DOCSLIB.ORG

1 the Nature and Dignity of the Human Person As The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 the Nature and Dignity of the Human Person As The THE NATURE AND DIGNITY OF THE HUMAN PERSON AS THE FOUNDATION OF THE RIGHT TO LIFE. THE CHALLENGES OF THE CONTEMPORARY CULTURAL CONTEXT PROCEEDINGS OF THE VIII ASSEMBLY OF THE PONTIFICAL ACADEMY FOR LIFE Vatican City, 25-27 February 2002 Edited by : JUAN DE DJOS VIAL CORREA ELIO SGRECCIA LIBRERIA EDITRICE VATICANA 2003 INTRODUCTION Presentation (Prof. JUAN DE DIOS VIAL CORREA E ELIO SGRECCIA) Discourse of the Holy Father JOHN PAUL II Final Communiqué CONTRIBUTION OF THE TASK-FORCE H.E. Msgr. JULIÁN HERRANZ, The dignity of the human person and the law. Rev. Prof. ANDRZEJ SZOSTEK, The anthropological issue: does absolute truth about the human being exist? Prof. WOLFGANG WALDSTEIN, The ability of human mind to know the natural law. Prof. SERGIO BELARDINELLI, "Nature" in a cosmological, biological, anthropological and ecological sense. Prof. JOHN FINNIS, Nature and natural law in the contemporary philosophical and theological debates: some observations. Rev. Prof. CHARLES MOREROD, Nature and natural law in Catholicism and Protestantism. 1 Rev. MARTIN RHONHEIMER, Natural moral law: moral knowledge and conscience.The cognitive structure of the natural law and the truth of subjectivity. Prof. FRANCESCO VIOLA, Natural law: stability and development of its contents. Prof. FRANCESCO D'AGOSTINO, Natural law, positive law and the new provocations of bioethics. Prof. JOSEPH SEIFERT, The right to life and the fourfold root of human dignity. Prof. MARIA DOLORES VILA- CORO, The rights of man and the right to life. H.E. Msgr. CARLO CAFFARRA, Natural law: marriage and procreation. 2 JUAN DE DIOS VIAL CORREA, ELIO SGRECCIA PRESENTATION It is becoming more and more urgent to address the theme of the existence of natural law and its definition in man with the necessary connection to its foundation, in human nature, and the resulting effects on natural law. First, because for a valid solution to all the problems being discussed today in the area of bioethics and bio-law, the preliminary question must be clarified as to whether or not an innate requirement exists in man as such on which the judgment can be based of the licitness or illicitness of scientific-experimental intervention on man. The discussions on abortion, euthanasia, the right to treatments, experimentation on man - starting from the embryonic stage - and, more recently, on the use of embryonic stem cells and cloning, both reproductive and therapeutic, re-propose the definition of the beginning of human life, its end, and thus the ultimate question of what defines man and his nature, and on what his law is based. Even the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and all the documents that appeal to the concept of "human rights", i.e. those inherent to man as such, are subject to this question. Does evolutionism, as an interpretative theory of the history of the universe, and historical and sociological sensitivity still allow us to speak about a human nature which, in any case, defines man as anima et corpore unus, unus because of the spiritual soul that structures and enlivens him? The anthropological question also conditions and grounds the ethical question about any intervention on man: What is man's true good, and what action done by the human individual or for the human individual is in conformity with his innate requirement? In the same way, we ask ourselves on the juridical level: What law can achieve the common good in respect for the good of each one? In order to answer this question, human nature needs to be defined, its "objectivity" and its "knowability". On the other hand, even dialogue between the different cultural currents can only be carried out on the basis of a search for a common foundation, the true good of man and the truth about man. If one speaks from the viewpoint of contractualism and utilitarianism, there is no common ground or objective values, but only the compromises based on the logic of interests, and every decision ends up being subordinated to the interests of the most powerful. For this reason the discourse on natural moral law and natural law becomes a discourse on freedom and justice. To lose or conceal this discourse is to lay the premise for all kinds of prevarication and give free rein to the logic of the war of the most powerful against the weakest, especially in the biomedical sector where the human being is the object of destruction, experimentation and business. To remove the foundations of thought on the questions of truth, the value of justice and right is to expose the entire social edifice to collapse. Moreover, sensitivity to this foundation - natural moral law-natural law - is re-emerging after the collapse of the ideologies and the deluge of weak thought and moral relativism. A great aid for this reflection has come from the Second Vatican Council (in particular in Gaudium et Spes) and the Encyclicals Veritatis Splendor (August 6, 1997) and