DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora and Vegetation Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix 1: Flora and Vegetation Tables Table 1: Desktop review of Threatened and Priority Flora Table 2: Desktop review of Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities Table 3: Flora species recorded during field survey Table 4: Revegetation Species and Site Suitability Table 1: Desktop review of Threatened and Priority Flora Taxon Conservation Habitat Likelihood TPFL WAHerb TP EPBC Status List Andersonia White/grey sand, Low. Lack of gracilis sandy clay, gravelly suitable habitat in X loam. Winter-wet survey area. areas, near swamps Anigozanthos Grey sand, clay loam. Low. Lack of viridis subsp. Winter-wet suitable habitat in X terraspectans depressions. survey area. Caladenia Grey or brown sand, High. One record huegelii clay loam, Banksia within 5 km and X X woodland suitable habitat present in the site Chamelaucium N/A Low. Outside sp. Gingin known species X range. Diuris micrantha Brown loamy clay. Low. Lack of Winter-wet swamps, in suitable habitat in X shallow water. survey area. Diuris purdiei Grey-black sand, moist. Low. Lack of Winter-wet swamps. suitable habitat in X survey area. Drakaea elastica White or grey sand. Low. Lack of Low-lying situations suitable habitat in X adjoining winter-wet survey area. swamps. Drakaea White-grey sand Low. Outside micrantha known species X Threatened range. Eucalyptus Mallee. Shallow soils Low. Lack of argutifolia over limestone. Slopes suitable habitat in X X X or gullies of limestone survey area. ridges, outcrops Grevillea Gravelly clay, sandy Low. Lack of elongata clay, sand. Road suitable habitat in X verges, swamps, creek survey area. banks. Grevillea Amongst medium Low. Lack of curviloba subsp. trees, or low trees; in suitable habitat in X curviloba sand, grey sand and survey area. winter-wet heath Grevillea Amongst low trees, or Low. Lack of curviloba subsp. tall (sclerophyll) suitable habitat in Incurva shrubland; in sand, or survey area. X clay; occupying winter wet flats Lepidosperma Peaty sand, clay Low. Lack of rostratum suitable habitat in X survey area. Marianthus White sand over Low. Lack of paralius limestone. Low coastal suitable habitat in X X cliffs survey area. Thelymitra Granite. Low. Lack of dedmaniarum suitable habitat in X survey area. Taxon Conservation Habitat Likelihood TPFL WAHerb TP EPBC Status List Baeckea sp. N/A Possible Limestone (N. X X Gibson & M.N. Lyons 1425) Drosera x Peaty sand, along lake Low. Lack of sidjamesii margins, close to suitable habitat in X X winter high-water line survey area. Grevillea sp. Coast Low. Lack of Priority 1 Ocean Reef (D. suitable habitat in X X Pike Joon 4) survey area. Leucopogon Coast Low. Lack of maritimus suitable habitat in X survey area. Melaleuca sp. Rugged limestone Low. Lack of Wanneroo (G.J. ridge. Mossy black suitable habitat in X X Keighery 16705) sand survey area. Acacia benthamii Limestone breakaways, High. Several sand records within 5 km X X X radius. Calectasia On gentle slope above Low. Lack of elegans dampland, deep grey suitable habitat in X X X quartz sand survey area Fabronia Limestone outcrops, Low. Lack of hampeana on trunk of suitable habitat in X X Macrozamia survey area Lecania turicensis Coast Low. Lack of var. turicensis suitable habitat in X X Priority 2 survey area Poranthera N/A Possible X moorokatta Stenanthemum Sand plain. Littered High. Several sublineare white sand. Banksia records within 5km X woodland from the site Tetraria sp. Mound springs. Peaty Low. Lack of Chandala (G.J. sand suitable habitat in X X Keighery 17055) survey area Thelymitra Sand clay, sand, Low. Lack of variegata laterite. Limestone suitable habitat in X hills, uplands survey area Austrostipa Coast Low. Lack of mundula suitable habitat in X survey area Conostylis Confined to coastal Low. Lack of bracteata heath and scrub; sand, suitable habitat in well-watered survey area X X depressions in Priority 3 undulating sand dunes close to limestone Cyathochaeta Grey sand, sandy clay. Low. Lack of teretifolia Swamps, creek edges suitable habitat in X X with Melaleuca survey area Hibbertia spicata Grey-yellow-white Low. Lack of subsp. leptotheca sand. Near- coastal suitable habitat in X X X limestone ridges, survey area Taxon Conservation Habitat Likelihood TPFL WAHerb TP EPBC Status List outcrops & cliffs Jacksonia N/A Possible X gracillima Leucopogon sp. Low hill, grey sand over Low. Lack of Yanchep (M. limestone close to the suitable habitat in X X Hislop 1986) coast survey area Pimelea calcicola Sand. Coastal Low. Lack of limestone ridges. suitable habitat in X X survey area Pithocarpa Gravelly or sandy loam. Low. Lack of corymbulosa Amongst granite suitable habitat in X outcrops survey area Sarcozona White sand over Low. Lack of bicarinata limestone. Open areas suitable habitat in X