Minneapolis Minnesota

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minneapolis Minnesota A ULI ROSE CENTER ADVISORY SERVICES PROGRAM REPORT Minneapolis Minnesota Daniel Rose Center for Public Leadership in Land Use www.uli.org Minneapolis Minnesota Implementing a Vision for Transit-Oriented Development February 22–25, 2010 A Rose Center Advisory Services Program Report Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20007-5201 About the Urban Land Institute he mission of the Urban Land Institute is to Sharing knowledge through education, applied provide leadership in the responsible use of research, publishing, and electronic media; and land and in creating and sustaining thriv- Sustaining a diverse global network of local prac- ing communities worldwide. ULI is com- T tice and advisory efforts that address current and mitted to future challenges. Bringing together leaders from across the fields of Established in 1936, the Institute today has nearly real estate and land use policy to exchange best 30,000 members worldwide, representing the practices and serve community needs; entire spectrum of the land use and develop ment Fostering collaboration within and beyond ULI’s disciplines. Professionals represented include membership through mentoring, dialogue, and developers, builders, property own ers, investors, problem solving; architects, public officials, plan­­ners, real estate brokers, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, finan- Exploring issues of urbanization, conservation, ciers, academics, students, and librarians. regeneration, land use, capital formation, and sustainable development; ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is through member involvement and information Advancing land use policies and design practices resources that ULI has been able to set standards of ex- that respect the uniqueness of both built and natu- cellence in ­­de velopment prac­­tice. The Institute has long ral environments; been recognized as one of the world’s most respected and widely quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, growth, and development. ©2010 by the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Suite 500 West Washington, DC 20007-5201 All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents without written permission of the copyright holder is prohibited. 2 A Rose Center Advisory Services Program Report About the ULI Rose Center he mission of the ULI Daniel Rose Center East Coast as developer and manager of more than for Public Leadership in Land Use is to en- 30 million square feet of major office towers, com- courage and support excellence in land use mercial retail centers, mixed-use complexes, and decision making. By providing public of- high-rise residential buildings. Rose has pursued a T career involving a broad range of professional, civic, ficials with access to information, best practices, peer networks, and other resources, the Rose Cen- and nonprofit activities. ter seeks to foster creative, efficient, practical, and The Rose Center’s Advisory Board is chaired by Joe sustainable land use policies. Rose of the New York–based Georgetown Company. The Rose Center appointed the mayors of Phoenix, Members include Seth Brown of Brooklyn-based Minneapolis, Nashville, and Philadelphia as fellows Aspen Equities LLC; Alex Garvin of New York–based to serve in the center through 2010. Each of the four Alex Garvin and Associates; Stephen Goldsmith, mayors is leading a team of three additional fellows former mayor of Indianapolis and professor at from their respective cities, working with leading Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Govern- experts in the real estate development, finance, and ment; Glenda E. Hood, former mayor of Orlando and land use fields to tackle complex land use issues former Florida secretary of state; William H. Hudnut facing their communities. The Rose Center also III, former Indianapolis mayor and ULI/Joseph C. holds forums on topical land use issues for public Canizaro Chair for Public Policy emeritus; Greg leaders. In 2010 these included how cities can Johnson of Seattle-based Wright Runstad & Com- achieve their sustainability goals in the challeng- pany; Tom Murphy, former Pittsburgh mayor and ing fiscal climate, and how they can maximize senior resident fellow, ULI/Klingbeil Family Chair opportunities from the federal Neighborhood for Urban Development; Peter Rummell of the Jack- Stabilization Program. sonville, Florida–based Rummell Company; Julia Stasch of the MacArthur Foundation in Chicago; and Daniel Rose, chairman of Rose Associates Inc. in New Anthony A. Williams, former mayor of Washington, York City, committed $5 million in 2008 to create D.C., of Arlington, Virginia–based Arent Fox. the center. Rose Associates operates throughout the . Minneapolis, Minnesota, February 22–25, 2010 3 About ULI Advisory