2010 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Northwest Territories, Chef De Mission - Doug Rentmeister

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2010 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Northwest Territories, Chef De Mission - Doug Rentmeister CHEF DE MISSION FINAL REPORT 2010 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Northwest Territories, Chef de Mission - Doug Rentmeister Section I Evaluation of Performance of the Host Society Registration and Accreditation We had a few issues with the gems system leading up to the games, after our Territorial Trials there was a period where we could not access the system but this got cleared up in a day so it did not evolve into a greater issue. We would like to commend the committee and volunteers in this area as they were very responsive to our needs and concerns. There should be a requirement for any Chef and Asst to meet with the person in charge (in person prior to the games) of this area to go through and update their team list and accreditation needs…saved us a HUGE headache and allowed us to deal with those participants that did not register on time or had missing information effectively and quickly. Welcome/Arrival Services We did not have any issues with the welcome and arrival services, we thought this went over pretty well. We did not see a welcome committee for our arrivals though transportation was well represented and attended to our needs effectively. We received some very positive feedback from our coaches in having their completed accreditation and their respective athletes ready for them at the airport. This should be fostered and encouraged as it really helps in the transition of getting athletes off their plane and into their dorms fully accredited without burdening the coaches. Opening Ceremonies We had huge complaints in having the athletes in the holding area too long before being marshaled out. Considering that all the athletes were in their walkout gear and the holding area had over 2000 people in it, without any water, we were fortunate that we didn’t encounter any medical issues i.e. dehydration, fainting. We would strongly recommend that if the holding area is indoors then it should be conditional that water be supplied or there would be easy access to a source of water. Also the holding area severely lacked any coordination and was largely dependent on the respective Chefs and missions to coordinate. Something that has worked well in the past is to designate areas within the holding area for each specific contingent thereby improving communication and coordination. Another strong recommendation would be to never have the walkout file out in a single line, this really takes away from the team aspect of the walkout and you lose a lot of the energy as a result. In fact our minister commented on that fact when greeting us on the stage and this can be largely attributed to greeting them individually versus as a team. Our final recommendation would be, don’t give media access to athletes in the holding area especially if they are going to be in there for an extended period of time you are just inviting a public relations disaster as was the case with a couple of stories courtesy of the CBC. Team Accommodations We had a lot of positive feedback on the inflatable mattresses used and most thought they were an excellent substitute from the bunk beds of previous AWGs. It would seem that this could be a viable alternative for future games especially if the technology for this item improves to a point where these could be redistributed for future games events. We are sure that the pressure alleviated on Host Societies and volunteers pursuing this option would offset any additional costs purchasing these items. We had feedback that sports should stay together in the dorms for the next games. Though it would create extra burden on mission staffs, a lot of people felt that it would have proven beneficial to get to know other contingent’s respective athletes/coaches off the playing field. Other benefits surrounded around, similar competitive schedules, understanding and respectful of each other’s preparation for competition etc. The shower facilities at each of the accommodations received considerable criticism especially from the participants in the female dorms. There weren’t enough and the ones they had were overused and not readily accessible. Proximity of the female showers to the male showers and lack of security presented a problem. This seemed to become a bigger issue than it needed to be considering the quality of the facilities. The security at the accommodations was an issue at the beginning of the week but got tightened to the middle and end of the week. Though there was security at the main entrance for each dorm there wasn’t to each of the wings which caused some problems. Food Service/Village Dining We felt the food overall was very good; lots of quantity, healthy choices available, cafeteria hours were very good to accommodate athletes on different schedules, etc. We received some