Fides et Ratio (September 14, 1998). As to the latter, we would like to mention its condemnation of nihilism, which also brings together the outcome of other relativist visions like utilitarianism and contractualism. Even before its conflict with the requirements and contents of the Word of God, "nihilism is a denial of the humanity and of the very identity of the human being. It should never be forgotten that the neglect of being inevitably leads to losing touch with objective truth and therefore with the very ground of human dignity. This in turn makes it possible to erase from the countenance of man and woman the marks of their likeness to God, and thus to lead them little by little either to a destructive will to power or to a solitude without hope. 3 Once the truth is denied to human beings, it is pure illusion to try and set them free" (Fides et Ratio, 90). At the conclusion of the General Assembly the proceedings of which are being published here, the Holy Father cited Gaudium et Spes and the Encyclical Veritatis Splendor and reminded us about the absolute need "to refer always to man's proper and primordial nature, the nature of the human person, that is the person himself in the unity of soul and body, in the unity of his spiritual and biological inclinations and of all the other specific characteristics necessary for the pursuit of his end" (Discourse to the Participants in the Eighth General Assembly of the Pontifical Academy for Life, L'Osservatore Romano, English weekly edition, N. 11, 13 March 2002, p. 4). In that same Discourse, after criticizing the alleged conflict between natural law and freedom, the Holy Father clarified and rejected the accusation of "fixism" and of "fixist essentialism" which is often brought against natural law because of a profound misunderstanding of the notion itself of natural law: to do good and avoid evil is to put into action a perfective dynamism that involves all of man and all men; it means proposing historical tasks that are ahead of and above humanity behind the sapiential wisdom of the moral law. Perhaps an erroneous analogy with the concept of nature proper to physical realities may have generated the accusation of "fixism", a word employed as a useful tool by those who support evolutionist concepts and moral relativism. The right to life, which is at the center of the teaching of Evangelium Vitae (1995), could have neither impulse nor support if it were not anchored to the foundation of the truth about man and natural law. In the Discourse mentioned above, the Holy Father recalled that "the rights of man, in fact, should refer to what man is by nature and by force of his own dignity and not to the expression of the subjective choices of those who are able to participate in social life or of those who can obtain the consensus of the majority"; then he stated that "among the fundamental rights of man, the Catholic Church claims for every human being the right to life as the primary right. She does it in the name of the truth about man and to protect his freedom, that cannot be sustained without respect for the right to life (EV, No. 6)". In addition to the Holy Father's invaluable Discourse, the text we are presenting contains a series of contributions that are unified in an integrated treatment that includes three stages of reflection. The reflection starts from reference to the dignity of the human person and goes on to study the anthropological question in depth intended as the essential truth about man and woman and their ability to know natural law. In the second stage, the text offers the necessary, in-depth studies on the meaning of "nature" in a cosmological, biological, anthropological and ecological sense. This is followed by the chapters on: nature and natural law in the current philosophical and theological discussion; the relation between natural moral law, moral knowledge and conscience; natural law and positive law; the Protestant conception and the Catholic conception and the Protestant conception of nature and natural law. Lastly, the theme of the "right to life" is taken up in relation to the dignity of the person, human rights and the consequences that can be anticipated with regard to the family and procreation. We are convinced that we have brought together and prepared a valid and stimulating contribution to a serious reflection in the moral, the juridical and, more broadly, the cultural sphere. 4 JOHN PAUL II DISCOURSE TO THE MEMBERS Dear and illustrious members of the Pontifical Academy for Life, once again we hold a meeting that is always for me a source of hope and joy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benedict XVI's “Hermeneutic of Reform” and Religious Freedom
