DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2010.10014V1 [Math.NT] 20 Oct 2020 As Suethat Assume Where Where Nqeydtrie.W Altesqec ( Sequence the Call We Determined

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2010.10014V1 [Math.NT] 20 Oct 2020 As Suethat Assume Where Where Nqeydtrie.W Altesqec ( Sequence the Call We Determined CULLEN NUMBERS IN SUMS OF TERMS OF RECURRENCE SEQUENCE N.K. MEHER AND S. S. ROUT Abstract. Let (Un)n≥0 be a fixed linear recurrence sequence of integers with order at least two, and for any positive integer ℓ, let ℓ 2ℓ + 1 be a Cullen number. Recently in · [3], generalized Cullen numbers in terms of linear recurrence sequence (Un)n≥0 under certain weak assumptions has been studied. However, there is an error in their proof. In this paper, we generalize their work, as well as our result fixes their error. In particular, for a given polynomial Q(x) Z[x] we consider the Diophantine equation ℓ ∈ Un1 + + Unk = ℓ x + Q(x), and prove effective finiteness result. Furthermore, we demonstrate··· our method· by an example. 1. Introduction Let r be a positive integer. The linear recurrence sequence (Un)n≥0 of order r is defined as U = a U + + a U (1.1) n 1 n−1 ··· r n−r where a ,...,a Z with a = 0 and U ,...,U are integers not all zero. 1 r ∈ r 6 0 r−1 The characteristic polynomial of Un is defined by t f(x) := xr a xr−1 a = (x α )mi Z[X] (1.2) − 1 −···− r − i ∈ i=1 Y arXiv:2010.10014v1 [math.NT] 20 Oct 2020 where α1,...,αt are distinct algebraic numbers and m1,...,mt are positive integers. Then Un (see e.g. Theorem C1 in part C of [14]) has a nice representation of the form t U = f (n)αn for all n 0, (1.3) n i i ≥ i=1 X where f (x) is a polynomial of degree m 1 (i = 1,...,t) and this representation is i i − uniquely determined. We call the sequence (Un)n≥0 simple if t = r. In this paper, we assume that t 2, and the characteristic polynomial f is irreducible over Q. Thus, all the roots α , (1≥ i r) of (1.2) are simple roots and hence f (n) in (1.3) are constants, i ≤ ≤ i 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 11B39, Secondary 11J86. Keywords: Cullen numbers, Linear recurrence sequence, linear forms in logarithms, Diophantine equation. 1 CULLEN NUMBERS IN SUMS OF TERMS OF RECURRENCE SEQUENCE 2 say fi (because the degree of fi(n) would be at most mi 1=1 1 = 0) and hence (1.3) becomes − − r U = f αn for all n 0. (1.4) n i i ≥ i=1 X If α > α for all j with 2 j r, then we say that α is a dominant root of the | 1| | j| ≤ ≤ 1 sequence (Un)n≥0. The Cullen numbers are elements of the sequence (Cℓ)ℓ≥0, where the ℓ-th term of the ℓ sequence is given by Cℓ := ℓ 2 +1, with ℓ Z≥0. This sequence was first introduced by Father J. Cullen [5] and it· is also mentioned∈ in Guy’s book [7, Section B20]. In 1976, C. Hooley [8] proved that almost all Cullen numbers are composite. However, there is a conjecture that there are infinitely many Cullen primes. One of the Cullen prime having more than 2 million digits is C6679881. Further, we define the generalized Cullen numbers are the numbers of the form C = ℓ sℓ +1 ℓ,s · where ℓ 1 and s 2. Clearly, Cℓ,2 = Cℓ for all ℓ 1. For simplicity we call Cℓ,s as s-Cullen≥ numbers. ≥ ≥ The occurrence of Cullen numbers in recurrence sequence has been analyzed by various authors. For instance, Luca