DOCSLIB.ORG

Security Council Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Security Council Report United Nations S/PV.6503 Security Council Provisional Sixty-sixth year 6503rd meeting Wednesday, 23 March 2011, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Li Baodong .................................. (China) Members: Bosnia and Herzegovina ........................... Mr. Barbalić Brazil ......................................... Mrs. Viotti Colombia ...................................... Mr. Osorio France ......................................... Mr. Briens Gabon ......................................... Mr. Messone Germany ....................................... Mr. Wittig India .......................................... Mr. Hardeep Singh Puri Lebanon ....................................... Ms. Ziade Nigeria ........................................ Mrs. Ogwu Portugal ....................................... Mr. Moraes Cabral Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Pankin South Africa .................................... Mr. Mashabane United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .... Mr. Parham United States of America ........................... Mr. Dunn Agenda Post-conflict peacebuilding Report of the Peacebuilding Commission on its fourth session (S/2011/41) This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the interpretation of speeches delivered in the other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service, room U-506. 11-27495 (E) *1127495* S/PV.6503 The meeting was called to order at 10.15 a.m. Permanent Representatives of Ireland, Mexico and South Africa, offered an opportunity to appreciate the Adoption of the agenda potentials of and the challenges facing the Commission. The momentum generated by the 2010 The agenda was adopted. review must be maintained especially as the Commission further expands its agenda. Post-conflict peacebuilding The report of the Peacebuilding Commission Report of the Peacebuilding Commission on its reflects a collective effort on the part of the members of fourth session (S/2011/41) its Organizational Committee. Progress has been made The President (spoke in Chinese): Under rule 39 in addressing emerging recommendations from the 2010 of the Council’s provisional rules of procedure, I invite review, in particular in connection with the creation of a His Excellency Mr. Eugène-Richard Gasana, new PBC country-specific configuration on Liberia. The Chairperson of the Peacebuilding Commission and report also reflects the Commission’s plans to take Permanent Representative of Rwanda, to participate in forward the recommendations from the review in a way this meeting. that would facilitate its annual reporting to the General Assembly and the Security Council. The Security Council will now being its consideration of the item on its agenda. The Commission is proceeding in this direction on the basis of a road map of actions in 2011. It I wish to draw the attention of members of the focuses on meeting practical objectives and making Council to document S/2011/41, containing the report concrete progress in enhancing the Commission’s of the Peacebuilding Commission on its fourth session. impact on national capacity-development, resource At this meeting, the Security Council will hear a mobilization and aligning key actors behind common briefing by His Excellency Mr. Peter Wittig, Permanent peacebuilding objectives. Representative of Germany and former Chairperson of Allow me to highlight a few elements from the the Peacebuilding Commission. report. First, the report underscores the thematic focus I now give the floor to Mr Wittig. of the Commission during its fourth session around the theme “Partnership for peacebuilding”. In view of the Mr. Wittig (Germany): On behalf of the members complexity of peacebuilding challenges and the of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC), I am pleased multiplicity of actors, the need for coherence and to present the report of the Commission on its fourth partnerships cannot be overemphasized. Building and session (S/2011/41). strengthening partnerships has been identified as a key Strengthening the peacebuilding agenda, area of potential value added for the Commission. In enhancing its impact in the field and providing this regard, the Organizational Committee devoted the continued support to the peacebuilding efforts in majority of its efforts and time to engaging the Burundi, the Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau international financial institutions, especially