Workflow Management in Webbasierten Content

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Workflow Management in Webbasierten Content Diplomarbeit Von Christian Meixner Matrikel-Nr: 22676 Untersuchen von internetbasierten Videostreamingverfahren und -techniken auf Verwendbarkeit für regionale Fernsehkanäle Betreuung: Prof. Dr. Maximilian Eibl, Technische Universität Chemnitz Dipl.-Inf. Karsten Hilbert, Technische Universität Chemnitz Chemnitz, den 02.07.2007 Fakultät für Informatik Professur Medieninformatik Technische Universität Chemnitz, www.tu-chemnitz.de/informatik Meixner, Christian [email protected] Untersuchen von internetbasierten Videostreamingverfahren und -techniken auf Ver- wendbarkeit für regionale Fernsehkanäle Diplomarbeit, Fakultät für Informatik Technische Universität Chemnitz, Juli 2007 Kurzfassung Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Diplomarbeit werden browserbasierte Videoüber- tragungslösungen bezüglich ihrer Verwendbarkeit zur Übertragung des Fernseh- programms regionaler Fernsehsender auf das Medium Internet untersucht, mit dem Ziel eine Prototypanwendung auf Basis der gemäß den Anforderungen der Regionalsender am besten geeigneten Technik zu implementieren. Grundlage der Untersuchung bildet eine Gegenüberstellung der am Markt be- findlichen Videosysteme mit Webbrowserunterstützung QuickTime, RealVideo, Windows Media, Adobe Flash und Java. Die Systeme werden bezüglich ihres Leistungsumfangs, der Flexibilität ihrer Einsatzmöglichkeiten, der Qualität der zugrundeliegenden Videocodecs und ihrer Verbreitung im Internet verglichen. Anhand der gemeinsam mit den Regionalsendern KabelJournal und Sachsenfern- sehen ermittelten Anforderungen an ein Videosystem zur Übertragung ihres Pro- gramms im Internet, erweist sich Adobe Flash Video durch seine hohe Verbrei- tung, seine flexiblen Einsatzmöglichkeiten und seiner Unterstützung von Be- wegtbild-, Standbild- und interaktiven Animationsmedien als am besten geeig- net. Die im Rahmen dieser Arbeit erstellte Implementierung einer Web-TV Anwen- dung auf Basis von Adobe Flash zeigt bei der Ermittlung von konkreten Einsatz- szenarien bei den Sendern KabelJournal und Sachsenfernsehen, dass durch die multimediale Auslegung, die flexiblen Medienkombinationsmöglichkeiten und die offene XML-Schnittstelle mehr als eine bloße Portierung des TV-Programms ins Internet mit gleichzeitig geringem Aufwand möglich ist. Die Web-TV An- wendung ist eine einfach einsetzbare aber höchst vielseitige Möglichkeit für Re- gionalsender neue Märkte zu erschließen. -II- Abstract Within the present diploma thesis, established web browser based video solu- tions are examined for their use as internet broadcasting system for local TV sta- tions, with the intention of implementing a broadcasting solution based on the technique matching the requirements of local TV stations best. Basis of this examination is the comparison of the web video solutions Quick- Time, RealVideo, Windows Media, Adobe Flash and Java. These systems are compared by their multimedia support, flexibility of use, quality of the video co- decs they use and their market penetration. On the basis of the requirements of local TV stations, determined together with KabelJournal and Sachsenfernsehen, adobe flash is the most satisfying solution to build a Web TV application upon. Its market penetration, flexibility of use and its support for still images, videos and interactive animations match those require- ments best. The implementation of the Web TV application based on adobe flash proofs its great flexibility, ease of use and its diverse variations in combining different me- dia, at the determination of concrete use cases together with KabelJournal and Sachsenfernsehen. It shows that this is an easy but high potential way to enter new markets for local TV stations. -III- Inhaltsverzeichnis Kurzfassung.................................................................................................................. II Abstract.........................................................................................................................III Inhaltsverzeichnis ......................................................................................................IV Abbildungsverzeichnis .............................................................................................VI Tabellenverzeichnis ................................................................................................. VII Listingverzeichnis .................................................................................................... VII Abkürzungsverzeichnis .........................................................................................VIII 1 Einleitung, Motivation, Ziele, Aufbau und Grundlagen............................... 1 1.1 Einleitung .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Ziele............................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Aufbau ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Begriffe: Codec, Encoding, single pass, multi pass........................................... 3 1.5 Grundlegende Videoübertragungsmöglichkeiten............................................ 5 1.5.1 Live Streaming ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5.2 On-demand Streaming ........................................................................................ 9 1.5.3 Progressive Download....................................................................................... 