What Is a Centromere?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Is a Centromere? INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING FERTILITY: CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION ERRORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL TOXINS by JODI M. JACKSON Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Advisor: Dr. Patricia A. Hunt Department of Genetics CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2007 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of ______________________________________________________ candidate for the Ph.D. degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. I dedicate this dissertation to the loving memory of my grandmother, Margaret Franz. Her unwavering conviction that education opens doors, coupled with her sacrifice to ensure her family had opportunities not available to her, propelled me far beyond where my own endurance surely would have failed. iv Table of Contents Dedication………………………………………………………………………………..iv Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………...v List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..x List of Figures....................................................................................................................xi Abstract…………............................................................................................................xii Chapter 1: Introduction and Research Aims Introduction…………………………………………………………………..........1 Why Chromosome Segregation and Environmental Toxins?......................1 What Happens When Chromosome Segregation Goes Wrong?..................2 The BALB/cWt Y Chromosome………………………………………….3 Chromosome Segregation in Spo13 Deficient S. cerevisiae……………...4 What is a Centromere?.................................................................................5 Centromere Sequence…………………...………………...………6 Centromere Proteins………………………………………….……9 What is a Good Strategy to Study the Centomere?....................................13 What is Known About the Y Centromere?................................................13 Environmental Toxins and Human Reproduction……………………….16 Is the Incidence of Human Fertility Increasing?........................................16 Impacts of Environmental Toxins on Male Infertility…………………...17 Medical Exposure………………………………………………..17 Occupational Exposure…………………………………………..18 v Day-to-Day Exposure……………………………………………18 Impacts of Environmental Toxins on Female Infertility………………...22 Medical Exposure………………………………………………..22 Occupational Exposure…………………………………………..22 Day-to-Day Exposure……………………………………………23 What are Quaternary Ammonium Compounds?........................................24 Chapter 2: The mouse A/HeJ Y chromosome: Another good Y gone bad………..28 Abstract………………………………………………………………………….29 Introduction……………………………………………………………………...30 Methods and Materials…………………………………………………………..32 Mice…………………………………………………………….………..32 Southern Blot Analysis………………………………………….……….33 Fetal Gonad Analysis and Chromosome Preparations…………………..34 Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Studies……………………………….35 Y Chromosome Mapping………………………………………..35 Aneuploidy Analysis…………………………………………….36 Meiotic Preparations…………………………………………………….36 Diakinesis and Metaphase II…………………………………….36 Pachytene………………………………………………………...37 Results…………………………………………………………………………...37 Hermaphroditism is a feature of the A/HeJ strain……………………….37 Hermaphroditism is a property of the A/HeJ Y chromosome…………...38 vi The YA/HeJ and YWt chromosomes are different on the sequence level….39 The YA/HeJ chromosome is prone to mitotic mis-segregation……………41 The YA/HeJ centromere exhibits morphological aberrations……………...42 The YA/HeJ chromosome segregates faithfully in meiosis………………..46 The structural integrity of the YA/HeJ chromosome………………………48 Discussion………………………………………………………………………..51 Structural evidence that the YA/HeJ and YWt chromosomes are different...52 Behavioral differences between the YA/HeJ and YWt chromosomes……...53 Why does the YA/HeJ cause disturbances in sexual differentiation?...........53 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………58 Chapter 3: Disinfectants and Dysfunction: Solving the Mystery…………………..59 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………..60 Introduction………………………………………………………………………61 Methods and Materials…………………………………………………………...62 Breeding Protocols……………………………………………………….62 Superovulation…………………………………………………………...62 Methanol Cage Extractions………………………………………………62 Analytical Methods………………………………………………………63 Results…………………………………………………………………………....64 Problems in a new breeding colony are immediately apparent………….64 Ruling out the obvious candidates……………………………………….65 New research studies reveal continued reproductive disturbances………67 vii Are we victims of our own research?........................................................70 Discontinued use of the disinfectant but persistence of the chemical compounds……………………………………………………………….72 Inadvertent recontamination……………………………………………..73 Discussion………………………………………………………………………..77 Chapter 4: Summary and Future Directions………………..