Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Saugus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Saugus Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management Saugus River Water Budget and Instream Flow Study Prepared By: Gomez and Sullivan Engineers and Environmental Scientists 55 North Stark Highway Weare, NH 03281 APPENDICES Summary of Appendices Appendix A: LWSC: Public Water Supply Annual Statistics Reports from 1994-1999 Appendix B: Calculation of LWSC Saugus River Diversions, Ipswich River Diversions, Runoff around Four Reservoirs and Imported MWRA Water. Data was used to develop Figure 3.2-1. Appendix C: LWSC Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan Appendix D: Sheraton Golf Course: Public Water Supply Annual Statistics Reports from 1994-1999. Absent 1996 Appendix E: LCWD: Public Water Supply Annual Statistics Reports from 1994-1999 Appendix F: WWD: Public Water Supply Annual Statistics Reports from 1994-1999 Appendix G: SWRC: 2001 Water Quality Report Appendix H: Habitat Matrix and Mapping of the Saugus River from the Diversion Dam to the Saugus Ironworks Appendix I: Habitat Suitability Index Curves Appendix J: Flow Notes obtained during IFIM study and other tables Appendix K: Photo Documentation of Study Reaches Appendix L: Diversion Dam and Staples Reaches- Cross-sections and Rating Curves Appendix M: Weighted Usable Area versus Flow Results Appendix A: LWSC: Public Water Supply Annual Statistics Reports from 1994-1999 Appendix B: Calculation of LWSC Saugus River Diversions, Ipswich River Diversions, Runoff around Four Reservoirs and Imported MWRA Water. Data was used to develop Figure 3.2-1. APPENDIX B- DATA USED TO DEVELOP GRAPHS IN SECTION 3 Page 1 of 2 Hawkes Pond Pumping Records Average Monthly Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 *Average Average Flow at USGS gage Month MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD cfs-days cfs-days January 342 90 342 0 415.9 399 264.8 170.8 45.5 February 252 144 270 134 425.9 170 232.7 5.4 46.8 March 108 360 162 239 139.2 68 179.4 3.7 46.8 April 72 216 360 209 223.9 102 197.2 4.1 48.0 May 522 126 252 157 66 124 207.8 4.3 30.2 June 72 108 126 157 101.6 50 102.4 2.1 24.3 July 0 0 108 18 110.2 0 39.4 0.8 7.7 August 54 0 36 0 91.9 50 38.7 0.8 3.8 September 180 18 144 0 32.5 152 87.8 1.8 12.1 October 180 162 198 18 148.9 251 159.7 3.3 29.8 November 234 486 198 166 216.7 314 269.1 5.6 24.3 December 522 270 0 229 102 268 231.8 4.8 34.1 Total 2538 1980 2196 1327 2074.7 1948 167.6 8.4 29.5 Total Demand Average Monthly Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 *Average Average Flow at USGS gage Month MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD cfs-days cfs-days January no estimate 337 326 362 336.513 339.026 323 337.3 16.9 45.5 February no estimate 305 329 364 293.672 299.556 284 312.5 17.3 46.8 March no estimate 339 355 376 332.704 332.656 310 340.9 17.0 46.8 April no estimate 314 305 301 312.295 318.561 314 310.8 16.1 48.0 May no estimate 342 320 328 329.97 348.156 335 333.9 16.7 30.2 June no estimate 372 340 353 373.829 345.412 382 361.0 18.7 24.3 July no estimate 400 365 359 394.114 382.01 362 377.0 18.9 7.7 August no estimate 360 369 362 363.832 351.845 342 358.1 17.9 3.8 September no estimate 326 367 311 330.425 347.947 308 331.7 17.1 12.1 October no estimate 329 315 329 315.165 327.083 298 318.9 15.9 29.8 November no estimate 302 300 308 303.552 306.334 276 299.3 15.5 24.3 December no estimate 311 323 322 333.865 307.166 289 314.3 15.7 34.1 Total 4037 4014 4075 4019.936 4005.752 3823 333.0 16.6 29.5 Water Withdrawn from Saugus River as Report on Annual Reports Average Monthly Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 *Average Average Flow at USGS gage Month MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD cfs-days cfs-days Jan no estimate 342 77 366 0 406.6 251 240.4 12.0 45.5 Feb no estimate 252 122 25 190 462.7 92 190.6 