There's More to Refraction Than

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

There's More to Refraction Than There’s More To Refraction Than “Better One or Two” Light travels in waves like ripples on a pond. The wave front consists of rays perpendicular to its surface. When light passes through an interface (glass, water, etc), the light rays are bent. This is called refraction. Refraction is bending light rays and Points Regarding Vergence altering their vergence! * The curvature of the wave front depends Examples: on its radius. The further from its origin, the A wave 1 meter away has a vergence less the curvature. Curvature determines of 1D. Vergence at 0.5 meter is 2D. vergence. Vergence at 2 meters is 0.5D. * Vergence is measured in Diopters. * Curvature (vergence) varies inversely with the distance… shorter the distance, + Diopters = convergence greater the vergence. - Diopters = divergence Think about it …….. IF a patient is The ability of a farsighted (hyperopic), substance to slow the light rays are and bend rays of projected behind the light is described as eye. You need to use its refractive index. plus lenses to The refractive index of any medium will converge the rays be greater than 1.0. The greater the medium forward onto the retina. slows light, the higher its refractive index. eyecaretyler.com mrziegler.com 1 Divergence Light rays Natural light strike a emits rays that are surface at an divergent and have angle. negative vergence. When the ray passes through the interface it has a new angle (angle of refraction). gcsescience.com faxswitch.com Refractive Errors Convergence “Ametropia” Refractive errors are discussed in terms of “far points” Far Point: that point in space which is conjugate with the fovea when accommodation is relaxed. IF you locate the far point, you will It is called positive vergence when a lens know the power of the lens. EX: IF rays landing on the fovea come from converges light rays. infinity ( ∞ ), the patient is emmetropic (no error). IF they fall elsewhere, they are ametropic ! Where Else Could They Fall? Emmetropia Hyperopia: focuses behind Absence of refractive error. the eye Parallel rays of light (from infinity) are Myopia: focuses in the focused on the fovea. vitreous area No lenses are needed so we consider the Astigmatism: patient plano. two focal points drugs.com lincolnvisioncenter.com 2 Spherical Ametropias Ametropias can occur because of: Refractive surfaces of the eye curves a. variations in the axial length equally in all meridians then the eye has a of the eye spherical refraction. The light is b. shifts in the lens location brought to a focus point by the cornea and the lens. The cornea’s curvature is c. errors in the curvature of ideally matched to the the cornea or lens length of the normal eye. d. any of the above There is no astigmatism that needs to be Lenses are needed to correct these. corrected for. shorelinevision.com Hyperopia Myopia “Farsighted” “Nearsighted” Deficient refractive power – Excessive refractive not enough positive or power where parallel plus power. The cornea is rays are refracted too not curved enough or much and are focused in the eye is too long. front of the retina. The Rays are being focused behind the eye at a point cornea is too curved or the eye is too long. beyond infinity. Plus The far point is located somewhere between lenses will converge the infinity and the eye. Minus lenses diverge rays on the retina. the rays backward onto the retina. shorelinevision.com Aspherical Ametropias In the average person, the cornea does not Light is focused in (2) have the same refracting surfaces in all meridians differently. meridians. When this Flatter 180° refracts the happens, the patient least whereas the steeper 90° refracts the has astigmatism. This most! type of corneal Each of these meridians surface is called applies a different toric (shaped like a vergence so there are two football) principal focal points. researchcenters.info 3 “Sins When Performing Refraction vs.. Refractometry Refractometry” Refraction: The sum of the subjective When I was learning refractometry, I was told the number one sin and objective steps that was overminusing a patient. leads to a decision by the I actually believe the number one doctor of a prescription. sin is underplussing a patient, followed closely by overminusing - and in both cases- they occur for Refractometry: Measurement of the this main reason……..listening too refractive error… what much to what the patient “wants” the technicians do and not giving them what they “need”. Underplus Common complaints: Hyperopic