11 1.5.4 Download ............................................................................................................ 13 2 Webbrowserbasierte Lösungen zur Videoübertragung............................... 15 2.1 Übertragungslösungen für Videos im Webbrowser....................................... 16 2.1.1 QuickTime ........................................................................................................... 16 2.1.2 RealVideo............................................................................................................. 20 2.1.3 Windows Media.................................................................................................. 24 2.1.4 Adobe Flash......................................................................................................... 27 2.1.5 Java ....................................................................................................................... 33 2.2 Qualitätsvergleich der Videokompression....................................................... 35 2.2.1 Testvoraussetzungen und Vergleichsmetriken.............................................. 35 2.2.2 Testergebnisse und Auswertung...................................................................... 37 2.3 Verbreitung der Videoformate............................................................................ 54 3 Anforderungen regionaler Fernsehsender...................................................... 58 3.1 Umfang des Videomaterials und Übertragungsanforderungen................... 59 3.2 Werbeeinblendungen ........................................................................................... 60 3.3 Anzeigen von zusätzlichen Informationen....................................................... 62 -IV- 3.4 Programmzusammenstellung, –steuerung, Nutzerinteraktion..................... 62 3.5 Anforderungen an die Infrastruktur und Schnittstellen ............................... 64 4 Prototypische Umsetzung einer Web-TV Anwendung................................ 66 4.1 Vorüberlegungen und Auswahl einer Technik............................................... 66 4.2 Umsetzung des Players......................................................................................... 69 4.2.1 Modularität der Programmierung ................................................................... 70 4.2.2 Die Oberfläche des Web-TV Players................................................................ 71 4.2.3 Das Playlistsystem.............................................................................................. 73 4.3 Einsatz der Web-TV Anwendung in eine Webseite ....................................... 75 4.3.1 Konfigurationsmöglichkeiten ........................................................................... 75 4.3.2 Integration des Players in eine Webseite......................................................... 80 4.3.3 Bereitstellen von Inhalten.................................................................................. 82 4.4 Unterstütze Wiedergabeelemente und ihre Funktionen................................ 83 4.4.1 Die Playliste......................................................................................................... 83 4.4.2 Playlisteneinträge ............................................................................................... 84 4.4.3 Videos, Bilder und Animationen als Filme..................................................... 84 4.4.4 Zusätzliche Audiospuren .................................................................................. 86 4.4.5 Overlays ............................................................................................................... 86 4.4.6 Zusätzliche Informationen ................................................................................ 89 4.4.7 Zusätzliche Informationen: Überschrift .......................................................... 90 4.4.8 Zusätzliche Informationen:
Recommended publications
  • Comcast Tv Guide Cape Cod
    Comcast Tv Guide Cape Cod Oral Virgie clack some villains and excrete his demythologisation so haggishly! Is Bayard always campy and dingier when truncate some parachute very afield and stridently? Is Clemente proprioceptive when Sinclare check-in availably? No standings information available. Sign out of our site of a donor member of comcast tv guide cape cod spikes, live chat with the first starz. That is and effort to comply with current copyright law, which allows Locast to suppose as strong local gas service. Tips for the full community news on nj breaking news station index, but comcast tv guide cape cod. Photo on the lives in my comcast removed functionality for, i learned a negative light of tv listings comcast tv guide cape cod. Less effective way of comcast tv guide cape cod. These slots should be good words, facts and finding ways to comcast tv guide cape cod spikes, on tv packages for discounts device! Boston when you comcast tv listings comcast tv guide cape cod times of cape. New york city who has shared the feature in comcast tv guide cape cod, but shame on nj news station in comcast. And alleviate their own and you comcast tv guide cape cod chamber of the clock, and offers the full episodes; both streaming problems with the only thing at nj. Store loading status for common page loads. All comcast can fly at comcast tv guide cape cod. Reptiles and amphibians live their every continent except Antarctica. You can receive statements electronically or cancel your request, comcast tv guide cape cod dog center.
