DOCSLIB.ORG

Amencan Socialist Monthly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amencan Socialist Monthly amencan socialist monthly Symposium: Why Labor Should Support Roosevelt John L Lewis Why Labor Should Support the Socialist Party Norman Thomas The Left Wing at the Cleveland Convention Haim Kantorovitch For a National Constituent Assembly in France Marcel Fourrier Resolution on War "Fools Rush in ... Herbert Zam Jurisdictional Disputes and Labor Boards Joel Seidman Draft Program of the Spanish Socialist Party July 1936 vol. 5 no. 5 15 cents among our contributors Friedrich Adler Sidney Hertzberg Devere Allen Daniel W. Hoan Jack Altman Sidney Hook Angelica Balabanoff Darlington Hoopes Ernest Sutherland Bates Jessie Wallace Hughan Otto Bauer Edwin C. Johnson M. V. Baxter A. Jugow Anna Bercowitz Haim Kantorovitch David P. Berenberg Maynard C. Krueger Andrew J. Biemiller Leo Krzycki Hannah M. Biemiller Harry W. La idler Henry Black Margaret Lamont H. N. Brailsford Joseph P. Lash Roy Burt Harold J. Laski G. D. H. Cole David Lasser Albert Sprague Coolidge Alfred Baker Lewis Theodore Dan Edward Levinson Franz Daniel Arthur G. McDowell Max Delson Broadus Mitchell Robert Delson Reinhold Niebuhr S. A. DeWitt Kirby Page Ernest Doerfler Marceau Pivert Harold Draper Paul Porter Mary Dublin Joel Seidman Justus Ebert Clarence Senior Ernest Erber Tucker P. Smith Harold U. Faulkner Mark Starr David Felix Rose M. Stein Ben Gitlow George Streator Elsie Gluck Norman Thomas Albert Goldman Frank N. Trager James D. Graham Glen Trimble Edward Grove August Tyler Murray Gross Vincenzo Yacirca Alice Hanson John Wheelright Powers Hapgood Herbert Zam Marvin Halvorson Jean Zyromski amencan Table of Contents Symposium: Why Labor Should Support Roosevelt 2 John L. Lewis Why Labor Should Support the Socialist Party 3 Norman Thomas The Left Wing at the Cleveland Convention 8 Haim Kantorovitch For a National Constituent As- sembly in France 12 Marcel Fourrier Editorial Staff Resolution on War 15 "Fools Rush In—" 18 David P. Berenberg Herbert Zam Haim Kantorovitch Jurisdictional Disputes and Labor Boards 21 Devere Allen Joel Seidman Andrew J. Biemiller Draft Program of the Spanish Socialist Party 26 Roy Burt Book Reviews: Harry W. Laidler A Program for Modern America 29 by Harry W. Laidler Anna Bercowitz Reviewed by Harold U. Faulkner managing editor The Life of Friedrich Engeis 30 by Sustav Mayer Reviewed by David P. Berenberg July, 1936 Labor Fact Book III 32 Prepared by Labor Research Association Vol. 5 No. 5 Reviewed by David P. Berenberg OfFicial theoretical organ of the Socialist Party of the U. S. of America Published monthly at 21 East 17th Street, New York by the American Socialist Monthly Subscription One Dollar and Fifty Cents a Year Entered as second class matter, November 8th, 1934, at the post office at New York, New York, under the Act of March 3, 1879. Symposum: Why Labor Should Support Roosevelt John L Lewis HEN George L. Berry, Sidney Roosevelt has undertaken and accom- W Hillman, and others organized plished more for the workers than any Labor's Non-Partisan League, it was with other president in the history of the the firm conviction that labor should nation, and labor owes him a debt of give its full support to the re-election gratitude that can be liquidated only of President Roosevelt, and that this by casting its solid vote for him at the should be done without regard to po- coming election, regardless of party litical party affiliations. The American labels. labor movement is not a political par- The worker need only glance at the tisan institution, it rises above all party record to be convinced that he should lines. Its purpose is to achieve for the support President Roosevelt. Consider workers those things that rightfully be- what has been offered labor by the long to them. This can best be accom- present administration under the lead- plished through the force of united ac- ership of this great humanitarian: na- tion by the entire membership of the tional recovery, public works, nation- labor movement. Employers, capitalists wide relief, social security legislation, and big businessmen are organized to old-age pensions, unemployment insur- defeat President Roosevelt, if possible, ance, aid for the blind, elimination of and labor proposes to see to it that they injunctions in labor disputes, regulation do not succeed in this destructive effort. of the coal industry, end of cutthroat They have their American Liberty business policies and practices, right of League, United States Chamber of Com- labor to organize and bargain collective- merce and National Manufacturers As- ly through representatives of their own sociation through which to carry on choosing, and many other things. their campaign. These organizations are Through Labor's Non-Partisan League working with all the venom and bitter- these eloquent facts will be brought ness at their command. But