eyes are what I call martyr eyes. * I used to love to read but now They need glasses – but their brain doesn’t want the help. So, I am so tired at the end of the the brain works and works to keep day it’s no fun things in focus. They get tired * I used to wear glasses when I and some people even complain of was younger but I outgrew it headaches or upset stomach. * I am 33 years old and need They are not hurting themselves, bifocals to read they are “bugging” themselves. Overminus Myopic eyes are “piggy eyes”. Be careful of listening too They want all the anatomical much to what they “want” . power present and more. They They may “need” +3.50 to don’t need more… they just want correct their hyperopia, but it. their brain might tell IF you give it to them, and they them they only need +1.00. My personal are under 35 y.o. or so, they usually best: gentleman came to our office (5) times don’t have an issue (except for the in a year with the same complaints. 34 y.o. fact you have given too much power). After 35 or so, (5) different techs. He “wanted” to be a they begin to have issues with reading, and will tell you -3.00sp… he “needed” to be a +4.50sp they take their glasses off to read !!!! 4 What is the Answer ?? So, in this case, you are listening too much The best way to know if and doing what the patient “wants” you are overminusing or – and not doing what they need. underplussing someone is the When you are refining, ask retinoscope. The retinoscope will give you them : “ better one, better two the anatomical answer to what the patient’s or about the same”… if you don’t give them an out, they will continue true refraction is. Then you do a minimal to pick more minus because it subjective “one or two”. That way the patient makes it look darker – and to the gets what I see (what they need) and not what brain – darker is better. they want (overminus or under plus) ! Pearls And…..more pearls “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” • Don’t give them what they want, give them what they need. IF a patient states they see well, no complaints, and their vision is good (20/30 or better), don’t make • Learn to retinoscope! big changes to their Rx unless they “need” it – my gentleman actually saw 20/25 • Listen to the patients complaint – and then with his wrong Rx – he was just miserable. find the answer for the complaint. For example: original: -1.00+0.75 x 180 ( 20/25-2) • For every 0.25D you give a patient – they should new: -1.75 + 1.25x 21 (20/25+2) When I asked the tech why the big change – the improve one line. answer was ???????????????????? • Patients will tolerate bigger changes to their sphere than they will to their cylinder and axis. Make sure it’s a good change! Refractor Parts of the Phoropter “Phoropter” Three groups of discs… * spheres * cylinders * accessories The lenses are in 0.25D increments ranging from -19.0 to +17.0 and cylinders to 6.0D 5 Vertex Distance is 12mm when the phoropter is in the correct position SubjectiveTesting Patients experience a great deal of anxiety Large dial controls over this testing procedure especially when sphere the examiner goes too quickly or gives the Cylinder controls for patient too many choices…. power and axis “ Better one or two…three or four…. five or six…” Occluder, pinhole Be careful of badgering the patient or appearing to be bored Pupillary distance with the “routine”… and – give Level the patient an out !!!! Order of Refinement “Better one or two – or about the same” !! A. Sphere until they get to 20/40 B. Cylinder axis IF you don’t give them an out, you will get C. Cylinder Power chased around the dial because you are Always go for the most plus (or less minus) asking them for an answer. The goal is to that you can give. Put the chart up on the get them where it is about the same. screen to show 20/200 through 20/20 and Patients get frustrated and will begin to have them read the smallest line they can see. guess at the answer they think you want ! EX: The patient reads 20/60 . Example This is (6) lines away from 20/20. Give them another 0.25 sphere. (6) x 0.25D = 1.50 + whatever cylinder They now read 20/40 fighting. Using the Jackson cross part of After performing the auto refractor or your phoropter, adjust the cylinder axis. retinoscopy - put the prescription in the When the patient states that they are about phoropter. This is your starting point . power the same, adjust the cylinder – In our head we will not want to increase or again 0.25 at a time. And again, looking for decrease that 1.50 unless they can read improvement in the vision measured by another line better.