and Shparlinski [9] studied on the pseudoprime Cullen numbers and Berrizbeitia et. al., [2] investigated on Cullen numbers which are both Riesel and Sierpinski numbers. Further, Luca and St˘anic˘a [10] proved that there are only finitely many Cullen numbers in a binary recurrence sequence under some additional assumptions. Besides this, they showed that the largest Fibonacci number in the Cullen sequence is F4. Recently, Bilu et. al., [3] studied the occurrence of generalized Cullen numbers in a fixed linear recurrence sequences. In particular, they proved that there are finitely many solutions in integers (n, m, x) of the Diophantine equation G = m xm + T (x) (1.5) n · for a given polynomial T (x) Z[x] with some assumptions on the roots of characteristic ∈ polynomial of the given linear recurrence sequence (Gn) of order at least two. However, there is an error in their proof [3, Theorem 1]. For instance, consider the linear recurrence sequence of order three defined by the recurrence relation G =3G 3G +2G , n 0 n+3 n+2 − n+1 n ≥ with initial values G0 = 0,G1 = 1 and G2 = 1. The characteristic polynomial of Gn is x3 3x2 +3x 2 and its roots are 2, (1 √3i)/2. Here these roots satisfy all the technical− conditions− in [3, Theorem 1]. Taking± T (x)= 1 in (1.5), we get − G = m xm 1. (1.6) n · − CULLEN NUMBERS IN SUMS OF TERMS OF RECURRENCE SEQUENCE 3 The integer solutions of (1.6) are precisely (n, m, x) (6k +1, 1, 2), (6k +2, 1, 2) k Z ∈{ | ∈ ≥0} which shows that the conclusion in [3, Theorem 1] is false. 1.1. Main results. In this paper, for a given polynomial Q(x) Z[x] we study the following Diophantine equation ∈ U + + U = ℓ xℓ + Q(x) (1.7) n1 ··· nk · in non negative integers n1,...,nk,ℓ with n1 > n2 > > nk 0. Our main result is the following. ··· ≥ Theorem 1. Let (Un)n≥0 be a linear recurrence sequence of order at least two such that its characteristic polynomial is irreducible over Q and has a real dominant root α > 1 and let Q(x) Z[x] be a polynomial. Then there exists an effectively computable 1 ∈ constant C depending only on (Un)n≥0, and Q(x) such that the solutions (n1, n2,...,nk,ℓ) of equation (1.7) satisfy max n , n ,...,n ,ℓ <C(log x )k. { 1 2 k } | | Remark 1.2. We note that if k = 1 in (1.7), then we do not need the assumptions α1 > 1 and α1 is real in Theorem 1. Also, we obtain the conclusion in [3, Theorem 1]. Fibonacci sequence (Fn)n 0 is a well known recurrence sequence of order two which satisfies the recurrence relation≥ F = F + F , n 2 n n−1 n−2 ≥ with initial values F0 = 1 and F1 = 1. Thus, from (1.4) we have the Binet form αn βn Fn = − (1.8) √5 where α = (1+ √5)/2 and αβ = 1. From the well known Binet form, we deduce the − bound of Fn as αn−2 F αn−1. (1.9) ≤ n ≤ Our next theorem illustrates Theorem 1 for Fibonacci sequence. Theorem 2. If (n1, n2,ℓ) is a solutions of the Diophantine equation F + F = ℓ 2ℓ + 1 (1.10) n1 n2 · in non-negative integers n , n ,ℓ with n n 0, then 1 2 1 ≥ 2 ≥ max n , n ,ℓ < 7 1018. { 1 2 } × Remark 1.3. However, we expect that if (1.10) holds with n n 0, then 1 ≥ 2 ≥ (n , n ,ℓ) (1, 0, 0), (2, 0, 0), (4, 0, 1), (3, 1, 1), (3, 2, 1), (6, 1, 2), (6, 2, 2), (14, 6, 6) . 