NDA Strategy 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NDA Strategy 2021 Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Strategy Effective from March 2021 Cleaning up the UK’s earliest nuclear sites, caring for people and the environment Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Strategy Effective from March 2021 Strategy presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 2 of the Energy Act 2004. Strategy presented to Scottish Parliament pursuant to Schedule 2 of the Energy Act 2004. March 2021 SG/2021/48 NDA Strategy 3 © Nuclear Decommissioning Authority copyright (2021) This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at: NDA Strategy Herdus House Westlakes Science & Technology Park Moor Row Cumbria CA24 3HU ISBN 978-1-5286-2451-0 CCS0321136060 03/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Some images supplied courtesy of site licence companies. Every effort is taken to ensure the accuracy of material or images produced or used by the NDA. However, the NDA cannot guarantee that the images shown will always be current, accurate or complete and does not warrant or endorse the accuracy or completeness of the images. © Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2021) 4 Contents Preface 7 8.7 Asset Management 111 Case Study: Quality and Continuous 1.0 Introduction 9 Improvement (First Generation Magnox Storage Pond) 112 1.1 Background 9 8.8 Supply Chain 114 1.2 Current Context 14 Case Study: Supply Chain Small and 1.3 Funding 17 Medium Enterprise Engagement 116 2.0 Our Approach to Strategy 18 8.9 Information Governance 117 Case Study: Higher Activity Waste 2.1 Strategic Themes and Topics 18 Package Records 119 2.2 Strategy Management 19 8.10 Socio-Economics 120 2.3 Lessons from Strategy (2016) 21 Case Study: Scrabster Harbour (Caithness) 123 3.0 Our Evolving Strategy 22 8.11 Public and Stakeholder Engagement 124 8.12 Transport and Logistics 127 4.0 Site Decommissioning and Remediation 26 Case Study: Consolidation of Spent Fuel and Nuclear Materials 130 Case Study: Ponds and Silos at Sellafield 31 8.13 International Relations 131 4.1 Decommissioning 32 Case Study: Developing Relationships Case Study: Timing of the Magnox in Japan 133 Reactor Decommissioning Strategy 35 4.2 Land Quality Management 37 4.3 Site Interim and End States 39 9.0 Non-NDA Liabilities 134 Case Study: Optimising Site End States 42 Case Study: Treatment and Storage of 4.4 Land Use 44 Atomic Weapons Establishment Higher Activity Waste 136 5.0 Spent Fuels 46 5.1 Spent Oxide Fuel 50 10.0 Information on the NDA group 138 5.2 Spent Magnox Fuel 52 5.3 Spent Exotic Fuel 54 References 159 The Vision: Nuclear Safeguards 56 Appendices 162 6.0 Nuclear Materials 58 A Summary of the Integrated Impact Assessment 162 6.1 Plutonium 60 B Summary of Expected Expenditure 6.2 Uranium 63 and Income 164 Case Study: Export of High Enriched Uranium in Support of Medical Isotope Production 65 Glossary 165 7.0 Integrated Waste Management 68 Abbreviations 168 7.1 Radioactive Waste 72 Case Study: Thermal Treatment 79 Case Study: Packaging 79 The Vision: The Disposal Capacity Needed to Complete the Mission 80 Key 7.2 Liquid and Gaseous Discharges 82 7.3 Non-Radioactive Waste 84 Glossary terms appear in italics (SOxx) refer to the Strategic Outcomes as reported 8.0 Critical Enablers 86 in the Mission Progress Report 8.1 Health, Safety, Environment and Wellbeing 89 Case Study: Mental Health and Wellbeing 92 8.2 Sustainability 93 8.3 Security and Resilience 96 8.4 Cyber Security 98 Case Study: Exercise Purple Lumi 100 8.5 Research, Development and Innovation 101 Case Study: Innovation 104 The Vision: Encouraging Innovation 105 8.6 People 106 Case Study: Nucleargraduates 109 NDA Strategy 5 Our Estate 17 nuclear sites across the UK 1,046 hectares of designated land on nuclear licensed sites 15,000 employees across the estate 800+ buildings to be demolished 6 Preface In 2005, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) was established as a Non-Departmental Public Body under the Energy Act (2004) (ref 1). Our purpose is to clean up the UK’s earliest that evolution and improvement and since the nuclear sites safely, securely and cost effectively. publication of our last Strategy in 2016 (ref 3), Doing this with care for our people, communities we have advanced our thinking in some and the environment is at the heart of our work. important areas including site decommissioning Our strategy is founded on our commitment to and remediation and integrated waste overcoming the challenges of nuclear clean-up management. In this Strategy, we present the and decommissioning, leaving our sites safe and challenges, our proposed direction over the next ready for their next use. strategy period and the actions we are planning to progress our mission. We work with UK government and the devolved