DOCSLIB.ORG

Niqb 119 Wea9393 in the High Court of Justice In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Niqb 119 Wea9393 in the High Court of Justice In Neutral Citation No. [2014] NIQB 119 Ref: WEA9393 Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down Delivered: 13/10/2014 (subject to editorial corrections)* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND IN THE DIVISIONAL COURT ________ QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION (JUDICIAL REVIEW) ________ Wood’s (David) Application [2014] NIQB 119 AN APPLICATION BY DAVID WOOD FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ________ Morgan LCJ, Girvan LJ and Weatherup J WEATHERUP J (delivering the judgment of the Court) [1] The applicant applies for judicial review of a decision of a constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland made on 24 March 2014 requiring the applicant, who has been charged with drugs offences, to provide a non-intimate sample for evidential purposes. Mr Sayers appeared for the applicant and Mr Coll for the Police Service of Northern Ireland, the respondent. [2] The applicant was arrested on 13 May 2013 on suspicion of possession of drugs. On the same date the applicant was charged with cultivating cannabis, possessing a Class B controlled drug with intent to supply and possession of a Class B controlled drug. He appeared before Omagh Magistrates’ Court on 14 May 2013 and was remanded in custody. Bail was granted on 4 December 2013. No evidential DNA sample was taken from the applicant in the course of the investigation. [3] Police Constable Prime was appointed investigating officer on 23 October 2013. On 18 November 2013, while the applicant was on remand in custody at HMP Maghaberry, PC Prime, through Prison Liaison, requested that the applicant provide a casework DNA sample. The applicant refused that request on 5 December 2013. 1 [4] On 24 March 2014, further to the direction of the Public Prosecution Service, PC Prime made a request through the applicant’s solicitors for the applicant to provide a non-intimate sample for evidential purposes. This request, which is the subject matter of this application for judicial review, was refused by the applicant. [5] The relevant legislative provisions are contained in articles 63 and 63A of the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 as amended. The current form of the legislation provides as follows (with provisions of particular note for present purposes in italics): “Other samples 63. - (1) Except as provided by this Article, a non-intimate sample may not be taken from a person without the appropriate consent. (2) Consent to the taking of a non-intimate sample must be given in writing. (2A) A non-intimate sample may be taken from a person without the appropriate consent if- (a) he is in police detention in consequence of his arrest for a recordable offence; and (b) either he has not had a non-intimate sample of the same type and from the same part of the body taken in the course of the investigation of the offence by the police, or he has had such a sample taken but it proved insufficient. (3) A non-intimate sample may be taken from a person without the appropriate consent if- (a) he is being held in custody by the police on the authority of a court; and (b) an officer of at least the rank of inspector authorises it to be taken without the appropriate consent. (3A) A non-intimate sample may be taken from a person (whether or not he is in police detention or held in custody by the police on the authority of a court) without the appropriate consent if- 2 (a) he has been charged with a recordable offence or informed that he will be reported for such an offence; and (b) either he has not had a non-intimate sample taken from him in the course of the investigation of the offence by the police or he has had a non-intimate sample taken from him but either it was not suitable for the same means of analysis or, though so suitable, the sample proved insufficient. (3B) A non-intimate sample may be taken from a person without the appropriate consent if he has been convicted of a recordable offence. (4) An officer may only give an authorisation under paragraph (3) if he has reasonable grounds – (a) for suspecting the involvement of the person from whom the sample is to be taken in a recordable offence; and (b) for believing that the sample will tend to confirm or disprove his involvement. (5) An officer may give an authorisation under paragraph (3) orally or in writing but, if he gives it orally, he shall confirm it in writing as soon as is practicable. (5A) An officer shall not give an authorisation under paragraph (3) for the taking from any person of a non- intimate sample consisting of a skin impression if— (a) a skin impression of the same part of the body has already been taken from that person in the course of the investigation of the offence; and (b) the impression previously taken is not one that has proved insufficient. (6) Where- (a) an authorisation has been given; and (b) it is proposed that a non-intimate sample shall be taken in pursuance of the authorisation, 3 an officer shall inform the person from whom the sample is to be taken – (i) of the giving of the authorisation; and (ii) of the grounds for giving it. (7) The duty imposed by paragraph (6)(ii) includes a duty to state the nature of the offence in which it is suspected that the person from whom the sample is to be taken has been involved. (8) If a non-intimate sample is taken from a person by virtue of paragraph (3)- (a) the authorisation by virtue of which it was taken; and (b) the grounds for giving the authorisation, shall be recorded as soon as is practicable after the sample is taken. (8A) In a case where by virtue of paragraph (2A), (3A) or (3B) a sample is taken from a person without the appropriate consent- (a) he shall be told the reason before the sample is taken; and (b) the reason shall be recorded as soon as practicable after the sample is taken. (8B) If a non-intimate sample is taken from a person at a police station, whether with or without the appropriate consent- (a) before the sample is taken, an officer shall inform him that it may be the subject of a speculative search; and (b) the fact that the person has been informed of this possibility shall be recorded as soon as practicable after the sample has been taken. 