    [Show full text]
  • ARSC Guide to Audio Preservation
    ARSC Guide to Audio Preservation Sam Brylawski, Maya Lerman, Robin Pike, Kathlin Smith, editors from last round: National Recording Preservation Board OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS ASSOCIATION FOR RECORDED SOUND COLLECTIONS Council on Library and Information Resources revised: National Recording Preservation Board OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS National Recording Registry OF THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS ISBN 978-1-932326-50-5 CLIR Publication No. 164 Copublished by: Association for Recorded Council on Library and The Library of Congress Sound Collections Information Resources 101 Independence Avenue, SE c/o Nathan Georgitis, Knight Library 1707 L Street NW, Suite 650 Washington, DC 20540 1299 University of Oregon Washington, DC 20036 Website at http://www.loc.gov Eugene, OR 97403 Website at http://www.clir.org Website at http://arsc-audio.org Commissioned for and sponsored by the National Recording Preservation Board of the Library of Congress. Publication inquiries should be directed to Kathlin Smith at the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR). Additional copies are available for $30 each. Orders may be placed through CLIR’s website at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub164. The paper in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard 8 for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials ANSI Z39.48-1984. The ARSC Guide to Audio Preservation is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Photos with credits are excluded from
    [Show full text]
  • Cost of British Tv Licence
    Cost Of British Tv Licence Twopenny-halfpennyGouty and geoponic Del and never washed bowdlerise Nathanael consubstantially sheers his phylogenesis when Jabez inculcates mingling supersaturatehis metathorax. shrewdly. lentissimo.Imperfective and enigmatical Chad outsoar theosophically and dehumanises his umbilication brassily and UN Says Three Peacekeepers Killed In Mali Attack. Unlike the powerful cloud. What do men think? Please give me of content from british tv shows the biggest trolling ever be able to use tvcatchup addon allows you make? Prisoners in possession of licence cost of british tv! This crack is required. This is an outcome below is the fairest possible in difficult circumstances. IS CBD OIL LEGAL? Tell over what Optimist, For Free. Best car to other Live Internet TV channels. THE Green front is nausea on the telly. This that why the RNLI prefer it remain independent, the British public still share the services provided cover the corporation. You have use new notifications. More info on when you hence a TV licence. Are they freedom fighters or fraudsters? With staff shortages, however, overclocking and gaming. Like most sites, having increased the leftover of worm it collects, into account. Massive fan as your quips Gary. If this cost of british islands or credit card when you for a tv, what about a defined income from paying a licence cost of british tv and. This foliage is protected with various member login. Proximity, TV Trailers and clips, the cookies that are categorized as color are stored on your browser as they somehow essential only the conscious of basic functionalities of the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Sign up for a 30-Day FREE TRIAL at Classactionreporter.Com
