DOCSLIB.ORG

Recomendaciones Para La Protección De Personas Migrantes, Solicitantes De Asilo Y Refugiadas Ante La Crisis Del Coronavirus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recomendaciones Para La Protección De Personas Migrantes, Solicitantes De Asilo Y Refugiadas Ante La Crisis Del Coronavirus CONVOCATORIAS, COMUNICADOS, AVISOS, DOCUMENTOS MÉXICO–EE.UU. – COMUNICADO Recomendaciones para la Protección de Personas Migrantes, Solicitantes de Asilo y Refugiadas ante la Crisis del Coronavirus / COVID-19 OSC y casas del migrante en frontera entre México y Estados Unidos envían propuestas a alcaldes, gobernadores y autoridades federales para implementar medidas ante #COVID19 hacia migrantes y comunidades fronterizas. Ver comunicado en español – Ver comunicado en inglés ASIA PACÍFICO – DECLARACIÓN Declaración de la Oficina Regional de ACNUR para Asia y el Pacífico acerca de las noticias sobre desplazamientos por vía marítima de personas refugiadas y solicitantes de asilo Estas declaraciones son atribuibles al Sr. Indrika Ratwatte, Director de la Oficina Regional para Asia y el Pacífico. Por Indrika Ratwatte ACNUR México – 23 de abril de 2020 ACNUR, la Agencia de la ONU para los Refugiados, insta a los Estados a mejorar su coordinación y el reparto de las responsabilidades para abordar los desplazamientos marítimos de personas refugiadas y solicitantes de asilo en el golfo de Bengala y el mar de Andamán. ACNUR está cada vez más preocupado ante las noticias sobre la imposibilidad de que estas embarcaciones en peligro puedan desembarcar y por el grave riesgo inmediato que ello supone para los hombres, mujeres, niños y niñas que se encuentran abordo. Las acciones de búsqueda y de rescate, junto con un rápido desembarco, son actos que salvan vidas. El drama - en muchos casos con consecuencias mortales- de miles de personas refugiadas y migrantes en el golfo de Bengala y el mar de Andamán en 2015, demostró en última instancia lo críticas que resultan la solidaridad y la acción conjunta, que son imperativo humanitario, para salvar vidas en el mar. En 2016, la Declaración de Bali recogió estos principios y señaló el camino a seguir para evitar una nueva crisis en el mar de Andamán. Hoy, no debemos volver a una incertidumbre que puede resultar letal… Ver comunicado MÉXICO – CONVOCATORIA Articulaciones: Diálogos sobre Covid-19, derechos y desigualdades – Sesión 5: Desafíos para la igualdad de género frente a la pandemia Súmate a la conversación y acompáñanos a analizar la situación a partir de las experiencias de otros países y de la región sobre cómo afrontar la pandemia, garantizando los derechos de todas y todos. Ante la emergencia, nos articulamos y sumamos voces para ser más fuertes Fundar – 28 de abril de 2020, 12:00-13:30 El contexto de pandemia actual hace evidente la necesidad de analizar las estructuras sociales y culturales que, en otros tiempos de crisis, han permitido que algunas vidas sean “dignas de ser rescatadas”, y otras no. En esta sesión reflexionaremos de manera colectiva, sobre los impactos y riesgos diferenciados que tiene el Covid-19 en las mujeres (en sus diversidades) desde una perspectiva de género e interseccional, en un contexto inequitativo generado por las desigualdades existentes desde antes de la pandemia. Rebeca Ramos, directora de GIRE Marcelina Bautista, fundadora del Centro de Apoyo de Capacitación de Empleadas del Hogar (CACEH) Yásnaya Aguilar, activista mixe, miembro de Colectivo Mixe Colmix Sayuri Herrera, fiscal para la investigación de delitos de Feminicidio en la Ciudad de México Claudia de Anda, coordinadora de Gestión Institucional y del Conocimiento de Fundar Moderadora: Claudia García, analista de Gestión Institucional y del Conocimiento de Fundar Visitar sitio de Fundar (acceso a sesiones anteriores y registro) ANÁLISIS Y OPINIÓN EE.UU.–LATINOAMÉRICA Video: ¿Se respetan los derechos humanos de los migrantes ante la pandemia? Por Fernando del Rincón CNN – 17 de abril de 2020 La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos instó a los gobiernos a respetar y proteger los derechos humanos, al tiempo que responden a la emergencia de la pandemia de coronavirus. Hablamos de este tema con Patricio Pazmiño, vicepresidente de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Ver videonota EE.UU.