Services he goal of ULI’s Advisory Services Pro gram A major strength of the program is ULI’s unique is to bring the finest expertise in the real ability to draw on the knowledge and expertise of estate field to bear on complex land use plan- its members, including land developers and own- ning and development projects, programs, ers, public officials, academics, representatives of T financial institutions, and others. In fulfillment of the and policies. Since 1947, this program has assem- bled well over 400 ULI-member teams to help mission of the Urban Land Institute, this advisory sponsors find creative, practical solutions for services panel report is intended to pro vide objective issues such as downtown redevelopment, land advice that will promote the re spon­­­sible use of land management strategies, evaluation of develop- to enhance the environment. ment potential, growth management, community revitalization, brownfields redevelopment, mili- Rose Center Staff tary base reuse, provision of low-cost and afford- Jess Zimbabwe able housing, and asset management strategies, Executive Director, Rose Center among other matters. A wide variety of public, private, and nonprofit organizations have con- Gideon Berger tracted for ULI’s advisory services. Fellowship Director, Rose Center Each panel team is composed of highly qualified Advisory Services Staff professionals who volunteer their time to ULI. They Marta V. Goldsmith are chosen for their knowledge of the panel topic and Senior Vice President, Community/Education screened to ensure their objectivity. ULI’s interdis- Provost ciplinary panel teams provide a holistic look at devel- opment problems. A re spected ULI member who has Thomas W. Eitler previous panel experience chairs each panel. Vice President, Advisory Services The agenda for a panel assignment is in tensive. It Caroline Dietrich includes an in-depth briefing composed of a tour of the Panel Associate, Advisory Services site and meetings with spon­­­sor representatives; hour- long interviews of key community representatives; and Publications Staff a day of formulating recommendations. Long nights of James A. Mulligan discussion precede the panel’s conclusions. On the final Managing Editor day on site, the panel makes an oral presentation of its findings and conclusions to the sponsor. A written re- Kimberley Todd port is pre pared and published. Manuscript Editor Because the sponsoring entities are responsible for sig- Betsy VanBuskirk nificant preparation before the panel’s vis it, including Creative Director sending extensive briefing materials to each member Anne Morgan and arranging for the panel to meet with key local Graphic Designer community members and stakeholders in the project under consideration, participants in ULI’s panel as- Craig Chapman signments are able to make accurate assessments of a Senior Director, Publishing Operations sponsor’s issues and to provide recommendations in a compressed amount of time. 4 A Rose Center Advisory Services Program Report Acknowledgments he ULI Rose Center would like to thank John Shardlow, and John Breitinger of ULI Min- Minneapolis mayor R.T. Rybak, Minne- nesota for their time and assistance during the apolis public works director and city engi- panel’s visit. neer Steven Kotke, Minneapolis city coun- T Interviews were conducted with numerous cil member Gary Schiff, and Minneapolis planning director Barbara Sporlein for agreeing to be Rose stakeholders, including elected officials, commu- Center fellows and for acting as hosts for this Ad- nity and business organizations, representatives visory Services panel. of the real estate and urban design professions, Hennepin County, the Central Corridor Funders Special thanks go to Cara Letofsky of the Mayor’s Collaborative, and the University of Minnesota. Office; Mark Garner, Paul Mogush, Haila Maze, These stakeholders provided invaluable informa- and Joseph Bernard of the Community Planning tion and diverse perspectives that aided the panel and Economic Development Department; Kelly in its analysis. The panel thanks all those who Moriarity and Ruben Vazquez of the Public Works gave their time to be part of the process. Department; and Caren Dewar, Colleen M. Carey, Minneapolis, Minnesota, February 22–25, 2010 5 ULI Rose Center Minneapolis Fellows R.T. Rybak Gary Schiff Mayor City Council Member, Ward 9 Steven Kotke Barbara Sporlein Public Works Director and City Engineer Planning Director ULI Panel Panel Chair Panel Members Abe Farkas Frank Fuller Development Services Director, ECONorthwest Principal, Field Paoli Architects Portland, Oregon San Francisco, California Michael J. Maxwell Managing Partner, Maxwell + Partners, LLC Miami Shores, Florida Pamela
Recommended publications
  • Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Expressbusservice”