4 (9) If a non-intimate sample is taken from a person detained at a police station, the matters required to be recorded by paragraph (8), (8A) or (8B) shall be recorded in his custody record. (9A) The power to take a non-intimate sample from a person without the appropriate consent is exercisable by a constable. (10) Paragraph (3B) shall not apply to persons convicted before the date on which that paragraph comes into operation. (10A) Where a non-intimate sample consisting of a skin impression is taken electronically from a person, it must be taken only in such manner, and using such devices, as the Secretary of State has approved for the purpose of the electronic taking of such an impression. (11) Nothing in this Article applies to a person arrested or detained under the terrorism provisions. (12) Nothing in this Article applies to a person arrested under an extradition arrest power. Fingerprints and samples : supplementary provisions 63A.- (1) Where a person has been arrested on suspicion of being involved in a recordable offence or has been charged with such an offence or has been informed that he will be reported for such an offence, fingerprints, impressions of footwear or samples or the information derived from samples taken under any power conferred by this Part from the person may be checked against - (a) other fingerprints, impressions of footwear or samples to which the person seeking to check has access and which are held by or on behalf of any one or more relevant law-enforcement authorities or which are held in connection with or as a result of an investigation of an offence; (b) information derived from other samples if the information is contained in records to which the 5 person seeking to check has access and which are held as mentioned in sub-paragraph (a). (1ZA) Fingerprints taken by virtue of Article 61(6A) may be checked against other fingerprints to which the person seeking to check has access and which are held by or on behalf of any one or more relevant law-enforcement authorities or which are held in connection with or as a result of an investigation of an offence. (1A) In paragraphs (1) and (1ZA) “relevant law- enforcement authority” means — (a) a police force; (b) the [National Crime Agency]; (c) a public authority (not falling within sub- paragraph (a) or (b)) with functions in any part of the British Islands which consist of or include the investigation of crimes or the charging of offenders; (d) any person with functions in any country or territory outside the United Kingdom which – (i) correspond to those of a police force; or (ii) otherwise consist of or include the investigation of conduct contrary to the law of that country or territory, or the apprehension of persons guilty of such conduct; (e) any person with functions under any international agreement which consist of or include the investigation of conduct which is - (i) unlawful under the law of one or more places; (ii) prohibited by such an agreement; or (iii) contrary to international law; 6 or the apprehension of persons guilty of such conduct.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Royal Navy Police
    Royal Navy Police An inspection of the leadership of the Royal Navy Police in relation to its investigations July 2016 © HMIC 2016 ISBN: 978-1-78655-157-3 www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmic Contents Summary .................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 2. How effective is the overall strategic leadership and direction of the RNP, including the structures and mechanisms in support of these areas? .............. 10 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 10 Findings ................................................................................................................ 10 3. How effective are the oversight, governance, monitoring and assessment arrangements within the RNP to ensure investigations are effective and kept free from improper interference? ........................................................................... 24 What we were looking for ..................................................................................... 24 Findings ................................................................................................................ 25 4. How well does the RNP use the National Intelligence Model in identifying strategic policing priorities that influence strategic planning and resourcing? 