……………………….80 Summary…………………………………………………………………………80 The Mouse A/HeJ Y Chromosome: Another Good Y Gone Bad……….80 The A/HeJ Y Chromosome Induces Hermaphroditism………… 80 Comparison on A/HeJ and BALB/cWt…………………………..81 Sequence…………………………………………………81 Segregation Behavior…………………………………….82 Structural Analysis of the YA/HeJ Chromosome………………….83 Morphological Aberration of the A/HeJ Y Centromere…………83 Disinfectants and Dysfunction: Solving the Mystery…………………...84 Breeding Problems in the New Colony………………………….84 Changing the Environment………………………………………84 Reproductive Problems Continue………………………………..85 Identifying the Source of the Reproductive Disturbances……….85 Eliminating the Quaternary Ammonium Disinfectant…………...86 Accidental Recontamination……………………………………..87 Future Directions………………………………………………………...88 viii Studies of the A/HeJ Y Chromosome……………………………88 Centromere……………………………..………………...88 Sexual Differentiation…………………….……...………89 Epigenetic Analysis………………………...……………91 Analysis of the Effect of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds on Reproduction……………………………………………..92 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………….95 ix List of Tables Chapter 1 Table 1.1 Examples of proteins that localize to the centromere and kinetochore and their functions…………….……………………………………………………………11 Table 1.2 Examples of studies of the impact of chemical exposure on human fertility...21 Table 1.3 Examples of common quaternary ammonium compounds and the types of products typically containing each one………………………………………….26 Chapter 2 Table 2.1 Analysis of Y chromosome hyperploidy and gaps…………………….…......42 Table 2.2 Meiotic analysis in C57BL/6J-YA/HeJ males…………………………….…….47 x List of Figures Chapter 1 Figure 1.2 Regions of the centromere and kinetochore………………………………....12 Chapter 2 Figure 2.1 Southern analysis of Bkm repeats in genomic DNA………………………...40 Figure 2.2 The frequency of Y chromosome hyperploidy and of chromatid gaps are not correlated in individual C57BL/6-YA/HeJ animals……………………44 Figure 2.3 Representative images of YA/HeJ chromosome morphological aberrations observed during analysis of A/HeJ Y chromosome in liver and fibroblast cells…………………………………………………………………………..45 Figure 2.4 Schematic showing the normal localization and a brief description of the eight FISH probes used in the structural analysis of the A/HeJ Y chromosome…..49 Figure 2.5 Structural analysis of the A/HeJ Y chromosome……………………………50 Chapter 3 Figure 3.1 A morphologically abnormal 18.5 day A/J fetus…………………….………66 Figure 3.2 Pregnancy rates in young (6-8 week) virgin C57BL/6J females………….…68 Figure 3.3 Cage extracts reveal contamination with quaternary ammonium compounds……………………………………………………………….…..73 Figure 3.4 Quaternary ammonium contaminants are transferred during cage washing...76 xi Investigation of Factors Affecting Fertility: Chromosome Segregation Errors and Environmental Toxins Abstract by JODI M. JACKSON If a species cannot propagate, it cannot survive. Human fertility is thought to be declining, with a myriad of possible causes. The objective of this dissertation was to investigate two factors that affect fertility: chromosome segregation errors and environmental toxins. Aneuploidy affects 10-30% of human conceptions and is the leading genetic cause of pregnancy loss and mental retardation. Accordingly, the etiology of chromosome segregation errors has long been studied. Conversely, while examples of environmental toxins impacting fertility can be found throughout the literature, this field is only recently becoming a major focus of research. The studies done for this dissertation were done independently from one another and are presented here separately. The observation of hermaphroditic mice on the inbred strain A/HeJ prompted the investigation of the YA/HeJ chromosome. The YA/HeJ chromosome was transferred to the C57BL/6J background and the hermaphroditism trait segregated with it, indicating the two are linked. We found the YA/HeJ chromosome to be prone to missegregation, however, we did not find evidence that segregation errors cause the disturbances in xii sexual differentiation. Interestingly, we frequently observed a gap between YA/HeJ sister chromatids, indicating inappropriate centromere function. The mouse Y centromere is near the
