Most Socially Active Professionals PDF Templates
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Workiva DIR Terms and Conditions
BY SIGNING AN ORDER REFERENCING, OR BY OTHERWISE MANIFESTING AGREEMENT TO THIS END USER ACCESS AGREEMENT (THE “END USER ACCESS AGREEMENT” AND ALONG WITH ALL ORDERS, THE “AGREEMENT”) ON BEHALF OF THE ORDER ACTIVITY INDICATED BY YOU AT THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE (“GOVERNMENT”) YOU ARE HEREBY AGREEING TO THIS END USER ACCESS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF GOVERNMENT. IN DOING SO THE YOU REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO BIND GOVERNMENT TO THESE END CLIENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND THE AGREEMENT. THE AGREEMENT IS BY AND BETWEEN GOVERNMENT AND WORKIVA INC. (“PROVIDER”). 1.0 Services. Provider agrees to provide the Subscription Services and Professional Services (collectively referred to herein as, the “Services”) as set forth in this End User Access Agreement and the applicable ordering document (an “Order”) entered into by Provider and Government. 1.1 Subscription Services. (a) Beginning on the start date set forth in the applicable Order (the “Start Date”), Provider agrees to provide Government with access to the Software set forth in the applicable Order (“Subscription Services”), and accordingly Provider hereby grants to Government and its employees or third party representatives (“Representatives”), a non-exclusive, non-transferable, worldwide right to access, use, and display the Software in connection with the Subscription Services. Users will be determined on a named user basis rather than on a concurrent user or shared user basis; provided that Government may reassign different individuals on a reasonable basis (e.g., an employee changes positions or leaves Government’s employ). Government is responsible for each of its Representative’s acts and omissions. (b) “Documentation” means the manuals, specifications, and other materials describing the functionality, features, and operating characteristics of the Software, available at https://success.wdesk.com/help, including any updates thereto. -
Christopher Egan, MAKING FINDINGS, and IMPOSING a CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER Respondent
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Release No. 10256 / November 15, 2016 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT Release No. 3823 / November 15, 2016 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-17678 ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND- In the Matter of DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT, Christopher Egan, MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER Respondent. I. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease- and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) against Christopher Egan (“Egan” or “Respondent”). II. In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Egan has submitted an Offer of Settlement (“Offer”), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted and except as provided herein in Section V., Egan consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below. III. On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that: Summary 1. This proceeding arises out of a financial fraud at Autonomy Corporation plc (“Autonomy”), a Cambridge, England-based software company. -
MHEC-10012015 Exhibit A1 - Network Products and Services December 2015
