The Influence of Genetic Variation in Gene Expression

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Influence of Genetic Variation in Gene Expression The Influence of Genetic Variation in Gene Expression Eva King-Fan Chan A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2007 School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences University of New South Wales Certificate of originality I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged. ______________________ Eva Chan 18th July 2007 i Abstract Abstract Variations in gene expression have long been hypothesised to be the major cause of individual differences. An initial focus of this research thesis is to elucidate the genetic regulatory architecture of gene expression. Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping analyses have been performed on expression levels of over 22,000 mRNAs from three tissues of a panel of recombinant inbred mice. These analyses are “single-locus” where “linkage” (i.e. significant correlation) between an expression trait and a putative eQTL is considered independently of other loci. Major conclusions from these analyses are: 1. Gene expression is mainly influenced by genetic (sequence) variations that act in trans rather than in cis; 2. Subsets of genes are controlled by master regulators that influence multiple genes; 3. Gene expression is a polygenic trait with multiple regulators. Single-locus mapping analyses are not designed for detecting multiple regulators of gene expression, and so observation of multiple-linkages (i.e. one expression trait mapped to multiple eQTLs) formed the basis of the second objective of this research project: to investigate the relationship between multiple-linkages and genotype pattern-association. A locus-pair is said to have associated genotype patterns if they have similar inheritance pattern across a panel of individuals, and these are attributed to one of fours sources: 1. linkage disequilibrium between loci located on the same chromosome; 2. non-syntenic association; 3. random association; 4. un-associated. ii Abstract To understand the validity of multiple-linkages observed in single-locus mapping studies, a newly developed method, bqtl.twolocus, is applied to confirm two-locus effects for a total of 898 out of 1,233 multiple-linkages identified from the three studies mentioned above as well as from seven publicly available eQTL-mapping studies. Combining these results with information of genotype pattern-association, a subset of 478 multiple- linkages has been deduced for which there is high confidence to be real. iii Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Three-and-a-half years and it is now over. It had been intellectually challenging, stressful at times (most of the time), frustrating (still can’t believe I have not yet thrown anything at the computer despite my many threats to do so), but all-in-all it had been a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Needless to say, the person I would like to thank most is my supervisor, Peter Little, from whom I learnt the true meaning of “research”. Peter is an exceptional mentor and I am truly grateful for his guidance and the privilege to share in his passion. Three very special people I would very much like to acknowledge are Rohan Williams, Mark Cowley, and Chris Cotsapas, with whom I have shared the lab over the pass several years. It is near impossible to count all that I have learnt from Rohan and I’d like to thank him for his advices, encouragements, and friendship. Many thanks to Mark for being my IT guru and for showing me scientists need not be overly eccentric (and that it is okay to listen to pop). Thanks also to Chris for his endless efforts to stimulate the unwary mind with everything and anything. Much appreciation to David Nott, our resident Statistician, who has on so many occasions helped simplify a complicated problem to an elegant Bayesian model. Acknowledgements also to many students that have contributed directly or indirectly to my work: Jeremy Pulvers, Michael Liu, Oscar Luo, and Andrew Liu. Thanks to my internal reviewers Ian Dawes and Andrew Brown. iv Publications Publications Published papers Rohan B H Williams, Chris J Cotsapas, Mark J Cowley, Eva Chan, David J Nott, Peter F R Little. 2006 Normalization procedures and detection of linkage signal in genetical-genomics experiments. Nature Genetics 38: 855- 856. Chris J. Cotsapas, Rohan B.H. Williams, Jeremy N. Pulvers, David J. Nott, Eva K.F. Chan, Mark J. 2006 Genetic dissection of gene regulation in multiple mouse tissues. Mammalian Genome 17 (6): 490-495. David J. Nott, Zeming Yua, Eva Chan, Chris Cotsapas, Mark Cowley, Jeremy Pulvers, Rohan Williams and Peter Little. Hierarchical Bayes variable selection and microarray experiments. Journal of Multivariate Analysis (accepted) Papers in preparation Eva KF Chan, Mark J Cowley, Rohan BH Williams, Chris J Cotsapas, David J Nott, Peter FR Little. 