DOCSLIB.ORG

Hairi Yazdi, Universal Science, an Introduction to Islamic Metaphysics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hairi Yazdi, Universal Science, an Introduction to Islamic Metaphysics Universal Science: An Introduction to Islamic Metaphysics The Modern Shīʿah Library Series Editors Sayyid Amjad H. Shah Naqavi (The Shīʿah Institute) Sayyid Sajjad H. Rizvi (University of Exeter) Editorial Advisory Board Ali Ansari (University of St Andrews) Rainer Brunner (Centre national de la recherche scientifique) Faisal Devji (University of Oxford) Robert Gleave (University of Exeter) Sabrina Mervin (École des hautes études en sciences sociales) volume 2 THE S HI AH INS TITUTE The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/msl Universal Science: An Introduction to Islamic Metaphysics By Mahdī Ḥāʾirī Yazdī (d. 1420 ah/1999) Translated by John Cooper (d. 1997) Edited and Introduced by Saiyad Nizamuddin Ahmad leiden | boston Library of Congress Control Number: 2017936105 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 2405-8092 isbn 978-90-04-34302-3 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-34334-4 (paperback) isbn 978-90-04-34311-5 (e-book) Copyright 2017 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill nv incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill nv provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, ma 01923, usa. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper and produced in a sustainable manner. To the friends of the Shīʿah Institute ∵ Contents Foreword xi Editor’s Introduction 1 1 Mahdī Ḥāʾirī Yazdī: A Philosophical Life 2 2 John Cooper: Oxford, Qum, and Cambridge 12 3 The Translation 16 4 ʿIlm-i kullī: Historical Context and Content 17 Universal Science: An Introduction to Islamic Metaphysics 47 Preface 49 1 Introduction 57 1 The Definition of Metaphysics 57 2 The Central Subject-Matter of Metaphysics 59 3 The Divisions of Philosophy 61 4 Metaphysics in the General Sense 62 2 Existence (wujūd)–Being (hastī) 63 1 The Meaning of Existence 63 2 That Which Makes Existence Known is Neither a Real Definition Nor a Descriptive Definition 64 3 Which is Fundamentally Real: Existence or Quiddity? 64 4 The Definition of Quiddity 64 5 Arguments for the Fundamentality of Existence 65 6 The Concept of Existence 69 7 The Reality of Existence 74 8 Existence is in Addition to Quiddity 78 9 Truth (God, the Exalted) is Pure Existence 80 10 Mental Existence (or Existence in the Mind) 82 3 Mental Existence 86 1 The Enigma of Mental Existence 86 2 The Solution to the Enigma 87 3 The View of Ṣadr al-Dīn Shīrāzī 90 4 Unity of the Intellector and That Which is Intellected 94 viii contents 4 Further Issues Relating to Existence 97 1 Existence is Absolute Good 97 2 Existence is a Singularly Unique Reality 101 3 Existence is Not Substance and is Not Accident 102 4 Existence is Not Compound 103 5 Absolute Existence and Determined Existence 103 6 The Secondary Intelligible 106 7 A Non-Existent is Not Anything 108 8 There is No Differentiation between Non-Existences, or Any Causal Relationship 110 9 The Coming Back of What Has Become Non-Existent 111 10 History Does Not Repeat Itself 114 11 Making and Effecting 115 12 The Three Modes of Existence 118 5 Contingency (imkān) 121 1 General Contingency 121 2 Specific Contingency 121 3 Most Specific Contingency 122 4 Future Contingency 122 5 Pre-Dispositional Contingency 123 6 Contingency of Occurrence 123 7 Contingency in the Sense of Likelihood 124 8 Indigent Contingency 124 9 Analogical Contingency 125 6 Priority and Posteriority 126 1 Coming-Into-Being and Eternity 126 2 The Divisions of Priority and Posteriority 130 7 Unity, Multiplicity, and Predication 132 1 Unity and Multiplicity 132 2 Divisions of the One [That is to say an investigation into how many ways things are said to be ‘one’] 135 3 Predication 137 4 Division of Predication 137 5 Multiplicity, Alterity, and Opposition 141 8 Quiddity 144 1 Quiddity and Its Necessary Parts 144 2 Quiddity in Itself is Neither Existent Nor Non-Existent 146 contents ix 3 Mental Conceptions of Quiddity 147 4 The Natural Universal 149 5 Existence of the Natural Universal 149 9 Potentiality (quwwah) and Actuality ( fiʿl) 153 10 Cause (ʿillat) and Effect (maʿlūl) 155 1 Causality 155 2 The Divisions of the Efficient Cause 156 3 The Final Cause 159 4 Premature Death 163 5 The Formal Cause 164 6 The Material Cause 165 7 The Names for Matter 166 8 The Divisions of Matter 166 9 Things in Common between all the Causes 