Recommended publications
  • X-Linked Recessive Inheritance
    X-LINKED RECESSIVE Fact sheet 09 INHERITANCE This fact sheet talks about how genes affect our health when they follow a well understood pattern of genetic inheritance known as X-linked recessive inheritance. The exception to this rule applies to the genes carried on the sex chromosomes called X and Y. IN SUMMARY The genes in our DNA provide the instructions • Genes contain the instructions for for proteins, which are the building blocks of the growth and development. Some gene cells that make up our body. Although we all have variations or changes may mean that variation in our genes, sometimes this can affect the gene does not work properly or works in a different way that is harmful. how our bodies grow and develop. • A variation in a gene that causes a Generally, DNA variations that have no impact health or developmental condition on our health are called benign variants or is called a pathogenic variant or polymorphisms. These variants tend to be more mutation. common in people. Less commonly, variations can change the gene so that it sends a different • If a genetic condition happens when message. These changes may mean that the gene a gene on the X chromosome has does not work properly or works in a different way a variation, this is called X-linked that is harmful. A variation in a gene that causes inheritance. a health or developmental condition is called a • An X-linked recessive gene is a gene pathogenic variant or mutation. located on the X chromosome and affects males and females differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity in the Organization of Centromeric Chromatin
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Diversity in the organization of centromeric chromatin 1 Florian A Steiner and Steven Henikoff Centromeric chromatin is distinguished primarily by lacking. In most species, cenH3 nucleosomes assemble nucleosomes containing the histone variant cenH3, which on particular families of tandemly repetitive satellite organizes the kinetochore that links the chromosome to the DNA, and the intractability of long satellite repeat arrays spindle apparatus. Whereas budding yeast have simple ‘point’ has greatly hindered the analysis of centromeric chroma- centromeres with single cenH3 nucleosomes, and fission yeast tin. Recent studies have begun to shed light on these have ‘regional’ centromeres without obvious sequence enigmatic regions of chromosomes, in part through specificity, the centromeres of most organisms are embedded improvements in sequencing technologies and in part in highly repetitive ‘satellite’ DNA. Recent studies have revealed through analysis of model systems that circumvent the a remarkable diversity in centromere chromatin organization challenges presented by the repeat-richness of most among different lineages, including some that have lost cenH3 higher eukaryotic centromeres. The emerging picture altogether. We review recent progress in understanding point, shows that cenH3 is incorporated into well-positioned regional and satellite centromeres, as well as less well-studied nucleosomes at centromeres that are distinct from canon- centromere types, such as holocentromeres.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetic Control of Mammalian Centromere Protein Binding: Does DNA Methylation Have a Role?
    Journal of Cell Science 109, 2199-2206 (1996) 2199 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1996 JCS3386 Epigenetic control of mammalian centromere protein binding: does DNA methylation have a role? Arthur R. Mitchell*, Peter Jeppesen, Linda Nicol†, Harris Morrison and David Kipling MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK *Author for correspondence (internet [email protected]) †Present address: MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, Edinburgh, UK SUMMARY Chromosome 1 of the inbred mouse strain DBA/2 has a block of minor satellite DNA sequences on chromosome 1. polymorphism associated with the minor satellite DNA at The binding of the CENP-E protein does not appear to be its centromere. The more terminal block of satellite DNA affected by demethylation of the minor satellite sequences. sequences on this chromosome acts as the centromere as We present a model to explain these observations. This shown by the binding of CREST ACA serum, anti-CENP- model may also indicate the mechanism by which the B and anti-CENP-E polyclonal sera. Demethylation of the CENP-B protein recognises specific sites within the arrays