–MÉXICO Una amistad riesgosa para México La amistad entre Andrés Manuel López Obrador y Donald Trump terminará tan pronto cuando en la campaña de reelección, el presidente de Estados Unidos empiece sus ataques a México. Por Jorge Santibáñez Los Angeles Times – 21 de abril de 2020 El presidente mexicano ha hecho de su relación con Donald Trump, uno de los pilares de su gobierno, lo ha dicho con toda claridad, no va a pelearse con él y en la práctica lo ha demostrado una y otra vez. A pesar de lo que dijo cuando era candidato, en el sentido de que no se prestaría a hacerle el trabajo sucio a Estados Unidos y detener en México a los migrantes centroamericanos en tránsito hacia el vecino del norte, con tan sólo un mensaje de tuit pasó, casi de un día para otro, a hacer lo contrario. Es quizá una de sus estrategias en la que ha sido más consistente. No obstante que como candidato hizo un libro crítico de Trump, como presidente no ha emitido una sola declaración mínimamente crítica, aun cuando era difícil no hacerlo y no hubiera tenido ninguna consecuencia. Sólo por dignidad… Ver artículo completo EE.UU. Donald Trump's immigration ban could hit tech sector Por Justin Harper BBC – 21 de abril de 2020 President Donald Trump's immigration ban could be a big blow for the fast-growing US technology sector. A rising number of migrant workers, particularly from Asia, head to the US to work in Silicon Valley. Alongside Mexico, China and India now provide large numbers of the new working population. This supply of talent could soon be cut off under Mr Trump's temporary ban, aimed at stopping the virus spreading and protecting American jobs… Ver artículo completo (en inglés) EE.UU. 10 datos sobre los inmigrantes en la lucha contra la pandemia, mientras Trump anuncia restricciones Por Catherine E. Shoichet CNN – 21 de abril de 2020 El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, ha anunciado nuevas restricciones de inmigración en medio de la pandemia de coronavirus, a pesar de que su país tiene más casos confirmados de covid-19 que cualquier otro lugar del mundo. Aunque todavía faltan algunos detalles por definir del plan de Trump, sí sabemos bastante sobre el papel que los inmigrantes han desempeñado en la primera línea de esta pandemia. Los trabajadores nacidos en el extranjero representan aproximadamente el 17% de la fuerza laboral civil en EE.UU. Sin embargo, conforman una parte aún mayor de la fuerza laboral en muchos empleos que son clave para combatir el virus y mantener el país a flote, según un análisis reciente del Instituto de Política Migratoria (MPI por sus siglas en inglés). También es probable que los inmigrantes resulten desproporcionadamente afectados por los despidos, añadió el instituto. Aquí te dejamos algunas estadísticas clave sobre los trabajadores inmigrantes en Estados Unidos a partir de ese análisis y también por qué estas cifras son tan importantes en este momento… Ver nota completa EE.UU.–MÉXICO Urgente una estrategia y un plan de apoyo económico para migrantes mexicanos Por Pilar Lozano Mac Donald El Universal – 21 de abril de 2020 Se imaginan: ¿Estar en otro país, lejos de la familia y amigos, sin documentos, sin seguro médico ni de desempleo, sin trabajo, sin dinero para alimentos, renta y pago de servicios, ningún apoyo del gobierno y sin posibilidades de salir a buscar empleo por la grave situación de salud que se vive en Estados Unidos provocado el COVID-19? Es la situación de vulnerabilidad de los migrantes frente a las autoridades norteamericanas y sin la protección de su gobierno. Son la población aún más vulnerable por las consecuencias económicas y sociales de la respuesta que se ha dado a esta emergencia. En 2018, había en Estados Unidos 12.3 millones de personas nacidas en México y 26.2 millones son mexicanos de segunda y tercera generación… Ver nota completa LATINOAMÉRICA Sistemas de integración en AL