DOCSLIB.ORG

INTRODUCTION to PHILOSOPHY of SCIENCE X303 Time Line — 1200 BC - 150 AD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTRODUCTION to PHILOSOPHY of SCIENCE X303 Time Line — 1200 BC - 150 AD INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE X303 Time Line — 1200 BC - 150 AD 1200's BC — Fall of Troy 11-1200 BC 800's or 700's BC — Homer 700's BC — Hesiod ca. 624 - 545 BC — Thales b. ca. 612 — Sappho ca. 610 - 540 BC — Anaxamander ca. 580 - 500 BC — Anaxamines -1-600 BC ca. 570 - 495 BC — Pythagoras ca. 565 - 473 BC — Xenophanes ca. 550 - 480 BC —Heraclitus ca. 524 — 456 BC — Aeschylus ca. 528 - 462 — Themistocles ca. 515- after 450 BC — Parmenides ca. 500 - 428 BC — Anaxagoras ca. 496 - 406 BC — Sophocles -500 BC ca. 495 - after 450 BC — Zeno ca. 495 - 429 BC — Pericles ca. 490 BC — Persian Wars begin 492 — Battle of Marathon ca. 490 - 420 BC — Protagoras ca. 490 - after 420 BC — Gorgias ca. 485 - 406 BC — Euripides ca. 484 - 420 BC — Herodotus 400's BC — Antiphon 480 — Xerxes' invasion of Greece ca. 470's - ? — Leucippus b. ca. 460 - 457 BC — Democritus ca. 460 - 400 BC — Thucydides b. ca. 470 BC — Philolaus ca. 469 - 399 BC — Socrates b. ca. 460's BC — Hicetas of Syracuse —Ecphantus ca. 450 - 385 BC — Aristophanes 449 BC — Persian Wars end 431 BC — Peloponnesian War begins ca. 428 - 348 BC — Plato 404 BC — Pelopennesian War ends ca. 390 - 340 BC — Eudoxus of Cnidos 30 300's BC — Heraclides of Pontus -400 BC ca. 384 - 322 BC — Aristotle ca. 341 - 270 BC — Epicurus fl. ca. 330 BC — Callippus of Cyzicus fl. ca. 300 BC — Euclid fl. ca. 300 - 250 BC — Aristarchus of Samos -300 BC ca. 287 - 212 BC — Archimedes ca. 275 - 194 BC — Eratosthenes of Cyrene fl. 250 - 200 BC — Apollonius of Perge ca. 190 - 126 BC — Hipparchus ca. 50 - 120+ AD — Plutarch fl. 127-148 AD — Ptolemy -100 AD INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE X303 Time Line — 1500-1700 ca, 1450 — Gutenberg introduces his 1572 — New Star observed printing press with movable type 1576 —Thomas Digges' elementary 1492 — Discovery of America defense of Copernicus' system 1504 — Leonardo Mona Lisa published 1509-47 — Henry VIII reigns 1577 — Tycho Brahe observes comet 1510's — Erasmus fl. without measurable parallax 1512 — Copernicus circulates a rough 1578 —Du Bartas' anti Copernican outline of his theory (The poem,The Week, or the Creation of Commentariolus) the World, published 1513 —Machiavelli, The Prince 1580 — Tycho Brahe observes comet 1517 —Luther 95 Theses Against without measurable parallax Indulgences 1580 —Montaigne, Essays 1521 —Cortes, conquest of Mexico 1582 —Hakluyt, Divers Voyages 1522 —Titian, Bacchus and Ariadne 1584 —Gregorian Calendar, based on 1539 —Luther denounces Copernicus as Prutenic Tables, promulgated by an upstart and a fool, Gregory XIII quoting Joshua 10:13 as 1585 — Tycho Brahe observes comet evidence without measurable parallax 1540 —Rheticus publishes an account of 1588 — Spanish Armada Copernican theory in the ca. 1590 —Tycho Brahe publishes Narratio Prima Tychonic system in 1540 —Mercator — terrestrial globe Astronomae Instauratae 1543 —Death of Copernicus, and Progymnasmata publication of De Revolutionibus 1590 — Tycho Brahe observes comet Orbium Caelestium with the without measurable parallax preface of Osiander 1591 — Vieta, symbolic algebra 1543 —Vesalius publishes De humani 1593 — Tycho Brahe observes comet corporis fabrica without measurable parallax 1549 —Melanchthon (a lieutenant of 1594 —Thomas Blunderville's Luther), in his Initia Doctrinae elementary text on Astronomy Physicae, denounces Copernicans treats Copernicus' heliocentric as dishonest and indecent, citing theory as a useful fiction Ecclesiastes 1:4-5 and other 1596— Kepler publishes Biblical passages as evidence Cosmographical Mystery 1550 —Michelangelo, St Peter's — Tycho Brahe observes comet 1550's—John Calvin, in his Commentary without measurable parallax on Genesis, rejects Copernican 1597 —Jean Bodin's Universae Naturae views on the basis of the 93rd Theatrum published Psalm 1600 —Gilbert publishes De Magnete 1551 —Erasmus Reinhold's Prutenic —Giordano Bruno burned at the Tables published stake in Rome 1553 —Miguel Serveto burnt at stake by —Tycho Brahe dies John Calvin and elders in Geneva —Kepler appropriates his data for publishing Christianismi fromTycho's heirs Restitutio —New star observed 1558-1603 —Queen Elizabeth I reigns 1603 —Shakespeare, Hamlet 1563 —Council of Trent 1604—Galileo sets out his law of 1637 —Descartes, publication on analytic falling bodies in a letter to geometry in the