administrations to ensure their policies are Implementation of this Strategy is dependent reflected in our strategy and implemented at upon continual assessment of affordability our sites. Our sponsoring department is the and value for money as well as business case Department for Business and Industrial Strategy approvals at the time of implementation. Delivery (BEIS), with additional obligations to Scottish of the Strategy will benefit from a simpler NDA ministers for matters affecting Scotland. group operating model, founded on alignment and collaboration, and focus on value for money. Our clean-up mission covers 17 sites, 14 We recognise that, in the short to medium-term, in England and Wales as designated by the the COVID-19 pandemic will put significant Secretary of State for BEIS and 3 in Scotland pressure on public sector finances which may also designated jointly by the Scottish ministers. impact on our future funding settlements and We have a range of supplementary functions consequentially mean we need to review our including supply chain development, research strategic and delivery priorities. and development, skills, socio-economic support for local communities, and stakeholder Social responsibility is important to us and engagement. We are also responsible for is fundamental to our strategy. We can only implementing both geological disposal and the succeed by working collaboratively with our site UK nuclear industry’s Solid Low Level Waste communities, regulators and other stakeholders Strategy (ref 2) and we perform certain advisory including UK government and the devolved functions for the Secretary of State. administrations. We seek to involve our stakeholders in open dialogue and recognise The Energy Act (2004) (ref 1) requires us to their views as an important part of our strategic review and publish our Strategy every 5 years considerations. but we continually develop our strategy to reflect our latest understanding enabling us to make progress in the most appropriate way. This Strategy, our fourth iteration, continues NDA Strategy 7 How we communicate our strategy and report progress ENGAGE WITH OUR STAKEHOLDERS REPORT PROGRESS NDA Strategy Mission Progress Report Last Published: March 2021 Last Published: July 2019 12 week public consultation Provides our stakeholders with a clear and concise Describes how we will deliver our mission, story of NDA mission progress since 2005, that ensuring that the UK’s nuclear legacy sites are demonstrates delivery of our strategic themes and decommissioned and cleaned up safely, securely, outcomes as explained in our Strategy. cost-effectively and in ways that protect people and Covers 100+ years. the environment. Published every 5 years. Energy Act requirement. Covers 100+ years. Published every 5 years. NDA Mid-Year Performance Report Last Published: February 2021 Provides a progress update against Business Plan activities and incorporates the NDA group targets. Published every year. NDA Business Plan Last Published: April 2020 8 week public consultation Describes key activities across the group over the next 3 years that align to our strategic outcomes and details the funding available for the next year. Energy Act requirement. Covers 3 years. Published every year. NDA Annual Report and Accounts Last Published: July 2020 Describes achievements and spending. Reports against Business Plan activities and contains an overall progress update against our mission. Energy Act requirement. Covers 1 year. Published every year. 8 1.0 Introduction Our mission is to deliver safe, secure, sustainable and publicly acceptable solutions to the challenge of nuclear clean-up and waste management. 1.1 Background The UK nuclear industry has evolved since the Services (Social Value) Act 2012 (ref 6) and the Second World War, responding to UK government Cabinet Office Procurement Policy Note PPN 06/20 policy requirements related to civil nuclear energy (ref 7) which require us to evaluate positive social, and defence. This has resulted in a legacy of sites economic and environmental impacts i.e. achieving and facilities as well as a number of operational social value through our procurement activities. nuclear power and fuel cycle plants. In our previous Strategies (ref 3,4,5) we signalled The Energy Act (2004) (ref 1) created the NDA to significant changes to our strategic approach and take responsibility for decommissioning the legacy some of these changes have already transformed sites that make up our estate, which contain many delivery across the group and some will do so in the unique and difficult nuclear decommissioning future. Specifically, in our 2016 Strategy (ref 3), we: challenges. The risks and hazards the NDA • reiterated our relentless focus on reducing manages are amongst the most challenging risk and hazard across the NDA estate.
