U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix: Women Who Kept the Lights, 1776- 1947
This PDF of the appendix of Women Who Kept the Lights was created for www. lighthousehistory.info and is copyrighted material Appendix: Women Who Kept the Lights, 1776- 1947 This appendix was initially based on the handwritten registers of lighthouse keepers and their assistants reproduced in National Archives microfilm publication no. M1373.1 Some of the handwriting in these registers was very difficult to read; for example, Ellis was read as Ellie, but corrected through correspondence. Nor could first names like Darrell be easily identified as masculine or feminine. This appendix does not include dozens of women who served for a period of months (less than a year) after a father’s or husband’s death, while they waited for the arrival of a new keeper. Nor does it include the hundreds of women who served as assistant keepers. Several of the women whose careers are detailed in this book, however, served as both assistant keepers and keepers. Two in particular—Kathleen Moore and Ida Lewis—began keeping the lights while still in their teens and spent most of their lives in lighthouses. Because their experiences as assistants have been recorded, those years are included in their chapters. The total number of women serving as principal keepers for more than a year and included in this appendix is 142; some have been added for the period both before and after the volumes listed above were recorded and were found in subsequent research; however, we do not include women who were assigned keeper duties after lighthouses were transferred to the U.S. -
CE-1529 Elk Neck State Park
CE-1529 Elk Neck State Park Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 11-26-2018 Addendum to Inventory No. CE-1529 Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form Page 1 of 1 Name of Property: Elk Neck State Park Location: Elk Neck Peninsula The following is an update to the "Table of Resources" inventoried at Elk Neck State Park in 2003: MIHP Number Name Condition as of April 2018 CE-1529 Elk Neck State Park, Wersen House Razed, date unknown CE-813 located within CE-1529 Bathon Stone House Razed, 2012 Bathon Barn Razed,2012 -
Camping Places (Campsites and Cabins) with Carderock Springs As
Camping places (campsites and cabins) With Carderock Springs as the center of the universe, here are a variety of camping locations in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Delaware. A big round of applause to Carderock’s Eric Nothman for putting this list together, doing a lot of research so the rest of us can spend more time camping! CAMPING in Maryland 1) Marsden Tract - 5 mins - (National Park Service) - C&O canal Mile 11 (1/2 mile above Carderock) three beautiful group campsites on the Potomac. Reservations/permit required. Max 20 to 30 people each. C&O canal - hiker/biker campsites (no permit needed - all are free!) about every five miles starting from Swains Lock to Cumberland. Campsites all the way to Paw Paw, WV (about 23 sites) are within 2 hrs drive. Three private campgrounds (along the canal) have cabins. Some sections could be traveled by canoe on the Potomac (canoe camping). Closest: Swains Lock - 10 mins - 5 individual tent only sites (one isolated - take path up river) - all close to parking lot. First come/first serve only. Parking fills up on weekends by 8am. Group Campsites are located at McCoy's Ferry, Fifteen Mile Creek, Paw Paw Tunnel, and Spring Gap. They are $20 per site, per night with a maximum of 35 people. Six restored Lock-houses - (several within a few miles of Carderock) - C&O Canal Trust manages six restored Canal Lock-houses for nightly rental (some with heat, water, A/C). 2) Cabin John Regional Park - 10 mins - 7 primitive walk-in sites. Pit toilets, running water. -
The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: an Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 012 SE 046 389 AUTHOR Paige, John C. TITLE The Civilian Conservation Corps and the National Park Service, 1933-1942: An Administrative History. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NPS-D-189 PUB DATE 85 NOTE 293p.; Photographs may not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Conservation (Environment); Employment Programs; *Environmental Education; *Federal Programs; Forestry; Natural Resources; Parks; *Physical Environment; *Resident Camp Programs; Soil Conservation IDENTIFIERS *Civilian Conservation Corps; Environmental Management; *National Park Service ABSTRACT The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) has been credited as one of Franklin D. Roosevelt's most successful effortsto conserve both the natural and human resources of the nation. This publication provides a review of the program and its impacton resource conservation, environmental management, and education. Chapters give accounts of: (1) the history of the CCC (tracing its origins, establishment, and termination); (2) the National Park Service role (explaining national and state parkprograms and co-operative planning elements); (3) National Park Servicecamps (describing programs and personnel training and education); (4) contributions of the CCC (identifying the major benefits ofthe program in the areas of resource conservation, park and recreational development, and natural and archaeological history finds); and (5) overall -
Where to Go Camping Guide
Where to go Camping Guide Amangamek-Wipit Lodge #470 Order of the Arrow National Capital Area Council Camping Promotions Committee 2020 Edition Joseph Cawley, Camping Promotions John O’Connell, Camping Promotions Adviser Chair Dr. Lawrence Kotler, Camping Promotions Associate Adviser William H. Gouker, Lodge Chief Kevin P. Brendel, Lodge Adviser Boy Scouts of America Order of the Arrow National Capital Area Council Amangamek-Wipit Lodge #470 boyscouts-ncac.org wipit470.org Table of Contents 1. Letter from the Chief ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Letter from the Committee Chairman ............................................................................... 5 3. Council Camps .................................................................................................................. 6 A. Goshen Scout Reservation ........................................................................................................ 6 B. Cub Scout Camps ...................................................................................................................... 8 C. High Adventure Opportunities .................................................................................................. 9 4. Council Summer Camp Information ................................................................................. 12 A. Goshen Scout Reservation ....................................................................................................... 12 B. Camp William -
