DOCSLIB.ORG

Hobbledown Farm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HOBBLEDOWN FARM Preliminary Ecological Appraisal ECO01598 Hobbledown Farm Final April 2021 rpsgroup.com REPORT Document status Version Purpose of document Authored by Reviewed by Approved by Review date Draft Planning application SB KS KS 22/12/20 Final Planning application SB KS KS 19/03/21 Final Planning application SB KS KS 14/03/21 Approval for issue Isaac Phillips [Signature] 14 April 2021 The report has been prepared for the exclusive use and benefit of our client and solely for the purpose for which it is provided. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by RPS Group Plc, any of its subsidiaries, or a related entity (collectively 'RPS') no part of this report should be reproduced, distributed or communicated to any third party. RPS does not accept any liability if this report is used for an alternative purpose from which it is intended, nor to any third party in respect of this report. The report does not account for any changes relating to the subject matter of the report, or any legislative or regulatory changes that have occurred since the report was produced and that may affect the report. The report has been prepared using the information provided to RPS by its client, or others on behalf of its client. To the fullest extent permitted by law, RPS shall not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by the client arising from fraud, misrepresentation, withholding of information material relevant to the report or required by RPS, or other default relating to such information, whether on the client’s part or that of the other information sources, unless such fraud, misrepresentation, withholding or such other default is evident to RPS without further enquiry. It is expressly stated that no independent verification of any documents or information supplied by the client or others on behalf of the client has been made. The report shall be used for general information only. Prepared for: Hobbledown Farm Prepared by: RPS Sam Barker Ecologist 20 Western Avenue Milton Park Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SH T +44 1235 821 888 E [email protected] ECO01598 | Hobbledown Farm | Final | April 2021 rpsgroup.com Page i REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive summary should include: • RPS were commissioned by Hobbledown Farm to undertake a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal of an area of land within Hobbledown Farm, Epsom, Surrey. This comprised a desk study, Phase 1 Habitat Survey and an ecological scoping survey which assessed the potential of the site to support species of conservation concern or other species which could present a constraint to the development of the site. • The development proposals involve the creation of a new water play area comprising formation of shallow water features and erection of play equipment and associated structures within an existing farm park. • The site is approximately 0.3 ha in size and comprises grassland, a hedgerow, an existing zipwire and some juvenile trees. The surrounding land contains a small woodland copse, hedgerows, childrens play park, livestock pens and enclosures, areas of recreation grassland and footpaths. • The Preliminary Ecological Appraisal desk study identified 20 statutory designated sites within 5 km of the site and four non-statutory designated sites within 2 km of the site. The closest designated site was Horton Country Park Site of Nature Conservation Importance (SNCI) approximately 0.09 km from site. • The Phase 1 Habitat Survey identified that the site was predominantly an amenity grassland field. A native species-rich hedgerow was present along the northern boundary, wuth juvenile trees along the south of the site. A bark based zipwire and bare ground footpath were present in the east of the site. • The habitats on site provide some potential to support protected and notable species including birds, foraging and commuting bats, badgers and suitable terrestrial amphibian habitat. • A total of eight ponds were identified within 250 m of the site boundary. A Great Crested Newt (GCN) Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) survey of the four ponds on site identified that one pond provided Average suitability for GCN. The other three ponds were all assessed as providing Poor suitability for GCN. • A badger survey was also conducted at the same time as the Phase 1 Habitat Survey. No evidence of badgers or their setts were recorded within the site or 30 m from application boundary. • It is recommended that a GCN eDNA survey is undertaken on the pond that was identified as being of Average potential to support GCN (Pond 1). • No other protected species surveys are recommended but mitigation and enhancement measures have been provided. • Mitigation measures include, timing of vegetation removal to avoid the nesting bird season, retaining as many of the trees as possible. • Enhancement measures could include providing bird boxes within the site. ECO01598 | Hobbledown Farm | Final | April 2021 rpsgroup.com Page i REPORT Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... I Executive summary should include: .......................................................................................................... i 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and scope of this report ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study area ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Development proposals ................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Legislation and policy ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Desk Study ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Ecological Appraisal ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 GCN Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) Assessment .......................................................................... 4 2.4 Badger Survey................................................................................................................................ 5 2.5 Impact Appraisal ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.6 Limitations ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Designated Sites ............................................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Species .........................................................................................................................................11 3.3 Phase 1 Habitat Survey ...............................................................................................................13 3.4 GCN Habitat Suitability ................................................................................................................15 3.5 Badger Survey..............................................................................................................................15 3.6 Ecological Scoping Survey ...........................................................................................................17 4 EVALUATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ........................................................................................18 4.1 Designated sites ...........................................................................................................................18 4.2 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................18 4.3 Species .........................................................................................................................................18 5 MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT ....................................................................................................20 5.1 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................20 5.2 Species .........................................................................................................................................20 5.3 Enhancement opportunities .........................................................................................................20 6 CONCLUSIONS .....................................................................................................................................21 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................22 Tables Table 3.1: Statutory designated sites within 5 km and non-statutory designated sites within 2
Recommended publications
  • Applicant's Operating Schedule and Other Supporting Documents