10.6 46.8 Mar no estimate 108 306 0 312 37.2 0 127.2 6.4 46.8 Apr no estimate 72 184 474 0 194.2 59 163.9 8.5 48.0 May no estimate 522 107 52 224 0 151 176.0 8.8 30.2 Jun no estimate 72 92 150 111 20 41 81.0 4.2 24.3 Jul no estimate 0 0 113 0 27 0 23.3 1.2 7.7 Aug no estimate 54 0 75 0 103 0 38.7 1.9 3.8 Sep no estimate 180 15 244 0 0 228 111.2 5.7 12.1 Oct no estimate 180 138 84 5 330.3 305 173.7 8.7 29.8 Nov no estimate 234 413 0 328 226 344 257.5 13.3 24.3 Dec no estimate 522 230 7 362 154 387 277.0 13.9 34.1 Total 2538 1684 1590 1532 1961 1858 155.0 7.8 29.5 APPENDIX B- DATA USED TO DEVELOP GRAPHS IN SECTION 3 Page 2 of 2 Water Withdrawn from Ipswich as Report on Annual Reports Average Monthly Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 *Average Average Flow at USGS gage Month MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD cfs-days cfs-days January no estimate 0 0 208 0 446.5 80 122.4 6.1 45.5 February no estimate 0 0 0 0 86.4 114 33.4 1.8 46.8 March no estimate 0 0 0 91 0 18 18.2 0.9 46.8 April no estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 48.0 May no estimate 0 0 0 157 0 0 26.2 1.3 30.2 June no estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 24.3 July no estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 7.7 August no estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 3.8 September no estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 12.1 October no estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 29.8 November no estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 24.3 December no estimate 39 221 0 95 0 231 97.7 4.9 34.1 Total 39 221 208 343 532.9 443 24.8 1.2 29.5 Purchased Water Average Monthly Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 *Average Average Flow at USGS gage Month MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD cfs-days cfs-days January no estimate 23 20 18 17.306 11.345 10 16.6 0.8 45.5 February no estimate 19 19 18 15.785 7.809 7 14.4 0.8 46.8 March no estimate 22 22 12 18.92 10.922 7 15.5 0.8 46.8 April no estimate 21 19 11 17.223 11.193 8 14.6 0.8 48.0 May no estimate 21 14 12 16.474 10.328 7 13.5 0.7 30.2 June no estimate 23 18 16 15.485 11.456 9 15.5 0.8 24.3 July no estimate 28 21 18 16.48 12.71 12 18.0 0.9 7.7 August no estimate 23 22 17 12.591 12.534 13 16.7 0.8 3.8 September no estimate 22 20 13 12.82 12.727 13 15.6 0.8 12.1 October no estimate 24 16 18 13.563 11.153 11 15.6 0.8 29.8 November no estimate 20 14 10 12.068 8.988 8 12.2 0.6 24.3 December no estimate 21 14 8 13.709 8.838 6 11.9 0.6 34.1 Total 267 219 171 182.424 130.003 111 15.0 0.8 29.5 Runoff around 4 reservoirs Average Monthly Year 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 *Average Average Flow at USGS gage Month MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD MGD cfs-days cfs-days January no estimate -28 229 -230 319.207 -525.419 -18 -42.2 -2.1 45.5 February no estimate 34 188 321 87.887 -257.353 71 74.1 4.1 46.8 March no estimate 209 27 364 -89.216 284.534 285 180.1 9.0 46.8 April no estimate 221 102 -184 295.072 113.168 247 132.4 6.8 48.0 May no estimate -201 199 264 -67.504 337.828 177 118.2 5.9 30.2 June no estimate 277 230 187 247.344 313.956 332 264.6 13.7 24.3 July no estimate 372 344 228 377.634 342.3 350 335.7 16.8 7.7 August no estimate 283 347 270 351.241 236.311 329 302.8 15.1 3.8 September no estimate 124 332 54 317.605 335.22 67 205.0 10.6 12.1 October no estimate 125 161 227 296.602 -14.37 -18 129.5 6.5 29.8 November no estimate 48 -127 298 -36.516 71.346 -76 29.6 1.5 24.3 December no estimate -271 -142 307 -136.844 144.328 -335 -72.3 -3.6 34.1 Total 1193 1890 2106 1962.512 1381.849 1411 138.1 7.0 29.5 Appendix C: LWSC Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan Water Conservation Policy and Drought Contingency Plan Hazard - Drought A drought could cause conditions that prevent the Commission from supplying water to the residents of Lynn.
