis. must be designated as lectotype. It is a pinned female, 22 mm long, missing the last three segments of the right antenna. None of the specimens preserved in the Tribe Polyrhaphidini Th o m s o n , 1860 MNHNL has the pink label of type; hence, they can be identified as paralectotypes, as the remaining preserved Eudryoctenes corticarius Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE in the IRSNB. and PARALECTOTYPE Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) transferred this and the following = Endrioctenes (sic!) corticarius (Hi n t z ) Luja, 1918 species to the genus Sternotomiella Au r i v i l l i u s , 1911, misspelling but Br e u n i n g (1935) considered them as simple morphs Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, of Sternotomiella fulvosignata (Qu e d e n f e l d t , 1882). Eudryoctenes corticarius m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, Finally, Le p e s m e & Br e u n i n g (1956b) transferred such 2♂♂2♀♀; ditto, 5♂♂2♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, species and its forms to Bangalaia Du v i v i e r , 1890. The Eudryoctenes corticarius Hi n t z [det. A. Kuntgen], misidentification of Bangalaia chaerila Jo r d a n , 1903 2♂♂2♀♀. with B. compta Jo r d a n , 1903 (see below) also explains why Hintz described Pinacosternodes maculatus and Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from two P. uniformis as new species, without noticing that both pairs of the collection Luja, coming from Kondué were actually varieties of Bangalaia fulvosignata. and measuring 18-22 mm. Lu j a (1918) mentioned this species (with a misspelled name) regarding its extraordinary mimicry with the lichens covering trees. Pinacosternodes uniformis Hi n t z , 1913 PARALEC- Br e u n i n g (1958) synonymised this with Eudryoctenes TOTYPES africanus africanus (Jo r d a n , 1903). Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. Eleven specimens having a red label of type put by 1907, Pinacosternodes uniformis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Ferrant, two of them also with Hintz’s hand-written type, Sternotomiella uniformis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], determination label, are preserved in the MNHNL. The 2♂♂2♀♀; ditto, 3♂♂5♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, specimen having the pink label of type is recognised as Pinacosterna uniformis Hi n t z [det. A. Kuntgen], lectotype: it is a pinned male, 18 mm long, missing the 2♂♂3♀♀. last left antennomere. In addition, the IRSNB claims the presence of Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described it on an undetermined number four other syntypes in its collection (Co o l s , 1993). of specimens from Kondué measuring between 18 and Nonetheless, one male is only 15 mm long and one female 20 mm. comes from Kassai; consequently, they cannot be types. Only six among seventeen specimens (including The remaining two specimens (a pair), both without the coll. Kuntgen) correspond to the description, while pink label of type, are recognised as paralectotypes. another syntype is present in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). Such specimen also has the pink label of type; hence, it is designated as lectotype. It is a pinned female, 20 mm Tribe Prosopocerini Th o m s o n , 1868 long, In contrast, none of the specimens preserved in the MNHNL has the pink label of type, so they should Pinacosternodes. maculatus Hi n t z , 1913 PARALEC- be identified as paralectotypes, while the other ones TOTYPES coming from Kondué are simple topotypes. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Pinacosternodes maculatus m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, 122 F. Vi t a l i

Pinacosternodes viridis Hi n t z , 1913 Prosopocera ocellata var. bioculata m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, PARALECTOTYPES cotypes, 3♂♂3♀♀; ditto, coll. A. Kuntgen, Prosopocera Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, bioculata Hintz [det. A. Kuntgen], 1♂1♀. Pinacosternodes viridis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, cotype, Sternotomiella viridis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], 3♂♂. Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this form (which Br e u n i n g considered as a species in 1936) from an undetermined Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on an number of specimens coming from Kondué. undetermined number of specimens from Kondué Eight syntypes (including both specimens of coll. measuring between 13 and 18 mm. Three syntypes are Kuntgen) are present in the MNHNL and other six (ex present in the MNHNL and other two in the IRSNB coll. Hintz) in the IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). Nonetheless, (Co o l s , 1993). One of the latter specimens has a pink two of these last specimens are not coming from Kondué; label of type and it is designated as lectotype. It is a consequently, they cannot be considered as syntypes. labelled male, 14 mm long, missing the left hind claw. None of the observed specimens has the pink label of Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) transferred this species to type; hence, the lectotype cannot be identified. Sternotomiella, but Br e u n i n g (1935) considered it as a chromatic form of Bangalaia chaerila. Hintz was unaware of the true relationships with such species since Prosopocera ferranti Hi n t z , 1919 HOLOTYPE (Fig. he misidentified some typical chaerila of the MNHNL 14) as B. compta, actually a variety of B. fulvosignata having Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, analogue pattern. Prosopocera Ferranti m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, type, 1♂; ditto, 1♂2♀♀.