X X survey area Stylidium Sand soils over Possible. Suitable maritimum limestone, dune slopes habitat may occur and flats. Coastal heath in survey area X and shrubland, open Banksia woodland Stylidium Peaty sand over clay. Low. Lack of paludicola Winter wet habitats. suitable habitat in X survey area Jacksonia sericea Calcareous and sandy High. Several soils records within 5km X X X of the site Schoenus White sand. Low. Lack of griffinianus suitable habitat in X survey area Stylidium Seasonal wetland, flat Low. Lack of longitubum ground, dark brown suitable habitat in Priority 4 clay loam some peat, survey area X X over clay. Poor drainage, wet during winter/spring Tripterococcus N/A Possible sp. Brachylobus X X (A.S. George 14234) Table 2: Desktop review of Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities Conservation Ranking Community Name Aquatic Root Mat Community Number 1 of Caves of the Swan Coastal Plain Critically Endangered Banksia attenuata woodlands over species rich dense shrublands Melaleuca huegelii - Melaleuca acerosa (currently M. systena) shrublands on Endangered limestone ridges (Gibson et al. 1994 type 26a) Shrublands on dry clay flats Acacia shrublands on taller dunes Banksia ilicifolia woodlands Coastal shrublands on shallow sands Priority 3 Low lying Banksia attenuata woodlands or shrublands Northern Spearwood shrublands and woodlands Southern Eucalyptus gomphocephala-Agonis flexuosa woodlands Swan Coastal Plain Banksia attenuata - Banksia menziesii woodlands Table 3: Flora species recorded during field survey Family Species Lot 24 Lot 9000 (4ha) (54ha) Aizoaceae Carpobrotus virescens X *Ptilotus polycephala X X Amaranthaceae Ptilotus manglesii X Daucus glochidiatus X X Apiaceae Xanthosia huegelii X Lomandra hermaphrodita X Lomandra micrantha subsp. micrantha X Asparagaceae Sowerbaea laxiflora X X Thysanotus thyrsoideus X X *Arctotheca calendula X Hyalosperma cotula X X *Hypochaeris glabra X X Leptorhynchos scaber X Millotia tenuifolia X X Asteraceae *Monoculus monstrosus X Olearia axillaris X Podotheca gnaphalioides X X *Sonchus oleraceus X *Ursinia anthemoides X X Lagenophora huegelii X *Wahlenbergia capensis X Campanulaceae Wahlenbergia multicaulis X Caryophyllaceae Petrorhagia dubia X Allocasuarina humilis X Casuarinaceae Allocasuarina fraseriana X X Colchicaceae Burchardia congesta X X Crassulaceae Crassula colorata X Mesomelaena pseudostygia X X Cyperaceae Tetraria octandra X X Calectasia narragara X X Dasypogonaceae Dasypogon bromeliifolius X X Hibbertia huegelii X X Dilleniaceae Hibbertia hypericoides X X Hibbertia racemosa X X Drosera erythrorhiza X X Droseraceae Drosera macrantha subsp. macrantha X X Drosera menziesii X Astroloma pallidum X X Brachyloma preissii X Ericaceae Conostephium pendulum X Conostephium preissii X X Euphorbiaceae *Euphorbia terracina X X Family Species Lot 24 Lot 9000 (4ha) (54ha) Monotaxis grandiflora X Ricinocarpos undulatus X Acacia benthamii X Acacia cochlearis X *Acacia iteaphylla X Acacia pulchella var. goadbyi X X Acacia saligna X Bossiaea eriocarpa X X Daviesia divaricata X Daviesia nudiflora X X Daviesia physodes X Daviesia triflora X X Gastrolobium linearifolium X X Gompholobium tomentosum X Fabaceae Hardenbergia comptoniana X X Hovea stricta X X Hovea trisperma X X Isotropis cuneifolia subsp. cuneifolia X X Jacksonia floribunda X Jacksonia furcellata X Jacksonia sericea X X Jacksonia sternbergiana X Kennedia prostrata X X *Lotus subbiflorus X *Ornithopus pinnatus X *Trifolium campestre var. campestre X Geraniaceae *Pelargonium capitatum X X Dampiera linearis X X Goodeniaceae Scaevola repens var. angustifolia X X Anigozanthos humilis X X Anigozanthos manglesii X X Conostylis aculeata subsp. cygnorum X X Haemodoraceae Conostylis aurea X Conostylis setigera subsp. setigera X X Haemodorum laxum X X Phlebocarya ciliata X Dianella revoluta X X Hemerocallidaceae Tricoryne elatior X Caesia micrantha X *Gladiolus caryophyllaceus X X Iridaceae Patersonia occidentalis X X *Watsonia meriana var. bulbillifera X Loranthaceae Nuytsia floribunda X Family Species Lot 24 Lot 9000 (4ha) (54ha) Molluginaceae Macarthuria australis X Beaufortia elegans X Calothamnus sanguineus X Calytrix flavescens X Calytrix fraseri X Eremaea pauciflora var. pauciflora X Eucalyptus marginata X X Eucalyptus todtiana X Myrtaceae Hypocalymma robustum X X Kunzea glabrescens X Leptospermum erubescens X *Leptospermum laevigatum X Leptospermum spinescens X Melaleuca megacephala X Melaleuca parviceps X Caladenia arenicola X Caladenia discoidea X X Caladenia flava X X Diuris magnifica X X Orchidaceae Drakaea glyptodon X Elythranthera brunonis X Pterostylis vittata X X Pyrorchis nigricans X Thelymitra campanulata X X Oxalidaceae *Oxalis pes-capre X X Papaveraceae *Fumaria capreolata X X Pittosporaceae Billardiera
Recommended publications
  • Level 2 Flora, Vegetation and Graceful Sun Moth Survey

