DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected Speeches of President Moon Jae-In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SELECTED SPEECHES SELECTED Moon Jae-in President of the Republic of Korea SELECTED Ⅲ SPEECHES Ⅲ May 10, 2019 Moon Jae-in President of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of President Jae-in Moon − May 10, 2020 Moon Jae-in President of the Republic of Korea SELECTED SPEECHES Ⅲ May 10, 2019 − May 10, 2020 Special Talk with President to Mark Two Years in Office May 9, 2019 1 2. Address at Sweden’s Riksdag June 14, 2019 3. “Manufacturing Renaissance Vision” Declaration Ceremony June 19, 2019 4. Welcoming Dinner for U.S. President Donald Trump at Cheong Wa Dae June 29, 2019 3 2 4 5 6 5. Visit to Parts and Materials Production Site August 7, 2019 6. 74th Liberation Day Ceremony August 15, 2019 7. Address at United Nations Climate Action Summit September 23, 2019 7 9 10 8. 71st Armed Forces Day Ceremony October 1, 2019 9. Foreign Diplomatic Corps Reception at Cheong Wa Dae October 18, 2019 10. Town Hall 2019: Answering People's Question November 19, 2019 8 11. Welcoming Dinner for 2019 ASEAN-ROK Commemorative Summit in Busan November 25, 2019 12. ASEAN-ROK Commemorative Summit November 26, 2019 13. 1st Mekong-ROK Summit November 27, 2019 11 12 13 14. 2020 New Year Press Conference January 14, 2020 15. Pan-Government COVID-19 Countermeasures Meeting February 23, 2020 16. 101st March First Independence Movement Day Ceremony March 1, 2020 14 15 16 Preface We have compiled the speeches and remarks delivered to the people by the President Inter-Korean relations did not see very much progress last year, but the fact that our people during the third year of the Moon Jae-in Administration. This volume is a history and could experience actual inter-Korean reconciliation through the opening of the DMZ record of how each and every day of the past year has been dynamic and in desperate need Peace Trail was by no means a small advancement. President Moon has briskly engaged of national unity. The President’s compassionate concern for the people can be felt more in diplomacy on multiple international fronts to promote peace on the Korean Peninsula strongly and ardently than ever. and diversify trade. The most meaningful achievement was enhancing Korea’s global status by successfully hosting the ASEAN-Republic of Korea Commemorative Summit and the As we marked the 100th anniversary of both the March First Independence Movement and Mekong-Republic of Korea Summit. the founding of the Provisional Republic of Korea Government last year, we ushered in the New Year by taking on a challenge to build a nation in which all of the people prosper However, what we must remember the most is how the people have voluntarily participated together. Even though we faced an economic crisis caused by Japan’s export restrictions, our in the efforts to overcome COVID-19 and how medical professionals have dedicated people turned that crisis into an opportunity. We have achieved the localized production of themselves to testing and treatment. Many parts of these speeches contain the President’s materials, parts and equipment. In the spirit of the March First Independence Movement, gratitude and sense of pride in the people. I, too, would like to express here my respect for we have also laid the solid foundation for a nation that cannot be shaken. our people who are surmounting the crisis with a high level of civic consciousness. The improvements in three key employment indicators amid difficult domestic and Compiled in this third volume of President Moon’s speeches are his major addresses, international economic conditions are attributable to the people, who have patiently remarks from meetings and events released from May 10, 2019, to May 10, 2020. These maintained their trust in the Government’s policies. The Government has made significant reflect a new Republic of Korea that the people have created together. This collection will efforts to promote new industries, a fair economy and innovative growth while labor, remain as a chronicle of not just the remarks of the President but vivid accounts of the management and local governments have joined forces to create mutually beneficial local people and how they continue on with their lives. jobs. Through this process, hope has risen that we can emerge as an inclusive nation, and confidence has been gained that Korea can take the lead in the era of the Fourth Industrial The Moon Jae-in Administration will always stand together with the people on the basis of Revolution. mutual benefit and solidarity. For the remaining two years, we will do everything we can to faithfully record the lives of the people day after day to make the proud history of the Republic of Korea. May 2020 Noh Young-min Chief of Staff to the President Notes 1. This volume of selected speeches by the President in his third year in office categorizes major events from the past year. To help readers gain a more comprehensive and multi-dimensional understanding about overall state affairs, the category has been divided into main topics and sub topics. For a chronological list of the speeches, please check the index in the last chapter of this volume. 