DOCSLIB.ORG

Recurring Actions in Arizona, California, and Nevada October 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recurring Actions in Arizona, California, and Nevada October 2014 Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment Recurring Actions in Arizona, California, and Nevada October 2014 U.S. Department of Homeland Security 1111 Broadway, Suite 1200 Oakland, California 94607 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... vi SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Disaster Programs .................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Regulatory Background ........................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Purpose of This Document....................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Activities Not Covered by This Programmatic Environmental Assessment ............................................................................................... 1-4 1.5.1 Statutory Exclusions .................................................................... 1-4 1.5.2 Categorical Exclusions................................................................. 1-4 1.5.3 Activities Requiring a Stand-Alone Environmental Assessment Instead of a Programmatic Environmental Assessment ................................................................................... 1-5 1.5.4 Activities Requiring an Environmental Impact Statement .......... 1-5 1.6 Activities Covered by the Programmatic Environmental Assessment ............................................................................................... 1-5 1.7 Purpose of and Need for Action............................................................... 1-5 1.8 Using the Programmatic Environmental Assessment .............................. 1-6 1.8.1 Organization of the Programmatic Environmental Assessment ................................................................................... 1-6 1.8.2 Use of the Programmatic Environmental Assessment ................. 1-6 1.8.3 Complementary Programmatic Documents ................................. 1-9 SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES ................................ 2-1 2.1 No Action Alternative .............................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Non-Emergency Debris Removal ............................................................ 2-2 2.3 Constructing, Modifying, or Relocating Facilities .................................. 2-3 2.3.1 Upgrading or Otherwise Modifying Structures ........................... 2-3 2.3.2 Providing Temporary Facilities ................................................... 2-4 2.3.3 Acquiring and Demolishing Existing Facilities ........................... 2-4 2.3.4 Repairing, Realigning, or Otherwise Modifying Roads, Trails, Utilities, and Rail Lines .................................................... 2-5 2.3.5 Constructing New Facilities or Relocating Existing Facilities ....................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.6 Relocating the Function of an Existing Facility .......................... 2-6 2.3.7 Developing Demonstration Projects ............................................ 2-6 2.4 Activities Involving Watercourses and Coastal Features ........................ 2-6 2.4.1 Repairing, Stabilizing, or Armoring Embankments .................... 2-7 2.4.2 Creating, Widening, Clearing, or Dredging a Waterway ............. 2-7 2.4.3 Constructing a Water Crossing .................................................... 2-8 2.4.4 Constructing a Water Detention, Retention, Storage or Conveyance Facility..................................................................... 2-9 2.4.5 Constructing Other Flood Control Structures .............................. 2-9 2.4.6 Constructing a Coastal Feature .................................................. 2-10 2.5 Vegetation Management ........................................................................ 2-10 2.5.1 Mechanical or Hand Clearing of Vegetation ............................. 2-10 Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment Federal Emergency Management Agency Recurring Activities in Arizona, California, and Nevada Page i October 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.5.2 Herbicidal Treatments ................................................................ 2-11 2.5.3 Biological Control ...................................................................... 2-11 SECTION 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Geology, Seismicity, and Soils ................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................... 3-2 3.1.2 Geology, Geologic Hazards, and Soils ........................................ 3-3 3.2 Air Quality ............................................................................................... 3-7 3.2.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................... 3-7 3.2.2 Air Quality ................................................................................... 3-8 3.3 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................. 3-10 3.3.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-10 3.4 Water Resources .................................................................................... 3-10 3.4.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-10 3.4.2 Water Resources ........................................................................ 3-17 3.5 Biological Resources ............................................................................. 3-19 3.5.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-19 3.5.2 Biological Resources ................................................................. 3-21 3.6 Historic Properties and archaeological resources .................................. 3-22 3.6.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-22 3.6.2 Historic Properties ..................................................................... 