169 10 Some of the Properties of the Bodily Causes 169 11 Things in Common between the Cause and the Effect 170 12 A Discussion between Men of Wisdom 175 13 Vicious Circles and Infinite Regresses 180 Appendix 185 Bibliography 188 Index 197 Foreword It is a great privilege to present the second volume in The Modern Shīʿah Li- brary, ‘Universal Science: An Introduction to Islamic Metaphysics’ (ʿIlm-i kullī), the first singly authored work by Mahdī Ḥāʾirī Yazdī (d. 1420 ah/1999), translat- ed here into English by John Cooper (d. 1997). This is the first of Yazdī’s several influential works on philosophy, jurisprudence, and political theory, to have been translated from Persian into English—and only the second to have been published in the West. Its author, Mahdī Ḥāʾirī Yazdī was born into a schol- arly family, son of the founder of the Islamic Seminary at Qum—one of the main loci of Shīʿī intellectual activity—Shaykh ʿAbd al-Karīm Ḥāʾirī Yazdī. He studied jurisprudence, philosophy, the ‘rational sciences’, and astronomy with many of the leading intellectual authorities of his day—including Āyatullāh al-Sayyid Aḥmad Khwānsārī (d. 1406 ah/1985) and Āyatullāh Rūḥ Allāh Khu- maynī (d. 1409 ah/1989)—before going on to teach at the University of Tehran. The work before you was written in the 1950s amidst a period of great political turbulence in Tehran, which coincided with a crossroads in the life of its au- thor; who soon after chose to leave Iran for the United States, where, having already developed a thorough grounding in Islamic philosophy, he then spent many years studying the Western philosophical canon and contemporary an- alytic philosophy at the Universities of Michigan and Toronto, respectively. He later went on to teach at Oxford, Yale, and McGill Universities; making Mahdī Ḥāʾirī Yazdī almost unique in his ability to navigate both the worlds of Islamic and Western philosophy. The Universal Science itself is an introduction to ‘metaphysics proper’; originally conceived as the first part of a trilogy that would go on to elaborate on both ‘theology proper’ and psychology. As an introduction it is remarka- ble both for its sheer philosophical breadth and for its clarity of exposition, and as such it serves as a fitting riposte to the still-prevalent Orientalist sup- position that ‘Islamic Philosophy’ reached its peak in the mediæval period and has hitherto been in decline. This edition of John Cooper’s translation therefore provides Western academia with a rare, but exemplary, insight into the ‘living tradition’ of Islamic philosophy as it continues to be practiced today in the Shīʿī seminaries of Najaf and Qum; a metaphysical–theologi- cal and epistemological discipline that has been transmitted continuously for the best part of a thousand years, which is concerned with examining matters of causality, existence, knowledge, and quiddity as these pertain to an understanding of the Divine. Although the permit of the Universal Science is often recondite in nature, the accessibility of its prose and the abun- dance of examples with which its author seeks to illuminate and invigorate xii Foreword the arguments of previous philosophical schools and authorities (Sadrian, Illuminationist, Peripatetic, and Avicennan), are qualities that have seen it utilised as a philosophical textbook for many years at the University of Tehran. Thus this translation will provide a guide through Islamic metaphys- ics for undergraduate students and scholars alike. A note of thanks is here due to the friends of the Shīʿah Institute, for their support, to Brill, for their commitment to this series, and to my dear colleagues, here at the Shīʿah Institute, namely, Aun, George, Mohammed, Nizam, and Sajjad, without whose indelible efforts and collective endeavour this work would still have remained a neglected draft of handwritten notes, queries, and untranslated passages amongst John Cooper's papers. It is our hope that the Universal Science will be of special interest to aca- demics in Islamic Studies and to philosophers seeking to understand and explore the shared philosophical heritage of the Western and Islamic worlds. خ ���خ��د�ہ ��ش�� ��دا خ ی ِر Sayyid Amjad H. Shah Naqavi Series Editor, The Modern Shīʿah Library The Shīʿah Institute Bloomsbury, London 17 Rabīʿ al-Awwal 1438/17 December 2016 Editor’s Introduction Philosophy is the foundation of all sciences. It is the universal science (ʿilm-i kullī). Without philosophy no other science can be established (banā kard)…Philosophy is the ontology of any reality (ḥaqīqat). For ex- ample, the reality (ḥaqīqat) of man. If you put philosophy to one side, you have put man aside. Because man is a rational and perceiving animal… the perceiver of ‘reality’. Āyatullāh Mahdī Ḥāʾirī Yazdī (d. 1420 ah/1999)1 These observations on the centrality of philosophy in the human experience, by the author of ʿIlm-i kullī, are redolent with the wisdom of the living Islamic philosophical tradition, a tradition which survives in all its fullness into our own times only among the Shīʿah.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Duns Scotus on the Common Nature and the Individual Differentia