2. In this volume, all place names and those personal names are spelled in accordance with the Revised Romanization of Korean by the National Institute of Korean Language. Ex) PyeongChang (평창), Panmunjeom (판문점) 3. The full standard names of provinces and other places on the Korean Peninsula are romanized according to Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism guidelines (so nonnative speakers are able to pronounce the names in ways the Korean population can readily understand). In the first reference, key Korean descriptive words appear again in translation for clarity. Afterward, the translated portions are removed to avoid needless repetition. Ex) “경상북도” and “백두산” are “Gyeongsangbuk-do Province” and “Baekdusan Mountain” upon first reference, but simply “Gyeongsangbuk-do” and “Baekdusan” thereafter. Contents 026 Special Address by President Moon Jae-in 124 Response to COVID-19 to Mark Three Years in Office 126 01 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Meeting to Check Measures against New Coronavirus Infections 130 02 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Meeting with His Senior Secretaries 134 03 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 5th Cabinet Meeting 038 Anniversaries of National Events 138 04 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Special Meeting in Daegu for COVID-19 Countermeasures 040 01 Address by President Moon Jae-in on 39th Anniversary of May 18 140 05 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 1st Emergency Gwangju Democratization Movement Economic Council Meeting 047 02 Address by President Moon Jae-in on 64th Memorial Day 144 06 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 2nd Emergency Economic Council Meeting 055 03 Address by President Moon Jae-in on Korea’s 74th Liberation Day 147 07 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Meeting with Producers of 066 04 Address by President Moon Jae-in at 71st Armed Forces Day COVID-19 Diagnostic Kits Approved for Emergency Use 072 05 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 40th Anniversary of Busan-Masan 150 08 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at G20 2020 Extraordinary Virtual Democratic Protests Leaders Summit 078 06 2020 New Year’s Address by President Moon Jae-in 154 09 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 3rd Emergency Economic Council Meeting 091 07 Address by President Moon Jae-in on 101st March First Independence Movement Day 157 10 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in during Visit to Gumi National Industrial Complex 099 08 Address by President Moon Jae-in on 5th West Sea Defense Day 161 11 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Meeting to Discuss Provision of 104 09 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 72nd Anniversary Memorial Emergency Financing to Businesses and Microbusiness Owners Ceremony in Honor of Victims of Jeju April 3 Incident 164 12 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 4th Emergency 111 10 Address by President Moon Jae-in on 101st Anniversary of Founding of Economic Council Meeting Provisional Republic of Korea Government 168 13 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Joint Meeting with Industry, 118 11 Address by President Moon Jae-in on 60th Anniversary of April 19 Academia, Research Institutions and Hospitals to Develop COVID-19 Revolution Treatments and Vaccine Contents 172 14 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Special ASEAN Plus Three Summit Innovative Growth 176 15 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 5th Emergency 233 08 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Biohealth National Vision Economic Council Meeting Proclamation Ceremony (9th Stop of Nationwide Economic Tour: Chungcheongbuk-do Province) 180 16 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 22nd Cabinet Meeting 239 09 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Manufacturing Renaissance Vision Declaration Ceremony 247 10 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Presentation of Three Strategies for Innovative Content Industry 184 Economy 253 11 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Signing Ceremony for Samsung Display’s New Investment Agreement 258 12 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Presentation of New Maritime and Economic Policy Fishing Industry Innovation Strategy 186 01 Opening Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at 2019 National Fiscal 263 13 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Future Car Industry National Strategy Meeting Vision Declaration Ceremony 192 02 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Korea’s 2nd Social Economy Fair 269 14 Remarks by President Moon Jae-in at Eco-friendly Automobile Export Port 198 03 Address by President Moon Jae-in at National Assembly to
Recommended publications
  • South Korea Section 3

