Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan Prepared by the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council March 2011 This Nonpoint Source Pollution Control project has been funded in part through the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #2006-0148 to the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council for the Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. The contents of the document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the EPA, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Recommended Citation: Kalamazoo River Watershed Council. 2011. Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan. Prepared for the Michigan Nonpoint Source Program (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and the United States Environmental Protection Agency). ii Acknowledgments This Watershed Management Plan is the culmination of several years of work on the part of the Kalamazoo River Watershed Council and particularly our Coordinator and the lead author of this report, Jeffrey A. Spoelstra. Jeff attended innumerable meetings in the community, studied dozens of reports, and assimilated and compiled the information presented here. The Plan was greatly enhanced by the technical and scientific support of Kieser & Associates, LLC, who contributed with spatial data analysis, map production, and modeling. We would also like to acknowledge our many partners in the quest to improve watershed protection and management in the Kalamazoo River watershed. Funding to prepare this Plan was provided primarily through a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 319 grant administered by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ; also known as MDNRE during the report preparation). Janelle Hohm and Julia Kirkwood of the MDEQ were especially helpful in providing guidance and support. Our work on non-point source pollution has been conducted in close collaboration with the Kalamazoo River/Lake Allegan Total Maximum Daily Load implementation committee, and we received input from many other governmental and non-governmental entities. Stephen K. Hamilton, PhD President Kalamazoo River Watershed Council iii Table of Contents 1. Introduction _________________________________________________________ 1 1.1. The Challenge of Watershed Management ________________________________ 4 1.2. The Purpose of this Plan _______________________________________________ 5 1.3. Guiding Principles ____________________________________________________ 6 1.4. Structure and Use of this Plan __________________________________________ 7 2. Watershed Description ______________________________________________ 11 2.1. Geology and Groundwater ____________________________________________ 11 2.2. Hydrology: Ground and Surface Waters ________________________________ 16 2.3. Land Use and Cover _________________________________________________ 20 2.4. The Kalamazoo River Mainstem _______________________________________ 26 2.5. Dams and Reservoirs ________________________________________________ 27 3. Community Profile _________________________________________________ 30 3.1. Synopsis of Regional History __________________________________________ 30 3.2. Governmental and Political Structure __________________________________ 32 3.3. Urban and Suburban Centers and Industrial Activity _____________________ 37 3.4. Agriculture _________________________________________________________ 38 3.5. Demographics, Future Growth and Development _________________________ 38 3.6. Outdoor Recreation _________________________________________________ 39 4. Natural Features and their Protection _________________________________ 41 4.1. Terrestrial Ecosystems _______________________________________________ 43 4.2. Streams and Rivers __________________________________________________ 44 4.3. Lakes _____________________________________________________________ 46 4.4. Wetlands and Floodplains ____________________________________________ 47 4.5. Rare Features and Species ____________________________________________ 51 4.6. Invasive Species (aquatic and wetland) __________________________________ 52 5. The Legacy of Contaminated Sediments ________________________________ 53 5.1. PCBs in the River System and Food Webs _______________________________ 53 5.2. Superfund _________________________________________________________ 55 5.3. Area of Concern ____________________________________________________ 58 5.4. Overlapping Superfund and AOC Issues ________________________________ 60 5.5. Other Trace Contaminants ___________________________________________ 60 6. Water Resource Management ________________________________________ 62 iv 6.1. Watershed Management: Setting Boundaries ____________________________ 62 6.2. Land Use and Water Quality __________________________________________ 62 6.3. Regulatory Authority for Water Resources ______________________________ 63 6.4. Roads and Water Quality _____________________________________________ 70 6.5. Water Bodies (rivers, drains, streams, lakes) _____________________________ 72 6.6. Local Water Quality