    c Peter King, Philosophical Topics 20 (1992), 50–76 DUNS SCOTUS ON THE COMMON NATURE* Introduction COTUS holds that in each individual there is a principle that accounts for its being the very thing it is and a formally S distinct principle that accounts for its being the kind of thing it is; the former is its individual differentia, the latter its common nature.1 These two principles are not on a par: the common nature is prior to the individual differentia, both independent of it and indifferent to it. When the individual differentia is combined with the common nature, the result is a concrete individual that really differs from all else and really agrees with others of the same kind. The individual differentia and the common nature thereby explain what Scotus takes to stand in need of explanation: the indi- viduality of Socrates on the one hand, the commonalities between Socrates * An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 26th International Congress on Medieval Studies, sponsored by the Medieval Institute, held at Western Michigan University 9–12 May 1991. All translations are my own. Scotus’s writings may be found in the following editions: (1) Vaticana: Iohannis Duns Scoti Doctoris Subtilis et Mariani opera omnia, ed. P. Carolus Bali¸cet alii, Typis Polyglottis Vaticanae 1950– Vols. I–VII, XVI–XVIII. (2) Wadding-Viv`es: Joannis Duns Scoti Doctoris Subtilis Ordinis Minorum opera omnia, ed. Luke Wadding, Lyon 1639; republished, with only slight alterations, by L. Viv`es,Paris 1891–1895. Vols. I–XXVI. References are to the Vatican edition wherever possible, to the Wadding-Viv`esedition otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • René Descartes: Father of Modern Philosophy and Scholasticism
    René Descartes: Father of Modern Philosophy and Scholasticism Sarah Venable Course: Philosophy 301 Instructor: Dr. Barbara Forrest Assignment: Research Paper For centuries, the Roman Catholic Church completely dominated European thought. It had become the most powerful ruling force, leaving monarchs susceptible to its control through the threat of excommunication. For the everyday European, contradicting or questioning any aspect of Church doctrine could result in imprisonment, or even death. Scholars were bound by fear to avoid appearing too radical. However, the modern academic need not fear such retribution today. Learning has moved from the control of the Church and has become secularized due in part to the work of such thinkers as Descartes. René Descartes, who was interested in both science and philosophy, introduced his readers to the idea of separating academic knowledge from religious doctrine. He claimed science filled with uncertainty and myth could never promote learning or the advancement of society. Descartes responded to the growing conflict between these two forces with an attempt to bring clarity. He was willing to challenge the accepted ideas of his day and introduce change. Religion had not been separate from science in the past. By philosophy and science using reason as its cornerstone, science effected a substantial increase in knowledge. After a period of widespread illiteracy, Europe began to move forward in education by rediscovering Greek and Roman texts filled with science, mathematics, and philosophy. As time progressed and learning increased, the Church began to loosen its iron grip over the people. Church officials recognized a need to educate people as long as subject material was well controlled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Synergy Between Philosophy and Science, Need of the Contemporary Society
