DOCSLIB.ORG

2Nd Quarter-2014.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Issue 73, 2nd Quarter 2014 JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Evolving Theory I SSUE for Cyberspace S EVENTY Educating Future -THREE, 2 Strategic Leaders ND Next Steps QUARTER 2014 in Targeting Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 73, 2nd Quarter 2014 http://ndupress.ndu.edu GEN Martin E. Dempsey, USA, Publisher MG Gregg F. Martin, USA, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Production Editor John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Photography Editor Martin J. Peters, Jr. Senior Copy Editor Calvin B. Kelley Art Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Printing Office Advisory Committee BG Guy T. Cosentino, USA/National War College; MG Anthony A. Cucolo III, USA/U.S. Army War College; Brig Gen Thomas H. Deale, USAF/Air Command and Staff College; Col Mark J. Desens, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; Lt Gen David L. Goldfein, USAF/The Joint Staff; BGen Thomas A. Gorry, USMC/ Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Maj Gen Scott M. Hanson, USAF/ Air War College; Col Jay L. Hatton, USMC/ Marine Corps War College; LTG David G. Perkins, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; RDML John W. Smith, Jr., USN/Joint Forces Staff College; LtGen Thomas D. Waldhauser, USMC/The Joint Staff Editorial Board Richard K. Betts/Columbia University; Stephen D. Chiabotti/School of Advanced Air and Space Studies; Eliot A. Cohen/The Johns Hopkins University; COL Joseph J. Collins, USA (Ret.)/National War College; Mark J. Conversino/Air War College; Thomas P. Ehrhard/Office of the Secretary of Defense; Aaron L. Friedberg/Princeton University; Col Thomas C. Greenwood, USMC (Ret.)/Office of the Secretary of Defense; Douglas N. Hime/Naval War College; Mark H. Jacobsen/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; Col Jerome M. Lynes, USMC (Ret.)/The Joint Staff; Kathleen Mahoney-Norris/Air Command and Staff College; Thomas L. McNaugher/Georgetown University; Col Mark Pizzo, USMC (Ret.)/National War College; James A. Schear/Office of the Secretary of Defense; LtGen Bernard E. Trainor, USMC (Ret.) Printed in St. Louis, Missouri, by Cover 2 images (top to bottom): Airman from 336th Fighter Squadron performs Missing Man Pull-up in flyover during internment ceremony of Brigadier General Robinson Risner at Arlington National Cemetery (U.S. Air Force); Marines reload M777 howitzer with 155 mm artillery shell during multiple-rounds fire mission as part of 2-day dual-fire training exercise at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii (U.S. Marine Corps/Matthew Bragg); UH-60M Black Hawk helicopter pilot and commander of C Company “War Lords,” 2nd Battalion (Assault), 10th Combat Aviation Brigade, Task Force Knighthawk, prepares cockpit prior to launching on personnel movement mission at Kabul International Airport (U.S. Army/Peter Smedberg). About the Cover In this Issue U.S. Navy divers assigned to Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit Dialogue 2, Company 2-2, lowered into water January 9, 2014, from 2 Letter Military Sealift Command rescue 4 In Memoriam and salvage ship USNS Grasp to search for missing Sailor of MH- 6 From the Chairman 53E Sea Dragon helicopter that 8 Are We Really Ever Off Duty? went down off coast of Virginia (U.S. Navy/Wyatt Huggett). Forum 10 Executive Summary 12 The Joint Force Commander’s Guide to Cyberspace Operations Joint Doctrine By Brett T. Williams 76 Sun Tzu in Contemporary Chinese Strategy 123 Cross-Domain Synergy: 20 Achieving Accountability By Fumio Ota Advancing Jointness in Cyberspace: Revolution By William O. Odom and or Evolution? 81 Geography Matters in Christopher D. Hayes By John N.T. Shanahan Maintaining Global Mobility By William M. Fraser III and 26 Combined Effects Power Marshall N. Ramsey By Ervin J. Rokke, Thomas A. Joint Force Quarterly is published by the National Defense University Press for the Chairman of the Drohan, and Terry C. Pierce Joint Chiefs of Staff. JFQ is the Chairman’s flagship Features joint military and security studies journal designed 32 Information-Sharing with to inform members of the U.S. Armed Forces, 86 Reflections on Operation allies, and other partners on joint and integrated the Private Sector Unified Protector operations; national security policy and strategy; By Veronica A. Chinn, Lee T. By Todd R. Phinney efforts to combat terrorism; homeland security; Furches, and Barian A. Woodward and developments in training and joint professional military education to transform America’s military and 93 Silent Watch: The Role of security apparatus to meet tomorrow’s challenges better while protecting freedom today. JPME Today Army Air and Missile Defense By Michael S. Tucker and NDU Press is the National Defense University’s 39 “Break Out”: A Plan for Better Robert W. Lyons cross-component, professional military and academic Equipping the Nation’s publishing house. Future Strategic Leaders 99 Leveraging U.S. Civilian The opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are those of the By Gregg F. Martin and Capabilities in Africa contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views John W. Yaeger By Charles D. “Buck” McDermott of the Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government. 