the World and Sierra Leone were at the core of the Commission’s Bank, and regional organizations, especially the work in 2010. In September 2010, the Commission African Union. Generally, the Chairperson and Vice- made Liberia the fifth country on the agenda in Chairpersons focused on joining up with a range of response to a request from the Security Council on potential partners from civil society and academia. behalf of the Government of Liberia. Most recently, the Secondly, the Commission has particularly Commission responded to a request for advice and prioritized the need to strengthen the interaction with accompaniment from the Republic of Guinea. This was the principal organs of the United Nations. It worked to the first time that such a request was directly submitted generate interest in its work across the membership of to the Commission. the General Assembly, the Security Council and the In 2010, peacebuilding and the future role of the Economic and Social Council. During the reporting United Nations peacebuilding architecture were very period, the Commission witnessed a growing openness prominently discussed within and outside the United and encouraging signs of interest on the part of the Nations. The review, which was ably guided by the Security Council and the Economic and Social Council. 2 11-27495 S/PV.6503 The important thematic debates convened by the through well-deserved focus on the socio-economic Security Council between February 2010 and February dimension of peacebuilding. 2011 offered recurring opportunities for the PBC, the Going forward, the Commission looks forward to United Nations membership and senior leadership to further deepening its linkages with the General engage with the Council around critical peacebuilding- Assembly. There is a clear need to bring to bear the related policies. The participation of the World Bank in Assembly’s perspective on key thematic issues. a number of these debates also confirmed the evolving partnership with the Bank at a time when it is further Thirdly, the Commission continues to receive developing its approach to assisting countries emerging direct and substantive support from the Peacebuilding from conflict. Briefings by the Chairs of the country Support Office. Notwithstanding its stretched capacity, configurations contributed to the discussions of the the Office has also been an essential linkage between Council at its periodic considerations of the situations the Commission and the operational entities within and and mandates involving the countries on the outside the United Nations system. The Office has also Commission’s agenda. continued to provide regular briefings on the activities and operations of the Peacebuilding Fund. Those Most recently, the Council has engaged the briefings have contributed to deepening the Chairs in informal dialogues on certain country understanding of the synergy between the Commission situations. The outcome of the thematic debates and the and the Fund in the countries on the Commission’s deepening of the engagement of the Chairs of the PBC agenda. The recently introduced interaction with the country configurations marked an important step Fund’s Advisory Group has provided the Commission towards more serious consideration by the Council of with an opportunity to address a number of broad the Commission’s advisory role. I would like to policy issues for the Fund. advocate for enhanced interaction between the Commission and the Council. The Fund’s resources, combined with the efforts of the Commission, helped to ensure that the countries The 2010 review highlighted in particular the on the Commission’s agenda benefited from the potential for developing a dynamic linkage between the sustained attention and support of the international Commission and the Council. Eleven of the 15 members community, with 64 per cent of the Fund’s total of the Security Council are currently members of the contributions being allocated to those countries. PBC. That joint membership provides a natural interface that could facilitate the Council’s drawing more actively By linking up the Peacebuilding Commission’s and regularly on the Commission’s advice. work to that of peacekeeping, development and political actors in the field, the Commission has added The Commission could provide early considerable value. The challenge facing the peacebuilding perspectives in the design and review of, Commission in demonstrating its full potential, or transition from, peacekeeping mandates. It could however, is to ensure that its work is backed by a identify and promote country-specific sustainability higher level of political commitment from the Member factors. It could catalyse early partnerships with the States and the senior leadership of the United Nations. international financial institutions. And it could As noted by the co-facilitators