MHEC-10012015 Exhibit A1 - Network Products and Services December 2015 MHEC Proposed HP Networking Product Line % off USUDDP Classic Procurve Wired and Wireless Portfolio HP Networking Switching and SBN APs, controllers, MSM APs, 6H, I5 34% Networking RF Manager, MSM415, TMS zl, PCM, IDM,NIM, ProCurve switches HP Networking Enterprise Routing A6600, A8800, A12500, I6, 34 34% and Switching A5820X, A9500, A7500 MSR Routers, IMC, 8800, A3100, A3600, A5100, A5500, A7500, E4200, E4500, E4800, E5500, V14xx, V19xx. HP Networking Routing I7 34% Wireless=A3000, A7700, HP Networking A8700, A9000, Airprotect, A- WA AP, A-WX Controller, E3000, etc. IPS, NAC, Controller, Net- Procurve Security I8 34% Optics, SMS License HPN Network Management, HP Network Management and Wired Accessories, Routers- 1U 34% Software I7 and WAN Accessories, Software, Wireless Devices HP Network Accessories HP Network Accessories 35 34% WLAN WLAN 3P 34% Telephony Server HP Telephony 1U 34% Storage/VCX Hardware Services 7G, I9 20% HP Networking Services Software Services 7G 20% Installation Services 7G 20% MHEC Proposed Enterprise Security Products (ESP) Product Line % off USUDDP ArcSight Term & Perpetual SW licenses 49, 51 34% ArcSight Appliance 59 34% ArcSight Education Online Training F9, 5C 20% Education Classroom-based Training F9, 5C 20% Professional Services F9, 5C 20% Tipping Point Hardware and Software I8 34% Tipping Point Tipping Point Support I9 20% Atalla 5W 30% MHEC Proposed Aruba Networks, Inc, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company % off USUDDP Aruba Networking -
COMPLAINT I 1 G
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 I. INTRODUCTION. 1 3 II. NATURE OF THE ACTION. 6 4 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE.. 10 5 III. THE PARTIES. 11 6 A. The Plaintiff. 11 7 B. The Nominal Defendant. 11 8 C. The Individual Defendants. 11 9 D. The Bank Defendants.. 14 10 E. The Auditor Defendant. 15 11 F. Unnamed Participants. 15 12 IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS. 16 13 A. A Brief History of the Hewlett-Packard Company. 16 14 B. Mark Hurd Rejects Autonomy Acquisition. 17 15 C. HP’s Recent History of Bad Deals and Failures.. 18 16 D. Road to Autonomy: Léo Apotheker Becomes New CEO.. 20 17 E. HP Acquires Autonomy.. 23 18 1. August 18, 2011: HP Announces Autonomy Acquisition.. 23 19 2. September 13, 2011: HP Hypes The Value of the Transformative 20 Autonomy IDOL Technology in Order to Finalize the Autonomy Acquisition. 28 21 3. September 22, 2011: CEO Léo Apotheker Forced Out of HP; New 22 CEO Meg Whitman Continues to Praise the Autonomy IDOL Technology. 30 23 F. HP Ignored Serious Concerns About The Propriety of the Autonomy 24 Acquisition For $11.7 Billion.. 30 25 1. HP’s Chief Financial Officer Warned HP Against the Autonomy Acquisition. 30 26 2. HP Knew About Multiple Reports of Improprieties at Autonomy 27 and Multiple Red Flags About Autonomy. 31 28 3. Analysts Warned of Autonomy’s Outdated Technology.. 34 DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT i 1 G. Multiple Companies Refuse to Acquire Autonomy Because It Was OverPriced.. 36 2 1. Oracle Warns HP of Autonomy’s Overvaluation. -
Software Sector Summary Report
Software COMPANYSector PRESENTATION Summary Week of October 2, 2017 1 DEAL DASHBOARD Software $35.9 Billion 470 $29.1 Billion 76 Financing Volume YTD (1)(2) Financing Transactions YTD (1)(2) M&A Volume YTD (3) M&A Transactions YTD (3) Select Financing Transactions Quarterly Financing Volume (1)(2) Quarterly M&A Volume (3) Select M&A Transactions (4) $Bn $Bn (61)% Company Amount ($MM) 43% Target Acquirer EV ($MM) $14 $50 $270 $12 $41 $3,903 $10 $11 $9 $6 $6 $24 $250 $6 $5 $1,125 $16 $15 $12 ( ) $12 $6 $5 $70 $834 ( ) Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16Q3'16 Q4'16 Q1'17 Q2'17 Q3'17 Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16 Q3'16 Q4'16 Q1'17 Q2'17 Q3'17 $45 Quarterly Financing Deal Count (1)(2) Quarterly M&A Deal Count (3) $614 36% $35 9% $531 156 160 154 127 118 123 103 111 $35 94 29 29 29 29 $382 24 24 26 21 $32 14 $344 $26 $270 Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16Q3'16 Q4'16 Q1'17 Q2'17 Q3'17 Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16 Q3'16 Q4'16 Q1'17 Q2'17 Q3'17 Last 12 Months Software Price Performance vs. S&P 500 (5) M&A EV/ NTM Rev. Over Time (6) 35.0% SPX IGV All Buyers Strategic Buyers PE Buyers 30.0% 30% 6 ` 5.3x Financing Activity by Quarter 4.7x 4.9x 5 4.5x 4.6x 25.0% 4.2x 4.3x 4.0x 4.1x 3.9x 3.9x 3.7x 20.0% 4 3.6x 3.1x 16% 2.7x 2.9x 2.9x 15.0% 3 2.5x 2.5x 2.5x 2.2x 10.0% 2 5.0% 1 0.0% 0 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (5.0%) (10.0%) Notes: Source: Capital IQ, PitchBook, and Dow Jones VentureSource. -
