DOCSLIB.ORG

The Use of Physical Intelligence in General George B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Use of Physical Intelligence in General George B THE USE OF PHYSICAL INTELLIGENCE IN GENERAL GEORGE B. MCCLEUAN ' S 186 2 PENINSULAR CAMPAIGN . A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by PATRICK JAMES HEINSEN In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts April, 1997 (6 Patrick Heinsen, 1997 National Library Bibliothèque nationale I*m of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada rour rn votre refermctl Our fiie Notre rdference The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive Licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loaq distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in rnicroform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author' s ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT THE USE OF PHYSICAL INTELLIGENCE IN GENERAL GEORGE B. MCCLELLAN ' S 186 2 PENINSULAR CAMPAIGN . Patrick James Heinsen Advisor: University of Guelph, 1997 Professor LR. Farrell This thesis is an investigation of the use and misuse of physical intelligence by Union General George B. McClellan during his 1862 Virginia Peninsula Campaign. Civil War historians have yet to consider what role maps and their accompanying reports played in both the planning and execution of the Campaign. This neglect has led to incomplete conclusions regarding the important question of why the Peninsular Campaign failed. General McClellan would later explain that poor physical intelligence resulted in the failure of the Amy of the Potomac to take Richmond. From an examination of the original reports and maps of the region, it appears that McClellan was only partially justified in this conclusion. While McClellanrs maps were incomplete and in some cases possessed glaring errors, reports of the Peninsula's topography and environmental conditions were remarkably prophetic. That McClellan chose to ignore these reports raises questions concerning the quality of his generalship. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to extend my thanks to the members of my comrnittee, Prof. David Farrell, Prof. Richard Reid, and Prof. Catharine Wilson for their unending support and encouragement. 1 would also like to thank Prof. Emeritus Mo McKenna of the University of Calgary for first sparking my interest in the American Civil War. Thanks to Barb and Barb in the office of the Department of History at the University of Guelph for al1 their help. Finally I wish to thank my family in Red Deer, the Glsand most of al1 my wife (and research assistant) Gina without whom al1 these efforts would have been for naught. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: "Physical Intelligence and the American Civil War" 1. Military intelligence in the Civil War. 5 II. What is "physical intelligence"? 9 CHAPTER TWO: "Where were the maps of Virginia?" 1. Interna1 Improvements Program. II, Civilian maps. CHAPTER THREE: 34 '"Physical Intelligence and the 'American Waterlooff' 1. Physical intelligence and Campaign planning. 46 II. Urbanna to Fort Monroe. 54 CHAPTER FOUR: "On to Richmond" 1. April 4. 11. April 5. III. Warwick River. CHAPTER FIVE: "Williamsburg to Harrison's Landing" 1. Battle of Williamsburg- II. The Chickahominy. III. The Seven Days. IV. Battle of Glendale. CONCLUSIONS 124 BIBLIOGRAPHY 131 PHYSICAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR Spy & Topog duty has been more neglected by our folkç than any other and is the principal cause of surprises and defeats. A Wornall 1863 General George B. McClellan was receiving a substantial dose of partisan politics as he sat in the basement of the Capital building, late in February of 1863. Before him perched the members of Americars answer to the Star Chamber: the men of the Joint Congressional Cornmittee on the Conduct of the War under the reigns of all-out abolitionist Ben Wade of Ohio. On his last visit before this tribunal in January of 1862 (after the disaster of Ballrs Bluff) the impression he had made was singularly unimpressive - leading some of the Senators to cal1 for his withdrawal from command. This the they were out for his head. '' 'At what period, '" Senator Gooch asked of him, " 'had the works of the enemy at Yorktown [Virginia, on the York/James Peninsula] been constructed?"' McClellan explained that the Confederate works had most likely been on the Peninsula for some the. "'Did you know of those works before you landed on the peninsula?'" McClellan answered frankly: "'No, we did not know of the line of works along the Warwick. Gooch pressed his opening asking whether or not the topography of the Peninsula was well understood by anyone connected with his command when he began the Campaign. "'Our mapsff" McClellan explained, "'proved