minor satellite DNA sequences accomplished by growing of minor satellite DNA on mouse chromosomes. cells in the presence of the drug 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine results in a redistribution of the CENP-B protein. This protein now binds to an enlarged area on the more terminal Key words: Centromere satellite DNA, Demethylation, Centromere block and in addition it now binds to the more internal antibody INTRODUCTION A common feature of many mammalian pericentromeric domains is that they contain families of repetitive DNA The centromere of mammalian chromosomes is recognised at sequences (Singer, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Human Chromosome‐Specific Aneuploidy Is Influenced by DNA
    Article Human chromosome-specific aneuploidy is influenced by DNA-dependent centromeric features Marie Dumont1,†, Riccardo Gamba1,†, Pierre Gestraud1,2,3, Sjoerd Klaasen4, Joseph T Worrall5, Sippe G De Vries6, Vincent Boudreau7, Catalina Salinas-Luypaert1, Paul S Maddox7, Susanne MA Lens6, Geert JPL Kops4 , Sarah E McClelland5, Karen H Miga8 & Daniele Fachinetti1,* Abstract Introduction Intrinsic genomic features of individual chromosomes can contri- Defects during cell division can lead to loss or gain of chromosomes bute to chromosome-specific aneuploidy. Centromeres are key in the daughter cells, a phenomenon called aneuploidy. This alters elements for the maintenance of chromosome segregation fidelity gene copy number and cell homeostasis, leading to genomic instabil- via a specialized chromatin marked by CENP-A wrapped by repeti- ity and pathological conditions including genetic diseases and various tive DNA. These long stretches of repetitive DNA vary in length types of cancers (Gordon et al, 2012; Santaguida & Amon, 2015). among human chromosomes. Using CENP-A genetic inactivation in While it is known that selection is a key process in maintaining aneu- human cells, we directly interrogate if differences in the centro- ploidy in cancer, a preceding mis-segregation event is required. It was mere length reflect the heterogeneity of centromeric DNA-depen- shown that chromosome-specific aneuploidy occurs under conditions dent features and whether this, in turn, affects the genesis of that compromise genome stability, such as treatments with micro- chromosome-specific aneuploidy. Using three distinct approaches, tubule poisons (Caria et al, 1996; Worrall et al, 2018), heterochro- we show that mis-segregation rates vary among different chromo- matin hypomethylation (Fauth & Scherthan, 1998), or following somes under conditions that compromise centromere function.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Knockdown of CENPA Reduces Sphere Forming Ability and Stemness of Glioblastoma Initiating Cells
    Neuroepigenetics 7 (2016) 6–18 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neuroepigenetics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/nepig Gene knockdown of CENPA reduces sphere forming ability and stemness of glioblastoma initiating cells Jinan Behnan a,1, Zanina Grieg b,c,1, Mrinal Joel b,c, Ingunn Ramsness c, Biljana Stangeland a,b,⁎ a Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, The Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway b Norwegian Center for Stem Cell Research, Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway c Vilhelm Magnus Laboratory for Neurosurgical Research, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway article info abstract Article history: CENPA is a centromere-associated variant of histone H3 implicated in numerous malignancies. However, the Received 20 May 2016 role of this protein in glioblastoma (GBM) has not been demonstrated. GBM is one of the most aggressive Received in revised form 23 July 2016 human cancers. GBM initiating cells (GICs), contained within these tumors are deemed to convey Accepted 2 August 2016 characteristics such as invasiveness and resistance to therapy. Therefore, there is a strong rationale for targeting these cells. We investigated the expression of CENPA and other centromeric proteins (CENPs) in Keywords: fi CENPA GICs, GBM and variety of other cell types and tissues. Bioinformatics analysis identi ed the gene signature: fi Centromeric proteins high_CENP(AEFNM)/low_CENP(BCTQ) whose expression correlated with signi cantly worse GBM patient Glioblastoma survival. GBM Knockdown of CENPA reduced sphere forming ability, proliferation and cell viability of GICs. We also Brain tumor detected significant reduction in the expression of stemness marker SOX2 and the proliferation marker Glioblastoma initiating cells and therapeutic Ki67.