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Resources Inventory
    Town of Saugus Historical Commission Town Hall 298 Central Street Saugus, MA 01906 CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Updated: May 2012 The Town of Saugus contains hundreds of sites and structures having architectural, archeological, or historical significance. At the present time, five properties are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, two of which have been designated as National Historic Landmarks (NHL) by the Secretary of the Interior. National Register Properties: Boardman House (NHL, 10/15/1966) Breakheart Reservation Parkways (8/11/2003) Lynn Fells Parkway (5/9/2003) Saugus Iron Works (NHL, 10/15/1966) Saugus Town Hall (6/20/1985) The Commission completed an Inventory of Cultural and Historical Resources in 1986. This inventory was largely confined to resources that were at least 50 years old, and did not include many additional resources reflecting the growth of the Town since World War II. The results of this inventory have been entered into the Massachusetts Historical Commission’s MACRIS database. With a few exceptions, the inventory forms, along with inventory records created by other federal and state agencies, are available for downloading from the MACRIS site (http://mhc-macris.net/). The following listing is in two parts. The first lists properties included in the MACRIS database, while the second shows those properties which the Commission has identified for potential inclusion in the inventory. This includes both older properties not included in the previous inventory and those which have achieved the 50 year age criteria since the initial survey was done. It should be noted that the list of potential additions will expand as individual properties within areas are inventoried or miscellaneous residential properties are identified as being significant either as architecture or association.
    [Show full text]
  • 40B Or Not to 40B in Saugus Nahant Rallies
    WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 2019 Nahant Senator sees licensing rallies the undocumented as safe By Thor Jourgensen (RMV) cannot issue a driver’s license to for ITEM STAFF anyone that cannot prove U.S. citizen- ship or lawful presence in the United LYNN — It’s time to shatter nega- States,” Registry spokeswoman Judith wetlands tive myths dogging proposals to allow Reardon Riley said in a statement. undocumented immigrants to obtain Crighton said the Work and Family By Bridget Turcotte driver’s licenses, said state Sen. Bren- Mobility Act would allow an undocu- ITEM STAFF dan Crighton. mented immigrant to bring a passport The Lynn Democrat and state Repre- from their country of origin or obtain NAHANT — Several Nah- sentatives Tricia Farley-Bouvier (Pitts- PHOTO | SHNS documentation from their country’s ant residents boarded a bus eld) and Christine Barber (Somer- consulate and present the documents to the Massachusetts State From left, state Sen. Brendan Crighton, Rep. ville-Medford) support allowing state along with a standard license applica- House Tuesday morning to Tricia Farley-Bouvier and Rep. Christine residents to apply for a standard driv- tion at the RMV. support a bill that would Barber are sponsoring legislation that would er’s license regardless of immigration “They would go through the same change a law that enables allow undocumented immigrants to acquire status. religious and education non- standard Massachusetts driver’s licenses. “The Registry of Motor Vehicles CRIGHTON, A3 pro ts to bypass local envi- ronmental regulations. An act to prevent nonprof- it institutions from avoiding wetlands or natural resource Mother 40B or protections under the so- called Dover Amendment, proposed by State Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Quannapowitt Diagnostic Feasibility Study