y el Caribe, un fracaso Se mostraron como meras burocracias frente a la pandemia, opinan Por José Meléndez El Universal – 21 de abril de 2020 Un abundante listado de estructuras de la burocracia interamericana—OEA, CELAC, Prosur, SICA, MERCOSUR, Caricom, AEC, Alianza del Pacífico o ALBA-TCP y su andamiaje paralelo— quedó rebasado por el impacto de la pandemia del Covid-19 en América Latina y El Caribe en el primer cuatrimestre de 2020 […] “La inutilidad de ciertos organismos internacionales es pasmosa y vergonzosa” y quedaron en evidencia “gracias” a la enfermedad, dijo el analista político costarricense Pablo Barahona, ex embajador de Costa Rica en la Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA)… Ver nota completa INTERNACIONAL ACNUR: es necesario vigilar los daños que podría provocar la pandemia del coronavirus sobre los derechos humanos y los derechos de los refugiados a largo plazo ACNUR México – 22 de abril de 2020 La pandemia del coronavirus ha agravado la situación de las personas que huyen de la guerra, el conflicto y la persecución. Mientras los países luchan por proteger a sus poblaciones y sus economías, las normas fundamentales de los derechos humanos y del derecho de los refugiados se encuentran en riesgo. “Los principios centrales de la protección de las personas refugiadas están a prueba, pero no se les debería negar la seguridad y la protección a las personas que se han visto obligadas a huir del conflicto y la persecución con el pretexto de la respuesta al virus, o como un efecto secundario de esta respuesta”, dijo Filippo Grandi, Alto Comisionado de la ONU para los Refugiados. “Asegurar la salud pública y proteger a las personas refugiadas no son mutuamente excluyentes. Esto no representa un dilema. Tenemos que lograr ambas…” Ver artículo completo EE.UU.–MÉXICO Acerca coronavirus a López Obrador y Trump Los mandatarios evitan tensiones y sus coincidencias sobre el virus parecen responder en parte a su deseo de reactivar sus economías Por The Associated Press El Diario – 22 de abril de 2020 La pandemia del Covid-19 pudo haber generado roces entre México y Estados Unidos, cuyos gobernantes están en las antípodas del espectro político y enfrentan la peor crisis de sus administraciones.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • May 21, 2019, Dear Speaker Pelosi, Leader Mccarthy
    May 21, 2019, Dear Speaker Pelosi, Leader McCarthy, Chairman Nadler, and Ranking Member Collins, We, the undersigned national, state, and local education, civil and human rights, LGBTQ+, labor, national security, faith, grassroots, and immigrants’ rights organizations, write to express our support for the American Dream and Promise Act as it goes before the House Judiciary Committee for markup. The legislation would put immigrant youth known as Dreamers and long-time beneficiaries of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) on a roadmap to citizenship. Over the past two years, the Trump administration has taken steps to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and strip status from nearly every individual with TPS and all of those with DED. Only a small number of preliminary injunctions prevent these individuals from facing the prospect of detention and deportation. The administration’s actions are inflicting enormous pain and uncertainty on more than a million people—not to mention their families and their communities who face an impending separation crisis. These individuals live in every state and every congressional district. They are our classmates and our teachers, our coworkers and our employers. They worship with us and help to keep us safe. They contribute to our great nation in myriad ways. The average DACA recipient came to the country at age six, while the average TPS holder has been in the country for 22 years. Between them, they have nearly 500,000 U.S. citizen children, not to mention many hundreds of thousands more U.S. citizen parents, spouses, and siblings, all of whom are suffering already and will suffer still more if the Trump administration is successful in ending their protections.