    Level 2 Flora, Vegetation and Graceful Sun Moth Survey

    TECHNICAL REPORT TAMALA PARK DEVELOPMENT AREA LEVEL 2 FLORA, VEGETATION AND GRACEFUL SUN MOTH SURVEY MAY 2010 FOR TAMALA PARK REGIONAL COUNCIL Perth Melbourne 12 Monger Street 2/26-36 High Street PerthWA,Australia 6000 Northcote VIC,Australia 3070 t +61[0]8 9227 9355 t +61[0]3 9481 6288 f +61[0]9 9227 5033 f +61[0]3 9481 6299 ABN : 39 092 638 410 www.syrinx.net.au SYRINX ENVIRONMENTAL PL REPORT NO. RPT-0914-004 LIMITATIONS OF REPORT Syrinx Environmental PL has prepared this report as an environmental consultant provider. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. This report has not been prepared for the use, perusal or otherwise, by parties other than the Client, the Owner and their nominated consulting advisors without the consent of the Owner. No further information can be added without the consent of the Owner, nor does the report contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or for other uses. The information contained in this report has been prepared in good faith, and accuracy of data at date of issue has been compiled to the best of our knowledge. However, Syrinx Environmental PL is not responsible for changes in conditions that may affect or alter information contained in this report before, during or after the date of issue. Syrinx Environmental PL accepts site conditions as an indeterminable factor, creating variations that can never be fully defined by investigation. Measurements and values obtained from sampling and testing are indicative within a limited time frame and unless otherwise specified, should not be accepted as actual realities of conditions on site beyond that timeframe.
  • PUBLISHER S Candolle Herbarium

