DOCSLIB.ORG

RECONSTRUCTION Core Documents RECONSTRUCTION Core Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RECONSTRUCTION Core Documents RECONSTRUCTION Core Documents RECONSTRUCTION Core Documents Core RECONSTRUCTION Core Documents his volume continues the Ashbrook Center’s collection of primary Tdocuments covering major periods, themes, and institutions in RECONSTRUCTION American history and government. It is the third of a planned trilogy on the conflict over slavery. Causes of the Civil War and The Civil War will follow. This volume begins with a letter Lincoln penned in the midst of the Civil War, as Union forces retook territory and the U.S. Government Core Documents had to decide how to deal with freedmen and former slaveholders in the subdued rebel territory. It concludes with Frederick Douglass’ reflections in 1883 on a nation still divided racially—still, as he saw it, half slave and Selected and Introduced by half free. The intervening documents tell the story of the effort to reunite the country while guaranteeing the rights of the freedmen, as well as of Scott Yenor the opposition in the South and North that doomed that effort. he Ashbrook Center restores and strengthens the capacities of the TAmerican people for constitutional self-government. Ashbrook teaches students and teachers across our country what America is and Selected and Introduced by and Introduced Selected what she represents in the long history of the world. Offering a variety of programs and resources, Ashbrook is the nation’s largest university-based educator in the enduring principles and practice of free government. Scott Yenor is a Professor of Political Science at Boise State University. ISBN 978-1-878802-45-3 Scott Yenor Scott 9 781878 802453 Reconstruction: Core Documents Reconstruction: Core Documents Selected and Introduced by Scott Yenor Ashbrook Press © 2018 Ashbrook Center, Ashland University Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Reconstruction: Core Documents; Selected and Introduced by Scott Yenor p. cm. Includes Index 1. United States – Politics and government. ISBN 978-1-878802-45-3 (pbk.) Cover Images, above the title, left to right: John Sartain, Andrew Johnson, 1865. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, NPG.85.166. https://goo.gl/E8iaMC. Hon. Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia, photographed between 1865 and 1880. Brady-Handy photograph collection, Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, LC-DIG-cwpbh- 04097. https://goo.gl/nv1xn2 Alexander Gardner, Abraham Lincoln, President of the US, February 5, 1865. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C., LC-DIG-ppmsca-19215. https://goo.gl/LvEAFQ. Hon. Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania, photographed between 1860 and 1875. Brady-Handy photograph collection, Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, LC-DIG-cwpbh- 00460. https://goo.gl/WtA1RF George Kendall Warren, Frederick Douglass, 1876. National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, NPG.80.28. https://goo.gl/hvgNLg Cover Image, below the title: Matt Morgan, Massacre of the Negroes at Colfax Court House, 1873. Courtesy of the Historic New Orleans Collection, 1995.10.4. https://goo.gl/aorY8j Ashbrook Center at Ashland University 401 College Avenue Ashland, Ohio 44805 www.Ashbrook.org About the Ashbrook Center The Ashbrook Center restores and strengthens the capacities of the American people for constitutional self-government. Ashbrook teaches students and teachers across our country what America is and what she represents in the long history of the world. Offering a variety of resources and programs, Ashbrook is the largest university-based educator in the enduring principles and practice of free government. Dedicated in 1983 by President Ronald Reagan, the Ashbrook Center is governed by its own board and responsible for raising all of the funds necessary for its many programs. Visit us online at Ashbrook.org, TeachingAmericanHistory.org, and 50coredocs.org. Contents General Editor’s Introduction.................................................................. i Introduction ................................................................................................ iii 1. President Abraham Lincoln to General Nathaniel Banks, August 5, 1863 ............................................................................................. 1 2. President Abraham Lincoln, Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction, December 8, 1863 ....................................................... 3 3. Wade-Davis Bill and President Lincoln’s Pocket Veto Proclamation, July 2 and 8, 1864............................................................ 6 4. The 13th Amendment to the Constitution, December 18, 1865 ....................................................................................................................... 11 5. President Lincoln's Last Public Address, April 11, 1865.......... 13 6. President Andrew Johnson, Proclamation on Reorganizing Constitutional Government in Mississippi, June 13, 1865 .......... 18 7. Richard Henry Dana, “Grasp of War”, June 21, 1865 ............... 21 8. Black Codes of Mississippi, October - December, 1865 .......... 25 9. President Andrew Johnson, First Annual Address, December 4, 1865 ............................................................................................................. 31 10. Carl Schurz, Report on the Condition of the South, December 19, 1865 ................................................................................. 37 11. Frederick Douglass, Reply of the Colored Delegation to the President, February 7, 1866 .................................................................. 47 12. Alexander Stephens, Address Before the General Assembly of the State of Georgia, February 22, 1866 ............................................ 