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia, Iran and the (Increasingly) Lonely Superpower
    MARCH 2015 RUSSIA, IRAN, AND THE (INCREASINGLY) LONELY SUPERPOWER By John R. Haines John R. Haines is a Senior Fellow of the Foreign Policy Research Institute and directs the Princeton Committee of FPRI. Much of his current research is focused on Russia and its near abroad, with a special interest in nationalist and separatist movements. The translation of all source material is by the author unless noted otherwise. Leadership is the other side of the coin of loneliness. -Ferdinand Marcos There is no loneliness greater than the loneliness of a failure. -Eric Hoffer “The Lonely Superpower” is the title of Samuel Huntington’s 1999 essay in which he wrote, “The circle of governments who see their interests coinciding with American interests is shrinking. This is manifest, among other ways, in the central lineup among the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.”1 Nowhere does it manifest more clearly today than in the current P5+1 talks with Iran. The P5+1 group consists of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—plus Germany. According to Kayhan Barzegar, who directs the Tehran-based Institute of Middle East Strategic Studies, “The logic of Iran-Russia relations in the P5+1 has so far been based on three strategic principles: implementing diplomacy, removing sanctions, and containing the threat.”2 Barzegar claims that in January, the P5+1 signaled a shift in emphasis away from strategic and weaponization aspects of the Iranian nuclear program—“the Israeli and the Saudi paths...to bring the Iranian nuclear program to zero”—and toward considerations of verification and transparency.3 The three European P5+1 members' reaction to the recent letter to Iran's leaders drafted by Arkansas freshman Senator Tom Cotton was unsurprising if varying in tone.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full PDF of Berlin Journal
    2014 THE BERLIN JOURNAL ALL f A Magazine from the American Academy in Berlin Number Twenty-Seven Fall 2014 NUMBER 27 THE BERLIN JOURNAL THE BERLIN THE AMERIcAN AcAdEMy Celebrating Twenty Years fIcTION IN BERLIN Jonathan Lethem, Mynona, Nicole Krauss, Adam Ross barkOw LEIBINgER Architectural Portfolio with an Essay by Hal Foster beatriz colomina Collaboration in Modern Architecture THE holbrookE fORUM Harold Hongju Koh and Louise Arbour on Peace and Justice MONIcA black Spiritual Redemption in Postwar Germany Zeit für eine Revolution. ø U n i t e . Nie wieder Einzeltarife. Ein individueller Preis für Ihr gesamtes Unternehmen. Minuten-, SMS- und Datenkontingente fl exibel nach Ihrem Bedarf defi nieren. Ein System, so intelligent wie keines zuvor. ø Unite. ø Business – Mehr unternehmen. Jetzt 3 Monate kostenlos testen* 0800 - 10 90 878 | o2unite.de Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 23 – 25, 80992 München *Bei O2 Unite greifen alle Mitarbeiter eines Unternehmens auf vom Unternehmen festgelegte Kontingente für nationale und internationale Gesprächs-, SMS- und Datenvolumina (= Pools) zu. Mit Beginn der Try&Buy-Phase schließt der Kunde einen Vertrag mit einer Mindestvertragslaufzeit von 27 Monaten ab. Während der ersten 3 Monate (Try&Buy) werden die monatlichen Grundgebühren der gebuchten nationalen Voice-, Data- und SMS-Pools zu 100 % rabattiert, für eine etwaige Überschreitung der monatlichen Volumina dieser Pools entstehen keinerlei Kosten. Die Rabattierung im Rahmen von Try&Buy gilt nur für das initial ausgewählte nationale Poolportfolio. Eine Anpassung der Poolvolumina ist für alle nationalen und internationalen Pools bis zum Ende der Try&Buy-Phase jederzeit möglich. Während der Try&Buy-Phase nicht genutzte monatliche Pool Volumina der nationalen Try&Buy-Pools stehen im Folgemonat nicht zur Verfügung.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA, IRAN, and the (INCREASINGLY) LONELY SUPERPOWER by John R. Haines