44 Green Peace: Can Biofuels 105 The Case for the Junior Submissions and Communications Accelerate Energy Security? Joint Logistics Officer JFQ welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from members of the Armed Forces, security By John E. Gay Training Program policymakers and shapers, defense analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States and st By Wilson T. VornDick 52 Shaping a 21 -Century abroad. Submit articles for consideration by email to Defense Strategy: [email protected], with “Attention A&R Editor” in the subject line. Or write to: Reconciling Military Roles Recall By William G. Braun III 111 Dieppe All Over Again: The Editor, Joint Force Quarterly and Charles D. Allen Quandaries of Combined NDU Press 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 2504) Joint Operations Fort Lesley J. McNair 60 Targeting the JIIM Way: A Washington, DC 20319 More Inclusive Approach By Harald Høiback Telephone: (202) 685-4220/DSN 325 By John Bilas, Scott A. Hoffman, Email: [email protected] John S. Kolasheski, Kevin Book Reviews JFQ online: www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jfq/jfq.htm Toner, and Douglas Winton 118 Bolívar 2nd Quarter, April 2014 ISSN 1070-0692 Reviewed by Alan Gropman Commentary 68 Airpower and Globalization 119 The Revenge of Geography Effects: Rethinking Reviewed by Francis P. Sempa the Five Rings 120 Intelligence Collection By Michael W. Pietrucha Reviewed by Todd M. Manyx Police barrier at pro–European Union rally in Kiev attended by over 100,000, November 24, 2013 (Flickr/Ivan Bandura) Letter o the Editor: I write in response dragged through the streets or hung Churchill’s statement mentioned in their to Derek S. Reveron and James from a bridge, the Obama administration own article: “The statesman who yields T L. Cook’s article “From National would have quickly learned whether the to war fever must realize that once the to Theater: Developing Strategy” that American public was ready to see U.S. signal is given, he is no longer the master appeared in Joint Force Quarterly 70 Servicemembers dying for this cause. of policy but the slave of unforeseeable (3rd Quarter 2013). I agree whole- Looking back to March 27, 1999, in and uncontrollable events.” With a near- heartedly with the authors on their Serbia, when Lieutenant Colonel Dale peer adversary, it would not be surprising position that only “vital” national Zelko, flying an F-117A stealth fighter, if missile strikes triggered counterstrikes interests are worth dying for. However, was shot down by an SA-3 missile, we against U.S. forces or territory. But even I caution against accepting their idea should recognize that anytime American with a lesser foe, asymmetric warfare that national interests that are (merely) air crews fly into a combat zone, they might be employed to retaliate against “important” are necessarily worth risk being unable to fly home from that America in a way that caused casualties. killing for. mission. I suggest manned air strikes Second, if the country we strike has To begin, air strikes by manned should be flown only when U.S. vital na- not attacked the United States or an aircraft carry risks. Reveron and Cook tional interests are at stake since the crews ally—or we do not have a United Nations posit the 2011 North Atlantic Treaty risk death and cannot kill with absolute (UN) Security Council Resolution autho- Organization air campaign to prevent impunity. rizing the use of force against them—the genocide in Libya as worth killing for, It might be tempting to argue that United States would be committing but not worth dying for. But we have unmanned aircraft, cruise missiles, or bal- an illicit act of aggression that would to keep in mind that Major Kenneth listic missiles do not carry that same risk technically constitute initiating an act of Harney and Captain Tyler Stark had to and might satisfy this new criterion of im- war. While UN Ambassador and Pulitzer eject from their F-15E over Libya on portant interests that are worth killing for Prize–winner Samantha Power is an advo- March 21, 2011. If we had not safely but not worth dying for. That would be a cate of “R2P” (a responsibility to protect extracted them, and, instead, the U.S. grave error for at least two reasons. First, against genocide, war crimes, crimes public had watched video of their bodies the authors should consider Winston against humanity, and ethnic cleansing), 2 Dialogue / Letter JFQ 73, 2nd Quarter 2014 the third pillar of the R2P global norm unanimously adopted by heads of state and government at the 2005 UN World Summit states, “If a State is manifestly failing to protect its populations, the in- ternational community must be prepared to take appropriate collective action, in a timely and decisive manner and in accor- dance with the UN Charter.” In other words, R2P is expected to use the other instruments of national power, rather than military force, except when a UN Security Council Resolution authorizes that use of force.
Recommended publications
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy

    2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy

    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
  • Anastasi 2032

    Anastasi 2032

    Shashwat Goel & Ankita Phulia ​Anastasi 2032 Table of Contents Section Page Number 0 Introduction 2 1 Basic Requirements 4 2 Structural Design 15 3 Operations 31 4 Human Factors 54 5 Business 65 6 Bibliography 80 Fletchel Constructors 1 Shashwat Goel & Ankita Phulia ​Anastasi 2032 0 Introduction What is an underwater base doing in a space settlement design competition? Today, large-scale space habitation, and the opportunity to take advantage of the vast resources and possibilities of outer space, remains more in the realm of speculation than reality. We have experienced fifteen years of continuous space habitation and construction, with another seven years scheduled. Yet we have still not been able to take major steps towards commercial and industrial space development, which is usually the most-cited reason for establishing orbital colonies. This is mainly due to the prohibitively high cost, even today. In this situation, we cannot easily afford the luxury of testing how such systems could eventually work in space. This leaves us looking for analogous situations. While some scientists have sought this in the mountains of Hawaii, this does not tell the full story. We are unable to properly fathom or test how a large-scale industrial and tourism operation, as it is expected will eventually exist on-orbit, on Earth. This led us to the idea of building an oceanic base. The ocean is, in many ways, similar to free space. Large swathes of it remain unexplored. There are unrealised commercial opportunities. There are hostile yet exciting environments. Creating basic life support and pressure-containing structures are challenging.
  • Introduction to Sonar, Navy Training Course. INSTITUTION Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, R

    Introduction to Sonar, Navy Training Course. INSTITUTION Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, R

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 070 572 SE 014 119 TITLE Introduction to Sonar, Navy Training Course. INSTITUTION Bureau of Naval Personnel, Washington, R. C.-; Naval Personnel Program Support Activity, Washington, D. C. REPORT NO NAVPERS -10130 -B PUB DATE 68 NOTE 186p.; Revised 1968 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Acoustics; Instructional Materials; *Job Training; *Military Personnel; Military Science; Military Training; Physics; *Post Secondary Education; *Supplementary Textbooks ABSTRACT Fundamentals of sonar systems are presented in this book, prepared for both regular navy and naval reserve personnel who are seeking advancement in rating. An introductory description is first made of submarines and antisubmarine units. Determination of underwater targets is analyzed from the background of true and relative bearings, true and relative motion, and computation of target angles. Then, applications of both active and passive sonars are explained in connection with bathythesmographs, fathometers, tape recorders, fire control techniques, tfiternal and external communications systems, maintenance actions, test methods and equipment, and safety precautions. Basic principles of sound and temperature effects on wave propagation are also discussed. Illustrations for explanation use, information on training films and the sonar technician rating structure are also provided.. (CC) -^' U.S DEPARTMENT OFHEALTH. EDUCATION 14 WELFARE OFFICE OF EOUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HASBEEN REPRO OUCED EXACTLY ASRECEIVED FROM THE PERSON ORORGANIZATION ORIG INATING IT POINTS OFVIEW OR OPIN IONS STATED 00NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICEDF EDU CATION POSITION ORPOLICY 1-1:1444646- 1 a 7 ero AIM '440, a 40 ;13" : PREFACE. This book is written for themen of the U. S. Navy and Naval Reserve who are seeking advancement in theSonar Technician rating.
  • Jeannie Leavitt, MWAOHI Interview Transcript