50 13. An Act to Protect All Persons in the United States in Their Civil Rights, and Furnish the Means of their Vindication, April 9, 1866 ............................................................................................................. 56 14. Congressional Debate on the 14th Amendment, February - May, 1866 .................................................................................................. 59 15. Charles Sumner, “The One Man Power vs. Congress!”, October 2, 1866 ....................................................................................... 67 16. Thaddeus Stevens, Speech on Reconstruction, January 3, 1867 ............................................................................................................. 75 17. Reconstruction Acts, March 2 and 23, and July 19, 1867 ...... 80 18. President Andrew Johnson, Veto of the First Reconstruction Act, March 2, 1867 .................................................................................. 86 19. Thaddeus Stevens, “Damages to Loyal Men”, March 19, 1867 ....................................................................................................................... 91 20. Democratic and Republican Party Platforms of 1868, May 20, 1868 and July 4, 1868 ............................................................................. 96 21. Executive Documents on State of the Freedmen, November 20, 1868 .................................................................................................... 101 22. The 15th Amendment, February 2, 1870 .................................. 106 23. The Enforcement Acts, 1870, 1871 ........................................... 108 24. President Ulysses S. Grant, Proclamation on Enforcement of the 14th Amendment, May 3, 1871 ................................................... 115 25. Charlotte Fowler’s Testimony to Sub-Committee on Recon- struction in Spartanburg, South Carolina, July 6, 1871 .............. 117 26. Senator Carl Schurz, “Plea for Amnesty”, January 30, 1872 ..................................................................................................................... 123 27. Associate Justices Samuel Miller and Stephen Field, The Slaughterhouse Cases, The United States Supreme Court, April 14, 1873 .................................................................................................... 132 28. Colfax Massacre Reports, U.S. Senate and the Committee of 70, 1874 and 1875 ................................................................................. 140 29. Chief Justice Morrison Waite, United States v. Cruikshank, The United States Supreme Court, March 27, 1876 ................... 150 30. President Rutherford B. Hayes, Inaugural Address, March 5, 1877 ........................................................................................................... 155 31. Frederick Douglass, “The United States Cannot Remain Half- Slave and Half-Free”, April 16, 1883 ................................................ 159 Appendices .............................................................................................. 167 Appendix A: Declaration of Independence .................................... 169 Appendix B: Constitution of the United States of America ...... 174 Appendix C: Thematic Table of Contents ..................................... 188 Appendix D: Study Questions ........................................................... 191 Appendix E: Suggestions For Further Reading ............................. 204 i General Editor’s Introduction This volume continues the Ashbrook Center’s collection of primary documents covering major periods, themes, and institutions in American history and government. It is the third of a planned trilogy on the conflict over slavery. (The earlier volumes, Causes of the Civil War and The Civil War, will be published as they are completed.) This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHTP-2009-06-National-Security-1.Pdf
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR Louis Fisher is Specialist in Constitutional Law with the Law Library of the Library of Congress. The views expressed here are personal, not institutional. Earlier in his career at the Library of Congress, Fisher worked for the Congressional Research Service from 1970 to March 3, 2006. During his service with CRS he was Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers and research director of the House Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, writing major sections of the final report. Fisher received his doctorate in political science from the New School for Social Research and has taught at a number of universities and law schools. He is the author of eighteen books, including In the Name of National Security: Unchecked Presidential Power and the Reynolds Case (2006), Presidential War Power (2d ed. 2004), Military Tribunals and Presidential Power (2005), The Politics of Executive Privilege (2004), American Constitutional Law (with Katy J. Harriger, 8th ed. 2009), Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the Presidency (5th ed. 2005), Nazi Saboteurs on Trial: A Military Tribunal and American Law (2003), and, most recently, The Constitution and 9/11: Recurring Threats to America’s Freedoms (2008). He has received four book awards. Fisher has been invited to testify before Congress on such issues as war powers, state secrets, CIA whistle-blowing, covert spending, NSA surveillance, executive privilege, executive spending discretion, presidential reorganization authority, Congress and the Constitution, the legislative veto, the item veto, the pocket veto, recess appointments, the budget process, the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, the balanced budget amendment, biennial budgeting, presidential impoundment powers, and executive lobbying.
