Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report Condensed Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report Condensed Summary Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report Condensed Summary September 2019 B-Boy and B-Girl Hip Hop Jam Sessions Raumati at Te Oro. Image courtesy of Te Oro Te Oro In close proximity to central Auckland, the Ōmaru Reserves network links the Glen Innes town centre to the Tāmaki Estuary at Point England. Adapted from diagram: Tamaki Reference Plan. Cover image: B-Boy and B-Girl Hip Hop Jam Sessions Raumati at Te Oro. Image courtesy of Te Oro. The Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report was developed through the contributions and support of many. The report was informed by input from the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board, Tāmaki Regeneration Company, mana whenua, creative practitioners and organisations in the area, and the wider family of Auckland Council organisations. Ngā mihi nui ki a koutou katoa. This document is a condensed summary of the Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report. 2 Table of Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................. 4 1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Planning context ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Distinct physical character ............................................................................................. 7 1.3 Ōmaru Reserves ............................................................................................................ 8 1.4 Living heritages .............................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Mana whenua .............................................................................................................. 12 1.6 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 13 2 A guide for future investment .......................................................................................... 14 2.1 Te Ao Māori ................................................................................................................. 14 2.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Principles ..................................................................................................................... 15 2.4 Geospatial framework .................................................................................................. 15 2.5 Opportunity Assesment ................................................................................................ 16 3 Recommendations for investment .................................................................................. 17 Foreword As part of Te Kaunihera o Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland Council’s ongoing work to transform and enrich Auckland’s public spaces, opportunities for investment in public art are being explored in areas of population growth and urban intensification. Recognising that the township of Glen Innes and associated Ōmaru Reserves area1 are undergoing significant redevelopment and transformation over the next ten years, a scoping report has been undertaken to better understand how public art could manifest in this area and positively contribute to Auckland’s public space. Extensive engagement, strategies, plans and work programmes are already underway for the wider Tāmaki area and are outlined in the Tāmaki Precinct Master Plan. This work is being led by the Tāmaki Regeneration Company (TRC) in partnership with mana whenua. Having met with developers, planners and local creative practitioners, Auckland Council has undertaken preliminary scoping and assessment of opportunities for major public art capital investment in the Ōmaru Reserves catchment area over the next ten years. This research and analysis attempt to answer the framing question: What approach to investment in public art will create transformative value for the Ōmaru Reserves catchment area? This work was compiled into a detailed working document for internal use at Auckland Council, referred to as the Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report. The following document is a condensed summary of the Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report. 1 Ōmaru Reserves is a descriptive term used to refer to Apirana, Eastview, Taniwha, Maybury and Point England Reserves – the focus area for this report. 