    Applicant's Operating Schedule and Other Supporting Documents

    Annex 6 Mandatory Conditions 1. No supply of alcohol may be made at a time when there is no designated premises supervisor in respect of this licence. 2. No supply of alcohol many be made at a time when the designated premises supervisor does not hold a personal licence or the personal licence is suspended. 3. Every supply of alcohol under this licence must be made or authorised by a person who holds a personal licence. 4. 4.1 The responsible person shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that staff on relevant premises do not carry out, arrange or participate in any irresponsible promotions in relation to the premises. 4.2 In this paragraph, an irresponsible promotion means any one or more of the following activities, or substantially similar activities, carried on for the purpose of encouraging the sale or supply of alcohol for consumption on the premises in a manner which carries a significant risk of leading or contributing to crime and disorder, prejudice to public safety, public nuisance, or harm to children – a) games or other activities which require or encourage, or are designed to require or encourage, individuals to – I. drink a quantity of alcohol within a time limit (other than to drink alcohol sold or supplied on the premises before the cessation of the period in which the responsible person is authorised to sell or supply alcohol), or II. drink as much alcohol as possible (whether within a time limit or otherwise). b) provision of unlimited or unspecified quantities of alcohol free or for a fixed or discounted fee to
  • Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation X Kingston Upon Thames

    Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation X Kingston Upon Thames

    Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation x Kingston upon Thames Final report Prepared by LUC April 2021 Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Kingston upon Thames Project Number 11119 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft report for client comment R. Turner D. Green D. Green 02.10.2020 A. Coleman T. Hicks 2. Final Report R. Turner D. Green D. Green 11.12.2020 3. Final Report – updated in light of R. Turner R. Turner R. Turner 30.04.2021 comments from the client. Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation December 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background 1 Planning Policy Context 1 Chapter 2 Method 4 Site Selection 4 Desk Review 4 Site Survey 4 Site Evaluation 5 Phase 1 Habitat Survey 6 Limitations and Constraints 7 Chapter 3 Summary of the SINC Assessment 8 Summary 8 Recommendations 8 Summary of SINC Review 10 Appendix A Figure 1.1-1.3: Biodiversity Assets in the Borough A-1 Appendix B Figure 3: Summary of SINC Review Recommendations B-1 Appendix C Summary of SINC Review C-1 Appendix D Proformas D-1 LUC I i -Chapter 1 Introduction Review of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation December 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction LUC was appointed in May 2020 by the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames to undertake a review of existing and potential Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) within the borough.
  • K2 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    K2 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    K2 bus time schedule & line map K2 Hook View In Website Mode The K2 bus line (Hook) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Hook: 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM (2) Kingston Hospital: 5:30 AM - 11:36 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest K2 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next K2 bus arriving. Direction: Hook K2 bus Time Schedule 35 stops Hook Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM Monday 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM Kingston Hospital (NJ) Tuesday 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM Norbiton Station (NA) Coombe Road, London Wednesday 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM Station Road (NV) Thursday 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM Friday 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM Gordon Road (NW) 144 London Road, London Saturday 12:00 AM - 11:40 PM Norbiton Church / Ti∆n Boys School (C) Eden Street (D2) 82 Eden Street, London K2 bus Info Direction: Hook Brook Street (F) Stops: 35 Brook Street, London Trip Duration: 39 min Line Summary: Kingston Hospital (NJ), Norbiton Kingston Univ County Hall (Ua) Station (NA), Station Road (NV), Gordon Road (NW), 3 Grove Crescent, London Norbiton Church / Ti∆n Boys School (C), Eden Street (D2), Brook Street (F), Kingston Univ County Hall Surbiton Crescent (B) (Ua), Surbiton Crescent (B), Maple Road (C), The Surbiton Road, London Crescent Claremont Road (NH), Surbiton Stationclaremont Rd (Nk), St Mark's Church (NL), Maple Road (C) Berrylands Road (SQ), Parklands (N), Regent Road 15 Surbiton Crescent, London (E), The Ridings, The Berrylands / Berrylands Station (B), Pembroke Avenue, The Roystons (S), Pine The Crescent Claremont
  • Usrn Street Name Ownership Class 21800001 Arnold