North Concourse Level 2 North Mezzanine Level 3
North Mezzanine Level 3 South Mezzanine Level 3 North Mezzanine Level 3 South Mezzanine Level 3 S310 S320 S330 S331 D H S312 S319 D H S322 S329 D H D N310 N320 N330 C G S311 C G S321 C G C A E A E A B F B F B F B Corridor Corridor B F B F B S310 S320A E S330 AS331 E A Corridor E A N311 N321 C G C G C D H S312 S319 D H S322 S329 D H D N310 Corridor N320 N330Corridor D H N312 N319 D H N322 N329 D C G S311 C G S321 C G C A E A E A B F B F B F B Corridor Corridor B F B F B A E A E A Corridor E ASUGA Roundtable ASUG Speaker C G N311 C G N321 C Discussion Room Ready Room D Corridor H N312 N319 D Corridor H N322 N329 D ASUG Roundtable ASUG Speaker Discussion Room Ready Room AGENDA AT A GLANCE NORTH CONCOURSE SOUTH CONCOURSE South Concourse Level 2 MONDAY, JUNE 4 North Concourse Level 2 South Concourse Level 2 7:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m. Registration South Concourse LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2 and Hilton OrlandoNorth Concourse Level 2 Show Floor Show Floor Entrance Entrance 8:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. ASUG Pre-Conference South Concourse, Show Floor Show Floor Seminars Rooms S320–S331 Entrance Entrance (Additional Fees Apply) Entrance/Exit Entrance/Exit Entrance/Exit Entrance/Exit Destination TUESDAY, JUNE 5 Destination Lounge To 7:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m. -
HP Autonomy Data Protection
HP Autonomy Data Protection June 2014 David Jones, SVP/GM, Data Protection HP Autonomy HP Software: driving the new style of IT The 6th largest software company in the world Applications IT Operations Enterprise HP Autonomy HP Vertica Delivery Management Security Management Driving the new style of IT Driving the new style of IT Built to disrupt the Harnessing 100% of Analytics at extreme • Agility • Cloud / Hybrid adversary human information scale in real-time • Mobility • Operations Analytics • Enterprise • Data Protection • High performance analytics • DevOps • Service Anywhere • Application • Enterprise search • Massive scalability • Modern user interface • Automation & orchestration • Infrastructure • Information governance and management • Open architecture • Information analytics • Optimized data storage • Marketing optimization 2 © Copyright 2014 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. HP SW – HP Autonomy Leadership Team Robert Youngjohns, EVP, HP Software (Announced 5/22/14) Products Field/Mrkt/Ops Technology Functions Don Leeke Fernando Lucini Rafiq Mohammadi Global Sales & Sales Frank Ippolito CTO, HP Autonomy GM, Marketing Opt Operations Human Resources Mike Sullivan Andrew Joiner Mike Graves Emerging Technologies Jim Bergkamp GM, Engineering Finance eDiscovery/Archiving Marketing/Partners/Channel Don Avant Sean Blanchflower David Jones Operations & Research & Development GM, Data Protection Services IDOL Susan Ferguson Mohit Mutreja Neil Araujo VP, WW -
"SOLIZE India Technologies Private Limited" 56553102 .FABRIC 34354648 @Fentures B.V
Erkende referenten / Recognised sponsors Arbeid Regulier en Kennismigranten / Regular labour and Highly skilled migrants Naam bedrijf/organisatie Inschrijfnummer KvK Name company/organisation Registration number Chamber of Commerce "@1" special projects payroll B.V. 70880565 "SOLIZE India Technologies Private Limited" 56553102 .FABRIC 34354648 @Fentures B.V. 82701695 01-10 Architecten B.V. 24257403 100 Grams B.V. 69299544 10X Genomics B.V. 68933223 12Connect B.V. 20122308 180 Amsterdam BV 34117849 1908 Acquisition B.V. 60844868 2 Getthere Holding B.V. 30225996 20Face B.V. 69220085 21 Markets B.V. 59575417 247TailorSteel B.V. 