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research ISSN: 2455-2070; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.22 Received: 11-11-2019; Accepted: 12-12-2019 www.socialsciencejournal.in Volume 6; Issue 1; January 2020; Page No. 45-51 The Synergy between Philosophy and Science, need of the contemporary society Kabita Das1*, Biswaranjan Paital2 1 PG Department of Philosophy, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India 2 Redox Regulation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology Bhubaneswar, India Abstract What the world will be like in the foreseeable future is a matter of concern for everyone, no matter how far removed the human is from scientific work, political struggle, or revolutionary moment. What is in store for man: the holocaust of war, or a peaceful life? What will the earth be like? Will nature survive or will it be annihilated as a result of scientific and technical progress? Will oppression and social injustice disappear from the world, or will they persist forever? These are general questions confronting each person living on society. However, is it possible to resolve above and all other social issues by only social science approaches, is the central story of this article. Social science is pre-dominated with predictable analyses while science is empirical. Humanities are academic disciplines that deal with the study on the aspects and issues of human society and culture, whereas, science is a systematic innovativeness that builds and organizes information in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universal phenomena including social issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Sum, Ergo Cogito: Nietzsche Re-Orders Descartes
    Aporia vol. 25 no. 2—2015 Sum, Ergo Cogito: Nietzsche Re-orders Descartes JONAS MONTE I. Introduction ietzsche’s aphorism 276 in The Gay Science addresses Descartes’ epistemological scheme: “I still live, I still think: NI still have to live, for I still have to think. Sum, ergo cogito: cogito, ergo sum” (GS 223). Ironically, Nietzsche inverts the logic in Descartes’ famous statement “Cogito, ergo sum” as a caustic way, yet poetic and stylish, of creating his own statement.1 He then delivers his critique by putting his own version prior to that of Descartes. Here, Nietzsche’s critique can be interpreted as a twofold overlap- ping argument. First, by reversing Descartes’ axiom into “Sum, ergo cogito,” Nietzsche stresses that in fact a social ontology (which includes metaphysical, logical, linguistic, and conceptual elements) has been a condition that makes possible Descartes’ inference of human existence from such pre-established values. Here, Descartes seems not to have applied his methodical doubt completely, since to arrive 1 In light of Nietzsche’s inversion, this paper seeks to analyse Descartes’ Meditation Project, in effect, the cogito as a device in itself. It does not consider the project’s metaphysical background, including the issue of Descartes’ substance dualism. For an introduction to Cartesian dualism, see Justin Skirry, “René Descartes: The Mind-Body Distinction,” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jonas Monte is a senior currently studying in a joint honors program in philosophy and political science at the University of Ottawa, Canada. His primary philosophical interests are ethics, political philosophy, Nietzsche, and early modern philosophy. After graduation, Jonas plans to pursue a PhD in philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Causality Graphs: a Precise Happens-Before Model for Detecting Bugs in Concurrent Programs
    Universal Causality Graphs: A Precise Happens-Before Model for Detecting Bugs in Concurrent Programs Vineet Kahlon and Chao Wang NEC Laboratories America, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA Abstract. Triggering errors in concurrent programs is a notoriously difficult task. A key reason for this is the behavioral complexity resulting from the large number of interleavings of operations of different threads. Efficient static tech- niques, therefore, play a critical role in restricting the set of interleavings that need be explored in greater depth. The goal here is to exploit scheduling con- straints imposed by synchronization primitives to determine whether the property at hand can be violated and report schedules that may lead to such a violation. Towards that end, we propose the new notion of a Universal Causality Graph (UCG) that given a correctness property P , encodes the set of all (statically) fea- sible interleavings that may violate P . UCGs provide a unified happens-before model by capturing causality constraints imposed by the property at hand as well as scheduling constraints