Council Analysis of Submissions November 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Council Analysis of Submissions November 2010 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT: Extraordinary Meeting – 17 November 2010 Draft Queanbeyan Local Environmental Plan (South Tralee) 2010 (Ref: SF090104; Author: Carswell) Attachment 4(a) Submissions Received during Public Exhibition - Summary of Issues & Comments (Issues 1-8) ATTACHMENT – ITEM 1 1 Item 1. Extraordinary Meeting – 17 November 2010 Draft Queanbeyan Local Environmental Plan (South Tralee) 2010 (Ref: SF090104; Author: Carswell) (Continued) Key Topic Issue Comment 1. Aircraft Noise Flight Path 1.1 Flight Path & Noise Sharing Recommendations of the supplementary report as well as Tralee is affected by Canberra Airport’s flight paths and a clause in the Draft Plan will mean that South Tralee development under the flight path will result in: future residents will be amongst the best informed and - residents being exposed to unacceptable levels of noise protected against aircraft noise in the Region in the event - noise complaints from Tralee residents that the development proceeds,. This would be expected - noise sharing (altered flight paths over Canberra/NSW) to dampen any future calls from this community for noise - creation of noise lobby groups sharing and/or a curfew. - a curfew for Canberra Airport The relevant clause in the Draft Plan is 7.2 Development - and other restrictions on airport. in areas subject to aircraft noise which exceeds the applicable standard in NSW being Ministerial Direction 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes . It does this by requiring noise insulation for all development in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 2021 up to interior noise levels. Noise sharing is controlled by Commonwealth long standing policy called Environmental Principles and Procedures for Minimising the Impact of Aircraft Noise . Council’s consultants have reviewed this policy and conclude that noise sharing would be contrary to that policy. 1.2 Adverse impact on development from flight path Environmental impacts from aircraft movements are Impact of exhaust pollution and reverberation and vibration on controlled by the Commonwealth. It would be expected properties/people under flight path. that any future residents of South Tralee would be afforded the same degree of protection as residents in similar situations. In relation to vibration. Clause 7.2 of the Draft Plan exceeds the NSW standard (being Ministerial Direction 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes ) by requiring noise insulation for all development in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 2021 up to interior noise levels. 2 Item 1. Extraordinary Meeting – 17 November 2010 Draft Queanbeyan Local Environmental Plan (South Tralee) 2010 (Ref: SF090104; Author: Carswell) (Continued) 1.3 Development under Flight Path This area was identified for future development by the The best way to avoid complaints about aircraft noise –which endorsed Queanbeyan Residential and Economic inevitably leads to difficulties and unhappy rate payers, is to Strategy 2031 which considered a whole raft of issues in ensure development does not occur under flight paths. addition to aircraft noise. In addition Draft Plan exceeds the NSW standard (being Ministerial Direction 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes and calling up the Australian Standard AS 2021) for aircraft noise mitigation and which is triggered by Canberra Airport’s Ultimate Capacity ANEF. 1.4 Flight Path A number of submissions indicate considerable interest in People do not want to live under a flight path. the development of this area and urge South Tralee to proceed. Purchasers will be very well informed at the time of purchase. 1.5 Flight Path inappropriate for Residential development The applicable standard in NSW is Ministerial Direction Inappropriate development on ‘off airport’ land, or development 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes which calls in green field areas affected by flight path/high noise should not up the Australian Standard AS 2021. Clause 7.2 of the occur. Residential landuse and development under (or Draft Plan exceeds the NSW standard for aircraft noise potentially under a flight path) is inappropriate. mitigation as triggered by Canberra Airport’s Ultimate Capacity ANEF. 1.6 Retain Flight path as non residential See comment 1.5. Flight corridor has been free from residential development since 1960’s and mistakes of other cities should be avoided. 