    MARCH 2015 RUSSIA, IRAN, AND THE (INCREASINGLY) LONELY SUPERPOWER By John R. Haines John R. Haines is a Senior Fellow of the Foreign Policy Research Institute and directs the Princeton Committee of FPRI. Much of his current research is focused on Russia and its near abroad, with a special interest in nationalist and separatist movements. The translation of all source material is by the author unless noted otherwise. Leadership is the other side of the coin of loneliness. -Ferdinand Marcos There is no loneliness greater than the loneliness of a failure. -Eric Hoffer “The Lonely Superpower” is the title of Samuel Huntington’s 1999 essay in which he wrote, “The circle of governments who see their interests coinciding with American interests is shrinking. This is manifest, among other ways, in the central lineup among the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.”1 Nowhere does it manifest more clearly today than in the current P5+1 talks with Iran. The P5+1 group consists of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—plus Germany. According to Kayhan Barzegar, who directs the Tehran-based Institute of Middle East Strategic Studies, “The logic of Iran-Russia relations in the P5+1 has so far been based on three strategic principles: implementing diplomacy, removing sanctions, and containing the threat.”2 Barzegar claims that in January, the P5+1 signaled a shift in emphasis away from strategic and weaponization aspects of the Iranian nuclear program—“the Israeli and the Saudi paths...to bring the Iranian nuclear program to zero”—and toward considerations of verification and transparency.3 The three European P5+1 members' reaction to the recent letter to Iran's leaders drafted by Arkansas freshman Senator Tom Cotton was unsurprising if varying in tone.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassador Amina Salum Ali, African Union Mission Chargé D'affaires
    WOMEN’S FOREIGN POLICY GROUP Ambassador Amina Salum Ali, African Union Mission Chargé d'Affaires Joy Dee Samantha Davis, Embassy of Antigua & Barbuda Ambassador Cecilia Nahón, Embassy of Argentina Ambassador Tigran Sargsyan, Embassy of Armenia Ambassador Kim Beazley, AC, Embassy of Australia Ambassador Hans Peter Manz, Embassy of Austria Ambassador Elin Suleymanov, Embassy of Azerbaijan Ambassador Mohammad Ziauddin, Embassy of Bangladesh Ambassador Nestor Mendez, Embassy of Belize Ambassador Jadranka Negodić, Embassy of Bosnia and Herzegovina Chargé d'Affaires Emolemo Morake, Embassy of Botswana Ambassador Luiz Alberto Figueiredo Machado, Embassy of Brazil Ambassador Elena B. Poptodorova, Embassy of Bulgaria Ambassador Faida M. Mitifu, Embassy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Ambassador Román Macaya Hayes, Embassy of Costa Rica Ambassador Josip Joško Paro, Embassy of Croatia Ambassador George Chacalli, Embassy of Cyprus Ambassador Petr Gandalovič, Embassy of the Czech Republic Ambassador Peter Taksøe-Jensen, Embassy of Denmark Ambassador Hubert Charles, Embassy of Dominica Ambassador Mohamed Tawfik, Embassy of Egypt Ambassador David O'Sullivan, Delegation of the European Union Ambassador Ritva Koukku-Ronde, Embassy of Finland Ambassador Gérard Araud, Embassy of France Chargé d'Affaires Sheikh Omar Faye, Embassy of The Gambia Ambassador Archil Gegeshidze, Embassy of Georgia Ambassador Peter Wittig, Embassy of Germany Ambassador Christos P. Panagopoulos, Embassy of Greece Ambassador Bayney Karran, Embassy of Guyana Ambassador Paul Altidor, Embassy of Haiti Ambassador Geir H. Haarde, Embassy of Iceland Ambassador Shri. Arun Kumar Singh, Embassy of India Ambassador Anne Anderson, Embassy of Ireland Ambassador Claudio Bisogniero, Embassy of Italy Ambassador Kenichiro Sasae, Embassy of Japan Ambassador Kairat Umarov, Embassy of Kazakhstan Ambassador Antoine Chedid, Embassy of Lebanon Ambassador Eliachim Molapi Sebatane, Embassy of Lesotho Ambassador Jeremiah C.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur F. Burns Fellowship Program
    Arthur F. Burns Fellowship Program 2016 Annual Report Mission Chairman’s Letter Ottawa It’s an eventful time to be a journalist in the United States, Canada and Germany. The Arthur F. Burns Fellowship program With the refugee crisis in Europe, Britain’s is an exchange of journalists between Ger- referendum on European Union member- many and the United States/Canada, with ship, the U.S. presidential election, the re- the primary purpose of increasing public cent shift of government in Canada, and knowledge and understanding about the the war in Ukraine, among many others, three countries, and the relations between there is no shortage of major events to them, through independent mass media. cover that affect the entire transatlantic A parallel goal of the program is to devel- community. Knowledgeable, experienced op reporters who are interested, skilled and reporters are vital to understanding these