4 Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report 1 Context 1.1 Planning context: Public art in an evolving Tāmaki Makaurau Rapid population growth, urban intensification and regeneration throughout Tāmaki Makaurau provide the dramatic backdrop to this opportunity – bringing with it significant capital investment in infrastructure and urban development; a strategic drive to see public art transform and enrich Auckland’s public spaces; and a desire to align significant works. Auckland Council recognises that it is one of many players working in the spectrum of public art, but only one of a few commissioning large-scale artworks. To ensure better value and impact, Auckland Council is increasingly investing in large-scale, permanent, transformational public art projects, and decreasing its investment in smaller projects with less impact. The vision is to deliver inspiring, high quality and culturally vibrant signature public artworks across Auckland. The following selection from key planning documents act as useful guidelines for determining investment in public art in Tāmaki Makaurau: Auckland Plan • Belonging and participation: All Aucklanders will be part of and contribute to society, access opportunities, and have the chance to develop to their full potential. • Māori identity and wellbeing: A thriving Māori identity is Auckland’s point of difference in the world that advances prosperity for Māori and benefits all Aucklanders. • Environment and cultural heritage: Aucklanders preserve, protect and care for the natural environment as our shared cultural heritage, for its intrinsic value and for the benefit of present and future generations. Public Art Policy (2013): • Inspiring: Everyone has the opportunity to experience thought-provoking, culturally vibrant, enjoyable and challenging public art and public space • Unique and distinctive: Public art that responds to our place • For all Aucklanders and visitors: Public art that delights, welcomes, challenges and inspires • Known for its artistic quality, variety, depth and innovation: Public art that celebrates richness and creativity and models international best practice • Making a difference: Public art that transforms Auckland’s public places Planning context - Glen Innes Glen Innes has been identified by Auckland Council as a priority area for development and regeneration. With numerous multi-layered plans and work programmes directly affecting the community, local residents are experiencing a significant level of ‘engagement’ fatigue and stress as a result of the disruption and change caused by an intense regeneration work programme. Council aims to build on the kōrero and engagement work already underway. To avoid further consultation fatigue, the following selection from local planning documents have been identified as strategic guidelines for investment in public art in the Ōmaru Reserves: • Tāmaki Precinct Master Plan: o Celebration of Tāmaki’s unique identify and culture – Mahi Toi and Tohu o Active Well Used Spaces – aims to create well used and much loved spaces that are safe and useable by all and includes fostering creativity • Glen Innes Town Centre Revitalisation Plan: o a thriving town centre that meets the needs of the current and future populations while maintaining the Tāmaki culture. o a ‘green gateway’ leading to the Tāmaki Strait from the town centre via a green corridor o improving connectivity o enhancing public space • Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Plan: o people are at the heart of this plan o listen and work with the community o promote the arts and celebrate our diverse cultures o an active and engaged community o a community that cares about its environment o the place to be Other planned works of note in the local area- • Tāmaki Path project: a shared path (5km) alongside the Tāmaki Estuary from Wai o Taiki Bay to Panmure • Glen Innes to Tāmaki Drive Shared Path project: a shared path for cyclists and pedestrians from Merton Road near Glen Innes Station to Tāmaki 6 Ōmaru Reserves Public Art Scoping Report • Glen Innes Rail Station improvement project: planned pedestrian overbridge connecting Glen Innes Train Station to the town centre at Mayfair Place • Glen Innes and Panmure Community Facilities Needs Assessment: Community service needs assessment and associated implications and options for community facilities in Glen Innes and Panmure, due for completion in late 2019 Summary comment – planning context Auckland Council recognises that public art has an important role to play within the urban redevelopment context and is a key contributor to human experience, connection, cultural visibility, identity, a sense of belonging and aspirations for the future. Within the local planning context of Glen Innes, Council notes the potential for public art to contribute to meeting the outcomes and vision of the Auckland Plan, the Public Art Policy and urban development plans for Tāmaki by investing in contemporary public art projects of scale that transform public spaces. 1.2 Distinct physical character
Recommended publications
  • Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Ward By-Election 17 FEBRUARY 2018
