DOCSLIB.ORG

PEV's Macquarie River & South

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PEV's Macquarie River & South DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, WATER and ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS for TASMANIAN SURFACE WATERS MACQUARIE RIVER & SOUTH ESK RIVER CATCHMENTS May 2000 Environmental Management Goals for Tasmanian Surface Waters: Macquarie River and South Esk River Catchments. This discussion paper was used as the basis for community and stakeholder participation in the process of developing environmental management objectives for the waterways that are located within the Macquarie River and South Esk River Catchments *. It has been prepared by the Division of Environment and Planning, the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service, and the Land and Water Management Branch, of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment; Northern Midlands, Break O’Day and Central Highlands Councils. Words and expressions used in this discussion paper have, unless the contrary intention appears, the same meaning as defined in the State Policy on Water Quality Management 1997 and the Environmental Management and Pollution Control Act 1994. Ecosystem refers to physical, chemical and biological aspects of the aquatic environment. * Catchment areas not covered in this paper are the Macquarie River catchment downstream of the Macquarie River junction with Brumbys Creek; areas of the upper Macquarie catchment within the Southern Midlands Municipality; and the South Esk River catchment below the South Esk River junction with the Macquarie River. For further information on these areas refer to the Public Discussion Papers: Proposed Environmental Management Goals for Tasmanian Surface Waters - Great Lake & Brumbys Creek Catchments, Lower Macquarie and South Esk Rivers and Proposed Environmental Management Goals for Tasmanian Surface Waters – Southern Midlands Catchments. 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................5 1.1 WHY DO WE NEED WATER REFORM?.........................................................................5 1.2 WHAT ARE THESE REFORMS?...................................................................................5 1.3 WHAT WILL COMMUNITY INPUT ACHIEVE?.................................................................6 1.4 WHAT INFORMATION DID WE RECEIVE FROM THE COMMUNITY?..................................6 1.5 HOW WILL YOUR INPUT BE USED?............................................................................6 2 MACQUARIE RIVER CATCHMENT OVERVIEW..........................................................8 2.1 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................8 2.2 WATER USAGE .......................................................................................................9 2.3 WATER QUALITY....................................................................................................10 2.4 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS .........................................................................................12 2.5 CATCHMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ....................................................................12 3 SOUTH ESK RIVER CATCHMENT OVERVIEW........................................................13 3.1 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................13 3.2 WATER USAGE .....................................................................................................14 3.3 WATER QUALITY....................................................................................................15 3.4 AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS ........................................................................................16 3.5 CATCHMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ....................................................................17 4 WATER QUALITY: PROTECTED ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES.................................19 4.1 SETTING PROTECTED ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES.....................................................19 4.2 PROTECTED ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES CATEGORIES...............................................19 5 PROTECTED ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES FOR THE MACQUARIE RIVER & SOUTH ESK RIVER CATCHMENTS..............................................................................................21 5.1 PEV SETTING PROCESS........................................................................................21 6 WATER QUANTITY VALUES FOR THE MACQUARIE RIVER & SOUTH ESK RIVER 31 6.1 OVERVIEW............................................................................................................31 6.2 WATER QUANTITY VALUES .....................................................................................31 7 COMMUNITY WATER VALUES................................................................................33 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Why do we need water reform? 1.2 What are these reforms? A good supply of fresh, clean water is Two major aspects of the water reforms an essential requirement for human life, are water quality management and water a healthy environment and a productive quantity management. economy. (a) water quality management We need it for drinking, for recreational activities like fishing, swimming and The State Policy on Water Quality boating, to provide the food we eat and Management 1997 is designed to export, to generate clean electricity, and maintain or enhance the quality of to support mining and other industries. Tasmanian surface waters. Principal objectives of the Policy include: We also expect our rivers and lakes to look healthy, and provide a healthy · Move on from reliance on ‘end of environment for a wide range of aquatic pipe’ controls to take into plants and animals. consideration the number of discharges into a given water body, We take for granted that our use of or the sensitivity or current water resources is sustainable; that our condition of the water body. hard-working water will still be there in a healthy state to provide the same · Ensure