• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Probing the energy reactance with adiabatically driven quantum dots Mar´ıaFlorencia Ludovico,1, 2 Liliana Arrachea,1, 3 Michael Moskalets,4 and David S´anchez5 1International Center for Advanced Studies, UNSAM, Campus Miguelete, 25 de Mayo y Francia, 1650 Buenos Aires, Argentina 2The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy 3Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems and Fachbereich Physik, Freie Universit¨atBerlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany 4Department of Metal and Semiconductor Physics, NTU "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute", 61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine 5Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems IFISC (UIB-CSIC), E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain The tunneling Hamiltonian describes a particle transfer from one region to the other. While there is no particle storage in the tunneling region itself, it has associated certain amount of energy. We name the corresponding flux energy reactance since, like an electrical reactance, it manifests itself in time-dependent transport only. Noticeably, this quantity is crucial to reproduce the universal charge relaxation resistance for a single-channel quantum capacitor at low temperatures. We show that a conceptually simple experiment is capable of demonstrating the existence of the energy reactance. PACS numbers: 73.23.-b, 72.10.Bg, 73.63.Kv, 44.10.+i Motivation. A very exciting experimental activity is lately taking place in search of controlling on-demand quantum coherent charge transport in the time domain. The recent burst of activity started with the experimen- Floating contact tal realization of quantum capacitors in quantum dots under ac driving [1], single particle emitters [2], and was followed by the generation of quantum charged solitons over the Fermi sea (levitons) [3]. A controlled manipula- tion of flying single electrons [4{6] and their time-resolved detection [7] have already been reported [8]. These mar- velous developments, along with the identically impres- sive progress in the field of fast thermometry [9{11], are opening an avenue towards the study and control of the concomitant time-dependent energy flow in the quantum realm. FIG. 1. Schematic of our proposal. The quantum RC circuit consists of a quantum dot (blue disk) coupled to a fermionic The relevant systems are characterized by small reservoir (light blue region) with well defined temperature T (nanoscale) components confining a small number of par- and chemical potential µ. Electrons can be transferred be- ticles in contact to macroscopic reservoirs. This puts tween the dot and the reservoir (black curve). The dot is the description of the energy transport and heat gener- capacitively coupled to a gate terminal where an ac potential of amplitude V and frequency Ω is applied. A floating contact ation beyond the scope of usual thermodynamical ap- is also attached to the dot. The temperature T and chemi- proaches, motivating a number of formal theoretical de- c cal potential µc of the floating contact adjust themselves to velopments in statistical mechanics [12] and condensed cancel both the charge and heat current flowing through it, matter physics [13]. At the heart of this problem, there thus allowing for an experimental test of the energy reactance, is the proper definition of the quantum heat current in namely, the variation of the stored energy at the tunneling re- the time domain. The concept of heat looks very intu- gion between the floating contact and the dot (gray line). itive and anyone can provide a definition for it. Formally, it is a clear and well established concept in macroscopic arXiv:1708.02856v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 9 Aug 2017 systems close to equilibrium. However, its accurate defi- the theoretical point of view is a periodically driven sin- nition at the nanoscale and in situations away from equi- gle level in contact to an electron reservoir. This is the librium is a deep and subtle issue, in particular due to the most basic and meaningful setup to analyze the inter- coupling between a nanosystem and macroscopic reser- play of charge and energy dynamics. At the same time, voirs; see, e.g., Refs. 14{23. In fact, while charge and this is the simplest model for a quantum RC circuit [24], energy are concepts obeying strict fundamental conser- which has been experimentally realized [1]. A sketch vation laws, the definition of heat implies the proper iden- is presented in Fig.1, where we stress that the driven tification of a portion of the total energy. level represents a quantum dot. The nonequilibrium in- An appealing scenario to address this problem from gredient is provided by the time-dependent gate voltage 2 V (t) = V cos (Ωt) locally applied to the single level. The sive electrode that keeps its temperature and chemical reservoir is an electron gas with temperature T and chem- potential