Recommended publications
  • Download a Copy
    Cover image: Courtesey of EDF Energy — www.edfenergy.com/energy CONTENTS... 1 AT A GLANCE... 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 4 BENEFITS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 5 WHAT THE PUBLIC THINK... 6 HOW NUCLEAR CREATES ENERGY... 7 HOW A REACTOR WORKS... 8 THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE... 9 MANAGING WASTE... 10 RADIATION EXPLAINED... 12 NUCLEAR AROUND THE WORLD... 14 UK NUCLEAR SITES... 16 NUCLEAR NEW BUILD... 17 NEW BUILD IN NUMBERS... 18 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE... 19 DECOMMISSIONING... 20 CAREERS IN NUCLEAR... 21 FUTHER INFORMATION... AT A GLANCE... Nuclear is a major part of our energy mix. Today it accounts for 21% of electricity generated in the UK and has been providing secure low carbon electricity for over 60 years. Low carbon energy, including There are 15 nuclear power and renewables, nuclear power account for almost 51% of the reactors operating UK’s generation electricity mix across eight sites in the UK In 2016 nuclear energy avoided 22.7 million metric tonnes of CO2 emissions in the UK BEIS,Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2018 That’s equivalent to taking around a third of all cars in the UK off the road Civil nuclear contributes over £6 billion to the jobs in the UK civil nuclear sector UK economy as much as aerospace manufacturing 12,159 Women in civil nuclear 1,981 People on apprenticeships Three quarters of the public 914 believe nuclear should be part People on graduate schemes of the clean energy mix Jobs Map figures generated from participating NIA members 1 This simple timeline charts some of the key people, events and legislation A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY..
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Decommissioning (LT) Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plan in Lithuania
    Security and Defence Nuclear Decommissioning (LT) Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plan in Lithuania Challenge (depending on the waste category), including the completion of the waste management COUNCIL REGULATION The decommissioning of a nuclear installation such as infrastructure where necessary; establishing the nuclear a power plant or research reactor is the final step in 4. implementation of the building demolition decommissioning assistance its lifecycle. It involves activities from shutdown and programme; programme of the Ignalina removal of nuclear material to the environmental nuclear power plant in Lithuania 5. obtaining the decommissioning licence once Unit 1 restoration of the site. The whole process is long and and Unit 2 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant are and repealing Regulation (EU) No complex: it typically takes 20 to 30 years. It is also 1369/2013 defueled; fraught with technical, technological and financiall 6. downgrading of radiological hazards. Council Regulation (EU) 2021/101 challenges. The EU legal framework sets the highest safety standards for all activities regarding nuclear Furthermore, knowledge and experience gained and Period of Application installations, including their decommissioning. lessons learnt under the programme with regard to 2021–2027 the decommissioning process shall be disseminated In application of its Act of Accession to the Union, among Union stakeholders, thus enhancing the EU Lithuania anticipated the shutdown of the two nuclear added value of the programme. reactors in Ignalina within the agreed deadlines (2004 and 2009). RELEVANT WEBSITE FOR MORE Actions INFORMATION The Union committed to provide financial support for The actions to be funded by the Ignalina programme https://europa.eu/!bC66CU the decommissioning, in accordance with approved plans, while keeping the highest level of safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Industry Council Proposals to Government for a Sector Deal