    Maple Grove Transit 2016 “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey Report of Results December 2016 Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road • Suite 300 • Boulder, Colorado 80301 • t: 303-444-7863 • www.n-r-c.com Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Survey Background ...................................................................................................................4 Survey Results ...........................................................................................................................4 Appendix A: Verbatim Responses to Open-ended Survey Questions .................................... 34 Appendix B: Select Results Compared by Respondent Race/Ethnicity .................................. 92 Appendix C: Copy of Survey Questionnaire .......................................................................... 107 National Research Center, Inc. Report of Results Prepared by Maple Grove Transit “Express Bus Service” Customer Survey December 2016 List of Tables Table 1: Question 1................................................................................................................................................ 4 Table 2: Question 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 3: Question 3 Compared by Question 1 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Transit Schedule Green Line
    Metro Transit Schedule Green Line Clemmie usually overprice tetragonally or recommit abiogenetically when whole-wheat Nev chaws unsympathetically and diversely. calksFree-hearted it nobbily. Lou fractured irresponsibly or bowsing head-on when Randall is sighted. Anson please her apriorists hand-to-hand, she Also angers you as scheduled departures from? Metro green line train at metro green line entered service schedule for campus including a project in minnesota? Paul connection seemed most visible on. Trains are their green line. Reduce the schedules with muni transit officials that perfect is the green line connects the metro transit system. Battle creek apartments, every time does deter on gull road rapid station in south near vehicle and healthy travel times in a tough. Washington avenue bridge was a metro transit, and schedules and has provided during harsh minnesota? Anderson center can directly. Upcoming holidays and schedules unless public locations and lake calhoun in our competitors order these trains. Metro transit planners chose university, metro transit agency will follow signs last? Metro transit and metro transit, schedule in downtown minneapolis. Turns out schedules vary by the metro green line is no regular saturday schedules beginning wednesday that litter is currently available. Transit riders will continue to downgrade reqeust was a vacant lot next to change. Metro transit report said engineers have been personalized. Paul and schedules beginning wednesday that make it back door. Paul with metro transit. You need to discuss the metro area in cardiac surgery at afrik grocery. Please visit one part in minnesota transportation systems to get from the downtown minneapolis guide to have collaborated on weekends; please enable scripts and take? Green line green hop fastpass is considered time improvements for metro transit projects along university avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • June 14, 2014: Grand Opening for METRO Green Line
    January 22, 2014 Contact: Laura Baenen, 651‐602‐1797 Bonnie Kollodge, 651‐602‐1357 June 14, 2014: Grand opening for METRO Green Line (St. Paul) ‐ Light rail between Minneapolis and St. Paul will link Twin Cities residents to neighborhoods and the two downtowns starting Saturday, June 14, with free rides and day‐long community celebrations, Metropolitan Council Chair Sue Haigh said to day. “Starting service 60 years to the month after the last streetcar left the Twin Cities is fitting.” said Haigh, whose work on the METRO Green Line (Central Corridor LRT) dates back to her days on the Ramsey County Board. “For me, seeing two vibrant downtowns, numerous job, education and medical centers, and, tens of thousands of people connected by this project is the most exciting part.” The 11‐mile corridor between the two downtowns links Union Depot in St. Paul’s Lowertown to the State Capitol complex, Midway, University of Minnesota and Target Field. As the region’s second light rail line, the METRO Green Line will connect to the Blue Line (Hiawatha) at Downtown East Station. The mid‐June opening will allow the line to serve baseball fans attending Major League Baseball’s All‐Star Game at Target Field in July. The opening is nearly six months earlier than required by the Federal Transit Administration, which is funding half the $957 million project. The project is on budget. The project created 5,445 construction jobs and $252 million in construction payroll, with workers coming from more than 60 Minnesota counties ranging from the Canadian border to Iowa.