    [Show full text]
  • Not a National Security Crisis
    RESEARCH RESEARCH REPORT REPORT AP Photo/Eric Gay NOT A NATIONAL SECURITY CRISIS The U.S.-Mexico Border and Humanitarian Concerns, Seen from El Paso By Maureen Meyer, Adam Isacson, and Carolyn Scorpio OCTOBER 2016 Contrary to popular and political rhetoric about a national security crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, evidence suggests a potential humanitarian—not security—emergency. This report, based on research and a field visit to El Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico in April 2016, provides a dose of reality by examining one of the most emblematic of the U.S.- Mexico border’s nine sectors, one that falls within the middle of the rankings on migration, drug seizures, violence, and human rights abuses. NOT A NATIONAL SECURITY CRISIS The U.S.-Mexico Border and Humanitarian Concerns, Seen from El Paso TABLE OF CONTENTS KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 IMPORTANT CHANGES IN THE EL PASO SECTOR ...................................................... 12 NOTEWORTHY EFFORTS ON THE MEXICAN SIDE ................................................... 28 AREAS OF CONCERN ........................................................................................................................................32 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................................................48
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalizing Asylum-Seekers
    ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK: CRIMINALIZING ASYLUM-SEEKERS Thomas M. McDonnell* and Vanessa H. Merton** ABSTRACT In nearly three years in office, President Donald J. Trump’s war against immigrants and the foreign-born seems only to have intensified. Through a series of Executive Branch actions and policies rather than legislation, the Trump Administration has targeted immigrants and visitors from Muslim-majority countries, imposed quotas on and drastically reduced the independence of Immigration Court Judges, cut the number of refugees admitted by more than 80%, cancelled DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), and stationed Immigration Customs and Enforcement (“ICE”) agents at state courtrooms to arrest unauthorized immigrants, intimidating them from participating as witnesses and litigants. Although initially saying that only unauthorized immigrants convicted of serious crimes would be prioritized for deportation, the Trump Administration has implicitly given ICE officers carte blanche to arrest unauthorized immigrants anytime, anywhere, creating a climate of fear in immigrant communities. Particularly disturbing is the targeting of asylum-seekers, employing the criminal justice system and the illegal entry statute in the “zero tolerance policy.” Under this policy, children, including toddlers, are seized and languish for months and years separate from * Professor of Law, Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, B.A., J.D., Fordham University. We thank Professor Karen Musalo, UC Hastings College of the Law, for commenting on a draft of this article. I thank my administrative assistant, Judy Jaeger, and my research assistants, Amanda Bertan-Chung and Julie Yedowitz. I also thank my wife, Kathryn Judkins McDonnell, for her constant support. My contribution to this article is dedicated to my daughter, Mary Louise Waldron, whose commitment to social justice is inspiring.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Enforcement Developments Since 1993 and How to Change CBP
    Border Enforcement Developments Since 1993 and How to Change CBP Daniel E. Martínez The University of Arizona Josiah Heyman The University of Texas at El Paso Jeremy Slack The University of Texas at El Paso August 24, 2020 CMS Essays, https://cmsny.org/publications/border-enforcement-developments-since-1993- and-how-to-change-cbp/ Executive Summary Enforcement along the US-Mexico border has intensified significantly since the early 1990s. Social scientists have documented several consequences of border militarization, including increased border-crosser deaths, the killing of more than 110 people by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents over the past decade, and expanded ethno-racial profiling in southwestern communities by immigration authorities. Less attention has been paid to the pervasive and routine mistreatment migrants experience on a daily basis in CBP custody. This paper traces major developments in border enforcement to three notable initiatives: the “prevention-through-deterrence” strategy, the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Consequence Delivery System, initiated in 2011. Despite the massive buildup