    [Show full text]
  • Note Cards 651. Clara Barton Launched the American Red Cross
    Note Cards 651. Clara Barton Launched the American Red Cross in 1881. An "angel" in the Civil War, she treated the wounded in the field. 652. Lincoln's Ten Percent Plan Former Confederate states would be readmitted to the Union if 10% of their citizens took a loyalty oath and the state agreed to ratify the 13th Amendment which outlawed slavery. Not put into effect because Lincoln was assassinated. 653. Assassination of April 14, 1865 While sitting in his box at Ford's Theatre watching "Our American Cousin", President Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth. 654. John Wilkes Booth An actor, planned with others for six months to abduct Lincoln at the start of the war, but they were foiled when Lincoln didn't arrive at the scheduled place. April 14, 1865, he shot Lincoln at Ford's Theatre and cried, "Sic Semper Tyrannis!" ("Thus always to tyrants!") When he jumped down onto the stage his spur caught in the American flag draped over the balcony and he fell and broke his leg. He escaped on a waiting horse and fled town. He was found several days later in a barn. He refused to come out; the barn was set on fire. Booth was shot, either by himself or a soldier. 655. Ex Parte Milligan 1866 - Supreme Court ruled that military trials of civilians were illegal unless the civil courts are inoperative or the region is under marshall law. 656. Radical Republicans After the Civil War, a group that believed the South should be harshly punished and thought that Lincoln was sometimes too compassionate towards the South.
    [Show full text]
  • The Attorney General's Ninth Annual Report to Congress Pursuant to The
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S NINTH ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS PURSUANT TO THE EMMETT TILL UNSOLVED CIVIL RIGHTS CRIME ACT OF 2007 AND THIRD ANNUALREPORT TO CONGRESS PURSUANT TO THE EMMETT TILL UNSOLVEDCIVIL RIGHTS CRIMES REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2016 March 1, 2021 INTRODUCTION This is the ninth annual Report (Report) submitted to Congress pursuant to the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crime Act of2007 (Till Act or Act), 1 as well as the third Report submitted pursuant to the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crimes Reauthorization Act of 2016 (Reauthorization Act). 2 This Report includes information about the Department of Justice's (Department) activities in the time period since the eighth Till Act Report, and second Reauthorization Report, which was dated June 2019. Section I of this Report summarizes the historical efforts of the Department to prosecute cases involving racial violence and describes the genesis of its Cold Case Int~~ative. It also provides an overview ofthe factual and legal challenges that federal prosecutors face in their "efforts to secure justice in unsolved Civil Rights-era homicides. Section II ofthe Report presents the progress made since the last Report. It includes a chart ofthe progress made on cases reported under the initial Till Act and under the Reauthorization Act. Section III of the Report provides a brief overview of the cases the Department has closed or referred for preliminary investigation since its last Report. Case closing memoranda written by Department attorneys are available on the Department's website: https://www.justice.gov/crt/civil-rights-division-emmett­ till-act-cold-ca e-clo ing-memoranda.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement and 1796 Constitution • the Area That Became Tennessee
    ••••••••••••TENNESSEE CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY Settlement and 1796 Constitution • The area that became Tennessee was part of the 1663 land grant of North Carolina from Charles II. • In violation of the British Proclamation of 1763 prohibiting settlements west of the Appalachian Mountains, the Watauga settlement was founded in 1771. (T. R's "Great Leap Westward" He wrote that Robertson and Sevier were two of the three greatest leaders in the development west of the mountains, the third being George Rogers Clark) The Watauga Association adopted articles to govern their settlement in 1772—this was the first government west of the mountains. The last British Governor of Virginia, the Earl of Dunmore, wrote in 1774 that Watauga was "a dangerous example to the people of America of forming governments distinct from and independent of his majesty's authority." In 1775, Richard Henderson purchased a large area of Kentucky and Middle Tennessee from the Cherokees--20 million acres for 6 wagon loads of goods. The governments of Virginia and North Carolina refused to recognize it. It was Henderson who was behind the settlement of Nashville in 1779-80. James Robertson led most of the men and the livestock over land to the settlement. John Donelson led a flotilla by water, down the Tennessee River to the Ohio, up the Ohio to the Cumberland, and up the Cumberland to the settlement. The Cumberland Compact was signed in 1780. It provided for the government of the settlement. · After being ignored by North Carolina for many years, the eastern settlements attempt to form the state of Franklin in 1784.