Timoreticus viridis Hi n t z , 1911 SYNTYPES Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species on only one male = Tomoseticus (sic!) viridis (Hi n t z ) Fe r r a n t , 1911 coming from Kondué, 31 mm long. misspelling Besides the specimens preserved in the MNHNL, Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. two other presumed syntypes are preserved in the 1907, Timoreticus viridis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, cotypes, IRSNB (Co o l s , 1993). One of them come from Kassai Alphitopola viridis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], 1♂1♀; ditto, and another from Lulua, while the first male preserved E. Luja don. 1917, Timoreticus viridis Hi n t z det. E. in the MNHNL comes from Kondué and reaches the Hintz, Alphitopola viridis Hi n t z [det. V. Ferrant], 1♂. right size. Hence, this last specimen is recognised as holotype, while both specimens present in the IRSNB Re m a r k s : Fe r r a n t (1911) mentioned this species (though and the remaining three present in the MNHNL, must as Tomoseticus viridis) among the ones that Hintz was be deemed as topotypes. describing for the MNHNL. Two other specimens from Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) ignored this species, which Kondué and Kassai are preserved in the IRSNB (Co o l s , Br e u n i n g (1936) synonymised with Prosopocera 1993), but only the former one can be considered as (s. str.) fryi Mu r r a y , 1871. a syntype, since Kassai was not mentioned as typical locality. All examined syntypes are without a pink label of type; moreover, both specimens of MNHNL have a Prosopocera (Alphitopola) gahani m. basitriangularis label “cotype” instead of “type”. Hence, the lectotype Br e u n i n g , 1950 HOLOTYPE (Fig. 15) might be that specimen preserved in MRACT (Br e u n i n g , Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, 1936). All other specimens are topotypes. Alphitopola (?) Peeli Gah. det. E. Hintz, Prosopocera Au r i v i l l i u s (1921) considered Timoreticus gahani m. basitriangularis mihi det. S. Breuning [1950], Péringuey, 1896 as a subgenus of Prosopocera De j e a n , Typ., 1♀. 1835. Later, Br e u n i n g (1936) synonymised Timoreticus with Dalterus Fa i r m a i r e , 1892 but transferred viridis to the subgenus Alphitopola Th o m s o n , 1857. Tribe Saperdini Mu l s a n t , 1839

Glenea congolensis Hi n t z , 1911 LECTOTYPE and Prosopocera ocellata var. bioculata Hi n t z , 1911 PARALECTOTYPE (Fig. 16) SYNTYPES Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1911, Glenea congolensis m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♂1♀. Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 123

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20

Figs 1- 20 – 1. Saphanodes lujae Hi n t z , 1913 HT. 2. Hastertia bougainvillei La m e e r e , 1912 LT. 3. Clinopleurus lansbergei La m e e r e , 1912 LT. 4. Oligoenoplus luzonicus Sc h w a r z e r , 1926 LT. 5. ditto, PLT. 6. Jonthodes nodicollis Hi n t z , 1919 LT. 7. Chlorophorus manillae var. aurivilliusi Sc h w a r z e r , 1926 LT. 8. Neoclosterus ferranti Bo p p e , 1912 HT. 9. Neoclosterus opacipennis Bo p p e , 1912 HT. 10. Centrotoclytus helleri Sc h w a r z e r , 1926 HT. 11. Isosaphanus ferranti Hi n t z , 1913 LT. 12. Metopotylus costatus Hi n t z , 1911 LT. 13. Aderpas congolensis Hi n t z , 1913 HT. 14. Prosopocera ferranti Hi n t z , 1919 HT. 15. Prosopocera (Alphitopola) gahani m. basitriangularis Br e u n i n g , 1950 HT. 16. Glenea congolensis Hi n t z , 1911 LT. 17. Glenea (s. str.) puella m. lujae Br e u n i n g , 1950 HT. 18. Latisternum lunulatum Hi n t z , 1919 HT. 19. Tragocephala nobilis m. latefasciata Br e u n i n g , 1950 HT. 20. Tragocephala semisuturalis m. flava Br e u n i n g , 1950 HT. 124 F. Vi t a l i

Re m a r k s : Br e u n i n g (1956-58) synonymised this HOLOTYPE (Fig. 19) species with Glenea (s. str.) johnstoni Ga h a n , 1902 Congo Belge, H. de Schwarzenberg-Luxembourg don. from Uganda. 1932, Tragocephala Mniszechi Th o m s . det. E. Hintz, Both types that Hi n t z mentioned as types are Tragocephala nobilis m. latefasciata mihi det. S. preserved in the MNHNL. I designate the male Breuning, 1950, Typ., 1♀. specimens as lectotype.