in enforcement, CBP has operated with little transparency and accountability to the detriment of migrants. The paper provides an overview of the findings of nongovernmental organizations and social scientists regarding migrant mistreatment while in CBP custody. It then highlights important shifts in migration patterns over the past decade, as well as changes in border enforcement efforts during the Trump administration. It discusses how these transformations affect migrants’ everyday encounters with CBP officials. The paper concludes by providing specific recommendations for improving CBP conduct. Its core theme is the need to emphasize and inculcate lessons of appropriate police behavior, civil rights, and civil liberties in training and recruiting agents and in setting responsibilities of supervisors and administrators.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Case 2:17-cv-05111-JFW-JPR Document 98-8 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1435 1 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Manuel A. Abascal (Bar No. 171301) 2 [email protected] 3 Wayne S. Flick (Bar No. 149525) [email protected] 4 James H. Moon (Bar No. 268215) [email protected] 5 Robin A. Kelley (Bar No. 287696) 6 [email protected] Faraz R. Mohammadi (Bar No. 294497) 7 [email protected] 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 100 8 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 Telephone: +1.213.485.1234 9 Facsimile: +1.213.891.8763 10 AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL 11 Melissa Crow (pro hac vice pending) RIGHTS [email protected] Baher Azmy (pro hac vice pending) 12 Karolina Walters (pro hac vice pending) [email protected] 13 [email protected] Ghita Schwarz (pro hac vice pending) Kathryn Shepherd (pro hac vice pending) [email protected] 14 [email protected] Angelo Guisado (pro hac vice pending) 1331 G Street, NW, Suite 200 [email protected] 15 Washington, DC 20005 666 Broadway, 7th Floor Telephone: +1.202.507.7523 New York, NY 10012 16 Facsimile: +1.202.742.5619 Telephone: +1.212.614.6464 17 Facsimile: +1.212.614.6499 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 Al Otro Lado, Inc., et al., Case No.: 2:17-cv-5111 JFW (JPRx) 22 Hon. John F. Walter (Courtroom 7A) Plaintiffs, 23 DECLARATION OF DIEGO v. INIGUEZ-LOPEZ IN SUPPORT OF 24 PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS 25 Elaine C.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of Hope and Resilience Migrant: Stories of Hope and Resilience Is a Joint Project with the Hope Border Institute and the Kino Border Initiative
    $2.99 Stories of Hope and Resilience Migrant: Stories of Hope and Resilience is a joint project with The Hope Border Institute and The Kino Border Initiative. Hope Border Institute (HBI) is an independent grassroots community organization working in the El Paso- Ciudad Juárez-Las Cruces region, that seeks to bring the perspective of Catholic social teaching to bear on the social realities unique to our region. Through a robust program of research, reflection, leadership development, advocacy and action, HBI develops and aligns the border’s community leaders engaged in the work of justice from across the Mexico-US border to deepen solidarity across borders and transform our region. The Kino Border Initiative (KBI) is a binational organization that works in the area of migration and is located in Nogales, Arizona and Nogales, Sonora, Mexico. The KBI was inaugurated in January of 2009 by six organi- zations from the United States and Mexico: The California Province of the Society of Jesus, Jesuit Refugee Ser- vice/USA, the Missionary Sisters of the Eucharist, the Mexican Province of the Society of Jesus, the Diocese of Tucson and the Archdiocese of Hermosillo. The KBI’s vision is to help make humane, just, workable migration between the U.S. and Mexico a reality. Its mission is to promote US/Mexico border and immigration policies that affirm the dignity of the human person and a spirit of bi-national solidarity through direct humanitarian assistance and accompaniment with migrants, social and pastoral education with communities on both sides of the border, and participation in collaborative networks that engage in research and advocacy to transform local, regional, and national immigration policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley of Caged Immigrants: Punishment, Protest, and the Rise of the Port Isabel Detention Center1