9163645 24sessions.com B.V. 64312100 2525 Ventures B.V. 63661438 2-B Energy Holding 8156456 2M Engineering Limited 17172882 30MHz B.V. 61677817 360KAS B.V. 66831148 365Werk Contracting B.V. 67524524 3D Hubs B.V. 57883424 3DUniversum B.V. 60891831 3esi Netherlands B.V. 71974210 3M Nederland B.V. 28020725 3P Project Services B.V. 20132450 4DotNet B.V. 4079637 4People Zuid B.V. 50131907 4PS Development B.V. 55280404 4WEB EU B.V. 59251778 50five B.V. 66605938 5CA B.V. 30277579 5Hands Metaal B.V. 56889143 72andSunny NL B.V. 34257945 83Design Inc. Europe Representative Office 66864844 A. Hak Drillcon B.V. 30276754 A.A.B. International B.V. 30148836 A.C.E. Ingenieurs en Adviesbureau, Werktuigbouw en Electrotechniek B.V. 17071306 A.M. Best (EU) Rating Services B.V. 71592717 A.M.P.C. Associated Medical Project Consultants B.V. 11023272 A.N.T. International B.V. 6089432 A.S. Watson (Health & Beauty Continental Europe) B.V. 31035585 A.T. Kearney B.V. -
Corporate Governance Case Studies Volume Three
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CASE STUDIES VOLUME THREE Edited by Mak Yuen Teen Corporate Governance Case Studies Volume three Mak Yuen Teen FCPA (Aust.) Editor First published October 2014 Copyright ©2014 Mak Yuen Teen and CPA Australia. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, except for inclusion of brief quotations in a review. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, CPA Australia Ltd. Please contact CPA Australia or Professor Mak Yuen Teen for permission of use of any case studies in this publication. Corporate Governance Case Studies Volume Three Editor : Mak Yuen Teen FCPA (Aust.) Editor’s email : [email protected] Published by : CPA Australia Ltd 1 Raffles Place #31-01 One Raffles Place Singapore 048616 Website : cpaaustralia.com.au Email : [email protected] ISBN : 978-981-09-1544-5 II Contents Contents III Foreword V Preface VII Singapore Cases Airocean in Choppy Waters ...............................................................................1 A Brewing Takeover Battle for F&N ..................................................................10 Hong Fok Corporation: The Badger and The Bear............................................20 Olam in Muddy Waters ....................................................................................29 -
SAPPHIRE NOW® + ASUG Annual Conference Exhibitor Program Prospectus
Orange County Convention Center | Orlando, Florida | May 7–9, 2019 SAPPHIRE NOW® + ASUG Annual Conference Exhibitor Program Prospectus Conference Demographics Key Dates and Deadlines 2018 Exhibitor Listing Exhibit Packages Agenda at a Glance Eligibility and Contact Information Marketing Opportunities sapandasugexhibitors.com Apply Now 1 Orange County Convention Center | Orlando, Florida | May 7–9, 2019 Demographics Exhibit Packages Marketing Key Dates Agenda 2018 Exhibitor Listing Eligibility / Contact Conference Demographics Attracting Highly Qualified Buyers and Key Decision Makers This conference is an incredible opportunity for our customers to take advantage Expected Attendance 22,000 of diverse business perspectives, experiences, and best practices – all under one roof. As businesses are redefining themselves for the digital world, the convergence Hosted by SAP and ASUG, SAPPHIRE NOW and ASUG Annual Conference is a of SAP, ASUG, and our partner ecosystem are providing solutions for these challenges. premier innovative cloud and business technology conference. Over these three SAPPHIRE NOW and ASUG Annual Conference is where SAP partners will: dynamic days, attendees will: • Showcase their solutions, services, and software to thousands of SAP customers, • See how the world’s most successful and leading-edge companies are solving including senior executives, business leaders, and IT decision-makers economical, societal, environmental, and technological challenges of today • Engage with top executives from leading companies -