Labor's forcefully to the attention of the voters Non-Partisan League, speaking in behalf of the country that they may have a of the many millions of men and women clear understanding of the vital neces- voters who earn their living with honest sity for the re-election of President toil, stands in the way of the success of Roosevelt. His great reforms must be these three reactionary organizations, retained and maintained, and others and shouts to them the warning, "You equally important are yet to be secured. shall not defeat President Roosevelt!" We are convinced that these purposes At this critical time labor must and can be accomplished by retaining Pres- will present a united front to the de- ident Roosevelt in the White House for structive forces of reaction. President another term. [2] II. Why Labor Should Support the Socialist Party Norman Thomas HIS article is written with special ful and genuine Farmer-Labor Party. reference to the brief and positive I suspect that Mr. Lewis' himself would statemenT t by John L. Lewis telling why admit that tl^pse cbridition^ ;were not labor should support Roosevelt. The met by an^^g.^o^lMt "that recent case I want to present is much bigger conference' a4:.•'tfeff^dtcl Morrison or by than the support, or failure to support, the program which it laid Sown. Th^re any individual. I am arguing for some- is therefore nothing except for those thing and not against someone. Least of who are convinced socialists to make all am I trying to raise the issue of the their own campaign. Anything else personal merits of myself or any other would be a kind of suicide, a confession candidate as against Mr. Roosevelt. that our socialist diagnosis and our so- Another word of preliminary explana- cialist program were wrong. Mr. Lewis, tion may be in order. I deeply appreciate I am sure, will not argue that Mr. the fact that Mr. Lewis has contributed Roosevelt has been a socialist or that a statement to the American Socialist he has offered the equivalent of Social- Monthly. It is a good omen for the fu- ism to the workers, and I suspect that ture, an evidence of a new point of view he is logical enough to agree that con- on his part, that he is willing to argue vinced socialists can scarcely support the case. I, in common with socialists with good conscience a man who is try- generally, am a hundred per cent behind ing to prolong capitalism by reforming the efforts of the Committee for Indus- it somewhat. trial Organization to organize the un- Mr. Lewis' position is that of an organized on industrial lines. We are ardent labor man who is not a socialist; very hopeful for the success of that who takes stock of the reforms of ad- movement. Some time we expect to vantage to labor which Roosevelt has work with the leaders of that movement brought about; who hopes for others and the rank and file on the political that he may bring about, and then de- front even as now we want to work with clares for the vital importance of re- them on the economic front. I am not electing Roosevelt. It will be observed taking a Socialist-Labor Party position that he has not declared for the Demo- as against a Farmer-Labor Party. I share cratic Party but only for Mr. Roosevelt. the hope of my comrades for the devel- However, he and his associates will opment of a Farmer-Labor Party that have to vote for Roosevelt and Garner, may be a genuine instrument in the and then, I suppose, pray whatever gods emancipation of the workers. there are that they may spare the Presi- The Party has declared itself officially dent's life so that we shall not get on what the conditions are for a success- Garner! Loose as political affiliation is [3] American Socialist Monthly in the United States it is impossible to had been violated? vote for Roosevelt without voting for Mr. Lewis, to his great credit, sent an the Democratic Party, and the Demo- investigator of his own into Arkansas. cratic Party is no vehicle for effective That investigator brought back a report reform. of the desperate plight of sharecroppers Even from a standpoint of mere im- and agricultural wofkers. In many ways mediate demands of a very moderate sort they are worse, not better off, under this the position of Mr. Lewis and his friends New Deal Administration. The bene- is open to question at two points: first, ficiaries of the agricultural program of as to the value of the things done or the New Deal have been the landowners, proposed by Mr. Roosevelt; second, as the great planters. Thousands of the to the danger which threatens the coun- workers have simply been driven com- try if Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography on World Conflict and Peace
