Conservation Management Plan Victoria Bridge at Picton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Management Plan Victoria Bridge at Picton Victoria Bridge at Picton Conservation Management Plan Roads and Maritime Services | October 2018 BLANK PAGE Victoria Bridge at Picton Conservation Management Plan Roads and Maritime Services | October 2018 Prepared by Roads and Maritime Services Copyright: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of NSW Roads and Maritime Services. In keeping with the NSW Government’s commitment to encourage the availability of information, you are welcome to reproduce the material that appears in this Conservation Management Plan for personal, in-house or non-commercial use without formal permission or charge. All other rights are reserved. If you wish to reproduce, alter, store or transmit material appearing in the ‘Victoria Bridge at Picton Conservation Management Plan’ for any other purpose, a request for formal permission should be directed to Roads and Maritime Services, 20-44 Ennis Road, Milsons Point NSW 2061. Document controls Approval and authorisation Title Victoria Bridge at Picton Conservation Management Plan Accepted on behalf of NSW Roads and Maritime Services by: Sally Durham, Director Environment Regions Signed: Dated: 31/1/19 Executive summary The purpose of this Conservation Management Plan (CMP) is to guide the conservation and management of Victoria Bridge, ensuring a continuing role and use in the life of the community. Description of the Item Victoria Bridge over Stonequarry Creek at Picton is an Allan type timber truss bridge which has been assessed as being of State significance, and is listed on the New South Wales State Heritage Register (SHR). The bridge is located on Prince Street in the township of Picton in the Shire of Wollondilly approximately 82 km southwest of Sydney. The bridge spans a steep valley and is particularly picturesque. Victoria Bridge was constructed by the Department of Public Works in 1897 and is under the care and control of Roads and Maritime Services (Roads and Maritime). The bridge is approximately 80 m long and 6 m wide, consisting of three 90 foot (90’ or 27.432 m) Allan type truss spans. The three spans are supported on two timber trestle piers and two timber abutments. The bridge carries a pedestrian footway and a single lane of light traffic with a five tonne posted load limit. Victoria Bridge is important to the local and regional community, being highly esteemed for its historical value and its contribution to the town’s sense of identity as a historical town. It is also of substantial importance for its amenity, providing a vital link for pedestrians, and an important bypass to reduce congestion in the main part of town. Statement of Significance Victoria Bridge at Picton is of State significance as an early example of an Allan truss road bridge. As a timber truss road bridge, it has strong associations with the expansion of the road network and economic activity throughout New South Wales, and with Percy Allan (1861-1930), then Chief Draftsman, an eminent engineer, and the designer of this truss type. Allan became Chief Engineer, National and Local Government Works, and made considerable contributions to various engineering institutions both in Australia and overseas. He was awarded a Telford Premium for one of his papers. Allan trusses were the third in the five-stage development of New South Wales timber truss road bridges. The trusses took advantage of the available high quality NSW hardwoods, known to be among the strongest and most durable in the world. The design is an example of innovative and efficient timber engineering in a time when budgets were tight. The evolution in design shows the growing knowledge of timber as a structural material, the increasing difficulty in obtaining long timbers of large cross-section, and the need for durable and maintainable bridge designs. The bridge exhibits the technical excellence of its design, as the structural details which distinguish it as an Allan truss are clearly visible, considerably assisted by the designated pedestrian access which has been provided along the length of the bridge from which excellent views can be obtained of almost all of the structural design details. These design details would otherwise be almost impossible to appreciate on a bridge of this scale given the very limited views from off the bridge. An outstanding feature of Victoria Bridge is the very tall timber trestle piers on which the trusses are supported, the tallest piers of their type in New South Wales. The bridge displays the original colour scheme and largely performs the function for which it was originally designed, which was to carry traffic and pedestrians. Victoria Bridge is representative at the State level as a fine example of an Allan truss bridge, including all of the principal characteristics of the early 90’ Allan truss design, and also due to its integrity to the original Victoria Bridge at Picton i Conservation Management Plan design as an early Allan truss. It is also outstanding due to the esteem in which it is