    [Show full text]
  • List of LCA Awards by City
    Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grants by City, 1996-Present City Grant Name Fund Funding Year Awarded Amount Relinquished Amount Anoka Anoka Station Area Master Planning LCDA 2011 $22,500 $0 Anoka Greenhaven Housing LCDA 2010 $75,000 $0 Anoka IMI Cornelius (fka Eniva) TBRA 2007 $339,000 $101,162 Anoka Anoka North Central Business District LCDA 2005 $1,000,000 $0 Anoka Heart of Anoka LCDA 2001 $70,000 $0 Anoka North Central Business District TBRA 2001 $116,870 $0 Anoka Total $1,623,370 $101,162 TOD Pre-Development & Repositioning at 147th Street and Garrett Avenue and Glazier Apple Valley Avenue LCDA 2016 $35,000 $0 Apple Valley Village Pointe Plaza LCDA 2014 $1,148,639 $0 Cedar Village West (fka Commons I and Apple Valley Commons II Site Acquisition Assistance) LCDA 2011 $866,000 $866,000 Apple Valley Gathering (fka The Enclave Trails) LCDA 2011 $174,800 $174,800 Cobblestone Lakes Senior Housing & Park Apple Valley Improvement LCDA 2011 $896,000 $0 Market Analysis for the Hanson Concrete Apple Valley Site LCDA 2010 $50,000 $0 Apple Valley Master TOD Development Plan LCDA 2010 $60,000 $0 Apple Valley Cobblestone Senior Housing LCDA 2008 $556,834 $0 Apple Valley Central Village - Legacy Park North LCDA 2005 $425,000 $0 Harmony Commons (fka The Village at Apple Valley Founders Circle) LCDA 2004 $2,356,244 $2,356,244 Apple Valley Lebanon Valley Place LHIA 2003 $150,000 $0 Central Village Small Area Plan - II (fka Apple Valley Galaxie Avenue) LCDA 2002 $30,000 $0 Central Village Small Area Plan - I (fka Apple Valley Galaxie Avenue) LCDA
    [Show full text]
  • METRO GREEN LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    METRO GREEN LINE light rail time schedule & line map METRO GREEN LINE To Mpls-Target Field View In Website Mode The METRO GREEN LINE light rail line (To Mpls-Target Field) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Mpls-Target Field: 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM (2) To St. Paul-Union Depot: 5:06 AM - 11:19 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest METRO GREEN LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next METRO GREEN LINE light rail arriving. Direction: To Mpls-Target Field METRO GREEN LINE light rail Time Schedule 24 stops To Mpls-Target Field Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 4:48 AM - 11:17 PM Monday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM Union Depot Station 208 4th Street East, St. Paul Tuesday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM Central Station Wednesday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 58 5th Street East, St. Paul Thursday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 10th Street Friday 4:33 AM - 11:17 PM 519 Cedar Street, St. Paul Saturday 4:48 AM - 11:17 PM Robert Street 613 Robert Street North, St. Paul Capitol/Rice St 475 Rice Street, St. Paul METRO GREEN LINE light rail Info Direction: To Mpls-Target Field Western Avenue Stops: 24 377 University Avenue West, St. Paul Trip Duration: 46 min Line Summary: Union Depot Station, Central Station, Dale Street 10th Street, Robert Street, Capitol/Rice St, Western 489 Dale Street North, St. Paul Avenue, Dale Street, N Victoria St, Lexington Parkway, Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Fairview N Victoria St Avenue, Raymond Avenue, Westgate, Prospect Park, University Avenue, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Transit: 2018 Annual Regional Park-And-Ride System Report
    2018 ANNUAL REGIONAL PARK-AND-RIDE SYSTEM REPORT JANUARY 2019 Prepared for: Metropolitan Council Metro Transit Minnesota Valley Transit Authority SouthWest Transit Maple Grove Transit Plymouth Metrolink Northstar Link Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Emma Pickett Metro Transit Engineering and Facilities, Planning and Urban Design Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................................3 Capacity Changes........................................................................................................................................6 System Capacity and Usage by Travel Corridor .........................................................................................7 Planned Capacity Expansion .......................................................................................................................8 License Plate User Home Origin Data ........................................................................................................9 About the System Survey ..........................................................................................................................11 Appendix A: Facility Utilization Data .......................................................................................................12 Park-and-Ride System Data .................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • • the Honorable R.T. Rybak • Cara Letofsky, Mayor's Policy Aide