1 2 ∈{ } CULLEN NUMBERS IN SUMS OF TERMS OF RECURRENCE SEQUENCE 4 2. Auxiliary results Let η be an algebraic number of degree d with minimal polynomial d c xd + c xd−1 + + c = c X η(i) , 0 1 ··· d 0 − i=1 Y (i) where c0 is the leading coefficient of the minimal polynomial of η over Z and the η ’s are conjugates of η in C. We define the absolute logarithmic height of an algebraic number η as 1 d h(η)= log c + log max(1, η(i) ) . d | 0| | | i=1 ! X In particular, if η = p/q is a rational number with gcd(p, q) = 1 and q > 0, then h(η) = log max p , q . {| | } To prove our theorem, we use lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms to get a bound for max n1,...,nk,ℓ appearing in (1.7). Generically, we need the following general lower bound{ for linear} forms in logarithms due to Matveev [11, Theorem 2.2]. Lemma 2.1 ([11]). Let γ1,...,γs be real algebraic numbers and let b1,...,bs be non-zero rational integer numbers. Let D be the degree of the number field Q(γ1,...,γs) over Q and let Aj be real numbers satisfying A max Dh(γ ), log γ , 0.16 , j =1, . , s. (2.1) j ≥ { j | j| } Assume that B max b ,..., b and Λ := γb1 γbs 1. If Λ =0, then ≥ {| 1| | s|} 1 ··· s − 6 Λ exp 1.4 30s+3 s4.5 D2(1 + log D)(1 + log B)A A . | | ≥ − × × × 1 ··· s Lemma 2.2. Suppose that (Un)n≥0 has a real simple dominant root α1 with 1 <α1 Z n 6∈ and f1 is the constant coefficient of α1 defined in the formula (1.3). Set −1 Λ =1 ℓf −1xℓα−n1 1+ αn2−n1 + + αni−n1 i − 1 1 1 ··· 1 for all 2 i k. If Λ = 0, then there exists an index m with 2 m t such that ≤ ≤ i ≤ ≤ nk < κi, where m log(i·(|f ( )|/|f |)) 1 1 if α 1 log α1 m κi := (m) | | ≤ (2.2) log(i·(|f1 |/|f1|)) if αm > 1. log(α1/|αm|) | | Proof. Suppose that Λi = 0. This implies ℓxℓ = f (αn1 + + αni ) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Cullen Numbers Which Are Both Riesel and Sierpiński Numbers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Number Theory 132 (2012) 2836–2841 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Number Theory www.elsevier.com/locate/jnt On Cullen numbers which are both Riesel and Sierpinski´ numbers ∗ Pedro Berrizbeitia a, J.G. Fernandes a, ,MarcosJ.Gonzáleza,FlorianLucab, V. Janitzio Mejía Huguet c a Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela b Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, C.P. 58089, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico c Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, Av. San Pablo #180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas, Azcapotzalco, 02200, México DF, Mexico article info abstract Article history: We describe an algorithm to determine whether or not a given Received 27 January 2012 system of congruences is satisfied by Cullen numbers. We use Revised 21 May 2012 this algorithm to prove that there are infinitely many Cullen Accepted 21 May 2012 numbers which are both Riesel and Sierpinski.´ (Such numbers Available online 3 August 2012 should be discarded if you are searching prime numbers with Communicated by David Goss Proth’s theorem.) Keywords: © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Cullen numbers Covering congruences Sierpinski´ numbers Riesel numbers 1. Introduction n The numbers Cn = n2 + 1 where introduced, in 1905, by the Reverend J. Cullen [1] as a particular n n case of the Proth family k2 + 1, where k = n. The analogous numbers Wn = n2 − 1 where intro- duced as far as we know, in 1917, by Cunningham and Woodall [3].