2006 Multiple linkages in eQTL studies of mice, rats, and yeast. (in preparation) Rohan BH Williams, Eva KF Chan, Mark J Cowley, Peter FR Little. The influence of genetic variation on gene expression. Genome Research (invited review). Mark J Cowley, Chris J Cotsapas, Rohan BH Williams, Eva KF Chan, Jeremy N Pulvers, Michael Y Liu, David J Nott, Peter FR Little. The effects of genetic variation on gene expression in multiple tissues. (submitted) Refereed Published Conference Proceedings Cotsapas C, Chan E, Kirk M, Tanaka M, Little P. 2003 Genetic variation and the control of transcription IN Cold Spring Harbour Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Symposium 68, pp. 109-114. v Table of Contents Table of Contents Certificate of originality ........................................................................................................ i Abstract ................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. iv Publications .......................................................................................................................... v Published papers .............................................................................................................. v Papers in preparation ....................................................................................................... v Refereed Published Conference Proceedings .................................................................. v Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ vi Table of Figures................................................................................................................... ix Table of Tables.................................................................................................................. xiii 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................1 1.1. Natural variation................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Gene expression regulatory variation ................................................................ 3 1.2.1. Cis-acting regulatory elements................................................................. 4 1.2.2. Trans-acting regulatory factors................................................................ 5 1.3. Mapping expression quantitative trait loci ........................................................ 8 1.3.1. eQTL mapping approaches ...................................................................... 8 1.3.2. Segregating populations......................................................................... 10 1.4. Microarrays and expression traits.................................................................... 13 1.4.1. Normalisation of expression data........................................................... 16 1.5. Marker genotype patterns................................................................................ 18 1.6. Single-locus mapping ...................................................................................... 21 1.6.1. Significance test and multiple testing .................................................... 23 1.7. Multi-locus mapping ....................................................................................... 27 1.8. Aim and hypotheses ........................................................................................ 34 1.8.1. Influence of genetic variation on mRNA levels (Chapter 3).................. 34 1.8.2. Multi-locus influence of gene expression variation (Chapter 4)............ 34 1.8.3. Influence of genotype pattern association in multiple linkage (Chapter 5) ............................................................................................. 35 2. Materials and Methods.............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Association Analyses of Known Genetic Variants with Gene
    ASSOCIATION ANALYSES OF KNOWN GENETIC VARIANTS WITH GENE EXPRESSION IN BRAIN by Viktoriya Strumba A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Bioinformatics) in The University of Michigan 2009 Doctoral Committee: Professor Margit Burmeister, Chair Professor Huda Akil Professor Brian D. Athey Assistant Professor Zhaohui S. Qin Research Statistician Thomas Blackwell To Sam and Valentina Dmitriy and Elizabeth ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Professor Margit Burmeister, who tirelessly guided me though seemingly impassable corridors of graduate work. Throughout my thesis writing period she provided sound advice, encouragement and inspiration. Leading by example, her enthusiasm and dedication have been instrumental in my path to becoming a better scientist. I also