DOCSLIB.ORG

USAID Report Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
USAID Report Template FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FAIR, ACCOUNTABLE, INDEPENDENT, AND RESPONSIBLE (FAIR) JUDICIARY PROJECT IN UKRAINE November 30, 2016 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FAIR, ACCOUNTABLE, INDEPENDENT, AND RESPONSIBLE (FAIR) JUDICIARY PROJECT IN UKRAIINE Contract No. AID-121-C-11-00002 Cover photo: More than 3,400 judicial candidates take the second national anonymous test in Kyiv on June 5, 2012. The 1,453 candidates who passed the test were admitted to take the qualifications exam launched by the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine with support from FAIR in Kyiv on September 11, 2012 (Credit: FAIR) DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. CONTENTS Acronyms ............................................................................................................ i Executive Summary .......................................................................................... 1 Summary of Accomplishments ....................................................................... 2 Objective 1: The legislative and regulatory framework for judicial reform complies with european and international norms and supports judicial accountability and independence ............................................................................................................................ 2 Objective 2: The accountability and transparency of key judicial institutions and operations are strengthened ................................................................................................. 3 Objective 3: The professionalism and effectiveness of the ukrainian judiciary are strengthened .............................................................................................................................. 4 Objective 4: The role of civil society organizations as advocates for and monitors of judicial reform is strengthened ......................................................................................... 6 Objective 5: supporting implimentation of the law on the purification of government ................................................................................................................................ 7 OBJECTIVE 1 .................................................................................................... 9 Expected Result 1.1: Ukrainian Judicial Reform Legislation Receives Favorable Comments from the Venice Commission as Meeting International Standards and Reflects Domestic and International Expert Input............................................................ 9 Expected Result 1.2: Constitutional Reform Related to the Judiciary is Pursued in an Inclusive Manner .............................................................................................................. 22 OBJECTIVE 2 .................................................................................................. 27 Expected Result 2.1: Ukrainian Judges are Appointed on Objective, Knowledge- and Performance-Based Criteria ....................................................................................... 27 Expected Result 2.2: Ukrainian Judges are Disciplined in Transparent Processes . 33 Expected Result 2.3: The Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Judicial Accountability and Integrity is Strengthened .................................................................. 41 OBJECTIVE 3 .................................................................................................. 48 Expected Result 3.1: The Skills and Competencies of Ukrainian Judges and Court Staff are Bolstered through Modern Demand-Driven Training Programs ............... 48 Expected Result 3.2: Judicial Operations are Evaluated and Funded According to an Objective Assessment of Needs and Performance .................................................. 53 Expected Result 3.3: The SJA’s Capacity to Represent and Support the Developing Needs of Ukraine’s Judiciary is Strengthened ................................................................. 61 Expected Result 3.4: The Capacity of Courts and Judicial Institutions to Communicate Effectively with the Public is Enhanced, Leading to Greater Public Appreciation of Their Activities ......................................................................................... 65 OBJECTIVE 4 .................................................................................................. 70 Expected Result 4.1: Civil Society and the Ukrainian Public are Engaged in the Judicial Reform Process ....................................................................................................... 70 Expected Result 4.2: Civil Society Organizations Have Means and Opportunities to Effectively Monitor the Implementation of Judicial Sector Reforms and Provide Oversight to Judicial Operations ....................................................................................... 74 OBJECTIVE 5 .................................................................................................. 