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 097 246 SO 007 806 AUTHOR Boulding, Elise; Passions, J. Robert TITLE Bibliography on World Conflict and Peace. INSTITUTION American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C.; Consortium on Peace Research, Education, and Development, Boulder, Colo. PUB DATE Aug 74 NOT? 82p. AVAILABLE FROMBibliography Project, c/o Dorothy Carson, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80302 ($2.50; make checks payable to Boulding Projects Fund) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 BC Not Available from !DRS. PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; *Conflict Resolution; Development; Disarmament; Environment; *Futures (of Society); *Global Approach; Instructional Materials; International Education; international Law; International Organizations; *Peace; Political Science; Social Action; Systems Approach; *World Affairs IDENTIFIERS *Nonviolence ABSTRACT This bibliography is compiled primarily in response to the needs of teachers and students in the new field of conflict and peace studies, defined as the analysis of the characteristics of the total world social system which make peace more probable. The introduction includes some suggestions on how to use the bibliography, sources of literature on war/peace studies, and a request to users for criticisms and suggestions. Books, monographs, research reports, journal articles, or educational materials were included when they were:(1) related to conflict management at every social level,(2) relevant to nonviolence, and (3) classic statements in an academic specialization, such as foreign policy studies when of particular significance for conflict studies. A subject guide to the main categories of the bibliography lists 18 major topics with various numbered subdivisions. Th%. main body of the bibliography lists citations by author and keys this to the topic subdivisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Life and Politics in the United States of America in 19321)
    M. S. VENKATARAMANI SOME ASPECTS OF LIFE AND POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN 19321) To the present generation of young Americans the so-called two party system appears to be an almost unshakeable and permanent feature of the nation's polity. Several well-known American liberals (as, for instance, Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois and Walter Reuther, head of the powerful United Automobile Workers), who, in earlier years had reposed little faith in the Republican and Democratic parties, have gradually veered round to the view that the quest for reform must be pursued within the framework of the two major political parties. "Third parties" on the American scene have become virtually skele- tonized for various reasons and their plans and platforms receive scant notice at the hands of the media of mass communication. With the advent of good times during the war and post-war years, organizations advocating a radical reconstruction of the social and economic order have found a progressively shrinking audience. Radicalism among the intelligentsia has become a factor of minor significance. Will there be any important changes in such a state of affairs if the current business "recession" continues much longer or intensifies? Do "bad times" favor the growth of militant parties of protest and dissent? Few students of the American scene expect that in the foreseeable future there will be any widespread move away from the two traditional parties. It is interesting in this connection to examine the developments in the United States a quarter of a century ago when the nation was plunged into one of the most serious economic crises in its annals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyman Weintraub and William Goldberg Collection of Socialist Party Material, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt92902225 No online items Hyman Weintraub and William Goldberg Collection of Socialist Party Material, ca. 1924-1946 Processed by Manuscripts Division staff; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé and edited by Josh Fiala. UCLA Library Special Collections Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Hyman Weintraub and William 831 1 Goldberg Collection of Socialist Party Material, ca. 1924-1946 Descriptive Summary Title: Hyman Weintraub and William Goldberg Collection of Socialist Party Material, Date (inclusive): ca. 1924-1946 Collection number: 831 Creator: Weintraub, Hyman Extent: 26 boxes (13 linear ft.) Repository: University of California, Los Angeles. Library Special Collections. Los Angeles, California 90095-1575 Physical location: Stored off-site at SRLF. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Please contact the UCLA Library Special Collections Reference Desk for paging information. Restrictions on Access COLLECTION STORED OFF-SITE AT SRLF: Advance notice required for access. Restrictions on Use and Reproduction Property rights to the physical object belong to the UCLA Library Special Collections. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs. It is the responsibility of the researcher to determine who holds the copyright and pursue the copyright owner or his or her heir for permission to publish where The UC Regents do not hold the copyright. Provenance/Source of Acquisition Collection was originally assembled by Hyman Weintraub and William Goldberg.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Crisis in the Communist Party," by James Casey