feedback that suggested more effort should be put into identifying with the caterer the nutritional needs of athletes. Caterers, especially if they have never provided services to a multi-sports event before are not necessarily aware of the specific needs of athletes performing at the levels expected at AWG. As an example, the caterer had no idea how high the demand for bananas would be to replenish potassium levels after competitions. We realize different sports have different needs. However generally there are many important nutrition needs of athletes, pre and post competition and training. Ensuring these related foods are available and presented up front should be a priority for the AWGIC in order to send the appropriate message to all involved. Some of the less healthy choices of course can continue to be available but should be less obvious in the cafeteria (e.g. things like pizza and greasier foods). A good part of this is education as well and more effort should be spent throughout the entire sport committee to educate athletes in nutrition as a healthy life choice. With respect to the role of the International Committee on this front, we would suggest that more effort be put into the specifications and expectations of food services at AWG to pass on to each Host Society. These specifications could be used as a guide when contracting food services. It could be as specific as designing a menu that one could emulate for each set of games. The standard "list" could be used over and over for each AWG being modified as new nutritional information becomes available. The effort upfront would make things much simpler down the road and guarantee a certain standard of food services at each AWG. The box lunches became too big of an issue throughout the games and that seems to be a consistent theme games to games and we are not sure why satellite kitchens couldn’t be set up at some of the venues i.e. cross country skiing, boardsports. This could have addressed the box lunch issue a bit and taken pressure off catering. It also came known that catering felt under-appreciated throughout the games and there should be strategies incorporated to recognize these folks a bit better which we tried to do as a contingent. Trays would have been nice to carry food/drinks, these were removed after the first day or two to address food wastage though having a menu listing on what was available for that meal at the beginning of the line so you knew what to look for and take would have addressed the problem. Not all food was located in one area, so once you went through area #1, and got to area #2, you realized what you really wanted was in an area further down the line and maybe took more than you wanted because of it. One of our athletes had severe allergies and food items weren’t posted describing what was in each dish as promised which caused some grief. Awards Ceremonies We thought the ceremonies were well done but poorly attended, not sure what the true reason would be aside from location and its limited drawing power. We were always wondering why an awards area would not be better placed near where all the athletes congregated i.e. cafeterias, accommodations so they could attend and support their team’s medal winners. Information Technology/Communications/Computer and Network Services Though the IT services at the mission office were adequate they were not compatible to the host societies, our recommendation would be to ensure they are for future games. IT staff were very helpful and addressed needs and concerns readily. We thought the cell phones worked excellently and were very well used and received though there needs to be something worked out for the end of the week as we could have really used them in coordinating our departures but they had to be submitted back to the Host. Mission Offices, Services and Accommodations The mission offices supplies were appropriate and fulfilled our needs aside from the fact that we had little contact with our coaches. The location was a bit out of the way for them to come to on a regular basis. We did have everyone attend our coaches meeting at the beginning of the week in a meeting room straight across from our mission office to demonstrate where we were and how accessible we could be. We did not have our office staff for the full week as in other games but that did not cause many problems because when they were there they were very diligent and hardworking. There wasn’t as much interaction with the other contingents as you would see when mission offices share a gym or large room which is disappointing and may be that could be looked at for future games.
Recommended publications
  • Arctic Winter Games Team Alaska