    Usrn Street Name Ownership Class 21800001 Arnold

    USRN STREET_NAME OWNERSHIP CLASS 21800001 ARNOLD DRIVE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800002 BENHAM CLOSE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800003 DEVEY CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800004 BROUGH CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800005 CAMEL GROVE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800006 CHIVENOR GROVE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800007 COPPARD GARDENS Adopted Under Highways Act 21800008 DEBDEN CLOSE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800009 GOLDING CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800011 HORNCHURCH CLOSE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800012 HORSLEY DRIVE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800013 HUBBARD DRIVE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800014 KESTREL CLOSE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800015 LANSDOWNE CLOSE Deemed to be Highway Dedicated 21800016 LOFTHOUSE PLACE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800017 MANSTON GROVE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800018 MERLING CLOSE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800019 MERRITT GARDENS Adopted Under Highways Act 21800020 MITFORD CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800021 NICHOLS CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800022 NORTHWEALD LANE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800023 POWELL CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800024 RAY CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800025 SALAMANDER CLOSE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800026 SIMMONS CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800027 SMEATON CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800029 VIDLER CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800030 WITHERS CLOSE Privately Maintained 21800031 WITTERING CLOSE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800032 YEOVILTON PLACE Adopted Under Highways Act 21800033 ACACIA GROVE Deemed to be Highway Dedicated 21800035 ADAMS CLOSE Adopted Under
  • Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report

    Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report

    Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study Final Report Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street, London, W1T 4BQ, United Kingdom www.arup.com Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Document Verification Job title Landscape Sensitivity and Strategic Views Study Job number 263905-00 Document title Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study-Final Report Final 30/01/19 Description Draft issue Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Christopher Wright Andrew Tempany Tom Armour Signature Revision Date Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 263905-00 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Landscape Assessment Methodology 5 3.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Summary Findings 17 4.0 Landscape Sensitivity Study Analysis and Recommendations 25 5.0 Appendices 177 Elmbridge Borough Council Elmbridge Borough Landscape Sensitivity Study: Final Report | January 2019 1.0 Introduction Scope and purpose of the Landscape What
  • Buses from Surbiton Hill

    Buses from Surbiton Hill

    Buses from Surbiton Hill N65 281 TEDDINGTON continues to K3 Hounslow Ealing Broadway Roehampton Vale High Street ASDA Bus Station Broad Street Upper Teddington Road Lower Teddington HOUNSLOW for Teddington Wofngton Close Road Robin Hood Way Fulwell Shops Teddington Hampton Wick Kingsgate Stanley Road Road Hounslow Lock Bowness Crescent Treaty Centre Wood Street for Bentall Centre Kingston Hill Twickenham Green NORBITON Kingston University Hounslow Kingston London Road Kinston Hill River Thames Cromwell Road London Road George Road Bus Station Tifn School Norbiton Church Norbiton High Street Kingston High Street Guildhall/Rose Theatre Whitton Twickenham Twickenham East Lane K2 71 406 Kingston Admiral Nelson Stadium Hospital 418 465 K1 BusesTWICKENHAM from Surbiton HillKingston Hall Road Penrhyn Road Kingston Crown Court Eden Street /Kingston College Penrhyn Road Kingston University/County Hall Brook Street KINGSTONN65 281 TEDDINGTON continues to K3 Faireld South Hounslow Ealing Broadway Roehampton Vale High Street Villiers Road Dawson Road ASDA Bus Station Broad Street Upper Teddington Road Lower Teddington for Teddington Wofngton Close Surbiton RoadRoad Robin Hood Way HOUNSLOW Villiers Road Athelstan Park Fulwell Milestone House Penrhyn Road Shops Teddington Hampton Wick Kingsgate Stanley Road Kingston University Road Hounslow Lock Surbiton Road Villiers Road Lower Marsh Lane Bowness Crescent Treaty Centre Penrhyn Road Wood Street for Bentall Centre F R A Kingston Hill O S A Hampton s S NORBITON Kingston University D E Twickenham Green
  • Surbiton Mast B B