Recommended publications
  • Binocular Vision and the Stroop Test
    1040-5488/16/9302-0194/0 VOL. 93, NO. 2, PP. 194Y208 OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE Copyright * 2015 American Academy of Optometry REVIEW Binocular Vision and the Stroop Test Franc¸ois Daniel* and ZoB Kapoula† ABSTRACT Purpose. Recent studies report a link between optometric results, learning disabilities, and problems in reading. This study examines the correlations between optometric tests of binocular vision, namely, of vergence and accommodation, reading speed, and cognitive executive functions as measured by the Stroop test. Methods. Fifty-one students (mean age, 20.43 T 1.25 years) were given a complete eye examination. They then performed the reading test L’Alouette and the Stroop interference test at their usual reading distance. Criteria for selection were the absence of significant refractive uncorrected error, strabismus, amblyopia, color vision defects, and other neurologic findings. Results. The results show a correlation between positive fusional vergences (PFVs) at near distance and the interference effect (IE) in the Stroop test: the higher the PFV value is, the less the IE. Furthermore, the subgroup of 11 students presenting convergence insufficiency, according to Scheiman and Wick criteria (2002), showed a significantly higher IE during the Stroop test than the other students (N = 18) who had normal binocular vision without symptoms at near. Importantly, there is no correlation between reading speed and PFV either for the entire sample or for the subgroups. Conclusions. These results suggest for the first time a link between convergence capacity and the interference score in the Stroop test. Such a link is attributable to the fact that vergence control and cognitive functions mobilize the same cortical areas, for example, parietofrontal areas.
    [Show full text]
  • And Minus Cylinder Subjective Refraction Techniques for Clinicians January 2016
    Mark E Wilkinson, OD Plus and Minus Cylinder Subjective Refraction Techniques for Clinicians January 2016 General Refraction Techniques Prior to starting your refraction, baseline visual acuities (OD, OS and OU) must be determined. For individuals with near vision complaints, and all presbyopes, near acuity should also be documented using M notation, with the testing distance documented if different than 16 inches (40 centimeters). Accurately assessing visual acuity is important for many reasons. It allows the clinician to: § Determine best corrected acuity with refraction § Monitor the effect of treatment and/or progression of disease § Estimate the dioptric power of optical devices necessary for reading regular size print § Verify eligibility for tasks such as driving § Verify eligibility as “legally blind” When measuring distance acuity, there is no longer a need to measure visual acuity in a darkened room. In the past, when projected charts were used, the room lights had to be lowered for better contrast on the chart. Now, with high definition LCD monitor acuity charts and ETDRS charts, contrast is no longer an issue. Additionally, for some patients, particularly those with difficulties adjusting to lower lighting conditions, taking them from a normally lit waiting room into a darkened clinic or work up room will artificially lower their acuity, because they do not have enough time for their eyes to adjust to the lower light conditions. Because clinical decisions are based on these acuity measurements, accurate assessment of each person’s acuity is critically important. With this in mind, all acuity testing should be done with the overhead lights on in the exam or work up room.