    PALIS #93060 LAKE QUANNAPOWITT COM fo) O i I I I I I I I I I LAKE QUANNAPOWITT • DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY • Wakefield, Massachusetts FINAL REPORT • July, 1986 i i i i i i i I COM CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. One Center Plaza environmental engineers, scientists, _ „ .. mmo a , , ', Boston, Massachusetts 02108 I planners, & management consultants ' I y 617 742-5151 I July 24, 1986 I Mr. Richard C. Boutiette, P.E. Director of Public Works Town of Wakefield I 1 Lafayette Street Wakefield, MA 01880 I Dear Mr. Boutiette: Please find 12 copies of the addendum to the Final Diagnostic/Feasibility Study for Lake Quannapowitt. One copy has been sent to the Wakefield I Library. This revision to the Final Report completes the work on our contract with the Town of Wakefield for Phase I of the project, and 10 I copies have been sent to the Clean Lakes Section of DEQE. It has been a pleasure working on the project with the Department of Public Works, and we look forward to continuing our good working I relationship with the Town of Wakefield. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call. I Sincerely, I CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC I Eileen Pannetier Project Manager I cc: Chris Duerring, DEQE I I I I I I I ADDENDUM TO FINAL REPORT I DIAGNOSTIC/FEASIBILITY STUDY Lake Quannapowitt, Wakefield, Massachusetts I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, TOWN OF WAKEFIELD I INTRODUCTION The purpose of this addendum is to address the final comments from the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE) on the Lake I Quannapowitt Phase I Diagnostic/Feasibility Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Management Planning Program
    Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Middlesex Fells Planning Unit Middlesex Fells Planning Unit RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2011 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Richard K. Sullivan Jr., Secretary Edward M. Lambert Jr., Commissioner Dear Friends, Supporters, Users and Stakeholders of the DCR Middlesex Fells Reservation; I am please to introduce you to this draft Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Middlesex Fells Reservation. RMPs provide guidelines for management of properties under the stewardship of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). They are intended to be working documents for setting priorities, enabling the DCR to adapt to changing fiscal, social and environmental conditions. The planning process provides a forum for communication and cooperation with park visitors and the surrounding communities to ensure transparency in the DCR’s stewardship efforts. For more than a century, the Middlesex Fells Reservation has provided visitors a natural oasis in the midst of an urbanized landscape, and an opportunity for visitors to connect with nature. The reservation offers a variety of nature-based recreation activities that are special to the residents of metropolitan Boston and beyond. It is home to ten rare plants and animals, uncommon natural communities, and cultural and historic resources that live as a testament to our agrarian and industrial past. Generations of users have traversed its trails, viewed the Boston skyline from atop its rocky hills, and enjoyed the sound of birdsong echoing through the forest. This RMP strives to balance recreational use and demand with the protection natural and cultural resources at the DCR Middlesex Fells so that these experiences, and others, are available for the generations to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Pond and Lake GEIR Appendices
    APPENDIX I WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS AND FUNDING SOURCES NOTE TO READER: Because of ongoing changes in programs and funding sources, the information in this Appendix has been omitted. The most up-to-date information on funding sources can be found at the web site of the Massachusetts Nonpoint Source Management Plan: http://www.state.ma.us/dep/brp/wm/nonpoint.htm and by contacting other agencies and entities or consulting their web sites. Appendix II 2 APPENDIX II TABLE OF CONTENTS LOCAL PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: II.1 SSC- STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CODE and TITLE 5 (BOH) II.2 Zoning-ZONING REGULATIONS (ZC) II.3 WPA-WETLANDS PROTECTION ACT (ConComm) II.4 RPA-RIVERS PROTECTION ACT (ConComm) STATE PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: DEM II.5 ACEC AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (DEM) II.6 ODS-OFFICE OF DAM SAFETY (DEM) DEP II.7 DRINKING WATER PROTECTION (DEP) II.8 GWDP-GROUND WATER DISCHARGE PERMIT (DEP) II.9 SECP-SEWER EXTENSION OR CONNECTION PERMIT (DEP) II.10 WMA-WATER MANAGEMENT ACT (DEP) II.11 NPDES -NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT (DEP) II.12 