constant independently of the ac potential. In ical potential µ, and the strength of the coupling between practice, this can be achieved grounding the reservoir as the two subsystems is arbitrary. The setup also includes indicated in Fig.1. Its temperature variations would be a “floating contact", which we will discuss in detail later suppressed if the reservoir has in addition a large heat on. capacity. The effect of the periodic driving is twofold. On one The evolution of the chemical potential and temper- hand, it induces a charge current that flows between the ature of the floating contact as the dot is aidabatically dot and the reservoir as a function of time. On the other driven can be sensed by means of a voltage probe and hand, it performs a work on the system, thus injecting a thermometer [27{35], as indicated in the figure. We energy that is ultimately dissipated as heat deep inside predict different behaviors for µc and Tc depending on the reservoir. Importantly, due to charge conservation, whether the energy reactance is considered or not in the the electronic current is defined as the change in time of heat flux into the floating contact. In this way, the pro- the electron number either at the reservoir or on the dot. posed experiment would help to discern on the proper No contribution of the tunneling region on the charge definition of the heat current and test the existence of current exists. In contrast, the energy delivered by the the energy reactance. external ac source is temporarily stored in three different The results are the following: (i) By defining the heat parts of the setup: the dot, the reservoir and also in the flux into the floating contact, taking into account the dot-reservoir tunneling region. The role of the tunneling energy reactance as in Ref. 15, the temperature of the region is typically disregarded in classical thermodynam- floating contact does not vary with time. The outcome ics because it is a surface term that is negligible when is both the system and the reservoir are macroscopic [26]. Yet, in the nanoscale setup studied here the amount of Tc = T; (1) energy stored in the dot is comparable to that of the tun- where T is the background temperature. The chemical neling region and the latter can no longer be neglected. potential of the contact µc(t) does vary with time in a In a recent work [15] we have coined the name of energy periodic fashion with a period dictated by the electrical reactance to characterize the energy temporarily stored current flowing through the dot. (ii) We demonstrate at the tunneling region. This is a thermal analogue of that any other definition of the heat current, that does an electrical reactance (due to electrical capacitance and not properly account for the energy reactance, necessarily inductance), which manifests itself in a time-dependent leads to a change in both quantities, Tc(t) and µc(t) as setup only. We have argued that it is physically mean- functions of time. ingful to take the energy reactance into account as a Heat current into the floating contact and quantum en- contribution to the time-dependent heat current flow- ergy reactance. Let the rates of change for the charge and ing into the reservoir. We have shown that this is in the internal energy stored in the floating contact due to full agreement with the laws of thermodynamics [13, 23]. exchanges with the rest of the device be, respectively, While some recent works raised some concerns [18, 22], N_ c(t) and U_ c(t). Similarly, the rate of change for the en- other works arrived at conclusions similar to our analy- ergy stored at the tunneling region between the dot and sis [14, 17, 21]. The aim of the present work is to make _ the floating contact is denoted by UTc (t). The meaning- one step further by proposing a measurement scheme that ful definition for the instantaneous heat current entering is able to test the effect of the energy reactance onto a the floating contact is [15] time-dependent heat flux. Proposed experiment and predictions. The setup is _ UTc (t) Q_ c(t) = U_ c(t) + µc(t)N_ c(t) : (2) sketched in Fig.1, where we introduce a floating con- 2 − tact attached (e.g., via tunneling) to the quantum dot. _ When a periodic gate voltage V (t) is applied, charge and The energy reactance, UTc (t)=2, contributes to the heat heat currents enter not only the reservoir but also the flux only instantaneously and as such vanishes when av- floating contact. The latter can adjust its chemical po- eraged over one driving period. tential µc and temperature Tc to maintain zero charge From the theoretical point of view, the energy reac- and heat currents flowing into it. We will focus on slow tance is necessary to derive an instantaneous Joule law \adiabatic" driving, which corresponds to a driving pe- for the heat current into a (single-channel) floating con- 2 riod much larger than any characteristic time scale for tact at low temperatures, Q_ c(t) = Rq[N_ c(t)] , with the the system.

Load more

  10

Copy Link