    Nova et Vetera, English Edition, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2011): 1029 –54 1029 Benedict XVI’s “Hermeneutic of Reform” and Religious Freedom MARTIN RHONHEIMER Pontifical University of the Holy Cross Rome, Italy I. Continuity or Rupture: How Did Vatican II Understand the Church’s Relation with the Modern World? 1 INAnotable Christmas message given before the Roman Curia on December 22, 2005, Pope Benedict XVI cautioned against a widespread interpretation of the Second Vatican Council which would posit that the Church after the Council is different than the “preconciliar” Church. Benedict called this erroneous interpretation of the Council a “hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture.” 1 The present article first appeared in German in Die Tagespost 115 (26 September 2009): 14, and online at KATH.NET, 28 September 2009 (www.kath.net/ detail.php?id=24068). A Spanish translation of the article appeared in the Appen - dix I of M. Rhonheimer, Cristianismo y laicidad: Historia y actualidad de una relación compleja, Ediciones (Madrid: Rialp, 2009), 167–79. The version presented here includes the text of that article in its entirety, expanded and provided with an appendix, which deals with specific questions concerning the continuity and infallibility of the ordinary universal magisterium, questions inherent to the prob - lem discussed here. This expanded version was first published in French as “L’«herméneutique de la réforme» et la liberté de religion,” in the French edition of Nova et Vetera 85 (2010): 341–63 (online: www.novaetvetera.ch/Art%20Rhon - heimer.htm) and in a slightly abridged version in Die Neue Ordnung 65, no. 4 (August 2011): 244–61.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta 15 Pass
    00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 1 CATHOLIC SOCIAL DOCTRINE AND HUMAN RIGHTS 00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 2 Address The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences Casina Pio IV, 00120 Vatican City Tel.: +39 0669881441 – Fax: +39 0669885218 E-mail: [email protected] 00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 3 THE PONTIFICAL ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Acta 15 CATHOLIC SOCIAL DOCTRINE AND HUMAN RIGHTS the PROCEEDINGS of the 15th Plenary Session 1-5 May 2009 • Casina Pio IV Edited by Roland Minnerath Ombretta Fumagalli Carulli Vittorio Possenti IA SCIEN M T E IA D R A V C M A S A O I C C I I A F I L T I V N M O P VATICAN CITY 2010 00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 4 The opinions expressed with absolute freedom during the presentation of the papers of this plenary session, although published by the Academy, represent only the points of view of the participants and not those of the Academy. 978-88-86726-25-2 © Copyright 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, photocopying or otherwise without the expressed written permission of the publisher. THE PONTIFICAL ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES VATICAN CITY 00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 5 His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI 00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 6 Participants in the conference hall of the Casina Pio IV 00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 7 Participants of the 15th Plenary Session 00_Prima Parte_Acta15:PrimaParte-Acta917/02/1008:35Pagina8 His Holiness Benedict XVI with the Participants of the 15th Plenary Session 00_Prima Parte_Acta 15:Prima Parte-Acta9 17/02/10 08:35 Pagina 9 CONTENTS Address of the Holy Father to the Participants.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • David S. Crawford. Recognizing the Roots of Society in The
    RECOGNIZING THE ROOTS OF SOCIETY IN THE FAMILY, FOUNDATION OF JUSTICE • David S. Crawford • “My precise criticism of liberalism is that it remakes the person and the ‘family’ in the image of its voluntarist and procedural concept of justice and the basic anthropology this entails.” Honor your father and mother, so that you might live out your days at length in the land the Lord your God has given you —Exodus 20:12 I. Introduction: Posing the Question 1. The title given here1 makes a claim: viz. that the family is or should be conceived as the “root” or “foundation” of society and justice. In doing so, it evokes the teaching of Familiaris consortio that “the family is ‘the first and vital cell of society’” (FC, 42).2 Far from being an obscure reference, this teaching of the 1981 Apostolic Exhortation is echoed by numerous other references in the Church’s 1This paper was presented at “The Christian Family for the Life of the World: Second International Study Week,” at the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and the Family at the Lateran University in Rome, 20–24 August 2007. 2Quoting Apostolicam actuositatem, 11: “prima et vitalis cellula societatis.” Communio 34 (Fall 2007). © 2007 by Communio: International Catholic Review 380 David S. Crawford magisterium to the idea that society is in some sense rooted in the family.3 The title also makes reference to the Fourth Command- ment, “Honor your father and mother, that your days may be long in the land which the Lord your God gives you” (Ex 20:12).
    [Show full text]
  • The Universal Destination of Goods and Private Property: Is the Right to Private Property Only a “Second-Tier” Natural Right?
