Appendix a Regional Summaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a Regional Summaries Appendix A Regional Summaries Appendix A Table of Contents Introduction A-1 North Puget Sound Regional Summary A-5 South Puget Sound Regional Summary A-31 West Puget Sound Regional Summary A-57 Islands Regional Summary A-83 Olympic Coast Regional Summary A-95 Southwest Washington Regional Summary A-119 Lower Columbia River Regional Summary A-145 Middle Columbia River Regional Summary A-171 Upper Columbia – Downstream of Grand Coulee Regional Summary A-197 Upper Columbia – Upstream of Grand Coulee Regional Summary A-223 Snake River Regional Summary A-249 Columbia Basin Regional Summary A-269 Draft EIS A-iii Table of Contents Appendix A INTRODUCTION The geographic area of the proposed action and alternatives stretches across the entire State of Washington and includes all non-Federal and non-Tribal forestlands of the State (see Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3). These are the covered lands or the lands subject to State Forest Practices Rules. The State has been divided into 12 analysis regions (see Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3), which are used in Chapters 3 and 4 of this EIS to help describe the affected environment and environmental effects of the proposed action and alternatives. The regions were defined based on three factors: the distribution of threatened and endangered salmonids, Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) boundaries, and physiographic regions. The 12 analysis regions consist of 7 western Washington regions and 5 in eastern Washington as follows: Western Washington Analysis Regions • North Puget Sound • South Puget Sound • West Puget Sound • Islands • Olympic Coast • Southwest • Lower Columbia Eastern Washington Analysis Regions • Middle Columbia • Upper Columbia – Downstream of Grand Coulee Dam • Upper Columbia – Upstream of Grand Coulee Dam • Snake River • Columbia Basin Detailed summary descriptions were written for each of the 12 regions, providing baseline information for each area. The summaries include detailed descriptions of land ownership and use, as well as physical and biological factors that were developed for each of the analysis regions containing a substantial area of covered lands. Each Regional Summary includes seven sections: physical description, landownership and use, forestland ownership and management, habitat limiting factors, habitat trends, fish resources, and amphibians. Each of these sections is described below along with the sources of information used in each one. The Regional Summaries were developed by a number of individuals representing the Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Tetra Tech FW, Inc. 1.0 Physical Description The physical description section describes the location, geology, and hydrology of the region. Geology information was obtained from The Geology of Washington (Lasmanis 1991) and Washington DNR watershed analyses. Hydrology information was obtained from the Washington State Conservation Commission Habitat limiting Factors and Reconnaissance Reports and The Geology of Washington (Lasmanis 1991). Draft EIS A-1 Introduction Appendix A 2.0 Landownership and Use The land ownership and use section contains tables showing land ownership parameters (Federal, State, etc.) by WRIA and land cover and use (forestland, shrubland, etc.) for each region. The source for the data in the tables includes: the United States Geological Survey /U.S. Environmental Protection Act (EPA) National Land Cover Data GIS layer, Washington DNR Major Public Lands GIS layer, and Forest Service Northwest Forest Plan GIS layer. 3.0 Forestland Ownership and Management The forestland ownership and management section provides percentages of forestland ownership types including a percent of forestlands owned by small 20-acre exempt forest landowners. The section contains two tables, one including ownership and management of forestlands, and another including stream miles in each region by ownership category. The information for this section came from DNR major Public Lands, Forest Service Northwest Forest Plan, United States Geological Survey/EPA National Land Cover Data, and Washington DNR stream hydrography GIS layers 4.0 Habitat Limiting Factors Section 4.0 (Habitat Limiting Factors) was primarily written by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and discusses habitat limiting factors for salmon and trout, as well as for amphibians where relevant. The primary limiting factors are described for the