    CANDIDATE INFORMATION SHEET Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Ward By-Election 17 FEBRUARY 2018 BACKGROUND CANDIDATE PROFILE STATEMENT As a result of the recent resignation of a Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Ward Every candidate may provide the electoral officer with a candidate councillor, an extraordinary vacancy has occurred, and a by-election is profile statement with their nomination. This statement must not now required to fill the vacancy. exceed 150 words and can contain information about the candidate, The by-election will be held on Saturday 17 February 2018. It will their qualifications and skills applicable to the position for which be conducted by postal vote, using the First Past the Post electoral they are standing, and their policies/intentions if elected to office. system, under the provisions of the Local Electoral Act 2001 and the A candidate profile statement cannot be used to comment on the Local Electoral Regulations 2001. policies, performance etc of any other candidate. KEY DATES Candidate profile statements will be printed in plain text, without formatting, and sent to each elector with their voting document. Relevant key dates for your diary are: The candidate profile statement may be in English (150 words) or Nominations open Friday 24 November 2017 Māori (150 words) or both (maximum of 150 words in each language), or in any other language (not exceeding 150 words in total). Where Nominations close 12 noon, Friday 22 December 2017 more than one language is used, the information contained must be Delivery of voting packs from Friday 26 January 2018 substantially consistent within each language. Appointment of scrutineers by 12 noon, Friday 16 February 2018 Should all or part of a candidate profile statement be provided in Close of voting 12 noon, Saturday 17 February 2018 a language other than English or Māori, it is required that this be provided in an electronic graphic file.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Restoration Times Over Next 24 Hours
    Northcote Point Bayswater L a Vauxhall k e ´ R o y a a d w Stanley Point r Stanley Bay Cheltenham o t o M Devonport n r e h t Browns Island (Motukorea) r o N et tre S r W e e s m t a h H av en Dr ive t e t e B e r t e e a r S t c Freemans Bay t S r h Mechanics Bay e CBD u e n R n b o l t o B e K s v A e a a b e t u d A r h o p H t n Mission Bay S e H e i Ponsonby o S P t c T k r S w e a a t o n m ve r i t Kohimarama e e a r A n e r ki D r Saint Heliers t e e e e s S Orakei T e u o u 6 t n t n r 1 e e e Q Parnell l T b il a v e h u y v ta A R t S n r et e o a i re r a l N S Towai S t a d ay G t oad rw d g R d oto a re tt il Glendowie M a e A tern io S t n Cres ro K r es o treet dde c p ik -w o en K i rth R G t S d o d ad o a S N Grafton llA Ro h t Arch Hill y a Kepa i o re e r o m R e rn S R a y t Newton a tre i r a B e Sho e a P t re k m B o t a s R r a r n e oa ie d d e d O R l a Newmarket r t e o Eden Terrace t e o R S d e H e S u a t c t a e n r r n d S ra a o t e e e u p e R S v d s p E t l r l A a a Meadowbank e e o A e De H c ll Avenue R p B W o n i e d r e h a n a a a n p r o i e a t Jo a S Wai o Taiki Bay M R t hns d c a S R e d a i o A u r u a h u v L n u o V Remuera a e a t e p R R l n l e e d R Glen Innes y v e a e Saint Johns u a m n o e r R g i A v t i o e P a ro o u v r s e N l pe a s S R d D ct r e T d e t a i a erra e i c K l o R u p l oa a M i g S d n il r n ton Mount Eden a G Ro a o a ad R u P M t t e h s e v Point England D a iv i D is Halifa e r r ex ra x Avenue r E D y ter el n e D i a Ave St an e n r n d e ue et
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Heart’S Behind Big Run
    www.eastandbayscourier.co.nz Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Heart’s behind big run By SARAH MOYES I have a few mates who STU Joyce was just 11 when will donate once I cross the heart disease killed his big finish‘ line. They’ll believe it brother. when they see it. Now the 26-year-old from Parnell is running his first Stu Joyce marathon to help others ’ affected by the condition. He’s a Heart Racer in the finish line. They’ll believe it adidas Auckland Marathon when they see it.’’ and is raising money for the Mr Joyce has been training Heart Foundation. for four months and is feeling ‘‘It makes the event worth- pretty confident that his four while,’’ he says. to five runs a week will give Mr Joyce’s brother Nick him the endurance he needs contracted a rare virus that on Sunday. attacked his heart when he But getting to this point was four. hasn’t been easy. ‘‘Viruses usually only hit He didn’t want to think once. This one came back about the 42km slog when he twice more,’’ Mr Joyce says. first signed up. Nick lost the battle when To make training a bit the virus hit a third time. He more bearable he treated was just 14 years old when he himself to an expensive pair died. of running shoes. Then the ‘‘Doctors still don’t really unthinkable happened. know what it was.’’ ‘‘I left them outside my Mr Joyce isn’t a first-time front door and someone runner. He completed the nicked them.’’ Auckland half-marathon in His feet are battered and 2008 and last year did the blistered from pounding the 10km race.