81 Expected Result 5.1: The Law on the Purification of Government and Relevant Legislative Framework Improved....................................................................................... 81 Expected Result 5.2: Institutions, Procedures and Registry for the Lustration and Vetting of Public Officials and Judges Strengthened ...................................................... 86 Expected Result 5.3: Improved Knowledge, Skills and Abilities of Key Stakeholders and Personnel to Conduct the Lustration and Vetting of Public Officials and Judges Professionally, Fairly and Impartially ................................................................................. 88 Expected Result 5.4: Promote Public Awareness and Civil Society Engagement in the Process of Lustration and Vetting of Public Officials and Judges to Bolster Public Trust and Confidence .............................................................................................. 91 Annex A. Financial Report ............................................................................. 98 Annex B. Performance Management & Evaluation Summary .................. 99 Annex C. Counterparts & Beneficiaries ..................................................... 204 Annex D. NGOs that Worked with FAIR .................................................. 216 Annex E. Reports & Deliverables ................................................................ 227 ACRONYMS CMS case management system CNU Chernivtsi National University COE Council of Europe COJ Council of Judges CPE Court Performance Evaluation CRC Citizen Report Card CSO civil society organization FAIR USAID Fair, Accountable, Independent, and Responsible Judiciary Program in Ukraine HAC High Administrative Court of Ukraine HCJ High Council of Justice HQC High Qualifications Commission of Judges IAHR Institute of Applied Humanitarian Research ISC Interim Special Commission on Judicial Vetting LNU Lviv National University MOE Ministry of Education MOJ Ministry of Justice NSJ National School of Judges OSCE Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe PWD persons with disabilities SJA State Judicial Administration UROL Combating Corruption and Strengthening Rule of Law in Ukraine project (USAID) FAIR FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT | i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fair, Accountable, Independent, and Responsible FAIR by the Numbers Judiciary Program in Ukraine October 2011 – September 2016 (FAIR) was a five-year project • that began implementation on Provided direct technical assistance to 613 courts, encompassing all 27 regions of October 1, 2011. FAIR was Ukraine designed to build upon initiatives • Supported 22 justice sector institutions implemented by the USAID covering all three branches of government Combating Corruption and • Engaged 46 CSOs in targeted programming Strengthening Rule of Law in • Nine proposed amendments to the Constitution and 33 amendments to laws Ukraine (UROL) project adopted enhancing judicial independence conducted from 2006 to 2011. • Trained 3,005 judges and court staff • More than 190 trainers qualified as part of FAIR supported legislative, training-of trainers programs regulatory, and institutional • Developed 16 judicial training curricula, reform of judicial institutions to including three online programs and a certification program for court staff build the foundation for a more • Almost 400 justice sector personnel accountable and independent engaged in long-term strategic planning for judiciary, and included five key the judiciary components. Component 1 • Supported two national tests, including focused on developing a 5,822 lawyers applying to become judges • Almost 950 judges selected through new constitutional, legislative, and merit-based procedures regulatory framework for judicial • Involved 383 courts in evaluating their own reform that is compliant with performance using internal and external European and international quality measures standards and supports judicial • Engaged 25,151 citizens in monitoring the accountability and independence. performance of courts, resulting in more than 2,000 recommendations to improve Component 2 centered on court operations strengthening the accountability • Increased court user satisfaction in 319 and transparency of key judicial courts institutions and operations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tanulmánykötet Збірник Наукових Робіт Selected Papers