that diffuse source and point benefits for future generations. source pollution does not endanger the achievement of water quality Tasmanian rivers range from relatively objectives and that pollutants short, swiftly flowing rivers fed from discharged to waterways are reduced mountain sources to slowly flowing as much as possible using rivers which may be reduced to a series environmental best practice. of pools during dry periods. Our waterways are not immune from · Facilitate and promote integrated problems, however, and many of our catchment management. river systems are showing signs of stress. · Focusing on overall water quality management strategies by River health, and the health of the identifying those water quality economies that depend upon them, is values and uses which are clearly linked to the way we use the considered worthy of protection. waters; the degree of regulation we impose; the quantity of water we take The first purpose of this discussion out; and the quality of water we return. paper was to explain the Policy and how the environmental values will be In response to a general recognition identified and used. Local communities across the community of the importance have a key role in identifying these of having clean water and appropriate values in their areas. river flows, the Tasmanian Government is currently finalising a range of reforms (b) water quantity management designed to ensure that these values are protected for the future of the State. The recent introduction of the Water § What uses or values do you have for Management Act 1999 to replace the surface waters in this area that rely Water Act 1957 provides for: upon maintaining or enhancing water quality? · major changes to the institutional § Which of your activities rely upon arrangements for water management; maintaining or enhancing the flow of · the ready transfer of water rights water into catchment waterways? between different users; § Are there certain places on your rivers that you traditionally use for · enhanced stakeholder and community swimming or other recreational input into water allocation and activities? management; and § Do you fish in them? · a more transparent and equitable § Are there specific features of your water allocation system, including rivers and streams that are formal allocation of flows to maintain recognized scenic attractions, such a healthy river environment. as rapids or waterfalls? The second purpose of this discussion § Do you use water for livestock paper was to encourage community watering? involvement in ensuring sustainable use § Do you know of rare or endangered of our water resources by identifying animals or plants in, or adjacent to, water quantity values for selected specific areas of your rivers or catchments. These values will of streams? assistance to the Department in § Does your river supply the local undertaking water quantity planning in town water supply? your catchment. § Do you draw water from it to 1.3 What will community input irrigate your farm? achieve? Answers to these questions were recorded as ‘Community Water Values’ The objective is to identify water and are summarised in Section 7. management goals for the catchments within your region. These water Planning to ensure sustainable use of management goals will include Protected these waters and protection of river Environmental Values (PEVs) as defined health requires sound knowledge of local under the State Policy on Water Quality water quality and quantity issues. Management and identified water Community input to this process is quantity values. important. Many of the community water values
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Management Plan Meeti
    Water Management Planning Report Series Consultative Group Water Resources Information Package for the South Esk Catchment (above Macquarie) Water Management Plan Meeting Two August 2008 Water Resources Information Package for the South Esk River Catchment Water Management Plan Copyright Notice Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries and Water, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer Whilst DPIW has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries and Water, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation DPIW (2008). Water Resources Information Package for the South Esk catchment (above Macquarie) Water Management Plan Technical Report No. WMP 08/03. Water Resources Division, Department of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart. The Department of Primary Industries and Water (DPIW) The Department of Primary Industries and Water provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing Statement for Epacris Exserta (South Esk Heath) Ep Acris Exserta
    Listing Statement for Epacris exserta (south esk heath) Ep acris exserta south esk heath T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T Image by Oberon Carter Scientific name: Epacris exserta R. Br., Prodr. 551 (1810) Common name: south esk heath (Wapstra et al. 2005) Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Epacridaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 : endangered Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 : Endangered Distribution: Endemic status: Endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM Region: North Figure 1 . The distribution of Epacris exserta Plate 1. Epacris exserta : flower detail (image by Oberon Carter) 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Epacris exserta (south esk heath) IDENTIFICATION AND ECOLOGY [description from Crowden 2003] Epacris exserta is a woody shrub in the Epacridaceae family. It is a riparian species up Taxonomic issues to 1.5 m tall that is restricted to three rivers in The taxon referred to as Epacris exserta in the Tasmania’s north. Epacris exserta is best Recovery Plan – Tasmanian Forest Epacrids 1999– identified during its flowering period, 2004 (Keith 1998) consisted of ten September to late October. subpopulations in the north of the State. Epacris Known pollinators of Epacris taxa include a exserta as understood here ( sensu Crowden variety of adult carrion flies from the families 2003), includes only three of those Tabanidae, Muscidae and Calliphoridae (Keith subpopulations, the remainder being 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS for TASMANIAN SURFACE WATERS
    DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, WATER and ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS for TASMANIAN SURFACE WATERS MACQUARIE RIVER & SOUTH ESK RIVER CATCHMENTS FINAL PAPER December 2005 Environmental Management Goals for Tasmanian Surface Waters: MACQUARIE RIVER AND SOUTH ESK RIVER CATCHMENTS. Between 2000 and 2004 Protected This final paper is divided into six Environmental Values (PEVS) were main sections: set for the Macquarie River and South Esk River catchments. A discussion • The first part describes water paper was prepared to facilitate public reforms in general. participation in setting the PEVs. This discussion paper was intended as • The second and third parts provide a a basis for community and brief description of the Macquarie stakeholder participation in the River and South Esk River process of developing environmental catchments. management goals for the waterways that are located within the Macquarie • Part four discusses the State Policy River and South Esk River on Water Quality Management. catchments. * • The final Protected Environmental Values for the Macquarie River and The discussion paper has been South Esk River catchments are modified into its current form to reflect shown in part five. that the process for the Macquarie River and South Esk River catchments • Water quantity values are discussed is now complete. It is considered, in part six, and however, that much of the information included in the discussion paper should • Part seven lists the community water remain as a record of the PEV setting values for the catchments. process. This paper has been prepared by the Department of Primary Industries, * N.B. : Catchment areas not covered in Water and Environment in this paper are the Macquarie River conjunction with the Tasmanian Parks catchment downstream of the Macquarie and Wildlife Service Northern River junction with Brumbys Creek; Midlands, Break O’ Day and Central areas of the upper Macquarie catchment Highlands Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • South Esk Basin State of Rivers Report
    SOUTH ESK BASIN STATE OF RIVERS REPORT A Technical document presenting data collected during a study of rivers of the South Esk, Meander and Macquarie catchments during the period 1992 - 1995. Authors; Chris Bobbi David Fuller David Oldmeadow Resource Assessment Branch, Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries. GPO Box 192 B Hobart, TAS. 7001 This study was jointly funded by the National Landcare Program and the Tasmanian State Government 1996 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIF has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation: DPIF (1996) South Esk Basin State of Rivers Report. Resource Assessment Branch, Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania's River Geomorphology
    Tasmania’s river geomorphology: stream character and regional analysis. Volume 1 Kathryn Jerie, Ian Houshold and David Peters Nature Conservation Report 03/5 Nature Conservation Branch, DPIWE June 2003 Cover Photos: Top: James River on the Central Plateau. Bottom left: Vanishing Falls on the Salisbury River, southern Tasmania (photo by Rolan Eberhard). Bottom right: Sorrel River, south of Macquarie Harbour. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank many people for support and advice on many diverse topics during the course of this project, including: Damon Telfer, Emma Watt, Fiona Wells, Geoff Peters, Guy Lampert, Helen Locher, Helen Morgan, Jason Bradbury, John Ashworth, John Corbett, John Gooderham, Kath Sund, Lee Drummond, Leon Barmuta, Matt Brook, Mike Askey-Doran, Mike Pemberton, Mike Temple- Smith, Penny Wells, Peter Cale, Sharon Cunial, Simon Pigot, and Wengui Su. In particular, we would like to thank Chris Sharples for extensive advice on the influence of geology on geomorphology in Tasmania, and many discussions on this and other useful topics. For the use of river characterisation data, we wish to thank: Guy Lampert, Damon Telfer, Peter Stronach, Daniel Sprod, and Andy Baird. We thank Chris Sharples, Rolan Eberhard and Jason Bradbury for the use of photographs. This project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust. ISSN No. 1441 0680 i Table of Contents Volume 1 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... i Table of Contents .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion Surfaces, River Terraces, and River Capture in the Launceston Tertiary Basin
    PAPERS AND PROCEElDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, VOLUME 94 EROSION SURFACES, RIVER TERRACES, AND RIVER CAPTURE IN THE LAUNCESTON TERTIARY BASIN By K. D. NICOLLS C.S.I.R.O. Division of Soils, Hobart. (With 2 plates and 2 text figures). ABSTRACT quently a study of geOmOrphDlogy has been made in an attempt to explain the pattern of soils and An erosion surface probably of Pliocene age, to' throw light on their genesis, because the history extends throughout the Launceston Tertiary. Basin of the landscapes is also the history of the soils. at elevations between 550 and 1050 feet and IS here The study ShDWS that the floor of the Basin is a named the Woodstock Surface. It slopes gently stepped landscape, throughout which may be eastwards from Deloraine and north-westwards traced a sequence of distinct levels, each with from Tunbridge and is developed across Tertiary characteristic soils. Soil maps of the Longford sediments, dolerite and basalt. Later~tic podzolic and Quamby rectangles are available (Nicolls, soils are typical of it on the sedIments, a!ld 1958a, 1959) and this paper is to be read in con­ lateritic krasnozems with outcrops of laterIte junction with them. (bauxite) on the dolerite and basalt. It is :l possible time marker, younger than the basalts at Johnston (1873) to whom the name Launceston Deloraine-Westbury and at Campbell Town but of Tertiary Basin is due, believed that the Tertiary uncertain relationship to the basalt at Evandale. sediments were deposited in a large lake, and Carey (1946) follows this. However, the nature Several gently sloping surfaces can be recognised of the sediments and the absence of remnants of at levels below the Woodstock.