    [Show full text]
  • A Member of the Order of Minims, Was a Philosopher, Mathematician, and Scientist Who Wrote on Music, Mechanics, and Optics
    ON THE FORM OF MERSENNE NUMBERS PREDRAG TERZICH Abstract. We present a theorem concerning the form of Mersenne p numbers , Mp = 2 − 1 , where p > 3 . We also discuss a closed form expression which links prime numbers and natural logarithms . 1. Introduction. The friar Marin Mersenne (1588 − 1648), a member of the order of Minims, was a philosopher, mathematician, and scientist who wrote on music, mechanics, and optics . A Mersenne number is a number of p the form Mp = 2 − 1 where p is an integer , however many authors prefer to define a Mersenne number as a number of the above form but with p restricted to prime values . In this paper we shall use the second definition . Because the tests for Mersenne primes are relatively simple, the record largest known prime number has almost always been a Mersenne prime . 2. A theorem and closed form expression Theorem 2.1. Every Mersenne number Mp , (p > 3) is a number of the form 6 · k · p + 1 for some odd possitive integer k . Proof. In order to prove this we shall use following theorems : Theorem 2.2. The simultaneous congruences n ≡ n1 (mod m1) , n ≡ n2 (mod m2), .... ,n ≡ nk (mod mk) are only solvable when ni = nj (mod gcd(mi; mj)) , for all i and j . i 6= j . The solution is unique modulo lcm(m1; m2; ··· ; mk) . Proof. For proof see [1] Theorem 2.3. If p is a prime number, then for any integer a : ap ≡ a (mod p) . Date: January 4 , 2012. 1 2 PREDRAG TERZICH Proof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pseudoprimes to 25 • 109
    MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, VOLUME 35, NUMBER 151 JULY 1980, PAGES 1003-1026 The Pseudoprimes to 25 • 109 By Carl Pomerance, J. L. Selfridge and Samuel S. Wagstaff, Jr. Abstract. The odd composite n < 25 • 10 such that 2n_1 = 1 (mod n) have been determined and their distribution tabulated. We investigate the properties of three special types of pseudoprimes: Euler pseudoprimes, strong pseudoprimes, and Car- michael numbers. The theoretical upper bound and the heuristic lower bound due to Erdös for the counting function of the Carmichael numbers are both sharpened. Several new quick tests for primality are proposed, including some which combine pseudoprimes with Lucas sequences. 1. Introduction. According to Fermat's "Little Theorem", if p is prime and (a, p) = 1, then ap~1 = 1 (mod p). This theorem provides a "test" for primality which is very often correct: Given a large odd integer p, choose some a satisfying 1 <a <p - 1 and compute ap~1 (mod p). If ap~1 pi (mod p), then p is certainly composite. If ap~l = 1 (mod p), then p is probably prime. Odd composite numbers n for which (1) a"_1 = l (mod«) are called pseudoprimes to base a (psp(a)). (For simplicity, a can be any positive in- teger in this definition. We could let a be negative with little additional work. In the last 15 years, some authors have used pseudoprime (base a) to mean any number n > 1 satisfying (1), whether composite or prime.) It is well known that for each base a, there are infinitely many pseudoprimes to base a.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1412.5226V1 [Math.NT] 16 Dec 2014 Hoe 11
    q-PSEUDOPRIMALITY: A NATURAL GENERALIZATION OF STRONG PSEUDOPRIMALITY JOHN H. CASTILLO, GILBERTO GARC´IA-PULGAR´IN, AND JUAN MIGUEL VELASQUEZ-SOTO´ Abstract. In this work we present a natural generalization of strong pseudoprime to base b, which we have called q-pseudoprime to base b. It allows us to present another way to define a Midy’s number to base b (overpseudoprime to base b). Besides, we count the bases b such that N is a q-probable prime base b and those ones such that N is a Midy’s number to base b. Furthemore, we prove that there is not a concept analogous to Carmichael numbers to q-probable prime to base b as with the concept of strong pseudoprimes to base b. 1. Introduction Recently, Grau et al. [7] gave a generalization of Pocklignton’s Theorem (also known as Proth’s Theorem) and Miller-Rabin primality test, it takes as reference some works of Berrizbeitia, [1, 2], where it is presented an extension to the concept of strong pseudoprime, called ω-primes. As Grau et al. said it is right, but its application is not too good because it is needed m-th primitive roots of unity, see [7, 12]. In [7], it is defined when an integer N is a p-strong probable prime base a, for p a prime divisor of N −1 and gcd(a, N) = 1. In a reading of that paper, we discovered that if a number N is a p-strong probable prime to base 2 for each p prime divisor of N − 1, it is actually a Midy’s number or a overpseu- doprime number to base 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Tables of Fermat Numbers and Their Prime Factors