Discours Paolo Sarpi 1638—Galileo publishes Discourses on the —New star observed Two New Sciences 1605—Francis Bacon, The Advancement 1642—Rembrandt, Night Watch of Learning 1643-1715 — Louis XIV reigns — Cervantes, Don Quixote 1644—Descartes publishes Principles of 1607—Jamestown settled Philosophy 1609—Kepler publishes Astronomia 1648 —Cromwell, Puritan revolution Nova 1651—Thomas Hobbes publishes Leviathan —Galileo makes telescopic 1657—Accademia del Cimento founded in observation of the heavens Florence 1610—Galileo publishes The Sidereal 1661—Boyle, Sceptical Chymist Messenger 1662—Royal Society founded 1611—John Donne's "Ignatius, his —Pascal, Pensées Conclave" published 1666—Molière, Le Misanthrope —King James Bible 1667—John Milton publishes Paradise 1615—Ciampoli's and Dini's letters to Lost Galileo 1673—Huygens publishes on the —Bellarmine's letter to Foscarini pendulum 1616—General Congregation of the 1674—Hooke publishes An attempt to Index puts De Revolutionibus and Prove the Motion of the Earth from all other writings in which the Observations earth's motion is affirmed on the 1678—Huygens, Treatise on Light Index. 1680's -90's —Newton and Leibniz — Galileo admonished to abandon discover the calculus Copernican views 1687 —Newton publishes the Principia 1618—Thirty Years' War begins 1689 —English Bill of Rights 1619—Kepler publishes De Harmonice —Pùrcell, Dido and Aeneas Mundi 1690 —John Locke, On Human 1620 —Francis Bacon, Novum Organum Understanding 1623 —Galileo publishes Il Saggiatore 1692—Salem witch trials 1627 —Kepler publishes Rudolphine 1699—French Académie des Tables sciences founded 1628—Harvey, publishes on the 1704—Newton publishes the Optics circulation of the blood 1632—Galileo publishes Dialogue on the Two Chief Systems of the World 1633—Galileo sentenced by the Inquisition. He abjures in June .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece
    Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ancient Greek Philosophy but didn’t Know Who to Ask Edited by Patricia F. O’Grady MEET THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ANCIENT GREECE Dedicated to the memory of Panagiotis, a humble man, who found pleasure when reading about the philosophers of Ancient Greece Meet the Philosophers of Ancient Greece Everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask Edited by PATRICIA F. O’GRADY Flinders University of South Australia © Patricia F. O’Grady 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Patricia F. O’Grady has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identi.ed as the editor of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East Suite 420 Union Road 101 Cherry Street Farnham Burlington Surrey, GU9 7PT VT 05401-4405 England USA Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask 1. Philosophy, Ancient 2. Philosophers – Greece 3. Greece – Intellectual life – To 146 B.C. I. O’Grady, Patricia F. 180 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about ancient Greek philosophy but didn’t know who to ask / Patricia F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persian-Toledan Astronomical Connection and the European Renaissance
    Academia Europaea 19th Annual Conference in cooperation with: Sociedad Estatal de Conmemoraciones Culturales, Ministerio de Cultura (Spain) “The Dialogue of Three Cultures and our European Heritage” (Toledo Crucible of the Culture and the Dawn of the Renaissance) 2 - 5 September 2007, Toledo, Spain Chair, Organizing Committee: Prof. Manuel G. Velarde The Persian-Toledan Astronomical Connection and the European Renaissance M. Heydari-Malayeri Paris Observatory Summary This paper aims at presenting a brief overview of astronomical exchanges between the Eastern and Western parts of the Islamic world from the 8th to 14th century. These cultural interactions were in fact vaster involving Persian, Indian, Greek, and Chinese traditions. I will particularly focus on some interesting relations between the Persian astronomical heritage and the Andalusian (Spanish) achievements in that period. After a brief introduction dealing mainly with a couple of terminological remarks, I will present a glimpse of the historical context in which Muslim science developed. In Section 3, the origins of Muslim astronomy will be briefly examined. Section 4 will be concerned with Khwârizmi, the Persian astronomer/mathematician who wrote the first major astronomical work in the Muslim world. His influence on later Andalusian astronomy will be looked into in Section 5. Andalusian astronomy flourished in the 11th century, as will be studied in Section 6. Among its major achievements were the Toledan Tables and the Alfonsine Tables, which will be presented in Section 7. The Tables had a major position in European astronomy until the advent of Copernicus in the 16th century. Since Ptolemy’s models were not satisfactory, Muslim astronomers tried to improve them, as we will see in Section 8.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology - Malcolm Longair
    ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS - A History of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology - Malcolm Longair A HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Malcolm Longair Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE Keywords: History, Astronomy, Astrophysics, Cosmology, Telescopes, Astronomical Technology, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Ancient Astronomy, Copernican Revolution, Stars and Stellar Evolution, Interstellar Medium, Galaxies, Clusters of Galaxies, Large- scale Structure of the Universe, Active Galaxies, General Relativity, Black Holes, Classical Cosmology, Cosmological Models, Cosmological Evolution, Origin of Galaxies, Very Early Universe Contents 1. Introduction 2. Prehistoric, Ancient and Mediaeval Astronomy up to the Time of Copernicus 3. The Copernican, Galilean and Newtonian Revolutions 4. From Astronomy to Astrophysics – the Development of Astronomical Techniques in the 19th Century 5. The Classification of the Stars – the Harvard Spectral Sequence 6. Stellar Structure and Evolution to 1939 7. The Galaxy and the Nature of the Spiral Nebulae 8. The Origins of Astrophysical Cosmology – Einstein, Friedman, Hubble, Lemaître, Eddington 9. The Opening Up of the Electromagnetic Spectrum and the New Astronomies 10. Stellar Evolution after 1945 11. The Interstellar Medium 12. Galaxies, Clusters Of Galaxies and the Large Scale Structure of the Universe 13. Active Galaxies, General Relativity and Black Holes 14. Classical Cosmology since 1945 15. The Evolution of Galaxies and Active Galaxies with Cosmic Epoch 16. The Origin of Galaxies and the Large-Scale Structure of The Universe 17. The VeryUNESCO Early Universe – EOLSS Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical SketchSAMPLE CHAPTERS Summary This chapter describes the history of the development of astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology from the earliest times to the first decade of the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus and Tycho Brahe
    THE NEWTONIAN REVOLUTION – Part One Philosophy 167: Science Before Newton’s Principia Class 2 16th Century Astronomy: Copernicus and Tycho Brahe September 9, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Copernican Revolution .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Ptolemaic Astronomy: e.g. Longitudes of Mars ................................................................... 1 B. A Problem Raised for Philosophy of Science ....................................................................... 2 C. Background: 13 Centuries of Ptolemaic Astronomy ............................................................. 4 D. 15th Century Planetary Astronomy: Regiomantanus ............................................................. 5 E. Nicolaus Copernicus: A Brief Biography .............................................................................. 6 F. Copernicus and Ibn al-Shāţir (d. 1375) ……………………………………………………. 7 G. The Many Different Copernican Revolutions ........................................................................ 9 H. Some Comments on Kuhn’s View of Science ……………………………………………... 10 II. De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelstium (1543) ..................................................................................... 11 A. From Basic Ptolemaic to Basic Copernican ........................................................................... 11 B. A New Result: Relative Orbital Radii ................................................................................... 12 C. Orbital
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Gresham, Copernican Cosmology, and Planetary