held, particularly by the local community. Conservation Policies The following table details conservation policies which apply to Victoria Bridge. All policies that apply to the suite of timber truss bridges across New South Wales are set out comprehensively in the Overarching Conservation Management Plan (2018). Policy 1 Retention of the cultural significance of Victoria Bridge a) Cultural significance of this bridges will be protected or enhanced b) Conservation will be in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter c) All current and future owners, managers and consent authorities will be advised and jointly responsible for conservation d) Conservation will be done in collaboration with relevant experts Policy 2 Adoption, implementation and review of the CMP a) Roads and Maritime will adopt this CMP b) Roads and Maritime will resource implementation of this CMP c) Roads and Maritime will train relevant staff in the use of this CMP d) Roads and Maritime will make this CMP available to the public e) Roads and Maritime will review this CMP every five years and submit to the Heritage Council for endorsement Policy 3 Use of the bridge a) The continued use of Victoria Bridge as a functioning crossing for vehicles and pedestrians is integral to its cultural significance and survival. New work will be required to adapt to changing transportation needs. Policy 4 Maintenance and repair a) Appropriate ongoing repair and maintenance will be carried out b) Roads and Maritime will prepare an Incident Response Plan for Victoria Bridge c) The bridge will be maintained to support both functionality and form d) The bridge will be regularly inspected by specialists. e) Termites will be inspected for and treated. f) Necessary support structures may be used for maintenance and repair but will be temporary and removed when no longer needed. Policy 5 New work a) Elements will be conserved in accordance with their level of significance b) New works and adaptations may be required to ensure continued operability c) Excellence in design and quality in construction will be provided d) Roads and Maritime will explore and develop the use of new means by with the bridges may continue to fulfil their required functions e) Approvals will be undertaken in accordance with relevant processes Victoria Bridge at Picton ii Conservation Management Plan Policy 6 Interpretation a) Cultural significance of this bridge will be effectively communicated b) Interpretation of Victoria bridge will be based on the NSW State historical themes and analyses documented in this CMP c) Roads and Maritime will design and install a sign and a plaque an interpretation of a timber bottom chord. Policy 7 Protection and enhancement of visual setting a) Development in the vicinity is to be carefully managed not to have an unacceptable visual impact b) Signage in the vicinity should be minimized c) Vegetation in the vicinity of the bridges should be kept to a minimum d) Relevant planning and statutory controls must be adhered to Policy 8 Archival recording a) Records will be managed to ensure permanent retention as State records b) Photographic archival recording before, during and after any works c) A complete archival recording will be undertaken of Victoria bridge d) Full documentation of methods and materials used during any works e) Representative sample retained as a moveable heritage collection f) Information used to assist effective heritage interpretation of population Policy 9 Archaeology a) Relevant Aboriginal stakeholders will be consulted about any proposed impact b) The Roads and Maritime Cultural Heritage Guidelines and the archaeological provisions of the Heritage Act 1977 will be adhered to. c) The Roads and Maritime Unexpected Heritage Items Procedure will be followed to manage any unexpected finds during works Policy 10 Exemptions and Approvals a) Routine maintenance (Appendix A Table 1) can proceed without notification to the Heritage Council. b) Works identified in Table 2 in Appendix A will need approval/consent advice sought from the Heritage Division regarding the nature/type of approval required prior to works being planned. c) Works identified in Table 3 in Appendix A will need approval in writing from the Heritage Council or delegate. Bridge Specific Policies Policy 11 Top Chords Policy 12 Bottom Chords Policy 13 Principals and Diagonals Policy 14 Tension Rods Policy 15 Cast Iron Shoes Victoria Bridge at Picton iii Conservation Management Plan Policy 16 Sway Braces Policy 17 Cross Girders Policy 18 Stringers and Decking Policy 19 Railing Policy 20 Piers Policy 21 Abutments Bridge Specific Conservation Policies and Conservation Works In order to adequately demonstrate the strength and durability of the materials or original design, timber truss bridges must remain a vital part of the NSW road infrastructure, which necessitates some elements being modified as transport needs develop. The cultural significance of Victoria Bridge is found primarily in the trusses so it is critical that any work on the bridge does not detract from the interpretation or appreciation of the Allan trusses.