    How to cite this paper: Martin Rhonheimer, The Universal Destina- tion of Goods and Private Property: Is the right to private property a “second-tier” natural right? Austrian Institute Paper No. 38-EN (2021) Austrian Institute Paper No. 38-EN / 2021 Martin Rhonheimer The Universal Destination of Goods and Private Property: Is the right to private property only a “second-tier” natural right? he right to private property, says the an original Golden Age. This narrative entered encyclical Fratelli tutti, is a mere “sec- Christian theology through the influence of the T ondary” natural right, “derived from Stoa. Thus, in his famous 90th letter to Lucil- the principle of the universal destination of ius, Seneca reports of a time of the “carefree created goods.” It should therefore not “dis- possession of the commonwealth,” in which place primary and overriding rights” (no. one was “concerned for one’s neighbor as one- 120). Pope Francis refers especially to John self.” In this “most happily ordered world,” Paul II and some of the Fathers of the Church, however, greed seeped in. Possessive accumu- who held that “if one person lacks what is nec- lation of property by a few was the cause of the essary to live with dignity it is because another poverty of all others; that is to say, it was a person is detaining it” (no. 119). What was the zero-sum game. This was the Stoic narrative of context of this ancient Christian conception? the economically decadent state of the con- What did the tradition mean by “secondary temporary world, and it is still the basis of all natural rights”? Finally, has the Church’s social criticism of private property today.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Perspectives on Natural Law
    1 CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES ON NATURAL LAW 2 [Dedication/series information/blank page] 3 CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES ON NATURAL LAW NATURAL LAW AS A LIMITING CONCEPT 4 [Copyright information supplied by Ashgate] 5 CONTENTS Note on the sources and key to abbreviations and translations Introduction Part One The Concept of Natural Law 1. Ana Marta González. Natural Law as a Limiting Concept. A Reading of Thomas Aquinas Part Two Historical Studies 2. Russell Hittinger. Natural Law and the Human City 3. Juan Cruz. The Formal Foundation of Natural Law in the Golden Age. Vázquez and Suárez’s case 4. Knud Haakonssen. Natural Law without Metaphysics. A Protestant Tradition 5. Jeffrey Edwards. Natural Law and Obligation in Hutcheson and Kant 6. María Jesús Soto–Bruna. Spontaneity and the Law of Nature. Leibniz and the Precritical Kant 7. Alejandro Vigo. Kant’s Conception of Natural Right 8. Montserrat Herrero. The Right of Freedom Regarding Nature in G. W. F. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right 6 Part Three Controversial Issues about Natural Law 9. Alfredo Cruz. Natural Law and Practical Philosophy. The Presence of a Theological Concept in Moral Knowledge 10. Alejandro Llano. First Principles and Practical Philosophy 11. Christopher Martin. The Relativity of Goodness: a Prolegomenon to a Rapprochement between Virtue Ethics and Natural Law Theory 12. Urbano Ferrer. Does the Naturalistic Fallacy Reach Natural Law? 13. Carmelo Vigna. Human Universality and Natural Law Part Four Natural Law and Science 14. Richard Hassing. Difficulties for Natural Law Based on Modern Conceptions of Nature 15. John Deely. Evolution, Semiosis, and Ethics: Rethinking the Context of Natural Law 16.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Ideas y Valores ISSN: 0120-0062 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Filosofía. Valenzuela-Vermehren, Luis Creating Justice in an emerging world the natural Law basis of francisco de vitoria's political and international thought Ideas y Valores, vol. LXVI, no. 163, 2017, January-April, pp. 39-64 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Filosofía. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v66n163.49770 Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80955008002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v66n163.49770 Creating Justice in an Emerging World The Natural Law Basis of Francisco de Vitoria’s Political and International Thought • La creación de la justicia en un mundo naciente El fundamento iusnaturalista del pensamiento político e internacional de Francisco de Vitoria Luis Valenzuela-Vermehren* Universidad Católica de Temuco - Temuco - Chile Artículo recibido el 19 de febrero del 2015; aprobado el 20 de abril del 2016. * [email protected] Cómo citar este artículo: mla: Valenzuela-Vermehren, L. “Creating Justice in an Emerging World. The Natural Law Basis of Francisco de Vitoria’s Political and International Thought.” Ideas y Valores 66.163 (2017): 39-64. apa: Valenzuela-Vermehren, L. (2017). Creating Justice in an Emerging World. The Natural Law Basis of Francisco de Vitoria’s Political and International Thought.Ideas y Valores, 66 (163), 39-64.