SWP-SOLID WASTE PERMIT (DSW) II.13 ORW- OUTSTANDING RESOURCES WATERS (DWM) II.14 LAC-LICENSE TO APPLY CHEMICALS (DWM) II.15 WPP-WETLAND PROTECTION PROGRAM (DWW) II.16 WRP-WETLAND RESTRICTION PROGRAM (DWW) II.17 C.91-WATERWAYS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 91 (DWW) II.18 401- 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION (DWW) DFA II.19 PESTICIDE BUREAU LICENSE (DFA) DFW II.20 DFW-DIVISION OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE (DFW) II.21 NHESP NATURAL HERITAGE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (DFW) EOEA II.22 CZM-MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (EOEA) II.23 MEPA -MASSACHUSETTS ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (EOEA) MDC II.24 MDC-METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION (MDC) MHC II.25 MHC-MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION (MHC) FEDERAL PERMITS AND REGULATIONS: II.26 NPDES - NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION PERMIT , U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Division of Fisheries and Game
    Public Document W No. 25 7 €t>e Commontoealtf) of jftaggatfyugettg ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Division of Fisheries and Game FOR THE Year ending November 30, 1925 1 1 Department '. ; of Conservation j\ -<•> ^ Publication of this Document approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance 00. 2-'26. Order 4198. CONTENTS PAGE General Considerations 3 Personnel 5 Finances 5 Conferences within the State 6 Activities outside the State 6 Acknowledgments 7 Enforcement of Laws 8 New Legislation 10 Education and Publicity 10 Biological Department 11 Wild Birds and Animals 12 Winter Feeding 12 Breeding Season 12 Fires 12 Posted Land 12 Migratory Birds 12 Song and Insectivorous Birds 12 Migratory Game Birds 13 Migratory Non-game Birds — Gulls and Terns 14 Federal Control of Migratory Birds J 4 Upland Game 13 The Hunting Season 15 Pheasant la Ruffed Grouse 15 Quail 16 Deer 16 Squirrels 17 Hares and Rabbits 17 Fur-bearing Animals 17 Enemies to Game 17 Reservations 18 Martha's Vineyard Reservation 18 Myles Standish State Forest 20 Penikese Island Sanctuary 20 Henry Cabot Lodge Bird Sanctuary (Egg Rock) 21 Isaac Sprague Bird Sanctuary (Carr Island) 21 Ram Island Sanctuary Mount Watatic Sanctuary Krjght Bird Refuge (Milk Island) 22 Reservations under SeHiwis 69-75, Chapter 131, General Laws . 22 Inland Fisheries ....'.* 23 General 21 Trout . : 2J Chinook Salmon 22 Pike Perch 23 WintbT Fishing and Pickerel 24 Bass 2j White Perch 24 Smelt 2k Horned Pout and Catfish 24 Ponds 2 Fishways 26 Pollution 30 C73 Jz- Propagation of Fish and Game . J0> 30 Fish Hatcheries and Game Farms 30 Field Propagation 37 Fish and Game Distribution 38 Marine Fisheries 42 Inspection of Fish 42 Commercial Fisheries Conference 46 The Deep Sea Fisheries 46 Shore Fisheries 54 The Lobster Fishery 54 Bounties on Seals 54 Mollusk Fisheries 54 Alewife 55 Appendix 57 €I)e Commonwealth of jmaggaclmjsettjS The Director of Fisheries and Game herewith presents the sixtieth annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Effects of Winter Drawdowns on the Ecological Character of Littoral Zones in Massachusetts Lakes
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses March 2020 INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES Jason R. Carmignani University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Carmignani, Jason R., "INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 1816. https://doi.org/10.7275/j5k1-fz29 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1816 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2020 Organismic and Evolutionary Biology © Copyright by Jason R. Carmignani 2020 All Rights Reserved INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTS OF WINTER DRAWDOWNS ON THE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER OF LITTORAL ZONES IN MASSACHUSETTS LAKES A Dissertation Presented by JASON R. CARMIGNANI Approved as to style and content by: ___________________________________ Allison H. Roy, Chair ___________________________________ Andy J. Danylchuk, Member ___________________________________ Cristina Cox Fernandes, Member ___________________________________ Peter D. Hazelton, Member ___________________________________ Jason T. Stolarksi, Member ___________________________________ Paige S.