region as a whole, and by major watershed or WRIA where data are available. Habitat limiting factors are specifically described for: (1) sedimentation and mass wasting, (2) riparian, floodplain and wetland conditions, (3) channel and hydrology conditions, (4) estuarine and nearshore habitat, (5) large woody debris, (6) fish passage, and (7) water quality issues. Information provided on limiting factors pertains not only to forest practices, but also includes other regional landscape conditions and uses (i.e., hydropower, agriculture, irrigation, development, and grazing). Major sources of information include, but are not limited to, Limiting Factors Analysis (Washington State Conservation Commission), Washington Department of Ecology’s 303(d) lists, Watershed Analysis, Federal recovery plans, and subbasin planning documents. 5.0 Habitat Trends Section 5.0 (Habitat Trends) was written by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and presents trends in habitat changes based primarily on land use practices, with an emphasis on forest practices. As with Section 4.0, primary sources of information include, but are not limited to, Limiting Factors Analysis (Washington State Conservation Commission), Washington Department of Ecology’s 303(d) lists, Watershed Analysis, Federal recovery plans, and subbasin planning documents. 6.0 Fish Resources Section 6.0 (Fish Resources) was written by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and describes the status and distribution of fish species. Fish distribution is provided for all fish species by WRIA. Federal and State status is provided for salmonid species, as well as other fish species. Sources of information include Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife fish distribution databases and SaSI, Wydoski and Whitney’s Inland Fishes of Washington (2003), Limiting Factors Reports (Washington State Conservation Commission), and Federal Recovery Plans. Introduction A-2 Draft EIS Appendix A 7.0 Amphibians Section 7.0 (Amphibians) was written by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and describes presence and status of any of the seven species of amphibians covered by the proposed HCP. This section also describes habitat limiting factors affecting these amphibian species. Sources of information include various scientific publications, as well as research and surveys conducted by professional biologists. Draft EIS A-3 Introduction Appendix A NORTH PUGET SOUND REGIONAL SUMMARY Draft EIS A-5 North Puget Sound Regional Summary Appendix A NORTH PUGET SOUND REGIONAL SUMMARY 1.0 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The North Puget Sound region includes five WRIAs (01, 03, 04, 05, and 07). Major stream systems include the Nooksack, Skagit, Sauk, Stillaguamish and Snohomish River Basins, as well as other smaller tributaries. Portions of Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish and King Counties are contained within the North Puget Sound region. A map showing the WRIAs of the North Puget Sound region is provided in Figure 1. The North Puget Sound region extends from the Puget Lowland physiographic province in the west to the Northern Cascades physiographic province in the east (Lasmanis 1991). Elevations range from sea level to over 10,000 feet atop Mount Baker. General Geology The North Puget Sound region is characterized by high mountains in the Cascade Range, wide alluvial river valleys draining east to Puget Sound, and high steep foothills between these river valleys. Geologically recent continental and alpine glaciations have left deep deposits of mineral sediment ranging from silt to rounded gravel, cobbles and boulders. The surface material in many of these foothills is composed of this poorly consolidated sediment, and the river valley substrate represents the alluvial sorting of this material. Geologically, contemporary eruptions from two volcanoes in the Cascade Range have deposited large volumes of mostly fine sediment in the Nooksack, Sauk and lower Skagit Rivers. Information concerning erosion processes in the North Puget planning region has been extracted from the following watershed analyses: Skookum (Resource Investments Inc. 1993); Deer Creek (Collins et al. 1994); Hansen (WDNR 1995a); Jordan-Boulder (WDNR 1995b); Hazel (WDNR 1996a); Lake Whatcom (WDNR 1997a). Mass wasting is the dominant erosion process in the North Puget region. Results of watershed analyses indicate debris avalanches, debris flows, and debris torrents are the most common landslide types. Debris avalanches comprised 72 percent of all landslides inventoried as part of the Jordan-Boulder watershed analysis (WRIA 05). In the Hansen watershed administrative unit (WAU) (WRIA 03), almost 95 percent of mapped landslides were classified as either debris avalanches or debris torrents. Most debris avalanches initiate in convergent topography such as bedrock hollows and inner gorges. Debris avalanches are controlled primarily by hillslope gradient, soil or colluvium thickness, rooting strength, and soil saturation and are less influenced by rock lithology (Collins et al. 1994). In the Jordan-Boulder WAU, 62 percent and 27 percent of identified