would like to thank my co-advisor Tom Blackwell. His careful prodding always kept me on my toes and looking for answers, which taught me the depth of careful statistical analysis. His diligence and dedication have been irreplaceable in most difficult of projects. I also would like to thank my other committee members: Huda Akil, Brian Athey and Steve Qin as well as David States. You did not make it easy for me, but I thank you for believing and not giving up. Huda’s eloquence in every subject matter she explained have been particularly inspiring, while both Huda’s and Brian’s valuable advice made the completion of this dissertation possible. I would also like to thank all the members of the Burmeister lab, both past and present: Sandra Villafuerte, Kristine Ito, Cindy Schoen, Karen Majczenko, Ellen Schmidt, Randi Burns, Gang Su, Nan Xiang and Ana Progovac.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo 2010/075007 A2
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 1 July 2010 (01.07.2010) WO 2010/075007 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) G06F 19/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C12N 15/12 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (21) International Application Number: DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US2009/067757 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 11 December 2009 ( 11.12.2009) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (25) Filing Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, (26) Publication Language: English TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 12/3 16,877 16 December 2008 (16.12.2008) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): DODDS, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, W., Jean [US/US]; 938 Stanford Street, Santa Monica, TM), European (AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, CA 90403 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing-Associated Changes in DNA Methylation in X and Y Chromosomes
    Kananen and Marttila Epigenetics & Chromatin (2021) 14:33 Epigenetics & Chromatin https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-021-00407-6 RESEARCH Open Access Ageing-associated changes in DNA methylation in X and Y chromosomes Laura Kananen1,2,3,4* and Saara Marttila4,5* Abstract Background: Ageing displays clear sexual dimorphism, evident in both morbidity and mortality. Ageing is also asso- ciated with changes in DNA methylation, but very little focus has been on the sex chromosomes, potential biological contributors to the observed sexual dimorphism. Here, we sought to identify DNA methylation changes associated with ageing in the Y and X chromosomes, by utilizing datasets available in data repositories, comprising in total of 1240 males and 1191 females, aged 14–92 years. Results: In total, we identifed 46 age-associated CpG sites in the male Y, 1327 age-associated CpG sites in the male X, and 325 age-associated CpG sites in the female X. The X chromosomal age-associated CpGs showed signifcant overlap between females and males, with 122 CpGs identifed as age-associated in both sexes. Age-associated X chro- mosomal CpGs in both sexes were enriched in CpG islands and depleted from gene bodies and showed no strong trend towards hypermethylation nor hypomethylation. In contrast, the Y chromosomal age-associated CpGs were enriched in gene bodies, and showed a clear trend towards hypermethylation with age. Conclusions: Signifcant overlap in X chromosomal age-associated CpGs identifed in males and females and their shared features suggest that despite the uneven chromosomal dosage, diferences in ageing-associated DNA methylation changes in the X chromosome are unlikely to be a major contributor of sex dimorphism in ageing.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Candidate Genes for Stallion Fertility from the Horse Y Chromosome
    DISCOVERY OF CANDIDATE GENES FOR STALLION FERTILITY FROM THE HORSE Y CHROMOSOME A Dissertation by NANDINA PARIA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2009 Major Subject: Biomedical Sciences DISCOVERY OF CANDIDATE GENES FOR STALLION FERTILITY FROM THE HORSE Y CHROMOSOME A Dissertation by NANDINA PARIA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Terje Raudsepp Committee Members, Bhanu P. Chowdhary William J. Murphy Paul B. Samollow Dickson D. Varner Head of Department, Evelyn Tiffany-Castiglioni August 2009 Major Subject: Biomedical Sciences iii ABSTRACT Discovery of Candidate Genes for Stallion Fertility from the Horse Y Chromosome. (August 2009) Nandina Paria, B.S., University of Calcutta; M.S., University of Calcutta Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Terje Raudsepp The genetic component of mammalian male fertility is complex and involves thousands of