    Thanks to the following people for their help and support in making this panel possible: • The Honorable R.T. Rybak • Cara Letofsky, Mayor’s Policy Aide • Councilmember Gary Schiff • Barbara Sporlein, Mark Garner, Paul Mogush, Haila Maze, Joseph Bernard of CPED • Steve Kotke, Kelly Moriarity, Ruben Vazquez of PW • Caren Dewar, Colleen M. Carey, John Shardlow, John Breitinger of ULI Minnesota Rose Center Advisory Panel Minneapolis, MN February 2010 Minneapolis, Minnesota Implementing a vision for TOD Rose Center Advisory Panel Minneapolis, MN February 2010 What is the Urban Land Institute? The Urban Land Institute (ULI) is a nonprofit research and education organization that focuses on issues of land use and real estate development. ULI’s Mission: To promote leadership in the responsible use of land to create and sustain thriving communities worldwide Rose Center Advisory Panel Minneapolis, MN February 2010 What is the Urban Land Institute? With over 30,000 members worldwide, the heart of the ULI experience is an open exchange of ideas, networking opportunities, and the ability to work with the leaders of the land use industry. Members include: •Developers •Builders •Engineers •Attorneys •Brokers •Planners •Market Analysts •Investors, Bankers and Financiers •Academicians •Architects and Designers •Public officials Rose Center Advisory Panel Minneapolis, MN February 2010 Advisory Services at ULI • Panels since 1947 • 15-20 panels a year • Panel provide independent, objective & candid advice to governments, private firms and non-profits. • Panelists are volunteers; not paid • Process – Review background materials – Receive a sponsor presentation & tour – Conduct stakeholder interviews – Consider data, frame issues and write recommendations – Make presentation – Produce a final report Rose Center Advisory Panel Minneapolis, MN February 2010 ULI Daniel Rose Center for Public Leadership in Land Use Mission Statement “.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Regional Park-And-Ride System Report
    2017 ANNUAL REGIONAL PARK-AND-RIDE SYSTEM REPORT JANUARY 2018 Prepared for: Metropolitan Council Metro Transit Minnesota Valley Transit Authority SouthWest Transit Maple Grove Transit Plymouth Metrolink Northstar Link Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Soobin Choi Metro Transit Engineering and Facilities, Planning and Urban Design 2016 Annual Regional Park-and-Ride System Report | 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................3 Overview ......................................................................................................................................................6 Regional System Profile ...............................................................................................................................7 Capacity Changes........................................................................................................................................8 System Capacity and Usage by Travel Corridor .......................................................................................10 System Capacity and Usage by Transitway ..............................................................................................13 Facilities with Significant Utilization Changes ..........................................................................................15 Utlilization Increase in Large Facilities .................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Route 2 Metrotransit.Org | 612-373-3333
    Local Bus Route 2 metrotransit.org | 612-373-3333 Effective 8/21/21 17 7th St 10 25 61 E Hennepin 10 11 2C 8th St 10th Ave University4th St 4 MAP IS NOT TO SCALE Central 2nd Ave 6 Huntington 15th Ave MISSISSIPPI RIVER Bank Stadium 6 C 33 DINKYTOWN 35W 3 9 C Oak West Bank Station 12 Green Line 2 3 7 22 Ontario Washington 3 8 2A Willey Beacon DOWNTOWN Hall 94 MINNEAPOLIS Washington Fairview University Green Line 7 2E Medical Center 3rd St Fairview Riverside Anderson Medical Center East Bank Station Hall Green Line 2 25th Riverside Cedar Augsburg 11th Ave Portland Park Chicago 6 7 Blue Line University 67 Lyndale Nicollet 94 3rd Ave 9 9 5 14 22 Bloomington Dupont Franklin 19th Ave 2 3 4 A C 5 Franklin 4 17 11 14 9 22nd St 1 Minnehaha 6 113 18 12 Franklin Ave Station Blue Line 2 9 22 67 114 26th Ave Hennepin Map Legend 3 Timepoint on schedule High Frequency Service Find the timepoint nearest your stop, and Service every 15 minutes on weekdays use that column of the schedule. Your stop 6 am – 7 pm and on Saturdays 9 am – 6 pm. may be between timepoints. 22 B Route Ending Point Regular Route Trips with the indicated number/letter end Bus will pick up or drop off customers at at this point. Number/letter is found in any bus stop along this route schedules and on bus destination signs. METRO Line and Stations B Route Letter METRO trains or buses will pick up or drop Indicates which trips travel on this section off customers at any station along this of the route.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Routes to the METRO Green Line LITTLE CANADA