Protection Policies _________________________________ 73 6.7. Private Land Management ____________________________________________ 75 7. Water Quality Summary ____________________________________________ 79 7.1. Designated and Desired Uses __________________________________________ 79 7.2. Water Quality: General Considerations _________________________________ 90 7.3. Groundwater Quantity and Quality ____________________________________ 92 7.4. Loading to Lake Michigan ____________________________________________ 95 8. Development of the Kalamazoo River Watershed Management Plan _________ 96 8.1. Public Input and Stakeholder Concerns _________________________________ 96 8.2. Water Quality Evaluation: Linking Pollutant Loads to Water Quality _______ 97 9. Prioritization - Areas, Pollutants, Sources _____________________________ 113 9.1. Urban/Suburban Mitigation Areas ____________________________________ 120 9.2. Rural/Agricultural Mitigation Areas __________________________________ 121 9.3. Ecosystem Restoration Areas to Ameliorate Non-Point Source Pollution _____ 123 9.4. High-Quality Aquatic Ecosystems Preservation Areas ____________________ 124 10. Goals and Objectives ____________________________________________ 126 10.1. Goals for Designated Uses ___________________________________________ 126 10.2. Goals for Desired Uses ______________________________________________ 131 11. Implementation Strategies ________________________________________ 135 11.1. Action Plan by Priority Area _________________________________________ 135 11.2. Information and Education __________________________________________ 145 12. Moving from Plan to Action and Results ____________________________ 154 12.1. Knowledge and Awareness ___________________________________________ 154 12.2. Documenting Implementation ________________________________________ 154 12.3. Monitoring Water Quality ___________________________________________ 154 12.4. Estimating Pollutant Load Reductions _________________________________ 161 12.5. Evaluating the Watershed Management Plan ___________________________ 163 13. References cited ___________________________________________________ 164 v Attachments: Attachment 1. Partnership Agreement Attachment 2. Crosswalk Table of Subwatersheds as Defined by Project, Agency, and Management Unit Attachment 3. Build-Out Analysis and Urban Cost Scenarios Attachment 4. Road Stream Crossing Data for the Kalamazoo River Watershed Streambank Erosion Sites Attachment 5. Common Pollutants, Sources and Water Quality Standards Attachment 6. Individual Waterbody Assessment Attachment 7. Buffer Analysis Memo Attachment 8. Kalamazoo River BMP Screening Tool Attachment 9. BMP Descriptions, Costs, and Load Reductions per Area Treated Attachment 10. Public Comment Attachment 11. Impaired Waterbodies Attachment 12. Watershed and TMDL Phosphorus Load Reduction Goal Calculations vi Tables Table 1. Kalamazoo River subwatershed plans. ______________________________________________ 9 Table 2 . Soils within the Kalamazoo River Watershed (from the STATSGO data base). ______________ 13 Table 3. Land use breakdown for the entire Kalamazoo River Watershed based on the data in Figure 9. _ 22 Table 4. Land use breakdown for each major watershed management planning area (see Table 1) in the Kalamazoo River Watershed (percentage of subwatershed area). _______________________________ 23 Table 5. Land use breakdown for areas without a WMP in the Kalamazoo River Watershed (percentage of subwatershed area) . __________________________________________________________________ 24 Table 6. Political boundaries within the Kalamazoo River Watershed. ___________________________ 32 Table 7. Major Streams in the Kalamazoo River Watershed. ___________________________________ 45 Table 8. Major lakes in the Kalamazoo River Watershed. _____________________________________ 47 Table 9. Total area (in acres) of potential wetland restoration areas based on restoration rank for all major subwatersheds, where rank 1 is highest priority. ____________________________________________ 48 Table 10. Number, and average size, of wetlands area per restoration rank. _______________________ 50 Table 11. Private Land Protection Options. _______________________________________________ 76 Table 12. Private Land Management Programs.**___________________________________________ 77 Table 13. Designated use definitions. _____________________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Kalamazoo River Assessment
    ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A S STATE OF MICHIGAN P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 35 September 2005 Kalamazoo River Assessment Jay K. Wesley www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Special Report 35 September 2005 Kalamazoo River Assessment Jay K. Wesley MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write: HUMAN RESOURCES Or MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Or OFFICE FOR DIVERSITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CADILLAC PLACE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PO BOX 30028 3054 W.