3 Item 1. Extraordinary Meeting – 17 November 2010 Draft Queanbeyan Local Environmental Plan (South Tralee) 2010 (Ref: SF090104; Author: Carswell) (Continued) 1.7 Flight Path inappropriate for Residential development The endorsed Queanbeyan Residential and Economic Council has opportunity to actively avoid the well known and Strategy 2031 considered a whole raft of issues in documented confrontation between (future) residents beneath a addition to aircraft noise when identifying South flight path and the airport operator. Council should not be Jerrabomberra for future residential and employment seeking short tem financial benefit from private development development. In addition clause 7.2 of the Draft Plan while imposing future costs on future residents. exceeds the NSW standard for aircraft noise mitigation (being Ministerial Direction 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes and calling up the Australian Standard AS 2021) and which is triggered by Canberra Airport’s Ultimate Capacity ANEF. 1.8 Flight Path inappropriate for Residential development See comment 1.7. It has long been recognised that good planning practice would be to prevent the co-location of inappropriate land uses 1.9 Flight Path – Acoustic and Noise control standard Any future draft plans in areas affected by aircraft noise The controls in relation to acoustics and noise intrusion in the will have to have regard to the applicable standard in S65 Certificate should not become a precedent for future land NSW at the time as well as the technically endorsed use planning in the area. ANEF at the time. 1.10 Senate findings The applicable standard in NSW is Ministerial Direction Council should consider the recent findings of the 3.5 Development Near Licensed Aerodromes which calls Commonwealth Senate with respect to aircraft noise. up Australian Standard 2021 and which the Airports Ultimate Practical Capacity ANEF triggers and the Draft Plan exceeds. 1.11 ACT approach to Aircraft noise See comment 1.10. There has been no recognition of ACTs approach to minimising aircraft noise 1.12 Flight Path maps and document availability Hard copies of the technically endorsed Ultimate Practical Aircraft flight path and noise related maps were not made Capacity ANEF were amongst the displayed material at 5 available on the QCC web site. locations. Notification letters and the public notice advised the public that the ANEF was not available electronically. 4 Item 1. Extraordinary Meeting – 17 November 2010 Draft Queanbeyan Local Environmental Plan (South Tralee) 2010 (Ref: SF090104; Author: Carswell) (Continued) 1.13 Safety risks Safety is a Commonwealth Government responsibility. As There are safety risks to development within flight paths: such it would be expected that any future residents of - Planning for take-off and landings will be more difficult South Tralee and/or pilots using Canberra Airport would - Potential for greater impact on residents if an accident does be afforded the same degree of protection as occur (result from increased pilot demands and residential residents/pilots in similar situations. However at the same under approaches etc) time it needs to be noted that the Draft Plan and - Adverse impact on aviation safety and pilot workload from endorsed Queanbeyan Residential and Economic the increase in arrangements to vector aircraft in the event Strategy 2031 propose large open space areas in a north- Tralee is developed for residential south direction which could be used in an emergency. - Proposal is unnecessarily removing a safety zone for aircraft during takeoff and landing. 1.14 Health risks Environmental impacts from aircraft movements are a Health risk for schools within Flight Path. Commonwealth Government responsibility. As such it would be expected that any future residents of South Tralee would be afforded the same degree of protection as residents in similar situations. In regard to impacts from aircraft noise any school will have to be insulated to Australian Standard AS 2021 interior noise compliance standards and the Draft Plan more than complies with the NSW standard for aircraft noise. 1.15 Health risks See comment 1.14. Potential for adverse health impacts if residential and other community and outdoor recreation uses are located under the flight path, including air and noise pollution, aircraft fuel. 1.16 Flight Path complaints Submissions confirm this, however this is not widely Aircraft over flights often result in residents up to 30kms away accepted in the South Jerrabomberra Valley. lodging complaints. 1.17 Prior relocation of Flight Paths Council is aware of this. Flight paths were moved away from Jerrabomberra & South Tralee for Runway 17 following consultation with the community representatives, aircraft operators and the airport; 5 Item 1. Extraordinary Meeting – 17 November 2010 Draft Queanbeyan Local Environmental Plan (South Tralee) 2010 (Ref: SF090104; Author: Carswell) (Continued) 1.18 Adverse impacts on existing residential areas Submissions confirm this. Jerrabomberra, Royalla and Fernleigh residents have complained and resulted in changes to flight paths affecting other residents elsewhere. 1.19 Adverse impacts on existing residential
Recommended publications
  • NSW HRSI NEWS April 2016
