DOCSLIB.ORG

Bacillus Thuringiensis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bacillus Thuringiensis This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization. Environmental Health Criteria 217 Microbial Pest Control Agent BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS Please note that the layout and pagination of this web version are not identical with the printed document Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization, and produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. World Health Organization Geneva, 1999 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), established in 1980, is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Labour Organisation (ILO), and the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 by UNEP, ILO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, WHO, the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, the United Nations Institute for Training and Research, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Participating Organizations), following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase coordination in the field of chemical safety. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Bacillus thuringiensis. (Environmental health criteria ; 217) 1.Bacillus thuringinesis – pathogenicity 2.Pest control, Biological – methods 3.Insecticides – chemistry 4.Environmental exposure 5.Occupational exposure I.Series ISBN 92 4 157217 5 (NLM Classification: QW 127.5.B2) ISSN 0250-863X The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. ©World Health Organization 1999 Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. CONTENTS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS PREAMBLE vii ABBREVIATIONS xv 1. SUMMARY ............................................1 1.1 Identity, biological characteristics, and analytical methods ................................1 1.2 Mode of action on target insects ...................2 1.3 Habitats .........................................2 1.4 Commercial products, production and application .....3 1.5 Effects of Bt on non-target organisms ...............3 1.6 Exposure and effects of Bt on humans ...............4 1.7 Conclusions .....................................4 2. IDENTITY, BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, AND ANALYTICAL METHODS ...............................6 2.1 Identity .........................................6 2.1.1 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) .................6 2.1.2 Relationship between Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus .......................6 2.1.3 Crystal composition and morphology ........7 2.1.4 Classification of Bt subspecies .............8 2.1.5 Genetics of ICP ..........................10 2.1.6 Beta-exotoxin ............................14 2.1.7 Other Bt metabolites ......................17 2.2 Bioassays ......................................18 2.2.1 Spore counts ............................18 2.2.2 International bioassay for ICPs ............18 3. MODE OF ACTION ON TARGET INSECTS ...............19 3.1 Bioactivity of field isolates ........................19 3.2 Mechanism of action of Bt formulations ............19 iii EHC 217: Bacillus thuringiensis ______________________________________________________ 3.3. Resistance of insect populations ..................21 4. NATURAL AND TREATED HABITATS ..................23 4.1 Natural occurrence of Bt ..........................23 4.1.1 Bt in insect hosts ........................23 4.1.2 Bt in soil ................................24 4.1.3 Bt on plant surfaces ......................24 4.2 Treated habitats .................................25 4.3 Environmental fate, distribution and movement ......25 4.3.1 Distribution and fate of Bt in terrestrial habitats .................................26 4.3.1.1 Fate of Bt and ICP on plant surfaces ........................26 4.3.1.2 Fate of Bt in soil .................27 4.3.2 Distribution and fate of Bt in aquatic habitats .................................29 4.3.3 Transport of Bt by non-target organisms ....30 5. COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION ..........................31 5.1 History of Bt and its commercial applications ........31 5.1.1 Production levels ........................31 5.1.2 Production processes, formulations and quality standards ........................31 5.1.3 General patterns of use ...................32 5.1.3.1 Applications in agriculture and forestry .........................32 5.1.3.2 Applications in vector control .....34 6. EFFECTS ON ANIMALS ...............................36 6.1 Mammals .......................................36 6.1.1 Oral exposure ............................37 6.1.2 Inhalation exposure ......................39 6.1.3 Dermal exposure .........................39 6.1.4 Dermal scarification exposure ..............40 6.1.5 Subcutaneous inoculation ................40 6.1.6 Ocular exposure .........................40 6.1.7 Intraperitoneal exposure ..................41 6.1.7.1 Immune-intact animals ............43 iv ______________________________________________________ 6.1.7.2 Immune-suppressed animals ......44 6.1.8 Effects of activated Bt ICP ................45 6.1.9 Studies in wild animals ....................45 6.2 Effects on birds .................................45 6.3 Effects on aquatic vertebrates .....................47 6.4 Effects on invertebrates ..........................49 6.4.1 Effects on invertebrates other than insects ..49 6.4.2 Effects on non-target insects ..............50 6.4.2.1 Aquatic insects ..................50 6.4.2.2 Terrestrial insects ................54 6.4.2.3 Honey-bees .....................59 6.4.2.4 Parasitoids ......................60 7. EXPOSURE AND EFFECTS ON HUMANS ................63 7.1 Bacillus thuringiensis ...........................63 7.1.1 Experimental exposure of humans ..........63 7.1.2 Exposure of workers during manufacture ....64 7.1.3 Exposure of workers in spraying operations . 