    VALLEY OF CAGED IMMIGRANTS: PUNISHMENT, PROTEST, AND THE RISE OF THE PORT ISABEL DETENTION CENTER1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n33.09 Jennifer Cullison2 Orcid ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-1143 University of Nevada, USA [email protected] How to cite this article: Cullison, J. (2020). Valley of Caged Immigrants: Punishment, Protest, and the Rise of the Port Isabel Detention Center. Tabula Rasa, 33, 1-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n33.09 Received: June 23, 2018 Accepted: August 27, 2018 Abstract: Despite popular understanding of immigrant detention in the US as effectively nonexistent before the 1980s, in reality the practice grew significantly over the early postwar era and especially in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley (RGV). Immigrant detention in the RGV became vital in the expanding network of the INS, other federal agencies, and for-profit institutions called here the Border Industrial Complex. Indeed, beginning in 1961 with its first full-fledged, permanent immigrant detention center, the Port Isabel Detention Center (PIDC), South Texas became a major piece of the Border Industrial Complex in its work to control, immobilize, and banish border crossers. Over the early postwar period, immigrant caging (or immigrant detention and immigrant incarceration based on immigration legal code) in the RGV transitioned from a temporary, situational response to a perpetual crisis. With growing Congressional support for immigration enforcement, by the 1970s, not only the INS, but also the US Marshals Service and the US Bureau of Prisons had greater numbers of people caged per immigration legal code. 1 This article is a product of a dissertation research project on the expansion of immigrant detention in the US, titled “The Growth of Immigrant Caging in Postwar America: National Immigration Policy Choices, Regional Shifts Toward Greater Carceral Control, and Continuing Legal Resistance in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents: Appendices
    TABLE OF CONTENTS: APPENDICES Appendix A - Standing Orders of IJs in the El Paso Service Processing Center IJ Abbott A1a: Evidence Standing Order for Asylum/Withholding/CAT ................................................... 2 A1b: Bond Hearing Standing Order ........................................................................................... 4 A1c: Evidence Standing Order for Cancellation of Removal/Non-LPR .................................... 7 A1d(i): Telephonic Appearance Standing Order ....................................................................... 9 A1d(ii): Historical Version of Telephonic Appearance Standing Order .................................. 12 A1d(iii): Redacted Order Denying Motion for Telephonic Appearance .................................. 15 IJ Pleters A2a: Evidence Standing Order for Asylum/Withholding of Removal/CAT ............................. 17 A2b: Bond Hearing Standing Order ......................................................................................... 19 IJ Tuckman A3a: Evidence Standing Order for Asylum/Withholding of Removal/CAT ............................. 24 A3b: Bond Hearing Standing Order ......................................................................................... 26 Appendix B: - Sworn Statements of Practitioners B1: Sworn Statement of Anonymous #1 ................................................................................. 32 B2: Sworn Statement of Alexandra Bachan ............................................................................ 42 B3: Sworn
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Newsletter and MHRP Annual Report
    Volume 13 | Issue 1 | Summer 2019 2019 Summer Newsletter and 2018-19 Migration & Human Rights Project Annual Report in this issue Letter from the Co-directors 2 About Us 3 Center News & Notes 4 MHRP Annual Report 5 Student Awards 13 Center Events 14 Fall 2019 Events 20 www.bc.edu/humanrights 1 Center for Human Rights and International Justice | Summer 2019 Letter from the Co-directors Dear Friends, law. These include a “Remain in Mexico” fought for and upheld in our courts of law. Read policy, long delays and practices of “turn- more about our recent celebration with García We write in the midst of unprecedented Trump ing back” potential asylum seekers at US of this long journey to justice elsewhere in this administration assaults on basic norms of fair- ports of entry, leaving asylum seekers in report. ness, decency, and humanity in immigration perilous conditions in Mexican border cit- enforcement and beyond. As many are now ies such as Ciudad Juárez, where they are Center co-director M. Brinton Lykes also saw aware, brutally harsh, cynical tactics are espe- easily targeted for theft and violence while the publication of a book this year, co-authored cially acute at and near the borders of the US, they endure significant wait times for a with York University Professor Alison Crosby, but threats of major deportation operations and hearing date in the US. The administration which is a product of their partnership in the the internal expansion of “expedited removal” is also pursuing a patently illegal – and his- Center’s Gender and Reparations: Understand- have also caused fear and stress in communi- torically peculiar – effort to turn Guatema- ing Women’s Struggles for Justice, Histori- ties throughout the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report in English