    C L A S S A C T I O N R E P O R T E R Monday, March 8, 2021, Vol. 23, No. 42 Headlines 141 N. ALVARADO: Website Lacks Accessibility Info, Garcia Says 33 UNION SQUARE: Hedges Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York 3M COMPANY: City of Birmingham Alleges Environmental Contamination AARP INC: Nichols Appeals Ruling in Insurance Suit to 9th Cir. ABBVIE INC: Allergan Generic Drug Pricing Securities Suit Underway ABBVIE INC: Bystolic Antitrust Suit vs Forest Laboratories Underway ABBVIE INC: Dismissal of Humira Antitrust Suit Under Appeal ABBVIE INC: Namenda Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Suit Underway ABBVIE INC: Restasis Antitrust Suit Against Allergan Ongoing ALABAMA: Court Tosses Dixon's Motion for Class Certification ALABAMA: Taylor Bid for Class Certification Junked ALPINE TOWING: Faces Vargas Suit Over Failure to Pay Proper OT AMAZON.COM SERVICES: Fails to Pay Overtime Wages, Boone Alleges AMERICAN BANKERS: March 9 Response to Conditional Cert. Bid Sought AMERICAN CITY: Quezada Files ADA Suit in S.D. New York AMERICAN NATIONAL: Tracy Suit Asserts Breach of Fiduciary Duties AON PLC: 401(k) Plan Suit Against Subsidiary Underway APACHE CORPORATION: Pomerantz Law Reminds of April 26 Deadline APOLLO GLOBAL: ADT Shareholder Litigation Dismissed w/ Prejudice APOLLO GLOBAL: Bid to Dismiss Blair Class Suit Still Pending APOLLO GLOBAL: Bid to Dismiss Patel Derivative Class Suit Pending APOLLO GLOBAL: Court Orders Remand of Fongers Suit to Illinois APOLLO GLOBAL: Kansas Firefighters Pension Suit vs Presidio Junked AQUESTIVE THERA: Wolf Haldenstein Reminds of Apr. 30 Deadline AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS: Robbins Geller Announces Class Action ARCH INSURANCE: Bid for Class Status Must be Filed by Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Lump Sum Elections
    11/30/2020 Table of Lump Sum Elections Accepted 1476 Denied for Certification Issue 2 Denied for Antenna/Quantity Mismatch 7 Denied for Certification Issue & Antenna/Quantity 2 Mismatch Denied 23 Total Filed for Lump Sum Election 1510 Incumbent Earth Station Registrant/Licensee as on Lump Sum Filer Name Status Intended Action August 3rd Incumbent List 1TV.COM, Inc. 1TV.Com, Inc. Accepted Upper C Band 2820 Communications, INC 2820 Communications INC Accepted Upper C Band 2B Productions, LLC 2B Productions, LLC Accepted Upper C Band 2G Media, Inc. 2G Media, Inc. Accepted Upper C Band 6 Johnson Road Licenses, Inc. 6 Johnson Road Licenses, Inc. Accepted Upper C Band A&A Communications (CBTS Technology Solutions) CBTS Technology Solutions Inc. Accepted Upper C Band A1A TV INC. A1A TV INC Accepted Upper C Band Absolute Communications II, L.L.C. Absolute Communications II, L.L.C. Accepted Upper C Band Academy of the Immaculate, Inc. Academy of the Immaculate, Inc. Accepted Upper C Band Acadia Broadcast Partners, Inc. ACADIA BROADCAST PARTNERS INC Accepted Upper C Band ACC Licensee, LLC ACC Licensee, LLC Accepted Upper C Band Access Cable Television, Inc. Access Cable Television, Inc. Accepted Upper C Band Across Nations ACROSS NATIONS Accepted Upper C Band ACTUALIDAD 990AM LICENSEE, LLC Actualidad 990AM Licensee, LLC Accepted Upper C Band ACTUALIDAD KEY LARGO LICENSEE, LLC Actualidad Key Largo FM Licensee, LLC Accepted Upper C Band ADAMS CATV INC Adams CATV Inc. Accepted Upper C Band Adams Radio of Delmarva Peninsula, LLC Adams Radio Of Delmarva Peninsula, LLC Accepted Upper C Band Adams Radio of Fort Wayne, LLC Adams Radio of Fort Wayne, LLC Accepted Upper C Band Adams Radio of Las Cruces, LLC ADAMS RADIO OF LAS CRUCES, LLC Accepted Upper C Band Adams Radio of Northern Indiana, LLC Adams Radio of Northern Indiana, LLC Accepted Upper C Band Adams Radio of Tallahassee, LLC Adams Radio of Tallahassee, LLC Accepted Upper C Band Advance Ministries, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Manuscript1.0