    [Show full text]
  • Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction
    OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction OPTOMETRY: THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION Doctors of optometry are independent primary health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. There are approximately 36,000 full-time-equivalent doctors of optometry currently in practice in the United States. Optometrists practice in more than 6,500 communities across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care providers in more than 3,500 communities. The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all of which enhance the quality of life. OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH ACCOMMODATIVE AND VERGENCE DYSFUNCTION Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D., Principal Author Carole R. Burns, O.D. Susan A. Cotter, O.D. Kent M. Daum, O.D., Ph.D. John R. Griffin, M.S., O.D. Mitchell M. Scheiman, O.D. Revised by: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D. December 2010 Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: David A.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NONZERO TARGET Differences Between Refractive Cylinder and Corneal Astigmatism Make a Difference
    PRACTICAL ASTIGMATISM THE NONZERO TARGET Differences between refractive cylinder and corneal astigmatism make a difference. BY NOEL ALPINS, AM, FRANZCO, FRCOPHTH, FACS; PARAG A. MAJMUDAR, MD; AND KARL G. STONECIPHER, MD theory, ablating +2.00 D x 20º onto often described as lenticular, astigmatism. a cornea with cylinder measured at In many cases, the lenticular portion of 1.50 D @ 10º would leave 0.78 D x astigmatism changes over time, often 40º ORA. This is what is termed the because of accommodation. For this nonzero target. It would be only by reason, with the advent of topography- NOEL ALPINS, AM, FRANZCO, chance—perhaps healing factors—that guided excimer laser ablation, there FRCOPHTH, FACS zero astigmatism would be achieved has been a trend toward focusing pri- on the cornea in this case. The higher marily on the corneal component of A concept in astigmatic treatment the nonzero amount (as quantified by astigmatism when planning treatment. that many refractive surgeons find the ORA), the worse the prospect of an Topography-modified refraction (TMR) hard to digest is the nonzero target. outcome that will please the patient. therefore often differs from clinical When laser treatment is guided wholly This unfortunate situation can be manifest refraction and involves using by refractive (manifest refraction or avoided in several ways. One of these is the corneal component of astigmatism wavefront refraction) or by corneal to identify the problem, if it exists, prior to plan refractive surgery. Kanellopoulos (topography-guided) parameters, sur- to performing surgery by quantifying has suggested that using the TMR may geons believe they are targeting zero, the patient’s ORA at the time of coun- provide superior outcomes in lines of but they are neglecting the other mode seling.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategizing the Return to Practice – Part 2 May 5, 2020 Presenting Sponsor Conversations About COVID-19 for Eye Care Professionals
    Conversations about COVID-19 For Eye Care Professionals Strategizing the Return to Practice – Part 2 May 5, 2020 Presenting sponsor Conversations about COVID-19 for Eye Care Professionals Jason Brenner, MD Matthew Forgues, OD Amy Moy, OD Cornea and Refractive President, Director, Health Surgeon Massachusetts Society of Center Network Boston Eye Group Optometrists New England College Boston Laser of Optometry Conversations about COVID-19 for Eye Care Professionals Speakers have no Financial Disclosures to Report Equipment – Safereyecare.org Disinfection – Masks 1. Time 2. Heat 3. UVGI 4. VHP 5. Microwave? www.n95decon.org How long does it last? Storage in cold temp (below 22 C) may prolong life Viral load dependent IMO, for eye clinic 7 day rotation is adequate Masks - Heat 1. 70 for 5 minutes (Lancet) 2. 70 at 50-85% RH for 30 minutes (CDC) ℃ *Moisture ℃seems to be key for adequate sterilization Masks - UVGI (NIAID) • 260-285 nm • ≥1.0J/cm • Very hard for UV to hit all surfaces • It is available! UVGI Equipment Sanitation Bleach Alcohol* UV GI (5 tbsp /gallon) Chlorhexidine Betadine Zeiss: 70% IPA for HFA Equipment Sanitation Office Sanitation $$$ Disinfection Art by: Stefanie Trilling Disinfection of Office (COVID-19) Current CDC recommendations specific to COVID-19 include: ● Diluted household bleach ○ 5 tablespoons bleach per gallon of water ● Alcohol solutions with at least 70% alcohol. ● Common EPA-registered household disinfectants currently recommended for use against SARS-CoV-2: ○ Clorox brand products (e.g., disinfecting wipes, multi-surface cleaner + bleach, clean up cleaner + bleach) ○ Lysol brand products (e.g., professional disinfectant spray, clean and fresh multi-surface cleaner, disinfectant max cover mist), ○ Purell professional surface disinfectant wipes and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Tips for Managing Myopia