    South Korea Section 3

    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
  • 3 Nami MAKINO.Indd

    3 Nami MAKINO.Indd

    29 The Place which Sustains the Imagination of a “Nation” : The Seoul National Cemetery Nami MAKINO Tokyo University of Foreign Studies Introduction The Seoul National Cemetery, called Hyeonchungwong in Korean, which is the fi rst national cemetery in South Korea, is located in the middle of Seoul, the capital of South Korea. This cemetery (which has symmetrical position with the Ministry of National Defense separated the Hangang River) was established in 1955 as a national military cemetery for glorifying the fallen soldiers who had been died in Korean War, which had been fought between South and North Korea in 1950-1953. Ten years later, it was elevated to the status of national cemetery in 1965. The site of this cemetery is 1,430,000m2 (343 acres) and there 171,450 persons are enshrined as patriot martyrs. Approximately 104,000 soldiers whose bodies were not found are enshrined with memorial tablets in the Memorial Hall and 7000 unknown soldiers whose bodies were found are buried in the grave area of the cemetery. National military cemeteries were born at fi rst in Europe where citizens began to have more important roles as volunteers than mercenaries who hired out as fi ghters in the wars. The First World War, which was the fi rst modern war in the world, brought the dead of unprecedented 13,000,000. Because the most of the dead of this war consisted of volunteers and soldiers who were conscripted from every corner of a country by force, that is, they were citizens and members of a “nation”, so their suffering should be healed and their death should be regarded as meaningful death in order to justify the war.
  • The Four Asian Dragon's Significance in World Economic Development

    The Four Asian Dragon's Significance in World Economic Development

    Bhatia Nikhil, Gupta Ishan, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. ISSN: 2454-132X Impact factor: 4.295 (Volume 4, Issue 1) Available online at www.ijariit.com The Four Asian Dragon's Significance in World Economic Development Nikhil Bhatia Ishan Gupta [email protected] [email protected] Christ University, Bangalore, Karnataka Christ University, Bangalore, Karnataka ABSTRACT This paper analyses the contribution of four Asian Dragons towards International Economic System from 1965-2017 and reveals insight into related trends and patterns. The paper shows how four Asian dragons (Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, and Hong Kong) have grown since Independence to Industrialisation. Lastly, reasons for their slowing growth. This study is divided into four parts. Firstly, the growth pattern of GDP and Exports in these countries. Secondly, factors leading to this growth. Thirdly, how Industrialisation of four dragons helped world economy during currency fluctuations and recession. Fourthly, reasons for declining growth of these nations. The study discusses the challenges facing four Dragon’s sharply declining growth rate and proposes policy approaches that might help boost the country’s growth in the future. Keywords: Asian Dragon, International Economic System, GDP. 1. INTRODUCTION Four Asian Dragons The countries that come under are Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, they had gone through rapid industrialisation and had high growth rate i.e. more than 7 percent a year between the 1960s and 1990s. By the 21st century, all the countries had developed into an advanced and high-income nation, industrialised and developed countries specialising in the areas of competitive advantage.
  • The Commemoration of Gwanju

    The Commemoration of Gwanju

    The Commemoration of Gwangju: Who is the Enemy of the State? Hang KIM (University of Tokyo) There can be nothing more instructive towards loyalty and justice than will be the memory, while it lasts, of that war. – Thomas Hobbes 1. Through Burying, Distinguish the Enemy from the Friend The modern nation states have sustained their lives through the reproduction of the historical memories originated in various wars in order to secure their nations. In that sense, a national cemetery has functioned as an institution that converts a death compelled by the state into a sacrifice dedicated for the nation. At the heart of this logic lies the distinction between them and us, that is, the enemy and the friend. For instance, the Yasukuni Shrine, which will be analyzed by Professor Tetsuya Takahashi tomorrow, has shaped the historical memory of modern Japan. It was established for the commemoration of the fallen soldiers for the Meiji reformation government in civil war occurred in 1867. This commemoration enabled the Meiji state to define the troops of Bakuhu or the former government of Japan as nation’s enemy. Since then, the latter has been excluded from the narrative of Japan’s historical memory. Thus, the primordial function of the Yasukuni Shrine for the state is to distinguish the enemy from the friend with incessantly reproducing the historical memory of Japan as a nation. Then, what if the friend and the enemy are simultaneously commemorated by the very same nation state? The contemporary history of South Korea tells us that such a paradoxical situation may exist.
  • 2019 Annual Report