    [Show full text]
  • Howick-Ward-Map.Pdf
    Howick Ward Musick Point Extent of Achilles Point Main View D West Tamaki Point Ladies Bay A O R R Karaka Bay ID F D F E LI WA IMARI ESTREET LL C E R Saint Heliers BayIV V L R A O I D E K A N ROAD BA Y ROAD AD M O RO A G TREE A T LY ES T D Gower TPoint O R Pipimea Point E P O E REGIONAL OVERVIEW E V E M TR E U OR S D U N R TA E O M N E W Mission Bay A N Schnapper Point ELT K E V H I E V A E A M DRIVE A A V R N U O AD N E A N N E E E U E H D R V U IN E Pohutukawa Bay V G L E Saint Heliers A E N R AD A W D T HITEHAVEN RO E MELANE O E S L S V I A I U N N A E A N I ROAD L D K E O K V K A N ST Sunkist Bay T E W N G R IE A K D T C P V O A E D F U T S L S O E R C U R R O R T G I E Bucklands Beach T I NDO G l e n d o w i e F V V R I E E R AI S E R T TOW W Motukaraka Island D H E E U O I U T A E D R R R I S A M E R R N P O L S E W T O E A Y A F V A A S R H D A D T I O R A A E A R E A A C R L D A WER AT A D T G E R R K o h i m a r a m a R D R R M AS E R E A I A A H O B S O M B A R O Eastern Beach A ROAD PIA D P Y E R Eastern Beach E R N C E K A N UR Y A O R V A T R A O R O E B D A E E UE L N C D N P E Sandy Point I U AV D U E S E T E N E U G O IV Q CRES RA R W T E C A D H N N E Y Y E I N A T C D R E ES T HE E P M AD CR L D S A Mellons Bay A A GOW T E C R IN S T GD O SL E S L I R A E PO IVE R O E Wai o Taiki Bay C A R Half Moon Bay A E E N T Wai o Taiki Bay N M N ES A N S N F I RI E ARA- E C L L TA ROA R TO I D P E E N M E A S E R U A U E C T V D A H I V E N N NT E I A D E W R E Mellons Bay G l e n I n n e s E R D O V A V V D R BE A ACH Y Y D R
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Network Plan for Part of Panmure, Glen Innes and Saint Johns 2019-2034
    Open Space Network Plan for Part of Panmure, Glen Innes and Saint Johns 2019-2034 20 December 2019 PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Contents 1.0 PARKS AND OPEN SPACES 4.7 Te Tauoma (Purchas Hill) ........................................49 4.36 Merton Reserve .......................................................78 4.37 Morrin Reserve ........................................................79 1.1 Executive Summary ..................................................3 4.8 Riverside Reserve ...................................................50 4.38 Leybourne Circle Reserve .......................................80 1.2 Introduction ...............................................................4 4.9 Dunkirk Reserve ......................................................51 4.39 Paddington Reserve ................................................81 1.3 Implementation ..........................................................4 4.10 Mt Wellington War Memorial Reserve .....................52 4.40 Mauinaina Reserve .................................................82 1.4 Context ......................................................................5 4.11 Panmure Wharf Reserve .........................................53 4.41 Allenby Reserve ......................................................83 1.5 Strategic Context .......................................................7 4.12 New Park .................................................................54 4.13 Point England Reserve ...........................................55 4.42 Mauinaina West Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Meeting Held On
    Community Partnership Expressions of Interest: Life International Charitable Trust ...................................................................................................................... 3 Life International Charitable Trust ...................................................................................................................... 5 TGTB .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Auckland Regional Migrant Services Charitable Trust ...................................................................................... 8 Life International Charitable Trust ...................................................................................................................... 9 Tamaki Outrigger Canoe Club ......................................................................................................................... 11 Maungarei Community Christian Trust ............................................................................................................ 12 St Georges Rowing Club .................................................................................................................................. 17 Wai-o-Taiki Bay Residents Association ........................................................................................................... 19 Onehunga Peoples Garden ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board Meeting Held on 27/08/2019
    Local Development Initiative – Urban Ngahere Programme Year 1 Knowing Phase Urban Ngahere Analysis report for the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Overview The Maungakiekie-Tāmaki local board have provided Opex funding in the Financial year 18-19 to Councils Urban Forest Advisor to undertake a detailed analysis of the Ngahere (Forest) in their local area. This report outlines the distribution, ownership, and protection status of urban tree cover within the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board (Auckland Council) area. The intent of the report is to provide an evidence-based approach to ensure decision-makers are well-informed on the scale, health and diversity of the urban trees in their local board area. This information will enable the development of a sound and structured approach to urban forest management for future decision makers. Principally, the report will be utilised by Council’s Urban Forest Advisor for the Parks, Sports & Recreation Team, who is leading the Ngahere programme for the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board, to provide background information and some direction and context for an urban forest strategy. Auckland’s urban forest is remarkable and special, and likely to be the largest and most varied collection of amenity trees on public and private land in the country. However, rapid population growth and recent legislative change to the Resource Management Act is leading to significant changes in the urban landscape, which is reflected in the scale, maturity, and size of the urban forest. One of the most critical issues relating to urban forest in Auckland, and the most important unknown, is the rate of change in the urban forest canopy extent, including the numbers and sizes of trees being removed per annum.