Recommended publications
  • NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy
    NORTH WEST Freight Transport Strategy Department of Infrastructure NORTH WEST FREIGHT TRANSPORT STRATEGY Final Report May 2002 This report has been prepared by the Department of Infrastructure, VicRoads, Mildura Rural City Council, Swan Hill Rural City Council and the North West Municipalities Association to guide planning and development of the freight transport network in the north-west of Victoria. The State Government acknowledges the participation and support of the Councils of the north-west in preparing the strategy and the many stakeholders and individuals who contributed comments and ideas. Department of Infrastructure Strategic Planning Division Level 23, 80 Collins St Melbourne VIC 3000 www.doi.vic.gov.au Final Report North West Freight Transport Strategy Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i 1. Strategy Outline. ...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Strategy Outcomes.................................................................................................................1 1.3 Planning Horizon.....................................................................................................................1 1.4 Other Investigations ................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Balranald Mineral Sands Project 1 Commonwealth Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for Iluka Resources Limited July 2016
    Volume Balranald Mineral Sands Project 1 Commonwealth Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for Iluka Resources Limited July 2016 Main Report Appendix A - Environmental Impact Statement Guidelines Appendix B - Study Team Volume 1 Executive summary Table of contents Part A Introduction, site and context, regulatory framework and consultation Part B Environmental impact statement Part C Commitments and justification and conclusion References Acronyms and abbreviations Appendix A Environmental impact statement guidelines Appendix B Study team Volume 2 Appendix C Biodiversity Assessment Volume 3 Appendix D Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Volume 4 Appendix E Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Appendix F Rehabilitation and Closure Strategy Appendix G Water Assessment Appendix H Groundwater Dependant Ecosystems Assessment Report Volume 5 Appendix I Balranald Mineral Sands Project Groundwater Assessment Appendix J Surface Water Management Report Appendix K Geochemistry Assessment Volume 6 Appendix L Radiation Risk Assessment Appendix M Social Assessment Appendix N Economic Assessment wwwcom.au www.iluka.com BalranaldMineralSandsProject CommonwealthEnvironmentalImpactStatement PreparedforIlukaResourcesLimited|18July2016 GroundFloor,Suite01,20ChandosStreet StLeonards,NSW,2065 T+61 2 94939500 F+61294939599 [email protected] www.emmconsulting.com.au BalranaldMineralSandsProject Final ReportJ12011RP14|PreparedforIlukaResourcesLimited|18July2016 Prepared CassandraThompson JarredKramer Approved BrettMcLennan by
    [Show full text]
  • Tooleybuc Bridge Replacement Preferred Option Report
    Tooleybuc Bridge Replacement Preferred Option Report September 2015 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Tooleybuc Bridge Replacement Preferred Option Report Executive summary Tooleybuc is on the NSW/Victorian border in far south western NSW, around 730km from Sydney and around 350km from Melbourne. The current bridge over the Murray River includes timber beam approach spans, two timber truss spans and a steel lift span all of which have increasing maintenance needs at a cost to both state Governments. The bridge is on a freight route connecting NSW to Victoria and is also an alternative freight route between NSW and South Australia. A replacement Tooleybuc Bridge is included in the NSW Government’s Bridges for the Bush Program which aims to reduce maintenance costs and improve freight efficiency. Three strategic options (see Appendix B and C) have been developed for a replacement bridge: Purple lift span bridge Blue lift span bridge Yellow high level bridge Options assessment has compared how well the options meet project objectives. Option assessment has