    2019 Annual Report

    Table of Contents A Message from the Chairman.............................................................. 1 A Message from the President .............................................................. 3 Our Impact .................................................................................... 4 What’s Unique About Sister Cities International?....................................... 5 Global Leaders Circle............................................................................... 6 2018 Activities....................................................................................... 7 Where We Are (Partnership Maps) ........................................................ 14 Membership with Sister Cities International ........................................... 18 Looking for a Sister City Partner?......................................................... 19 Membership Resources and Discounts ................................................. 20 Youth Leadership Programs ............................................................... 21 YAAS 2018 Winners & Finalists ............................................................ 23 2018 Youth Leadership Summit .......................................................... 24 Sister Cities International’s 2018 Annual Conference in Aurora, Colorado.......................................................................... 26 Annual Awards Program Winners......................................................... 27 Special Education and Virtual Learning in the United States and Palestine (SEVLUP)
  • Experiencing South Korea FPRI/Korea Society 2015 Korean

    Experiencing South Korea FPRI/Korea Society 2015 Korean

    Experiencing South Korea FPRI/Korea Society 2015 Korean Presidents: an Evaluation of Effective Leadership Author: Ellen Resnek: Downingtown East High School Lesson Overview: Through the use of various primary and secondary sources, students in this lesson will identify, understand and be able to explain the Korean President Power Ranking: Technically, the Republic of Korea has had ten heads of government since its birth in 1948: (1) Syngmn Rhee (1948-1960); (2) Chang Myon (1960-1961); (3) Park Chung-hee (1961-1979); (4) Choi Gyu-ha (1979-1980); (5) Chun Doo-hwan (1980-1987); (6) Roh Tae-woo (1987-1992); (7) Kim Young-sam (1992-1997); (8) Kim Dae-jung (1997-2002); (9) Roh Moo-hyun (2002-2007) ; (10) Lee Myeong-bak (2007-2012).; and Park Geun-hye, 2013–current. But one can see that Chang Myon and Choi Gyu-ha did not last very long, because they abdicated from their posts when their successors rolled into Seoul with tanks. Objectives: 1. Students will learn background information regarding Korean President Power 2. Students will develop an appreciation of people who have helped shape the history and culture of Korea. 3. Students will become aware of some of the most important events in Korean history. 4. Students will examine various leadership styles and determine those the students might want to emulate. Materials Required Handouts provided Computers for research While this lesson is complete in itself, it can be enriched by books on Korea and updated regularly by checking the Internet for current information. Experiencing South Korea FPRI/Korea Society 2015 Procedure: Lesson Objectives: Students will be able to: Evaluate authors’ differing points of view on the same historical event or issue by assessing the authors’ claims, reasoning, and evidence Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in analyzing how style and content contribute to the power, persuasiveness, or beauty of the text.
  • South Korea: Defense White Paper 2010

    South Korea: Defense White Paper 2010

    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
  • 49,80 % 26.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (1R) Querrrey-Londero 1 1,20 1:3 KO NE 26.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (1R) Čepelová-Hsieh S.W

    49,80 % 26.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (1R) Querrrey-Londero 1 1,20 1:3 KO NE 26.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (1R) Čepelová-Hsieh S.W