imposed by synchronization primitives as causality con- straints. Embedding all these constraints into one common framework allows us to exploit the synergy between the constraints imposed by different synchroniza- tion primitives, as well as between the constraints imposed by the property and the primitives. This often leads to the removal of significantly more redundant in- terleavings than would otherwise be possible. Importantly, it also guarantees both soundness and completeness of our technique for identifying statically feasible interleavings. As an application, we demonstrate the use of UCGs in enhancing the precision and scalability of predictive analysis in the context of runtime veri- fication of concurrent programs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rationality of Plato's Theory of Good and Evil
    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 1979 The Rationality of Plato’s Theory of Good and Evil Allan A. Davis Wilfrid Laurier University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Allan A., "The Rationality of Plato’s Theory of Good and Evil" (1979). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1508. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1508 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT Plato has been called the "father of rational theology." This thesis is an attempt to examine in the light of contemporary Platonic scholarship five of Plato's essentially religious doctrines insofar as they support the idea that Plato's theory of good and evil is rational. Chapters 1 and 2 examine the plausibility of Plato's theory of knowledge. Chapter 3 states briefly his theory of Forms, while Chapter 4 attempts to give this doctrine credence by analysing those aspects of it which seem least convincing. Chapters 5 and 6 consider Plato's theory of soul and conclude that, although some of his beliefs in this area lack credibility, his interpretation of the nature and function of soul is basically plausible. Chapters 7 and 8 examine the rationality of Plato's Idea of the Good. Chapter 9 sketches his notion of balance and proportion and, in conclusion, Chapter 10 attempts to show how this theory provides an underlying credibility not only to all the theories discussed but also to Plato's theory of good and evil in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Universal Schemas for Domain Specific Ontology Expansion
    Applying Universal Schemas for Domain Specific Ontology Expansion Paul Groth, Sujit Pal, Darin McBeath, Brad Allen and Ron Daniel p.groth, sujit.pal, d.mcbeath, b.allen, r.daniel @elsevier.com { Elsevier Labs } 1600 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1800, Philadelphia, PA Abstract domain experts in their ontology maintenance task. We apply these approaches to two unique resources: Manually created large scale ontologies are useful for organizing, searching, and repur- The full text of all 14 million documents (jour- • posing content ranging from scientific papers nal papers and book chapters) within Elsevier’s and medical guidelines to images. However, ScienceDirect database. This covers over 24 maintenance of such ontologies is expensive. In this paper, we investigate the use of univer- major disciplines and over 2500 journals. The Elsevier Merged Medical Taxonomy (EM- sal schemas (Riedel et al., 2013) as a mech- • anism for ontology maintenance. We ap- MeT) - a manually curated ontology contain- ply this approach on top of two unique data ing nearly one million concepts, three million sources: 14 million full-text scientific articles synonyms, more than 30 relation types, and and chapters, plus a 1 million concept hand- more than three million instances of relations curated medical ontology. We show that using between those concepts. a straightforward matrix factorization algo- rithm one can achieve 0.7 F1 measure on a link EMMeT is used within a number of Elsevier’s prediction task in this environment. Link pre- diction results can be used to suggest new rela- search engines to provide structured search results. tion types and relation type synonyms coming For example, within Clinical Key (a literature search from the literature as well as predict specific engine for clinicians), a user may search for ”breast new relation instances in the ontology.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontology Patterns and Beyond Towards a Universal Pattern Language