    A KÖZ- ÉS FELSŐOKTATÁS ELŐTT ÁLLÓ KIHÍVÁSOK A XXI. SZÁZADBAN KELET-KÖZÉP-EURÓPÁBAN AZ OKTATÁSI REFORMOK TÜKRÉBEN Nemzetközi tudományos konferencia Beregszász, 2019. március 28–29. Tanulmánykötet ВИКЛИКИ XXI СТОЛІТТЯ У СФЕРІ СЕРЕДНЬОЇ ТА ВИЩОЇ ОСВІТИ СХІДНОЇ ТА ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОЇ ЄВРОПИ В ПРОЦЕСІ РЕФОРМУВАННЯ ОСВІТИ Міжнародна науково-практична конференція Берегове, 28–29 березня 2019 року Збірник наукових робіт CHALLENGES OF THE 21ST CENTURY IN THE FIELD OF SECONDARY AND HIGHER EDUCATION OF EASTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPE IN LIGHT OF EDUCATIONAL REFORMS International Academic Conference Berehove, March 28–29, 2019 Selected papers A KÖZ- ÉS FELSŐOKTATÁS ELŐTT ÁLLÓ KIHÍVÁSOK A XXI. SZÁZADBAN KELET-KÖZÉP-EURÓPÁBAN AZ OKTATÁSI REFORMOK TÜKRÉBEN Nemzetközi tudományos konferencia Beregszász, 2019. március 28–29. Tanulmánykötet Szerkesztette: Berghauer-Olasz Emőke, Gávriljuk Ilona, Hutterer Éva és Pallay Katalin „RIK-U” Kft. Ungvár 2019 УДК (ETO): 061.3(477.87) K– 93 A kiadvány a 2019. március 28–29-én Beregszászban a II. Rákóczi Ferenc Kár­ pátaljai Magyar Főiskola Pedagógia és Pszichológia Tanszéke által rendezett A köz- és felsőoktatás előtt álló kihívások a XXI. században Kelet-Közép-Európá- ban az oktatási reformok tükrében című nemzetközi tudományos konferencián elhangzott előadások anyagát tartalmazza. Készült a II. Rákóczi Ferenc Kárpátaljai Magyar Főiskola Kiadói Részlege és Pedagógia és Pszichológia Tanszéke közreműködésével. Szerkesztette: Berghauer-Olasz Emőke, Gávriljuk Ilona, Hutterer Éva és Pallay Katalin Korrektúra: Grica-Varcaba Ildikó, Lőrincz Marianna, Kordonec Olekszandr Tördelés: Tótin Viktória, Dobos Sándor Borítóterv: Dobos Sándor A borítón a Pedagógia és Pszichológia Tanszék tanító és óvodapedagógia szakos hallgatói láthatók. A felvételeket Csopák Éva és Espán Margaréta a tanszék ren­ dezvényein készítette. ETO-besorolás: a II.
    [Show full text]
  • Launching an Effective Anti- Corruption Court: Lessons from Ukraine
    U4 Practice Insight 2021:1 Launching an effective anti- corruption court: Lessons from Ukraine By David Vaughn and Olha Nikolaieva Series editor: Sofie Arjon Schütte Disclaimer All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies. Partner agencies German Corporation for International Cooperation – GIZ German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development – BMZ Global Affairs Canada Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark / Danish International Development Assistance – Danida Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency – Sida Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation – SDC The Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation – Norad UK Aid – Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office About U4 U4 is a team of anti-corruption advisers working to share research and evidence to help international development actors get sustainable results. The work involves dialogue, publications, online training, workshops, helpdesk, and innovation. U4 is a permanent centre at the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) in Norway. CMI is a non-profit, multi-disciplinary research institute with social scientists specialising in development studies. www.U4.no [email protected] Cover photo High Anti-Corruption Court (CC copyrighted) Keywords justice sector - anti-corruption courts - judges - vetting - Ukraine - Eastern Europe Publication type U4 Practice Insight Creative commons This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Ukraine’s High Anti-Corruption Court was created in response to immense public demand to hold government officials and judges accountable for corruption. Making the court operational, however, required more than adopting legislation. It meant selecting and preparing judges, recruiting qualified court personnel, and setting up administrative and organisational structures, including courthouse facilities, security, IT infrastructure, and communications systems.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Observanсe and Protection of the Rights of the Child in Ukraine
    The Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights STATE OF OBSERVANСE AND PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD IN UKRAINE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE UKRAINIAN PARLIAMENT COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of ratification by Ukraine of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Kyiv–2010 01_Titul_14 .indd 1 21 .01 .2011 12:58:58 УДК 342.7 (477) (042.3) ББК 67.9 (4УКР) 400.7 С 76 Nina Karpachova С 76 State of Observance and Protection of the Rights of the Child in Ukraine. Special Report of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights. On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of ratification by Ukraine of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. – Kyiv, 2010. – 216 pp. ISBN 966-7855-00-7 © Nina Karpachova, 2010 ISBN 966-7855-00-7 © UNICEF, 2010 01_Titul_14 .indd 2 21 .01 .2011 12:58:58 CONTENTS Introduction ............................................ 3 І. Implementation of the International and European standards of the rights of the Child in the National Legislation of Ukraine ........ 6 ІІ. Children’s Rights Monitoring and Protection Mechanism: the Duty of the State . 16 2.1. System of government agencies for the protection of the rights of the child in Ukraine................................... 16 2.2. The Commissioner for Human Rights as a constitutional body for monitoring implementation of the rights of the child . 28 ІІІ. Protection of civil and personal rights of the child . 39 3.1. The right of the child to life................................ 39 3.2. The role of family, society and state in preventing neglect, homelessness and abuse of the child .