Tragocephala semisuturalis m. flava Br e u n i n g , 1950 Glenea (s. str.) puella m. lujae Br e u n i n g , 1950 HOLOTYPE (Fig. 20) HOLOTYPE (Fig. 17) Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, ?Tragocephala basalis Jord. det. E. Hintz, Tragocephala Glenea ossifera Jord. det. E. Hintz (3676a), Glenea (s. semisuturalis m. flava mihi det. S. Breuning 1950, Typ., str.) puella m. lujae mihi det. S. Breuning [1950], Typ., 1♀. 1♂.

Acknowledgements Tribe Sternotomini Th o m s o n , 1860 The present paper has been financially supported by the Musée National d’Histoire Naturelle of Luxembourg since September Sternotomis flavomaculata Hi n t z , 1919 PARATYPE 2008. Many thanks to Jean-Michel Guinet, curator of the zoological Congo belge, Stanleyfalls [= Boyoma Falls], R. P. collection of the MNHNL, for his friendly support and continuous H. Kohl [lgt.], R. P. H. Kohl don. 1913, Sternotomis collaboration; to Alain Drumont, Institut Royal de Sciences flavomaculata m[ihi] det. E. Hintz 1914, Type, 1♀. Naturelles, Brussels (Belgium), for his sincere support and helpful contribution during my stay at the IRSNB, to Johannes Frisch and Joachim Willers, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin (Germany) for Re m a r k s : Though the specimen of MNHNL has a their kind collaboration in finding the types preserved there. Many label dating 1914, the species was described only in thanks to Karl Adlbauer, Landesmuseum Joanneum, Graz (Austria), 1919, after WWI. The holotype, coming from Nlohe for having provided his original reprints, to Andrea and Antonio Rey, Genoa (Italy), and my father Alfredo Vitali, Genoa (Italy), for o o l s (Cameroon), is preserved in the IRSNB (C , 1993); his valuable help in finding important papers in the library of the however, Hi n t z mentioned several specimens coming Società entomologica italiana. from Stanleyfalls, which must be deemed as paratypes.

Bibliography Tribe Theocridini Th o m s o n , 1858 Ad l b a u e r , K., 2002. Die afrikanischen Arten der Gattung Latisternum lunulatum Hi n t z , 1919 HOLOTYPE (Fig. Pachydissus Newman, 1838 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: 18) Cerambycini). Coleoptera, 6 (1-2): 157-185. Congo belge, Kondué, E. Luja [lgt.], E. Luja don. 1907, Au r i v i l l i u s , C., 1912. Coleopterorum Catalogus 39. Latisternum lunulatum m[ihi] det. E. Hintz, Type, 1♀; Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae. S. Schenkling, Berlin, 574 ditto, 2♂♂. pp.

Au r i v i l l i u s , C., 1921. Coleopterorum Catalogus 73. Re m a r k s : Hi n t z described this species from only one Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Lamiinae I. S. Schenkling, specimen, 20 mm long, coming from Kondué. Only Berlin, 704 pp. the female preserved in the MNHNL reaches this size; hence, it must be deemed as the holotype. Au r i v i l l i u s ,C., 1928. Revision of the Philippine species of Clytini. The Philippine Journal of Sciences, 36 (3): 307-329. Br e u n i n g (1950c) transferred this species to the genus Paratheocris Br e u n i n g , 1938, basing on non- Bo p p e , P. L., 1912. Diagnoses préliminaires de Coléoptères typical specimens preserved in the IRSNB (Co o l s , nouveaux d’Afrique et de Madagascar [Col.]. Bulletin de la 1993). Société entomologique de France, 1912 (4): 94-96. Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1934. Études sur les Lamiaires (Col. Ceramb.) Première Tribu: Tragocephalini Thomson. Novitates Tribe Tragocephalini Th o m s o n , 1857 Entomologicae, 2-3 suppl., fasc. 2-13: 8-98. Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1936. Études sur les Lamiaires (Col. Tragocephala nobilis m. latefasciata Br e u n i n g , 1950 Ceramb.) Troisième Tribu: Prosopocerini Thomson. Novitates Type catalogue of the Cerambycoidea in the Natural History Museum of Luxembourg 125