    Appendix A Tables of Fermat Numbers and Their Prime Factors The problem of distinguishing prime numbers from composite numbers and of resolving the latter into their prime factors is known to be one of the most important and useful in arithmetic. Carl Friedrich Gauss Disquisitiones arithmeticae, Sec. 329 Fermat Numbers Fo =3, FI =5, F2 =17, F3 =257, F4 =65537, F5 =4294967297, F6 =18446744073709551617, F7 =340282366920938463463374607431768211457, Fs =115792089237316195423570985008687907853 269984665640564039457584007913129639937, Fg =134078079299425970995740249982058461274 793658205923933777235614437217640300735 469768018742981669034276900318581864860 50853753882811946569946433649006084097, FlO =179769313486231590772930519078902473361 797697894230657273430081157732675805500 963132708477322407536021120113879871393 357658789768814416622492847430639474124 377767893424865485276302219601246094119 453082952085005768838150682342462881473 913110540827237163350510684586298239947 245938479716304835356329624224137217. The only known Fermat primes are Fo, ... , F4 • 208 17 lectures on Fermat numbers Completely Factored Composite Fermat Numbers m prime factor year discoverer 5 641 1732 Euler 5 6700417 1732 Euler 6 274177 1855 Clausen 6 67280421310721* 1855 Clausen 7 59649589127497217 1970 Morrison, Brillhart 7 5704689200685129054721 1970 Morrison, Brillhart 8 1238926361552897 1980 Brent, Pollard 8 p**62 1980 Brent, Pollard 9 2424833 1903 Western 9 P49 1990 Lenstra, Lenstra, Jr., Manasse, Pollard 9 p***99 1990 Lenstra, Lenstra, Jr., Manasse, Pollard
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Pseudoprimes
    The Distribution of Pseudoprimes Matt Green September, 2002 The RSA crypto-system relies on the availability of very large prime num- bers. Tests for finding these large primes can be categorized as deterministic and probabilistic. Deterministic tests, such as the Sieve of Erastothenes, of- fer a 100 percent assurance that the number tested and passed as prime is actually prime. Despite their refusal to err, deterministic tests are generally not used to find large primes because they are very slow (with the exception of a recently discovered polynomial time algorithm). Probabilistic tests offer a much quicker way to find large primes with only a negligibal amount of error. I have studied a simple, and comparatively to other probabilistic tests, error prone test based on Fermat’s little theorem. Fermat’s little theorem states that if b is a natural number and n a prime then bn−1 ≡ 1 (mod n). To test a number n for primality we pick any natural number less than n and greater than 1 and first see if it is relatively prime to n. If it is, then we use this number as a base b and see if Fermat’s little theorem holds for n and b. If the theorem doesn’t hold, then we know that n is not prime. If the theorem does hold then we can accept n as prime right now, leaving a large chance that we have made an error, or we can test again with a different base. Chances improve that n is prime with every base that passes but for really big numbers it is cumbersome to test all possible bases.
    [Show full text]
  • Cullen Numbers with the Lehmer Property
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000–000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 CULLEN NUMBERS WITH THE LEHMER PROPERTY JOSE´ MAR´IA GRAU RIBAS AND FLORIAN LUCA Abstract. Here, we show that there is no positive integer n such that n the nth Cullen number Cn = n2 + 1 has the property that it is com- posite but φ(Cn) | Cn − 1. 1. Introduction n A Cullen number is a number of the form Cn = n2 + 1 for some n ≥ 1. They attracted attention of researchers since it seems that it is hard to find primes of this form. Indeed, Hooley [8] showed that for most n the number Cn is composite. For more about testing Cn for primality, see [3] and [6]. For an integer a > 1, a pseudoprime to base a is a compositive positive integer m such that am ≡ a (mod m). Pseudoprime Cullen numbers have also been studied. For example, in [12] it is shown that for most n, Cn is not a base a-pseudoprime. Some computer searchers up to several millions did not turn up any pseudo-prime Cn to any base. Thus, it would seem that Cullen numbers which are pseudoprimes are very scarce. A Carmichael number is a positive integer m which is a base a pseudoprime for any a. A composite integer m is called a Lehmer number if φ(m) | m − 1, where φ(m) is the Euler function of m. Lehmer numbers are Carmichael numbers; hence, pseudoprimes in every base. No Lehmer number is known, although it is known that there are no Lehmer numbers in certain sequences, such as the Fibonacci sequence (see [9]), or the sequence of repunits in base g for any g ∈ [2, 1000] (see [4]).