    [Show full text]
  • Rawls, Political Liberalism, and Moral Virtues
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2009 Rawls, Political Liberalism, and Moral Virtues Joseph Alava Kabari Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Kabari, Joseph Alava, "Rawls, Political Liberalism, and Moral Virtues" (2009). Dissertations. 206. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/206 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2009 Joseph Alava Kabari LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO JOHN RAWLS, POLITICAL, LIBERALISM AND MORAL VIRTUES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN PHILOSOPHY BY JOSEPH ALAVA KABARI CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2009 Copyright by Joseph Alava Kabari, 2009 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS So many people have helped, directly or indirectly, to make my journey a story of success. For the sake of brevity I can only acknowledge a few representative individuals and groups here. I begin by thanking my dissertation director, Professor David Ingram (and family). At a point when the going was getting rather rough, he graciously took expert control of the situation and guided me to the desired goal with dedication. I also very much thank the other members of my committee, Professors Thomas Wren and David Schweickart, who showed much needed understanding, patience, and encouragement during the more trying stretches of the journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism Safe Catholicism?
    a Liberalism Safe for Catholicism? Perspectives from The Review of Politics Edited by DANIEL PHILPOTT and RYAN T. ANDERSON University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana © University of Notre Dame Press University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 www.undpress.nd.edu All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2017 by University of Notre Dame Published in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Philpott, Daniel, 1967– editor. Title: A liberalism safe for Catholicism? : perspectives from the Review of politics / edited by Daniel Philpott and Ryan T. Anderson. Other titles: Review of politics. Description: Notre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press, 2017. | Series: The Review of politics series | Identifiers: LCCN 2017018504 (print) | LCCN 2017019355 (ebook) | ISBN 9780268101725 (pdf ) | ISBN 9780268101732 (epub) | ISBN 9780268101701 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780268101718 (pbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 026810171X (pbk. : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Liberalism—Religious aspects—Catholic Church. | Christianity and politics—Catholic Church. | Catholic Church—United States—History. | Liberalism—United States. Classification: LCC BX1396.2 (ebook) | LCC BX1396.2 .L525 2017 (print) | DDC 261.7088/282—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017018504 ∞ This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). © University of Notre Dame Press Introduction The Review of Politics and the Story of American Catholic Liberalism Daniel Philpott and Ryan T. Anderson A fortnight of freedom! Such was the rallying cry of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in 2012 in warning American Catholics about growing threats to the freedom of the church. In their “Statement on Religious Liberty,” the bishops pointed to a series of laws, administrative policies, and court deci- sions in recent years that, they urged, threatened the consciences of religious be- lievers in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Neutrality: Myth, Principle, and Meaning Rafael Palomino
    BYU Law Review Volume 2011 | Issue 3 Article 5 9-1-2011 Religion and Neutrality: Myth, Principle, and Meaning Rafael Palomino Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law and Politics Commons, Religion Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Rafael Palomino, Religion and Neutrality: Myth, Principle, and Meaning , 2011 BYU L. Rev. 657 (2011). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2011/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DO NOT DELETE 1/31/2013 3:49 PM Religion and Neutrality: Myth, Principle, and Meaning Rafael Palomino Knowledge of speech, but not of silence; Knowledge of words, and ignorance of the Word. - T. S. Eliot1 I. INTRODUCTION “[T]he fate of great words,” in their constant wandering, “appears to be their progressive dispersion in different directions, so that, in the end, neither detractors nor epigones know exactly what they are referring to in their diatribes or panegyrics.”2 In examining the changing dynamic of the religious phenomenon in postmodern societies, legal studies have invented or imported a considerable number of terms that offer only the illusion of scientific precision. Grand words that inspire immediate acceptance and a sense of security include the following: equality, nondiscrimination, liberty, and secularism. However, after this gratifying first impression, the jurist will take it upon himself to engage in a closer study to assess the scope, the ultimate implications, and the specific ramifications that such terms entail in reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Law and World Order in Stoicism*