    [Show full text]
  • CRYSTAL RADIO GROUP, INC., a Michigan Corporation, EDWARD J
    rRWIN, 1320 ErGHTEENT.H:~ -. sUIn'"'ill ,' WASHrNGTONDC2:0036 PHONE (202)'.728 -.10400 .' .~ Invoice submitted to: 'Invoice #11039 Federated Media P.O. Box 2500 Elkhart IN 46515-2500 c/o Mr. Robert Watson October 6, 1993 In reference to: WRBR-FM, Elkhard, IN -#30450 For Legal Services Rendered From September 1 to September 30, 1993 Hrs/Rate Amount Total Hours and Amount .. "- 09/07/93 ACC Review pledge and security 1.00 lS0.00 agreements, ~ lS0.00/hr '. \ '. 09/0S/9,3 ACC conference call re pledge and 0.60 10S.00 security agreements 180.00/hr 09/15/93 ACC Conference call B. Watson and 2.30 414.00 review revised draft agreements 180.00/hr 09/2S/93 ACC Review security and piedge 1.20 216.00 revisions; call B. Watson re same 180.00/hr 5.10 $918.00 ) HICKS000374 MILLER, ADPQCK AND STONE, P.L.C• .... 1\ P:rb'feS!:f£~~ .~$J.1\\D!i1ab1.ditycompany',·."~:.f~. 150 West'.fferson, Suite 2500 Det:roit~' Michigan 48226 (313) 963-6420 OUr Taxpayer' l •.p. No. 38-0836500 ***Attorney-Client/Attorney Work Product Privileged***. April 29, 1994 Invoice #289505 **Please reference this invoice nUIDber when remitting payment.** Hicks, David L. - personal 4154 Jennings Drive Kalamazoo, MI 49005 PLEASE REMIT PAYMENT TO: P. O. Drawer 64348 Detroit, MI 48264-0348 For professional services rendered through March 31, 1994 in connection with the following - Re: Radio Station WRBR (FM) Client/Matter #040363/00002 Bi~ling Attorney: EV Brown Jr Including Fees For -- 09/06/93 Office conference with Mr. Hicks; telep~~e I' ~ conference with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Eeo Public File Report
    EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT Townsquare License, LLC Southwest Michigan Employment Unit WRKR(FM), WKFR-FM, WKMI(AM), WBCK(FM), WBXX(FM) EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT June 1, 2020-May 31, 2021 Section 1. Vacancy List See Section II, the “Master Recruitment Source List” (“MRSL”) for recruitment source data Recruitment Sources (“RS”) Job Title RS Referring Hire Used to Fill Vacancy WKFR Morning Show Co-host 8, 12, 13, 19, 20, 22, 29 29 Account Executive 19, 20, 22, 30 ,31 20 Account Executive 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 22 14 Director of Content 18 18 EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT WRKR(FM), WKFR-FM, WKMI(AM), WBCK(FM), WBXX(FM) EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT June 1, 2020-May 31, 2021 Section 2. Recruitment Source List Source Entitled No. of Interviewees RS Referred by RS RS Information to Vacancy Number Notification? Over (Yes/No) Reporting Period 1 Kalamazoo Gazette N 0 www.mlive.com 401 S Burdick Kalamazoo, MI 49007 269-345-3511 [email protected] 2 Western Michigan University N 0 Career & Student Services Brenda Case-Parris 1903 W Michigan Avenue Handshake.com – Job Posting Site 3 Central Michigan University N 0 Career Services 340 Moore Hall Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 989-774-4000 [email protected] 4 Kalamazoo Valley Community College N 0 Lois Brinson 6767 West O Avenue PO Box 4070 Kalamazoo, MI 49003-4070 269-488-4272 [email protected] 5 Traffic Directors Guild N 0 26000 Avenida Aeropuerto Bldg 114 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Larry Keene [email protected] 6 Michigan Association of Broadcasters N 0 819 N Washington Avenue Lansing, MI 48906 517-484-7444 [email protected] http://www.mitalent.org/ 2 Source Entitled No.