    Datum Místo konání události Zápas Tip Kurs Výsl. Stav FREE TIPY 17.08.2019 ATP WINSTOM SALEM (Q) Chrysosos - Peliwo 1 2,11 2:0 OK ANO Úspěšnost 65,80 % 17.08.2019 CORDENONS (SF) Eriksson-Jahn 2 1,44 0:2 OK ANO 17.08.2019 ITK KOKSIJDE (SF) Soderlung-Geens 1 1,37 2:0 OK ANO Podaných tipů: Vyhraných: 18.08.2019 ITK KOKSIJDE (F) Onclin-Soderlung 2 1,41 0:2 OK ANO Prohraných: Nevyhodnocených 18.08.2019 CORDENONS (F) Jahn-O´Connell 1 1,64 0:2 KO ANO 19.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Molleker-Torpegaard 2 1,54 0:2 OK ANO 367 0 19.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Nadna-Otte 2 1,35 0:2 OK ANO 19.08.2019 L´AAQUILLA CHALL. (2K) Seyboth Wild-Belluci 1 1,39 2:0 OK ANO 1073 20.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Vatutin-Couacaud 2 1,36 0:2 OK ANO 20.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Caruso-Chung 1 1,39 2:0 OK ANO 706 21.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Kavčič-Uchiyama 2 1,61 0:2 OK ANO 21.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Kwon Soon Woo-Otte 1 1,23 2:0 OK ANO 21.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Torpegaard-Galan D. 1 1,46 1:2 KO ANO 21.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Barrere-Milojevic 1 1,53 2:1 OK ANO 22.08.2019 ITF POZNAŇ (2R) Mridha-Sakamoto 1 3,25 2:0 OK NE 22.08.2019 ITF POZNAŇ (2R) Vellotti-Oliveiri 1 1,63 2:1 OK NE 22.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Caruso-Rosol 1 1,45 0:2 KO NE 22.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Bemmelmans-Ivashka 2 1,38 0:2 OK NE 23.08.2019 ITF SANTANDER (QF) Luz-Nikles 1 1,30 2:1 OK NE 23.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (Q) Koepfer-Uchiyama 1 1,49 2:0 OK NE 24.08.2019 ITF SCHLIEREN (SF) Ehrat-Bonzi 1 1,50 1:2 KO NE Úspěšnost KLIENTU (Jejich tiketů) 25.08.2019 ITF HELSINKI (SF) Cerundolo-Salminen 1 1,50 2:0 OK NE 26.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (1R) Corič-Donskoy 1 1,24 3:0 OK NE 49,80 % 26.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (1R) Querrrey-Londero 1 1,20 1:3 KO NE 26.08.2019 US OPEN N.YORK (1R) Čepelová-Hsieh S.W.
  • The Ahn Changho Controversy: Rescuing a Patriot from Colonial and Postcolonial Myths

    The Ahn Changho Controversy: Rescuing a Patriot from Colonial and Postcolonial Myths

    The Ahn Changho Controversy: Rescuing a Patriot from Colonial and Postcolonial Myths Jacqueline Pak Cornell University The Journal of Northeast Asian History Volume 9 Number 2 (Winter 2012), 181-227 Copyright © 2012 by the Northeast Asian History Foundation. All Rights Reserved. No portion of the contents may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the Northeast Asian History Foundation. The Ahn Changho Controversy: Rescuing a Patriot from Colonial and Postcolonial Myths The “Ahn Changho Controversy” was sparked by new documentary evidence which challenged the earlier conventional views concerning the preeminent Korean nationalist leader, Ahn Changho (1878-1938). The Controversy arose from the historical mystery and enigma which long surrounded Ahn Changho, who was a leader of the transnational independence movement during the Japanese colonial rule, 1905-45. As one of the most spirited and enduring controversies in Korean Studies over the past decades since the 1990s, the Ahn Changho Controversy revealed theoretical divisions or ideological cleavages in the interpretations and re-interpretations of Korean colonial history: 1) gradualist pacifism vs. radical militarism; 2) a new view of “revolutionary-democracy” vs. the old view of “tripartite division” of Korean nationalist movement; 3) revisionism of “cultural nationalism” vs. neo-revisionism of revolutionary nationalism; 4) patriotism vs. collaborationism in the colonial period and the complicated legacy of the issue thereafter; and 5) the origins of Korean democracy, including the origin and drafter of the Korean republican constitution. In this regard, the Ahn Changho Controversy touched upon the highly complex and potentially explosive issues of patriotism vs. collaboration by probing into the previous revisionist binaries arising from the reductive matrix of the bipolar Cold War alignments.
  • Wisdomtree Trust Form NPORT-EX Filed 2019-08-27