3-24 3.7 Socioeconomics ..................................................................................... 3-25 3.7.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-25 3.7.2 Socioeconomic Conditions ........................................................ 3-25 3.8 Land Use and Planning .......................................................................... 3-26 3.8.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-26 3.8.2 Land Uses................................................................................... 3-29 3.9 Public Services and Recreation .............................................................. 3-31 3.9.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-31 3.9.2 Public Services and Recreation .................................................. 3-31 3.10 Transportation ........................................................................................ 3-32 3.10.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-32 3.10.2 Transportation ............................................................................ 3-33 3.11 Noise ...................................................................................................... 3-35 3.11.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-35 3.12 Hazardous Materials and Wastes ........................................................... 3-36 3.12.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-36 3.12.2 Hazardous Materials and Wastes and the Affected Environment ............................................................................... 3-37 3.13 Visual Resources .................................................................................... 3-38 3.13.1 Regulatory Background ............................................................. 3-38 SECTION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACTIVITIES AND ALTERNATIVES ........... 4-1 4.1 Geology, Seismicity, and Soils ................................................................ 4-2 4.1.1 No Action Alternative .................................................................. 4-2 4.1.2 General Consequences of Proposed Activities ............................ 4-2 4.1.3 Consequences Attributable to Specific Activities ........................ 4-3 Draft Programmatic Environmental Assessment Federal Emergency Management Agency Recurring Activities in Arizona, California, and Nevada Page ii October 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.2 Air Quality ............................................................................................... 4-4 4.2.1 No Action Alternative .................................................................. 4-4 4.2.2 General Consequences of Proposed Activities ............................ 4-4 4.2.3 Consequences Attributable to Specific Activities ........................ 4-5 4.3 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................... 4-7 4.3.1 No Action Alternative .................................................................. 4-7
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert
    BLM LIBRARY BURE/ IT 88014080 An Overview of the Cultural Resources of the Western Mojave Desert by E . G ary Stic kel and - L ois J . W einm an Ro berts with sections by Rainer Beig ei and Pare Hopa cultural resources publications anthropology— history Cover design represents a petroglyph element from Inscription Canyon, San Bernardino County, California. : AN OVERVIEW OF THE CULTURAL RESOURCES OF THE WESTERN TOJAVE DESERT by Gary Stickel and Lois J. Weinman- Roberts Environmental Research Archaeologists: A Scientific Consortium Los Angeles with sections by Rainer Berger and Pare Hopa BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LIBRARY Denver, Colorado 88014680 Prepared for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert Planning Program 3610 Central Avenue, Suite 402 Riverside, California 92506 Contract No. YA-512-CT8-106 ERIC W. RITTER GENERAL EDITOR Bureau of Land RIVERSIDE, CA Management Library 1980 Bldg. 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 *•' FOREWORD Culture resource overviews such as this bring together much of the available information on prehistoric and historic peoples and present- day Native American groups along with their associated environments. The purpose behind these studies is to provide background information for the management of and research into these prehistoric, historic, and contemporary resources. This overview is one of seven covering the southern California deserts undertaken as part of a comprehensive planning effort by the Bureau of Land Management for these deserts. Overviews aid in the day-to-day management of cultural resources and in the completion of environmental analyses and research projects. Its general value to the public in the fields of education and recreation-interpretation must also be stressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripps Family Papers on the Founding of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c86115wt Online items available Scripps Family Papers on the Founding of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Copyright 2018 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla 92093-0175 [email protected] URL: http://libraries.ucsd.edu/collections/sca/index.html Scripps Family Papers on the SMC 0003 1 Founding of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Descriptive Summary Languages: English Contributing Institution: Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla 92093-0175 Title: Scripps Family Papers on the Founding of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Creator: Scripps (Family : San Diego, Calif,)) Identifier/Call Number: SMC 0003 Physical Description: 1.6 Linear feet(4 archives boxes) Date (inclusive): 1900-1996 (bulk 1903-1938) Abstract: A small but important collection of correspondence, records, miscellaneous papers, and photographs that documents the Scripps family's role as a foundational supporter of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, originally