    Jeannie Leavitt, MWAOHI Interview Transcript

    MILITARY WOMEN AVIATORS ORAL HISTORY INITIATIVE Interview No. 14 Transcript Interviewee: Major General Jeannie Leavitt, United States Air Force Date: September 19, 2019 By: Lieutenant Colonel Monica Smith, USAF, Retired Place: National Air and Space Museum South Conference Room 901 D Street SW, Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20024 SMITH: I’m Monica Smith at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. Today is September 19, 2019, and I have the pleasure of speaking with Major General Jeannie Leavitt, United States Air Force. This interview is being taped as part of the Military Women Aviators Oral History Initiative. It will be archived at the Smithsonian Institution. Welcome, General Leavitt. LEAVITT: Thank you. SMITH: So let’s start by me congratulating you on your recent second star. LEAVITT: Thank you very much. SMITH: You’re welcome. You’re welcome. So you just pinned that [star] on this month. Is that right? LEAVITT: That’s correct, effective 2 September. SMITH: Great. Great. So that’s fantastic, and we’ll get to your promotions and your career later. I just have some boilerplate questions. First, let’s just start with your full name and your occupation. LEAVITT: Okay. Jeannie Marie Leavitt, and I am the Commander of Air Force Recruiting Service. SMITH: Fantastic. So when did you first enter the Air Force? LEAVITT: I was commissioned December 1990, and came on active duty January 1992. SMITH: Okay. And approximately how many total flight hours do you have? LEAVITT: Counting trainers, a little over 3,000. SMITH: And let’s list, for the record, all of the aircraft that you have piloted.
  • Spacesuits Have Been Created, but We Want to Go Further

    Spacesuits Have Been Created, but We Want to Go Further

    Science and Innovation A Boeing/Teaching Channel Partnership EXTREME BIOSUITS Student Handbook Science and Innovation Extreme Biosuits Student Handbook Engineering Design Process Step 1 Identify the Need or Problem Describe the engineering design challenge to be solved. Include the limits and constraints, customer description, and an explanation of why solving this challenge is important. Step 2 Research Criteria and Constraints Research how others have solved this or similar problems, and discover what materials have been used. Be sure to thoroughly research the limitations and design requirements for success. Step 3 Brainstorm Possible Solutions Use your knowledge and creativity to generate as many solutions as possible. During this brainstorming stage, do not reject any ideas. Step 4 Select the Best Solution Each team member presents their solution ideas to the team. Team members annotate how each solution does or does not meet each design requirement. The team then agrees on a solution, or combination of solutions, that best meets the design requirements. Step 5 Construct a Prototype Develop an operating version of the solution. Step 6 Test Test your solution. Annotate the results from each test to share with your team. Step 7 Present Results Present the results from each test to the team. Step 8 Redesign Determine a redesign to address failure points and/or design improvements. The design process involves multiple iterations and redesigns. Redesign is based on the data from your tests, your team discussions as to the next steps to improve the design, and the engineering design process Steps 1 through 7. Once your team is confident of a prototype solution, you present the results to the client.
  • Mark V Diving Helmet

    Mark V Diving Helmet

    Historical Diver, Number 5, 1995 Item Type monograph Publisher Historical Diving Society U.S.A. Download date 06/10/2021 19:38:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30848 IDSTORI DIVER The Offical Publication of the Historical Diving Society U.S.A. Number 5 Summer 1995 "Constant and incessant jerking and pulling on the signal line or pipe, by the Diver, signifies that he must be instantly pulled up .... " THE WORLDS FIRST DIVING MANUAL Messrs. C.A. and John Deane 1836 "c:lf[{[J a:tk o{ eadz. u.adn l;t thi:1- don't di£ wllfzoul fz.a1Jin5 Co't'towe.J, dofen, pwu!.hau:d O'l made a hefmd a{ :toorh, to gfimju.e (o'r. !JOU'tul{ thl:1 new wo'l.fJ''. 'Wifl'iam 'Bube, "'Beneath 'J,opic dlw;" 1928 HISTORICAL DIVING SOCIETY HISTORICAL DIVER MAGAZINE USA The official publication of the HDSUSA A PUBLIC BENEFIT NON-PROFIT CORPORATION HISTORICAL DIVER is published three times a year C/0 2022 CLIFF DRIVE #119 by the Historical Diving Society USA, a Non-Profit SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93109 U.S.A. Corporation, C/0 2022 Cliff Drive #119 Santa Barbara, (805) 963-6610 California 93109 USA. Copyright© 1995 all rights re­ FAX (805) 962-3810 served Historical Diving Society USA Tel. (805) 963- e-mail HDSUSA@ AOL.COM 6610 Fax (805) 962-3810 EDITORS: Leslie Leaney and Andy Lentz. Advisory Board HISTORICAL DIVER is compiled by Lisa Glen Ryan, Art Bachrach, Ph.D. J. Thomas Millington, M.D. Leslie Leaney, and Andy Lentz.
  • Naval Postgraduate School Graduation Exercises / August 1966

