DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural and Historical Resource Study for the Bayshore Bikeway Project, San Diego County, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural and Historical Resource Study for the Bayshore Bikeway Project, San Diego County, California Cultural and Historical Resource Study for the Bayshore Bikeway Project, San Diego County, California Submitted to: SANDAG Prepared for: Mr. Tim Belzman HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Blvd., Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91941 Prepared by: Arleen Garcia-Herbst M.A., RPA Senior Archaeologist Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D., RPA Senior Archaeologist November 2008 2034 Corte Del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE STUDY for the BAYSHORE BIKEWAY PROJECT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: SANDAG Prepared for: Mr. Tim Belzman HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Blvd., Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91941 Prepared by: ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte Del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 Arleen Garcia-Herbst M.A., RPA Senior Archaeologist Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D., RPA Senior Archaeologist November 2008 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE (NADB) INFORMATION....... v MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................. vi 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT INFORMATION ............................1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 1 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS................................................................. 2 Segment 4.......................................................................................... 2 Segment 5.........................................................................................13 Segment 7.........................................................................................17 Segment 8A.......................................................................................17 PERSONNEL........................................................................................25 2. PROJECT AREA SETTING .......................................................... 27 NATURAL SETTING .............................................................................27 CULTURAL SETTING ...........................................................................27 Early Man: Human Occupation Prior to 11,500 B.P. (Before Present) ...............27 Paleoindian Period (11,200 B.P. to 10,600 B.P.) .........................................28 Archaic Period (8500 B.P. to 1500 B.P.)...................................................29 Late Prehistoric (1500 B.P. to 200 B.P.) ...................................................30 Ethnographic Setting............................................................................31 HISTORIC PERIOD ...............................................................................32 Spanish Period (1769-1822) ...................................................................32 Mexican Period (1822-1846) ..................................................................33 American Period (1846-Present)..............................................................33 RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS ................................................................37 CA-SDI-13073H.................................................................................37 CA-SDI-16385H.................................................................................45 3. METHODS ................................................................................ 47 SURVEY CONDITIONS..........................................................................47 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION ....................................................48 CURATION OF FIELD NOTES ................................................................48 4. REPORT OF FINDINGS .............................................................. 49 SEGMENT 5 ........................................................................................49 Rail Line on Tidelands Avenue ...............................................................49 SEGMENT 7 AND 8A ............................................................................50 Coronado Belt Line Railroad (SDI-13073H) ...............................................50 Bayshore Bikeway Project i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Chapter Page 5. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS............................................. 51 NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION ...............................51 CEQA AND THE CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION .....52 CITY OF SAN DIEGO LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE .................................53 City of San Diego Historical Resources Register..........................................53 City of San Diego CEQA Significance ......................................................54 Non-Significant Resource Types..............................................................54 Chula Vista And National City Historic Resource Registers ............................55 EVALUATION OF AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HISTORIC RESOURCES..................................................................56 BNSF/ AT&SF Rail Line (CA-SDI-16385H) ..............................................56 Coronado Belt Line Railroad (CA-SDI-13073H) ..........................................58 6. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 61 REFERENCES.................................................................................... 63 CERTIFICATION ............................................................................... 69 APPENDICES..................................................................................... 