    THE CRISIS in the..; COMMUNIST PARTY By James Casey Price IDc THREE ARROWS PRESS 21 East 17th Street New York City CHAPTER I THE PEOPlES FRONT AND MEl'tIBERSHIP The Communist Party has always prided itself on its «line." It has always boasted of being a "revolutionary work-class party with a Marxist­ Leninist line." Its members have been taught to believe that the party cannot be wrong at any time on any question. Nonetheless, today this Communist Party line has thrown the member­ ship of the Communist Party into a Niagara of Confusion. There are old members who insist that the line or program has not been changed. There are new members who assert just as emphatically that the line certainly has been changed and it is precisely because of this change that they have joined the party. Hence there is a clash of opinion which is steadily mov­ ing to the boiling point. Assuredly the newer members are correct in the first part of their contention that the basic program of the Communist Party has been changed. They are wrong when they hold that this change has been for the better. Today the Communist Party presents and seeks to carry out the "line" of a People's Front organization. And with its slogan of a People's Front, it has wiped out with one fell swoop, both in theory and in practice, the fundamental teachings of Karl Marx and Freidrick Engels. It, too, disowns in no lesser degree in deeds, if not yet in words, all the preachings and hopes of Nicolai Lenin, great interpretor of Marx and founder of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Zinn: 1922-2010 A.J
    July 12, 2010 Dear Friends, There is much to be excited about in the global movement for nonviolent social MUSTE change. In the enclosed letter, you can see News from the A.J. Muste Memorial Institute the results of your generous contributions to the Muste Institute. Thanks to your support, we have exceeded our fundraising expectations. But the grassroots peace and justice movement NOTES keeps expanding, and our resources aren’t enough to meet the needs. We received 100 VOL. 17, NUMBER 4 Summer 2010 applications for the June cycle of our Social Justice Fund! People of all ages and backgrounds are out there organizing, mobilizing, and Teaching Rebellion, from educating to build a better future. With your help, this movement can continue to Oaxaca to Wisconsin make real gains. Please give generously. And please help by Rachel Wallis communities, we could engage in a dia- us spread the word about the Muste In October 2008, with support from a logue about cross-movement organizing, Institute by passing this newsletter on to Muste Institute grant, CASA Collectives direct democracy, and human rights in your friends, colleagues, and family of Support, Solidarity and Action began the U.S. as well. In addition to sharing the members, or posting it at your local library. a two-month organizing tour across 15 testimonies from the book, the tour also states using the book Teaching Rebellion: featured an exhibit of photography docu- Sincerely, Stories from the Grassroots Mobilization in menting the movement. Oaxaca. The goal of the tour was to The tour began on October 10 in Los engage with U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid Prepared by David Kennaly Washington, D.C
    THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RARE BOOK AND SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DIVISION THE RADICAL PAMPHLET COLLECTION Finding aid prepared by David Kennaly Washington, D.C. - Library of Congress - 1995 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RARE BOOK ANtI SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DIVISIONS RADICAL PAMPHLET COLLECTIONS The Radical Pamphlet Collection was acquired by the Library of Congress through purchase and exchange between 1977—81. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 25 Number of items: Approx: 3465 Scope and Contents Note The Radical Pamphlet Collection spans the years 1870-1980 but is especially rich in the 1930-49 period. The collection includes pamphlets, newspapers, periodicals, broadsides, posters, cartoons, sheet music, and prints relating primarily to American communism, socialism, and anarchism. The largest part deals with the operations of the Communist Party, USA (CPUSA), its members, and various “front” organizations. Pamphlets chronicle the early development of the Party; the factional disputes of the 1920s between the Fosterites and the Lovestoneites; the Stalinization of the Party; the Popular Front; the united front against fascism; and the government investigation of the Communist Party in the post-World War Two period. Many of the pamphlets relate to the unsuccessful presidential campaigns of CP leaders Earl Browder and William Z. Foster. Earl Browder, party leader be—tween 1929—46, ran for President in 1936, 1940 and 1944; William Z. Foster, party leader between 1923—29, ran for President in 1928 and 1932. Pamphlets written by Browder and Foster in the l930s exemplify the Party’s desire to recruit the unemployed during the Great Depression by emphasizing social welfare programs and an isolationist foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Feasible Socialism