Recommended publications
  • Unitarian Universalist Common Endowment Fund Top 50 SSB Monthly Holdings Report As of September 30, 2014
    Unitarian Universalist Common Endowment Fund Top 50 SSB Monthly Holdings Report as of September 30, 2014 Asset Name Shares Market Value VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4,275 912,156.75 JOHNSON & JOHNSON 8,319 886,722.21 BAIDU INC ADR 3,925 856,552.75 FACEBOOK INC-A 10,700 845,728.00 INTEL CORP 23,051 802,635.82 AMAZON.COM INC 2,275 733,551.00 SALESFORCE COM INC 12,350 710,495.50 LINKEDIN CORP-A 3,075 638,954.25 NORTHERN TRUST CORP 8,902 605,603.06 REGENERON 1,675 603,871.00 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO 22,859 585,647.58 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO 6,795 569,013.30 PRAXAIR INC 4,359 562,311.00 GOOGLE INC-A 935 550,163.35 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC-A 810 539,937.90 BIOGEN IDEC INC 1,550 512,755.50 PROLOGIS INC 13,496 508,799.20 NIKE INC-B 5,692 507,726.40 JP MORGAN CHASE & CO 8,286 499,148.64 THE PRICELINE GROUP INC 425 492,396.50 ASML HOLDING NV 4,900 484,218.00 KIMBERLY CLARK CORP 4,288 461,260.16 MONSANTO CO 4,000 450,040.00 ROCHE HLDG LTD SPONSORED ADR 11,480 425,168.69 EMC CORP MASS 14,252 417,013.52 GOOGLE INC-CL C 710 409,925.60 WELLS FARGO & CO 7,401 383,889.87 NOVARTIS A G SPONSORED ADR 4,038 380,096.94 CAMPBELL SOUP CO 8,862 378,673.26 SEMPRA ENERGY 3,550 374,099.00 MERCK & CO INC 6,304 373,701.12 ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS INC 2,200 364,804.00 SCHWAB CHARLES CORP 12,300 361,497.00 OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP 3,725 358,158.75 CITIGROUP INC 6,810 352,894.20 CERNER CORP 5,900 351,463.00 ARM HOLDINGS PLC-SPONS ADR 8,000 349,520.00 NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO INC 4,500 342,450.00 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 13,406 337,429.02 SPLUNK INC 6,025 333,544.00 PLUM CREEK TIMBER CO INC
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Plan
    CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This watershed plan for the Hoko-Lyre Watershed provides a comprehensive review and evaluation of vital water resources in Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 19 and lays the groundwork for future management and stewardship of these resources. Located on the Olympic Peninsula (see Figure 1-1), WRIA 19 is a beautiful and remote area with few human inhabitants, though it carries a legacy of large- scale logging throughout the region. Based on the review of water resources, this plan outlines steps for ensuring the optimum ongoing use of the watershed’s surface waters and groundwater in a way that balances water needs for human use and environmental protection. An overview of the important characteristics of WRIA 19 is provided below. Appendix A provides more detailed descriptions of WRIA 19 features that are important for consideration in a watershed plan. Figure 1-1. WRIA 19 and Subbasins 1.1 WHY WAS THIS PLAN DEVELOPED? In 1998, the Washington State Legislature created the Watershed Management Act (Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 90.82) to support local communities in addressing water resource management issues. The act established a voluntary watershed management planning process for the major river basins in the state. The goal of the planning process is to support economic growth while promoting water availability and quality. The Act encourages local governments and interested groups and citizens to assess basin water resources and develop strategies for managing them. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) defined boundaries that divide the state into WRIAs, which correspond to the watersheds of major rivers, and established funding for groups in each WRIA that choose to undertake the planning process (funding is broken down by phases of the planning 1-1 WRIA 19 Watershed Plan… effort, as described in Appendix B).