Entomologicae, 3 suppl., fasc. 21-29: 157-230. Disteniinae, Lepturinae, Parandrinae, Prioninae et Spondylinae. Documents de travail de l’I.R.Sc.B.N., Brussels, Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1937. Études sur les Lamiaires (Col. 42: 1-39. Ceramb.) Quatrième Tribu: Ceroplesini Thomson. Novitates Entomologicae, 3 suppl., fasc. 30-34: 231-270. Di l l o n , L.S. & Di l l o n , E.S., 1961. The Monochamini (Cerambycidae) of the Ethiopian faunistic region. II. Subtribe Br e u n i n g , S. von, 1938. Études sur les Lamiaires (Col. Monochamidi. Genera related to Monochamus. Bulletin of Ceramb.) Septième Tribu: Ancylonotini Lac. Novitates the British Museum (Natural History), 11 (3): 61-96. Entomologicae, 3 suppl., fasc. 41-45: 319-364. Fe r r a n t , V., 1911. Ed. Luja. Bulletin de la Société des Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1942. Études sur les Lamiaires (Col. naturalistes luxembourgeois, 21: 249-257. Ceramb.) Dixième Tribu: Crossotini Thoms. Novitates Entomologicae, 3 suppl., fasc. 73-84: 8-101. Gu i n e t , J.M., 2002. Victor Ferrant (1856-1942). Ferrantia, 33: 1. Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1944. Études sur les Lamiaires (Col. Ceramb.) Douzième Tribu: Agniini Thomson. Novitates He u e r t z , M., 1954. Edouard Luja. Archives de l’Institut Entomologicae, 3 suppl., fasc. 109-135: 297-512. Grand-Ducal de Luxembourg. Section de Sciences naturelles, physiques et mathématiques, XXI: 23-34. Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1950a. Quelques formes nouvelles ou peu connues de Lamiaires (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) du Musée Hi n t z , E., 1910. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Cerambycidenfauna d´Histoire Naturelle de Luxembourg. Archives de l’Institut der deutschen Kolonien Afrikas (Col.) II. Deutsche Grand-Ducal de Luxembourg, 2 (19): 447-448. Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1910: 305-310.

Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1950b. Révision des Morimopsini. Hi n t z , E., 1911. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der deutschen Longicornia vol. I., P. Lechevalier, Paris, 161-262. zentral-Afrikaexpedition 1907-1908 unter Führung Adolf Friedrichs, Herzogs zu Mecklenburg. Band III. Zoologie, Teil Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1950c. Révision des Theocridini. I. Cerambycidae. H. Schubotz, Berlin 425-446 + 1 Tab. Longicornia vol. I., P. Lechevalier, Paris: 279-303. Hi n t z , E., 1912. Die Cerambycidengruppe der Crossotidae Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1954. Nouvelles formes de Lamiaires (Col.). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1912: 190-202. (Septième partie). Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 30 (41): 1-24. Hi n t z , E., 1913. Neue afrikanische Cerambyciden (Col.). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1913: 195-205. Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1956-58. Revision der Gattung Glenea Newm - Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum G. Frey, Hi n t z , E., 1916. Coleopteren aus Zentralafrika. VI. 7: 1-99; 671-893; 9: 229-351; 804-907. Cerambycidae. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien, 30: 230-238. Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1958. Révision des Acanthocini de l’Afrique Noire (Première partie). Bulletin de l’I.F.A.N., 20, Hi n t z , E., 1919. Ergebnisse der zweiten deutschen A, 3: 979-1065. zentral-Afrikaexpedition 1910-1911 unter Führung Adolf Friedrichs, Herzogs zu Mecklenburg. Band I. Zoologie Teil Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , & Té o c c h i , P., 1977. Création de la tribu I. Cerambyciden. Hamburgische Wissenschaftliche Stiftung, des Aderpasini n. Révision et bionomie des espèces, des 13: 599-638. genres Aderpas Thoms. et Ancylonopsis Br. (Coleoptera Cerambycidae Lamiinae). Bulletin de l’I.F.A.N., 39, A, 1 : Hü d e p o h l , K.E., 1992. The Longhorn of the Philippines. 142-168. Part III (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae: Callichromatini, Clytini, Glaucytini). Entomofauna, 13 (21): 297-340. Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , & Té o c c h i , P., 1979. Révision des Acmocerini Thomson et données bionomiques les concernant. La m e e r e , A.A.L., 1912. Révision des Prionides. Vingt- Bulletin de l’I.F.A.N., 41, A, 2 : 366-407. deuxième Mémoire. Addenda et Corrigenda. Mémoires de la Société entomologique du Belgique, 21: 113-188. Bu r g e o n , L., 1931. Liste des Callichromini du Congo Belge des Collections du Musée du Congo. Revue de Zoologie et de Le p e s m e , P. & Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1956a. Révision des genres Botanique Africaines, 22 (2): 108-131. du group Metallyra Thoms. (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines, 53 (1-2): 208- Co o l s , J., 1993. Liste du matériel typique conservé dans les 225. collections entomologiques de l’Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique. Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea, Le p e s m e , P. & Br e u n i n g , S. v o n , 1956b. Sternotomini de Cerambycidae VIII. Sous-famille des Lamiinae. Documents l’Ouest Africain. Longicornia vol. III, P. Lechevalier, Paris: de travail de l’I.R.Sc.B.N., Brussels, 74: 1-115. 269-347.