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Risks in Recent Reforms to the Ukrainian
    CORRUPTION RISKS IN RECENT REFORMS TO THE UKRAINIAN JUDICIARY Contract No. AID-OAA-I-13-00032, Task Order No. AID-121-TO-16-00003 Nove Pravosuddya Justice Sector Reform Program (New Justice) Contracting Officer’s Representative: Oleksandr Piskun, Democracy Project Management Specialist, Office of Democracy and Governance Development Objective 1: More Participatory, Transparent and Accountable Government Processes Author: Dr. Victoria Jennett, Judicial Reform Expert Submitted by: Chemonics International Inc. September, 2017 1 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States Government. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Recommendations.............................................................................................................................. 5 Judicial corruption ............................................................................................................................10 What is judicial corruption? ..........................................................................................................10 How judicial corruption manifests itself in Ukraine .......................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Government in Ukraine and the Development of Cooperation Between Ukraine and the EU
    Local and regional government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between Ukraine and the EU The report was written by the Aston Centre for Europe - Aston University. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available on the internet at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-31-12-226-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0627-4 DOI: 10.2863/59575 © European Union, 2011 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned Table of Contents 1 PART ONE .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of local and regional government in Ukraine ................................ 3 1.3 Ukraine’s constitutional/legal frameworks for local and regional government 7 1.4 Competences of local and regional authorities............................................... 9 1.5 Electoral democracy at the local and regional level .....................................11 1.6 The extent and nature of fiscal decentralisation in Ukraine .........................15 1.7 The extent and nature of territorial reform ...................................................19 1.8 The politics of Ukrainian administrative reform plans.................................21 1.8.1 Position of ruling government ..................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Budgeting in Eastern Ukraine 2019
    PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING Practical experiences from cities and amalgamated communities in Eastern Ukraine Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Initiative for the Infrastructure Program for Ukraine Project “Strengthening Ukrainian Communities Hosting Internally Displaced Persons” PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING IN THE EAST OF Content UKRAINE – INTEGRATION FOR DEVELOPMENT The project supports the implementation of 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................7 Participatory Budgeting (PB) in 5 cities and 5 amalgamated territorial communities in Zaporizhzhia, Dnipro, and Kharkiv 2 General Description of Approach..............................................................11 oblasts. 3 Results..........................................................................................................................17 5 cities: 5 ATCs: 3.1 General results of initiative............................................................19 Kryvyi Rih Prymorska ATC 3.2 Specific results per partner.....................................................26 Kamianske Chernihivska ATC 3.2.1 Kryvyi Rih ...........................................................................................28 Melitopol Tomakivska ATC 3.2.2 Kamianske.........................................................................................30 Chuguiv Shyrokivska ATC 3.2.3 Melitopol............................................................................................32 Pervomaiskyi
    [Show full text]
  • Military Justice in Ukraine: a Guidance Note Mindia Vashakmadze