    [Show full text]
  • Stations Coverage Map Broadcasters
    820 N. Capitol Ave., Lansing, MI 48906 PH: (517) 484-7444 | FAX: (517) 484-5810 Public Education Partnership (PEP) Program Station Lists/Coverage Maps Commercial TV I DMA Call Letters Channel DMA Call Letters Channel Alpena WBKB-DT2 11.2 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOOD-TV 7 Alpena WBKB-DT3 11.3 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOTV-TV 20 Alpena WBKB-TV 11 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WXSP-DT2 15.2 Detroit WKBD-TV 14 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WXSP-TV 15 Detroit WWJ-TV 44 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WXMI-TV 19 Detroit WMYD-TV 21 Lansing WLNS-TV 36 Detroit WXYZ-DT2 41.2 Lansing WLAJ-DT2 25.2 Detroit WXYZ-TV 41 Lansing WLAJ-TV 25 Flint-Saginaw-Bay City WJRT-DT2 12.2 Marquette WLUC-DT2 35.2 Flint-Saginaw-Bay City WJRT-DT3 12.3 Marquette WLUC-TV 35 Flint-Saginaw-Bay City WJRT-TV 12 Marquette WBUP-TV 10 Flint-Saginaw-Bay City WBSF-DT2 46.2 Marquette WBKP-TV 5 Flint-Saginaw-Bay City WEYI-TV 30 Traverse City-Cadillac WFQX-TV 32 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOBC-CA 14 Traverse City-Cadillac WFUP-DT2 45.2 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOGC-CA 25 Traverse City-Cadillac WFUP-TV 45 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOHO-CA 33 Traverse City-Cadillac WWTV-DT2 9.2 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOKZ-CA 50 Traverse City-Cadillac WWTV-TV 9 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOLP-CA 41 Traverse City-Cadillac WWUP-DT2 10.2 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOMS-CA 29 Traverse City-Cadillac WWUP-TV 10 GR-Kzoo-Battle Creek WOOD-DT2 7.2 Traverse City-Cadillac WMNN-LD 14 Commercial TV II DMA Call Letters Channel DMA Call Letters Channel Detroit WJBK-TV 7 Lansing WSYM-TV 38 Detroit WDIV-TV 45 Lansing WILX-TV 10 Detroit WADL-TV 39 Marquette WJMN-TV 48 Flint-Saginaw-Bay
    [Show full text]
  • Kalamazoo River Draft Supplemental Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment
    Kalamazoo River Draft Supplemental Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan Department of Attorney General April 2021 Regulatory Notes An Environmental Assessment is prepared to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The NEPA is the Nation’s premier environmental law that guarantees every American the right to review, comment, and participate in planning of federal decisions that may affect the human environment. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) on July 16, 2020 issued in the Federal Register a final rule updating its regulations for the NEPA (85 Fed. Reg. 43304, July 16, 2020). On January 20, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden issued an Executive Order entitled “Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis” that requires agencies to immediately review promulgation of Federal regulations and other actions during the previous four years to determine consistency with Section 1 of the Executive Order. This may include the CEQ reviewing the July 16, 2020 update to the NEPA regulations. The goals of the July 2020 amendments to the NEPA regulations were to reduce paperwork and delays and to promote better decisions consistent with the policy set forth in section 101 of the NEPA. The effective date of these amended regulations was September 14, 2020. However, for actions that began before September 14th, such as this one, agencies may continue with the regulations in effect before September 14th because applying the amended regulations would cause delays to the ongoing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalamazoo River Oil Spill Restoration
    U.S Fish & Wildlife Service NATURAL RESOURCE TRUSTEES Kalamazoo River Oil Spill Restoration Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Fish passage project in tributary of the Kalamazoo River Band of the Pottawatomi Tribe first project implemented from oil spill restoration plan National Oceanic and On July 25, 2010, Enbridge’s Lakehead Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration Line 6B, a 30-inch diameter pipeline, and Atmospheric Administration, Match ruptured near Marshall, Michigan, and -E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of the Pot- discharged crude oil into a wetland adja- tawatomi Tribe, and the Nottawaseppi cent to Talmadge Creek in Calhoun Huron Band of the Potawatomi Tribe. County, Michigan. The oil flowed down The Trustees completed the Damage Talmadge Creek and into the Kalamazoo Assessment and Restoration Plan in Oc- River which was in floodstage at the tober, 2015. The Natural Resource Trus- State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources time (Figure 1). Oil flowed down the tees recently announced the completion Kalamazoo River and through the river of a fish passage project on Pigeon floodplain for approximately 38 miles to Creek, a tributary of the Kalamazoo Riv- Morrow Lake. Numerous species of er, in Calhoun County, Michigan. wildlife and their habitats, and their re- State of Michigan Department of Environmental Quality lated services, were injured as a result of this spill which remains the Nation’s largest inland oil spill. State of Michigan Department of the Attorney General Figure 2. The culvert system at E Drive on Pigeon Creek, a tributary of the Kalamazoo River, prior to restoration of fish passage.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan (Lamp) 2006