    PUBLISHER S Candolle Herbarium

    Guide ERBARIUM H Candolle Herbarium Pamela Burns-Balogh ANDOLLE C Jardin Botanique, Geneva AIDC PUBLISHERP U R L 1 5H E R S S BRILLB RI LL Candolle Herbarium Jardin Botanique, Geneva Pamela Burns-Balogh Guide to the microform collection IDC number 800/2 M IDC1993 Compiler's Note The microfiche address, e.g. 120/13, refers to the fiche number and secondly to the individual photograph on each fiche arranged from left to right and from the top to the bottom row. Pamela Burns-Balogh Publisher's Note The microfiche publication of the Candolle Herbarium serves a dual purpose: the unique original plants are preserved for the future, and copies can be made available easily and cheaply for distribution to scholars and scientific institutes all over the world. The complete collection is available on 2842 microfiche (positive silver halide). The order number is 800/2. For prices of the complete collection or individual parts, please write to IDC Microform Publishers, P.O. Box 11205, 2301 EE Leiden, The Netherlands. THE DECANDOLLEPRODROMI HERBARIUM ALPHABETICAL INDEX Taxon Fiche Taxon Fiche Number Number -A- Acacia floribunda 421/2-3 Acacia glauca 424/14-15 Abatia sp. 213/18 Acacia guadalupensis 423/23 Abelia triflora 679/4 Acacia guianensis 422/5 Ablania guianensis 218/5 Acacia guilandinae 424/4 Abronia arenaria 2215/6-7 Acacia gummifera 421/15 Abroniamellifera 2215/5 Acacia haematomma 421/23 Abronia umbellata 221.5/3-4 Acacia haematoxylon 423/11 Abrotanella emarginata 1035/2 Acaciahastulata 418/5 Abrus precatorius 403/14 Acacia hebeclada 423/2-3 Acacia abietina 420/16 Acacia heterophylla 419/17-19 Acacia acanthocarpa 423/16-17 Acaciahispidissima 421/22 Acacia alata 418/3 Acacia hispidula 419/2 Acacia albida 422/17 Acacia horrida 422/18-20 Acacia amara 425/11 Acacia in....? 423/24 Acacia amoena 419/20 Acacia intertexta 421/9 Acacia anceps 419/5 Acacia julibross.
  • Restoration After Removal of Pines at Gnangara Final

    Restoration After Removal of Pines at Gnangara Final

    RESTORATION OF BANKSIA WOODLAND AFTER THE REMOVAL OF PINES AT GNANGARA: SEED SPECIES REQUIREMENTS AND PRESCRIPTIONS FOR RESTORATION A report prepared on behalf of the Department of Environment and Conservation for the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy Kellie Maher University of Western Australia May 2009 Restoration of Banksia woodland after the removal of pines at Gnangara: seed species requirements and prescriptions for restoration Report for the Department of Environment and Conservation Kellie Maher University of Western Australia Gnangara Sustainability Strategy Taskforce Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 www.gnangara.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2009 May 2009 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 , all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Conservation and Environment. This document has been commissioned/produced as part of the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy (GSS). The GSS is a State Government initiative which aims to provide a framework for a whole of government approach to address land use and water planning issues associated with the Gnangara groundwater system. For more information go to www.gnangara.water.wa.gov.au 1 Restoration of Banksia woodland after the removal of pines at Gnangara: seed species requirements and prescriptions for restoration A report to the Department of Environment and Conservation Kellie Maher University of Western Australia May 2009 2 Table of Contents List of Tables ....................................................................................................................
  • Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)

    Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)

    Comparative floral presentation and bee-pollination in two Sprengelia species (Ericaceae) Karen A. Johnson* and Peter B. McQuillan School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Pollination by sonication is unusual in the Styphelioideae, family Ericaceae. Sprengelia incarnata and Sprengelia propinqua have floral characteristics that suggested they might be adapted to buzz pollination.Both species have florally similar nectarless flowers except that the stamens ofSprengelia propinqua spread widely after the flower opens, while those of Sprengelia incarnata cohere in the centre of the flower. To test whether sonication occurs, we observed bee behaviour at the flowers of both plant species, documented potential pollinators, and examined their floral and pollen attributes. We found that Sprengelia incarnata had smaller and drier pollen than Sprengelia propinqua. We found that Sprengelia incarnata was sonicated by native bees in the families Apidae (Exoneura), Halictidae (Lasioglossum) and Colletidae (Leioproctus, Euryglossa). Sprengelia propinqua was also visited by bees from the Apidae (Exoneura) and Halictidae (Lasioglossum), but pollen was collected by scraping. The introduced Apis mellifera (Apidae) foraged at Sprengelia propinqua but ignored Sprengelia incarnata. The two Sprengelia species shared some genera of potential pollinators, but appeared to have diverged enough in their floral and pollen characters to elicit different behaviours from the native and introduced bees. Cunninghamia (2011) 12 (1): 45–51 Introduction species, some Leucopogon species, Richea milliganii (Hook.f.) F.Muell., and Sprengelia incarnata Sm. (Houston The interactions between plants and pollinators are thought & Ladd, 2002; Ladd, 2006).
  • Flora and Vegetation Survey of the Proposed Kwinana to Australind Gas

    Flora and Vegetation Survey of the Proposed Kwinana to Australind Gas

    __________________________________________________________________________________ FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED KWINANA TO AUSTRALIND GAS PIPELINE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR Prepared for: Bowman Bishaw Gorham and Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Prepared by: Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd November 2003 MATTISKE CONSULTING PTY LTD DRD0301/039/03 __________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Location................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Climate .................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Declared Rare and Priority Flora......................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Local and Regional Significance........................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Threatened
  • Appendix F- H (PDF, 4.64

    Appendix F- H (PDF, 4.64

    APPENDIX F Analysis to Investigate TEC SCP20a Presence Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section)– Supplementary Biological Studies 2015 Assessment of the Presence of the TEC SCP20a at Ioppolo Rd, Chittering COFFEY NOVEMBER 2015 TEL. (08) 9315 4688 [email protected] PO Box 50, Applecross WA 6953 www.woodmanenv.com.au Coffey Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section)– Supplementary Biological Studies 2015 Assessment of the presence of the TEC SCP20a at Ioppolo Rd, Chittering Perth–Darwin National Highway (Swan Valley Section) – Supplementary Biological Studies 2015: Assessment of the presence of the TEC SCP20a at Ioppolo Rd, Chittering Prepared for: Coffey Job Number: Coffey15‐28 Report Number: Coffey15‐28‐03 Cover Photograph: Lot M2019 ‐ Ioppolo Road, waypoint 82 (Woodman Environmental) DOCUMENT REVISION AND STATUS Revision Status Originator Internal Internal Client Client Reviewer Review Date Reviewer Review Date A Draft report BL CG/GW 22/10/2015 N. Raymond 16/11/2015 Main Roads B Client Comments BL GW 19/11/2015 D. Morley 26/11/2015 Incorporated Main Roads 0 Final report BL GW 26/11/2015 DISCLAIMER This document is prepared in accordance with and subject to an agreement between Woodman Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd (“Woodman Environmental”) and the client for whom it has been prepared (“Coffey”) and is restricted to those issues that have been raised by the Client in its engagement of Woodman Environmental and prepared eusing th standard of skill and care ordinarily exercised by Environmental Scientists
  • Vertebrate Fauna in the Southern Forests of Western Australia