taken road alignment, future maintenance costs, environmental factors and local community feedback into account. Project objectives include providing a reliable connection across the river and providing for Higher Mass Limit vehicles. Each option meets these objectives equally. The Yellow Option best meets the project objective to reduce ongoing maintenance costs. This option is the only option without a lift span. A large portion of project benefits comes from maintenance savings and installing a new lift span greatly reduces these savings. Lift span bridges require far more inspections and routine maintenance activities than fixed span bridges do.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Authority of New South Wales, 1980-81
    Annual Report 1980-81 TRAFFIC AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Chairman, J.W. Davies I.S.O. O.St.J., B.Ec, F.C.l.T. The Hon. P.F. Cox, M.P., F.C.l.T. Minister for Transport, SYDNEY 2000 Dear Mr. Cox, It is my pleasure to submit to you the Annual Report of the Traffic Authority of New South Wales for the year ended 30th June, 1981. The report outlines the functions and responsibilities of the Authority as well as activities undertaken during the year under review. A comparative financial statement for this year and the previous year is also included. Yours faithfully L066646 ANNUAL REPORT 1980-81 CONTENTS Constitution 3 Other Legislation 3 Members of the Traffic Authority 5 Principal Officers 5 Organisational Chart 6 Organisation and Management 7 Policies and Objectives 8 Committees 9 Other Instrumentalities 11 The Year Under Review 12 Traffic Management Schemes 16 Research 21 Traffic Engineering Works 25 Finance 29 Publications 32 155N-0314-3364. 2. Constitution Tne Trafflc Authority of New South Wales is constituted under the Traffic Authority Act, 1976 as a statutory corporation representing the Crown. There are five official members and four members appointed by the Minister for Transport, six of whom form a quorum. Under the Traffic Authority Act, the Authority has, subject to the control and direction of the Minister for Transport, the responsibility of: • reviewing traffic arrangements in the State and formulating or adopting plans and proposals for the improvement of those arrangements; 0 establishing general standards and principles in connection with the design and provision of traffic control facilities, and priorities for carrying out activities, works or services that are items of approved expenditure; 0 promoting traffic safety; • Co-ordinating the activities of public authorities when they are directly involved in matters connected with the Authority's functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Crane Network
    MOBILE CRANES MAP REFERENCE LIST RESTRICTION DESCRIPTIONS - SPV Level 1 / SPV Level 1 & UAC / SPV Level 1 & UPC Code Bridge Name Road Name Description Road Class BN 24 Princes Hwy Bridge on King St over Railway at St. Peter's Station State BN 29 Tom Ugly's Bridge Princes Hwy Northbound Bridge over George's River at Sylvania State BN 143 Sir Bertram Stevens Bridge over Flat Rock Creek No2 at Royal National Park State Dr BN 172 Stahallen Ave Bridge over Flat Rock Creek at Northbridge State BN 226 Sydney Harbour Bradfield Hwy Bridge over Sydney Harbour State Bridge BN 316 Great Western Hwy Bridge on Parramatta Rd over Duck Creek at Granville State BN 333 Victoria Bridge Great Western Hwy Bridge over Nepean River at Penrith State BN 339 Pacific Hwy Bridge over Railway at Cowan State BN 360 Lennox Bridge Church St Bridge over Parramatta River at Parramatta Local BN 390 Galston Rd Bridge over Pearces (Tunks) Creek at Galston State BN 413 St. Albans Bridge Wollombi Rd Bridge over Macdonald River at St. Albans Regional BN 415 The Putty Rd Bridge on Bridge St over Hawkesbury River at Windsor State BN 548 Bridge Rd Bridge over Northern Railway at Hornsby State BN 856 Lawrence Hargrave Bridge over Stanwell Creek at Stanwell Park State Dr BN 875 Hampden Bridge Moss Vale Rd Bridge over Kangaroo River at Kangaroo Valley State BN 965 Victoria Bridge Prince St Bridge over Stonequarry Creek at Picton Local BN 1015 Abercrombie Bridge Goulburn-Ilford Rd Bridge on Abercrombie Rd over Abercrombie River 67.16km State north of Crookwell BN 1141 Bells Line of