    [Show full text]
  • 5885.Full.Pdf
    Research Article 5885 Assembly of additional heterochromatin distinct from centromere-kinetochore chromatin is required for de novo formation of human artificial chromosome Hiroshi Nakashima1,2,3, Megumi Nakano1,*, Ryoko Ohnishi1, Yasushi Hiraoka4, Yasufumi Kaneda2, Akio Sugino1,3 and Hiroshi Masumoto1,*,‡ 1Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan 2Division of Gene Therapy Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan 3Laboratories for Biomolecular Networks, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, 1-3 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan 4Kansai Advanced Research Center, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, 588-2 Iwaoka, Iwaoka-cho, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-2492, Japan *Present address: Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 37, Rm 5040, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA ‡Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 20 September 2005 Journal of Cell Science 118, 5885-5898 Published by The Company of Biologists 2005 doi:10.1242/jcs.02702 Summary Alpha-satellite (alphoid) DNA is necessary for de novo arms. However, on the stable HAC, chromatin formation of human artificial chromosomes (HACs) in immunoprecipitation analysis showed that HP1␣ and human cultured cells. To investigate the relationship trimethyl histone H3-K9 were enriched at the non- among centromeric, transcriptionally
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects & Overviews Meiotic Versus Mitotic Recombination: Two Different
    Prospects & Overviews Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: Two different routes for double-strand Review essays break repair The different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes Sabrina L. Andersen1) and Jeff Sekelsky1)2)Ã Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have vali- Introduction dated the major features of the double-strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of The existence of DNA recombination was revealed by the behavior of segregating traits long before DNA was identified the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are as the bearer of genetic information. At the start of the 20th produced. This success has led to this model being century, pioneering Drosophila geneticists studied the behav- invoked to explain double-strand break (DSB) repair in ior of chromosomal ‘‘factors’’ that determined traits such as other contexts. However, most non-crossover (NCO) eye color, wing shape, and bristle length. In 1910 Thomas Hunt recombinants generated during S. cerevisiae meiosis do Morgan published the observation that the linkage relation- not arise via a DSBR pathway. Furthermore, it is becom- ships of these factors were shuffled during meiosis [1]. Building on this discovery, in 1913 A. H. Sturtevant used ing increasingly clear that DSBR is a minor pathway for linkage analysis to determine the order of factors (genes) recombinational repair of DSBs that occur in mitotically- on a chromosome, thus simultaneously establishing that proliferating cells and that the synthesis-dependent genes are located at discrete physical locations along chromo- strand annealing (SDSA) model appears to describe somes as well as originating the classic tool of genetic map- mitotic DSB repair more accurately.
    [Show full text]
  • Centromere RNA Is a Key Component for the Assembly of Nucleoproteins at the Nucleolus and Centromere
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Letter Centromere RNA is a key component for the assembly of nucleoproteins at the nucleolus and centromere Lee H. Wong,1,3 Kate H. Brettingham-Moore,1 Lyn Chan,1 Julie M. Quach,1 Melisssa A. Anderson,1 Emma L. Northrop,1 Ross Hannan,2 Richard Saffery,1 Margaret L. Shaw,1 Evan Williams,1 and K.H. Andy Choo1 1Chromosome and Chromatin Research Laboratory, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute & Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia; 2Peter MacCallum Research Institute, St. Andrew’s Place, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia The centromere is a complex structure, the components and assembly pathway of which remain inadequately defined. Here, we demonstrate that centromeric ␣-satellite RNA and proteins CENPC1 and INCENP accumulate in the human interphase nucleolus in an RNA polymerase I–dependent manner. The nucleolar targeting of CENPC1 and INCENP requires ␣-satellite RNA, as evident from the delocalization of both proteins from the nucleolus in RNase-treated cells, and the nucleolar relocalization of these proteins following ␣-satellite RNA replenishment in these cells. Using protein truncation and in vitro mutagenesis, we have identified the nucleolar localization sequences on CENPC1 and INCENP. We present evidence that CENPC1 is an RNA-associating protein that binds ␣-satellite RNA by an in vitro binding assay. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, RNase treatment, and “RNA replenishment” experiments, we show that ␣-satellite RNA is a key component in the assembly of CENPC1, INCENP, and survivin (an INCENP-interacting protein) at the metaphase centromere.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Chromosome Chapter