    TC-1 Lake Michigan LaMP 2006 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................i-1 What is the Status of the Lake?.........................................................................................................i-1 Background on the LaMP……………………………………………… ...............................................i-2 Linking LaMP Goals to RAPs…………………………………………....................................................i-2 Remedial Action Plans…………………………………………...............................................i-2 LaMP 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006: How and by whom are they used? .....................................i-3 What Was Accomplished and What Challenges Remain? .........................................................i-3 Areas of LaMP Work that Remain a Challenge………………………............................................i-3 A Focus on the Future: Sustainability and Stewardship……………… ..........................................i-4 A Focus on Ecosystems and Watersheds………………………………............................................i-4 A Focus on Partnerships and Innovation and Shared Information……………………………….i-5 LaMP 2006 Data and Information……………………………………….............................................i-5 Great Lakes Regional Collaboration ...............................................................................................i-6 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement...........................................................................................i-6
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Media List for STIP Press Release
    2008-2011 State Transportation Improvement Program Page 64 Appendix G Media Outlets (Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of contacts within the media outlet that received the press release.) AAA Michigan (3) CITO-TV Albion Recorder City Pulse Alcona County Review Clare County Review Alegria Latina CMU Public Broadcasting Network Allegan County News (2) Coldwater Reporter Allegan County News/Union Enterprise Commercial Express-Vicksburg Alma Latina Radio Connection, The Ann Arbor News (4) Courier-Leader-Paw-Paw Antrim County News Crain's Detroit Business Arab American News Crawford County Avalanche Argus-Press Daily Globe Associated Press (2) Daily Press Bailey, John Daily Reporter Battle Creek Enquirer (4) Daily Telegram (2) Bay City Times (2) Daily Tribune (2) Beattie, Dan Detroit Free Press (3) Benzie County Record Patriot Detroit News (4) Berrien County Record Dowagiac Daily News Berrien Springs Journal-Era Ecorse Telegram Blade El Tiempo Boers, Dan El Vocero Hispano Bowman, Joan Elkhart Truth (6) Building Tradesman Evening News Bureau of National Affairs Flint Journal Burton News Fordyce, Jim Business Direct Weekly Fox 47 C & G Newspapers Frankenmuth News Cadillac News Fremont Times-Indicator Caribe Serenade Gladwin County Record & Beaverton Clarion Carson City Gazette Gongwer News Service Cass City Chronicle Grand Haven Tribune Cassopolis Vigilant/Edwardsburg Argus Grand Rapids Business Journal (3) Catholic Connector Grand Rapids Press (8) Charlevoix Courier Graphic CHAS-FM Hamtramck Citizen Cheboygan Daily Tribune Harbor Beach
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Over Troubled Water the Enbridge Gxl System’S Threat to the Great Lakes
    ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES WRITING TEAM: KENNY BRUNO, CATHY COLLENTINE, DOUG HAYES, JIM MURPHY, PAUL BLACKBURN, ANDY PEARSON, ANTHONY SWIFT, WINONA LADUKE, ELIZABETH WARD, CARL WHITING PHOTO CREDIT: SEAWIFS PROJECT, NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, AND ORBIMAGE ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes A B ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER The Enbridge GXL System’s Threat to the Great Lakes ENBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER THE ENBRIDGE GXL SYSTEM’S THREAT TO THE GREAT LAKES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE . 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 DOUBLE CROSS — ­ENBRIDGE’S SCHEME TO EXPAND TRANSBORDER TAR SANDS OIL FLOW WITHOUT PUBLIC OVERSIGHT . 6 CASE STUDY IN SEGMENTATION: FLANAGAN SOUTH . 8 THREAT TO THE HEARTLAND: WISCONSIN THE TAR SANDS ARTERY . 9 ENBRIDGE’S “KEYSTONE KOPS” FOUL THE KALAMAZOO . 11 TAR SANDS INVASION OF THE EAST . 1 3 “THE WORST POSSIBLE PLACE” — LINE 5 AND THE STRAITS OF MACKINAC . 1 4 OF WILD RICE AND FRACKED OIL — THE SANDPIPER PIPELINE . 18 ABANDONMENT: ENBRIDGE LINE 3 MACHINATIONS . 21 NORTHERN GATEWAY . 23 CONCLUSIONS . 24 TAR SANDS MINING IN ALBERTA CANADA. PHOTO CREDIT: NIKO TAVERNISE PREFACE If you drive a car in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois or Michigan, chances are there’s tar sands in your tank. That fuel probably comes to you courtesy of Canada’s largest pipeline company, Enbridge. This report tells the story of that company and its system of oil pipelines in the Great Lakes region. TAR SANDS OIL refers to a class of crude oils that Before there was Keystone, there was the Lakehead System.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Lamp 2000 Chapters Into a Comprehensive Document Is Summarized in Table ES-1 at the End of This Executive Summary