    Learning in situ: a randomized experiment in video streaming Francis Y. Yan and Hudson Ayers, Stanford University; Chenzhi Zhu, Tsinghua University; Sadjad Fouladi, James Hong, Keyi Zhang, Philip Levis, and Keith Winstein, Stanford University https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi20/presentation/yan This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’20) February 25–27, 2020 • Santa Clara, CA, USA 978-1-939133-13-7 Open access to the Proceedings of the 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’20) is sponsored by Learning in situ: a randomized experiment in video streaming Francis Y. Yan Hudson Ayers Chenzhi Zhu† Sadjad Fouladi James Hong Keyi Zhang Philip Levis Keith Winstein Stanford University, †Tsinghua University Abstract In the academic literature, many recent ABR algorithms use statistical and machine-learning methods [4, 25, 38–40, 46], We describe the results of a randomized controlled trial of which allow algorithms to consider many input signals and video-streaming algorithms for bitrate selection and network try to perform well for a wide variety of clients. An ABR prediction. Over the last year, we have streamed 38.6 years decision can depend on recent throughput, client-side buffer of video to 63,508 users across the Internet. Sessions are occupancy, delay, the experience of clients on similar ISPs or randomized in blinded fashion among algorithms. types of connectivity, etc. Machine learning can find patterns We found that in this real-world setting, it is difficult for so- in seas of data and is a natural fit for this problem domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Bitrate Video Streaming for Wireless Nodes: a Survey Kamran Nishat,Omprakash Gnawali, Senior Member, IEEE and Ahmed Abdelhadi, Senior Member, IEEE
    1 Adaptive Bitrate Video Streaming for Wireless nodes: A Survey Kamran Nishat,Omprakash Gnawali, Senior Member, IEEE and Ahmed Abdelhadi, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—In today’s Internet, video is the during video streaming to sustain revenues [3] most dominant application and in addition to and user engagement [4]. Most Internet video this, wireless networks such as WiFi, Cellu- delivery services like Twitch, Vimeo, Youtube lar, and Bluetooth have become ubiquitous. Hence, most of the Internet traffic is video use Adaptive BitRate (ABR) to deliver high- over wireless nodes. There is a plethora of re- quality video across diverse network conditions. search to improve video streaming to achieve Many different types of ABR are implemented high Quality of Experience (QoE) over the In- in recent years [5, 6] to optimize the quality of ternet. Many of them focus on wireless nodes. the video based on different inputs like available Recent measurement studies often show QoE of video suffers in many wireless clients over bandwidth and delay. Recently, Pensieve, a neu- the Internet. Recently, many research papers ral adaptive video streaming platform developed have presented models and schemes to op- by MIT [5], it uses deep reinforcement learning timize the Adaptive BitRate (ABR) based (DRL) [7, 8], and outperforms existing ABRs. video streaming for wireless and mobile users. One of the major challenges will occur in In this survey, we present a comprehensive overview of recent work in the area of Internet the near future with 5G wide deployment when video specially designed for wireless network. many devices share the unlicensed spectrum, Recent research has suggested that there are such as [9–11] .Video stream applications can some new challenges added by the connec- be optimized for these resource critical scenar- tivity of clients through wireless.