    [Show full text]
  • Badges of Slavery : the Struggle Between Civil Rights and Federalism During Reconstruction
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2013 Badges of slavery : the struggle between civil rights and federalism during reconstruction. Vanessa Hahn Lierley 1981- University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Lierley, Vanessa Hahn 1981-, "Badges of slavery : the struggle between civil rights and federalism during reconstruction." (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 831. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/831 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BADGES OF SLAVERY: THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN CIVIL RIGHTS AND FEDERALISM DURING RECONSTRUCTION By Vanessa Hahn Liedey B.A., University of Kentucky, 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, KY May 2013 BADGES OF SLAVERY: THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN CIVIL RIGHTS AND FEDERALISM DURING RECONSTRUCTION By Vanessa Hahn Lierley B.A., University of Kentucky, 2004 A Thesis Approved on April 19, 2013 by the following Thesis Committee: Thomas C. Mackey, Thesis Director Benjamin Harrison Jasmine Farrier ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my husband Pete Lierley who always showed me support throughout the pursuit of my Master's degree.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW Swampscott and Quarry Reach A
    SATURDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2019 2019 2019 A year in the rear-view mirror Swampscott and quarry reach a dynamite plan By Steve Krause The agreement came as the re- impacted significantly over the ITEM STAFF sult of three months worth of com- years and we want to see some ef- plaints from Swampscott residents forts made to address those con- SWAMPSCOTT — After three about the noise, the public health cerns. We have a responsibility to months of listening to abutters the citizens of this town and we are articulate their concerns about risk from the dust, and structural damage to houses. hopeful that this will be a formative Aggregate Industry’s quarry blast- discussion. We’re looking to strike a ing, a solution to the situation was “We’ve had some very construc- tive discussions with Aggregate balance that is long overdue.” reached in October. Kurt Hines, AI operations man- Industries over the restriction of Town Administrator Sean Fitz- ager, along with members of both blasts per week and the power of gerald announced that AI had the Earth Removal Advisory agree to limit quarry blasts to two those blasts,” said Fitzgerald. “The per week. residents of Swampscott have been QUARRY, A3 Murder on a hot August night in Lynn By Gayla Cawley ITEM STAFF LYNN — It was like something out of a nightmare when a friendly youth basket- TECHNICAL ball tournament in Lynn turned into a mass shooting in August. Ward 6 Councilor Fred Hogan said he heard 15-20 shots ring out as he was walk- KNOW-HOW ing up to Warren Street Playground that Saturday night.
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RS22188 Updated January 4, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Regular Vetoes and Pocket Vetoes: An Overview Kevin R. Kosar Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division Summary The veto power vested in the President by Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution has proven to be an effective tool for the chief executive in his dealings with Congress. Since the founding of the federal government in 1789, 35 of 43 Presidents have exercised their veto authority a total of 2,550 times. Congress has overridden these vetoes on 106 occasions (4.2%). Presidents have vetoed 80 appropriations bills, and Congress has overridden 12 (15.0%) of these vetoes. This report will be updated at the beginning of each new Congress. Constitutional Basis and Importance To become law, the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 7) provides that all bills that have been approved by both houses of Congress must be presented to the President for his approval and signature.1 The President may sign a bill into law within the 10-day period (excluding Sundays) provided in the Constitution,2 let it become law without his signature, or veto it. The Constitution states that, when the President vetoes a bill, “he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated.” This type of action is called a “regular” or “return” veto. If, on the other hand, Congress has adjourned within the 10-day period after presentation of the bill to the President (thereby preventing the return of the bill to Congress), the President may simply withhold his signature, and the bill does not become law — a practice that has been dubbed a “pocket” veto.3 The President’s veto authority is among his most significant tools in legislative 1 These bills include joint resolutions, but do not include proposed amendments to the Constitution, which require a two-thirds vote in each house, and are sent directly to the states for approval.