informed about transatlantic relations. On complex situations. its 25th anniversary in 2013, the fellow- The best training ground for report- ship expanded to include Canada. ers is on the job, and working as a foreign Each year, the program brings together correspondent is akin to graduate-level 10 reporters from each side of the Atlan- training. For many Arthur F. Burns Fel- lows, their fellowship is one of their first tic and, following a week-long orientation Marcus W. Brauchli program in Washington, places them in Managing Partner, opportunities to report overseas. Fellows newsrooms of the other country to work North Base Media; often describe their experience as a trial by Former editor-in-chief of fire—one in which they emerge stronger, for two months, producing articles and The Wall Street Journal and programs for home and foreign audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL of INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PERCEPTIONS Spring 2018 Volume Number XXIII 1
    PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PERCEPTIONS Spring 2018 Volume XXIII Number 1 XXIII Number 2018 Volume Spring PERCEPTIONS Civilian Powers and Comtemporary Global Challenges Bahadır PEHLİVANTÜRK and Birgül DEMİRTAŞ The Transformative Power of the EU in a Changing International Order Mustafa KUTLAY Civilian Powers and the Use of Force: The Evolution of Germany as a ‘Realist Civilian Power’ Birgül DEMİRTAŞ & Mahmut MAZLUM Assessing the Role of Trade in the Formation of Turkey’s Civilian Power in Africa Emel PARLAR DAL, Ali Murat KURŞUN, Hakan MEHMETCİK A ‘Cool’ Approach to Japanese Foreign Policy: Linking Anime to International Relations İbrahim AKBAŞ Competing Interests of Major Powers in the Middle East: The Case Study of Syria and Its Implications for Regional Stability Saman ZULFQAR Spring 2018 Volume XXIII - Number 1 ISSN 1300-8641 Style and Format PERCEPTIONS Articles submitted to the journal should be original contributions. If another version of the article is under consideration by another publication, or has been or will be published elsewhere, authors should clearly indicate this at the time of submission. Manuscripts should be submitted to: e-mail: [email protected] Editor The final decision on whether the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Journal or not is made by the Editorial Board depending on the anonymous referees’ review reports. Emre Erşen A standard length for PERCEPTIONS articles is 6,000 to 8,000 words including endnotes. The manuscript should begin with an indented and italicised summary up to 150 words, which should describe the main arguments and conclusions, and 5-7 keywords, indicating to main themes of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing History How Germany and France Create And
    Master of Arts Thesis Euroculture Uppsala University (Home) Palacky University (Host) August 2018 (Re)Writing History How Germany and France Create and Project EU Narratives Abroad Lauren Rogers [email protected] Student number first university: Student number second university: Supervised by: Moa Mårtensson Martin Petlach Strasbourg, 15.07.2018 Submitted by: Lauren Rogers MA Programme Euroculture Declaration I, Lauren Rogers, hereby declare that this thesis, entitled, “(Re)Writing History: How Germany and France Create and Project EU Narratives Abroad” submitted as partial requirement for the MA Programme Euroculture, is my own original work and expressed in my own words. Any use made within this text of works of other authors in any form (e.g. ideas, figures, texts, tables, etc.) are properly acknowledged in the text as well as in the bibliography. I declare that the written (printed and bound) and the electronic copy of the submitted MA thesis are identical. I hereby also acknowledge that I was informed about the regulations pertaining to the assessment of the MA thesis Euroculture and about the general completion rules for the Master of Arts Programme Euroculture. Signed ....................................................................... Date ....15/07/2018.................................... 2 Abstract ‘Narrative’ has become such a pervasive term in media and political jargon that its theoretical backbone has become harder to trace. With this in mind, this thesis seeks to contribute to the theoretical understanding of narratives in international relations research, with a focus on the European Union. This thesis begins with a discussion on narratives in the international system, what kinds of power they exert, and how they provide structure.