    Arctic Winter Games Team Alaska - Games Participation FY2010 Request: $250,000 Reference No: 41959 AP/AL: Appropriation Project Type: Parks / Recreation Category: Development Recipient: Arctic Winter Games Team Alaska Location: Statewide Contact: Amanda Ryder House District: Statewide (HD 1-40) Contact Phone: (907)465-2506 Estimated Project Dates: 07/01/2009 - 06/30/2014 Brief Summary and Statement of Need: This funding will be used for game related costs for 2010 Arctic Winter Games. The games are to be held March, 2010 in Grand Prairie, Alberta Canada. Funding: FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 Total Gen Fund $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Total: $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 State Match Required One-Time Project Phased - new Phased - underway On-Going 0% = Minimum State Match % Required Amendment Mental Health Bill Operating & Maintenance Costs: Amount Staff Project Development: 0 0 Ongoing Operating: 0 0 One-Time Startup: 0 Totals: 0 0 Additional Information / Prior Funding History: FY09 $250,000 SLA08 Ch. 29 Sec. 13, Pg 92, Ln 14; FY08 $250,000 SLA07 Ch. 30 Sec.1, Page 9, Line 12; FY07 $250,000 SLA 2006, Ch. 82, Sec. 1, Page 9, Line 12; FY05 $250,000, FSSLA2005 Ch. 3, Sec. 52d), Page 131, Line 13 Project Description/Justification: For each Arctic Winter Games held since the first games in 1970, the State of Alaska has funded a portion of this program. For Alaska to continue to field a team at future games, continued state support is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Package Figure Skating Technical Package 2010 Arctic Winter Games
    2010 TECHNICAL PACKAGE FIGURE SKATING TECHNICAL PACKAGE 2010 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES FIGURE SKATING 1. RULES: This competition will be conducted under the rules of Skate Canada. 2. CATEGORIES: The competition is open to female athletes only. Competitors must have been born between 1992 and 1999. Skaters in the Preliminary events (Ladies 1) must be born 1997 or later. A competitor may register and compete in only one (1) category. Competitors must meet the minimum and maximum test and age requirements for this competition as stated within the Test Qualifications Section (Attachment A) on this Technical Package as of November 15, 2009. Test qualification forms must be completed in accordance with Arctic Winter Games rules. Elite Athletes Canadian athletes who have qualified for Western Challenge or Junior Nationals or higher in 2009 or 2010 are considered elite and therefore not eligible to compete in the Arctic Winter Games. American athletes who have qualified for Sectional competition (freestyle event only) in 2009 or 2010 are considered elite and therefore not eligible to compete in the Arctic Winter Games. Russian Athletes who are considered elite by the Federal Law of the Russian Federation are not eligible to compete in the Arctic Winter Games. Russian athletes who have qualified as a Master of Sports International, Master of Sports of Russia or are Candidates for the Master of Sports are also considered elite and therefore are not eligible to compete in the Arctic Winter Games. 3. EVENTS: See Attachment B 1. TEAM COMPOSITION: Each Games Unit may enter a team comprised of maximum of eight (8) skaters and two (2) coaches.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEF DE MISSION FINAL REPORT 2012 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Yukon, Chef De Mission ______Section I Evaluation of Performance of the Host Society
    _________________________________________________ CHEF DE MISSION FINAL REPORT 2012 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Yukon, Chef de Mission ________________________________________________________ Section I Evaluation of Performance of the Host Society Registration and Accreditation___________________________________ o Online registration worked well, very little confusion for participants o Kimik functions are helpful for creation of rosters, accurate numbers, etc, but helpful for KIMIK to create a “how to” pull those reports o Registration system was open for input/registration well in advance of Games o We appreciated receiving the accreditation tags and lanyards days in advance of our team pep rally for organization and distribution per team o The process to replace missing tags was convenient Recommendations: . That we continue to receive accreditation tags in advance of team arrival . That a process exists where the contingents and host can include their own required forms with a verify/signature button, within the registration system. Continue to allocate heads to beds through the Kimik system . Continue to open registration approximately 4 months before Games . A quick and easy registration guide can be included to assist those who have questions regarding registration. Welcome/Arrival Services_______________________________________ o As the host team we were happy to assist in checking into our accommodation venues a day later than was planned and communicated. We appreciated being able to check in those two teams that included a variety of athletes from outside of Whitehorse, on the original date o Athletes were welcomed into their accommodation units with smiles, bags and sleeping bags. Thank you for the enthusiasm of the volunteers. Recommendations: . That bags/sleeping bags, be given to the athletes at the accommodation venues .