    Military Justice in Ukraine: A Guidance Note Mindia Vashakmadze Security Sector Reform Working Group: Military Justice 1 Mindia Vashakmadze Military Justice in Ukraine: A Guidance Note Geneva — 2018 DCAF: The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in-country support and practical assistance programmes. PfPC SSR WG: The Partnership for Peace Consortium (PfPC) Security Sector Reform Working Group (SSR WG) was formally established in 2001. The objectives of the SSR Working Group are to enhance the process of security sector reform and good governance through cooperation in joint research, outreach and expert training initiatives. The SSR WG aims to encourage cooperation between international information networks as well as to enhance the exchange of ideas, insights, expertise, knowledge and best practices of security sector reform processes between consolidating and consolidated democracies in the Euro-Atlantic area. This group is supported by the Swiss Federal Department of Defense, Civil Protection and Sport, and managed by the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF). Published by DCAF 2E, Chemin Eugene-Rigot P.O Box 1360 CH – 1211 Geneva 1 www.dcaf.ch Author: Mindia Vashakmadze Printed by: Center for Army, Conversion and Disarmament Studies (CACDS) While the internet references cited herein were valid as of the date of publication, neither DCAF nor the author can attest to their current validity.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgently for Publication (Procurement Procedures) Annoucements Of
    Bulletin No�4 (183) January 28, 2014 Urgently for publication Annoucements of conducting (procurement procedures) procurement procedures 001143 000833 Luhansk National Agrarian University SOE “Prydniprovska Railway” 91008 Luhansk, Luhansk National Agrarian University 108 Karla Marksa Ave., 49600 Dnipropetrovsk Yevsiukova Liudmyla Semenivna, Bublyk Maryna Borysivna Ivanchak Serhii Volodymyrovych tel.: (095) 532–41–16; tel.: (056) 793–05–28; tel./fax: (0642) 96–77–64; tel./fax: (056) 793–00–41 e–mail: [email protected] Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: www.tender.me.gov.ua www.tender.me.gov.ua Website which contains additional information on procurement: www. tender. uz.gov.ua Website which contains additional information on procurement: www.lnau.lg.ua Procurement subject: code 33.17.1 – repair and maintenance of other Procurement subject: code 06.20.1 – natural gas, liquefied or in a gaseous vehicles and equipment (services in modernization of machine ВПР–02 state (gas exclusively for production of heat energy which is consumed with conducting major repair) – 1 unit by budget institutions and organizations), 1327,0 thousand m3 Supply/execution: on the territory of the winner of the bids; during 10 months from Supply/execution: at the customer’s address; till 31.12.2014 the moment of signing the act of delivery of track machine to modernization with Procurement procedure: procurement from the sole participant repair, but
    [Show full text]
  • CIUS Endowment Fund: $808,695 the fi Elds of History, Political Science, Law, and Economics
    CIUS Newsletter Spring 2005 Spring Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies 450 Athabasca Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E8 CIUS and the Orange Revolution: Informing the Public and Media on Events in Ukraine Fall 2004 was a period in which CIUS staff became increasingly fo- cused on the presidential elections in Ukraine. Th is involved, for the most part, informing colleagues, the me- dia, and the general public about the Ukrainian presidential elections and what has become known as the Orange Revolution. CIUS also managed the Ukraine Transparency and Election Monitoring Project (UTEMP) in this period. UTEMP was offi cially launched on 10 September 2004, when Toronto MP Borys Wrzesnewskyj presented CIUS with a $250,000 cheque on behalf of his family’s charitable foundation “Dopo- moha Ukraini—Aid to Ukraine.” James Jacuta headed the project for CIUS, while the NGO Community Energy Foundation was CIUS’s partner in Voting on 26 December in Zaporizhia, Ukraine. Photo by Ruby Swanson, Department of Ukraine. Physics, University of Alberta. Ms. Swanson was an observer at the 26 Dec 2004 vote. UTEMP sent 26 Canadians to Ukraine under the auspices of the monton–Mill Woods–Beaumont), Judy Mr. Jacuta, and UTEMP observers. project. Some were involved in design- Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North), MPs Borys Wrzesnewskyj and Peter ing and delivering seminars on election Borys Wrzesnewskyj (Etobicoke Goldring were featured several times laws, policies, and procedures for local Centre), and Senator David Smith. Th e in national TV broadcasts by both the election offi cials and scrutineers. Oth- Canadian government’s decision not to CBC and CTV networks from Kyiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernization of Pedagogical Higher Education by Innovative Teaching Instruments