    The Nuclear Sector Deal Nuclear Industry Council Proposals to Government for a Sector Deal l Foreword The UK’s civil nuclear sector is amongst the most advanced in the world. Our global leadership status has been earnt through a record across the entire nuclear lifecycle – from enrichment, through fuel production, generation, operation, new build, research and decommissioning – and increasingly enhanced by our world class regulatory system as the country’s new build programme takes shape. Our sector is an economic powerhouse – currently equivalent in scale to aerospace manufacturing – providing tens of thousands of highly skilled jobs, driving growth in diverse regions across the UK. Our world leading research and development puts us at the forefront of waste and decommissioning, with UK companies well placed to benefit from opportunities in a global market worth £100bn. The existing fleet of nuclear power stations provides more than 20% of the UK’s electricity supply, and its low carbon, reliable baseload characteristics complement a changing energy system with a greater penetration of intermittent and variable renewable sources of generation. The combination of low carbon power sources has helped the UK reduce its carbon emissions, and will be vitally important to maintain that progress as both transport and heat become less carbon intensive, and more reliant on clean electricity in the future. The potential to build on that record is real, and the Nuclear Industry Council has worked under my leadership to present the opportunities for where greater collaboration by industry, with the right levels of facilitation from the government, can maximise that potential, and make a significant contribution to meeting the objectives set by the government in its Industrial Strategy white paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category
    小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC 1.DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体/海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software 2.Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Issue No. 7 September 2017
    NEWSLETTER September 2017 Issue no. 7 Nuclear Industry Group Newsletter September 2017 Contents Notes from the Chair ................................................................................... 3 IOP Group Officers Forum .......................................................................... 4 NIG Committee Elections ............................................................................ 6 Nuclear Industry Group Career Contribution Prize 2017 .......................... 7 Event – Gen IV Reactors by Richard Stainsby (NNL) ................................ 8 Event – Nuclear Security by Robert Rodger (NNL) and Graham Urwin (RWM) ......................................................................................................... 12 Event – The UK’s Nuclear Future by Dame Sue Ion ................................ 13 Event – Regulatory Challenges for Nuclear New Build by Mike Finnerty. .................................................................................................................... 15 Event – European Nuclear Young Generation Forum ............................. 18 Event – Nuclear Fusion, 60 Years on from ZETA by Chris Warrick (UKAEA), Kate Lancaster (York Plasma Institute), David Kingham (Tokamak Energy) and Ian Chapman (UKAEA) ....................................... 19 IOP Materials and Characterisation Group Meetings .............................. 25 “Brexatom” – the implications of the withdrawal for the UK from the Euratom Treaty. ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Progress with Reducing Risk at Sellafield
    A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: progress with reducing risk at Sellafield HC 1126 SESSION 2017–2019 20 JUNE 2018 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund, nationally and locally, have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. The C&AG does this through a range of outputs including value-for-money reports on matters of public interest; investigations to establish the underlying facts in circumstances where concerns have been raised by others or observed through our wider work; landscape reviews to aid transparency; and good-practice guides. Our work ensures that those responsible for the use of public money are held to account and helps government to improve public services, leading to audited savings of £734 million in 2016. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: progress with reducing risk at Sellafield Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 18 June 2018 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 15 June 2018 HC 1126 | £10.00 This report examines the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s progress with reducing risk and hazard at its largest and most hazardous site, Sellafield.