31 What we were looking for ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secretariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Clare Ovey Tel: 03 88 41 36 45 Date: 21/03/2016 DH-DD(2016)316 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1259 meeting (7-9 June 2016) (DH) Item reference: Updated action plan (04/03/2016) Communication from the United Kingdom concerning the case of Al Skeini against the United Kingdom (Application No. 55721/07) * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1259 réunion (7-9 juin 2016) (DH) Référence du point : Plan d’action mis à jour Communication du Royaume-Uni concernant l’affaire Al Skeini contre Royaume-Uni (Requête n° 55721/07) (anglais uniquement) Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights ACTION PLAN AL SKEINI AND OTHERS V THE UNITED KINGDOM Application number 55721/07 Judgment final on 07/07/2011 Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 04/03/2016 CASE SUMMARY The case involved six applicants whose relatives were killed in the course of operations conducted by UK Armed Forces in Basra, South East Iraq in the latter part of 2003, when the UK and US were occupying powers after major warfighting had been declared to be complete. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found that all six deaths fell within the jurisdiction of the UK under Article 1 of the Convention because of the exceptional circumstances deriving from the UK’s assumption of authority and responsibility for security in South East Iraq, as an occupying power from 1 May 2003 to 28 June 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 08 September 2021
    Changes to legislation: Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 08 September 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 2001 CHAPTER 16 An Act to make provision for combatting crime and disorder; to make provision about the disclosure of information relating to criminal matters and about powers of search and seizure; to amend the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 and the Terrorism Act 2000; to make provision about the police, the National Criminal Intelligence Service and the National Crime Squad; to make provision about the powers of the courts in relation to criminal matters; and for connected purposes. [11th May 2001] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 PROVISIONS FOR COMBATTING CRIME AND DISORDER CHAPTER 1 ON THE SPOT PENALTIES FOR DISORDERLY BEHAVIOUR Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Pt. 1 Ch. 1 extended (15.11.2003) by Police Reform Act 2002 (c. 30), ss. 38, 108, Sch. 4 para. 1(2)(a); S.I. 2003/2593, art. 2(d) C2 Pt. 1 Ch. 1 modified (26.12.2004) by The Penalties for Disorderly Behaviour (Amendment of Minimum Age) Order 2004 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Regime Under Wireless Telegraphy Licences Granted to Airwave Mmo2 Limited
    Consultation on the Airwave 'sharers list' regime under wireless Consultation on the Airwave 'sharers list' regime under wireless telegraphy licences granted to Airwave mmO2 Limited Consultation Publication date: 08 April 2004 Closing Date for Responses: 13 May 2004 Consultation on the Airwave 'sharers list' regime under wireless telegraphy licences granted to Airwave mmO2 Limited 1 Consultation on the Airwave 'sharers list' regime under wireless telegraphy licences granted to Airwave mmO2 Limited Contents Section Page The consultation 3 Executive summary 5 1 Background to the sharers list 6 2 What does it mean to be included on the sharers list 7 3 DTI criteria for amending the sharers list 8 4 Continuation of the sharers list regime 9 Annex Page 1 Ofcom’s consultation principles 10 2 Consultation response cover sheet 11 3 Consultation questions 13 4 The List of Sharers (Updated May 2003) 14 5 The questions which were used by the DTI to assess applicants to join the sharers list: 20 2 Consultation on the Airwave 'sharers list' regime under wireless telegraphy licences granted to Airwave mmO2 Limited Section 1 The consultation 1. Given that the sharers list regime will continue by virtue of terms in O2’s Airwave wireless telegraphy licences and that Ofcom will carry out the procedure for updating the sharers list do stakeholders agree that • the procedures and criteria which Ofcom will apply when considering future applications for inclusion on the sharers list, ought to be as set out in paragraph 3.4 and Annex 5; and that • the timing and frequency of future consultations about further changes to the sharers list, ought to be as set out in paragraph 4.7? How to respond 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 06 August 2017
    Changes to legislation: The Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 06 August 2017. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 288 (N.I. 2) NORTHERN IRELAND The Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 Made - - - - 7th February 2007 Coming into operation in accordance with Article 1(2) to (4) At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 7th day of February 2007 Present, The Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in Council Whereas a draft of this Order in Council has been approved by resolution of each House of Parliament: Now, therefore, Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred by paragraph 1(1) of the Schedule to the Northern Ireland Act 2000 (c. 1) and of all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows:– PART I INTRODUCTORY Title and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007. (2) Except as provided by paragraph (3), this Order comes into operation on 1st March 2007. (3) Articles 18 and 25(2) come into operation on such day as the Secretary of State may by order appoint. (4) An order under paragraph (3) may contain such transitional or saving provisions as the Secretary of State thinks appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • National Intelligence Model