National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act 2014 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
GSA Office of Real Property Utilization and Disposal National Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act 2014 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lighthouses play an important role in America’s cultural For More Information: history, serving as aids to navigation (ATONs) for Information about specific lights in the NHLPA program is maritime vessels since before America’s founding. As a available at the following websites: way to preserve these pieces of our national heritage, Congress passed the National Historic Lighthouse National Park Service Lighthouse Heritage: Preservation Act (NHLPA) in 2000. The NHLPA http://www.nps.gov/maritime/nhlpa/intro.htm recognizes the importance of lighthouses and light General Services Administration Property Sales: stations (collectively called “lights”) to maritime traffic www.realestatesales.gov and the historical, cultural, recreational, and educational value of these iconic properties, especially for coastal communities and nonprofit organizations that serve as stewards who are dedicated to their continued Purpose of the Report: preservation. Through the NHLPA, Federal agencies, state and local governments, and not-for-profit This report outlines: organizations (non-profits) can obtain historic lights at no 1) The history of the NHLPA program; cost through stewardship transfers. If suitable public stewards are not found for a light, GSA will sell the light 2) The roles and responsibilities of the three Federal in a public auction (i.e., a public sale). Transfer deeds partner agencies executing the program; include covenants in the conveyance document to 3) Calendar Year1 2014 highlights and historical protect the light’s historic features and/or preserve disposal trends of the program; accessibility for the public. -
1. Name of Property Historic Name: Turkey Point Light
NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 TURKEY POINT LIGHT STATION Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service__________ National Register of Historic Places Registration For ___________________________________________ I 1. Name of Property historic name: Turkey Point Light Station other names/site number: CE - 195 2. Location street & number: N/A not for publication: N/A city or town: near North East vicinity X state: Maryland; code: MD county: Cecil code: 015 zip code: N/A 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination and request for eligibility determination meet the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant locally. (_See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ftain, U. Sr. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Civil Engineering 2/22/02 Signature of certifying official Date Department of Transportation, U.S. Coast Guard State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property A meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. See continuation sheet for additional comments.) griature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 TURKEY POINT LIGHT STATION Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. -
Research and Trends A
III. RESEARCH AND TRENDS A. MARYLAND’S CHANGING POPULATION Maryland’s population has been steadily growing. While public outdoor recreation amenities CENTRAL in the state attract tourists from outside of WESTERN • 55% of Maryland’s total Maryland, residents comprise the largest pool of • 8% of Statewide population Population • Significant differences existing local outdoor recreators and potential • Predominantly Caucasian in median age, income, new participants. Unless otherwise noted, the • Higher Median Age and racial composition characteristics of the statewide population • Lower Median Household between populations presented are based on the latest public data Income of counties and City of available from the Maryland Department of Baltimore Planning as of July 2018. Characteristics SOUTHERN by Region Key Characteristics of Maryland’s • 30% of the statewide Population by Service Region population EASTERN • Most racially diverse • Least populous service Total Population and Distribution of Residents service region and only region As of July 2017, the Maryland Department of minority-majority region • Predominantly Caucasian Planning estimated the total statewide population • Household income at or • Lowest median higher than statewide household income levels to be 6,052,177. At the time of the last Census in median • Highest median age 2010, Maryland’s population was 5,775,562. As residents illustrated in Figure 5 (on the following page), the Central Region is home to over half of the state’s population and is the most populous service -
U.S. Coast Guard Historian's Office