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Particles at Dounreay
    SEPTEMBER 20, 2007 | No. 660 HOT PARTICLES AT DOUNREAY The Dounreay nuclear complex, situated on a remote part of the north coast of Scotland, was once home to a variety of experimental nuclear facilities including two prototype fast breeder reactors, a reprocessing plant and a materials test reactor. Nearly all of these are now closed, but the legacy of their waste, pollution and accidents HOT PARTICLES AT DOUNREAY 1 lives on. One of the main areas of concern is the radioactive particles ILLEGAL TRAFFICKING: INCREASE found near the complex. The latest radioactive fragment found on INCIDENTS INVOLVING THEFT OR LOSS 2 Sandside beach is one of the hottest yet detected. SLEBOS CASE REVEALS FAILURE OF DUTCH AND EU NUCLEAR NON- (660.5826) WISE Amsterdam - The They entered the drains, which should PROLIFERATION POLICIES 4 particle of cesium-137 picked up during have carried only low-active waste a sweep of the beach on September 7 waster, either from the reprocessing RECORD URANIUM PRICE - WHAT was the third recovered since monitoring plant or from a controversial waste shaft. IS BEHIND AND WHAT ARE THE resumed on August 5 after a lengthy The highly radioactive particles were CONSEQUENCES 5 gap. This brings the legacy of pollution known as 'swarf' -the outside cladding from the nearby Dounreay plant to 97 from spent fuel assemblies which are cut HEAVY SUBSIDIES IN HEAVY used reactor fuel particles and an off at the very start of the reprocessing WATER: ECONOMICS OF NUCLEAR unidentified radioactive object. procedure to expose the fuel rods. These POWER IN INDIA 6 are some of the most highly radioactive After being taken back to a lab at the wastes from spent fuel reprocessing.
    [Show full text]
  • ALICE Electricity Sector Country Study UK
    ALICE Electricity Sector Country Study UK Christoph Wolfsegger IIASA February 2008 Content 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 2 2 History.................................................................................................................................. 3 3 Basic Data and Power Capacities ........................................................................................ 3 4 Electricity Generation in the UK ......................................................................................... 5 5 Plant loads and efficiencies..................................................................................................7 6 Consumption of electricity by sector ................................................................................... 8 7 Electricity prices for households and industries .................................................................. 9 8 Resource endowment......................................................................................................... 10 9 Regulatory Environment for RES-E .................................................................................. 14 10 Top manufactures and RES industries........................................................................... 16 11 Market Structure ............................................................................................................ 17 12 References.....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Vision: First in UK Power
    Operator: kevin Date: 02.06.2008 Server: studio 3 Set-up: Dave First Read/Revisions Our vision: First in UK power British Energy Group plc Annual Report and Accounts plc Annual ReportBritish Energy Group and Accounts 2007/08 British Energy Group plc GSO Business Park East Kilbride G74 5PG United Kingdom Registered in Scotland Number 270184 Annual Report and Accounts 2007/08 MM60056005 BBEE CCover.inddover.indd 1 99/6/08/6/08 007:24:147:24:14 Operator: kevin Date: 02.06.2008 Server: studio 3 Set-up: Dave First Read/Revisions British Energy is the lowest carbon emitter of the major electricity generators in the United Kingdom and the only low carbon baseload generator. BUSINESS SUMMARY Our Power Stations 01 Highlights 1 02 Our Strategy Torness Two advanced gas-cooled reactors 03 Key Performance Indicators 2 Hartlepool 04 Chairman’s Statement Two advanced gas-cooled reactors 3 Eggborough DIRECTORS’ REPORT – BUSINESS REVIEW Four coal-fi red units 06 Chief Executive’s Business Review 4 Sizewell B 14 Financial Review One pressurised water reactor 5 28 Corporate Social Responsibility ' Dungeness B / Two advanced gas-cooled reactors 6 Hinkley Point B DIRECTORS’ REPORT – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 32 Board of Directors Two advanced gas-cooled reactors 7 1 34 Corporate Governance Heysham ( Two advanced gas-cooled reactors 42 Remuneration Committee Report 8 Heysham 2 49 Other Statutory Information . Two advanced gas-cooled reactors - ) 9 Hunterston B FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Two advanced gas-cooled reactors 51 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of
    [Show full text]
  • Name Surname