    NSW HRSI NEWSLETTER Issue 7 HRSI NSW HRSI NEWS April 2016 A view of the worn out Taleeban railway station as seen in 1979 (Gordon Ross collection) NSW HERITAGE RAILWAY STATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE NEWS ISSUE N.7 WELCOME to the seventh important tourist aspect which Paterson (vale), Adrian newsletter of NSWHRSI. The generates interest for some further Compton, Philip Vergison, Mark objective of this newsletter is to tourists to come and see what’s left Zanker, Peter Enlund, Jim inform, educate and provide of NSW railway. Lippitts, Douglas Moyle, William insights about the latest updates, Carter, Ken Sauerbier, Weston plans and heritage news relating to Phil Buckley, NSW HRSI Editor Langford, Temora Shire Council. Heritage Railway Stations and Infrastructure (HRSI) across NSW. Copyright © 2014 - 2016 NSWHRSI . The news in is separated into 4 core All photos and information remains Newsletter index NSW regions – Northern, Western property of NSWHRSI / Phil Buckley and Southern NSW and Sydney. unless stated to our various WELCOME / MAIN NEWS 1 contributors / original photographers or donors. MAIN NEWS CULCAIRN TO COROWA RAILWAY BRANCH LINE REVIEW – PART 2 2 PAINT IT. Sydney Trains and Northern NSW reporters – TrainsLink NSW and John Holland Gordon Ross 5 MINUTES WITH ….PETER BURR 16 Rail have been busy last year and into 2016 repainting, upgrading and Western NSW reporters – Phil NORTHERN NSW 20 maintaining many heritage railway Pedley stations across Sydney and NSW. WESTERN NSW 22 This indicates signs of good social Southern NSW reporters – Greg and heritage responsibility by the Finster, Angela Rodwell SOUTHERN NSW 29 NSW Government in protecting its current heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • South Tralee Supplementary Report to Les Acoustic
    Consultants in Acoustics, Vibration & Structural Dynamics email: [email protected] website: www.renzotonin.com.au SOUTH TRALEE SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT TO LES ACOUSTIC REVIEW TE543-02F02 (REV 3) SUPPLEMENTARY LES 27 JULY 2010 Prepared for: Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd Ste 604, Level 6, 267 Castlereagh Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Attention: Mr Mark Adams Sydney (Head Office) Melbourne Renzo Tonin & Associates (NSW) Pty Ltd Member of the Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants Brisbane ABN 29 117 462 861 1/418A Elizabeth St., SURRY HILLS, NSW 2010 Gold Coast PO Box 877 STRAWBERRY HILLS, NSW 2012 Ph (02) 8218 0500 Fax (02) 8218 0501 Kuwait DOCUMENT CONTROL Non- Reviewed & Issued Prepared By Instructed By Date Revision History Issued Authorised by Revision (initials) (initials) Revision (initials) 22/06/10 Draft report - 0 TG TG TG 17/07/10 Final draft report 1 2 TG TG PK 27/07/10 Final Report - 3 TG TG TG The work presented in this document was carried out in accordance with the Renzo Tonin & Associates Quality Assurance System, which is based on Australian Standard / NZS ISO 9001. This document is issued subject to review and authorisation by the Team Leader noted by the initials printed in the last column above. If no initials appear, this document shall be considered as preliminary or draft only and no reliance shall be placed upon it other than for information to be verified later. This document is prepared for our Client's particular requirements which are based on a specific brief with limitations as agreed to with the Client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by a third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party without prior consent provided by Renzo Tonin & Associates.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Transport Timetables & Information
    2021 TRANSPORT TIMETABLES & INFORMATION Transport NSW TrainLink 132 232 TRAIN SERVICE Departs Arrives Bus Arrives / Departs Bookings can be made at NewsExpress Departs CANBERRA COOMA BERRIDALE JINDABYNE DALGETY BOMBALA THREDBO Cooma Booking Fees Apply CENTRAL SYD CIVIC SEE Daily Service 771 Service 631 6.18pm (a) SNOWLINK Centennial Park (Sydney to Eden Service) 12.08pm 4.20pm 6.48pm (d) SHUTTLE Bombala St, Cooma Mon-Wed-Fri 775 Service 663 SERVICE Centennial Park (Sydney to Bombala Service) 6.58am 11.55am 1.30pm 2.02pm 2.26pm 3.00pm 4.00pm FROM Bombala St, Cooma SNOWLINER SCHOOLBUS Cooma Jindabyne Central School One Way to Jindabyne Adult $12 / Conc $10 School Days Only - Contact 6452 1584 6.05am 6.55am Pickup Outside Target, Sharp Street Bookings Essential NSW School Holidays service DOES NOT operate 3.40pm 4.30pm Pickup St Pats / Cooma Public School Services are also available to and from Adaminaby, Berridale, Dalgety and Nimmitabel COOMA COACHES SCHOOLBUS Cooma - Bombala Street Jindabyne Central School SNOWLINK SHUTTLE SERVICE TO & FROM THREDBO School Days Only - Contact 6452 4841 7.30am 8.30am Snowlink meet Cooma Coaches at Jindabyne Central School NSW School Holidays service DOES NOT operate 7:45am 8.50am for those wishing to go to Thredbo Adult One Way $19 Return $23 2.15pm 3.20pm Booking Essential - Jindabyne to Thredbo Adult One Way $50 Adult Return $65 Services are also available to and from Adaminaby, Berridale, Dalgety and Nimmitabel V-LINE BUSES 1800 800 007 Canberra Cooma Bairnsdale Traralgon Melbourne Bus Arrives / Departs