    MYOPIA MANAGEMENT Practical tips for managing myopia Michael Morton This article presents a summary of Online Education Coordinator: practical approaches to diagnosing Brien Holden Vision myopia, myopia management Institute, Sydney, Australia. (with particular attention to low resource settings), reviewing myopia progression, and collecting data for myopia management programmes. Ling Lee Research Officer/ Optometrist: Part 1 Diagnosing and prescribing Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, for myopia Australia. While myopia might be initially detected by a patient EDGARDO CONTRERAS, COURTESY OF IAPB (e.g. reporting distance blur), or an adult observing Refraction is the first step. MEXICO behaviour changes in a child (e.g. squinting or • Monocular estimate method (MEM) retinoscopy. viewing things closer than expected), myopia is generally An objective method to determine a child’s diagnosed by an eye care professional. accommodative (near focussing) status at near. Priya Morjaria Equipment Retinoscopy should be conducted with a near target. Research Fellow: Accommodative facility. A subjective method to Department of The minimum required equipment to diagnose myopia • Clinical Research, and assess progression includes: assess accommodation function (ability of eye to London School focus at near). A high-contrast distance visual acuity (VA) chart (e.g., of Hygiene and • • Subjective phorias. A subjective method to Tropical Medicine, Snellen, logMAR, E, or LEA) determine whether the eyes prefer to converge in or International Centre • A room or space where the viewing distance for VA diverge out, at distance and near. for Eye Health, is at least 3m/10ft. The chart should be well lit and • Vergence reserves. A subjective method that London, UK. calibrated for the working distance measures the eyes’ ability to converge in and • Occluder (ideally with pinhole occluder) diverge out.
    [Show full text]
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Vision Rehabilitation Cases
    VISION REHABILITATION CASES CHUNG TO, OD CHRYSTYNA RAKOCZY, OD JAMES A HALEY VETERANS’ HOSPITAL T A M P A , F L CASE #1: PATIENT JS • 33 yo male active duty army soldier • 2012 – stateside fall accident during training • (-) no loss of consciousness • (+) altered consciousness x 24 hours • (+) post- traumatic amnesia x 24hrs CASE #1: PATIENT JS • Complaints since injury: • Intermittent, binocular, horizontal diplopia worse at near and when tired • Inability to read for longer than 10 min due to “eyes feeling tired“ • Chronic headaches with light sensitivity • Decreased memory • Dizziness CASE #1: PATIENT JS • Past Medical/Surgical History: • PRK OU x 2009 • C5-6 cervical fusion March 2013 • Medications: • ACETAMINOPHEN/OXYCODONE, ALBUTEROL, ALLOPURINOL, ATORVASTATIN, CETIRIZINE, DIAZEPAM, FISH OIL, FLUOXETINE, GABAPENTIN, HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE, LISINOPRIL, MINERALS/MULTIVITAMINS, MONTELUKAST SODIUM, NAPROXEN, OMEPRAZOLE , TESTOSTERONE CYPIONATE, ZOLPIDEM • Social History: • Married x 4yrs, 2 children • Denies tobacco/alcohol/illicit drug use • Family History: • Father: Diabetes: Glaucoma • Mother: Brain tumor glioblastoma CASE #1: PATIENT JS Sensory Examination Results Mental status Alert & orientated x 3 VA (distance, uncorrected) 20/15 OD, OS, OU VA (near, uncorrected) 20/20 OD, OS, OU Fixation Central, steady, accurate Color vision (Ishihara) 6/6 OD, OS Confrontation fields Full to finger counting OD, OS Stereopsis (uncorrected) Global: 200 sec of arc, Randot Local: 20 sec of arc, Wirt Worth 4 Dot Distance: ortho, no suppression Near:
    [Show full text]
  • Stereoacuity and Refractive, Accommodative and Vergence Anomalies of South African School Children, Aged 13–18 Years