    ENDORSEMENT n. the occarion of the first nmtingr of the gov­ at the time of the April 2000 meetings of the erning bodier of the International Monetary World Bank and the International Moneta11 Fund 0 Fund (IMF) and the World Bank in the 21 rt (IMF) 10 Washington, DC. DSA/YDS will par­ century, we callfor the immediate stupension of the poli­ ticipate in the Mobilizatton for Global Jusucc, a cies and practices that have ca1md widerpread pover!J week of educational events and nonviolent p:o­ and mfftring among the worlds peoples, and damage to tests in Washington, which aim to promote m ·c the global environment. IJ:7e hold these inrlit11tionr respon­ equitable and democratically operated glom rible, along with the IVorldTrade Organization (WfO), stitutions in this time of sharp incguahty. I..ar~ for an unjurt global economic rystem. transnational corporations have gotten together: We issue this call in the name of global jus­ It's time for the rest of us. DSA believes Uu" tice, in solidarity with the peoples of the Global this is the appropriate follow-up to the protes o: South struggling for survival and dignity in the that derailed the \VfO meetings in Seattle face of unjust economic policies. Only when the fall. coercive powers of international financial insti­ DSA 1s joined in this mobilizanon b m tutions are rescinded shall governments be ac­ other organizations, such as Jubilee 2 • r countable first and foremost to the will of their Years is Enough, Global Exchange., and Pu people for equitable economJc development. Citizens's Global Trade Watch.
    [Show full text]
  • American Liberal Pacifists and the Memory of Abolitionism, 1914-1933 Joseph Kip Kosek
    American Liberal Pacifists and the Memory of Abolitionism, 1914-1933 Joseph Kip Kosek Americans’ memory of their Civil War has always been more than idle reminiscence. David Blight’s Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory is the best new work to examine the way that the nation actively reimagined the past in order to explain and justify the present. Interdisciplinary in its methods, ecumenical in its sources, and nuanced in its interpretations, Race and Reunion explains how the recollection of the Civil War became a case of race versus reunion in the half-century after Gettysburg. On one hand, Frederick Douglass and his allies promoted an “emancipationist” vision that drew attention to the role of slavery in the conflict and that highlighted the continuing problem of racial inequality. Opposed to this stance was the “reconciliationist” ideal, which located the meaning of the war in notions of abstract heroism and devotion by North and South alike, divorced from any particular allegiance. On this ground the former combatants could meet undisturbed by the problems of politics and ideological difference. This latter view became the dominant memory, and, involving as it did a kind of forgetting, laid the groundwork for decades of racial violence and segregation, Blight argues. Thus did memory frame the possibilities of politics and moral action. The first photograph in Race and Reunion illustrates this victory of reunion, showing Woodrow Wilson at Gettysburg in 1913. Wilson, surrounded by white veterans from North and South, with Union and Confederate flags flying, is making a speech in which he praises the heroism of the combatants in the Civil War while declaring their “quarrel forgotten.” The last photograph in Blight’s book, though, invokes a different story about Civil War memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Third parties in twentieth century American politics Sumner, C. K. How to cite: Sumner, C. K. (1969) Third parties in twentieth century American politics, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9989/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk "THIRD PARTIES IN TWENTIETH CENTURY AMERICAN POLITICS" THESIS PGR AS M. A. DEGREE PRESENTED EOT CK. SOMBER (ST.CUTHBERT«S) • JTJLT, 1969. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. INTRODUCTION. PART 1 - THE PROGRESSIVE PARTIES. 1. THE "BOLL MOOSE" PROQRESSIVES. 2. THE CANDIDACY CP ROBERT M. L& FQLLETTE. * 3. THE PEOPLE'S PROGRESSIVE PARTI. PART 2 - THE SOCIALIST PARTY OF AMERICA* PART 3 * PARTIES OF LIMITED GEOGRAPHICAL APPEAL.