    [Show full text]
  • Weyerhaeuser Company 2016 Annual Report
    WEYERHAEUSER 2016 ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10K Working together to be the world’s premier timber, land, and forest products company DEAR SHAREHOLDER: This past year was transformative for our company. This work continues. We now expect to exceed our Over the past three years, we have been relentlessly focused $100 million cost synergy on making Weyerhaeuser a truly great company by driving value target by 25 percent, realize for our shareholders through a focused portfolio, industry-leading a total of $130–$140 million performance, and disciplined capital allocation. In 2016, we in operational synergies, FRPSOHWHGWZRVLJQLÀFDQWPRYHVWKDWUHSUHVHQWWKHFDSVWRQH and continue delivering on on our portfolio journey: our merger with Plum Creek Timber our operational excellence and the divestiture of our Cellulose Fibers business. targets. Capitalizing on these PORTFOLIO opportunities will enable us Following these transactions, we have emerged as a focused to further improve our relative forest products company with 13 million acres of world-class performance. timberlands and an industry-leading, low-cost wood products CAPITAL ALLOCATION manufacturing business. 2XUÀUVWSULRULW\IRUFDSLWDO 2XUWLPEHUKROGLQJVDUHQHDUO\ÀYHWLPHVWKHVFDOHRIRXU allocation is returning cash largest competitor, and we are one of the largest REITs in the to shareholders, and we continued to deliver on that commitment United States. Through the Plum Creek merger, we also gained in 2016 by repurchasing $2 billion of common shares. We remain unparalleled expertise in Real Estate, Energy and Natural strongly committed to disciplined capital allocation, including a Resources. This new business segment will further maximize sustainable and growing dividend. the value of our acres by identifying tracts with a premium POSITIONED FOR THE FUTURE value over timberland and fully capturing the value of surface In September, we moved our corporate headquarters from and subsurface assets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES Fall, 1984 2 The Wild Cascades PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE ONCE THE LINES ARE DRAWN, THE BATTLE IS NOT OVER The North Cascades Conservation Council has developed a reputation for consistent, hard-hitting, responsible action to protect wildland resources in the Washington Cascades. It is perhaps best known for leading the fight to preserve and protect the North Cascades in the North Cascades National Park, the Pasayten and Glacier Peak Wilderness Areas, and the Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas. Despite the recent passage of the Washington Wilderness Act, many areas which deserve and require wilderness designation remain unprotected. One of the goals of the N3C must be to assure protection for these areas. In this issue of the Wild Cascades we have analyzed the Washington Wilderness Act to see what we won and what still hangs in the balance (page ). The N3C will continue to fight to establish new wilderness areas, but there is also a new challenge. Our expertise is increasingly being sought by government agencies to assist in developing appropriate management plans and to support them against attempts to undermine such plans. The invitation to participate more fully in management activities will require considerable effort, but it represents a challenge and an opportunity that cannot be ignored. If we are to meet this challenge we will need members who are either knowledgable or willing to learn about an issue and to guide the Board in its actions. The Spring issue of the Wild Cascades carried a center section with two requests: 1) volunteers to assist and guide the organization on various issues; and 2) payment of dues.
    [Show full text]
  • No Point Griping About CEO
    What the Boss Makes; Compensation by the Numbers The Seattle Times David Bowermaster July 9, 2006 Pay comes in a variety of packages that may be hard to identify, but the bottom line can still shock investors. The $18.2 million Nike paid William Perez in 2005 made him the highest-paid chief executive in the Northwest last year, according to The Seattle Times' annual calculation of how the region's public companies compensated their leaders. In Perez's case, it would be hard to argue he earned it. During his one-year tenure, Nike's stock price fell by more than $7 per share and The Swoosh lost nearly $2 billion in market value. Nike's board did not demand a refund when it asked the underperforming Perez to leave in January. Just the opposite. On top of his 2005 compensation, Nike gave Perez $8.3 million in severance pay, including $150,000 to cover moving expenses. "The board thought it was a reasonable accommodation to make his transition out of Nike as smooth as possible," said Shannon Shoul, a Nike spokeswoman. In this post-Enron era, such excesses have disturbed investors, who may grouse but have failed at curbing pay packages regardless of performance, and federal regulators, who proposed changes in January so investors can get a clearer picture of what CEOs make. "Over the last decade and a half, the compensation packages awarded to directors and top executives have changed substantially," said Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. "Our disclosure rules haven't kept pace ..