    Wisdomtree Trust Form NPORT-EX Filed 2019-08-27

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM NPORT-EX Filing Date: 2019-08-27 | Period of Report: 2019-06-30 SEC Accession No. 0001752724-19-096125 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER WisdomTree Trust Mailing Address Business Address 245 PARK AVENUE 245 PARK AVENUE CIK:1350487| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 0331 35TH FLOOR 35TH FLOOR Type: NPORT-EX | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-21864 | Film No.: 191056616 NEW YORK NY 10167 NEW YORK NY 10167 212.801.2080 Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Schedule of Investments (unaudited) WisdomTree Asia Pacific ex-Japan Fund (AXJL) June 30, 2019 Investments Shares Value COMMON STOCKS - 98.9% Australia - 24.0% AGL Energy Ltd. 10,256 $144,015 AMP Ltd. 24,619 36,626 APA Group 13,629 103,293 Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. 2,488 53,636 ASX Ltd. 302 17,457 Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. 18,358 363,422 BHP Group Ltd. 40,310 1,164,315 Brambles Ltd. 12,503 113,009 CIMIC Group Ltd. 2,606 81,874 Cochlear Ltd. 260 37,739 Commonwealth Bank of Australia 11,317 657,414 Computershare Ltd. 2,667 30,338 Crown Resorts Ltd. 8,122 70,960 CSL Ltd. 1,583 238,837 Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. 56,420 357,126 Insurance Australia Group Ltd. 10,914 63,262 Macquarie Group Ltd. 1,742 153,283 National Australia Bank Ltd. 20,678 387,728 Newcrest Mining Ltd. 2,739 61,411 Qantas Airways Ltd. 14,684 55,644 QBE Insurance Group Ltd.
  • Comparative Connections

    Comparative Connections

    Pacific Forum CSIS Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations edited by Carl Baker Brad Glosserman May – August 2014 Vol. 16, No.2 September 2014 http://csis.org/program/comparative-connections Pacific Forum CSIS Based in Honolulu, Hawaii, the Pacific Forum CSIS operates as the autonomous Asia- Pacific arm of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1975, the thrust of the Forum’s work is to help develop cooperative policies in the Asia- Pacific region through debate and analyses undertaken with the region’s leaders in the academic, government, and corporate arenas. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic/business, and oceans policy issues. It collaborates with a network of more than 30 research institutes around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating its projects’ findings and recommendations to opinion leaders, governments, and publics throughout the region. An international Board of Governors guides the Pacific Forum’s work. The Forum is funded by grants from foundations, corporations, individuals, and governments, the latter providing a small percentage of the forum’s annual budget. The Forum’s studies are objective and nonpartisan and it does not engage in classified or proprietary work. Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations Edited by Carl Baker and Brad Glosserman Volume 16, Number 2 May – August 2014 Honolulu, Hawaii September 2014 Comparative Connections A Triannual Electronic Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations Bilateral relationships in East Asia have long been important to regional peace and stability, but in the post-Cold War environment, these relationships have taken on a new strategic rationale as countries pursue multiple ties, beyond those with the US, to realize complex political, economic, and security interests.
  • April 2019 Vol. 21, No. 1 May 2019

    April 2019 Vol. 21, No. 1 May 2019

    EDITED BY CARL BAKER BRAD GLOSSERMAN CREATIVE DIRECTOR NICHOLAS CIUFFETELLI JANUARY – APRIL 2019 VOL. 21, NO. 1 MAY 2019 CC.PACFORUM.ORG PACIFIC FORUM Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum is a non-profit, foreign policy research institute based in Honolulu, Hawaii. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic and business issues and works to help stimulate cooperative policies in the Asia Pacific region through analysis and dialogue undertaken with the region’s leaders in the academic, government, and corporate areas. The Forum collaborates with a network of more than 30 research institutes around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating its projects’ findings and recommendations to opinion leaders, governments, and publics throughout the region. We regularly cosponsor conferences with institutes throughout Asia to facilitate nongovernmental institution building as well as to foster cross- fertilization of ideas. A Board of Directors guides the Pacific Forum’s work. The Forum is funded by grants from foundations, corporations, individuals, and governments. The Forum’s studies are objective and nonpartisan and it does not engage in classified or proprietary work. EDITED BY CARL BAKER, PACIFIC FORUM BRAD GLOSSERMAN, TAMA UNIVERSITY CRS/PACIFIC FORUM CREATIVE DIRECTOR NICHOLAS CIUFFETELLI, PACIFIC FORUM JANUARY – APRIL 2019 VOL. 21, NO. 1 MAY 2019 HONOLULU, HAWAII COMPARATIVE CONNECTIONS A TRIANNUAL E-JOURNAL OF BILATERAL RELATIONS IN THE INDO-PACIFIC Bilateral relationships in East Asia have long been important to regional peace and stability, but in the post-Cold War environment, these relationships have taken on a new strategic rationale as countries pursue multiple ties, beyond those with the US, to realize complex political, economic, and security interests.