genes. The majority of these genes are distributed on autosomes and the X chromosome, while a small number are located on the Y chromosome. Human and mouse studies demonstrate that the most critical Y-linked male fertility genes are present in multiple copies, show testis-specific expression and are different between species. In the equine industry, where stallions are selected according to pedigrees and athletic abilities but not for reproductive performance, reduced fertility of many breeding stallions is a recognized problem. Therefore, the aim of the present research was to acquire comprehensive information about the organization of the horse Y chromosome (ECAY), identify Y-linked genes and investigate potential candidate genes regulating stallion fertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Information
    Supplemental information Dissection of the genomic structure of the miR-183/96/182 gene. Previously, we showed that the miR-183/96/182 cluster is an intergenic miRNA cluster, located in a ~60-kb interval between the genes encoding nuclear respiratory factor-1 (Nrf1) and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2H (Ube2h) on mouse chr6qA3.3 (1). To start to uncover the genomic structure of the miR- 183/96/182 gene, we first studied genomic features around miR-183/96/182 in the UCSC genome browser (http://genome.UCSC.edu/), and identified two CpG islands 3.4-6.5 kb 5’ of pre-miR-183, the most 5’ miRNA of the cluster (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1 and Seq. S1). A cDNA clone, AK044220, located at 3.2-4.6 kb 5’ to pre-miR-183, encompasses the second CpG island (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1). We hypothesized that this cDNA clone was derived from 5’ exon(s) of the primary transcript of the miR-183/96/182 gene, as CpG islands are often associated with promoters (2). Supporting this hypothesis, multiple expressed sequences detected by gene-trap clones, including clone D016D06 (3, 4), were co-localized with the cDNA clone AK044220 (Fig. 1A; Fig. S1). Clone D016D06, deposited by the German GeneTrap Consortium (GGTC) (http://tikus.gsf.de) (3, 4), was derived from insertion of a retroviral construct, rFlpROSAβgeo in 129S2 ES cells (Fig. 1A and C). The rFlpROSAβgeo construct carries a promoterless reporter gene, the β−geo cassette - an in-frame fusion of the β-galactosidase and neomycin resistance (Neor) gene (5), with a splicing acceptor (SA) immediately upstream, and a polyA signal downstream of the β−geo cassette (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Ncounter® Mouse Autoimmune Profiling Panel - Gene and Probe Details
    nCounter® Mouse AutoImmune Profiling Panel - Gene and Probe Details Official Symbol Accession Alias / Previous Symbol Official Full Name Other targets or Isoform Information AW208573,CD143,expressed sequence AW208573,MGD-MRK- Ace NM_009598.1 1032,MGI:2144508 angiotensin I converting enzyme (peptidyl-dipeptidase A) 1 2610036I19Rik,2610510L13Rik,Acinus,apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer in the nucleus,C79325,expressed sequence C79325,MGI:1913562,MGI:1919776,MGI:2145862,mKIAA0670,RIKEN cDNA Acin1 NM_001085472.2 2610036I19 gene,RIKEN cDNA 2610510L13 gene apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer 1 Acp5 NM_001102405.1 MGD-MRK-1052,TRACP,TRAP acid phosphatase 5, tartrate resistant 2310066K23Rik,AA960180,AI851923,Arp1b,expressed sequence AA960180,expressed sequence AI851923,MGI:2138136,MGI:2138359,RIKEN Actr1b NM_146107.2 cDNA 2310066K23 gene ARP1 actin-related protein 1B, centractin beta Adam17 NM_001277266.1 CD156b,Tace,tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme a disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 17 ADAR1,Adar1p110,Adar1p150,AV242451,expressed sequence Adar NM_001038587.3 AV242451,MGI:2139942,mZaADAR adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific Adora2a NM_009630.2 A2AAR,A2aR,A2a, Rs,AA2AR,MGD-MRK-16163 adenosine A2a receptor Ager NM_007425.2 RAGE advanced glycosylation end product-specific receptor AI265500,angiotensin precursor,Aogen,expressed sequence AI265500,MGD- Agt NM_007428.3 MRK-1192,MGI:2142488,Serpina8 angiotensinogen (serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 8) Ah,Ahh,Ahre,aromatic hydrocarbon responsiveness,aryl hydrocarbon
    [Show full text]
  • BMC Cell Biology Biomed Central