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Road History Tsurveyed, Nor Graded, Nor Overland
    he fi rst highways in the area now County–the Duwamish, Muckleshoot, Puyallup, Chapter II. known as King County were neither Skykomish, Snoqualmie, Suquamish, and Synopsis of Road History Tsurveyed, nor graded, nor overland. Tulalip peoples–developed thriving cultures They were the lakes, rivers and streams that with broad economic ties. Their relationships laced the landscape and provided the area’s with the land, and the social connections fi rst people with nourishment and a ready they cultivated with neighboring coastal means of transportation across the region’s varied and eastern interior tribes, necessitated topography. Therefore the county’s earliest a sophisticated transportation system. Puget overland trails closely followed or connected Sound, fresh water lakes and rivers offered these major bodies of water. These trails a ready means of transport; and the canoe, would eventually become the foundation for designed for light travel, made it possible the modern network of roads in use today. to penetrate far inland. Travel between settlements, as well as to and from resource Public road building in King County began areas, did necessitate some overland travel. shortly after its establishment in 1852. The In these instances, trails provided the shorter– earliest road law governing roads and the if more challenging–route. building of bridges was enacted in 1854 at the fi rst meeting of the Washington Territorial The most traveled footpaths through the Legislature. Over the next half-century, mountains crossed over the passes of lowest however, very little was expended on road elevation. Trails leading into King County development and maintenance due to the from the east over Naches, Snoqualmie and dominance of the railroads and the county’s Yakima Passes all followed the Yakima River continued dependency on water transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1995 Plum Creek Lectures Nick Baker, Editor
    Maluolm Hunter .' , Hamish Kimmins Nick Baker, lditor ' . Biodiversity: Toward Operational Definitions Hal Salwasser .._ Jack Ward Thomas .._ Alan Randall ~ F. Henry Lickers Malcolm Hunter .._ Hamish Kimmins The 1995 Plum Creek Lectures Nick Baker, Editor School of Forestry The University of Montana-Missoula Au.gust 1997 School of Forestry The University of Montana-Missoula The School of Forestry at The University of Montana-Missoula is a comprehensive natural resource education and research in­ stitution offering Bachelor's, Master's and Doctoral programs in forest and range re­ source management, wildlife biology, natu­ ral resource recreation, and natural resource conservation. The School's Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, insti­ tutes, and centers administer its research and outreach programs. Comprehensive information about the School and its programs is available at our WEBsite: http://www.forestry.umt.edu © 1997 School of Forestry The University of Montana-Missoula 1/ Partnerships in Forestry Research and Education The University of Montana School of Forestry has developed productive partnerships in research and education with the forestry industry, conservation organizations, and public agencies. This lecture series and the associated Plum Creek Fellowship are the product of such a partnership. The Plum Creek Fellowship The Plum Creek Fellowship provides a 12-month stipend and tuition for a doctoral candidate in the School of Forestry atThe University of Mont.ana -Missoula. A gift from the Plum Creek Timber Company established the UM Foundation endowment which supports the Fellowship. The Fellow assists the Plum Creek Lecture Committee in developing and hosting the Plum Creek Lectures. Plum Creek Timber Company Plum Creek Timber Company, the largest private forest landowner in Montana (1.5 mill ion acres), strives to manage its lands according to environmental principles based on sound sc ience, and to balance economic returns with protection for the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKING HISTORIC .SITES* on the 29Th Day of August, 1851, Citizens
    MARKING HISTORIC .SITES* On the 29th day of August, 1851, citizens living in the Northwest part of Oregon Territory met in convention at Cow­ litz and formulated a petition to the United States Congress ask­ ing for division of territory, and the erection of a new common­ wealth north of the Columbia river, to be known as "The Terri­ tory of Columbia." Several other things were asked for by the members of the convention: one of great importance was an ap­ propriation of $100,000 for the construction of a road across the Cascade Mountains from Puget Sound to Fort Walla Walla. Con­ gress of course could hardly do just what the people most inti­ mately concerned wanted done; but they did appropriate $20,000 for the construction of a military road from Fort Steilacoom to Fort Walla Walla via the Naches Pass, and they did enact a law creating a ·new Territory north of the ~olumbia, with much greater expanse than was asked, then too they called it Washington in­ stead of "Columbia." We of today, however, have no quarrel with Congress relative to either one of those digressions from the ori­ ginal petition. Deeming that the date and facts of the -Cowlitz Convention were of sufficient importance to be remembered, not only by the people of today, but ~lso by those of generations yet to come, the 'iVashington State Historical Society has erected, on the Pacific Highway, near the bank of the Cowlitz river, at Toledo, a granite monument, inscribed as follows: "August 29, 1851, a convention held at Cowlitz, 1 mile South, formulated a petition asking Con­ gress to divide Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Creek State Park Draft Management Plan