Analysis of Merger & Acquisition Frameworks from a Deal Rationale
Analysis of Merger & Acquisition Frameworks from a Deal Rationale Perspective in Technology Sector by Sridhar Narayanan Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in System Design and Management at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2019 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2019. All rights reserved. Author................................................................ System Design and Management Program May 24, 2019 Certified by . Dr. Bruce G. Cameron Director, System Architecture Lab Thesis Supervisor Accepted by. Joan Rubin Executive Director, System Design and Management Program THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 Analysis of Merger & Acquisition Frameworks from a Deal Rationale Perspective in Technology Sector by Sridhar Narayanan Submitted to the System Design and Management Program on May 24, 2019, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in System Design and Management Abstract Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity has been a widely researched area over the past century by both academic and industry experts. This paper summarizes the various frameworks that have been developed to explain the motivations to conduct M&A. While the frameworks themselves have been developed based on surveys of past success and failures, they are heavily relied upon by various M&A schools of thought to advise present and future strategies for the industry. In comparing these frameworks, the paper summarizes how deal rationales drive success or failure of M&A transactions. I analyze the HP-Autonomy case study to demonstrate how the different frameworks would approach the deal in question. I also look at thefailure modes demonstrated in the deal to better evaluate relevance of the frameworks to the intended deal rationale. -
August 2018 M&A and Investment Summary
August 2018 M&A and Investment Summary Table of Contents 1 Overview of Monthly M&A and Investment Activity 3 2 Monthly M&A and Investment Activity by Industry Segment 9 3 Additional Monthly M&A and Investment Activity Data 41 4 About Petsky Prunier 58 Securities offered through Petsky Prunier Securities, LLC, member of FINRA. This M&A and Investment Summary has been prepared by and is being distributed in the United States by Petsky Prunier, a broker dealer registered with the U.S. SEC and a member of FINRA. 2 | M&A and Investment Summary August 2018 M&A and Investment Summary for All Segments Transaction Distribution . A total of 726 deals were announced in August 2018, of which 360 were worth $36.1 billion in aggregate reported value • August was the most active month of the past 36 months, highlighted by record activity in the Digital Media/Commerce and Business & IT Services segments . Software was the most active segment with 254 deals announced— 146 of these transactions reported $10.0 billion in value . Digital Media/Commerce was the most valuable segment with 157 transactions, 102 of which were worth a reported $13.2 billion . Strategic buyers announced 346 deals (65 reported $14.3 billion in value) . VC/Growth Capital investors announced 347 transactions (290 reported $16.0 billion in value) . Private Equity investors announced 33 deals during the month (five reported $5.8 billion in value) August 2018 BUYER/INVESTOR BREAKDOWN Transactions Reported Value Strategic Buyout Venture/Growth Capital # % $MM % # $MM # $MM # $MM Software 254 35% $9,950.1 28% 89 $6,684.1 7 - 158 $3,266.0 Digital Media/Commerce 157 22% 13,213.4 37% 55 2,998.9 4 - 98 10,214.5 Business Services 130 18% 3,159.4 9% 91 2,379.0 9 75.0 30 705.4 Marketing Technology 72 10% 1,870.6 5% 31 548.4 3 50.0 38 1,272.2 Agency & Marketing Services 39 5% 775.5 2% 32 436.0 3 12.5 4 327.0 Traditional Media 32 4% 1,102.8 3% 24 800.8 4 230.0 4 72.0 *Note, transactions valued at $6 billion or more have been excluded from totals to limit comparative distortions.