entirely inaccurate, and did us more harm than good, for we were constantly misled by them. ' f' "'Rad there not, '" continued the Senator, "'been a great misapprehension as to the character of the roads and the nature of the soi1 on the peninsula?'" Little Mac's feeble response spoke volumes: "'1 was deceived.'"l Politically and militarily, the laurels of 1861 belonged to the fledging Southern Confederacy. These States had produced a working goverment, and while it was not without substantial flaws, it was undeniably a functioning entity. They had also created amies that could and did successfully defend southern borders. They had created a country. General McClellan's modest successes in Western Virginia in June and July of that year at Philippi, Rich Mountain and Garrick's Ford and the Navy's many successful amphibious assaults did something to redress earlier defeats along Bull Run and Wilson's Creek. But when those disasters were emphasised, east and west, by Ball's Bluff in October and the bloody repulse of Grant at Belrnont, Missouri in November, there was a distinct public impression, both North and South, at home and abroad, that the North was failing in its quest to Save the Union. As President Lincoln would bemoan to Quartemaster General M.C. Meigs, "the bottom is out of the tub . ."2 This was the situation that found General McCZellan in 1U.S. Congress. Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War. Army of the Potomac, Vol. 1, (Millwood, NY.: Kraus, 1977). pp. 428-430. My italics. ZShelby Foote, The Civil War, A Narrative: Fort Sumter to Perryville, Vol. 1 of 3 Vols, (New York: Vintage Books, a division of Random House, 1986), p. 156 (hereafter cited as: The Civil War, A Narrative). command of al1 Union Armies in November of that year. At the tender age of thirty-four, the "Young Napoleon of the west", as the journalists were calling him, promised Lincoln that he "could do it all." McClelian set about planning a massive strike (linking his name even closer to that of the Corsican's) at the Rebel capital in order to crush the rebellion in a single, glorious blow - an "American Waterloow. The 1862 Peninsular Campaign that followed was one of the largest of the war, pitting the premier Federal army of over 100 000 men against its Confederate counterpart within sight of Richmond's church spires. McCleilan took his Grande Armée closer than any other Save General US. Grant to ending the Confederacy. His campaign was intended to erase the memory of the unorganised 'fist-fightr that was Bull Run and the inept management that produced Ballrs Bluff. Every detail would be taken into consideration in order to orchestrate the perfect campaign. That there were flaws came as no surprise, but that the planned instrument of the destruction of the Confederacy - McClellants Army of the Potomac - came itself within a hair's breadth of annihilation filled onlookers on both sides with amazement. What went wrong? Historians of Civil War are al1 confronted by this question, and have al1 focused on McClellan himself in attempting to explain the Anny of the Potomac's failure. In doing so, they have tended to centre their discussion on the divide between General McClellan and the Lincoln Administration. The failure of the Army of the Potomac was therefore explained either by a lack of ~dministration support or lack of forethought on McClellanrs behalf. McClellan apologists point to the withholding of General McDarell as the primary reason behind McCleilants failure. H.J. Eckenrode and Bryan Conrad suggest that the withholding of McDowell, while giving McClellan greater determination in having to overcome this "adverse stroke of fortune", was the result of Secretary of War Edwin Stantonrs secret desire to destroy McClellan. Stanton, it is argued, "worked on Lincoln's fears" concerning Washington's defences, thereby inducing the President to fatally denude McClellan's army of this important body of troops.3 Similar is the work of William Swinton who claimed that the withholding of McDowell brought on the siege of Yorktown which in turn destroyed McClellanfs campaign. Swinton hauever, wisely noted that "grave faults were committed both by the Administration and by General McClellan."4 Focusing strictly on high-level decision making, however, does not adequately answer the question. Certainly, the interaction between McClellan and his Commander-in-Chief is very important in understanding why Richmond did not fa11 in the summer of 1862. But this interaction is only one ~H.J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hampton-Newport News 9979