    Surbiton Mast B B

    Kingston upon Thames RBK Tolworth Ward Proposed boundary Boundary Review Electoral Commission Ward Boundary Proposal RBK proposals for Berrylands Ward Original RBK Ward Boundary Proposal Publication date: 30/07/2020 Operator: TL Produced by the Enabling & Emerging Technologies Team Digital & IT, ¯ The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames, b Third Floor West, Guildhall 2, High Street, 0 0.2 0.4Kilometresb b 6 6 6 6 6 6 b Scale 1:10,000 b Kingston upon Thames, KT1 1EU b b b b b b b b 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 b 98 8 8 8 8 8 b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b ROAD WILLOW 9 9 9b b b b b ATHE b 8 b 8 8 8 8 8 b 6 6 6 6 6 6 b LST b D ANR b b OAD b A b b b O D 6 9 6b 9 6 9 6 9 6 9 6 9 b b b b G Kingston b 9 9 R A b b b b b b b R Sewage 8 8 b 8b 8 8 8 8A b b Norbiton Ward b b O b b b O b I b b b b b b b V b b b EL b N R b b b B b A b b N Works b R E b b b b b b b G b b E R O A b OVE b I b b b L b b b b b b A b b F b NE b b b I A b 9 9 9 b b b b b 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 b b 6 6 L 6 G 6 D b Town b 8 8 8b b 8 8 8 b b b b b U b A b b b B U C K IN G H A M R O A D b b b b b b b b b b R A b b b b C b b b b b b b b F b b b b b b b D b bb b 6 6 b 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 O b O b b b b b b b O b b b b b b b b b b b b b b A D E b b b b b b b R b b H b b b BALMORAL ROAD BALMORAL b b b b b R b 9 9 b A b b b b b b b O b G b 8 8 8 8 8 b 8 8 b b S b b b b 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 b 9 b 9 9 9 b b b Ward b S b T b b b b b b b b b b b b b b R b O b b Drain b b b R b b b b b b b b b b U R b b b b A b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b E b b b b R b b b R b b b b b b b b O I b b b V b b b b D b b b b 9 9 Track9
  • 13 Berrylands Origins and General Character

    13 Berrylands Origins and General Character

    13 Berrylands Origins and General Character The Area is bounded by the railway line in the north, the Hogsmill river in the east and the A3 to the south. The western edge of the area abuts the older, Victorian areas of Surbiton around the King Charles Road area. Regent Road and Seymour Gardens now occupy the site where Regent House, built around 1890, once stood. It was the first significant building within the Area. Berry- lands Road was extended into the Area around 1890, and Berrylands Farm, formerly Berry Lodge Farm, stood on the site of the present Manor Crescent. The surrounding area of the area, up until the early 1930’s, was covered in farmland. Between the 1930’s and 40’s the area was rapidly devel- oped as a large residential suburb of Kingston built at relatively low densities. The area has a very strong and distinctive street pattern with significant grass verges and a variety of interwar subur- ban detailing. Land Use Predominantly residential, MOL around the Hogsmill River and Alexandra Drive recreation ground. Local retail parades Movement Relatively minor suburban routes with Raeburn Avenue being the central north/south route through the Area. Berrylands Station at Chiltern Drive serves the northern part of the Area. Built form Long formal avenues lined with substantial grass verges of predominantly 1930’s semi detached housing, but also some bungalows and detached houses. Range of interwar detailing including Tudor details, pantiles, leaded light windows with a mixture of brick, pebbledash and rendered finishes. Some areas of distinct housing styles including art deco at the northern end of Grand Avenue.
  • Display PDF in Separate