    MODERNIZATION OF PEDAGOGICAL HIGHER EDUCATION BY INNOVATIVE TEACHING INSTRUMENTS Seminar on the implementation of tasks of the 1st package. June 11-12, 2018 About Kyiv There are many ancient and modern sights in Kyiv. Historical centers and districts of Kyiv tell us about the city’s distant past. Buildings in Kyiv - living witnesses of the flow of time and events of the present. Numerous monasteries and temples of the City decorate it and create an atmosphere of purity and holiness. There are many monuments that have become a kind of architectural landmarks of the capital. Due to the large number of parks and green areas, the image of Kyiv is so unique. Streets and squares of Kyiv remember the joy and sad moments in the history of our city. The diversity of Kyiv monuments does not stop to amaze and admire. All of this – identity of the Kyiv, which makes it so unique and loved among Ukrainians and tourists. More than 70 parks and 200 gardens are located on the territory of Kyiv, making our capital one of the greenest cities in Europe and even around the world. Kyiv is a city with an extraordinary atmosphere. This is the city where we fall in love and in which we fall in love. If you were born and live here - you are probably the patriot of the capital of Ukraine. And if you come here as a tourist – if You visiting Kyiv once, you’ll want to come back here again and again! How to get to the city / from the airport / train station From the Airport By Sky Bus You can get Sky Bus from the International airport "Boryspil" to Kyiv (via Kharkivska metro station to the Central Railway Station, South Terminal).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2021
    Part 3 of THE YEAR IN REVIEW pages 7-13 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXXIX No. 5 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 31, 2021 $2.00 Ukraine celebrates Unity Day Ukraine’s SBU suspects former agency colonel of plotting to murder one of its generals by Mark Raczkiewycz KYIV – On January 27, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said it had secured an arrest warrant for Dmytro Neskoromnyi, a former first deputy head of the agency, on suspicion of conspiring to murder a serving SBU general. Mr. Neskoromnyi, a former SBU colonel, allegedly plotted the assassination with currently serving Col. Yuriy Rasiuk of the SBU’s Alpha anti-terrorist unit. The alleged target was 38-year-old Brig. Gen. Andriy Naumov. Mr. Naumov heads the agency’s internal security department, which is responsible for preventing corruption among the SBU’s ranks. RFE/RL In a news release, the SBU provided video RFE/RL A human chain on January 22 links people along the Paton Bridge in Kyiv over the and audio recordings, as well as pictures, as Security Service of Ukraine Brig. Gen. Dnipro River that bisects the Ukrainian capital, symbolizing both sides uniting when evidence of the alleged plot. The former col- Andriy Naumov the Ukrainian National Republic was formed in 1919. onel was allegedly in the process of paying “If there is a crime, we must act on it. $50,000 for carrying out the murder plot. by Roman Tymotsko (UPR), Mykhailo Hrushevskyy. And, in this case, the SBU worked to pre- Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Quality Assurance System in Chernivtsi National University
    INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN CHERNIVTSI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY October 2016 REVELANCE Socio-economic changes in society The adoption of a new legal framework in higher education Increasing demands and needs of the main stakeholders in higher education defined QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION as a priority for Ukrainian society LAW OF UKRAINE “ON HIGHER EDUCATION” Section V. QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 16. Higher education quality assurance system Higher education quality assurance system in Ukraine consists of: Quality assurance system of the National Agency of higher education quality assurance and independent quality assurance and assessment organizations External quality assurance systems of higher educational units and higher education Internal quality assurance systems of higher educational units and higher education FACTORS OF HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY Factors that determine the content of training, organization of educational process in higher educational units: requirements of the labor market, state and society to modern specialist; advances in science and technology that should be taken into account while forming the content of vocational training; the level of general education of students; logistical and financial support of the educational process; interaction with employers. Factors that are directly detected in educational process of higher educational units: level of educational, professional and academic training programs; introduction of modern innovative and information technologies; professional and practical
    [Show full text]