    HOSTED BYBY THEHUNTING HAMPTON CREEK ROADS GARDEN GARDEN CLUB CLUB AND AND THE THEGARDEN HUNTINGTON CLUB OF GARDENALEXANDRIA CLUB Hampton-Newport News 9979 TICKET INCLUDES ADMISSION TO THE FOLLOWING 6 PROPERTIES: START Providence Mennonite Church HERE roof. The property occupies more than 13101 Warwick Boulevard three acres of former field and pasture lands along busy Warwick Blvd. It is nestled Providence Mennonite Church and ceme- behind a serpentine brick wall where ducks, tery are located on five acres adjacent to the geese and swans glide placidly in the family C.P. Yoder Homestead on Warwick Blvd. pond and wander throughout the grounds. It was built by Mennonite farmers and car- Of special interest are the summer house, penters and established in 1900 as the Photo courtesy of Pam Henefin kitchen garden, grape arbor, foxglove gar- Amish/Mennonite denomination. Several den, chicken house and evergreen borders. families had withdrawn from the Warwick A major home renovation and addition took River/Mennonite Church and D.Z. Yoder, place in 1997. Each room is filled with char- co-founder of the Warwick River Menno- acter and family history, including memo- nite Colony, served as their new pastor. A rabilia from the Yoder Dairy and Yoder/ simple country church with a heart pine Smucker families. There are several French frame and a metal roof, it boasts cathe- country antiques, a Swiss cuckoo clock, an dral-style windows and the original interior original Noland & Co. stove and a family hand-crafted woodwork. Two original ker- Bible from 1881. The heart pine floors were osene lamps are on display.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    UPS Form 10-WO LRI 16. tucr-uul (Oct. 1990) United States Doparbent of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM I. Name of Property ---. - ----I- ---. historic name Dam Number One Battlefield Site other namesfsite number -Lee's Mill Battlefield; Newport News Park; VDIiR File No. 121-60 ------ ---- -- -- ----.--. 2. Location --- -------- - ----.--. street & number- 13560 Jefferson Avenue not for publication x city or town -Newport News vicinity N/f state Virginia code OA county Newport News (independent code 700 zip code 2360. citvl -- -- - .- - - - 3. State/Federal Agency Certification - - - - - - - - - As the designated authority uder the National Historic Preservatim Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this -x- nminati request for determination of eligibility wets the doc-tatim standards for registering prowrties in the NatimaI Register -Historic Places and meets the procedural ard professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my Opinion, the Property -x - mets does mt imt the National Register Criteria. I recumem that this property be considerea significant - nationai -x - staten=- locally. ( - See cmtimation sheet for additimal camnents.) '.L- ,!-;'&,; <. ,- -/ - L : -. , . ,, flk'~- c. ' -. Sfgnature -of certifying official/Title Date , > L..fl. -, ,J , -..., ,.-.-<: ,LA- ,,,,: L ',' /.. / 2:1 L ,i.&~&.~/,/,s 0*A: i 2.74 ," - .- .-- L, ,, Virginia Department of Historic Resources State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the pro~erty- meets - does not meet tne Nationai Register critsia. ( See cmtiowrim sheet for addiricnai cmrs.) signature of carmenring or omer official Dare State or FederaL agency am bureau -------- --------------- --------------- ------- ------------- --4. National Park Service-------------------- Certification ------------- ----------- I, hereby certify that this property is: entered in the Naticnal Register - See cmtirrJarion sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • James River Geography
    James River Geography Welcome to NOAA's James River Interpretive Buoy, located at latitude 37 degrees 12.25 minutes North, longitude 76 degrees 46.65 minutes West. It lies off Jamestown Island about a quarter-mile south of Captain John Smith's statue, where he can see it well as he looks out over the river. This buoy is anchored in 43 feet of water at the edge of the narrow shoal that runs along the island. The river's channel is deep here, as the James narrows down between Swanns Point on the south and Jamestown on the north, but it quickly shoals as it sweeps through the broad meander curve from Cobham Bay around Hog Island and down toward Burwell Bay. The buoy lies about thirty miles above the mouth of the James at Hampton Roads. Jamestown Island lies at a transition point on the James. Five miles upstream is the mouth of the Chickahominy River, which adds a strong current of fresh water to the heavy flow already coming out of the James watershed from deep in Virginia's uplands, the mountains at the eastern edge of the Alleghany Plateau. In wet years, the water here is nearly fresh. The mouth of the James, however, lies close to the Chesapeake's mouth, so salt water can also flow upriver with the tides. In John Smith's time here, the region suffered a multi-year drought, so the river and the colonists' drinking water was probably brackish, an irritating factor that may account for some of the bickering and poor health that plagued them.