    Lake Michigan LaMP CONTENTS Section Page Acknowledgements Preface.......................................................................... P-1 Executive Summary............................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1 Lake Michigan LaMP Overview: Program Structure, Scope,cale, and Public Involvement 1.1 About This Chapter .......................................................... 1-1 1.2 About the LaMP – Why ...................................................... 1-1 1.3 About the LaMP – Who ...................................................... 1-2 1.4 About the LaMP – Program Structure ........................................... 1-2 1.4.1 Management Committee ............................................... 1-2 1.4.2 The Technical Coordinating Committees .................................. 1-3 1.4.3 The Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council ........................ 1-3 1.4.4 The Lake Michigan Forum ............................................. 1-3 1.5 About the LaMP- How ....................................................... 1-4 1.5.1 The Document and Reporting ........................................... 1-4 1.5.2 Science and Models: The Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project ................ 1-4 1.6 About the LaMP – Scope ..................................................... 1-5 1.7 About the LaMP – Where ..................................................... 1-6 1.8 The LaMP Document – Organization............................................ 1-9 1.9 The LaMP Document – Public Involvement ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inside: Kalamazoo, 19-21 January 2012 Annual Early Registration Due 19 Dec
    Volume 15, No. 4 SERVING MICHIGAN'S COACHES December 2011 40th MHSFCA Winners Circle Clinic Inside: Kalamazoo, 19-21 January 2012 Annual Early Registration Due 19 Dec. See page 6 Important Dates .............................2 Schedule page 5 Notes ..............................................3 Recruiting Fairs Gain Popularity Women of the Year .........................3 Operation Michigan Guard ...........3 Newsletter Delivery .......................3 All Star Selection Meetings ...........3 Board of Directors Election ............4 Kalamazoo Clinic Schedule ............5 Kalamazoo Registration .................6 Nike Mt Pleasant Clinic ................7 Glazier Clinics ...............................8 Assistant Coach Awards ..............10 Spicer Awards ..............................10 Honorary Awards ........................10 MHSCA Hall of Fame .................10 Leadership Conference .................11 Above Taylor Kennedy coach, Brian Obrycki discusses prospects with Hope College coach, Mike Ricketts. MHSFCA on the Web ..................13 The recruiting fairs save college coaches time and money and allow high school Regional Coaches of the Year .......14 coaches to do their job, promoting their athletes, much more efficiently to colleges including schools that they and their athletes may otherwise not have considered. This Academic All State Teams............15 was the biggest year yet for attendance as more and more Michigan coaches realize the Academic All State Individuals ...16 advantages they offer. State Coaches of the
    [Show full text]
  • Gun River Watershed Management Plan
    Gun River Watershed Management Plan Prepared for Allegan Conservation District by February 2004 GUN RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN MDEQ TRACKING CODE: #2000-0164 FEBRUARY 2004 PROJECT NO. G01339 This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement (C9975474-01) to Allegan Conservation District, 2000-0164. The contents of the document do not necessary reflect the views and policies of the Environment Protection Agency, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, INC. Engineers Scientists Architects 1515 Arboretum Drive, SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Telephone: 616-575-3824 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 - WATERSHED DESCRIPTION........................................................................................5 1.0 Overview ....................................................................................................................................5 1.1 Geographic Scope .....................................................................................................................5 1.2 Topography................................................................................................................................5 1.3 Soils ...........................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]