known as the Marine Biological Association of San Diego. Scope and Content of Collection The Scripps Family Papers on the Founding of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) is a small but important collection of correspondence, records, miscellaneous papers, and photographs that documents the Scripps family's role as a foundational supporter of SIO (originally known as the Marine Biological Association of San Diego). The early correspondence includes exchanges between Ellen Browning Scripps, E. W. Scripps, and Robert Paine Scripps with the first series of officers of the Institution, including Fred Baker, William E. Ritter, Thomas Wayland Vaughan, Harald Sverdrup, and presidents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS Dr. Harry A. Butowsky GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1 Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study (Draft 1990) Introduction by Dr. Harry A. Butowsky Historian, History Division National Park Service, Washington, DC The Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study represents the second phase of the National Park Service's thematic study of the history of American science. Phase one of this study, Astronomy and Astrophysics: A National Historic Landmark Theme Study was completed in l989. Subsequent phases of the science theme study will include the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, physics and other related sciences. The Science Theme Study is being completed by the National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service in compliance with the requirements of the Historic Sites Act of l935. The Historic Sites Act established "a national policy to preserve for public use historic sites, buildings and objects of national significance for the inspiration and benefit of the American people." Under the terms of the Act, the service is required to survey, study, protect, preserve, maintain, or operate nationally significant historic buildings, sites & objects. The National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service is charged with the responsibility of identifying America's nationally significant historic property. The survey meets this obligation through a comprehensive process involving thematic study of the facets of American History. In recent years, the survey has completed National Historic Landmark theme studies on topics as diverse as the American space program, World War II in the Pacific, the US Constitution, recreation in the United States and architecture in the National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land
    DRECP Proposed LUPA and Final EIS CHAPTER III.8. CULTURAL RESOURCES III.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES This chapter presents the Affected Environment for the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) Decision Area and the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) area for cultural resources. These areas overlap, and in the following programmatic discussion are referred to broadly as the “California Desert Region.” More than 32,000 cultural resources are known in the DRECP area in every existing environmental context ⎼ from mountain crests to dry lake beds ⎼ and include both surface and subsurface deposits. Cultural resources are categorized as buildings, sites, structures, objects, and districts (including cultural landscapes and Traditional Cultural Properties) under the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). Historic properties are cultural resources included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), maintained by the Secretary of the Interior (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 60.4). See Section III.8.1.1 for more information on federal regulations and historic properties. This chapter discusses three types of cultural resources classified by their origins: prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic. Prehistoric cultural resources are associated with the human occupation of California prior to prolonged European contact. These resources may include sites and deposits, structures, artifacts, rock art, trails, and other traces of Native American human behavior. In California, the prehistoric period began over 12,000 years ago and extended through the eighteenth century until 1769, when the first Europeans settled in California. Ethnographic resources represent the heritage of a particular ethnic or cultural group, such as Native Americans or African, European, Latino, or Asian immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 Cultural Resources
    4.5 – Cultural Resources 4.5 Cultural Resources This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources along the IC Project Alignment, identifies applicable significance thresholds, assesses the IC Project’s impacts to these resources and their significance, and recommends measures to avoid or substantially reduce any effects found to be potentially significant. Cultural resources are defined as any object or specific location of past human activity, occupation, or use that is identifiable through historical documentation, inventory, or oral evidence. Cultural resources can be separated into three categories: archaeological, building/structural, and traditional resources. Archaeological resources include prehistoric and historic remains of human activity. Prehistoric resources can be composed of lithic scatters, ceramic scatters, quarries, habitation sites, temporary camps/rock rings, ceremonial sites, and trails. Historic-era resources are typically those that are 50 years or older. Historic archaeological resources can consist of structural remains (e.g., concrete foundations), historic objects (e.g., bottles and cans), features (e.g., refuse deposits or scatters), and sites (e.g., resources that contain one or more of the aforementioned categories). Built environment resources range from historic buildings to canals, historic roads and trails, bridges, ditches, cemeteries, and