    Vertebrate Fauna in the Southern Forests of Western Australia

    tssN 0085-8129 ODC151:146 VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey P. CHRISTENSEN,A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER FORESTS DEPARTMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA BULLETIN94, 1985 T:- VertebrateFauna in The SouthernForests of WesternAustralia A Survey By P. CHRISTENSEN, A. ANNELS, G. LIDDELOW AND P. SKINNER Edited by Liana ChristensenM.A. (w.A.I.T.) Preparedfor Publicationby Andrew C.A. Cribb B.A. (U.W.A.) P.J. McNamara Acting Conservator of Forcsts 1985 I I r FRONT COVER The Bush R.at (Rattus fuscipes): the most abundantof the native mammals recordedby the surueyteams in WesternAustralia's southernforests. Coverphotograph: B. A. & A. C. WELLS Printed in WesternAustralia Publishedby the ForestsDepartmeDt of WesternAustralia Editor MarianneR.L. Lewis AssistantEditor Andrew C.A. Cribb DesignTrish Ryder CPl9425/7/85- Bf Atthority WILLIAM BENBOW,Aciing Cov€mmenaPrinter, Wesrern Ausrralia + Contents Page SUMMARY SECTION I-INTRODUCTION HistoricalBackground. Recent Perspectives SECTION II-DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY AREA Boundariesand PhysicalFeatures 3 Geology 3 Soils 3 Climate 6 Vegetation 6 VegetationTypes. 8 SECTION III-SURVEY METHODS 13 SECTION IV-SURVEY RESULTSAND LIST OF SPECIES. l6 (A) MAMMALS Discussionof Findings. l6 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies .17 (ii) IntroducedSpecies .30 (B) BIRDS Discussionof Findings List of Species .34 (C) REPTILES Discussionof Findings. List of Species. .49 (D) AMPHIBIANS Discussionof Findings. 55 List of Species. 55 (E) FRESHWATER FISH Discussionof Findings. .59 List of Species (i) IndigenousSpecies 59 (ii) IntroducedSpecies 6l SECTION V-GENERALDISCUSSION 63 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 68 REFERENCES 69 APPENDICES I-Results from Fauna Surveys 1912-t982 72 II-Results from Other ResearchStudies '74 Within The SurveyArea 1970-1982.
  • Vegetaton and Flora of Lot 9503 Wedgetail Circle Parkerville

    Vegetaton and Flora of Lot 9503 Wedgetail Circle Parkerville

    VEGETATON AND FLORA OF LOT 9503 WEDGETAIL CIRCLE PARKERVILLE Prepared for: COTERRA ENVIRONMENT 19/336 Churchill Avenue, SUBIACO WA 6008 Prepared by: Bennett Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd Sollya heterophylla PO Box 341 KALAMUNDA 6926 December 2012 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS Scope of Services This report (“the report”) has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract, or as otherwise agreed, between the Client and Eleanor Bennett (“the Author”). In some circumstances a range of factors such as time, budget, access and/or site disturbance constraints may have limited the scope of services. Reliance on Data In preparing the report, the Author has relied upon data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other information provided by the Client and other individuals and organisations, most of which are referred to in the report (“the data”). Except as otherwise stated in the report, the Author has not verified the accuracy or completeness of the data. To the extent that the statements, opinions, facts, information, conclusions and/or recommendations in the report (“conclusions”) are based in whole or part on the data, those conclusions are contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of the data. The Author will not be liable in relation to incorrect conclusions should any data, information or condition be incorrect or have been concealed, withheld, misrepresented or otherwise not fully disclosed to the Author. Environmental Conclusions In accordance with the scope of services, the Author has relied upon the data and has conducted environmental field monitoring and/or testing in the preparation of the report. The nature and extent of monitoring and/or testing conducted is described in the report.
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation

    GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation

    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
  • How Does Genome Size Affect the Evolution of Pollen Tube Growth Rate, a Haploid Performance Trait?

    How Does Genome Size Affect the Evolution of Pollen Tube Growth Rate, a Haploid Performance Trait?