    OFGEM FINANCIAL INFORMATION REPORTING YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2010 Under the Ofgem issued “Energy Supply Probe – Proposed Retail Market Remedies”, changes to generators and suppliers licences were made requiring licence holders to publish financial information to aid comparability of suppliers and generators. This “Segmental Reporting” satisfies Standard Licence Condition 19A of the Gas and Electricity Supply Licences and Standard Licence Condition 16B of the Electricity Generation Licence. EDF Energy (UK) Ltd and its subsidiaries (“EDF Energy”) operate through 3 operational business units supported by corporate services. These are “Energy Sourcing and Customer Supply”, ”Nuclear Generation”, “Nuclear New Build” and “Corporate Steering Functions and Company Shared Services & Integration”. The principal activities of these business units and support services are: Energy Sourcing and Customer Supply (ESCS): the provision and supply of electricity and gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers, the provision of services relating to energy, including purchasing of fuel for power generation and the generation of electricity; Nuclear Generation (NG): the generation of electricity through its fleet of nuclear power stations and Nuclear New Build (NNB): the development and construction of new nuclear power plants in the United Kingdom Corporate Steering Functions and Company Shared Services and Integration (CSF/CSSI): the provision of support services including HR, Finance, Property and IT, and the development of greater integration and synergies across the company where possible. The results of NNB are excluded from the scope of the Ofgem requirements hence NNB indirect and direct costs are not included in the analysis below. No consolidated statutory accounts have been prepared which include all UK operations of the EDF Energy group of companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power and Deregulated Electricity Markets: Lessons from British Energy
    Nuclear Power and Deregulated Electricity Markets: Lessons from British Energy EPRG Working Paper 0808 Simon Taylor Abstract The privatisation in 1996 and subsequent financial crisis in 2002 of the company British Energy plc shed some light on the difficulties of running a nuclear generator in a deregulated electricity market. This paper explains the causes of the company’s financial difficulties and argues that they do not amount to evidence that nuclear power cannot survive in liberalised markets. The causes of the financial crisis were complex and varied but nuclear power risks are not conceptually different from those successfully handled by markets in other sectors. In particular there is no reason in principle why new nuclear power stations should not be viable in a deregulated power market, assuming they are fundamentally cost competitive. Keywords Keywords: Electricity markets, nuclear power, risk management, corporate strategy, financial strategy, G PAPER privatisation. N JEL Classification G32, L94, Q48 Contact [email protected] Publication February 2008 EPRG WORKI www.electricitypolicy.org.uk 1. Introduction The British government privatised the more modern UK nuclear power stations in the form of the company British Energy plc in 1996. The company was unusual in being a wholly nuclear merchant power generator in a deregulated power market. It was also unusual in having full financial responsibility for its back end nuclear liabilities. The company initially raised output and profits and saw its shares rise strongly. But by 2002 it had run out of cash and had to get emergency financing from the government to avoid going into administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities
    Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities Response from the Engineering the Future alliance which includes: • The Royal Academy of Engineering • The Institution of Engineering and Technology • The Institution of Mechanical Engineers • The Institution of Chemical Engineers • The Engineering Council • Engineering UK House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology April 2011 Engineering the Future is pleased to have the opportunity to input into the Committee’s inquiry into UK nuclear research and development capability. As the alliance of the UK professional engineering institutions, Engineering the Future can draw upon a wide range of expertise in the nuclear field. It is clear that maintaining a strong nuclear research and development capability within the UK is important not only in its own right, but also in terms of positioning the UK as a credible partner in the international civil nuclear business and in maintaining the skills pipeline required by the industry in the UK for today and the future. This response has been coordinated by the Royal Academy of Engineering on behalf of Engineering the Future. Engineering the Future is a broad alliance of engineering institutions and bodies which represent the UK’s 450,000 professional engineers. We provide independent expert advice and promote understanding of the contribution that engineering makes to the economy, society and to the development and delivery of national policy. Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities The implications of future scenarios • What are the research and capability requirements of nuclear energy policy options, roadmaps and scenarios up to 2050? • What consideration is the Government giving to the UK’s R&D requirements to meet the policy objectives for nuclear energy both in the near term and longer term (to 2050)? Does more need to be done? • What research capabilities and commitments are required now to meet these future nuclear energy policies? 1.
    [Show full text]