    [Show full text]
  • RAIL TRAILS for NSW ABN 43 863 190 337 - a Not for Profit Charity
    RAIL TRAILS FOR NSW ABN 43 863 190 337 - A Not for Profit Charity Chairman John Moore OAM RFD ED M. 0403 160 750 [email protected] Deputy Chairman Tim Coen B.Com. M. 0408 691 541 [email protected] Website: railtrailsnsw.com.au facebook: Facebook.com/railtrailsnsw NSW will generate up to $74 million every year create up to 290 jobs revitalise 90+ regional communities by building these tourism assets Submission for the 2020 NSW Budget Rail Trails for NSW August 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This submission champions 11 high quality tourist trail projects for regional NSW totalling 884 kilometres of safe, scenic, vehicle-free pathway on publicly owned, decades out of service, regional rail corridors. There are no prospects for re-activated train services along any of the nominated routes. Rail Trails for NSW urges the State Government to seek co-contributions from the Australian Government for the projects. The building of these tourist trails will provide: • Fiscal stimulus of up to $3.3 million for feasibility and other pre-construction studies and planning • Fiscal stimulus during the trail construction phase of up to $271,250,000 • Upon completion; o All 14 regional trails will generate additional local visitor spending estimated conservatively at $27 million p.a. building to $74 million p.a. o Steadily create up to 111 jobs building to 297 or more local jobs as visitor numbers grow o facilitate new business and employment opportunities in their host regions o provide community, health and exercise resources for locals o enable social benefits by generating community resilience, hope and optimism o stimulus of up to $2.75 million via marketing and promotion activities These 11 additional rail trails warranting immediate attention (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • NSW HRSI NEWS August 2019
    NSWHRSI NEWSLETTER Issue 20 HRSI NSW HRSI NEWS August 2019 Mark Zanker view of Muttama railway station 1976, Tumut branch line. NSW HERITAGE RAILWAY STATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE NEWS ISSUE N.20 WELCOME to the 20th newsletter Library collection, Warren Banfield, Newsletter index of NSWHRSI. The objective of this Greg Finster collection, Trove, Kim WELCOME / MAIN NEWS 1 newsletter is to inform, educate Baillie, Bryce Hockings, Dorothy Whiterod, Mary Wood, Anne Denison, and provide insights about the INTERVIEW WITH DAVID MCGRATH 2 latest updates, plans and heritage Chris Collins, Alison Lane, John Buckland, Robert Patterson, Leon news relating to Heritage Railway Rudd, Steve Bucton, David Nelson, INVERELL BRANCH LINE REVIEW 9 Stations and Infrastructure (HRSI) John Denis, State Records NSW, Brett across NSW. The news in is Leslie, Peter Burr, Mark Zanker. TICKETS TO RIDE 29 separated into 4 core NSW regions – Northern, Western and Southern HILLSTON RAILWAY STATION 30 NSW and Sydney. STATION HERITAGE FACTS 38 MAIN NEWS NSWS NEWS 39 Phil Buckley, NSW HRSI Editor NORTHERN NSW 39 Copyright © 2014 - 2019 NSWHRSI . WESTERN NSW 54 All photos and information remains property of NSWHRSI / Phil Buckley SOUTHERN NSW 58 unless stated to our various contributors / original photographers SYDNEY REGION 63 or donors. YOUR SAY - HERITAGE PHOTOS 77 Credits/Contributors this issue – SLNSW Archives, Ian Stephens, OTHER NEWS, NEXT ISSUE AND LINKS 78 Graeme Skeet, Matthew Ramsey, Jim Leppitts, Toad Montgomery, Simon Barber, Barry Trudgett, Australian Rail Maps, Alan Holding, Nigel Judd, Garrett Ptolemy Xvi Fitzgerald, Griffith Page | 1 NSWHRSI NEWSLETTER Issue 20 INTERVIEW WITH DAVID MCGRATH I started my career with the then Public Transport Commission of N.S.W 16th July 1977 and finished 10th January 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • New Sydney and NSW Bus and Rail Timetables RAIL and TRAM NEWS Share' of Driving Trips Fell from 64.2% to 60.2% in the Decade
    AUSTRALASIAN TIMETABLE NEWS No. 254, October 2013 ISSN 1038-3697 RRP $4.95 Published by the Australian Association of Timetable Collectors www.aattc.org.au New Sydney and NSW bus and rail timetables RAIL AND TRAM NEWS share' of driving trips fell from 64.2% to 60.2% in the decade. Brisbane Underground Sydney residents in their 40s and 50s are also driving less The Queensland government is considering a plan to build a but the trend is not as pronounced and residents in their 60s rail and bus tunnel from the south side of the Brisbane River and 70s are, on average, driving slightly more. to George St in the City as a cheaper alternative to the now defunct Cross River Rail project (underground from Bowen ''The whole value proposition of a car is not what it used to Hills to Salisbury) It is understood the project will be paid for be for young people,'' said Garry Glazebrook, of the by the State government and the private sector. Premier University of Technology, Sydney. ''It's not the ticket to Campbell Newman said the Brisbane Underground proposal freedom it once was. And, in the inner suburbs, it is almost a would cost "billions" of dollars less than Cross River Rail. He menace because you can't find somewhere to park.'' said construction would begin "within the next few years". Fairfax Media asked the bureau to break down the most Cross River Rail had an initial price tag of $8 billion but the recent transport mode share figures by age and geography.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter December 2017