    [Show full text]
  • WAKEFIELD Icinity State MASSACHUSETTS Code 025 County Code Zip Code 01880
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10244010 (Rav. 846) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Registration Form REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name HAKEFJ.&rlL MULTIPLE RESOURCE AREA_________________ other names/site number 2. Location street & number Mill TTPI F ot for publication city, town WAKEFIELD icinity state MASSACHUSETTS code 025 county code zip code 01880 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property private I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing public-local | district 159 buildings public-State I site _ sites I public-Federal | structure 41 structures | object 0 objects Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register Q_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ffl nomination EU request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Saugus-1953.Pdf
    Alg<g)g& JHaaaartfttaettB LOCAL HISTORY Ref. 352 Saugus ,66 AKKWAm «EP©S© X953 A 5foui lEnglanft Gfotmt (Statrfullij Ackttnwie&gea 3tB tynmt 5teafc Framed in the perspective of Saugus' typically Victorian Geometrically, the Saugus Civil War Memorial Monument is Town House—erected in 1875 after a titanic struggle which nearly also a masterpiece. The base is a parallelogram, with all above it divided the community into two separate towns—the beautiful to the base of the die, square in form, with projecting buttresses Civil War memorial monument shown on the front cover of this to the side statues, then square to the capstone, where it changes Town Report is the most valuable gift ever presented the citizens to octagonal. of Saugus. This most generous and impressive gift in the history of Saugus Its donor was the late Henry E. Hone of North Saugus, who was dedicated on July Fourth of 1895. More than 100 Civil War left $10,000 in his will for the express purpose of erecting a veterans of General E. W. Hinks Post 25, Grand Army of the memorial to the heroes of the Civil War. The granite shaft was Republic, of Saugus, led the line of march behind Commander carved by Sculptor M. H. Mosman of Chicopee and has been called C. D. Fiske. A detachment of 125 members of General Lander by some experts the "finest example of Civil War monumental Post 5 of Lynn joined the line of march at the East Saugus bridge sculpture on the American continent." and continued to Cliftondale and thence back to the Town Hall, The Monument is a modified form of Greek architecture, simple where 800 persons were served a buffet luncheon.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office for Administration and Finance Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Published February 15, 2019 Prepared by the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance Carol W. Gladstone, Commissioner This page was intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Report Organization 5 Table 1 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 11 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 2 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by County 17 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 3 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office and Agency 23 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 4 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Site and Municipality 85 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 5 Commonwealth Active Lease Agreements by Municipality 303 Private leases through DCAMM on behalf of state agencies APPENDICES Appendix I Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 311 Version of Table 1 above but for State-owned only (excludes Authorities) Appendix II County-Owned Buildings Occupied by Sheriffs and the Trial Court 319 Appendix III List of Conservation/Agricultural/Easements Held by the Commonwealth 323 Appendix IV Data Sources 381 Appendix V Glossary of Terms 385 Appendix VI Municipality Associated Counties Index Key 393 3 This page was intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices 1 - 5
    2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendices 1 - 5 Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/20 Reporting Cycle Draft for Public Comment Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Table of Contents Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 2. Assessment units and integrated list categories presented alphabetically by major watershed ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 3. Impairments added to the 2018/2020 integrated list .......................................................... 113 Appendix 4. Impairments removed from the 2018/2020 integrated list ................................................. 139 Appendix 5. Impairments changed from the prior reporting cycle .......................................................... 152 2 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Approval/Completion ATTAINS Action ID Report Title Date 5, 6 Total Maximum
    [Show full text]
  • Main Street Corridor Study
    Main Street Corridor Study Funding provided by the District Local Technical Assistance program and The Unified Planning Work Program Prepared for the Towns of Reading, Wakefield, and the City of Melrose January, 2012 Prepared by Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, 6th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Tel (617) 451-2770 www.mapc.org Acknowledgements The Main Street Corridor Study was developed by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) in partnership with the Towns of Reading and Wakefield and the City of Melrose. MAPC is Greater Boston’s regional planning agency whose mission is to promote smart growth and regional collaboration. The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) and the District Local Technical Assistance (DLTA) programs provided funding for this project. MAPC wishes to express our thanks to the Governor and the members of the Legislature for their continued support and funding of these programs. Alison Felix, AICP, Transportation Planner and Sarah Kurpiel, Transportation Engineer and Planner of MAPC were the principal authors of this report. MAPC staff who contributed to this project are: Joan Blaustein, Land Resources Planner Amanda Linehan, Communications Manager Eric Bourassa, Transportation Manager David Loutzenheiser, Transportation Planner Barry Fradkin, GIS Analyst Jean Zove, Web Communications Coordinator Eric Halvorsen, AICP, Transit Planner Several additional MAPC staff have had roles in this project, not all of whom have been named here. MAPC would like to thank the Town and City Planners of the three communities, as their advice, guidance, and input has been invaluable. Jean Delios, Town of Reading Community Services Director/Town Planner Paul Reavis, Town of Wakefield Planner Denise M.
    [Show full text]