    This PDF file contains interactive links that help you to navigate the document quickly, and to enable you to gain immediate access to all websites listed. Clicking on any of the items in the main list of Contents (screen pages 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) will take you directly to the page listed. Or click on any item in the list of Contents at the start of each Section. You may also access full Checklist details by clicking on the top of any Checklist box. To return to the list of Contents, simply click on the line “NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED…” at the foot of each page. Where you see a website address featured in purple, click on it to make a direct link. GUIDANCE ON THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL 2005 Produced on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers by the National Centre for Policing Excellence GUIDANCE ON THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL This document has been produced by the National Centre for Policing Excellence (NCPE) on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). The NCPE was established by the Police Reform Act 2002. As part of its remit the NCPE is required to develop policing doctrine, including guidance, in consultation with ACPO, the Home Office and the Police Service. Guidance produced by the NCPE should be used by chief officers to shape police responses to ensure consistent levels of service. The implementation of all guidance will require operational choices to be made at a local level in order to achieve the appropriate police response. This guidance underpins the NIM Code of Practice which is the statutory code for all police forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Police Act 1997 (Criminal Records) (Scotland) Regulations 2006
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2006 No. 96 The Police Act 1997 (Criminal Records) (Scotland) Regulations 2006 Citation, commencement and extent 2.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Police Act 1997 (Criminal Records) (Scotland) Regulations 2006 and shall come into force on 1st April 2006. (2) These Regulations extend to Scotland and, in so far as regulations 7 to 12, 16 and 17 extend beyond Scotland, they do so only as a matter of Scots law. Interpretation 2. In these Regulations– (a) any reference to a numbered section or part is to the section or part bearing that number in the Police Act 1997; (b) any reference to a numbered regulation is to the regulation bearing that number in these Regulations; (c) any reference in a regulation to a numbered paragraph is to the paragraph bearing that number in that regulation; and (d) any words or expressions used in these Regulations to which meanings are assigned by Part 5 of the Police Act 1997 shall have the same meanings as in that Part of that Act. Application form 3. The form set out in Schedule 2 to these Regulations, or a form to the like effect, is the prescribed form for the purposes of an application under sections 112 (criminal conviction certificates)(1), 113A (criminal record certificates)(2), 113B (enhanced criminal record certificates)(3), 114 (criminal record certificates: Crown employment)(4) and 116 (enhanced criminal record certificates: judicial appointments and Crown employment)(5).
    [Show full text]
  • Duty of Care
    House of Commons Defence Committee Duty of Care Third Report of Session 2004–05 Volume I HC 63-I House of Commons Defence Committee Duty of Care Third Report of Session 2004–05 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 3 March 2005 HC 63-I [Incorporating HC 620 i-vii, Session 2003–04] Published on 14 March 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current Membership Mr Bruce George MP (Labour, Walsall South) (Chairman) Mr James Cran MP (Conservative, Beverley and Holderness) Mr David Crausby MP (Labour, Bolton North East) Mike Gapes MP (Labour, Ilford South) Mr Mike Hancock CBE MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, North Durham) Richard Ottaway MP (Conservative, Croydon South) Mr Frank Roy MP (Labour, Motherwell and Wishaw) Rachel Squire MP (Labour, Dunfermline West) Mr Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport) The following Member was also a Member of the Committee during the period covered by this report. Mr Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill
    Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Home Office, are published separately as Bill 5—EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Mr Secretary Blunkett has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998: In my view the provisions of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill are compatible with the Convention rights. Bill 5 53/4 Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill CONTENTS PART 1 THE SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY CHAPTER 1 SOCA: ESTABLISHMENT AND ACTIVITIES Establishment of SOCA 1 Establishment of Serious Organised Crime Agency Functions 2 Functions of SOCA as to serious organised crime 3 Functions of SOCA as to information relating to crime 4 Exercise of functions: general considerations General powers 5 SOCA’s general powers Annual plans and reports 6Annual plans 7 Annual reports Central supervision and direction 8 General duty of Secretary of State and Scottish Ministers 9 Strategic priorities 10 Performance targets 11 Codes of practice 12 Reports to Secretary of State 13 Power to direct submission of action plan 14 Revision of inadequate action plan 15 Procedure for giving directions under section 13 16 Reports relating to directions under section 13 17 Inspections Bill 5 53/4 iv Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill Financial provisions 18 Grants by Secretary of State 19 Determinations relating to grants under section 18 20 Charges by SOCA and other receipts 21 Accounts Operational matters 22 Operational responsibility of Director General 23 Activities in Scotland in relation to crime 24 Mutual assistance between SOCA and law enforcement agencies: voluntary arrangements 25 Mutual assistance between SOCA and law enforcement agencies: directed arrangements 26 Use by SOCA of police premises etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Armed Forces Bill