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Arctic Winter Games Grande Prairie, AB
    A look back at the 2010 Arctic Winter Games Grande Prairie, AB Supplement to HTHE UB HAY RIVER, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES March 17, 2010 To the Participants and Volunteers Yellowknife 867-873-2520 Inuvik 867-777-3532 Aaron Doyle [email protected] Tim Isaacs [email protected] Hay River 867-874-2303 Fort Simpson 867-445-6330 in the 2010 Arctic Winter Games Duncan Cooke [email protected] David McCann [email protected] www.arcan.nt.ca 2 ▼ WEDNESDAY, MARCH 17, 2010 The Hub - Arctic Winter Games 2010 NWT Bantams bring home the gold “Th e Alberta game was tough,” he said. Bantams win over “Th e NWT almost never beats Al- berta.” Nunavut for gold; But Alberta was an obstacle that could not get in the way of the NWT’s gold junior girls a step medal. “We were worn out completely,” said Gavin. away from bronze; “Th ere was nothing left in us by the end, but we did it.” Midgets fail in bid Carter was fortunate enough to win a gold ulu at his fi rst ever AWG. to qualify for fi nals “I knew we had a chance,” he said. “We did really good. I’m really excited.” DIANA YEAGER Connor kept a tight ship over at his [email protected] net, but for him, it was just business as usual. Helmets and gloves fl ew off as the “I just did what I usually do,” he said. buzzer rang at the end of the Bantams’ “Being consistent is the key.” gold game. Th e rink was a blur of blue Th is was Connor’s fi rst medal, as well.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Nunavut, Kyle Seeley, Chef De Mission
    CHEF DE MISSION FINAL REPORT 2010 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Nunavut, Kyle Seeley, Chef de Mission Section I – Evaluation of Performance of the Host Society Registration and Accreditation Was pre-Games registration convenient and functional? Did the accreditation system at the Games work well? Provide comments or recommendations Comments The on line registration process continues to improve and worked very well from a “user” perspective. Access to the on line registration data base seemed to be delayed Many of the issues related to the data base were due to photo quality, size, and appropriateness. Recommendations Access to the data base in December would be ideal from a data entry perspective A photo cropping tool for the accreditation tag identification photos within the system would be very helpful Bunk assignments incorporated into the “approval” phase within the data base should be considered. Welcome / Arrival Services Was the arrival of your team handled in a timely manner with a minimum of confusion? Provide comments or recommendations Comments: Airport arrival and ground transportation to accommodation venues went well. Mascot and greeting committee at the airport were appreciated Hand made signage was noted by many as a nice touch Baggage was delivered to the residences effectively Baggage tags tended to detach from bags Recommendations: Distribute baggage tags earlier Identify baggage tag requirements to hosts for future games (no elastic/paper) Include Missions Staff and Special Guests, Officials in baggage tag plan (eg designated tags for these groups) Y:\Sport Nunavut\Sport Nunavut\Arctic Winter Games\2010AWG\Chefs Report\TEAM NUChef de Mission Final Report.doc Page 1 of 25 TEAM NUChef de Mission Final Report.doc Version: 6/8/2010 Opening Ceremonies Did the Opening Ceremonies do a good job of kicking off the week? Were they well-organized and choreographed? Provide comments or recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEF DE MISSION FINAL REPORT 2012 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Alberta North, Chef De Mission
    CHEF DE MISSION FINAL REPORT 2012 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Alberta North, Chef de Mission Section I Evaluation of Performance of the Host Society Registration and Accreditation The registration was set up well in advance but again some of the suggested changes were not implemented (i.e. coaches assigned to a team) The system is easy to input information by participants. We really appreciated receiving the accreditation tags in advance to the arrival of our participants so that Mission Staff could distribute them to their assigned sport teams. Recommendations In the future all contingents continue to receive from the Host Society the registration system no later than the beginning of December to assist in ensuring the completeness of the registrations and forms as well as providing an adequate time frame for the participants to register. The Host Society waiver form must accompany the registration system when it is provided to the Chefs. That the contingents be allowed to add their own custom fields on the registration form and attach their own documents, e.g. Team Alberta North Code of Conduct. Continue to receive the accreditation tags in advance of the participants arrival so that the contingents can verify and distribute them to the teams Welcome/Arrival Services Arrival at the airport and transferring of participants to busses for school drop offs was very smooth. Once the luggage and sports equipment was loaded, it appeared that it arrived at the schools and sport venues fairly efficiently. Team Alberta North did not have any lost luggage. Luggage and equipment tags were provided in advance but similarity between luggage and equipment tags caused some confusion.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Arctic Winter Games