71 APPENDIX A. Key Personnel Resumes APPENDIX B - Confidential. Records Search APPENDIX C. Native American Consultation APPENDIX D – Confidential. Historical Resource Location Maps APPENDIX E – Confidential. Updated Historic Resource Records ii Bayshore Bikeway Project Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1a. Project location on USGS 7.5’ quadrangle map......................................... 3 Figure 1b. Project location on USGS 7.5' quadrangle map......................................... 5 Figure 2. APE map Sheet 1. ............................................................................ 7 Figure 3. APE map Sheet 2. ............................................................................ 9 Figure 4. APE map Sheet 3. ...........................................................................11 Figure 5. APE map Sheet 4. ...........................................................................15 Figure 6. APE map Sheet 5. ...........................................................................19 Figure 7. APE map Sheet 6. ...........................................................................21 Figure 8. APE map Sheet 7. ...........................................................................23 Figure 9. Overview of the segment of track observed on Tidelands Ave. that is part of CA-SDI-16385H........................................................................49 Figure 10. Overview of an overgrown segment of the Coronado Belt Line Railroad track (SDI-13073H). ......................................................................50 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Previous Cultural Resource Projects Within One-Half Mile of the Project Area ..........................................................................................38 Table 2. Cultural Resources Within the Project Area ............................................43 Table 3. Cultural Resources Within One-Half Mile of the APE................................44 Table 4. Recommendations for Cultural Resources Within the Project Area ................57 Bayshore Bikeway Project iii NADB Information NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA BASE (NADB) INFORMATION Authors: Arleen Garcia-Herbst, M.A. RPA, Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D., RPA Consulting Firm: ASM Affiliates 2034 Corte Del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 Date: November 2008 Title: Cultural and Historical Resource Study for the Bayshore Bikeway Project, San Diego County, California Submitted to: SANDAG Submitted by: Mr. Tim Belzman HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Blvd., Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91941 Contract Number: Not Applicable USGS Quadrangles: Point Loma, National City and Imperial Beach 7.5-minute Acres: Unknown: 4.5-mile linear alignment Keywords: SDI-13073H, Historic Coronado Railroad; CA-SDI-16385H, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Bayshore Bikeway Project v Management Summary MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report presents the results of a cultural and historical resources inventory completed by ASM Affiliates, Inc. (ASM) for Segments 4, 5, 7 and 8A of the proposed Bayshore Bikeway project, in the cities of San Diego, National City and Chula Vista, California. This study consisted of a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Site Files records search at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) and an intensive pedestrian survey of the entire project area of potential effects (APE). This records search identified 12 previously recorded cultural resources with assigned trinomials and 95 previously recorded cultural resources assigned primary numbers within one-half mile of the project boundary. Two previously recorded cultural resources are located within the project APE. These two resources were relocated during the field surveys conducted on April 11-15, 2007. No new cultural resources were identified by pedestrian archaeological survey. Two cultural resources were identified within the project area by records searches: CA-SDI- 16385H, a segment of the BNSF/AT&SF rail line and CA-SDI-13073H, a segment of the Coronado Belt Line. The BNSF/AT&SF
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN for The
    FINAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN for the APPROVED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SUNRISE POWERLINK FINAL ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR SOUTHERN ROUTE, SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management El Centro Field Office 1661 S. 4th Street El Centro, California and SDG&E Special Projects 8315 Century Park Court, CP 21G San Diego, California 92123 Prepared by: David R. Iversen, MA, RPA Arleen Garcia-Herbst, M.A., RPA Don Laylander, M.A. ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 July 2010 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT .................................................................. v 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 1 Reroutes.......................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 9 CONSTRUCTION METHODS ......................................................................................... 9 DESCRIPTION OF AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS ................................................ 10 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................... 11 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources
    4.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources 4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES This section evaluates the potential impacts to agriculture and forest resources associated with implementation of the 2050 RTP/SCS. The information presented was compiled from multiple sources, including the County of San Diego, the State of California Department of Conservation (DOC), the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), CAL FIRE, and local jurisdictions. 4.2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Agriculture Overview of Agriculture in the Region Agriculture is not only an important contributor to the economy of the San Diego region; it also is a primary land use in the unincorporated area of the region. San Diego County contains 6,687 farms and agriculture ranked fifth as a component of the region’s economic resources (County of San Diego 2010). San Diego County is the 16th largest agricultural economy among all counties in the nation. The region’s unique topography creates a wide variety of microclimates resulting in nearly 30 different types of vegetation communities. This diversity allows San Diego farmers to grow over 200 different agricultural commodities, such as strawberries along the coast, apples in the mountain areas, and palm trees in the desert (County of San Diego 2010). The region ranks first in both California and the nation in production value of nursery plants, floriculture, and avocados. Statewide, San Diego County is in the top five counties for producing cucumbers, mushrooms, tomatoes, boysenberries and strawberries, grapefruit, Valencia oranges, tangelos and tangerines, honey, and eggs. San Diego County has the largest community of organic growers in the state and nation, with 374 farms growing more than 175 crops (County of San Diego 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • V. R. Todd and R. E. Learned and Thomas J. Peters and Ronald T
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1547-A ^UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE SILL HILL, HADSER, AND CALIENTE ROADLESS AREAS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By V. R. Todd and R. E. Learned U.S. Geological Survey and Thomas J. Peters and Ronald T. Mayerle U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and the Joint Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of min­ eral surveys of the Sill Hill (5-304), Hauser (5-021), and Caliente (5-017) Roadless Areas, Cleveland National Forest, San Diego dpunty, California. SUMMARY The Sill Hill, Hauser, and Caliente Roadless Areas comprise approximately 20,000 acres in the Cleveland National Forest, San Diego County, Calif, (fig. 1). Geological and geochemical investigations have been conducted by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Survey of the Melrose Drive Extension
    Archaeological and Historical Resources Survey and Evaluation for the Melrose Drive Extension Project, Oceanside, California Prepared for: Seán Cárdenas, RPA Senior Project Manager HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91941 Prepared by: Susan M. Hector, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D. Senior Archaeologist And Michelle Dalope Associate Archaeologist December 2009 2034 Corte Del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 (760) 804-5757 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES SURVEY AND EVALUATION FOR THE MELROSE DRIVE EXTENSION PROJECT, OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Seán Cárdenas, RPA Senior Project Manager HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91941 Prepared by: Susan M. Hector, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Sinéad Ní Ghabhláin, Ph.D. Senior Archaeologist Michelle Dalope Associate Archaeologist ASM Affiliates, Inc. 2034 Corte Del Nogal Carlsbad, California 92011 December 2009 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1 2. PROJECT AREA BACKGROUND ................................................... 5 ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................... 5 PREHISTORIC CULTURAL SEQUENCE .................................................... 6 Terminological Framework ..................................................................... 6 Human Occupation Prior to 11,500 B.P. ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This Chapter Presents an Overall Summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the Water Resources on Their Reservations
    4 Tribal Nations of San Diego County This chapter presents an overall summary of the Tribal Nations of San Diego County and the water resources on their reservations. A brief description of each Tribe, along with a summary of available information on each Tribe’s water resources, is provided. The water management issues provided by the Tribe’s representatives at the San Diego IRWM outreach meetings are also presented. 4.1 Reservations San Diego County features the largest number of Tribes and Reservations of any county in the United States. There are 18 federally-recognized Tribal Nation Reservations and 17 Tribal Governments, because the Barona and Viejas Bands share joint-trust and administrative responsibility for the Capitan Grande Reservation. All of the Tribes within the San Diego IRWM Region are also recognized as California Native American Tribes. These Reservation lands, which are governed by Tribal Nations, total approximately 127,000 acres or 198 square miles. The locations of the Tribal Reservations are presented in Figure 4-1 and summarized in Table 4-1. Two additional Tribal Governments do not have federally recognized lands: 1) the San Luis Rey Band of Luiseño Indians (though the Band remains active in the San Diego region) and 2) the Mount Laguna Band of Luiseño Indians. Note that there may appear to be inconsistencies related to population sizes of tribes in Table 4-1. This is because not all Tribes may choose to participate in population surveys, or may identify with multiple heritages. 4.2 Cultural Groups Native Americans within the San Diego IRWM Region generally comprise four distinct cultural groups (Kumeyaay/Diegueno, Luiseño, Cahuilla, and Cupeño), which are from two distinct language families (Uto-Aztecan and Yuman-Cochimi).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Natural Resources Report