    Chromosome 3 ©Chromosome Disorder Outreach Inc. (CDO) Technical genetic content provided by Dr. Iosif Lurie, M.D. Ph.D Medical Geneticist and CDO Medical Consultant/Advisor. Ideogram courtesy of the University of Washington Department of Pathology: ©1994 David Adler.hum_03.gif Introduction The size of chromosome 3 is ~200 Mb. Within this chromosome, there are thousands of genes, many of which are necessary for normal intellectual development or involved in the formation of body organs. Deletions of Chromosome 3 The length of the short arm of chromosome 3 is ~90 Mb. Most known deletions of 3p are caused by the loss of its distal 15 Mb segment (3p25–pter). Deletions of the more proximal segments are relatively rare; there are only ~50 reports on such patients. Therefore, it would be premature to talk about any syndrome related to deletions of the proximal part of 3p. The location of the breakpoints, size of deletion, and reported abnormalities are different in most described patients. However, recurrent aortal stenosis in patients with deletion 3p11p14.2, abnormal lung lobation in patients with deletion 3p12p14.2, agenesis or hypoplasia of the corpus callosum in patients with deletion 3p13, microphthalmia and coloboma in patients with deletion 3p13p21.1, choanal atresia and absent gallbladder in patients with deletion 3p13p21, and hearing loss in patients with deletion 3p14 are all indicators that the above–mentioned segments likely contain genes involved in the formation of these systems. Deletions of 3p Deletion of 3p25–pter The most distal segment of the short arm of chromosome 3 is 3p26 and spans ~8 Mb.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Independent Histories of the Human Y Chromosome and the Human Mitochondrial Chromosome
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 8 Print Reference: Pages 133-151 Article 7 2018 An Overview of the Independent Histories of the Human Y Chromosome and the Human Mitochondrial chromosome Robert W. Carter Stephen Lee University of Idaho John C. Sanford Cornell University, Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences School of Integrative Plant Science,Follow this Plant and Biology additional Section works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Carter, R.W., S.S. Lee, and J.C. Sanford. An overview of the independent histories of the human Y- chromosome and the human mitochondrial chromosome. 2018. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 133–151. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Carter, R.W., S.S. Lee, and J.C. Sanford. An overview of the independent histories of the human Y-chromosome and the human mitochondrial chromosome. 2018. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H.
    [Show full text]
  • 20P Deletions FTNW
    20p deletions rarechromo.org Deletions from chromosome 20p A chromosome 20p deletion is a rare genetic condition caused by the loss of material from one of the body’s 46 chromosomes. The material has been lost from the short arm (the top part in the diagram on the next page) of chromosome 20. Chromosomes are the structures in the nucleus of the body’s cells that carry the genetic information that controls development and function. In total every human individual normally has 46 chromosomes. Of these, two are a pair of sex chromosomes, XX (a pair of X chromosomes) in females and XY (one X chromosome and one Y chromosome) in males. The remaining 44 chromosomes are grouped in pairs. One chromosome from each pair is inherited from the mother while the other one is inherited from the father. Each chromosome has a short arm (called p) and a long arm (called q). Chromosome 20 is one of the smallest chromosomes in man. At present it is known to contain 737 genes out of the total of 20,000 to 25,000 genes in the human genome. You can’t see chromosomes with the naked eye, but if you stain them and magnify their image enough - about 850 times - you can see that each one has a distinctive pattern of light and dark bands. The diagram on the next page shows the bands of chromosome 20. These bands are numbered outwards starting from the point where the short and long arms meet (the centromere ). A low number, as in p11 in the short arm, is close to the centromere.
    [Show full text]
  • 4P Duplications
    4p Duplications rarechromo.org Sources 4p duplications The information A 4p duplication is a rare chromosome disorder in which in this leaflet some of the material in one of the body’s 46 chromosomes comes from the is duplicated. Like most other chromosome disorders, this medical is associated to a variable extent with birth defects, literature and developmental delay and learning difficulties. from Unique’s 38 Chromosomes come in different sizes, each with a short members with (p) and a long (q) arm. They are numbered from largest to 4p duplications, smallest according to their size, from number 1 to number 15 of them with 22, in addition to the sex chromosomes, X and Y. We a simple have two copies of each of the chromosomes (23 pairs), duplication of 4p one inherited from our father and one inherited from our that did not mother. People with a chromosome 4p duplication have a involve any other repeat of some of the material on the short arm of one of chromosome, their chromosomes 4. The other chromosome 4 is the who were usual size. 4p duplications are sometimes also called surveyed in Trisomy 4p. 2004/5. Unique is This leaflet explains some of the features that are the same extremely or similar between people with a duplication of 4p. grateful to the People with different breakpoints have different features, families who but those with a duplication that covers at least two thirds took part in the of the uppermost part of the short arm share certain core survey. features. References When chromosomes are examined, they are stained with a dye that gives a characteristic pattern of dark and light The text bands.
    [Show full text]