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC ZACHARY TAYLQR HOME, "SPRINGFIELD"_______________________ AND/OR COMMON "Springfield" ___ ____________________ LOCATION STREET& NUMBER 5608 Apache Road _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT T.nip cyl lie _^ VICINITY OF T^i-prl STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Kentucky 021 Jefferson 1 1 1 QCLA SSIFI C ATI ON CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT _PUBLIC —OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM J^BUILDINGIS) PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH X.WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL XPRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS —YES. RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED —YES. UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION .KNO —MILITARY —OTHER Q OWNER OF PROPERTY *unoccupied pending repair NAME Hugh S. Hayne STREET & NUMBER 5608 Apache Road CITY. TOWN STATE Louisville _ VICINITY OF Kenturkv LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC Registry of Deeds STREET& NUMBER Jefferson County Court House CITY. TOWN STATE Louisville Kentucky 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Historic American Buildings Survey (histnrir DATE X-FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL 1Q74 DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Library of Congress/ division of prints and photographs CITY. TOWN STATE Washington DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT ^DETERIORATE ) * —UNALTERED 2L.ORIGINAL SITE —GOOD _RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE_______ —FAIR _UNEXPOSED _______________*tornado damage___________ DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Richard Taylor constructed "Springfield" at the highest point on his 400-acre farm, located along the Muddy Fork of Beargrass Creek, just east of Louisville, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lincoln- Mcclellan Relationship in Myth and Memory
    The Lincoln- McClellan Relationship in Myth and Memory MARK GRIMSLEY Like many Civil War historians, I have for many years accepted invita- tions to address the general public. I have nearly always tried to offer fresh perspectives, and these have generally been well received. But almost invariably the Q and A or personal exchanges reveal an affec- tion for familiar stories or questions. (Prominent among them is the query “What if Stonewall Jackson had been present at Gettysburg?”) For a long time I harbored a private condescension about this affec- tion, coupled with complete incuriosity about what its significance might be. But eventually I came to believe that I was missing some- thing important: that these familiar stories, endlessly retold in nearly the same ways, were expressions of a mythic view of the Civil War, what the amateur historian Otto Eisenschiml memorably labeled “the American Iliad.”1 For Eisenschiml “the American Iliad” was merely a clever title for a compendium of eyewitness accounts of the conflict, but I take the term seriously. In Homer’s Iliad the anger of Achilles, the perfidy of Agamemnon, the doomed gallantry of Hector—and the relationships between them—have enormous, uncontested, unchanging, and almost primal symbolic meaning. So too do certain figures in the American Iliad. Prominent among these are the butcher Grant, the Christ-like Lee, and the rage- filled Sherman. I believe that the traditional Civil War narrative functions as a national myth of central importance to our understanding of ourselves as Americans. And like the classic mythologies of old, it contains timeless wisdom about what it means to be a human being.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862
    Collection SC 0084 W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection 1862 Table of Contents User Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Container List Processed by Emily Hershman 27 June 2011 Thomas Balch Library 208 W. Market Street Leesburg, VA 20176 USER INFORMATION VOLUME OF COLLECTION: 2 folders COLLECTION DATES: 1862 PROVENANCE: W. Roger Smith, Midland, TX. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: Collection open for research USE RESTRICTIONS: No physical characteristics affect use of this material. REPRODUCTION RIGHTS: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from Thomas Balch Library. CITE AS: W. Roger Smith Civil War Research Collection, 1862 (SC 0084), Thomas Balch Library, Leesburg, VA. ALTERNATE FORMATS: None OTHER FINDING AIDS: None TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS: None RELATED HOLDINGS: None ACCESSION NUMBERS: 1995.0046 NOTES: Formerly filed in Thomas Balch Library Vertical Files 2 HISTORICAL SKETCH From its organization in July 1861, the Army of the Potomac remained the primary Union military force in the East, confronting General Robert E. Lee’s (1807-1870) Army of Northern Virginia in a series of battles and skirmishes. In the early years of the Civil War, however, the Army of the Potomac suffered defeats at the Battle of the First Bull Run in 1861, the Peninsula Campaign and the Battle of Fredericksburg in 1862, as well as the Battle of Chancellorsville in 1863. Historians attribute its initial lack of victories to poor leadership from a succession of indecisive generals: Irvin McDowell (1818-1885), George McClellan (1826-1885), Ambrose Burnside (1824-1881), and Joseph Hooker (1814-1879). When General George Meade (1815-1872) took command of the Army of the Potomac in June 1863, he was successful in pushing the Army of Northern Virginia out of Pennsylvania following the Battle of Gettysburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocahontas and Captain John Smith Revisited
    Pocahontas and Captain John Smith Revisited FREDERIC W. GLEACH Cornell University The story of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith is one that all school­ children in the United States seem to learn early on, and one that has served as the basis for plays, epic poems, and romance novels as well as historical studies. The lyrics of Peggy Lee's hit song Fever exemplify these popular treatments: Captain Smith and Pocahontas Had a very mad affair. When her daddy tried to kill him She said, 'Daddy, oh don't you dare — He gives me fever ... with his kisses, Fever when he holds me tight; Fever — I'm his Mrs. Daddy won't you treat him right.' (Lee et al 1958) The incident referred to here, Pocahontas's rescue of Smith from death at the orders of her father, the paramount chief Powhatan, was originally recorded by the only European present — Smith himself. While the factu- ality of Smith's account has been questioned since the mid-19th century, recent textual analysis by Lemay (1992) supports the more widely held opinion that it most likely occurred as Smith reported. Other recent studies have employed methods and models imported from literary criticism, gen­ erally to demonstrate the nature of English colonial and historical modes of apprehending otherness.1 While my work may be easily contrasted to these approaches, two re­ cent studies must be mentioned which have employed understandings and methods similar to my own. Kidwell (1992:99-101) used Pocahontas as an example in her discussion of "Indian Women as Cultural Mediators", 1ln addition to the comments of participants in the Algonquian Conference I have had the benefit of discussion with members of the Department of Anthropol­ ogy of Cornell University, where I presented some of these ideas in a departmental colloquium.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Keys: Attack of the 8Th New York “They Did Not Know What Was in Store for Them”
    CROSS KEYS: ATTACK OF THE 8TH NEW YORK “THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT WAS IN STORE FOR THEM” Watercolor illustration of the attack of the 8th New York by eyewitness Pvt. Henry Berckhoff of the 8th New York. Gilder Lehrman Collection. “A BENGAL TIGER READY TO SPRING” “MAKE A STAND AT PORT REPUBLIC” As they advanced to attack at Cross Keys on the morning of During the closing stages of his 1862 Valley June 8, 1862, the members of the Union 8th New York Campaign, Confederate Gen. Stonewall Jackson Volunteer Infantry – the “First German Rifles” – were singing was being pursued south by two Union forces a German folk song, “Hinaus in die Ferne” (“Out Into the under Gen. John C. Fremont and Gen. James Distance”) and marching as if they were on parade. Shields. When Jackson reached the end of Massanutten Mountain near Harrisonburg on Gen. Stonewall Jackson One Confederate later recalled how the Federals advanced June 5, he was in danger of Fremont and Shields “across the clover field [on the target properties] in beautiful uniting against him. To prevent this, he turned southeast, taking line.” Their commander, Col. Francis Wutschel, walked his main force to “make a stand at Port Republic,” and leaving “backwards in front of them, seeing that they preserved a per- Gen. Richard Ewell’s force to block Fremont at Cross Keys. fect alignment just as though they were drilling” as they “ANXIOUS TO MEET THEM” descended into a hollow and When Fremont approached Cross Keys briefly disappeared from view. on June 8, 1862, Ewell placed his men in Unfortunately for the a strong defensive position on a ridge along Mill Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Mobile Bay
    CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM NY NY HistoricalSociety - dson PaintingbyDavi J.O. INTRODUCTION Students of the Civil War find no shortage of material regarding the battle of Mobile Bay. There are numerous stirring accounts of Farragut’s dramatic damning of the “torpedoes” and the guns of Fort Morgan, and of the gallant but futile resistance offered by the CSS Tennessee to the entire Union Fleet. These accounts range from the reminiscences of participants to the capably analyzed reappraisals by Centennial historians. It is particularly frustrating then, to find hardly any adequate description of the land campaign for Mobile in the general accounts of the War between the States. A few lines are usually deemed sufficient by historians to relate this campaign to reduce the last major confederate stronghold in the West, described as the best fortified city in the Confederacy by General Joseph E. Johnston, and which indeed did not fall until after General Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. It fell then to an attacking Federal force of some 45,000 troops, bolstered by a formidable siege train and by the support of the Federal Navy. Battles and Leaders of the Civil War, to give one example, devotes 33 well illustrated pages to the battle of Mobile Bay, but allows only one page for the land CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM operations of 1865 ! The following account is written as a small contribution to the Civil War Centennial and is intended to provide a brief but reasonably comprehensive account of the campaign. Operations will from necessity be viewed frequently from the positions of the attacking Federal forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulated Changes in Salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from Projected Sea-Level Rise in Chesapeake Bay
    Prepared in cooperation with the City of Newport News Simulated Changes in Salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from Projected Sea-Level Rise in Chesapeake Bay Open-File Report 2011–1191 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photograph: St. Michaels Marina, Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. Simulated Changes in Salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from Projected Sea-Level Rise in Chesapeake Bay By Karen C. Rice, Mark R. Bennett, and Jian Shen Prepared in cooperation with the City of Newport News Open-File Report 2011–1191 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Rice, K.C., Bennett, M.R., and Shen, Jian, 2011, Simulated changes in salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from projected sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • John Taylor Wood: Man of Action, Man of Honor
    The Cape Fear Civil War Round Table John Taylor Wood: Man of Action, Man of Honor By Tim Winstead History 454 December 4, 2009 On July 20, 1904, a short obituary note appeared on page seven of the New York Times. It simply stated, "Captain John Taylor Wood, grandson of President Zachary Taylor and nephew of Jefferson Davis, died in Halifax, N.S. yesterday, seventy-four years old." The note also stated that Wood served as a United States Navy midshipman, fought in the Mexican War, served as a Confederate army colonel on the staff of Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee's army, escaped the collapse of the Confederacy with General Breckinridge to Cuba, and was a resident of Halifax, Nova Scotia when he passed. In one paragraph, the obituary writer prepared the outline of the life of a man who participated in many of the major events of the American Civil War. John Taylor Wood's story was much more expansive and interwoven with the people and history of the Civil War era than the one paragraph credited to him by the Times. This paper examined the events in which Wood found himself immersed and sought to determine his role in those events. The main focus of the paper was Wood's exploits during his service to the Confederate States of America. His unique relationships with the leadership of the Confederacy ensured that he was close at hand when decisions were made which affected the outcome of the South's gamble for independence. Was John Taylor Wood the Forrest Gump of his day? Was it mere chance that Wood was at Hampton Roads on March 9, 1862, at Drewry's Bluff on May 15, 1862, abroad the USS Satellite in August 1863, aboard the USS Underwriter at New Berne in February 1864, abroad the CSS Tallahassee in August 1864, or with Jefferson Davis on the "unfortunate day" in Georgia on May 10, 1865? Was it only his relationship with Jefferson Davis that saw Wood engaged in these varied events? This paper examined these questions and sought to establish that it was Wood's competence and daring that placed him at the aforementioned actions and not Jefferson Davis's nepotism.
    [Show full text]