    [Show full text]
  • AFP V. Becerra
    Nos. 19-251 & 19-255 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ________________ AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ________________ THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER, Petitioner, v. XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. ________________ On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ________________ AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF THE CATO INSTITUTE, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, HAMILTON LINCOLN LAW INSTITUTE, REASON FOUNDATION, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, FIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, AND DKT LIBERTY PROJECT IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS _________________________________________________ Joseph G.S. Greenlee Ilya Shapiro FIREARMS POLICY Counsel of Record COALITION Trevor Burrus 1215 K St., 17th Floor Mallory Reader Sacramento, CA 95814 CATO INSTITUTE (916) 378-5785 1000 Mass. Ave., NW [email protected] Washington, DC 20001 (202) 842-0200 March 1, 2021 [email protected] Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page i QUESTION PRESENTED NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), and its progeny held that courts should apply narrow tailoring to violations of the freedom of association. Has that requirement been overruled such that the right to associate privately does not enjoy the strong protective standard that applies to other First Amendment rights, which this Court has held requires narrow tailoring regardless of the level of scrutiny? ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED ........................................ i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................... iv INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .............................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................... 4 ARGUMENT ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "We Are in Earnest for Our Rights": Representative
    Representative Joseph H. Rainey and the Struggle for Reconstruction On the cover: This portrait of Joseph Hayne Rainey, the f irst African American elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, was unveiled in 2005. It hangs in the Capitol. Joseph Hayne Rainey, Simmie Knox, 2004, Collection of the U.S. House of Representatives Representative Joseph H. Rainey and the Struggle for Reconstruction September 2020 2 | “We Are in Earnest for Our Rights” n April 29, 1874, Joseph Hayne Rainey captivity and abolitionists such as Frederick of South Carolina arrived at the U.S. Douglass had long envisioned a day when OCapitol for the start of another legislative day. African Americans would wield power in the Born into slavery, Rainey had become the f irst halls of government. In fact, in 1855, almost African-American Member of the U.S. House 20 years before Rainey presided over the of Representatives when he was sworn in on House, John Mercer Langston—a future U.S. December 12, 1870. In less than four years, he Representative from Virginia—became one of had established himself as a skilled orator and the f irst Black of f iceholders in the United States respected colleague in Congress. upon his election as clerk of Brownhelm, Ohio. Rainey was dressed in a f ine suit and a blue silk But the fact remains that as a Black man in South tie as he took his seat in the back of the chamber Carolina, Joseph Rainey’s trailblazing career in to prepare for the upcoming debate on a American politics was an impossibility before the government funding bill.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced
    INFO RM A TIO N TO U SER S This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI film s the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fromany type of con^uter printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependentquality upon o fthe the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and inqjroper alignment can adverse^ afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note wiD indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one e3q)osure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photogr^hs included inoriginal the manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for aiy photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI direct^ to order. UMJ A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313.'761-4700 800/521-0600 LAWLESSNESS AND THE NEW DEAL; CONGRESS AND ANTILYNCHING LEGISLATION, 1934-1938 DISSERTATION presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Robin Bernice Balthrope, A.B., J.D., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War and Reconstruction 1861-18
    Civil War and Reconstruction pre-1861-77 Timeline Key Terms and Concepts 1850 Clay’s Compromise makes California a free state and Abolition The act of granting freedom to all slaves. introduces the Fugitive Slave Act. Black Codes A set of racist laws passed temporarily in southern states 1851 Harriet Beecher-Stowe published Uncle Tom’s Cabin. after the Civil War. 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act allows these two states to decide for Confederacy The Confederate States of America formed in 1861 from themselves if they have slavery. the southern states that seceded from the Union. 1857 Dred Scott case in Supreme Court establishes slaves as Conscription Act Passed in July 1863 leading to anti-African American property who could be taken anywhere is the USA. rioting in New York. 1859 Abolitionist John Brown launches a raid on Harper’s Ferry to Freedmen’s spark a slave revolt. Bureau A government organisation formed in 1865 to support freed Black slaves build a new life. 1860 Abraham Lincoln becomes President of the USA. Klu Klux Klan Violent racist group formed to terrorise Black Americans. 1860 South Carolina secedes from the Union, Reconstruction The project by Northern politicians to create a new more 1861 Six more states secede from the Union and create the Republican Party equal South and protect the rights of freed slaves. Confederacy. Political party formed in 1854 as a response to the 1862 Lincoln passes a Contraband Law which states that if slaves Kansas-Nebraska Act to support the free-soil movement. are property Union armies can seize them to work for the army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Federal Enforcement Laws, 1870-1872 - Freedom: Political
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 70 Issue 3 Symposium on the Law of Freedom Part Article 6 II: Freedom: Beyond the United States April 1995 The Making of Federal Enforcement Laws, 1870-1872 - Freedom: Political X1 Wang Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation X1 Wang, The Making of Federal Enforcement Laws, 1870-1872 - Freedom: Political, 70 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1013 (1995). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol70/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE MAKING OF FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT LAWS, 1870-1872* XI WANG** The Fifteenth Amendment represented the highest achievement of the Republican party's Reconstruction politics. By prohibiting the national and state governments from depriving citizens of the right to vote on the basis of race, color, and previous condition of servitude, the Amendment conferred suffrage on newly emancipated African- American men, thus constitutionalizing the principle and practice of black suffrage which was first established in early 1867. Black partici- pation in Reconstruction not only helped to consolidate the outcomes of the Civil War and congressional Reconstruction, but it also rede- fined the course of American democracy. In order to maintain the vitality and validity of the Fifteenth Amendment, the Republican party had to permanently and effectively implement that Amendment in the South, where anti-black suffrage forces mounted high.
    [Show full text]