    Ontology Patterns and Beyond Towards a Universal Pattern Language Olaf Noppens and Thorsten Liebig Inst. of Artificial Intelligence, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany [email protected] Abstract. In this paper we argue for a broader view of ontology pat- terns and therefore present different use-cases where drawbacks of the current declarative pattern languages can be seen. We also discuss use- cases where a declarative pattern approach can replace procedural-coded ontology patterns. With previous work on an ontology pattern language in mind we argue for a general pattern language. 1 Motivation Though ontology engineers are supported by a wide range of authoring tools the task of designing ontologies is still difficult even for experts. Several studies on analyzing common errors in formalizing knowledge may serve as a prime example (e. g. [1], [2]). They have shown that often modeling problems were concerned with the act of writing down conflicting axioms, or with finding solutions for non- obvious but common modeling challenges (e. g. n-ary relationships). Extending the original notion of knowledge patterns [3] ontology design patterns (ODP) provide a modeling solution to solve a recurring ontology design problem [4], [5]. There is a wide range of ODP types such as ontology content patterns (OCPs), logical patterns, architectural patterns etc. [6]. In this paper, we would like to broaden the term ontology pattern by looking at different ontology engineering approaches. Some of them rely on procedu- ral knowledge. We argue that lifting them to a declarative level would enable a (semi-)automatic handling of patterns with the aim to support the ontology engineer during the entire ontology’s life-cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fundamental Worldview of the Integral Culture Integrating Science, Religion, and Art: 2Nd Part
    Published in: World Futures. The Journal of General Evolution, 59(7): 535-556. On the Fundamental Worldview of the Integral Culture Integrating Science, Religion, and Art: 2nd Part Attila Grandpierre Konkoly Observatory H-1525 Budapest, P. O. Box 67, Hungary 4.1. The nature of philosophy and scientific worldview Dilthey (1911) recognised that the most important question of philosophy is defining the main task of philosophy itself. Actually, this main task of philosophy has not been a settled question since the ancient Greeks. Let us make now an attempt to overcome this difficulty. “Philosophy is the science searching and systemising the most general laws of nature, human society and evolution of thinking. (…) It is the life-concept, the worldview, the attitude forming a more or less coherent system of views on the outer world, on the facts and phenomena of life and their nature, aim and interpretation” (Dictionary of Hungarian Language, 1979, 817). It seems that in this definition concepts of philosophy and worldview are mixed. Plato formulated the first and most important mark of philosophy as being the study in which various special sciences are to be related together and understood as part of one system (Kneale, 1960, 756). Now if philosophy is the “cognition of the world” and if it is science that researches and systemises “the most general laws of nature, society and the evolution of thinking”, then philosophy should be based on these special sciences. Therefore, since fundamental sciences are concerned to three fundamental realms of reality, which are existence, life and consciousness (Grandpierre, 2001b), philosophy should be the unified science of the most general laws of physics, biology and psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Universality of Science: Historical Validation of a Philosophical Idea
    Universality of Science : Historical Validation of a Philosophical Idea Michel Paty To cite this version: Michel Paty. Universality of Science : Historical Validation of a Philosophical Idea. Habib, S. Irfan and Raina, Dhruv. Situating the history of science : Dialogues with Joseph Needham, Oxford India Paperbacks, p. 303-324, 2001. halshs-00184932 HAL Id: halshs-00184932 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00184932 Submitted on 3 Nov 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Chap 12, in Habib, S. Irfan and Raina, Dhruv (eds.), Situating the history of science : Dialogues with Joseph Needham, Oxford University Press (New Delhi), 1999, p. 303-324 (Oxford India Paperbacks, 2001). (Trad. en anglais, par M.P. Original français : 1997f, 1999c). Universality of Science :Historical Validation of a Philosophical Idea A by MICHEL PATYB SUMMARY.- The question of the universality of science is considered, in contemporary debates, under the most varied and opposed positions depending whether one is sharing the point of view of an "ideal science" or that of a "social production of science". In the first case, science is conceived as the "hard core" of its statements and results at the period under consideration, and its supposed universality ignores factors that relativize its contents of knowledge, and which can be of a conceptual as well as a social nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaphysics: a Contemporary Introduction: Third Edition