    2010 Arctic Winter Games: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada Personal, Social, and Community Benefits of Participation Prepared for and Supported by Arctic Winter Games International Committee NWT Municipal and Community Affairs Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada Table A-1. Factor 1 Loadings [N=924], Alpha=.8915 Items Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 Coefficients Coefficients Coefficients Coefficients Coefficients Provides interesting experiences which I can tell my friends afterwards 0.778 -0.238 -0.430 0.384 0.417 Gives me the chance for new adventures and excitement 0.770 -0.249 -0.455 0.434 0.409 Gives me opportunity to enjoy sports 0.768 -0.272 -0.326 0.464 0.307 Brings happy memories after Games 0.746 -0.293 -0.389 0.357 0.404 To have fun 0.656 -0.138 -0.388 0.427 0.410 Helps me respect myself for doing these things 0.632 -0.565 -0.449 0.445 0.365 Gives me a chance to see other towns/places 0.594 -0.316 -0.312 0.252 0.281 2010 Arctic Winter Games: Personal, Social, and Community Benefits of Participation Prepared by Dr. Samuel V. Lankford World Leisure Professional Services (WPS) Dr. Larry L. Neal Pacific Northwest Area Representative World Leisure Professional Services (WPS) Courtney Bonwell Research Assistant University of Northern Iowa Ashley Cunningham Research Assistant University of Northern Iowa Samuel Walter Research Assistant University of Northern Iowa Prepared for and Supported by Arctic Winter Games International Committee NWT Municipal and Community Affairs Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Event Analysis and Economic Impact Study
    2010 Arctic Winter Games Grande Prairie, Alberta March 2010 Event Analysis And Economic Impact Study Submitted to Recreation and Sport Development Division Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation Submitted by Econometric Research Limited July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3 2. ANALYSIS HI‐LIGHTS‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3 2. EVENT ANALYSIS‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 4‐11 A) About the Arctic Winter Games 4 B) Background of Grande Prairie 4 ‐ 5 C) Perspective for the Games 5 ‐ 6 D) Financial Management 6 ‐ 7 E) Sponsorship and Fundraising 8 F) Grant Funding 8 G) Media 8‐9 H) Volunteers 9 I) Sport and Cultural Events 9‐10 J) Community Health & Wellness 10 K) Sponsorship & Volunteer Recruitment Challenges 10 L) Planned Opportunities & Considerations 10‐11 M) Legacy Plans 11 3. ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 12‐32 A) Overview 12 B) Methodology 12 C) Summary Findings 13 D) Assumptions, Facts & Information 13‐14 E) Inputs 14‐16 F) Province Wide Impacts 16‐23 G) Impacts in Grande Prairie & Region 24‐31 H) Conclusions 32 I) Disclaimer 33‐34 A. General Assumptions 33 B. The Substitution Effect 33 C. The Crowd‐Out Effect 33 D. The Path of Money Spent 33 E. Non‐Economic Costs 33 F. Conflict of Interest 33 G. Limited Liability 34 H. Freedom of Information Act 34 4. DEFINITIONS ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 2010
    Final Report 2010 General Unit Management The Kativik Regional Government (KRG) Recreation Department has been responsible for the administration, coordination and participation of Team Nunavik Quebec at the Arctic Winter Games (AWG) since 2000. Since then, Team Nunavik Quebec has participated as guest unit with limited participation in selected events. The 2010 AWG were held in Grande Prairie, Alberta. As in the past, the region received financial and manpower contributions from the provincial, and regional organizations; including the Minister of Education, Sports, and Leisure (Quebec Government), Ungaluk Program, Makivik Corporation, Saputiit Youth Association, Kativik School Board, Cree School Board, Tulattavik Hospital, and KRG. Local recreation and education facilities were used in many municipalities in the region to support, train, and encourage our youth. Preparation for Grande Prairie was began in the fall of 2008 with regional events. At the “Games”, team Nunavik-Quebec was successful in many aspects. Mission staff, coaches and athletes were consistent in making strong efforts to respond to the many AWG tasks and challenges, while returning with many medals. The Chef de Mission presence and leadership of Jean Dupuis contributed a strong support and direction for all of the delegation. Planning and operations set up by Assistant Chef de Mission Jennifer Matchett, was instrumental in helping all team members focus their efforts on a successful participation. Administrative support and engagement by the KRG Executive and Council from beginning to end ensured that the plan worked. Accommodations Regional Trials During the regional tryouts, the prospective athletes were hosted by families, schools, and youth centers in the villages where the trials were held.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Arctic Winter Games