    Display PDF in Separate

    N NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region H ogsrrrill Catchment L andscape Assessment -2 * ,,t HOGSMILL CATCHMENT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT Report prepared by WS Atkins Planning Consultants on behalf of National Rivers Authority Thames Region April 1994 NRA Landscape Architecture Group WS Atkins Planning Consultants National Rivers Authority Woodcote Grove, Ashley Road Thames Region Epsom, Surrey KT18 5BW Kings Meadow House, Kings Meadow Road Tel: (0372) 726140 Reading, Berkshire RG1 8DQ Fax: (0372) 740055 Tel: 0734 535000 Fax: 0734 500388 F2530/REP1/1 EN VIR O N M EN T A G E N C Y RCA/jeh : III III III 111 1 0 2 3 3 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to the following for giving information and help in compiling this report. National Rivers Authority - Thames Region Kevin Patrick Landscape Architect Dave Webb Conservation Officer Frances Bayley Conservation Officer (Surveys) Neil Dunlop Pollution Officer Dave Leeming Biologist Karen Hills Geomorphology David van Beeston Operations Manager Tributaries Surrey County Council John Edwards County Ecologist Local Authorities Jeff Grace Parks and Royal Borough of Andrew Watson Horticulture Section Kingston Upon Thames James Brebner Planning Department Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames John Biglin Countryside Development Borough of Officer Epsom and Ewell Other Organisations Nick Owen Project Officer Lower Mole Countryside Management Project Michael Waite London Ecology Unit CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose of study 1 Methodology 2 Structure of Report 3 2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE LANDSCAPE 5 Physical Influences 5 Human Influences 9 3. NATURE CONSERVATION VALUE 19 Wildlife habitats adjacent to the river 19 Biological survey of the river 21 River corridor survey 22 4.
  • Brochure 3870357.Pdf

    Brochure 3870357.Pdf

    LOCATION Contents LOCATION Introduction An invaluable insight into your new home This Location Information brochure offers an informed overview of 99 Greenfield Avenue as a potential new home, along with essential material about its surrounding area and its local community. It provides a valuable insight for any prospective owner or tenant. We wanted to provide you with information that you can absorb quickly, so we have presented it as visually as possible, making use of maps, icons, tables, graphs and charts. Overall, the brochure contains information about: The Property - including property details, floor plans, room details, photographs and Energy Performance Certificate. Transport - including locations of bus and coach stops, railway stations and ferry ports. Health - including locations, contact details and organisational information on the nearest GPs, pharmacies, hospitals and dentists. Local Policing - including locations, contact details and information about local community policing and the nearest police station, as well as police officers assigned to the area. Education - including locations of infant, primary and secondary schools and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for each key stage. Local Amenities - including locations of local services and facilities - everything from convenience stores to leisure centres, golf courses, theatres and DIY centres. Census - We have given a breakdown of the local community's age, employment and educational statistics. Hawes and Co 67 Victoria Road, KT6 4NR 020 8390 6565 [email protected]
  • Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Green Spaces Strategy 2008 - 2018

    Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Green Spaces Strategy 2008 - 2018

    Draft Green Spaces Strategy – For approval and adoption by Executive 11 March 2008 Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Green Spaces Strategy 2008 - 2018 Draft Green Spaces Strategy – For approval and adoption by Executive 11 March 2008 Introduction to the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Green Spaces Strategy 2008 - 2018 ..........................................................................................................................5 Section 1..............................................................................................................................6 1.1 Green Space Definition .......................................................................................... 6 1.2 What is a Green Spaces Strategy? ........................................................................ 7 1.3 Importance and development of the GSS............................................................... 7 Section 2..............................................................................................................................8 Legislative and Policy Context .......................................................................................... 8 2.1 National Policy and Strategies................................................................................ 8 2.2 Greater London Policy and Strategies.................................................................... 9 2.3 Mayor of London’s Biodiversity Strategy .............................................................. 10 2.4 Local Policy context.............................................................................................
  • Lbr 2008 Front Matter

    Lbr 2008 Front Matter

    London Natural History Society The Society publishes ornithological and other natural history records for the area within 20 miles of St Paul’s Cathedral. As well as Ornithology, other interests in natural history are catered for through the Society's Sections which record and study the major groups of flora and fauna, and the habitats in which they are found. Meetings organised by each Section are open to all members. New members, beginners and experts alike, are welcomed. An extensive programme of talks and field meetings, to which visitors are welcome, is provided throughout the year. As well as the annual London Bird Report, the Society publishes a journal, The London Naturalist, each year and its Newsletter and Bulletin of the London Bird Club every quarter. Members have access to a large lending and reference library of natural history books and can join one or more of several reading circles which circulate many natural history journals at a fraction of the cost of subscribing direct. Yearly subscriptions range from £20 (for ordinary membership) through £16 for senior members (over 65 years and who have been in continuous membership for ten years or more) to £5 for students (under 18 years of age, or receiving full-time education). Additional family members, who enjoy all the benefits of membership except separate publications, pay only £4 each. Cheques should be made payable to the London Natural History Society and sent to the Assistant Treasurer: Robin Blades, 32 Ashfield Road, London N14 7JY. Further copies of this issue of the London Bird Report may be obtained (price £8.00 plus £1.00 postage and packing in the UK) from: Catherine Schmitt, 4 Falkland Avenue, London, N3 1QR.