electrical infrastructure, such as transmission lines, substations, and generating facilities. A traditional cultural resource is a resource associated with the cultural practices, traditions, beliefs, lifeways, arts, crafts, or social institutions of a living community. They are rooted in a traditional community’s history and are important in maintaining the continuing cultural identity of the community. See Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for a discussion on cultural resources of potential importance to California Native American tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME I: INVENTORIES OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ON CALIFORNIA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 Prepared by: FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Sacramento, California 95834 and JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March2000 Calirornia llisloric Miliiary Buildings and Structures Inventory, \'olume I CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ ii TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................... viii SERIES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 I. I Purpose and Goals ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EB-2011-0140 in the MATTER of Sections 70
    EB-2011-0140 IN THE MATTER OF sections 70 and 78 of the Ontario Energy Board Act 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15 (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF a Board-initiated proceeding to designate an electricity transmitter to undertake development work for a new electricity transmission line between Northeast and Northwest Ontario: the East-West Tie line. INTERROGATORIES OF RES CANADA TRANSMISSION LP to EWT L.P. January 30, 2013 12115001_5|TORDOCS EB-2011-0140 Interrogatories of RES Canada Transmission LP to EWT L.P. Filed: January 30, 2013 Page 2 of 24 Interrogatory #1 Project Schedules Reference: a. AltaLink: Part B, Section 7 b. EWT: Part B, Exhibit 7 c. CNPI: Part B, Section 7 d. Iccon/TPT: Volume 1, Section 7 e. UCT: Section B, Section 7 f. RES: Exhibit N Preamble: Each applicant has prepared development and construction cost estimates that are dependent, inter alia, upon underpinning project schedule assumptions. Some applicants have assumed aggressive project schedules. For example, both UCT and EWT assume that the leave to construct process – from application to decision – can be completed in less than one year. The generalized phase-by-phase project schedule of each applicant is shown in the table below. The questions below are intended to test the reasonableness of the scheduling assumption and the sensitivity of development and construction cost estimates to changes in the project schedule that underpins each such estimate. Table 1: Project Schedules Questions: a. What evidence can EWT offer that a nine month leave-to-construct phase – from application to decision – is reasonable and achievable? 12115001_5|TORDOCS EB-2011-0140 Interrogatories of RES Canada Transmission LP to EWT L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to “Old Scripps Building” at Scripps Institution of Oceanography Elizabeth N
    A Guide to “Old Scripps Building” at Scripps Institution of Oceanography Elizabeth N. Shor and Fred N. Spiess January 31, 2002 George H. Scripps Memorial Marine Biological Laboratory, as it appeared when completed in 1910. History of Old Scripps Building The George H. Scripps Memorial Marine Biological Laboratory is the original building on the present site of Scripps Institution of Oceanography (of the University of California, San Diego). Now designated "Old Scripps Building," the two-story reinforced-concrete structure was erected in 1909-1910. The building was designed by Irving J. Gill, a locally prominent architect. He designed an unadorned utilitarian building, using the method by Julius and Albert Kahn (of Detroit, Michigan) of concrete reinforced with trussed bars, which have a rectangular cross-section of the main bar, with flanges on two diagonally opposed corners. (An example is in the display case on the first floor.) Ritter was keen on good natural lighting for the laboratories, so two skylights were included and "sidewalk lights" were installed on the second floor to provide light to the first floor. Each office had frosted-glass windows along the inner wall. The building had the basic utilities of water, gas, and electricity. The two-story structure was completed in July 1910 at a cost of $15,818.09, which was less than its estimate. It is 26 feet high, 75 feet long, and 50 feet wide. Ellen B. Scripps, who had provided the funds, specified that the building was to be called George H. Scripps Laboratory, in memory of her deceased older brother.
    [Show full text]
  • 157Th Meeting of the National Park System Advisory Board November 4-5, 2015
    NORTHEAST REGION Boston National Historical Park 157th Meeting Citizen advisors chartered by Congress to help the National Park Service care for special places saved by the American people so that all may experience our heritage. November 4-5, 2015 • Boston National Historical Park • Boston, Massachusetts Meeting of November 4-5, 2015 FEDERAL REGISTER MEETING NOTICE AGENDA MINUTES Meeting of May 6-7, 2015 REPORT OF THE SCIENCE COMMITTEE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE URBAN AGENDA REPORT ON THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC VALUATION STUDY OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ACTIONS ON ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS • Planning for a Future National Park System • Strengthening NPS Science and Resource Stewardship • Recommending National Natural Landmarks • Recommending National Historic Landmarks • Asian American Pacific Islander, Latino and LGBT Heritage Initiatives • Expanding Collaboration in Education • Encouraging New Philanthropic Partnerships • Developing Leadership and Nurturing Innovation • Supporting the National Park Service Centennial Campaign REPORT OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMITTEE PLANNING A BOARD SUMMARY REPORT MEETING SITE—Boston National Historical Park, Commandant’s House, Charlestown Navy Yard, Boston, MA 02139 617-242-5611 LODGING SITE—Hyatt Regency Cambridge, 575 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 62139 617-492-1234 / Fax 617-491-6906 Travel to Boston, Massachusetts, on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 Hotel Check in 4:00 pm Check out 12:00 noon Hotel Restaurant: Zephyr on the Charles / Breakfast 6:30-11:00 am / Lunch 11:00 am - 5:00 pm / Dinner 5-11:00 pm Room Service: Breakfast 6:00 am - 11:00 am / Dinner 5:00 pm - 11:00 pm Wednesday NOVEMBER 4 NOTE—Meeting attire is business. The tour will involve some walking and climbing stairs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Historic Landmarks Geology