    NATURAL LAW AND WORLD ORDER * IN STOICISM MARCELO D. BOERI 1. Introduction: the Stoic Natural Law and its antecedents The thesis that there is a universal law working as a sort of supreme standard for morality has long been part of a strategy to ground the claim of objectivity. If it were possible to prove that there is a universal law including in itself the wholeness of the partial or positive laws, such a universal law being an ‘objective expression’ of what is correct without qualification, the particular laws would be correct always and in any event if and only if they were instantiations of such a universal law. Some contemporary theorists, however, argue that there is a strong contrast between ‘natural law’ (which in Ancient sources is said to be ‘the law of nature’ or even a ‘divine law’) and ‘human law’ (or ‘civic law’), and that natural law considered as a moral theory (the idea enjoying the longer pedigree) has nothing to do with legal theory, which is focused on legal positivism, a view claiming that no necessary connection exists between law and morality. 1 By contrast, the ancient proponents of the natural law (specifically the Stoic philosophers) tend to remove the gap pointed out by the current theorists between natural law, on the one hand, and * This essay is the expanded version of a conference presented at the colloquium ‘Naturaleza, razón y normatividad en la filosofía antigua’ (held at the Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, in June 2011). I am grateful to the organizer of the meeting, Alejan- dro G.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrimonial Liberalism: a Weberian Approach to Early Latin American State-Making
    FORUM FOR INTER-AMERICAN RESEARCH (FIAR) VOL. 13.3 (DEC. 2020) 75-87 ISSN: 1867-1519 © forum for inter-american research Patrimonial Liberalism: A Weberian Approach to Early Latin American State-Making FRANCISCO COLOM GONZÁLEZ (SPANISH NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (CSIC)) Abstract The attempts to create liberal institutions in the absence of a recognizable liberal political culture have traditionally disconcerted historians of the Iberian world. Liberal ideas not only legitimized the termination of the colonial bond with the metropolis, but also bolstered attempts to create modern state institutions on both sides of the Iberian Atlantic. At the same time, patrimonial practices were widespread and recurrent phenomena throughout the early period of state formation. The ritual invocation and the political functionality of liberal ideas in this context demand a more nuanced explanation than simply discarding them as mere propaganda or empty political rhetoric. However unstable or contradictory 19th-century Latin American politics were, they were systematically worded in the language of liberalism and enjoyed a latent legitimacy that reflected the normative universe of the old colonial society. This article tries to explain the background of the ‘patrimonial’ type of liberalism that spread throughout Latin America after the Atlantic Revolutions and the potential that Max Weber´s theoretical framework offers for its interpretation. Keywords: Max Weber, Patrimonialism, Liberalism, Latin America, State-making Patrimonialism in Max Weber risked essentializing
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors
    Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 22, Number 2 (Fall 2019): 597–599 Copyright © 2019 Contributors James Bergida (MPhil, University of Oxford) is a DPhil student in the faculty of theology and religion at the University of Oxford. In 2017, he won a Founders’ Award from the Society for Business Ethics. He is a member of the Academy of Management, American Academy of Religion, and Society for Business Ethics. D. Glenn Butner, Jr. (PhD, Marquette University) is assistant professor of theol- ogy and Christian ministry at Sterling College. His dissertation explored behav- ioral and experimental economics from a theological perspective and is currently being revised in preparation for publication. Denise Daniels (PhD, University of Washington) is professor of management in the School of Business, Government, and Economics at Seattle Pacific University. Her research interests include faith and work, meaningful work, Sabbath, leader- ship, gender, and motivation. Sister Catherine Joseph Droste, OP (STD, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas—Angelicum) is a professor and dean of the faculty of theology at the Angelicum. Her doctoral work addressed the ecclesiology of religious life. This research is ongoing, in addition to the role of women in the Church and the life of virtue in the writings of Thomas Aquinas and Catherine of Siena. 597 Contributors Lucas G. Freire (PhD, University of Exeter) is assistant professor at Mackenzie Presbyterian University and research fellow at the Mackenzie Center for Economic Freedom. Craig S. Galbraith (PhD, Purdue University) is the Duke Energy/Betty Cameron Distinguished Professor at the Cameron School of Business, University of North Carolina Wilmington.
    [Show full text]