    JHA0010.1177/0021828618790302Journal for the History of AstronomyWłodarczyk et al. 790302research-article2018 Article JHA Journal for the History of Astronomy 2018, Vol. 49(3) 269 –305 Edward Gresham, Copernican © The Author(s) 2018 Article reuse guidelines: Cosmology, and Planetary sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/0021828618790302DOI: 10.1177/0021828618790302 Occultations in Pre-Telescopic journals.sagepub.com/home/jha Astronomy Jarosław Włodarczyk Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Richard L. Kremer Department of History, Dartmouth College, USA Howard C. Hughes Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, USA Abstract This article introduces an understudied source in the history of astronomy, the Astrostereon or the Discourse of the Falling of the Planet (1603). Written by the English astrologer Edward Gresham, this text presents, among other things, the earliest known set of predicted planetary occultations (for 1603–1604) and the use of these phenomena to defend the Copernican cosmology. We analyse those predictions and then briefly survey all known pre-telescopic observations of reported planetary occulations and the motivations for such observations. These data suggest that for early observers, the greater the difference in apparent brightness between the two occulting bodies, the greater the angular separation could be for an occultation nonetheless to be reported. An appendix seeks to explain this finding by considering several factors known from modern experimental analyses of human visual performance. Keywords Planetary occultations, Edward Gresham, Astrostereon, Copernican cosmology, pre-telescopic observation, human visual performance Corresponding author: Jarosław Włodarczyk, Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, 00- 330 Warsaw, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus and His Revolutions
    Copernicus and his Revolutions Produced for the Cosmology and Cultures Project of the OBU Planetarium by Kerry Magruder August, 2005 2 Credits Written & Produced by: Kerry Magruder Narrator: Candace Magruder Copernicus: Kerry Magruder Cardinal Schönberg: Phil Kemp Andreas Osiander: J Harvey C. S. Lewis: Phil Kemp Johann Kepler: J Harvey Book Images courtesy: History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries Photographs and travel slides courtesy: Duane H.D. Roller Archive, History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries Digital photography by: Hannah Magruder Soundtrack composed and produced by: Eric Barfield Special thanks to... Peter Barker, Bernie Goldstein, Katherine Tredwell, Dennis Danielson, Mike Keas, JoAnn Palmeri, Hannah Magruder, Rachel Magruder, Susanna Magruder, Candace Magruder Produced with a grant from the American Council of Learned Societies 3 1. Contents 1. Contents________________________________________________3 2. Introduction _____________________________________________4 A. Summary ____________________________________________4 B. Synopsis ____________________________________________5 C. Instructor Notes_______________________________________7 3. Before the Show _________________________________________9 A. Vocabulary and Definitions _____________________________9 B. Pre-Test ____________________________________________10 4. Production Script________________________________________11 A. Production Notes_____________________________________11 B. Theater Preparation___________________________________13
    [Show full text]
  • Theme 4: from the Greeks to the Renaissance: the Earth in Space
    Theme 4: From the Greeks to the Renaissance: the Earth in Space 4.1 Greek Astronomy Unlike the Babylonian astronomers, who developed algorithms to fit the astronomical data they recorded but made no attempt to construct a real model of the solar system, the Greeks were inveterate model builders. Some of their models—for example, the Pythagorean idea that the Earth orbits a celestial fire, which is not, as might be expected, the Sun, but instead is some metaphysical body concealed from us by a dark “counter-Earth” which always lies between us and the fire—were neither clearly motivated nor obviously testable. However, others were more recognisably “scientific” in the modern sense: they were motivated by the desire to describe observed phenomena, and were discarded or modified when they failed to provide good descriptions. In this sense, Greek astronomy marks the birth of astronomy as a true scientific discipline. The challenges to any potential model of the movement of the Sun, Moon and planets are as follows: • Neither the Sun nor the Moon moves across the night sky with uniform angular velocity. The Babylonians recognised this, and allowed for the variation in their mathematical des- criptions of these quantities. The Greeks wanted a physical picture which would account for the variation. • The seasons are not of uniform length. The Greeks defined the seasons in the standard astronomical sense, delimited by equinoxes and solstices, and realised quite early (Euctemon, around 430 BC) that these were not all the same length. This is, of course, related to the non-uniform motion of the Sun mentioned above.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Copernicanism on Judicial Astrology at the English Court, 1543-1660 ______