Da m o i s e a u R. & Co o l s , J., 1987. Liste du matériel typique Lu j a , E., 1918. La Faune Congolaise au Musée d’histoire conservé dans les collections entomologiques de l’Institut naturelle du Luxembourg. Bulletin de la Société des royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique. Coleoptera naturalistes luxembourgeois, 28: 100-111. Cerambycoidea Cerambycidae: Aseminae, Cerambycinae, 126 F. Vi t a l i

Lu j a , E., 1951. Récit d’un voyage au Mozambique (1900- Sc h m i d t , M., 1922. Die afrikanischen Callichrominen 1902). Bulletin de la Société des naturalistes luxembourgeois, (Col. Ceramb.) nach systematischen, phylogenetischen und 55: 193-210. geographischen Gesichtspunkten. Archiv für Naturgeschichte A, 88 (6): 61-232. Lu j a , E., 1953. Voyages et séjour au Brésil, État de Minas Geraes (1921-1924). Bulletin de la Société des naturalistes Sc h w a r z e r , B., 1925. Sauters Formosa-Ausbeute. luxembourgeois, 57: 34-63. Entomologische Blätter, 21: 145-154.

Me y e r , M., 2004. L’évolution récente des collections Sc h w a r z e r , B., 1926. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Cerambyciden d’invertébrés. Vertébrés. In: AAVV, 2004. 150 Joer. Musée (Col.). Entomologische Mitteilungen, 15 (1): 6-14. national d’histoire naturelle. F. Faber, Mersch: 154-167. Té o c c h i , P., 1998. Diagnoses, synonymies et chorologie Ma r a z z i , G. & Ma r a z z i , V., 2006. Description of a new de quelques Lamiaires africains (suite) (Coleoptera species of genus Xixuthrus (Coleoptera Cerambycidae Cerambycidae). Lambillionea, 98 (2): 203-210. Prioninae). In: Ma r a z z i , G., Ma r a z z i , V. & Ko m i y a , Z., Té o c c h i , P., 2001. Synonymes, diagnoses et bionomie de 2006. New Xixuthrina from Indo-Australian Region. Natura quelques Cérambycidés africains (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) Edizioni Scientifiche, Ravenna, 47 pp. (suite 2). Lambillionea, 101 (2): 265-274. Ma r t i n s , U.R., 1977. Transference of the genera Oemida Té o c c h i , P., Ji r o u x , E. & Su d r e , J., 2004. Synonymies, Gahan, Comusia Thomson and Hypomares Thomson from diagnoses et bionomie de quelques Cerambycidae. Partie 2 Methiini to Obriini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Papéis (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Les Cahiers Magellanes, 39: Avulsos de Zoologia, 31 (6): 103-118. 1-32. Ma r t i n s , U.R., 1980. Notes, descriptions and checklist of African Xystrocera (Col. Cerambycidae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 33 (5): 99-125. Francesco Vi t a l i Qu e n t i n , R.M. & Vi l l i e r s , A., 1969. Révision des Musée national d’histoire naturelle de Luxembourg Plectogasterini nov. trib. [Col. Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae]. rue Münster 25 Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N. S.) 5 (3): L-2160 Luxembourg 613-646.