    [Show full text]
  • Meander River Catchment Water Management Statement
    Meander River Catchment Water Management Statement June 2016 Water and Marine Resources Division Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Copyright Notice Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer Whilst the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation DPIPWE (2016). Meander River Catchment Water Management Statement. Water and Marine Resources Division, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotectonics
    ANZGG 13th conference in Tassie! The New River basin, south coast - pristine fluvial, karst, coastal, glacial and periglacial geomorphology Grant Dixon A selection of Taswegian geomorphologia Queenstown and surrounds The 13th ANZGG conference will be held in Queenstown, in the rugged hinterland of the west coast. For further information and to register your expression of interest to attend, follow this link: Tasmanian landforms - Glacial erosion B A Spectacular erosional landforms have developed as a result of late Cainozoic glaciation on multiple occasions. Distinctive mountain landforms have developed on columnar dolerite substrates (Cradle Mountain – A) and quartz-rich metamorphics (Schnells Ridge – B and Western Arthur Range – C). Ice cap glaciation of massive dolerite sills has left a profusion of shallow tarns across the state’s central plateau D C Glacial deposition Moraines related to multiple late Cainozoic glacial periods are found in lowland settings in the centre and west of the state (Lake Judd – A, Federation Peak – B. Weathering rind thickness has been used to assign relative ages to these deposits (Conglomerate Creek – c). Glacial outwash deposits dammed Lake Pedder – its landforms survive intact below the Huon- A Serpentine impoundment (D). B C D Periglacial systems Active periglacial systems are found on the higher peaks (Nevada Peak – A) and frost hollows in plateau areas (Liaweenee Moor – B). Extensive relict blockstreams encircle the higher dolerite peaks of central and NE Tasmania (Western Bluff – C, Ben Lomond Plateau, D). C B A D Coastal systems On the hard rock coasts of Tasman Peninsula are found Austalia’s highest sea-cliffs –(Cape Pillar – B).
    [Show full text]
  • A Compilation of Place Names and Their Histories in Tasmania
    LA TROBE: Renamed Latrobe. LACHLAN: A small farming district 6 Km. south of New Norfolk. It is on the Lachlan Road, which runs beside a river of the same name. Sir John Franklin, in 1837, founded the settlement, and used the christian name of Governor Macquarie for the township. LACKRANA: A small rural settlement on Flinders Island. It is 10 Km. due east of Whitemark, over the Darling Range. A district noted for its dairy produce, it is also the centre of the Lackrana Wildlife Sanctuary. LADY BARRON: The main southern town on Flinders Island, 24 Km. south ofWhitemark. Situated in Adelaide Bay, it was named in honour of the wife of a Governor of Tasmania Sir Harry Barron. Places with names, which are very similar often, created confusion. LADY BAY: A small bay on the southern end of DEntrecasteaux Channel, 6 Km. east of Southport. It is almost deserted now except for a few holiday shacks. It was once an important port for the timber industry but there is very little of the wharf today. It has also been known as Lady's Bay. LADY NELSON CREEK: A small creek on the southern side of Dilston, it joins with Coldwater Creek and becomes a tributary of the Tamar River. The creek rises inland, near Underwood, and flows through some good farming country. It was an important freshwater supply in the early days of the colony. LAGOONS: An alternative name for Chain of Lagoons. It is 17 Km. south ofSt.Marys on the Tasman Highway. A geographical description of the inlet, which is named Saltwater Inlet, when the tide goes out it, leaves a "chain of lagoons".