    APPENDIX C - NATURAL RESOURCES REPORT Cuyamaca Rancho State Park Equestrian Facilities Project Final EIR Page 444 January June 2010 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Project Introduction.....................................................................................................4 1.1 Project Location..........................................................................................................4 1.2 Project Description .....................................................................................................4 1.3 Consultation and Survey Dates...................................................................................4 1.4 Limitations that May Influence Results......................................................................5 2.0 Environmental Setting.................................................................................................5 2.1 Existing Environment/Environmental Baseline..........................................................5 2.2 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................5 2.3 Jurisdictional Waters of the United States Including Wetlands .................................6 2.4 Soil Series ...................................................................................................................7 2.5 Vegetation Communities ............................................................................................8 2.6 Biocorridors ................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Cuyamaca Rancho State Park 13652 Highway 79 Julian, CA 92036 (760) 765-3020
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is Cuyamaca to provide for the health, inspiration and idden waterfalls and education of the people of California by helping H Rancho to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological more than 100 miles of diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities trails through forest State Park for high-quality outdoor recreation. and meadow silently witness the regrowth of Cuyamaca Rancho California State Parks supports equal access. State Park. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (760) 765-3020. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Cuyamaca Rancho State Park 13652 Highway 79 Julian, CA 92036 (760) 765-3020 © 2010 California State Parks (Rev. 2016) Printed on Recycled Paper E ast of San Diego, Cuyamaca Rancho (”what the rain left State Park offers respite from the dry behind”), Iguai’ (“the Southern California landscape. The nest”), Wa-Ku-Pin’ (“warm park’s 24,700 acres of oak and conifer house”), Mitaragui’ forests and expansive meadows are broken (“crooked land”), Pilcha’ by running streams. (“basket bush”), and Located in the Peninsular Range of Guatay’ (“big house”). mountains, Cuyamaca Peak, at 6,512 feet, Historic mention of the is the second highest point in San Diego Cuyamaca Kumeyaay County. From the peak, visitors can see begins in 1782 when Anza-Borrego Desert State Park to the east Spanish Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Resources Survey for the San Diego Fire-Rescue Air Operations Hangar Project (WBS #B-15012.02.02)
    Historical Resources Survey for the San Diego Fire-Rescue Air Operations Hangar Project (WBS #B-15012.02.02) Prepared for City of San Diego Submitted to Platt/Whitelaw Architects, Inc. 4034 30th Street San Diego, CA 92104 Contact: Mr. Thomas Brothers Prepared by RECON Environmental, Inc. 1927 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 P 619.308.9333 RECON Number 9078 December 16, 2019 Carmen Zepeda-Herman, M.A., Project Archaeologist Historical Resources Survey ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE REPORT FORM I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Phase II of the San Diego’s Fire-Rescue Air Operations (AirOps) Facility Project (proposed project) would design and construct permanent helicopter hangars and support facilities at Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport. The project area is located in the northeastern corner of the airport in the Kearny Mesa community of the city of San Diego, California (Figure 1). The project area is within an unsectioned portion of the Mission San Diego landgrant on the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute La Jolla quadrangle (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows the project location on a City 800’ map. The project area consists of a 6.5-acre site located adjacent to the Air Traffic Control Tower between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) lease area, the Runway Object Free Area, and the Runway Protection Zone for the northwest approach to Runway 5/23 (Figure 4). Entry to the project area is via an asphalt road accessed from a security gate located off Ponderosa Avenue. AirOps is a 24/7 365-day operating facility with no hangar space at Montgomery Field. A feasibility study concluded that 30,000 square feet of hangar space is required to meet future needs of the AirOps fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.9 Archaeological and Paleontological Resources
    SECTION 3.9 ARCHAEOLOGICAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.9 ARCHAEOLOGICAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.9.1 INTRODUCTION This section examines the potential impacts to arctlaeological and paleontological resources, including Native American cultural resources, that may result from the Proposed Project, and is based on the Archaeological and Paleontolog~caI Resources Technical Report prepKred by DLIDEK (May 2009). As further explained below, any potential impacts to archaeological and paleontological resources would be mitigated to a level below significant. The technical report relied upon for pro-par afion of this section is included in Appendix 3.9 of tl~s ELR. 3.9.2 METHODOLOGY 3.9.2.1 Archaeological Resources An occchaeological records search of data maintained at the South Coastal Archaeological Information Center ("SCIAC") was requested on April 16, 2009, ai~d SCIAC completed the records search on April 21, 2009. The records search, which included the review of relevant archaeological report and site record databases, extended to all areas within 0.25 mile of tlie Project site. (Please see AppenctKx A of the technica~ report, located in Appendix 3.9, for a list of the reports and records identified during the records search.) 3.9.2.2 Paleontological Resources The paleontologicai resource investigation relied on the foliowing documents: Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California (Kennedy and Petorson, 1975); Geotechnical Input for Environmental Impact Report (Southloa~d Geotechnical Consultants (SGC), 2009; see Appendix 3.4); and Paleontological Resources, County of San Diego (Demhr~ and Walsh, 1993). 3.9.2.3 Native American Cultural Resources In order to assess the potential impacts to Native American cnfturaI resources, a letter (dated ApriI 15, 2009) was sent to the Native American Heritage Corm~ssion ("NAHC") requesti~lg: (i) fl~at a Sacred Lands F~Ie search be conducted for the Project site and neighboring vicirdty; and (ti) that a list of local tribal contacts be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Template for RECON Letter