64 7.1.4 Exposure of human populations by spraying operations over populated areas. ...........65 7.1.5 Clinical case reports ......................65 7.1.6 Dietary exposure of the general population ..66 7.2 Bacillus cereus ..................................67 8. EVALUATION OF HUMAN HEALTH RISKS AND EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT ......................69 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............70 10. PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS BY INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS .....................................71 REFERENCES ..............................................72 RÉSUMÉ ..................................................94 RESUMEN ...............................................100 v NOTE TO READERS OF THE CRITERIA MONOGRAPHS Every effort has been made to present information in the criteria monographs as accurately as possible without unduly delaying their publication. In the interest of all users of the Environmental Health Criteria monographs, readers are requested to communicate any errors that may have occurred to the Director of the International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, in order that they may be included in corrigenda. * * * A detailed data profile and a legal file can be obtained from the International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals, Case postage 356, 1219 Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland (telephone no. + 41 22 – 9799111, fax no. + 41 22 – 7973460, E-mail [email protected]). * * * This publication was made possible by grant number 5 U01 ES02617-15
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bt Resistance Implications for Helicoverpa Zea (Lepidoptera
    Environmental Entomology, XX(X), 2018, 1–8 doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy142 Forum Forum Bt Resistance Implications for Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Insecticide Resistance Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ee/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ee/nvy142/5096937 by guest on 26 October 2018 Management in the United States Dominic D. Reisig1,3 and Ryan Kurtz2 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, 207 Research Station Road, Plymouth, NC 27962, 2Agricultural & Environmental Research, Cotton Incorporated, 6399 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513, and 3Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Steven Naranjo Received 19 June 2018; Editorial decision 27 August 2018 Abstract Both maize and cotton genetically engineered to express Bt toxins are widely planted and important pest management tools in the United States. Recently, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has developed resistance to two toxin Bt maize and cotton (Cry1A and Cry2A). Hence, growers are transitioning to three toxin Bt cotton and maize that express both Cry toxins and the Vip3Aa toxin. H. zea susceptibility to Vip3Aa is threatened by 1) a lack of availability of non-Bt refuge crop hosts, including a 1–5% annual decline in the number of non-Bt maize hybrids being marketed; 2) the ineffectiveness of three toxin cultivars to function as pyramids in some regions, with resistance to two out of three toxins in the pyramid; and 3) the lack of a high dose Vip3Aa event in cotton and maize. We propose that data should be collected on current Cry-resistant H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Food Poisoning Toxins of Bacillus Cereus
    toxins Review The Food Poisoning Toxins of Bacillus cereus Richard Dietrich 1,†, Nadja Jessberger 1,*,†, Monika Ehling-Schulz 2 , Erwin Märtlbauer 1 and Per Einar Granum 3 1 Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Schönleutnerstr. 8, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany; [email protected] (R.D.); [email protected] (E.M.) 2 Department of Pathobiology, Functional Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 3 Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003 NMBU, 1432 Ås, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors have contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Bacillus cereus is a ubiquitous soil bacterium responsible for two types of food-associated gastrointestinal diseases. While the emetic type, a food intoxication, manifests in nausea and vomiting, food infections with enteropathogenic strains cause diarrhea and abdominal pain. Causative toxins are the cyclic dodecadepsipeptide cereulide, and the proteinaceous enterotoxins hemolysin BL (Hbl), nonhemolytic enterotoxin (Nhe) and cytotoxin K (CytK), respectively. This review covers the current knowledge on distribution and genetic organization of the toxin genes, as well as mechanisms of enterotoxin gene regulation and toxin secretion. In this context, the exceptionally high variability of toxin production between single strains is highlighted. In addition, the mode of action of the pore-forming enterotoxins and their effect on target cells is described in detail. The main focus of this review are the two tripartite enterotoxin complexes Hbl and Nhe, but the latest findings on cereulide and CytK are also presented, as well as methods for toxin detection, and the contribution of further putative virulence factors to the diarrheal disease.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure/Function of New Insecticidal Proteins and Regulatory Challenges for Commercialization