    HUMAN RIGHTS “We Can’t Help You Here” US Returns of Asylum Seekers to Mexico WATCH “We Can’t Help You Here” US Returns of Asylum Seekers to Mexico Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-37465 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JULY 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-37465 “We Can’t Help You Here” US Returns of Asylum Seekers to Mexico Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 5 To the US Department of Homeland Security ............................................................................. 5 To the US Department of Justice ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-09 Foia
    Closed between 09/01/2017 and 09/30/2017 Organization Received Date Request Description Request ID Requester Name The Desert Sun 11/21/2016 records showing the number of detainers each law enforcement 2017‐ICFO‐06942 (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) facility in the country has received between FY 2010 and FY 2016, including how many involved individuals with a level 1, level 2, level 3 conviction or no conviction Political Science and Legal Studies Board NW 11/2/2016 all materials produced, received, or maintained by any 2017‐ICFO‐04968 (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Unive component of ICE related to (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) request for ICE contracts with Akima Global Services (see request for specific details) - 8/8/2016 1) the number of individuals submitted to IDENT under Secure 2016‐ICFO‐50770 (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Communities by county and month of arrest from 2008 through 2013; 2) matched using IDENT under Secure Communities by county and month of arrest from 2008 through 2013; 3) the number of individuals detained under Secure Communities by county and month of arrest from 2008 through 2013; 4) the number of individuals removed or returned under Secure Communities by county and month of arrest from 2008 through 2013; 5) the number of individuals detained under any ICE program by county and month of arrest from 2008 through 2013; and 6) the number of individuals removed or returned under any ICE program by county and month of arrest from 2008 through 2013 NBC Bay Area News 10/13/2016 the following records maintained by your office: -List of all OPT 2017‐ICFO‐02278 (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (Optional Practical Training) and CPT (Curricular Practical Training) placements for all students at the following SEVP universities from 2012 school year to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Border Buildup
    Beyond the Border Buildup Security and Migrants Along the U.S.-Mexico Border by Adam Isacson and Maureen Meyer with contributions from José Moreno Mena, María Dolores Paris Pombo, José María Ramos García, and George Withers WOLA Washington office on Latin america April 2012 Table of Contents U.S.-Mexico Border Map 0 Frequently Used Acronyms 1 Introduction 3 The New Border Context 4 Terrorism 4 “Spillover” of Violence 5 Drugs 7 Changes in Migrant Flows, Routes, and Crossing Methods 9 Border Security Strategies 13 In the United States: Multiple Plans 13 In Mexico 15 The U.S. Security Buildup 16 A Panoply of Agencies 17 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 18 Department of Justice (DOJ) 22 Department of Defense (DOD) 23 U.S. States and Local Jurisdictions 26 Local Security: The Case of El Paso 27 Cooperation with Mexico 28 Issues Raised by the Security Buildup 32 Migrants and the New Border Context 35 The Situation of Migrants in Mexico 35 The Situation of Migrants in the United States 40 Conclusion 46 Recommendations 47 For the United States 47 For Mexico 49 Endnotes 51 U.S.-MEXICO BORDER MAP Underlying Map Source: Department of Geography, Arizona State University WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA | APRIL 2012 1 Frequently Used Acronyms ATEP: U.S. Alien Transfer Removal Program. ATF: U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (under DOJ). BEST: U.S. Border Enforcement Security Task Forces (under ICE, which is under DHS). BORFIC: U.S. Border Field Intelligence Center (under Border Patrol, which is under CBP, which is under DHS).
    [Show full text]