    FISH CREEK STATE PARK Draft Management Plan DECEMBER 2013 Explore More. Montana State Parks Our Mission is... To preserve and protect our state’s heritage and the natural beauty of our public lands for the benefit of our families, communities, local economies and out-of-state visitors. Our Objectives are... To provide excellent land stewardship, public safety and service through recreation, innovation and education. Our Goals are... To provide an extraordinary experience for our visitors and to keep our state park system strong now and for generations to come. Prepared by Montana State Parks A Division of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks 1420 6th East Avenue P.O. Box 200701 Helena, MT 59620-0701 (406) 444-3750 www.stateparks.mt.gov FISH CREEK STATE PARK DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN Fish Creek State Park Management Plan Approved Signatures Recommended by: ________________________________ ____________ Chas Van Genderen Date Administrator, Montana State Parks Approved by: ________________________________ ____________ Tom Towe Date Chairman, Montana State Parks & Recreation Board ________________________________ ____________ Jeff Hagener Date Director, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks i FISH CREEK STATE PARK DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN Acknowledgements Montana State Parks would like to thank the following people for their thoughtful insight and contributions to the Fish Creek State Park Management Plan: Members of the public, neighboring landowners and interested organizations who took time to attend scoping meetings, review the plan and provide constructive
    [Show full text]
  • Matching Gift Programs
    Plexus Technology Group,$50 SPX Corp,d,$100 TPG Capital,$100 U.S. Venture,$25 Maximize the Impact of Your Gift Plum Creek Timber Co Inc.,$25 SPX FLOW,d,$100 TSI Solutions,$25 U.S.A. Motor Lines,$1 Pohlad Family Fdn,$25 SSL Space Systems/Loral,$100 Tableau Software,$25 UBM Point72 Asset Mgt, L.P. STARR Companies,$100 Taconic Fdn, Inc.,$25 UBS Investment Bank/Global Asset Mgt,$50 Polk Brothers Fdn Sabre Holdings Campaign (October 2017),$1 Taft Communications,$1 Umpqua Bank,$1 Polycom Inc.,$20 Safety INS Group, Inc.,$250 Takeda Pharma NA,$25 Unilever North America (HQ),s,d Portfolio Recovery Associates,$25 Sage Publications, Inc.,$25 Talent Music,$5 Union Pacific Corp MoneyPLUS,d Match Your Gift PotashCorp,d,$25 Salesforce.com,$50 Tallan Union Pacific Corp TimePLUS,$25 Potenza,$50 Sallie Mae Dollars for Doers,d Talyst,$25 United States Cellular Corp,$25 when you donate to Power Integrations,$25 Saltchuk,$25 Tampa Bay Times Fund,r,$25 United Technologies Corp - UTC,d,$25 Praxair,d,$25 Samaxx,$5 TargetCW,$1 UnitedHealth Group Precor,$25 Samuel Roberts Noble Fdn Inc.,d,$100 Teagle Fdn, Inc.,d UnitedHealth Group (Volunteer) Preferred Personnel Solutions SanMar Technology Sciences Group,$10 Universal Leaf Tobacco Corp,$25 Preformed Line Products Co,r,d,$25 Sandmeyer Steel Co,r,$50 Teichert, Inc. Unum Corp,2:1,d,$50 Premier, Inc.,$50 Sanofi,$50 Teknicks,$1 Premier, Inc. Volunteer,$25 Schneider Electric Co (Cash & Volunteer),d,$25 Tektronix, Inc.,d,$20 Principal Financial Group,r,$50 Scripps Networks Interactive,r,$25 Teleflex,r,d,$50 V/W/X/Y/Z VISA Intl ProLogis,d,$50 Scripps Networks Volunteer,d,$250 Teradata Campaign (October),$25 VMware Inc.,$31 ProQuest LLC,$25 Securian Financial Group,r,d,$35 Terex Corp,$50 Vanderbilt Ventures, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • HABS No, WA-180 Tieton Ranger Station (White Pass Work Center) N
    HABS No, WA-180 Tieton Ranger Station (White Pass Work Center) N. side of State Hwy. 12, W. of State Hwy. 410 Naches Vicinity H/rBS Yakima County f/VA^J Washington ' *" ■' , PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service, Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94102 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDING SURVEY Ql" hJA'^K TIETON RANGER STATION (WHITE PASS WORK CENTER) HABS NO. WA-180 J I Location: North side of State Highway 12, approximately 17 miles west of the junction of State Highway 410 and 22 miles north and west of Naches, Yakima County, Washington. Buildings #1051, 1052, 1053, 1553 only. USGS Tieton Basin Quadrangle (7.5), Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: Easting 647000 and Northing 5170880. Present Owner: U.S. Government, administered by USDA Forest Service, Wenatchee National Forest, Naches Ranger District. Present Occupant: USDA Forest Service employee (#1052) Unoccupied (#1051, #1053, #1553) Present Use: Staff housing (#1052) Not currently in use (#1051, #1053, #1553) Significance: The Tieton Ranger Station includes eleven (11) buildings which are properties in a thematic group National Register of Historic Places nomination comprising Forest Service Administration structures built between 1933- 1942 under the auspices of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), on National Forest system lands in the States of Oregon and Washington. The thematic group as a whole and the four subject properties of this documentation are significant because of their direct association with the political and legislative events of the New Deal and the CCC, their association with the establishment of the USDA Forest Service and its stewardship of forest resources, and their embodiment of distinctive characteristics of the rustic style of architecture particular to the Forest Service in the Pacific Northwest Region and exclusive to the Depression Era, 1933-1942.