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-1930 Metal Bridges Study of the Heritage Significance of Pre-1930 RTA Controlled Metal Road Bridges in NSW
    Pre-1930 Metal Bridges Study of the Heritage Significance of Pre-1930 RTA Controlled Metal Road Bridges in NSW 1998 57 Historical Overview of Bridge Types in NSW: Extract from the Study of Heritage Significance of Pre-1930 RTA Controlled Metal Road Bridges in NSW HISTORY OF METAL ROAD BRIDGES IN NSW 1.1 Historical Review The chronological list of metal bridges supplied with the Brief provides a convenient framework for this historical review for which there are the following principal papers: • The First 60 Years of Metal Bridges in New South Wales (Fraser D.J. 1986); • Moveable Span Bridges in New South Wales prior to 1915 (Fraser D.J. 1985); • Curved-tracked Bascule Bridges in New South Wales and their relationship to the Cardioid (M A B Deakin and D. J. Fraser 1995); • The Roadmakers (Department of Main Roads New South Wales 1976); • Bridge Building in New South Wales 1788-1938 (Department of Main Roads New South Wales); • All About Bridges (Department of Main Roads New South Wales 1970); • issues of Main Roads (Department of Main Roads New South Wales); • Highway Bridge Construction. The Practice in New South Wales 1924 six-part series (Percy Allan 1924). Other references are cited where they are relevant. However, the supplied list does not indicate what type of bridge each entry is (arch, truss, girder/beam or moveable span), nor the material used (cast iron (CI), wrought iron (WI) or steel). This limits the ability of the list to convey a historical overview or to give any evidence of trends in the use of each type of bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Crane Network
    MOBILE CRANES MAP REFERENCE LIST RESTRICTION DESCRIPTIONS - SPV Level 4 & 12t axle / SPV Level 4 & 12t axle & UAC / SPV Level 4 & 12t axle & UPC Code Bridge Name Road Name Description Road Class BN 24 Princes Hwy Bridge on King St over Railway at St. Peter's Station State BN 25 Princes Hwy Bridge over Goods Railway at Sydenham State BN 28 Skidmore's Bridge Princes Hwy Bridge over Muddy Creek at Rockdale State BN 29 Tom Ugly's Bridge Princes Hwy Northbound Bridge over George's River at Sylvania State BN 31 Princes Hwy Bridge on Acacia Rd over Railway at Kirrawee State BN 38 Brown St Bridge over Parramatta Rd at Lewisham State BN 40 Battle Bridge Great Western Hwy Bridge on Parramatta Rd over Hawthorne Canal at Ashfield State BN 42c Pacific Hwy Bridge over Railway at St. Leonards (ONLY ONE CRANE IS State PERMITTED TO TRAVEL ON THIS BRIDGE IN EACH DIRECTION AT ANY ONE TIME) BN 44 Pacific Hwy Bridge over Railway at Turramurra State BN 55 Pittwater Rd Bridge over Dee Why Lagoon at Dee Why State BN 57 Pittwater Rd Bridge(No2) over Narrabeen Lake north of Narrabeen State BN 58 Pittwater Rd Bridge over Mullet Creek north of Narrabeen State BN 81 Forest Rd Bridge over Railway at Arncliffe State BN 98 Bentley's Bridge Bayswater Rd Eastbound Bridge over Park Creek (Channel) at Rushcutter's State Bay BN 124 King George's Rd Bridge on King George's Rd over Railway at Penshurst State BN 125 King George's Rd Bridge on King George's Rd over Railways at Beverly Hills State Station BN 126 King George's Rd Bridge over Railway at Wiley Park Station State
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Class 1 Agricultural Vehicles (Notice) 2015 (No
    Commonwealth of Australia Gazette Published by the Commonwealth of Australia GOVERNMENT NOTICES HEAVY VEHICLE NATIONAL LAW New South Wales Class 1 Agricultural Vehicles (Notice) 2015 (No. 1) This notice revokes the Class 1 Agricultural Vehicles Notice 2014 published in the New South Wales Government Gazette No. 15 of 7 February 2014, at page 426 to 459 and replaces it with Schedule 1. 1 Purpose (1) The purpose of this notice is to exempt the stated categories of class 1 heavy vehicles from the prescribed mass and dimension requirements specified in the notice subject to the conditions specified in the notice. 2 Authorising Provision(s) (1) This notice is made under Section 117, and Section 23 of Schedule 1, of the Heavy Vehicle National Law as in force in each participating jurisdiction. 