    [Show full text]
  • North-East Rivers Environmental Review: a Review of Tasmanian Environmental Quality Data to 2001
    supervising scientist report 168 North-east rivers environmental review A review of Tasmanian environmental quality data to 2001 Lois Koehnken supervising scientist This report was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust, a Commonwealth initiative to improve Australia’s environment, as part of the RiverWorks Tasmania program. RiverWorks Tasmania is a joint program managed by the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment and the Commonwealth Supervising Scientist Division to improve the environmental quality of Tasmanian estuaries. The primary objectives of RiverWorks Tasmania are: • to undertake a series of capital works projects designed to reduce or remove significant historical sources of pollution; • to invest in mechanisms that will provide for sustainable environmental improvement, beyond the completion of the capital works program; • to develop proactical and innovative mechanisms for improving environmental conditions which can be transferred to other areas of Tasmania and other Australian States; • to produce public education/information materials. For further information about this report please contact the Program Manager, RiverWorks, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44, Hobart 7001. L Koehnken – Technical Advice on Water, 104 Forest Rd, West Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia. This report has been published in the Supervising Scientist Report series and should be cited as follows: Koehnken L 2001. North-east rivers environmental review: A review of Tasmanian environmental quality data to 2001. Supervising Scientist Report 168, Supervising Scientist, Darwin. The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage. © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24374 3 This work is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • South Esk River and Macquarie River Flood Data Book
    SOUTH ESK RIVER AND MACQUARIE RIVER FLOOD DATA BOOK Land and Water Management Branch Resource Management and Conservation Division June 2000 South Esk River Flood Data Book This Book Forms a Part of the Requirements for Emergency Management Australia Reporting Liza Fallon David Fuller Bryce Graham Land and Water Management Branch Resource Management and Conservation Division. Report Series WRA 00/03 June 2000. Emergency Management Australia South Esk River Flood Data Book TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY 4 ACRONYMS 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 Flood Data Books 6 Data Sources 6 2. THE ENVIRONMENT 7 Catchments and Drainage Systems 7 Climate and Rainfall 7 3. FLOODING OF THE SOUTH ESK AND MACQUARIE RIVERS 9 4. FLOOD ANALYSIS 15 5. RECORDS OF FLOODING 18 6. NEW RECORDS OF FLOODING 38 REFERENCES 39 PLATES Cover Plate: May 1986 – Flooding of the South Esk River at Longford. Plate 1: Pre 1870 – The Macquarie River at Woolmers Estate near Longford. Plate 2: April 1929 – The Macquarie River at Woolmers Estate near Longford. Plate 3: April 1929 – Floodwaters rising above the Stationmaster’s house at Evandale. Plate 4: April 1929 – Floodwaters under the Gorge Bridge at Launceston. Plate 5: April 1929 – Floodwaters around the Tamar Rowing Sheds at Launceston. Plate 6: Pre 1929 – The Perth Bridge before it was destroyed in the 1929 flood. Plate 7: April 1929 – Floodwaters rising up the piers of the Perth Bridge. Plate 8: April 1929 – The flood peak and the Perth Bridge. Plate 9: April 1929 – The remains of the Perth Bridge after the 1929 flood. Plate 10: May 1969 – Flooding at the Rhodes property near Longford.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Aboriginal Place Names
    TASMANIAN ABORIGINAL PLACE NAMES N.J.B. Plomley Honorary Research Associate Queen Victoria Museum & Art Gallery With the assistance of Caroline Goodall Queen Victoria Museum & Art Gallery N.J.B. Plomley Tasmanian Aboriginal Place Names Occasional Paper No.3 Queen Victoria Museum & Art Gallery Tasmania Cover design taken from Aboriginal rock-carvings at Marrawah, NW Tasmania. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 ABORIGINAL PLACE NAMES 5 INDEX 96 BIBLIOGRAPHY 98 3 INTRODUCTION Although it has been possible to assemble about seven hundred names given to places in Tasmania by the Aborigines, mostly from the journals and other records of George Augustus Robinson, few of them have been applied to the same place by the settlers who later renamed places in Tasmania according to their own whims. This situation is unlike that found in most other regions of Australia, where there is a sprinkling of Aboriginal names among the settlers' names, which are usually those of British places and people. The paucity of Aboriginal place names in TasmaniCi was, in fact, commented upon many years ago, when the Sydney Colonist of 14 April, 1838, remarked ­ Whereas every district of New South Wales is quite studded with native names, yet in Van Diemen's Land the Editor "could not find after diligent enquiry, that a single locality in all Van Diemen's Land is known to the colonist by its ancient native name, or is even known to have had a native name at all. The ancient Celts and Britons left ten thousand aboriginal names of places in England and Scotland when they were nearly exterminated in the low countries and driven to the mountains of Scotland and Wales by our forefathers the Saxons.
    [Show full text]