    This is an Open Access document downloaded from ORCA, Cardiff University's institutional repository: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/100278/ This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted to / accepted for publication. Citation for final published version: Moar, William, Berry, Colin and Narva, Kenneth 2017. The structure/function of new insecticidal proteins and regulatory challenges for commercialization. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 142 , pp. 1-4. 10.1016/j.jip.2017.02.001 file Publishers page: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2017.02.001 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2017.02.001> Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite this paper. This version is being made available in accordance with publisher policies. See http://orca.cf.ac.uk/policies.html for usage policies. Copyright and moral rights for publications made available in ORCA are retained by the copyright holders. The structure/function of new insecticidal proteins and regulatory challenges for commercialization William Moar, Colin Berry and Kenneth Narva Genetically modified crops produced by biotechnology methods have provided grower benefits since 1995 including improved protection of crop yield, reduced input costs, and a reduced reliance on chemical pesticides (Klumper and Qaim, 2014). These benefits have driven annual increases in worldwide adoption of GM crops, with the largest number of hectares being grown in the Americas (ISAAA 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • (Bacillus Thuringiensis) Maize
    Decomposition processes under Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize: Results of a multi-site experiment Jérôme Cortet, Mathias Andersen, Sandra Caul, Bryan Griffiths, Richard Joffre, Bernard Lacroix, Christophe Sausse, Jacqueline Thompson, Paul Krogh To cite this version: Jérôme Cortet, Mathias Andersen, Sandra Caul, Bryan Griffiths, Richard Joffre, et al.. Decomposition processes under Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize: Results of a multi-site experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Elsevier, 2006, 38 (1), pp.195-199. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.025. hal-03218784 HAL Id: hal-03218784 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03218784 Submitted on 5 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Decomposition processes under Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize: Results of a multi-site experiment Je´roˆme Cortet, Mathias N. Andersen, Sandra Caul, Bryan Griffiths, Richard Joffre, Bernard Lacroix, Christophe Sausse, Jacqueline Thompson, Paul Henning Krogh correspondance: [email protected] Abstract The effects of maize expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protein (Bt maize) on decomposition processes under three different European climatic conditions were assessed in the field. Farming practices using Bt maize were compared with conventional farming practices using near-isogenic non-Bt maize lines under realistic agricultural practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Fermentation of Bacillus Thuringiensis Var Israelensis
    STUDIES ON THE FERMENTATION OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS VAR ISRAELENSIS by DERMOT PEARSON School of Biological Sciences National Institute of Higher Education Du blin SuDmitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy June, 19ö5 COrfTENTS Section Page i INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PREFACE 2 1.2 BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDES 4 1.2.1 Insect Classification 6 1.3 ORGANISMS USED IN BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDES lU 1.3.1 Viruses in Insect Control 1U 1.3.2 Fungi in Insect Control 14 1.3.3. Nematodes in Insect Control 18 1.3.4 Protozoans in Insect Control - 2U 1.3.5 Bacteria in Insect Control 22 1.3.5.1 Bacillus popillae as a microbial insecticide 25 1.3.5.2 Bacillus sphaericus as a microbial insecticide 28 1.3.5.3. Bacillus thuringiensis as amicrooial insecticide 31 1.4 BACILLUS THURI1MGIENSIS 34 1.4.1 Bacteriology 34 1.4.2 Classification and Taxonomy 35 1.4.2.1 Tecnniques used in the taxonomy of B. thuringiensis, ana nomenclature recommendations . 36 1.4.2.2 SuD-groups of B. thuringiensis based on flagellar antigens 37 1.4.3 Toxins Produced by B. thuringiensis 38 1.4.3.1 Note on classification of toxins produced by bacteria 38 1.4.3.2 Alpha-exotoxin, phospholi pase C, lecithinase 4U 1.4.3.3 Beta-exotoxin or thuringiensin 40 1.4.3.4 Gamma-exotoxin 41 Section Page 1.4.3. b Parasporal crystal toxin 43 1.4.4 Genetics of B. thuringiensis 43 1.4.4.1 Plasmid analysis 43 1.4.4.2 Genetic transfer systems and crystal protein gene cloning 44 l .