    [Show full text]
  • WEYERHAEUSER 2018 Annual Report and Form 10-K
    WEYERHAEUSER 2018 Annual Report and Form 10-K Working together to be the world’s premier timber, land, and forest products company DEAR SHAREHOLDER This is an exciting time to be assuming leadership for Weyerhaeuser. :HDOVRFRQWLQXHGRXUGLVFLSOLQHGXVHRIFDSLWDOWRLQYHVWEDFN I’m thrilled and honored to be part of the journey that lies ahead for LQRXUEXVLQHVVWKURXJKORZULVNKLJKUHWXUQSURMHFWVWKDW this great company. UHGXFHRXUFRVWVWUXFWXUHLPSURYHSURGXFWLYLW\DQGLQFUHDVH reliability across our operations. )RUWKHODVWÀYH\HDUVZH·YHEHHQLQWHQVHO\IRFXVHGRQJHQHUDWLQJ VKDUHKROGHUYDOXHE\VWUHDPOLQLQJRXUSRUWIROLRLPSURYLQJSHUIRUPDQFH A LEADER IN CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY DFURVVDOOEXVLQHVVOLQHVDOORFDWLQJFDSLWDOLQDGLVFLSOLQHGPDQQHU (DFK\HDUZHUHFHLYHQXPHURXVWKLUGSDUW\UHFRJQLWLRQVIRURXU GHYHORSLQJRXUSHRSOHDQGGULYLQJPHDQLQJIXOFXOWXUHFKDQJH sustainability and corporate citizenship performance. I encourage ,·PSURXGRIWKHZRUNZH·YHGRQH2XUEXVLQHVVVWUDWHJ\LVVLPSOH \RXWRUHYLHZDQHZVHFWLRQLQRXU3UR[\6WDWHPHQWWKDWIRFXVHV IRFXVHGDQGHIIHFWLYHDQGZHZLOOFRQWLQXHWRH[HFXWHDJDLQVWWKHVH RQRXUHQYLURQPHQWDOVWHZDUGVKLSVRFLDOUHVSRQVLELOLW\HWKLFV priorities in the years ahead. DQGWUDQVSDUHQF\7KHVHKDYHORQJEHHQFRUHYDOXHVIRURXU STRONG FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN 2018 FRPSDQ\7KH\DWWUDFWJUHDWSHRSOHWRFRPHZRUNIRUXVDQGKHOS XVPDLQWDLQVWURQJUHODWLRQVKLSVZLWKFXVWRPHUVDQGWKHFRPPXQLWLHV ,QZHGHOLYHUHGVWURQJSHUIRUPDQFHWKURXJKDEURDGUDQJHRI ZKHUHZHRSHUDWH,·PSURXGWREHSDUWRIDFRPSDQ\WKDWPDNHV PDUNHWFRQGLWLRQV2XUUHYHQXHZDVQHDUO\ELOOLRQIURPZKLFKZH FRUSRUDWHUHVSRQVLELOLW\DSULRULW\DQG,NQRZWKLVLVFULWLFDOO\ JHQHUDWHGQHWHDUQLQJVRIPLOOLRQXSIURPPLOOLRQLQ
    [Show full text]