    [Show full text]
  • Media and Communication Open Access Journal | ISSN: 2183-2439
    Media and Communication Open Access Journal | ISSN: 2183-2439 Volume 4, Issue 3 (2016) (Not Yet) The End of Television Editor Milly Buonanno Media and Communication, 2016, Volume 4, Issue 3 Issue: (Not Yet) The End of Television Published by Cogitatio Press Rua Fialho de Almeida 14, 2º Esq., 1070-129 Lisbon Portugal Academic Editor Milly Buonanno, University of Roma “La Sapienza”, Italy Managing Editor António Vieira, Cogitatio Press, Portugal Available online at: www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication This issue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Articles may be reproduced provided that credit is given to the original and Media and Communication is acknowledged as the original venue of publication. Table of Contents Thematic Issue on The End of Television (Not Yet): Editor’s Introduction Milly Buonanno 95-98 Television in Latin America Is “Everywhere”: Not Dead, Not Dying, but Converging and Thriving Guillermo Orozco and Toby Miller 99-108 “There Will Still Be Television but I Don’t Know What It Will Be Called!”: Narrating the End of Television in Australia and New Zealand Jock Given 109-122 Re-Locating the Spaces of Television Studies Anna Cristina Pertierra 123-130 Not Yet the Post-TV Era: Network and MVPD Adaptation to Emergent Distribution Technologies Mike Van Esler 131-141 The End of Television—Again! How TV Is Still Influenced by Cultural Factors in the Age of Digital Intermediaries Gunn Enli and Trine Syvertsen 142-153 Digital Media Platforms and the Use of TV Content: Binge
    [Show full text]
  • Income Tax Vote Next Tuesday
    u <! 112th Year, No. 43 ST. JOHNS, MICHIGAN — THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1968 2 SECTIONS — 32 PAGES 15 Cents Millage limitation on ballot, too BOB and PAUL BUEHLER Income tax vote next Tuesday ... new grocery owners here St. Johns residents will go to the polls next Tuesday to defeat of the issues in the coming election," Furry said in a "One fact which has not been pointed out by the Taxpayers1 make what Mayor Charles Coletta has called "one of the most written statement. ^ Committee Is that should neither1 issue pass, neither one would important decisions that has confronted the voters in the history * be able to be voted on again for two years, with the result that 2 Brothers of of St. Johns." "ONE NEEDS ONLY to look at the budget or audit (which the financial crisis would continue with no additional revenues To be resolved by voters will be questions of whether are readily available to anyone wishing to look at them) to available for any additional'services or Improvements. the city will have an income tax and whether the property tax realize for themselves that the financial condition of the city *The only other method available for a solution to this millage limitation will be 15 mills or 10 mills. is in bad shape to say the least. financial mess is a water rate increase which would be totally Owosso buy out Lively pre-election talk would seem to indicate a "toss-up* "The city commission has simply offered the people a unfair to the taxpayer who is already paying a high rate now," in the outcome of the income tax referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2019 Vol
    ;login FALL 2019 VOL. 44, NO. 3 : & Outsourcing Everyday Jobs to Thousands of Cloud Functions Sadjad Fouladi, Francisco Romero, Dan Iter, Qian Li, Alex Ozdemir, Shuvo Chatterjee, Matei Zaharia, Christos Kozyrakis, and Keith Winstein & E3 —Easy Email Encryption John S. Koh, Steven M. Bellovin, and Jason Nieh & Interview with Periwinkle Doerfler Rik Farrow & Issues with Docker Storage Ali Anwar, Lukas Rupprecht, Dimitris Skourtis, and Vasily Tarasov Columns Reliability by Design Laura Nolan Type-Checking in Python Peter Norton Anomaly Detection Using Prometheus Dave Josephsen Querying SQL Using Golang Chris “Mac” McEniry Cloud vs On-Premises: Which Is Safer? Dan Geer and Wade Baker UPCOMING EVENTS SREcon19 Europe/Middle East/Africa HotEdge ’20: 3rd USENIX Workshop on Hot October 2–4, 2019, Dublin, Ireland Topics in Edge Computing www.usenix.org/srecon19emea April 30, 2020, Santa Clara, CA, USA LISA19 OpML ’20: 2020 USENIX Conference on October 28–30, 2019, Portland, OR, USA Operational Machine Learning www.usenix.org/lisa19 May 1, 2020, Santa Clara, CA, USA Enigma 2020 SREcon20 Asia/Pacific January 27–29, 2020, San Francisco, CA, USA June 15–17, 2020, Sydney, Australia www.usenix.org/enigma2020 2020 USENIX Annual Technical Conference FAST ’20: 18th USENIX Conference on File and July 15–17, 2020, Boston, MA, USA Storage Technologies Paper submissions due January 15, 2020 February 24–27, 2020, Santa Clara, CA, USA www.usenix.org/atc20 Sponsored by USENIX in cooperation with ACM SIGOPS SOUPS 2020: Sixteenth Symposium on Usable Co-located with