    BMC Cell Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins (NETs) that are up-regulated during myogenesis I-Hsiung Brandon Chen, Michael Huber, Tinglu Guan, Anja Bubeck and Larry Gerace* Address: Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10555 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla CA 92037, USA Email: I-Hsiung Brandon Chen - [email protected]; Michael Huber - [email protected]; Tinglu Guan - [email protected]; Anja Bubeck - [email protected]; Larry Gerace* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 24 October 2006 Received: 01 September 2006 Accepted: 24 October 2006 BMC Cell Biology 2006, 7:38 doi:10.1186/1471-2121-7-38 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2121/7/38 © 2006 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The nuclear lamina is a protein meshwork lining the inner nuclear membrane, which contains a polymer of nuclear lamins associated with transmembrane proteins of the inner nuclear membrane. The lamina is involved in nuclear structure, gene expression, and association of the cytoplasmic cytoskeleton with the nucleus. We previously identified a group of 67 novel putative nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins (NETs) in a large-scale proteomics analysis. Because mutations in lamina proteins have been linked to several human diseases affecting skeletal muscle, we examined NET expression during differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled the Androgen Receptor
    A Dissertation entitled The Androgen Receptor as a Transcriptional Co-activator: Implications in the Growth and Progression of Prostate Cancer By Mesfin Gonit Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD Degree in Biomedical science Dr. Manohar Ratnam, Committee Chair Dr. Lirim Shemshedini, Committee Member Dr. Robert Trumbly, Committee Member Dr. Edwin Sanchez, Committee Member Dr. Beata Lecka -Czernik, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo August 2011 Copyright 2011, Mesfin Gonit This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of The Androgen Receptor as a Transcriptional Co-activator: Implications in the Growth and Progression of Prostate Cancer By Mesfin Gonit As partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD Degree in Biomedical science The University of Toledo August 2011 Prostate cancer depends on the androgen receptor (AR) for growth and survival even in the absence of androgen. In the classical models of gene activation by AR, ligand activated AR signals through binding to the androgen response elements (AREs) in the target gene promoter/enhancer. In the present study the role of AREs in the androgen- independent transcriptional signaling was investigated using LP50 cells, derived from parental LNCaP cells through extended passage in vitro. LP50 cells reflected the signature gene overexpression profile of advanced clinical prostate tumors. The growth of LP50 cells was profoundly dependent on nuclear localized AR but was independent of androgen. Nevertheless, in these cells AR was unable to bind to AREs in the absence of androgen.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.873,482 B2 Stefanon Et Al
    US007873482B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7.873,482 B2 Stefanon et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 18, 2011 (54) DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM FOR SELECTING 6,358,546 B1 3/2002 Bebiak et al. NUTRITION AND PHARMACOLOGICAL 6,493,641 B1 12/2002 Singh et al. PRODUCTS FOR ANIMALS 6,537,213 B2 3/2003 Dodds (76) Inventors: Bruno Stefanon, via Zilli, 51/A/3, Martignacco (IT) 33035: W. Jean Dodds, 938 Stanford St., Santa Monica, (Continued) CA (US) 90403 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO99-67642 A2 12/1999 U.S.C. 154(b) by 158 days. (21)21) Appl. NoNo.: 12/316,8249 (Continued) (65) Prior Publication Data Swanson, et al., “Nutritional Genomics: Implication for Companion Animals'. The American Society for Nutritional Sciences, (2003).J. US 2010/O15301.6 A1 Jun. 17, 2010 Nutr. 133:3033-3040 (18 pages). (51) Int. Cl. (Continued) G06F 9/00 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ........................................................ 702/19 Primary Examiner—Edward Raymond (58) Field of Classification Search ................... 702/19 (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP 702/23, 182–185 See application file for complete search history. (57) ABSTRACT (56) References Cited An analysis of the profile of a non-human animal comprises: U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS a) providing a genotypic database to the species of the non 3,995,019 A 1 1/1976 Jerome human animal Subject or a selected group of the species; b) 5,691,157 A 1 1/1997 Gong et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapshot: the Nuclear Envelope II Andrea Rothballer and Ulrike Kutay Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