    African Vision and Eye Health ISSN: (Online) 2410-1516, (Print) 2413-3183 Page 1 of 8 Original Research Stereoacuity and refractive, accommodative and vergence anomalies of South African school children, aged 13–18 years Authors: Aim: The aim of this study was to explore possible associations between stereoacuity and 1 Sam Otabor Wajuihian refractive, accommodative and vergence anomalies. Rekha Hansraj1 Methods: The study design was cross-sectional and comprised data from 1056 high school Affiliations: children aged between 13 and 18 years; mean age and standard deviation were 15.89 ± 1.58 1Discipline of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, years. Using a multi-stage random cluster sampling, participants were selected from 13 high South Africa schools out of a sample frame of 60 schools in the municipality concerned. In the final sample, 403 (38%) were males and 653 (62%) females. Refractive errors, heterophoria, near point of Corresponding author: Sam Wajuihian, convergence, fusional vergences and accommodative functions (amplitude, facility, response [email protected] and relative) were evaluated. Stereoacuity was evaluated using the Randot stereotest and recorded in seconds of arc where reduced stereoacuity was defined as worse than 40 s arc. Dates: Received: 03 May 2017 Results: Overall, the mean stereoacuities (in seconds of arc) of the children with anomalies Accepted: 08 Dec. 2017 were the following: those with refractive errors (52.6 ± 36.9), with accommodative anomalies Published: 19 Mar. 2018 (53.1 ± 34.1) and with vergence anomalies (48.29 ± 31.1). The mean stereoacuity of those with How to cite this article: vergence anomalies was significantly better than that of those with either refractive errors or Wajuihian SO, Hansraj R.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Ophthalmology
    introducing ophthalmology a p r i m e r for off ice st a f f Third Edition 655 Beach Street P.O. Box 7424 San Francisco, CA 94120-7424 introducing ophthalmology: a primer for office staff ophthalmology liaisons committee academy staff Samuel P. Solish, MD, Chair Richard A. Zorab, Vice President, Richard C. Allen, MD, PhD Ophthalmic Knowledge Amy S. Chomsky, MD Hal Straus, Director of Print Publications JoAnn A. Giaconi, MD Susan R. Keller, Acquisitions Editor Humeyra Karacal, MD Kimberly A. Torgerson, Publications Editor Martha P. Schatz, MD D. Jean Ray, Production Manager John Michael Williams Sr, MD Debra Marchi, CCOA, Administrative Assistant Kyle Arnoldi-Jolley, CO, COMT Annquinetta F. Dansby-Kelly, RN, CRNO Diana J. Shamis, COMT © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology All rights reserved. ii Preface iv contents 1 IntroductIon to oPhthalmology 1 2 d how oes the eye work? 7 3 d why o we need eyeglasses? 15 4 t wha can go wrong wIth the eye? 22 5 m the edIcal eye examInatIon 33 6 offIce etIquette and ethIcs 40 glossary 47 common oPhthalmIc abbrevIatIons 51 suggested resources 54 Chinese spectacles with tangerine skin case, ca 1780 (Courtesy Museum of Vision, Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology) iii preface This edition of Introducing Ophthalmology: A Primer for Office Staff has been reviewed for currency, updated, and converted to a digital format. The primary audience for this book is new office staff who need understanding of basic concepts in ophthalmology. New office staff will gain insights into the eye health terms and concepts they encounter.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Relative Accommodations in General Binocular Dysfunctions
    1040-5488/02/7912-0779/0 VOL. 79, NO. 12, PP. 779–787 OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE Copyright © 2002 American Academy of Optometry ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evaluating Relative Accommodations in General Binocular Dysfunctions ÁNGEL GARCÍA, DOO, PILAR CACHO, DOO, and FRANCISCO LARA, DOO Departamento Interuniversitario de Óptica, Universidad de Alicante, Spain (AG, PC), Departamento de Oftalmología, AP y ORL, Universidad de Murcia, Spain (FL) ABSTRACT: Purpose. To examine the relationship between relative accommodation and general binocular disorders and to establish their importance in the diagnosis of these anomalies. Methods. We analyzed data of negative relative accommodation (NRA) and positive relative accommodation (PRA) in 69 patients with nonstrabismic binocular anomalies. Results. Statistical analysis showed that low values of NRA and PRA were not associated with any particular disorder. High values of PRA (>3.50 D) were related to the disorders associated with