    An Employee-Owned Company June 24, 2016 Ms. Rikkie Ren Creative Design Associates 17528 E. Rowland Street, 2nd Floor City of Industry, CA 91748 Reference: Archaeological Survey for the Loma Alta Residence (RECON Number 7804) Dear Ms. Ren: This letter is to document the archaeological survey for the Loma Alta Residence (project) in the city of Oceanside, California. The archaeological survey was undertaken to fulfill City of Oceanside’s responsibilities under the California Environmental Quality Act. A qualified RECON archaeologist surveyed the project property on June 15, 2016 to identify, evaluate, and record any observable surface cultural resources. No prehistoric or historic cultural resources were observed during the survey of the property. 1.0 Introduction The project site is located in the city of Oceanside, east of Interstate 5 and north of State Route 78 (Figure 1). The project site consists of 4.13 acres (Assessor’s Parcel Number 149-010-2800) in Section 24 of Township 11 South, Range 5 West of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic map, San Luis Rey quadrangle (Figure 2). The project site is composed of undeveloped land consisting of disturbed and ornamental vegetation and is surrounded by single-family residential development to the north, south, east, and west (Figure 3). The project proposes the construction of 10 single-family dwelling units on a previously undeveloped 4.13- acre parcel. 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.1 Physical Setting The project site is currently vacant. Residential fencing bounds most of the property, with a segment of chain-link fencing along Loma Alta Drive.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Impact Table and Cultural Resources Evaluation Report
    APPENDIX B Cultural Resources Impact Table and Cultural Resources Evaluation Report The following provides a list of project components resulting in potential impacts to historical and archaeological resources. This list is adopted from Table 4.0-1, Pipeline ID in Archaeolgocial Site Vicinities, as presented in the Cultural Resources Evaluation. Cultural Resources Impact Table Presence of Recorded Presence of Undisturbed or Site within Recorded Site Disturbed/ Partially Sub-Basin DESCRIPTOR 100’ within 500’ Site Number Developed Disturbed B01 B01070.00-B01071.00 x SDI-5779 x B01 B01111.A0-B01111.B0 x SDI-5785H x B01 B01076.00-B01079.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01074.00-B01075.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01070.00-B01071.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01108.00-B01109.00 x SDI-5787H x B01 B01118.00-B01119.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01017.00-B01018.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01111.A0-B01111.B0 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01016.00-B01017.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01015.00-B01016.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01076.00-B01079.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01074.00-B01075.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01118.00-B01119.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01070.00-B01071.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01117.00-B01118.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01031.E0-B01031.F0 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01108.00-B01109.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01037.00-B01038.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01036.00-B01037.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01035.00-B01036.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01034.00-B01035.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01032.00-B01033.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01028.00-B01030.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01013.00-B01014.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01011.00-B01013.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01009.00-B01010.00 x SDI-5792 x B01 B01113.B0-B01113.C0
    [Show full text]
  • ROMOLAND USGS 7.5-Min
    PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE MENIFEE TRACT 37400 PROJECT CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA (ROMOLAND U.S.G.S. 7.5-minute quadrangle, Township 5 South / Range 3 West Section 16 SBBM) Assssor’s Parcel Numbers 331-080-005-7, 331-080-009-12, 331-080-018-21, 331-080-024, 331-080-025, 331-080-027, and 331-080-028 Prepared on Behalf of: The Garrett Group, LLC, Miriam Rodriguez Two Betterworld Circle, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 951-801-1857 Prepared for: The City of Menifee Planning Department 29714 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 Prepared by: Sue A. Wade Heritage Resources P.O. Box 8 Ramona, CA 92065 760-445-3502 September 12, 2018 (Field Survey 12/27/2017) Heritage Resources Project Number 17010 Keywords: 46.9 Acres, Negative Results MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the methods and results of a Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Menifee Tract 37400 property. The project property consists of 46.9 acres located in Perris Valley, southeast of the community of Romoland and north of the community of Sun City, in the City of Menifee. The project is a Tentative Tract Map (No. 37400) proposal to the City of Menifee for residential development. The proposal is by The Garrett Group, Two Better World Circle, Suite 200, Temecula, CA 92590. Proposed site improvements will include 174 single-family residential buildings, a 1.23-acre centrally located park, a water quality basin, and associated surface improvements. Development of the project will most likely include minimal cuts and fills of up to a few feet based on existing topography of the site (GeoTek 2018).
    [Show full text]