    ARCTIC WINTER GAMES POLICIES CHEF DE MISSION FINAL REPORT 2010 ARCTIC WINTER GAMES Team Yukon, Chef de Mission Section I Evaluation of Performance of the Host Society Registration and Accreditation - Was pre-Games registration convenient and functional? o Online registration worked very well, few complaints by participants o Kimik functions, from the registration site, are very helpful o On-line registration began too late - Did the accreditation system at the Games work well? o We appreciated receiving the accreditation tags and lanyards days in advance of teams arriving in order to organize and package per team. o We were missing quite a few tags, but the process to replace those was clear, and the volunteers were fantastic. o For those athletes who were replacements, or who registered really late, accrediting them at the airport was convenient. - Provide comments or recommendations o Begin the registration process, host initiated, at least 4 months out from start of the Games. A quick and easy registration process, that teams can send out to their participants, is preferable. o Continue to hand out completed accreditation tags to the Chefs days in advance of teams arriving. Welcome/Arrival Services - Was the arrival of your team handled in a timely manner with a minimum of confusion o Baggage tags had to be duct taped onto all participant luggage to ensure they did not rip off during transport. o Nice that the mascot was there upon athlete arrival, as well as media. o The solution to separate non-participant luggage upon arrival changed a couple of times, at no fault to the host.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Winter Games Social Impact Study Results 2010
    2010 Arctic Winter Games: Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada Personal, Social, and Community Benefits of Participation Prepared for and Supported by Arctic Winter Games International Committee NWT Municipal and Community Affairs Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada Table A-1. Factor 1 Loadings [N=924], Alpha=.8915 Items Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 Coefficients Coefficients Coefficients Coefficients Coefficients Provides interesting experiences which I can tell my friends afterwards 0.778 -0.238 -0.430 0.384 0.417 Gives me the chance for new adventures and excitement 0.770 -0.249 -0.455 0.434 0.409 Gives me opportunity to enjoy sports 0.768 -0.272 -0.326 0.464 0.307 Brings happy memories after Games 0.746 -0.293 -0.389 0.357 0.404 To have fun 0.656 -0.138 -0.388 0.427 0.410 Helps me respect myself for doing these things 0.632 -0.565 -0.449 0.445 0.365 Gives me a chance to see other towns/places 0.594 -0.316 -0.312 0.252 0.281 2010 Arctic Winter Games: Personal, Social, and Community Benefits of Participation Prepared by Dr. Samuel V. Lankford World Leisure Professional Services (WPS) Dr. Larry L. Neal Pacific Northwest Area Representative World Leisure Professional Services (WPS) Courtney Bonwell Research Assistant University of Northern Iowa Ashley Cunningham Research Assistant University of Northern Iowa Samuel Walter Research Assistant University of Northern Iowa Prepared for and Supported by Arctic Winter Games International Committee NWT Municipal and Community Affairs Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities Guide
    SPORTS FACILITIES GUIDE WWW.CITYOFGP.COM COVER PHOTO BY Morgan Reid Any questions regarding this publication can be directed to: City of Grande Prairie, Economic Development Department PHONE 780.538.0475 | EMAIL [email protected] | WWW.CITYOFGP.COM Please contact independent venues with specific questions regarding meeting spaces and accommodations. ____________________________________ The information in this publication has been compiled from sources deemed reliable. While every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy of this guide, some information is subject to change without notice. This guide is intended as an information source and does not imply endorsement of any service, association or organizations. The City of Grande Prairie will not be responsible for any loss, damage or claim arising from or related to an interpretation, use or reliance on the information contained in this publication. a highlight of sport in Grande Prairie Grande Prairie is a community of choice to host high-calibre sport, recreation and cultural events. With world-class facilities, major airline and public transportation services, more than 3,000 hotel rooms and plenty of dining and shopping, Grande Prairie is a premier destination for many events. Coming up, Grande Prairie is honoured to host the 2017 Alberta Provincial Boxing Championships, the Alberta 55+ Provincial Curling Championships and the 2018 Alberta Summer Games. Past successes include the 2010 Arctic Winter Games, 2014 Senior Men’s Provincial Fastball Championship, 2014 Racquetball Canada Junior Nationals, 2015 Special Olympics Alberta Winter Games, 2015 Alberta Lacrosse Minor Box Provincial Championships, 2015 Tour of Alberta, 2015 Home Hardware Canada Cup of Curling and the 2016 Scotties Tournament of Hearts.
    [Show full text]