    [Show full text]
  • You Have Our Full Support with This Initiative
    alternative application under Schedule 3 of the Local Government Act 2002 Alternative application by Mahurangi Action Incorporated Representative of applicant Cimino Cole, secretary 590 Mahurangi West Road RD 3 Warkworth Auckland 0983 [email protected] +64 27 462 4872 Proposed changes to Auckland Council governance arrangements: Mahurangi Action Incorporated (Mahurangi Action) hereby applies to the Local Government Commission for the single local board within the Rodney Ward of Auckland Council to be replaced by two local boards: 1 a northern local board that conforms with the present Warkworth and Wellsford subdivisions; and 2 a southern local board that conforms with the present Dairy Flat and Kumeu subdivisions, of the current Rodney Local Board. (An annotated map of the proposed local-board areas is appended to this alternative application) Mahurangi Action further applies for the number of Warkworth subdivision local-board members to be increased from three to four, in order that: 1 the northern local board in total has an odd number of board members; and 2 in anticipation of population growth in Warkworth, in what Auckland Council has deemed to be one of two satellite growth centres in the rural Auckland region. Mahurangi Action further applies for consideration of the name Tamahunga to be used for the proposed north-Rodney local board. Finally, Mahurangi Action applies for a moderate amount more power to be shared with the local boards by the governing body of Auckland Council. What the proposed changes are seeking to achieve
    [Show full text]
  • General SA2 Level 2018 Census Results (Charles Crothers, AUT)
    General SA2 Level 2018 Census results (Charles Crothers, AUT) Pop 2013_2018 15_29_years_201 30_64_years_201 65_years_and_ov occupied pvt dwel unoccupied pvt SA2namet TA name Pop_Total_2018 percentChange 8 % 8 % er_2018 % 2018 dwel 2018 North Cape Far North District 1602.00 16.80 14.23 44.94 21.16 633 219 Rangaunu Far North District 2310.00 13.90 16.88 42.47 15.84 777 174 Harbour Inlets Far North Far North District 45.00 -28.60 6.67 60.00 33.33 75 3 District Karikari Peninsula Far North District 1251.00 7.50 9.83 46.28 25.90 483 657 Tangonge Far North District 1134.00 .30 15.34 45.77 16.40 393 66 Ahipara Far North District 1230.00 19.20 16.59 45.85 15.85 396 153 Kaitaia East Far North District 2388.00 20.40 20.85 38.57 13.44 768 87 Kaitaia West Far North District 3483.00 19.90 19.55 36.61 16.88 1119 105 Rangitihi Far North District 936.00 14.30 17.95 44.55 16.67 333 33 Oruru-Parapara Far North District 846.00 23.10 14.89 49.65 15.96 288 90 Taumarumaru Far North District 2193.00 21.00 11.08 40.90 31.60 882 516 Herekino-Takahue Far North District 963.00 3.90 14.64 44.86 17.13 330 105 Peria Far North District 1107.00 16.40 14.36 48.78 15.99 426 90 Taemaro-Oruaiti Far North District 867.00 30.20 13.49 49.13 19.38 282 243 Whakapaku Far North District 744.00 5.10 10.89 45.97 22.18 276 234 Hokianga North Far North District 795.00 6.90 15.09 39.25 20.00 297 114 Kohukohu- Far North District 726.00 16.30 11.57 46.28 23.14 285 81 Broadwood Whakarara Far North District 1344.00 31.00 15.40 43.75 20.31 480 231 Kaeo Far North District 1191.00 18.50 16.12
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Bays and Glendowie Watercourse Assessment Report Morphum Environmental Ltd, April 2020 Eastern Bays and Glendowie Watercourse Assessment Report
    Eastern Bays and Glendowie Watercourse Assessment Report Morphum Environmental Ltd, April 2020 Eastern Bays and Glendowie Watercourse Assessment Report April 2020 Watercourse Assessment Report C. Davis K. Parmar K. Wilson D. Brockerhoff K. Fredrick D. Young Morphum Environmental Ltd. Auckland Council Healthy Waters Department Watercourse Assessment Report ISBN 978-1-99-002226-5 (Print) ISBN 978-1-99-002227-2 (PDF) Healthy Waters technical review completed on 9 March 2020 Reviewed by two reviewers Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Scott Speed Position: Waterways Planning Team Leader Healthy Waters Department Name: Colleen Brent Position: Senior Healthy Waters Specialist Date: 14 April 2020 Recommended citation Davis, C., K. Parmar, K. Wilson, D. Brockerhoff, K. Fredrick, and D. Young (2020). Eastern Bays and Glendowie Watercourse Assessment Report. Prepared by Morphum Environmental Ltd for Auckland Council. © 2020 Auckland Council Auckland Council disclaims any liability whatsoever in connection with any action taken in reliance of this document for any error, deficiency, flaw or omission contained in it. This document is licensed for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In