    Armed Forces Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Ministry of Defence, will be published separately as Bill 94—EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Secretary John Reid has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998: In my view the provisions of the Armed Forces Bill are compatible with the Convention rights. Bill 94 54/1 Armed Forces Bill CONTENTS FIRST GROUP OF PARTS DISCIPLINE PART 1 OFFENCES Assisting an enemy, misconduct on operations etc 1 Assisting an enemy 2 Misconduct on operations 3 Obstructing operations 4 Looting 5 Failure to escape etc Mutiny 6Mutiny 7 Failure to suppress mutiny Desertion and absence without leave 8 Desertion 9 Absence without leave 10 Failure to cause apprehension of deserters or absentees Insubordination etc 11 Misconduct towards a superior officer 12 Disobedience to lawful commands 13 Contravention of standing orders 14 Using force against a sentry etc Neglect of duty and misconduct 15 Failure to attend for or perform duty etc Bill 94 54/1 ii Armed Forces Bill 16 Malingering 17 Disclosure of information useful to an enemy 18 Making false records etc 19 Conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline 20 Unfitness or misconduct through alcohol or drugs 21 Fighting or threatening behaviour etc 22 Ill-treatment of subordinates 23 Disgraceful conduct of a cruel or indecent kind Property offences 24 Damage to or loss of public or service property 25 Misapplying or wasting public or service property 26 Sections 24 and 25: “public property”
    [Show full text]
  • The Police Reform Bill 14 MARCH 2002 [HL] Bill 48 of 2001-2002
    RESEARCH PAPER 02/15 The Police Reform Bill 14 MARCH 2002 [HL] Bill 48 of 2001-2002 This paper describes the background to the introduction of the Police Reform Bill, which is currently in Committee in the Lords. The Bill takes forward the agenda for police reform set out in the Government’s white paper Policing a New Century: A Blueprint for Reform. The paper contains a summary of the Bill’s various provisions and describes some of the relevant policy issues. It seeks to highlight particular areas of controversy and some of the reaction both to the white paper and to the Bill itself. A summary of the Lords’ deliberations up to the Committee stage is offered. There is as yet no date for the Bill to reach the Commons. A further update will be provided in time for second reading. Gabrielle Garton Grimwood HOME AFFAIRS SECTION Philippa Carling BUSINESS AND TRANSPORT SECTION Mark Oakes INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AND DEFENCE SECTION Recent Library Research Papers include: 02/01 Social Indicators 08.01.02 02/02 House of Lords Reform: the 2001 white paper 08.01.02 02/03 The Office of Communications Bill [Bill 73 of 2001-02] 14.01.02 02/04 The State Pension Credit Bill [HL] [Bill 30 of 2001-02] 15.01.02 02/05 The Employee Share Schemes Bill [Bill 13 of 2001-02] 16.01.02 02/06 Unemployment by Constituency, December 2001 16.01.02 02/07 The Justice (Northern Ireland) Bill [Bill 75 of 2001-02] 18.01.02 02/08 The Industrial and Provident Societies Bill [Bill of 2001-02] 23.01.02 02/09 Economic Indicators [This month’s article: The Introduction of the Euro]
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Marines Career Handbook “A Corps of Multi-Skilled Commandos Enabled by a Core of Specialist Commandos”
    ROYAL MARINES CAREER HANDBOOK “A CORPS OF MULTI-SKILLED COMMANDOS ENABLED BY A CORE OF SPECIALIST COMMANDOS” 2020 Edition - Version 1 CONTENTS Foreword 2 Mobility 52 DOCUMENT CONTROL Your career as a Royal Marines Commando 4 Armoured Support (AS) 52 Driver (D) 54 People Capability (Royal Marines) 5 This updated Royal Marines Career Handbook is a live on-line document. It will be updated Landing Craft (LC) 56 Career Management Overview 6 frequently with new and changing information as we transition to a Future Commando Force Royal Marines Aircrewman (RMAC) 58 Career Advice 7 and as we evolve the RM Career Management model and processes. You are therefore strongly Vehicle Mechanic (VM) 60 advised not to print this document as it WILL become out of date at that point. Stay Engaged 8 Career Interviews 9 Warfare Support 62 Armourer (ARM) 62 Your Early Career 10 Version Date Change Description Author Drill Instructor (DL) 64 Royal Marines UK Footprint 12 Metalsmith (MESM) 66 Royal Marine Units 13 Physical Training Instructor (PTI) 68 Promotion in the Royal Marines 14 Royal Marines Medical Assistant (RMMA) 70 Promotion Criteria 14 Royal Marines Police (RMP) 72 Promotion (Corporal – Stores Accountant (SA) 74 Warrant Officer Class 1) 16 Telecommunications Technician (TT) 76 Commando Duties (CD) 20 Specialisation Transfer – PSQ Transfer Board 78 Secondary Specialist Qualifications 22 Special Forces 80 Future Commando Force 23 Special Forces Communicator (SFC) 82 Breakdown of SSQ and PSQ 23 Special Boat Service (SBS) 84 Specialist Commando 24 Defence
    [Show full text]