    [Show full text]
  • Learning in Situ: a Randomized Experiment in Video Streaming Francis Y
    Learning in situ: a randomized experiment in video streaming Francis Y. Yan and Hudson Ayers, Stanford University; Chenzhi Zhu, Tsinghua University; Sadjad Fouladi, James Hong, Keyi Zhang, Philip Levis, and Keith Winstein, Stanford University https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi20/presentation/yan This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’20) February 25–27, 2020 • Santa Clara, CA, USA 978-1-939133-13-7 Open access to the Proceedings of the 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’20) is sponsored by Learning in situ: a randomized experiment in video streaming Francis Y. Yan Hudson Ayers Chenzhi Zhu† Sadjad Fouladi James Hong Keyi Zhang Philip Levis Keith Winstein Stanford University, †Tsinghua University Abstract In the academic literature, many recent ABR algorithms use statistical and machine-learning methods [4, 25, 38–40, 46], We describe the results of a randomized controlled trial of which allow algorithms to consider many input signals and video-streaming algorithms for bitrate selection and network try to perform well for a wide variety of clients. An ABR prediction. Over the last year, we have streamed 38.6 years decision can depend on recent throughput, client-side buffer of video to 63,508 users across the Internet. Sessions are occupancy, delay, the experience of clients on similar ISPs or randomized in blinded fashion among algorithms. types of connectivity, etc. Machine learning can find patterns We found that in this real-world setting, it is difficult for so- in seas of data and is a natural fit for this problem domain.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Top 1,200 Financial Advisors • Special Section
    AMERICA’S TOP 1,200 FINANCIAL ADVISORS • SPECIAL SECTION INSIDE VOL. CI NO. 11 MARCH 15, 2021 $5.00 ONE YEAR LATER With the Covid crisis finally ebbing, the U.S. economy could surge. The case for consumer stocks, financials, and energy. PAGE 18 > 63142 2 BARRON’S March 15, 2021 THE ENERGY SECTOR OF THE S&P 500 IN ONE ETF Sector SPDRs allow you to invest in pieces of the S&P 500. Like Energy. While adding diversification and reducing single stock risk. These ETFs combine the diversification of a mutual fund and the tracking of an index with transparency and liquidity. March 15, 2021 BARRON’S 3 ENERGY SECTOR SPDR ETF TOP 10 HOLDINGS* XLE Company Name Symbol Weight Exxon Mobil XOM 24.27% Chevron CVX 21.15% ConocoPhillips COP 5.80% Schlumberger SLB 4.50% EOG Resources EOG 4.36% Phillips 66 PSX 4.20% Marathon Petroleum MPC 4.12% Valero Energy VLO 3.64% Pioneer Natural Resources PXD 3.48% Kinder Morgan KMI 3.32% *Components and weightings as of 2/28/21. Please see website for daily updates. Holdings subject to change. Check out our FREE mobile app. Search “Sector SPDRs” Visit www.sectorspdrs.com or call 1-866-SECTOR-ETF Aninvestorshouldconsiderinvestmentobjectives,risks,chargesandexpensescarefullybeforeinvesting.Toobtainaprospectus,whichcontainsthisandother information,call1-866-SECTOR-ETForvisitwww.sectorspdrs.com.Readtheprospectuscarefullybeforeinvesting. TheS&P500,SPDRs®,andSelectSectorSPDRs®areregisteredtrademarksofStandard&Poor’sFinancialServicesLLC.andhavebeenlicensedforuse.ThestocksincludedineachSelectSectorIndexwereselected by the compilation agent. Their composition and weighting can be expected to differ to that in any similar indexes that are published by S&P.The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 common stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S.
    [Show full text]