3 Title (1) This notice may be cited as the New South Wales Class 1 Agricultural Vehicles (Notice) 2015 (No. 1) 4 Period of operation (1) This notice commences on the date of its publication in the Commonwealth Gazette and is in force for a period of five years from and including the date of commencement. 5 Definitions and interpretation (1) In this Instrument— (a) any reference to a provision of, or term used in, the former legislation, is to be taken to be a reference to the corresponding provision of, or nearest equivalent term used in, the Heavy Vehicle National Law; and (b) former legislation, means the Road Transport (Mass, Loading and Access) Regulation 2005 (NSW) and the Road Transport (Vehicle and Driver Management) Act 2005 (NSW); and (c) National Regulation means the Heavy Vehicle (Mass, Dimension and Loading) National Regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • REDISTRIBUTION 20151216Reissue3
    AUSCRIPT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED ACN 110 028 825 T: 1800 AUSCRIPT (1800 287 274) E: [email protected] W: www.auscript.com.au TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS O/N H-629669 AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION NEW SOUTH WALES REDISTRIBUTION PUBLIC HEARING PRESIDING: THE HON D COWDROY OAM QC (Chairperson of the Australian Electoral Commission) MR D KALISCH (Australian Statistician and member of the Australian Electoral Commission) MR T ROGERS (Electoral Commissioner, Australian Electoral Commission) MR D ORR (Australian Electoral Officer for New South Wales, Australian Electoral Commission) MR T WHITFIELD PSM (Acting Auditor-General of New South Wales) MR D MOONEY (Surveyor General of New South Wales) LOCATION: WESLEY CONFERENCE CENTRE 220 PITT STREET SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES DATE: 9.37 AM, WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2015 .REDISTRIBUTION 16.12.15R3 P-1 ©Auscript Australasia Pty Limited CHAIRPERSON: Welcome to this hearing for the Australian Electoral Commission for NSW, that is, the augmented Commission. This is the first of two hearings which are to be held in relation to the proposed redistribution. Today in Sydney and on Friday this week the augmented Commission goes to Port Macquarie. Let me 5 introduce who is on this table: my name is Dennis Cowdroy, I am the chairman of the Australian Electoral Commission. The other members present are Mr David Kalisch, immediately on my right, who is the Commonwealth Statistician. Mr Tom Rogers on my left is the Commissioner, 10 that is the Electoral Commissioner. The other members who make up the augmented Commission are Mr Tony Whitfield, the acting Auditor-General of NSW on my far right, and to my far left is Mr Doug Orr, the NSW Officer of the Australian Electoral Commission, and to his right is Mr Des Mooney, the Surveyor General for NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publicationwijayaratna Phd Thesis
    Modelling Disrupted Transport Network Behaviour By Kasun Wijayaratna B.E (Honours Class 1), B.Comm A thesis presented in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of New South Wales September 2016 Modelling Disrupted Transport Network Behaviour COPYRIGHT AND AUTHENTICITY STATEMENTS Copyright Statement ‘I hereby grant the University of New South Wales or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or part in the University libraries in all forms of media, now or here after known, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. I also authorise University Microfilms to use the 350 word abstract of my thesis in Dissertation Abstract International (this is applicable to doctoral theses only). I have either used no substantial portions of copyright material in my thesis or I have obtained permission to use copyright material; where permission has not been granted I have applied/will apply for a partial restriction of the digital copy of my thesis or dissertation.' Signed ……………………………………………………. Date ………10/09/2016……………………................ Authenticity Statement ‘I certify that the Library deposit digital copy is a direct equivalent of the final officially approved version of my thesis. No emendation of content has occurred and if there are any minor variations in formatting, they are the result of the conversion to digital format.’ Signed …………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for Public Exhibition