    Manuscript bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version postedClick April here18, 2019. to The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv aaccess/download;Manuscript;PTGR.genome.evolution.15April20 license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Effects of genome size on pollen performance 2 3 4 5 How does genome size affect the evolution of pollen tube growth rate, a haploid 6 performance trait? 7 8 9 10 11 John B. Reese1,2 and Joseph H. Williams2 12 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 13 37996, U.S.A. 14 15 16 17 1Author for correspondence: 18 John B. Reese 19 Tel: 865 974 9371 20 Email: [email protected] 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/462663; this version posted April 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 22 ABSTRACT 23 Premise of the Study – Male gametophytes of most seed plants deliver sperm to eggs via a 24 pollen tube. Pollen tube growth rates (PTGRs) of angiosperms are exceptionally rapid, a pattern 25 attributed to more effective haploid selection under stronger pollen competition. Paradoxically, 26 whole genome duplication (WGD) has been common in angiosperms but rare in gymnosperms.
  • WA Limestone Yanchep M70-1325 Mining Proposal 2014-05

    WA Limestone Yanchep M70-1325 Mining Proposal 2014-05

    LEVEL 2 FLORA AND VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE YANCHEP RIDGES SURVEY AREA Prepared for WA LIMESTONE Prepared by Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd May 2014 WAL1301/057/13 Disclaimer and Limitation This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of WA Limestone, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between WA Limestone and Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. This report is based on the scope of services defined by WA Limestone, budgetary and time constraints imposed by WA Limestone, the information supplied by WA Limestone (and its agents), and the method consistent with the preceding. Copying of this report or parts of this report is not permitted without the authorisation WA Limestone or Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. DOCUMENT HISTORY Prepared Reviewed Submitted to WA Limestone Report Version By By Date Copies Internal Review V1 DM JC - - Draft Report released for Client Review V2 DM/JC JC/EMM 05/02/2014 Email Final Report V3 JC EMM 31/05/2014 Email Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location and Scope of Proposal ..................................................................................................
  • Literaturverzeichnis

    Literaturverzeichnis

    Literaturverzeichnis Abaimov, A.P., 2010: Geographical Distribution and Ackerly, D.D., 2009: Evolution, origin and age of Genetics of Siberian Larch Species. In Osawa, A., line ages in the Californian and Mediterranean flo- Zyryanova, O.A., Matsuura, Y., Kajimoto, T. & ras. Journal of Biogeography 36, 1221–1233. Wein, R.W. (eds.), Permafrost Ecosystems. Sibe- Acocks, J.P.H., 1988: Veld Types of South Africa. 3rd rian Larch Forests. Ecological Studies 209, 41–58. Edition. Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, Abbadie, L., Gignoux, J., Le Roux, X. & Lepage, M. 146 pp. (eds.), 2006: Lamto. Structure, Functioning, and Adam, P., 1990: Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge Uni- Dynamics of a Savanna Ecosystem. Ecological Stu- versity Press. Cambridge, 461 pp. dies 179, 415 pp. Adam, P., 1994: Australian Rainforests. Oxford Bio- Abbott, R.J. & Brochmann, C., 2003: History and geography Series No. 6 (Oxford University Press), evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric 308 pp. Hultén. Molecular Ecology 12, 299–313. Adam, P., 1994: Saltmarsh and mangrove. In Groves, Abbott, R.J. & Comes, H.P., 2004: Evolution in the R.H. (ed.), Australian Vegetation. 2nd Edition. Arctic: a phylogeographic analysis of the circu- Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp. marctic plant Saxifraga oppositifolia (Purple Saxi- 395–435. frage). New Phytologist 161, 211–224. Adame, M.F., Neil, D., Wright, S.F. & Lovelock, C.E., Abbott, R.J., Chapman, H.M., Crawford, R.M.M. & 2010: Sedimentation within and among mangrove Forbes, D.G., 1995: Molecular diversity and deri- forests along a gradient of geomorphological set- vations of populations of Silene acaulis and Saxi- tings.