summary, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the material, as long as you attribute it to the Auckland Council and abide by the other licence terms. Eastern Bays and Glendowie Watercourse Assessment Report Prepared for Auckland Council Final Executive Summary Morphum Environmental Ltd was engaged by Auckland Council to undertake a detailed assessment of the watercourses in the Glendowie and Eastern Bays stormwater catchments, collectively referred to as the ‘survey area’ in this report. Overall, a total of 15.4 km of watercourse was surveyed with 8.07 km in Eastern Bays and 7.33 km of stream in Glendowie including 594 stormwater pipes, culverts and inlet/outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebirds of the Tāmaki Estuary
    REVERSING THE DECLINE OF THE Shorebirds of the Tāmaki Estuary Prepared for the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki & Ōrākei Local Boards by Shaun Lee March 2019 Shorebirds of the Tāmaki Estuary. 1 The author: Shaun Lee is This report would not have a citizen scientist, he has been possible without the help of a lot of bird counters. completed multi-day birding Thank you all for the early workshops at the Pūkorokoro mornings and late nights. Miranda Shorebird Centre, minds dotterel, participates in Birds New Barbara Shaw Zealand wader censuses and Beth Evans other shorebird related events. David Doleman Dorthe Siggaard Elizabeth Pascal This report is not: A scientific analysis of the collected data. Gillian Eller Heather Rogers Helen Momota This report is: A overview of the current situation and with clear Jett Lee direction on next steps. Jim Sinclair Julie Chambers A review by a qualified shorebird Kathryn Legrove expert is recommended before Lora Young any management action is taken. Mark Eller Mike Peterson Noel Knight Pieter Richards Rowena West COVER PHOTO: Three Royal spoonbill roosting in the early morning mist at Tahuna Torea. BACK COVER PHOTO: Northern New Zealand Dotterel roosting at a construction site on Highbrook Drive. All2. photosShorebirds by Shaun of the LeeTāmaki unless Estuary otherwise stated. CONTENTS Introduction Pg .04 Which shorebirds use the Estuary? Pg .06 How do shorebirds use the Estuary? Pg .10 How did shorebirds use the Estuary? Pg .35 Advice from New Zealand’s shorebird experts Pg .57 Recommendations Pg .59 Appendix Pg .62 Shorebirds of the Tāmaki Estuary. 3 Introduction “The dominant wildlife in the area This report has been voluntarily has been omitted from the Open written for the Maungakiekie- Space Network Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Application of Māori Design Principles to Urban Neighbourhood Development Projects to Develop a Kaupapa Māori Design Framework and Assessment Tools
    Evaluating the Application of Māori Design Principles to Urban Neighbourhood Development Projects to Develop a Kaupapa Māori Design Framework and Assessment Tools Jade Kake & Jacqueline Paul Evaluating the Application of Māori Design Principles to Urban Neighbourhood Development Projects to Develop a Kaupapa Māori Design Framework and Assessment Tools Jade Kake Te Matapihi Jacqueline Paul Te Ara Poutama Department Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand Abstract Aims/purpose: This paper discusses and evaluates the application of Te Aranga and other kaupapa Māori design principles (principles derived from a Māori worldview and incorporating Māori knowledge and values) to urban neighbourhood development projects. By critically interrogating the application of established design principles, this project seeks to the evaluate their spatial application and to assess actual vs anticipated social outcomes. This study aims to support developers, designers, and planners working alongside mana whenua (local iwi or hapū who maintain customary authority over an identified area) and mataawaka communities (Māori living within in a given region who do not belong to a mana whenua group) to develop better spatial design processes, and to deliver better social outcomes at a neighbourhood scale. Methodology/approach: The research involves the development of a formal method of evaluation to assess the spatial and social outcomes realized through the application of Māori design principles to urban neighbourhood development/regeneration projects. Through the testing phase, a mixture of quantitative (through onsite observation and analysis of desktop material, such as master plans and architectural drawings) and qualitative (through the post-occupancy evaluation walk-through interviews with residents and key informants) data will be collected and analysed using the prototype assessment tool.
    [Show full text]