    SnapShot: The Nuclear Envelope II Andrea Rothballer and Ulrike Kutay Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland H. sapiens D. melanogaster C. elegans S. pombe S. cerevisiae Cytoplasmic filaments RanBP2 (Nup358) Nup358 CG11856 NPP-9 – – – Nup214 (CAN) DNup214 CG3820 NPP-14 Nup146 SPAC23D3.06c Nup159 Cytoplasmic ring and Nup88 Nup88 (Mbo) CG6819 – Nup82 SPBC13A2.02 Nup82 associated factors GLE1 GLE1 CG14749 – Gle1 SPBC31E1.05 Gle1 hCG1 (NUP2L1, NLP-1) tbd CG18789 – Amo1 SPBC15D4.10c Nup42 (Rip1) Nup98 Nup98 CG10198 Npp-10N Nup189N SPAC1486.05 Nup145N, Nup100, Nup116 Nup 98 complex RAE1 (GLE2) Rae1 CG9862 NPP-17 Rae1 SPBC16A3.05 Gle2 (Nup40) Nup160 Nup160 CG4738 NPP-6 Nup120 SPBC3B9.16c Nup120 Nup133 Nup133 CG6958 NPP-15 Nup132, Nup131 SPAC1805.04, Nup133 SPBP35G2.06c Nup107 Nup107 CG6743 NPP-5 Nup107 SPBC428.01c Nup84 Nup96 Nup96 CG10198 NPP-10C Nup189C SPAC1486.05 Nup145C Outer NPC scaffold Nup85 (PCNT1) Nup75 CG5733 NPP-2 Nup-85 SPBC17G9.04c Nup85 (Nup107-160 complex) Seh1 Nup44A CG8722 NPP-18 Seh1 SPAC15F9.02 Seh1 Sec13 Sec13 CG6773 Npp-20 Sec13 SPBC215.15 Sec13 Nup37 tbd CG11875 – tbd SPAC4F10.18 – Nup43 Nup43 CG7671 C09G9.2 – – – Centrin-21 tbd CG174931, CG318021 R08D7.51 Cdc311 SPCC1682.04 Cdc311 Nup205 tbd CG11943 NPP-3 Nup186 SPCC290.03c Nup192 Nup188 tbd CG8771 – Nup184 SPAP27G11.10c Nup188 Central NPC scaffold Nup155 Nup154 CG4579 NPP-8 tbd SPAC890.06 Nup170, Nup157 (Nup53-93 complex) Nup93 tbd CG7262 NPP-13 Nup97, Npp106 SPCC1620.11, Nic96 SPCC1739.14 Nup53(Nup35, MP44) tbd CG6540 NPP-19 Nup40 SPAC19E9.01c
    [Show full text]
  • TAB3 Antibody Catalog # ASC10268
    10320 Camino Santa Fe, Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.875.1900 Fax: 858.622.0609 TAB3 Antibody Catalog # ASC10268 Specification TAB3 Antibody - Product Information Application IHC Primary Accession Q8N5C8 Other Accession NP_690000, 98991767 Reactivity Human Host Rabbit Clonality Polyclonal Isotype IgG Application Notes TAB3 antibody can be used for detection of TAB3 by immunohistoc Immunohistochemistry of TAB3 in human hemistry at 5 kidney tissue with TAB3 antibody at 5 µg/mL. µg/mL. TAB3 Antibody - Background TAB3 Antibody - Additional Information TAB3 Antibody: TAB3 functions in the Gene ID 257397 NF-kappaB signal transduction pathway. It and Other Names the similar and functionally redundant protein TAB3 Antibody: NAP1, MAP3K7IP3, TAB2, form a ternary complex with the protein TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 and kinase TAK1 and either TRAF2 or TRAF6 in MAP3K7-binding protein 3, response to stimulation with the Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF or IL-1. kinase 7-interacting protein 3, TAB-3, Subsequent TAK1 kinase activity triggers a TGF-beta activated kinase 1/MAP3K7 signaling cascade leading to activation of the binding protein 3 NF-kappaB transcription factor. Recent experiments have shown that TAB2 and the Target/Specificity related protein TAB3 constitutitvely interact TAB3; TAB3 antibody is human specific. with the autophagy mediator Beclin-1; upon TAB3 antibody is predicted not to induction of autophagy, these proteins cross-react with other TAB proteins. dissociate from Beclin-1 and bind TAK1. Reconstitution & Storage Overexpression of TAB2 and TAB3 inhibit TAB3 antibody can be stored at 4℃ for autophagy, while their depletion triggers it, three months and -20℃, stable for up to suggesting that TAB2 and TAB3 act as a one year.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Risk Factors for Radiation Vasculopathy
    Retina Genetic Risk Factors for Radiation Vasculopathy Thanos D. Papakostas,1 Margaux A. Morrison,2 Anne Marie Lane,1 Caroline Awh,1 Margaret M. DeAngelis,2 Evangelos S. Gragoudas,1 and Ivana K. Kim1 1Ocular Melanoma Center and Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States Correspondence: Ivana K. Kim, As- PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to perform a genome-wide scan for polymorphisms sociate Professor of Ophthalmology, associated with risk of vision loss from radiation complications in patients treated with proton Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard beam irradiation for choroidal melanoma. Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; METHODS. We identified a cohort of 126 patients at high risk of radiation complications due to [email protected]. tumor location within 2 disc diameters of the optic nerve and/or fovea who provided a blood Submitted: August 11, 2017 sample to the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Uveal Melanoma Repository. Controls (n ¼ 76) were Accepted: February 13, 2018 defined as patients with visual acuity 20/40 or better 3 years after treatment. Cases (n ¼ 50) were selected as patients with visual acuity 20/200 or worse due to radiation damage 3 years Citation: Papakostas TD, Morrison MA, after treatment. Genotyping of these samples was performed using the Omni 2.5 chip Lane AM, et al. Genetic risk factors for radiation vasculopathy. Invest Oph- (Illumina, Inc.). thalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:1547–1553.
    [Show full text]