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of Bacillus Thuringiensis Simulant Strains Suitable for Environmental Release
    ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY crossm Construction of Bacillus thuringiensis Simulant Strains Suitable for Downloaded from Environmental Release Sangjin Park,a,b Changhwan Kim,b Daesang Lee,b Dong Hyun Song,b Ki Cheol Cheon,b Hong Suk Lee,b Seong Joo Kim,b Jee Cheon Kim,b Sang Yup Leea,c,d Metabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), Center for Systems and Synthetic Biotechnology, Institute for http://aem.asm.org/ the BioCentury, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Koreaa; The 5th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development (ADD), Daejeon, Republic of Koreab; BioProcess Engineering Research Center, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Koreac; BioInformatics Research Center, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Koread ABSTRACT For a surrogate bacterium to be used in outdoor studies, it is important to consider environmental and human safety and ease of detection. Recently, Bacil- Received 14 January 2017 Accepted 24 lus thuringiensis, a popular bioinsecticide bacterium, has been gaining attention as a February 2017 Accepted manuscript posted online 3 on July 22, 2018 by University of Queensland Library surrogate bacterium for use in biodefense. In this study, we constructed simulant March 2017 strains of B. thuringiensis with enhanced characteristics for environmental studies. Citation Park S, Kim C, Lee D, Song DH, Cheon Through transposon mutagenesis, pigment genes were inserted into the chromo- KC, Lee HS, Kim SJ, Kim JC, Lee SY. 2017. some, producing yellow-colored colonies for easy detection. To prevent persistence Construction of Bacillus thuringiensis simulant strains suitable for environmental release. Appl of spores in the environment, a genetic circuit was designed to produce a spore Environ Microbiol 83:e00126-17.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2019/067496 Al 04 April 2019 (04.04.2019) W 1P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/067496 Al 04 April 2019 (04.04.2019) W 1P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: C07K 14/00 (2006.01) A01N 63/00 (2006.01) C12N 15/63 (2006.01) (21) International Application Number: PCT/US20 18/052788 (22) International Filing Date: 26 September 2018 (26.09.2018) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Language: English (30) Priority Data: 62/563,228 26 September 2017 (26.09.2017) US (71) Applicant: DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC [US/US]; 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268 (US). (72) Inventors: ZACK, Marc D.; 9330 Zionsville Road, Indi¬ anapolis, IN 46268 (US). SOPKO, Megan; 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268 (US). HASLER, James M.; 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268 (US). (74) Agent: RIVAS, Marcos; Dow AgroSciences LLC, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 (US). (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available) : AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5.3 MON 810 Literature Review – List of All Hits (June 2016
    Appendix 5.3 MON 810 literature review – List of all hits (June 2016-May 2017) -Web of ScienceTM Core Collection database 12/8/2016 Web of Science [v.5.23] ­ Export Transfer Service Web of Science™ Page 1 (Records 1 ­­ 50) [ 1 ] Record 1 of 50 Title: Ground beetle acquisition of Cry1Ab from plant­ and residue­based food webs Author(s): Andow, DA (Andow, D. A.); Zwahlen, C (Zwahlen, C.) Source: BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Volume: 103 Pages: 204­209 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.09.009 Published: DEC 2016 Abstract: Ground beetles are significant predators in agricultural habitats. While many studies have characterized effects of Bt maize on various carabid species, few have examined the potential acquisition of Cry toxins from live plants versus plant residue. In this study, we examined how live Bt maize and Bt maize residue affect acquisition of Cry1Ab in six species. Adult beetles were collected live from fields with either current­year Bt maize, one­year­old Bt maize residue, two­year­old Bt maize residue, or fields without any Bt crops or residue for the past two years, and specimens were analyzed using ELISA. Observed Cry1Ab concentrations in the beetles were similar to that reported in previously published studies. Only one specimen of Cyclotrachelus iowensis acquired Cry1Ab from two­year­old maize residue. Three species acquired Cry1Ab from fields with either live plants or plant residue (Cyclotrachelus iowensis, Poecilus lucublandus, Poecilus chalcites), implying participation in both live­plant and residue­based food webs. Two species acquired toxin from fields with live plants, but not from fields with residue (Bembidion quadrimaculatum, Elaphropus incurvus), suggesting participation only in live plant­based food webs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aedes Aegypti Mos20 Cells Internalizes Cry Toxins by Endocytosis, and Actin Has a Role in the Defense Against Cry11aa Toxin