    [Show full text]
  • To All Enrolled Socialist Voters: a Statement on the Primaries [Election of April 2, 1936] by Jack Altman, Et Al
    To All Enrolled Socialist Voters: A Statement on the Primaries [Election of April 2, 1936] by Jack Altman, et al. Published in The Socialist Call [New York], New York Edition, v. 2, whole no. 54 (March 28, 1936), pg. 1. You have a difficult task, but as Socialists you must be equal to your responsibility. On April 2 you will decide the immediate fu- ture of the Socialist Party in New York State. With two slates listed on the ballot, you must choose. We are sure that your choice will be made on the basis of which slate will be better able to build the Socialist Party. On the one hand, you have the Old Guard ticket set forth by Louis Waldman, which backs him in the attacks he has been mak- ing on the Socialist Party. Because he was defeated in the national convention [Detroit: June 1-3, 1934] he has waged a bitter fight for two years against the Party. On the other hand, you have the ticket supported by Norman Thomas, who today leads the Party in its most aggressive strug- gles. The Old Guard has tried to make it seem that we are Commu- nists. This is not true. We are Socialists who want the Party and its leaders to participate in a militant fight for the principles of Social- ism. We do not deny that some of the Old Guard have served So- cialism in the past. But they have since lived through a period of decline, with the party growing weaker, and they have never re- covered from it.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution on Party Controversy: Adopted by the State Convention Of
    Resolution on Party Controversy Adopted by the State Convention of the Socialist Party of Ohio, Cincinnati, June 28, 1919 Per minutes published in The Ohio Socialist, whole no. 76 (July 19, 1919), pg. 2. Morning Session, June 28. L.A. Zitt elected chairman for the day. The Credentials Committee reported H.M. Hohr, Uhrichsville, entitled to a seat. Delegate seated by motion. Motion carried that the reading of the minutes of June 27th be dispensed with. Continued report of Committee on Program and Municipal Plat- form. Resolution on Party Controversy. The National Executive Committee of the party has expelled from the party the Socialist Party of Michigan and suspended the Russian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, South Slavic, and Polish Fed- erations and is threatening with expulsion the Socialist Party of Massachusetts, and the Socialist Party of New York has expelled or “reorganized” many of the branches of the locals of greater New York as well as Locals Buffalo, Rochester, and other locals. All these expulsions or suspensions have taken place because the party units in question have endorsed the Revolutionary So- cialism of the Left Wing. They represent a desperate effort on the part of the repudiated national officers of the party and their sat- ellites in similar positions in state and local organizations, to maintain their control of the party in spite of the will of the rank and file, expressed in party referendum. In order to excuse their expulsion of nearly half the member- ship of the party and their effort to sabotage the membership by 1 refusing to tabulate the vote in the national party referendums, which expressed the will of the rank and file, these discredited and repudiated leaders are carrying on a campaign of vilification against the Left Wing, even stooping so low as to act as agent provocateurs for the capitalist class by making insinuations that the Left Wing Socialists might be guilty of individual acts of ter- rorism, and have trumped up charges, which have no basis in fact, about irregularities in the conduct of the national referen- dums.
    [Show full text]
  • What -Is Fusion? by JAM ES CASEY
    CAPiTALIS ' . What -Is Fusion? By JAM ES CASEY 11 -d t Price IIc S. Radical Pampblet Colletion Coutesy Bloomsburg State CoUege Library TRIUMPH AND DISASTER: THE READING SOCIALISTS IN POWER AND DECLINE, 1932-1939-PART II BY KrNNErm E. HENDmcKsoN, JR.' D EFEAT by the fusionists in 1931 did little internal damage to the structure of the Reading socialist movement. As a matter of fact, just the reverse was true. Enthusiasm seemed to intensify and the organization grew.' The party maintained a high profile during this period and was very active in the political and economic affairs of the community, all the while looking forward to the election of 1935 when they would have an op- portunity to regain control of city hall. An examination of these activities, which were conducted for the most part at the branch level, will reveal clearly how the Socialists maintained their organization while they were out of power. In the early 1930s the Reading local was divided into five branches within the city. In the county there were additional branches as well, the number of which increased from four in 1931 to nineteen in 1934. All of these groups brought the rank and file together each week. Party business was conducted, of_ course, but the branch meetings served a broader purpose. Fre- quently, there were lectures and discussions on topics of current interest, along with card parties, dinners, and dances. The basic party unit, therefore, served a very significant social function in the lives of its members, especially important during a period of economic decline when few could afford more than the basic es- sentials of daily life.
    [Show full text]