    Metaphysics Metaphysics: A contemporary introduction is for students who have already done an introductory philosophy course. Michael J. Loux provides a fresh look at the central topics in metaphysics, making this essential reading for any student of the subject. This third edition is revised and updated and includes two new chapters on Time and Causation. Topics addressed include: • the problem of universals • the nature of abstract entities • the problem of individuation • the nature of modality • identity through time • the nature of time • the Realism/anti-Realism debate Wherever possible, Michael J. Loux relates contemporary views to their classical sources in the history of philosophy. As an experienced teacher of philosophy and an important contributor to recent debates, Loux is uniquely qualified to write this book. The third edition retains the student-friendly features of previous editions: • chapter overviews summarizing the main topics of study • examples to clarify difficult concepts • annotated further reading at the end of each chapter • endnotes and a full bibliography Michael J. Loux is Shuster Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is also editor of Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings, designed to accompany this textbook and also published by Routledge. His book Substance and Attribute (1978) is one of the major metaphysics books of recent years. Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy Series editor: Paul K. Moser Loyola University of Chicago This innovative, well-structured series is for students who have already done an introductory course in philosophy. Each book introduces a core general subject in contemporary philosophy and offers students an access- ible but substantial transition from introductory to higher-level college work in that subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Quine's Conjecture: Learning Through Language
    Imai, М & Септет, D. (гп ргевв). Liпguistic гelativity vs. ипгиегва1 ontology: сговв- liпguistic studies of the object substance disincrioп. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Sociery,1993. Liпguistic гelativity vs. ипi Уегsа1 oпtology: сговв-liпguistic studies of the objeet/substaпce distiпctioп Минвитi Imai апд Дедге Септет Northwestern University Iпнгодиснiоп Тнеге is уепега1 аугеетепн that снг1дгеп have ргiлсiр1ев that guide ннет iп 1еагпiпу шогд теапiпув . Тне гарiдгty with which ннеу асуиiге woгds такев it ип1гке1у that ннеу go thгough ац 1оуiсацу роввiЫе теапгпув whеп iлferring the геfегепн of а поие1 шогд (( uiпe, 1960). Еог ехатр1е, Маг1апап's whole object сопsп- int states that снг1дгеп iпгtiа11у наке woгds ав арр1уiпу to objects, пон рагнв ог ргорегнгев оГ objects (Магктап, 1990 ; Baldwiп, 1989). Тне ргiпсiр1е of соппавн (С1агк, 1987) апд the тиниа1 exclиsivity аввитрцоп (Магктап & Wachtell, 1988) сарниге снг1дгеп's рrefегепсе fог опе4о-опе таррiпу Ьetween words алд objects . Тне нахопотiс сопвпзiпн (Магктап & Нинс1цпвоп, 1984 ; Иахтап & Kosowski, 1990) апд the внаре bias (Lапдаи, Sтith & 7опев, 1988) деа1 with the шау снг1дгеп ехнёпд поил теалiлув to new геfегепнв given that а шогд has Ьееп аррliед to ап object. Атопу the ргоровед theories of coпstraiпts, the objeсt-fiгst coлstгaint (Септет, 1982 Маг1стал, 1990; Baldwin 1989; Маспатага, 1982) seems to Ье the 1оуiса1 ргеседепн fог оннег coпstraiпts such as тиниа1 exclusiviry, the нахопотiс constraint апд the shape bias . Ношеиег, if the object-first сопвцаiпн does exist, it introduces а ргоЫет that wi11 пеед to Ье оиегсоте . That is, it сап Ье арр1iед оп1у iп 1еатiпу патев of objects, Ьин 1ю1 all поим аге object патев. Тне ргiпсiр1ев governiпg шогд теапiпу ехнепвiоп fог object патев апд substaлce патев аге ~ипдатепнаllу diffeгeпt, reflectiпg the fилдатепна1 опно1оуiса1 дгiТегепсе Ьеншееп object 1сiпдв апд substance 1апдв.
    [Show full text]