    Connecting routes to the METRO Green Line LITTLE CANADA To LEGEND 87 Shoreview County Road B2 Rosedale METRO Green Line St. Anthony 65 84 36 METRO Blue Line Rosedale Target 36 Transit 83 Commerce Center 84 Bus Routes County Road B 18th Ave NE 65 65 94 Bus Routes - Weekday Only Quarry Center Har Pascal Skillman Rail stations 35W Mar Mall Johnson St NE 83 Broadway 87 0 0.5 1 30 30 NE Minneapolis Industrial Center Roseville 84 65 62 71 Miles St Godward Lauderdale 262 Spring St Fairview 71 Lexington Stinson Blvd NE 280 Snelling Jackson Hennepin Hoover St Larpenteur Larpenteur 68 1st 2 8th Falcon 35E Edgerton Como Eustis Westminster 4th 3 Gortner Heights University Cleveland Dale St 5th University of Timberlake 6 Eckles Minnesota Target Field 6 Elm Kasota Buford St 7th 10th 3 Carter Hamline Warehouse/Hennepin 84 2 University Como 94 4th State Fair Nicollet Mall 6 15th of Minnesota Park L’orient 134 3 Rice Government3 Plaza Como Horton Maryland Downtown East 3 6 7th Stadium Village 3 East River East Raymond East Bank 83 5th 35W 6 30 Gateway 6th West Bank Hennepin 129 2 Prospect Park 3 Nicollet Mall 94 16 Arkwright Oak Energy Park Dr 62 Downtown 134 Front Washington Fulton Case Minneapolis 129 27th 87 262 Jackson 11th 3 2 Riverside Berry Pierce Butler University Westgate Huron Como Cedar 68 Territorial 84 71 Augsburg 94 94 Cedar- College 25th Phalen Blvd Franklin Raymond Fairview Hamline Cayuga Riverside55 67 Franklin 16 University Minnehaha 2 2 67 3 280 67 67 Eustis 63 Prior 68 26th 67 M 87 Thomas 71 35W Franklin I S 94 S 67 I S S Fairview I P Hamline Lexington Capitol/Rice P Snelling Victoria Dale Western 53 I 134 Gilbert University 35E R I V 7th St E 16 16 16 Robert Minneapolis R State 83 65 Capitol Midway 21 12th St 94 87 Marion 94 63 94 94 10th St Concordia Warner Rd To Uptown Lake Union Depot Lake Lake Marshall Marshall University St Paul 21 53 53 21 College Selby Dale St Central 21 6th St Como 68 Downtown St.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Design Presentation
    LRT STATION DESIGN March 24, 2015 1 Today’s Topics • LRT Station 101 § Station Site Elements § Station Platform Elements • Station Design Approach • Station Open Houses 2 LRT Station 101 Station Site Elements 3 Station Site Elements • Park-and-Ride • Kiss-and-Ride • Bus Facilities • Landscape/Streetscape • Stormwater BMPs • Wayfinding • Site Lighting • Bike Parking • Vertical Circulation 4 Station Site Blue Line 28th Avenue Station 5 Park-and-Ride (surface lot) North Star Anoka Station 6 Parking Structure Blue Line 28th Ave Station 7 Passenger Drop Off Blue Line 38th Street Station 8 Bus Facilities Blue Line 46th Street Station 9 Bus Operator Facilities Blue Line 46th Street Station 10 Landscape/Streetscape Green Line Capitol/Rice Street Station 11 Stormwater BMPs: Rain Garden Green Line 12 Site Lighting North Star Coon Rapids Station 13 Bike Parking Green Line 14 Bike Parking Blue Line 46th Street Station 15 Vertical Circulation Green Line West Bank Station 16 LRT Station 101 Station Platform Elements 17 Platform: Center Blue Line 38th Street Station 18 Platform: Side Blue Line 50th St/Minnehaha Park Station 19 Station Elements: Defining Features • Canopy • Overhead Catenary System • Structure • Communication Cabinet • Enclosure • Identification Sign • Platform • Kiosk Map & Schedule • Lighting • Smart Card Validator & • Access Ramp & Railings Ticket Vending Machine • Tactile Warning Edge • Variable Message Signs • Emergency Phone • Speakers • Security Cameras • Heaters • Intertrack Fencing • Furnishings • Active Warning Devices • Integrated
    [Show full text]
  • List of Tables
    List of Tables Table 1 – Crossing Comparison* ...............................................................................................11 Table 2 – West Bank Station Area Year 2030 P.M. Peak V/C Ratio and LOS ...........................47 Table 3 – West Bank Station Area Year 2030 P.M. Peak Queue Lengths .................................47 Table 4 – Stadium Village Station Area Year 2030 PM Peak LOS.............................................48 Table 5 – Historic Properties/NRHP-Listed and NRHP-Eligible — Locally Designated Properties (Not on NRHP).....................................................................................................................53 Table 6 – Next Steps in the Cultural Resources Process ..........................................................56 Table 7 – Parks and Trails Within 350 Feet of the Northern Alignment.....................................58 Table 8 – Population, Households and Race – 2000 Census ...................................................65 Table 9 – Income and Poverty – 2000 Census..........................................................................66 Table 10 – Contaminated Properties .........................................................................................70 Table 11 – Project Area Wells ...................................................................................................71 Table 12 – NEPA Environmental Issues....................................................................................74 Table 13 – Cost Effectiveness Breakpoints ...............................................................................77
    [Show full text]