    Toxins 2014, 6, 464-487; doi:10.3390/toxins6020464 OPEN ACCESS toxins ISSN 2072-6651 www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins Article Aedes aegypti Mos20 Cells Internalizes Cry Toxins by Endocytosis, and Actin Has a Role in the Defense against Cry11Aa Toxin Adriana Vega-Cabrera 1, Angeles Cancino-Rodezno 2, Helena Porta 1 and Liliana Pardo-Lopez 1,* 1 Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo, Postal 510-3, Cuernavaca 62250, Morelos, Mexico; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.V.-C.); [email protected] (H.P.) 2 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Av. Universidad 3000, Coyoacán, Distrito Federal 04510, Mexico; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-777-3291-624; Fax: +52-777-3291-624. Received: 14 October 2013; in revised form: 11 January 2014 / Accepted: 16 January 2014 / Published: 28 January 2014 Abstract: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry toxins are used to control Aedes aegypti, an important vector of dengue fever and yellow fever. Bt Cry toxin forms pores in the gut cells, provoking larvae death by osmotic shock. Little is known, however, about the endocytic and/or degradative cell processes that may counteract the toxin action at low doses. The purpose of this work is to describe the mechanisms of internalization and detoxification of Cry toxins, at low doses, into Mos20 cells from A. aegypti, following endocytotic and cytoskeletal markers or specific chemical inhibitors. Here, we show that both clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent endocytosis are involved in the internalization into Mos20 cells of Cry11Aa, a toxin specific for Dipteran, and Cry1Ab, a toxin specific for Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Knockdown of the MAPK P38 Pathway Increases the Susceptibility of Chilo
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Knockdown of the MAPK p38 pathway increases the susceptibility of Chilo suppressalis Received: 07 November 2016 Accepted: 31 January 2017 larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis Published: 06 March 2017 Cry1Ca toxin Lin Qiu1,2, Jinxing Fan2, Lang Liu2, Boyao Zhang2, Xiaoping Wang2, Chaoliang Lei2, Yongjun Lin1 & Weihua Ma1,2 The bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) produces a wide range of toxins that are effective against a number of insect pests. Identifying the mechanisms responsible for resistance to Bt toxin will improve both our ability to control important insect pests and our understanding of bacterial toxicology. In this study, we investigated the role of MAPK pathways in resistance against Cry1Ca toxin in Chilo suppressalis, an important lepidopteran pest of rice crops. We first cloned the full-length ofC. suppressalis mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38, ERK1, and ERK2, and a partial sequence of JNK (hereafter Csp38, CsERK1, CsERK2 and CsJNK). We could then measure the up-regulation of these MAPK genes in larvae at different times after ingestion of Cry1Ca toxin. Using RNA interference to knockdown Csp38, CsJNK, CsERK1 and CsERK2 showed that only knockdown of Csp38 significantly increased the mortality of larvae to Cry1Ca toxin ingested in either an artificial diet, or after feeding on transgenic rice expressed Cry1Ca. These results suggest that MAPK p38 is responsible for the resistance of C. suppressalis larvae to Bt Cry1Ca toxin. Pore-forming toxins (PFT) play an important role in bacterial pathogenesis and the development of pest resistant strains of crops1–3. Several previous studies have shown that PFTs such as streptolysin O (Streptococcus pyogenes), α -hemolysin (Escherichia coli), α -toxin (Staphylococcus aureus) and Crystal (Cry) toxin (Bacillus thuringien- sis) (Bt) have high toxicity to insect pests4–7.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Labour and Terminal Differentiation in a Novel Bacillus Thuringiensis Strain
    The ISME Journal (2015) 9, 286–296 & 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/15 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Division of labour and terminal differentiation in a novel Bacillus thuringiensis strain Chao Deng1,2,3, Leyla Slamti2,3, Ben Raymond4, Guiming Liu5, Christelle Lemy2,3, Myriam Gominet6, Jingni Yang1, Hengliang Wang7, Qi Peng1, Jie Zhang1, Didier Lereclus2,3 and Fuping Song1 1State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China; 2INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, La Minie`re, 78280 Guyancourt, France; 3AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France; 4Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot SL57PY, UK; 5CAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; 6Institut Pasteur, CNRS URA 2172, Unite´ de Biologie des Bacte´ries Pathoge`nes a` Gram positif, Paris, France and 7Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing, China A major challenge in bacterial developmental biology has been to understand the mechanisms underlying cell fate decisions. Some differentiated cell types display cooperative behaviour. Cooperation is one of the greatest mysteries of evolutionary biology and microbes have been considered as an excellent system for experimentally testing evolution theories. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a spore-forming bacterium, which is genetically closely related to B. anthracis, the agent of anthrax, and to B. cereus, an opportunistic human pathogen. The defining feature that distinguishes Bt from its relatives is its ability to produce crystal inclusions in the sporulating cells.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Structural And
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Fakultät für Chemie Lehrstuhl für Biochemie Structural and biochemical characterization of the YaxAB pore- forming toxin from Yersinia enterocolitica Bastian Loong Wang Yung Shan Bräuning Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Chemie der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzende/-r: Prof. Dr. Matthias Feige Prüfende/-r der Dissertation: 1. Prof. Dr. Michael Groll 2. Prof. Dr. Franz Hagn 3. Prof. Dr. Michal Sharon (schriftliche Begutachtung), 4. Prof. Dr. Tanja Gulder (mündliche Prüfung) Die Dissertation wurde am 09.04.2018 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Chemie am 23.05.2018 angenommen. Table of contents Chapter 1 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 11 1.1 The enterobacteriaceae: successful pathogens with a broad host spectrum .................... 11 1.1.1 The human pathogen Yersinia enterocolitica ........................................................................ 12 1.1.2 The insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens .................................................................. 12 1.2 Pore-forming toxins (PFT) as virulence
    [Show full text]