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS Dr. Harry A. Butowsky GEOLOGY THEME STUDY Page 1 Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study (Draft 1990) Introduction by Dr. Harry A. Butowsky Historian, History Division National Park Service, Washington, DC The Geology National Historic Landmark Theme Study represents the second phase of the National Park Service's thematic study of the history of American science. Phase one of this study, Astronomy and Astrophysics: A National Historic Landmark Theme Study was completed in l989. Subsequent phases of the science theme study will include the disciplines of biology, chemistry, mathematics, physics and other related sciences. The Science Theme Study is being completed by the National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service in compliance with the requirements of the Historic Sites Act of l935. The Historic Sites Act established "a national policy to preserve for public use historic sites, buildings and objects of national significance for the inspiration and benefit of the American people." Under the terms of the Act, the service is required to survey, study, protect, preserve, maintain, or operate nationally significant historic buildings, sites & objects. The National Historic Landmarks Survey of the National Park Service is charged with the responsibility of identifying America's nationally significant historic property. The survey meets this obligation through a comprehensive process involving thematic study of the facets of American History. In recent years, the survey has completed National Historic Landmark theme studies on topics as diverse as the American space program, World War II in the Pacific, the US Constitution, recreation in the United States and architecture in the National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Equipos Aprobados
    Equipos Aprobados Tipo de Equipo Marca Modelo Aerogenerador ENAIR ENAIR 70 Aerogenerador GAIA-WIND GAIA-WIND133-11KW Aerogenerador GE (General Electric) 1.6-100 Aerogenerador HANWA test Aerogenerador Siemens SWT-2.3-101 Aerogenerador Southwest Windpower Skystream 3.7 Aerogenerador Urban Green Energy UGE-4K Aerogenerador Vento360 Vento360 V-1 Aerogenerador Vergenet Eolien GEV MP 275 KW Aerogenerador Vesta V90 Aerogenerador WEPOWER Falcon 12KW Vertical Axis Aerogenerador WEPOWER Falcon 5.5KW Vertical Axis Aerogenerador WES WES 50 Aerogenerador WES WES100 Batería Solartek 250-12CX Batería AGM SLX250-12 Batería ALPHA TECHNOLOGIES AlphaCell 3.5HP (P/N 1810077) Batería ALPHA TECHNOLOGIESs AlphaCell 4.0HP (P/N 1810078) Batería AOKLY 6GFM 200G Batería AOKLY 6GFM100G Batería AOKLY 6GFM150G Batería AOKLY 6GFM250G Batería AOKLY POWER 6GFM100G (12V/100Ah) GALES Batería AOKLY POWER 6GFM150G (12V/150Ah) GALES Equipos Aprobados Tipo de Equipo Marca Modelo Batería AOKLY POWER 6GFM200G (12V/200Ah) GALES Batería AOKLY POWER 6GFM250G (12V/250Ah) GALES Batería AQUION ENERGY M100-LS82 Batería AQUION ENERGY S30-0080 Batería AXITEC AXIstorage Li 10S Batería AXITEC AXIstorage Li 7S Batería AXITEC AXIstorage Li 9S Batería Alpha ess M48112-P Batería Alpha ess M4856-P Batería Alpha ess M4856-S Batería Alpha ess Smile5-BAT Batería Aquion Energy S10-0070 Batería BMZ ESS 7.0 Batería BMZ ESS 9.0 Batería BMZ ESS X Batería BYD Battery-Box H10.0 Batería BYD Battery-Box H5.0 Batería BYD Battery-Box H7.5 Batería BYD Battery-Box Pro 13.8 Batería Blue Planet Energy BI2-08-18U
    [Show full text]
  • Index-1966.Pdf
    2 administered trine Metal ^nflsB tw^^t^tanMBM^ttma*^ ^H ^mmm)ttmmm\^mMrV\,9^* .jrepernesZ Jan 1, 1966 contents page 1 Summary of areas administered by the National Park Service 1 Areas administered by the National Park Service (alphabetical listing) 26 Authorized areas for which lands have not been acquired 28 National Historic Sites not owned by the Federal Government 29 Authorized areas which the National Park Service will not administer 30 Sites declared eligible for the National Registry of Natural Landmarks 31 Sites declared eligible for the Registry of National Historic Landmarks 44 Areas administered by the National Park Service (by category) SUMMARY OF AREAS ADMINISTERED BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE [Note: See page 44 for list of areas by category] LANDS WITHIN EX­ CATEGORY NUMBER FEDERAL LAND TERIOR BOUNDARIES TOTAL LANDS WITHIN (ACRES) NOT FEDERALLY EXTERIOR BOUND­ OWNED (ACRES) ARIES (ACRES) NATIONAL PARKS 32 13,619,099.36 207,068.32 13,826, 167.68 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARKS 10 33,358.91 6, 259. 74 39,618.65 NATIONAL MONUMENTS 77 8,941,778.02 121,209. 13 9,062,987.15 NATIONAL MILITARY PARKS il 29,367.63 2,570.00 31,937.63 NATIONAL MEMORIAL PARK 1 69,000.34 1,435.66 70,436.00 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELDS 5 2,733.01 1,4%. 35 4,229.36 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARKS 4 7,162. 76 2,105.29 9,268.05 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD SITES 780.04 5.83 785. 87 NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES 23* 3,088. 95 281.56 3,370. 51 NATIONAL MEMORIALS 16 5,319.80 206.
    [Show full text]