U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office Preserving Our History For Future Generations Historic Light Station Information MARYLAND BALTIMORE LIGHT Location: South entrance to Baltimore Channel, Chesapeake Bay, off the mouth of the Magothy River Date Built: Commissioned 1908 Type of Structure: Caisson with octagonal brick dwelling / light tower Height: 52 feet above mean high water Characteristics: Flashing white with one red sector Foghorn: Yes (initially bell, replaced with a horn by 1923) Builder: William H. Flaherty / U. S. Fidelity and Guarantee Co. Appropriation: $120,000 + Range: white – 7 miles, red – 5 miles Status: Standing and Active Historical Information: This is one of the last lighthouses built on the Chesapeake Bay. The fact that it was built at all is a testimony to the importance of Baltimore as a commercial port. The original appropriation request to Congress for a light at this location was made in 1890 and $60,000 was approved four years later. However, bottom tests of proposed sites showed a 55 foot layer of semi-fluid mud before a sand bottom was hit. This extreme engineering challenge made construction of a light within the proposed cost impossible. An additional $60,000 was requested and finally appropriated in 1902. Even then, the project had to be re-bid because no contractor came forth within the allotted budget. Finally, the contract was awarded to William H. Flaherty (who had built the Solomon’s Lump and Smith Point lights). The materials were gathered and partially assembled at Lazaretto Point Depot, then towed to the site and lowered to the bottom in September 1902. -
Washington–Rochambeau Revolutionary Route
Resource Study & Environmental Assessment WASHINGTON–ROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY ROUTE Northeast and National Capital Regions National Park Service—U.S. Department of the Interior October 2006 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT This document is the Resource Study and Environmental Assessment (study/EA) for the Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route. It describes the National Park Service’s preferred approach to preserving and interpreting route resources and one other alternative. The evaluation of potential environmental impacts that may result from imple- mentation of these alternatives is integrated in this document. This study/EA is available for public review for a period of 30 days. During the review period, the National Park Service is accepting comments from interested parties via the Planning, Environment and Public Comment website http://parkplanning.nps.gov/, at public meetings which may be held, and at the address below. At the end of the re- view period, the National Park Service will carefully review all comments and determine whether any changes should be made to the report. No sooner than thirty (30) days from the end of the review period, the National Park Service will prepare and publish a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) to explain which alternative has been selected, and why it will not have any significant environmental impacts. A summary of responses to public comments will be prepared. Factual corrections or additional material submitted by commentators that do not affect the alternative may be incorporated in errata sheets and attached to the study/EA. The study/EA and FONSI will be transmitted to the Secretary of the Interior who will make a recommendation to Congress. -
Chapter 4 Community Facilities Element
Chapter 4 Community Facilities Element Goals Provide adequate community facilities, public services, and utilities required to maintain the health, safety and welfare of the residents of North East. Provide adequate parks, open space, and recreational opportunities equitably distributed throughout the Town for existing and future Town residents. Objectives Assure the continued expansion of public facilities and services commensurate with the local financial capabilities and the capacity of each system. Assure that the limitations imposed by the environmentally sensitive areas are considered when planning extensions of community facilities. Continue to require developers to pay for all road, water, and other community facilities and services extensions and additions needed as a result of new development. Certify that all existing, newly developed, and annexed areas of the Town are afforded adequate public services necessary to promote public health, safety, and welfare. Examine the pattern and direction of future growth and possible annexation and impacts on community facilities systems. Encourage the development of a Community Center and/or more recreational and/or entertainment opportunities for North East’s youth. Encourage use of public lands and buildings for a variety of public purposes. Identify a site or sites for regional parks in future annexation areas. Examine and refine, if necessary, the policy of requiring usable park/open space during development review and approval. Provide for the contribution of fees in lieu of parks in subdivisions where appropriate. North East Comprehensive Plan-2012 4-1 Town of North East, Maryland The adequacy and capacity of public services and facilities are important to the improvement of the quality of life for the citizens of North East. -
Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018
Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018 Dear Citizens: Our land is the foundation of our economic and social prosperity, rich in productive forests and farms, vital wildlife habitat, opportunities for recreation and tourism, culture and history. As our State grows and changes, it is important to continually evaluate our mission and investments for the benefit of Maryland and its citizens. As champion of public land conservation and outdoor recreation, DNR is pleased to present the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan for 2014-2018 — a comprehensive, statewide plan that will guide our efforts to conserve open space and enhance outdoor resources on State lands for the next five years. Outlining clear goals and measurable action items, the Plan will enhance coordination among local, County and State planners; promote the benefits of outdoor recreation and natural resources; improve access to land and water-based recreation for every Marylander; and connect public trails and lands to the places where people work, live and play. This Plan was developed in cooperation with State, County and local officials, stakeholders and citizens in accordance with the U.S. Department of Interior, Land and Water Conservation Fund guidelines. By helping direct preservation to priority lands and fostering a greater connection to the outdoors, it supports the benefits of health and recreation, economic vitality and environmental sustainability for all citizens. Sincerely, Martin O’Malley Joseph P. Gill Governor Secretary THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018 “Connecting People & Places” Honorable Martin J. O’Malley, Governor State of Maryland Joseph P.