    Naval Postgraduate School Graduation Exercises / August 1966

    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Institutional Publications Commencement Ceremony programs 1966-08 Naval Postgraduate School Graduation Exercises / August 1966 Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/41168 ffealualion 8%1Jc1s1s o/IJ1 W11il1/ 8/al1s ;llaua/Posl9t1aluale 8cJoo/ 011 Wfeln1slay, vf11911sl /Ji1/ vlkn1/1111 J1111'41Isi.¥ly-s1% vf/o11l1t11y, Cali/ot1111a /JJP9Aam y INVOCATION Captain SAMUEL D. CHAMBERS, CHC, USNR INTRODUCTION OF SPEAKER Rear Admiral EDWARD J. O'DONNELL, USN Superintendent, United States Naval Postgraduate School ADDRESS TO GRADUATES Mr. CHARLES A. CHA YNE Former Vice-President, Engineering Staff, General Motors Corporation PRESENTATION OF DISTINGUISHED PROFESSOR MEDALLION to Professor AUSTIN R. FREY AWARDING OF DIPLOMAS Rear Admiral EDWARD J. O'DONNELL, USN CONFERRING OF DEGREES PRESENTATION OF CANDIDATES Professor JAMES M. FREMGEN Chairman, Department of Business Administration and Economics Professor EUGENE C. CRITTENDEN, Jr. Chairman, Department of Physics Professor JACK R. BORSTIN'G Chairman, Department of Operations Analysis Professor RICHARD W. BELL Chairman, Department of Aeronautics Professor GILBERT F. KINNEY Chairman, Department of Material Science and Chemistry REQUIREMENTS Dean ROBERT F. RINEHART Academic Dean, United States Naval Postgraduate School CONFERRING OF DEGREES Rear Admiral EDWARD J. O'DONNELL, USN BENEDICTION Commander FRANCIS J. FITZPATRICK, CHC, USN c JAe ffialuales Those officers whose names are preceded by a star (*) are graduated In Absentia ~ Diplomas of Completion Management Lieutenant Commander Louis F. BESIO, USN Staff, Commander Destroyer Squadron TWENTY-FOUR *Lieutenant Commander Joseph M. CULBERT, Jr., USN Navy School, Transportation Management, Oakland, California Lieutenant Commander Julia J. DiLORENZO, USN Staff, Chief Naval Air Advanced Training, Corpus Christi, Texas Lieutenant Commander Donald E.
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012

    US Navy Program Guide 2012

    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
  • Air Force Training: Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness, GAO-16-635SU (Washington, D.C.: Aug

    Air Force Training: Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness, GAO-16-635SU (Washington, D.C.: Aug

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees September 2016 AIR FORCE TRAINING Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness GAO-16-864 September 2016 AIR FORCE TRAINING Further Analysis and Planning Needed to Improve Effectiveness Highlights of GAO-16-864, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found For more than a decade, the Air Force The Air Force establishes combat aircrew training requirements for the full range focused its training on supporting of core missions based on an annual process, but these requirements may not operations in the Middle East. The Air reflect current and emerging training needs, because the Air Force has not Force has established goals for its comprehensively reassessed the assumptions underlying them. Specifically, combat aircrews to conduct training for assumptions about the total annual live-fly sortie requirements by aircraft, the the full range of core missions. Both criteria for designating aircrews as experienced or inexperienced, and the mix the Senate and House Reports between live and simulator training have remained the same since 2012. For accompanying bills for the FY 2016 example, Air Combat Command has set the same minimum number of live-fly National Defense Authorization Act sortie requirements across aircraft platforms, but has not conducted the analysis included a provision for GAO to review needed to determine if requirements should differ based on the number of core the Air Force’s training plans. missions for each platform. Reassessing the assumptions underlying annual This report discusses the extent to training requirements would better position the Air Force to meet its stated goals which the Air Force has (1) determined for its forces to achieve a range of missions for current and emerging threats.
  • America's Military Reserve in the All-Volunteer Era: from Strategic To