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 1-2011 'In So Many Ways Do the Planets Bear Witness': The mpI act of Copernicanism on Judicial Astrology at the English Court, 1543-1660 Justin Dohoney Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Dohoney, Justin, "'In So Many Ways Do the Planets Bear Witness': The mpI act of Copernicanism on Judicial Astrology at the English Court, 1543-1660" (2011). All Theses. 1143. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "IN SO MANY WAYS DO THE PLANETS BEAR WITNESS": THE IMPACT OF COPERNICANISM ON JUDICIAL ASTROLOGY AT THE ENGLISH COURT, 1543-1660 _____________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts History _______________________________________________________ by Justin Robert Dohoney August 2011 _______________________________________________________ Accepted by: Pamela Mack, Committee Chair Alan Grubb Megan Taylor-Shockley Caroline Dunn ABSTRACT The traditional historiography of science from the late-nineteenth through the mid-twentieth centuries has broadly claimed that the Copernican revolution in astronomy irrevocably damaged the practice of judicial astrology. However, evidence to the contrary suggests that judicial astrology not only continued but actually expanded during the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. During this time period, judicial astrologers accomplished this by appropriating contemporary science and mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 David Gans on the Gregorian Reform, Modern Astronomy, and The
    1 David Gans on the Gregorian reform, modern astronomy, and the Jewish calendar If we are to identify a uniting thread, or a common denominator, between in David Gans’ diverse works, – history on the one hand, and astronomy on the other – this must be an interest in the measurement of time. David Gans (1541-1613) was a leading Jewish historiographer and astronomer of the early modern period. Born in Lippstadt, he received a rabbinic education in Cracow under R. Moses Isserles, and in Prague, where he spent most of his life, under R. Loew b. Betzalel (the Maharal); but he also immersed himself in the study of history, mathematics, and astronomy. Both his major works, Tsemaḥ David (a Jewish and world chronography) and Neḥmad ve-Naim (a handbook of astronomy), assume in very different ways a range of notions about chronology, calendars, and the flow of time. Gans also wrote a specific treatise on the Jewish calendar, entitled Maor ha-Qaton (‘the smaller luminary’, i.e. the moon – Gen. 1:16); but unfortunately this work is lost. Nevertheless, a sufficient number of references are made to calendar and chronology in the works that are extant to convey his views on the Jewish calendar and, in particular, the Jewish calendar’s significance for the study of astronomy and its relationship with its Christian counterpart.1 By the late 16th century, when Gans was writing, there existed a rich tradition of scholarship on the Jewish calendar for him to draw on. The early 12th century had witnessed an eruption of monographic writing on the Jewish calendar, with books later to be known under the standard title ‘Sefer ha-Ibbur’ (‘Book of the intercalation’ or ‘calendar’), authored by Abraham b.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Datastream
    A Dividing Sea The Adriatic World from the Fourth to the First Centuries BC By Keith Robert Fairbank, Jr. B.A. Brigham Young University, 2010 M.A. Brigham Young University, 2012 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in Ancient History at Brown University PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MAY 2018 © Copyright 2018 by Keith R. Fairbank, Jr. This dissertation by Keith R. Fairbank, Jr. is accepted in its present form by the Program in Ancient History as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date _______________ ____________________________________ Graham Oliver, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date _______________ ____________________________________ Peter van Dommelen, Reader Date _______________ ____________________________________ Lisa Mignone, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date _______________ ____________________________________ Andrew G. Campbell, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Keith Robert Fairbank, Jr. hails from the great states of New York and Montana. He grew up feeding cattle under the Big Sky, serving as senior class president and continuing on to Brigham Young University in Utah for his BA in Humanities and Classics (2010). Keith worked as a volunteer missionary for two years in Brazil, where he learned Portuguese (2004–2006). Keith furthered his education at Brigham Young University, earning an MA in Classics (2012). While there he developed a curriculum for accelerated first year Latin focused on competency- based learning. He matriculated at Brown University in fall 2012 in the Program in Ancient History. While at Brown, Keith published an appendix in The Landmark Caesar. He also co- directed a Mellon Graduate Student Workshop on colonial entanglements.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition Open Sources Sources 11
    Edition Open Sources Sources 11 Pietro Daniel Omodeo and Jürgen Renn: Astronomy In: Pietro Daniel Omodeo and Jürgen Renn (ed.): Science in Court Society : Giovan Bat- tista Benedetti’s Diversarum speculationum mathematicarum et physicarum liber (Turin, 1585) Online version at http://edition-open-sources.org/sources/11/ ISBN 978-3-945561-16-4 First published 2019 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Printed and distributed by: PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin http://www.book-on-demand.de/node/25750 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; de- tailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 6 Astronomy 6.1 Benedetti as an Astronomer Benedetti’s astronomical considerations are not systematic. They are scattered throughout the volume in different sections. In spite of the difficulty of ordering them and obtaining an overview, they were very much appreciated among his contemporaries. Apart from Kepler’s eulogy of Benedetti’s ingenuity, the broad European success of the astronomical parts of this work is documented in other references. A few years after the publication of the Diversae spaeculationes, Brahe must have had a copy of it in Denmark, as he quoted it extensively and accurately on two occasions. In his correspondence with Landgrave William IV and the Hesse-Kassel court mathematician Christopher Rothmann, he referred to Benedetti’s observation of the light of Venus reflected on the part of the lunar disc not presently enlightened by the sun: In fact, I sometimes saw that Venus illuminated in a rather sensible manner that part of the Moon that was most distant and opposed to the Sun, although the Moon is by far more distant from Venus’s circuit than the comet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Short History of Science
    PHYSICS FOUNDATIONS SOCIETY THE FINNISH SOCIETY FOR NATURAL PHILOSOPHY PHYSICS FOUNDATIONS SOCIETY THE FINNISH SOCIETY FOR www.physicsfoundations.org NATURAL PHILOSOPHY www.lfs.fi Dr. Suntola’s “The Short History of Science” shows fascinating competence in its constructively critical in-depth exploration of the long path that the pioneers of metaphysics and empirical science have followed in building up our present understanding of physical reality. The book is made unique by the author’s perspective. He reflects the historical path to his Dynamic Universe theory that opens an unparalleled perspective to a deeper understanding of the harmony in nature – to click the pieces of the puzzle into their places. The book opens a unique possibility for the reader to make his own evaluation of the postulates behind our present understanding of reality. – Tarja Kallio-Tamminen, PhD, theoretical philosophy, MSc, high energy physics The book gives an exceptionally interesting perspective on the history of science and the development paths that have led to our scientific picture of physical reality. As a philosophical question, the reader may conclude how much the development has been directed by coincidences, and whether the picture of reality would have been different if another path had been chosen. – Heikki Sipilä, PhD, nuclear physics Would other routes have been chosen, if all modern experiments had been available to the early scientists? This is an excellent book for a guided scientific tour challenging the reader to an in-depth consideration of the choices made. – Ari Lehto, PhD, physics Tuomo Suntola, PhD in Electron Physics at Helsinki University of Technology (1971).
    [Show full text]