    [Show full text]
  • Fibonacci S-Cullen and S-Woodall Numbers
    1 2 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 18 (2015), 3 Article 15.1.4 47 6 23 11 Fibonacci s-Cullen and s-Woodall Numbers Diego Marques Departamento de Matem´atica Universidade de Bras´ılia Bras´ılia, Brazil [email protected] Ana Paula Chaves Instituto de Matem´atica e Estat´ıstica Universidade Federal de Goi´as Goi´as, Brazil [email protected] Abstract m The m-th Cullen number Cm is a number of the form m2 + 1 and the m-th m Woodall number Wm has the form m2 1. In 2003, Luca and St˘anic˘aproved that − the largest Fibonacci number in the Cullen sequence is F4 = 3 and that F1 = F2 = 1 are the largest Fibonacci numbers in the Woodall sequence. Very recently, the second m author proved that, for any given s> 1, the equation Fn = ms 1 has only finitely many solutions, and they are effectively computable. In this note,± we shall provide the explicit form of the possible solutions. 1 Introduction m A Cullen number is a number of the form m2 +1 (denoted by Cm), where m is a nonnegative integer. This sequence was introduced in 1905 by Father J. Cullen [2] and it was mentioned in the well-known book of Guy [5, Section B20]. These numbers gained great interest in 1976, when Hooley [7] showed that almost all Cullen numbers are composite. However, despite being very scarce, it is still conjectured that there are infinitely many Cullen primes. 1 In a similar way, a Woodall number (also called Cullen number of the second kind) is m a positive integer of the form m2 1 (denoted by Wm).
    [Show full text]
  • Elementary Proof That an Infinite Number of Cullen Primes Exist
    Elementary Proof that an Infinite Number of Cullen Primes Exist Stephen Marshall 21 February 2017 Abstract This paper presents a complete proof of the Cullen Primes are infinite, even though only 16 of them have been found as of 21 Feb 2017. We use a proof found in Reference 1, that if p > 1 and d > 0 are integers, that p and p+ d are both primes if and only if for integer m: m = (p-1)!( + ) + + We use this proof for d = to prove the infinitude of Cullen prime numbers. The author would like to give many thanks to the authors of 1001 Problems in Classical Number Theory, Jean-Marie De Koninck and Armel Mercier, 2004, Exercise Number 161 (see Reference 1). The proof provided in Exercise 6 is the key to making this paper on the Cullen Prime Conjecture possible. Introduction James Cullen, (19 April 1867 – 7 December 1933) was born at Drogheda, County Louth, Ireland. At first he was educated privately, then he studied pure and applied mathematics at the Trinity College, Dublin for a while, he went to 1 Mungret College, Limerick, before deciding to become a Jesuit, studying in England in Mansera House, and St. Mary's, and was ordained as a priest on 31 July 1901. In 1905, he taught mathematics at Mount St. Mary's College in Derbyshire and published his finding of what is now known as Cullen numbers in number theory. In number theory of prime numbers, a Cullen number is a natural number of the form n Cn = n2 + 1 Cullen numbers were first studied by James Cullen in 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Problems on Smarandache Notions", by Charles Ashbacher
    Y ---~ y (p + 1,5(p + 1)) p p + 1 = Ex-b:u.s "1:T::n.i."'I7ex-lI!d.~ Pre._ •Va.:U. ~996 Collect;io:n. of Problern..s O:n. Srn..a.ra:n.dache N"o"i;io:n.s Charles Ashbacher Decisio:n.rn..a.rk 200 2:n.d A:v-e. SE Cedar Rapids, IA. 52401 U"SA Erhu.s U":n.i"V"ersity Press Vall 1996 © Cha.rles Ashbacher & Erhu.s U":n.i"V"ersity Press The graph on the first cover belongs to: M. Popescu, P. Popescu, V. Seleacu, "About the behaviour of some new functions in the number theory" (to appear this year) . "Collection of Problems on Smarandache Notions", by Charles Ashbacher Copyright 1996 by Charles Ashbacher and Erhus University Press ISBN 1-879585-50-2 Standard Address Number 297-5092 Printed in the United States of America