accommodative excess, whereas high values of NRA (>2.50 D) were not related to accommodative excess. Statistical differences suggested that a high value of PRA could distinguish between anomalies. Sensitivity analysis revealed that high PRA was the most sensitive sign in patients with convergence insufficiency combined with accommodative excess (0.89) and one of the most sensitive signs for subjects with accommodative excess (0.72) and for those with convergence excess combined with accommodative excess (0.70). Conclusions. Anomalous results of NRA were not clearly associated with any dysfunc- tion. High values of PRA were related to disorders associated with accommodative excess, so the sign of a high value of PRA should be considered as one of the diagnostic signs of these anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Refraction Capabilities by H
    Remote Refraction New remote diagnostic technology allows refractions from anywhere Evolving Refraction Capabilities By H. Jay Wisnicki, MD ven before COVID was an issue, our New York City- Topcon RDx® and the CV-5000S based eye care practice of optometrists and ophthal- Digital Phoropter Benefits the Emologists had been doing an increasing amount of virtual work. This has been the case for many of us in eye- Patient and the Practice care; we have been outsourcing our billing operations, front Topcon RDx®, an ocular telehealth platform desk services, human resources, and a variety of administra- enables eye care providers to connect to their tive and clerical functions for many years. offices remotely and conduct portions of the At the same time, the introduction of electronic medical comprehensive eye exam. Topcon’s CV-5000S records (EMRs) has increased the level of medical device automated phoropter integrates with RDx integration and the exchange of clinical information across remotely, so practitioners can perform refractions the spectrum of eyecare. For example, image management from anywhere. software has made it possible for us to view fundus and OCT images, in addition to findings from corneal topogra- phy, biometry, ultrasound, and other digital devices be- tween our offices and networks. In the clinical realm, while medical specialties such as radiology, pathology and behavioral health have been con- ducting some form of telemedicine for years, other areas of medicine such as optometry and ophthalmology requiring a ter so practitioners can virtually perform refractions, view close-up view of the patient, have had a slower time making supplementary diagnostic information through Topcon’s the same leap.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing the Efficiency of Astigmatism Testing with the Topcon
    By Scott Fleming, OD Increasing the effi ciency of astigmatism testing with the Topcon CV-5000S J. Scott Fleming Optometrists, Torrace, CA he nature of astigmatism necessitates the and frustration that accompanies the traditional use of several tests to identify its presence Jackson cross cylinder test. Unlike the Jackson test, T and severity. While the corneal imaging which requires patients to compare sequential red techniques used in astigmatism assessment have and green framed-images, the Topcon simultane- undergone huge advancements in recent years, ous cross cylinder test presents the red and green- the determination of astigmatic refractive error framed images simultaneously in a split screen. As has remained at a stand-still. Indeed, the Jackson such, the optometrist can assess views of the front cross cylinder test has been the ‘go-to’ method and the rear of the Jackson cross cylinder at the for determining astigmatism-related refractive same time, rather than one after another. And as the errors for more than 100 years.1 However, like patient sees both images together, he or she is more many long-standing traditions, the test possesses confi dent that he or she has correctly identifi ed the some flaws. sharper image and the time wasted on going back to previous images to clarify the answer given by the The nature of the problem patient is avoided in totality. Patients and optometrists often report that the Jack- son cross cylinder test is unnecessarily complicated. Speed, accuracy and flexibility As the test relies on the classic question: “Which is The CV-5000S makes the measurement of cylin- better; one or two?” patients can struggle to remem- der power and axis faster and more accurate in ber the difference between successive images.
    [Show full text]