    [Show full text]
  • 66Th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting Annual Report 2016
    66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting Annual Report 2016 1 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting Annual Report 2016 Contents » 66th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting » Outreach Projects & Mission Education » The Council & the Foundation Overcoming Barriers with Science 4 SCIENTIFIC ProGrammE The Mediatheque 70 TH NCE COU IL 98 Greeting by Countess Bettina Bernadotte and Jürgen Kluge Quantum Technology – A Revolution in the Making 16 Educational Outreach 72 A Platform for Communication and Understanding Interview with Scientific Co-Chairman Rainer Blatt THE FOUNDATION 99 Speech by German Federal Minister of Education and 8 Teaching Spirit and School Visit 74 Research Johanna Wanka What a Time to be Alive in Physics! 18 Founders Assembly 100 Interview with Scientific Co-Chairman Lars Bergström Nature Video Lindau Collection 2016 75 Prospects and Reflections 10 Honorary Senate 102 Statements from the Opening Ceremony Gravitational Waves – a Whole new Window on the Universe! 20 Alumni of the Lindau Meetings 78 Q&A with George Smoot from Nature Outlook In Loving Memory 103 Opening Ceremony 12 A Fellowship for European Innovation 80 The Future of Education in Sciences 38 Guardians of the Future 104 Report on the closing day panel discussion Nobel Heroes 82 Farewell speech by Wolfgang Schürer PARTICIPANTS, PARTNERS, SupporTERS Wim Wenders on the new portrait book by Peter Badge Poster Session 40 Participants 22 Sketches of Science 84 ORGANIsaTION Recollections of the Manhattan Project 42 Young Scientists 23 Roy Glauber’s historic perspective AAAS Annual
    [Show full text]
  • S/2011/2/Rev.2
    United Nations S/2011/2/Rev.2 Security Council Distr.: General 30 June 2011 Original: English Note by the President of the Security Council Pursuant to paragraph 4 (b) of the note by the President of the Security Council dated 30 October 1998 (S/1998/1016), and after consultations among the members of the Council, it was agreed to elect the Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen of subsidiary bodies for the period ending 31 December 2011 as follows: Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 751 (1992) and 1907 (2009) concerning Somalia and Eritrea Chairman: Hardeep Singh Puri (India) Vice-Chairmen: Lebanon and Nigeria Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) concerning Al-Qaida and associated individuals and entities1 Chairman: Peter Wittig (Germany) Vice-Chairmen: Brazil and Russian Federation Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1373 (2001) concerning counter-terrorism Chairman: Hardeep Singh Puri (India) Vice-Chairmen: France, Gabon and Russian Federation Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1518 (2003) Chairman: U. Joy Ogwu (Nigeria) Vice-Chairman: India __________________ 1 The name of the Committee was amended by the Security Council on 30 June 2011. 11-39807 (E) 010711 *1139807* S/2011/2/Rev.2 Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia Chairman: Nawaf Salam (Lebanon) Vice-Chairmen: Portugal and South Africa Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1533 (2004) concerning the
    [Show full text]
  • Germany's 2013 Election: Shaping the Future?