Preface The previous volume in this series, An Introduction to the Smarandache Function, also by Erhus Cniversity Press, dealt almost exclusively with some "basic" consequences of the Smarandache function. In this one, the universe of discourse has been expanded to include a great many other things A Smarandache notion is an element of an ill-defined set, sometimes being almost an accident oflabeling. However, that takes nothing away from the interest and excitement that can be generated by exploring the consequences of such a problem It is a well-known cliche among writers that the best novels are those where the author does not know what is going to happen until that point in the story is actually reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation of Pseudoprimes Section 1:Introduction
    Generation of Pseudoprimes Danielle Stewart Swenson College of Science and Engineering University of Minnesota [email protected] Section 1:Introduction: Number theory is a branch of mathematics that looks at the many properties of integers. The properties that are looked at in this paper are specifically related to pseudoprime numbers. Positive integers can be partitioned into three distinct sets. The unity, composites, and primes. It is much easier to prove that an integer is composite compared to proving primality. Fermat’s Little Theorem p If p is prime and a is any integer, then a − a is divisible by p. This theorem is commonly used to determine if an integer is composite. If a number does not pass this test, it is shown that the number must be composite. On the other hand, if a number passes this test, it does not prove this integer is prime (Anderson & Bell, 1997) . An example 5 would be to let p = 5 and let a = 2. Then 2 − 2 = 32 − 2 = 30 which is divisible by 5. Since p = 5 5 is prime, we can choose any a as a positive integer and a − a is divisible by 5. Now let p = 4 and 4 a = 2 . Then 2 − 2 = 14 which is not divisible by 4. Using this theorem, we can quickly see if a number fails, then it must be composite, but if it does not fail the test we cannot say that it is prime. This is where pseudoprimes come into play. If we know that a number n is composite but n n divides a − a for some positive integer a, we call n a pseudoprime.
    [Show full text]
  • On Types of Elliptic Pseudoprimes
    journal of Groups, Complexity, Cryptology Volume 13, Issue 1, 2021, pp. 1:1–1:33 Submitted Jan. 07, 2019 https://gcc.episciences.org/ Published Feb. 09, 2021 ON TYPES OF ELLIPTIC PSEUDOPRIMES LILJANA BABINKOSTOVA, A. HERNANDEZ-ESPIET,´ AND H. Y. KIM Boise State University e-mail address: [email protected] Rutgers University e-mail address: [email protected] University of Wisconsin-Madison e-mail address: [email protected] Abstract. We generalize Silverman's [31] notions of elliptic pseudoprimes and elliptic Carmichael numbers to analogues of Euler-Jacobi and strong pseudoprimes. We inspect the relationships among Euler elliptic Carmichael numbers, strong elliptic Carmichael numbers, products of anomalous primes and elliptic Korselt numbers of Type I, the former two of which we introduce and the latter two of which were introduced by Mazur [21] and Silverman [31] respectively. In particular, we expand upon the work of Babinkostova et al. [3] on the density of certain elliptic Korselt numbers of Type I which are products of anomalous primes, proving a conjecture stated in [3]. 1. Introduction The problem of efficiently distinguishing the prime numbers from the composite numbers has been a fundamental problem for a long time. One of the first primality tests in modern number theory came from Fermat Little Theorem: if p is a prime number and a is an integer not divisible by p, then ap−1 ≡ 1 (mod p). The original notion of a pseudoprime (sometimes called a Fermat pseudoprime) involves counterexamples to the converse of this theorem. A pseudoprime to the base a is a composite number N such aN−1 ≡ 1 mod N.
    [Show full text]