    America's Military Reserve in the All-Volunteer Era: from Strategic To

    America’s Military Reserve in the All-Volunteer Era: From Strategic to Operational Adapted from remarks by Maj. Gen. Jeffrey E. Phillips, U.S. Army (Ret.), at the March 28 All- Volunteer Force Forum Conference 2019, Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas Good afternoon and thank you for the invitation to once again be in my adopted Lone Star State, whose beloved name, as all who have lived here know, is spelled without an “A” – Tex-Iss. My friend Maj. Gen. Denny Laich [who had spoken earlier in the conference] has occupied a leading role in the All-Volunteer Force reality show; his work on the topic defines the argument that the AVF is inadequate for the nation’s future – and that now is the time to seriously explore what we should do about the situation. We owe him our thanks for his dedication to the continued security of our nation and the well- being of those who serve in our military. The Pentagon, in its November 2018 end-of-year report on recruiting and retention, disclosed some deficiencies that reinforce any perception that the all-volunteer force is in trouble. The U.S. Army’s accessions were nearly 7,000 under its already reduced annual goal. Neither the Army National Guard nor the Army Reserve made their recruiting goal – the Army Reserve missing by nearly 30 percent. None of the three made their number. The Air National Guard and the Navy Reserve also failed to make their recruiting goals. DoD officials on a budget conference call earlier this month explained that increased enlistment bonuses, more and better advertising, better coordination of marketing, and more and better recruiting would make the difference.
  • California State Military Reserve Establishes Maritime Component By: MAJ(CA)K.J

    California State Military Reserve Establishes Maritime Component By: MAJ(CA)K.J

    SPRING SDF Times 2017 Coming Soon! Presidents Message SDF Times - Next Edition 30 July 2017 Submission Deadline Our State Defense Forces stand at the threshold of even greater opportunity to serve our states and nation. The confluence of our federal budget crisis, state Items for Annual Conference Board Consideration budget difficulties, increased extreme weather systems and threats of terrorism, 1 August 2017 provide a challenging environment that our troops can provide a meaningful solu- Submission Deadline tion. We now have an established track record of excellence upon which we can build an even more elite force. 2017 SGAUS Annual Conference 21-24 September 2017 Myrtle Beach, SC Members of SGAUS, as you may know, I have just come off of a Chaplain Training & Conference 21-23 September 2017 whirlwind U.S. congressional cam- Myrtle Beach, SC paign launched with broad-based support. It was an extraordinary PAO/PIO Training & Conference 22 September 2017 experience in which the great suc- Myrtle Beach, SC cess of our South Carolina State Guard was made an issue. Judge Advocate & Engineer We enjoyed particularly strong Training & Conference 22-23 September 2017 support among military veterans Myrtle Beach, SC throughout the district and across the state. And we received MEMS & Medical Conference 23 September 2017 the published endorsements of Myrtle Beach, SC several of those veterans, includ- ing two MEDAL OF HONOR recipients – Maj. Gen. Jim SGAUS Stipend, Scholarship, & Soldier/NCO/Officer of the Year Livingston, U.S. Marine Corps (Ret.) and LT Mike Thornton, U.S. Navy SEALs (Ret.). Program Their stories by the way, like all recipients of our nation’s highest award for com- 15 March 2018 bat valor, are beyond remarkable.
  • Major General Darryl Roberson

    Major General Darryl Roberson

    U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E MAJOR GENERAL DARRYL ROBERSON Maj. Gen. Darryl Roberson is the Vice Director, Operations (J-3), Joint Staff, the Pentagon, Washington, D.C. The Vice Director for Operations serves as the principle assistant to the Director for Operations in assisting the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in fulfilling his responsibilities as the principle military advisor to the President and Secretary of Defense, in developing and providing operational guidance, and in fostering clear communication between the President, Secretary of Defense, Unified Commands, and Services. General Roberson is a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy and Euro-NATO Joint Jet pilot training. He has been a Thunderbird air demonstration pilot, a Congressional Fellow on Capitol Hill and has served on the Air Staff and the Joint Staff at the Pentagon. He has commanded an operational squadron and group, an expeditionary group, an operational wing at Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany, a training wing at Tyndall AFB, and an Air Expeditionary Wing at Bagram, Afghanistan. He has flown combat missions in Iraq during Operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom as well as 100 missions in Afghanistan while commanding the 455th AEW during Operation Enduring Freedom. General Roberson is a command pilot who has more than 5,000 flight hours including 865 combat hours. He has flown the F-4, F-15, F-16, and F-22. EDUCATION 1983 Bachelor of Science degree in Aeronautical Engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colo.