    Homebush Bay Bridge l Environmental Assessment PART C Assessment of environmental impacts Chapter 7 l Environmental risk analysis 7 Environmental risk analysis This Chapter provides an overview of the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed bridge, and outlines the mitigation measures to be implemented to minimise these impacts. It specifically addresses the requirement of the Director General that the environmental assessment must include: ∕ An environmental risk analysis to identify potential environmental impacts associated with the project (construction and operation), proposed mitigation measures and potentially significant residual environmental impacts after the application of proposed mitigation measures. ∕ An appropriately detailed impact assessment of any additional key environmental impact that is identified through the environmental risk analysis. 7.1 Risk analysis approach The following methodology was used to identify and assess the potential environmental issues associated with construction and operation of the proposed bridge: ∕ Identify all relevant potential environmental impacts of the development, including the key issues outlined in the Director General’s requirements. ∕ Assess each of the potential environmental impacts using a risk assessment model, taking into consideration their likelihood and consequence. ∕ Outline potential mitigation measures to address the potential environmental impacts, and assess the likely residual environmental impacts after the mitigation measures are to be applied. The risk assessment model used to assess the potential environmental impacts is shown in Table 7.1. This model provides the basis for the detailed assessment of key environmental issues provided in this environmental assessment. Table 7.1 – Environmental risk assessment model Risk category Description A May have high or moderate impacts. Detailed assessment necessary to determine the level of potential impact and to develop appropriate measures to mitigate and manage the impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Shire Planning Committee
    Business Paper Shire Planning Committee Monday, 3 September 2018 6.30pm Council Chambers, Level 2, Administration Building, 4-20 Eton Street, Sutherland Shire Planning Committee 3 September 2018 ORDER OF BUSINESS 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY 2. APOLOGIES 3. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST 4. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETINGS 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. REPORTS FROM OFFICERS PLN040-18 Quarterly Report Clause 4.6 Variations Register PLN041-18 Further Amendments to SSLEP 2015 PLN042-18 The Low Rise Medium Density Code - Options for Implementation PLN043-18 Infrastructure in the Sutherland Shire PLN044-18 Results of Exhibition of Draft Amended Strategy for Finalisation of old S94 and S94A Plans 7. QUESTIONS 8. CONSIDERATION OF BUSINESS IN CLOSED SESSION 9. CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS FROM OFFICERS Page 2 Shire Planning Committee 3 September 2018 18 PLN040-18 QUARTERLY REPORT CLAUSE 4.6 VARIATIONS REGISTER - Attachments: Appendix A⇩ PLN040 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Secretary of Department of Planning & Environment delegates to councils assumed concurrence to use Clause 4.6 (previously known as SEPP 1) to vary development standards in respect of most types of development. Councils are required to monitor the use of the Secretary’s assumed concurrence and report to the Department of Planning & Environment on that usage on a quarterly basis. Councils are also required to report all variations approved under delegation to a meeting of Council on a quarterly basis. This report provides a list of variations approved under delegation for the quarter 1 April 2018 to 30 June 2018 (Appendix A). REPORT RECOMMENDATION That the quarterly report on Clause 4.6 Variations be received and noted.
    [Show full text]