    Germany’s 2013 election: shaping the future? RESEARCH PAPER 13/73 17 December 2013 Where is Germany – the most influential country in Europe – heading, under its new grand coalition government? Following Germany’s September 2013 elections, Chancellor Merkel returns for a third term in office, personally hugely popular and with her centre-right CDU/CSU's best result for years. But because her favoured coalition partners, the FDP, were ousted from the Bundestag for the first time, she has had to negotiate a grand coalition with the centre-left SPD. The coalition agreement includes SPD polices on some social issues such as a national minimum wage, but the CDU/CSU has kept its tax and eurozone policies. There is a high level of consensus between the coalition partners over foreign and defence policy. What will the effect of the minimum wage be? What will Germany do if the eurozone crisis flares up again? Will Germany take a stronger lead in Europe or internationally? Will the grand coalition and/or Merkel see out their term of office, and how might the parties fare in the next elections in 2017? Arabella Lang Recent Research Papers 13/63 Unemployment by Constituency, November 2013 13.11.13 13/64 CAP reform 2014-2020: EU Agreement and Implementation in the UK and 20.11.13 in Ireland 13/65 Women in Parliament: making a difference since 1918 18.11.13 13/66 Mesothelioma Bill [HL] [Bill 100 of 2013-14] 18.11.13 13/67 Water Bill [Bill 82 of 2013-14] 21.11.13 13/68 Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Bill: Committee Stage Report 25.11.13 13/69
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis · Order · Europe
    CRISIS · ORDER · EUROPE CRISIS · ORDER · EUROPE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 ­A FRESH LOOK AT FOREIGN POLICY 5 “Crisis, Order, Europe” – On Germany’s Foreign Policy Priorities and Responsibilities 14 The Story of the “Review 2014” Logo – Seeing the World through Different Eyes 16 An Experiment in Openness: Steinmeier’s Review Year 18 THE EXPERTS 19 The Experts’ Debate: Challenges to German Foreign Policy 20 Germany’s Role – Strategy and Transparency 22 The “Review 2014” Experts 24 Leadership in and through Europe 26 Körber Foundation Survey: Major Scepticism and High Expectations 28 THE PUBLIC 29 Conversation with the Public: More Openness, More Debate 31 Shades of Grey in Diplomacy: “How would you decide?” 32 Essay Competition: Innovative and Demanding Students 34 The “Review 2014” Events 3 36 THE FEDERAL FOREIGN OFFICE 37 Diplomats in a Fishbowl 38 Ideas Workshop 40 Online Discussions 42 CONCLUSIONS 43 Reality meets “Review 2014” 44 For a Better Foreign Policy 48 DOCUMENTATION 50 Our Experts 52 Our Events 54 Our Partners 56 Publication Data A FRESH LOOK AT FOREIGN POLICY 5 “CRISIS, ORDER, EUROPE” · ON GERMANY’S FOREIGN POLICY PRIORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (BY FOREIGN MINISTER FRANK-WALTER STEINMEIER ) I had decided to pursue a process of self- the right thing; it is also about the ways and examination regarding the prospects of means, the right strategy and suitable instru- German foreign policy when I took on the ments for attaining the goals we have set for position of German Foreign Minister for the ourselves. This process often involves difficult second time in December 2013. We launched trade-offs and situations that are not black- this process exactly a year ago, in February and-white, but rather require choosing among 2014, when we introduced the project “Review several unsatisfactory options.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany's Role in the World
    GERMANY’S ROLE IN THE WORLD The recommendations of the Digital Citizens’ Assembly 13 January to 20 February 2021 Citizens’ Report: Germany’s Role in the World Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The Citizens’ Assembly on Germany’s Role in the World was held under the patronage of the President of the German Bundestag, Dr Wolfgang Schäuble. It is not possible to overestimate the appreciation for citizens that this expresses. We would like to express our sincere thanks for his dedicated advocacy of the Citizens’ Assembly. As chairperson, Marianne Birthler, a former citizens’ rights activist, has accompanied the Cit- izens’ Assembly participants on their journey and encouraged them to get more involved in politics. We thank her for the practical and people-oriented support. Organizing a nationwide Citizens’ Assembly requires considerable resources. In total the process cost about 1.85 million euros. The choice for the theme “Germany’s Role in the World” reflected a wish from politics, but the Citizens’ Assembly was initiated and financed entirely by civil society. Our thanks go to the: n ●●Robert Bosch Stiftung 3 n ●●GLS Treuhand n ●●Open Society Foundations n ●●Schöpflin Foundation n ●●Stiftung Mercator n ●●ZEIT-Stiftung n ●●Volkswagen Foundation (Evaluation) n ●●and other private donors. Without the commitment of Mehr Demokratie e.V. and the initiative Es geht LOS, this Citizens’ Assembly could not have taken place. For this and for the practical support on more issues than we could list here, we thank the whole team: Johannes Alber, Organization
    [Show full text]