    Newsletter December 2017 Our Mission Statement: We wish to put the disused Monaro rail way line to productive use as a recreational trail for cycling and in doing so boost tourism, the economy and the well being of the region. At the same time, we wish to preserve the old rail buildings, bridges and the Colinton tunnel that are part of the Monaro rail history NSW NSW Govt and rail trail tourism. Government handling of rail trail development has been less than heartening. In 2014 it allocated $50m for rail trails, however all but $45m was used for regional airport development and the remaining $5 million was allocated for use on the Tumbarumba to Rosewood rail trail. That money remains unused as the government administration moves at a glacial pace and construction of this project approved in July 2015 is yet to commence. Somewhat more heartening to see is new work by policy writers and planners within the NSW Govt who are currently preparing a vision statement on how unused transport infrastructure can be used to support tourism growth. The framework for this vision includes finding alternative uses for currently unused assets in road, marine and rail infrastructure. Regional cycle tourism is specifically mentioned in relation to the statement “NSW has 3100 km of non- operational rail lines that can be developed for social and economic benefits for regional NSW” The vision paper “ Future Transport 2056” has been available to review at https://future.transport.nsw.gov.au/react-feedback/supporting-plans/tourism-transport- plan/11-transport-infrastructure/ The NSW electorate of Monaro tends to be a closely contested seat.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    5896 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thursday 24 October 2002 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Henry Murray) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. COASTAL PROTECTION AMENDMENT BILL In Committee Consideration of the Legislative Council's amendments. Schedule of amendments referred to in message of 23 October. No. 1 Page 2, clause 2, lines 5 and 6. Omit all words on those lines. Insert instead: This Act commences on the day that is 3 months after the date of assent. No. 2 Page 2, clause 4. Omit the clause. No. 3 Page 3, Schedule 1. Insert after line 2: [1] Section 3 Insert after section 2: 3 Objects of this Act The objects of this Act are to provide for the protection of the coastal environment of the State for the benefit of both present and future generations and, in particular: (a) to protect, enhance, maintain and restore the environment of the coastal region, its associated ecosystems, ecological processes and biological diversity, and its water quality, and (b) to encourage, promote and secure the orderly and balanced utilisation and conservation of the coastal region and its natural and man-made resources, having regard to the principles of ecologically sustainable development, and (c) to recognise and foster the significant social and economic benefits to the State that result from a sustainable coastal environment, including: (i) benefits to the environment, and (ii) benefits to urban communities, fisheries, industry and recreation, and (iii) benefits to culture and heritage, and (iv) benefits to the Aboriginal people
    [Show full text]
  • The Railway Heritage of Bathurst and District
    THE RAILWAY HERITAGE OF BATHURST AND DISTRICT NOTES FOR A TOUR BY THE AUSTRALIAN RAILWAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY OCTOBER, 2013 Stuart Sharp July, 2013 1 MAIN LINE STATION DESIGN POLICIES John Whitton, the Engineer-in-Chief, approved the plan for Rydal station. It was the first example of a new type of combined office and residence, a building type the NSW Railways had used since 1855 for small communities. Whitton revised the design of platform buildings he had been using after the trunk lines after he had completed the designs for Marulan in 1868, Bowenfels in 1869 and Murrrundi in 1871. Interestingly, he did not use a consistent design policy for the three main lines. He spent the public’s money in different ways. On the Main South, he used temporary platform buildings to a very large degree. Yes, Goulburn got a magnificent but relatively small building in 1869 but that and at Bathurst in 1876 was the only time before 1880 that lavish amounts of money was allocated to platform buildings on new lines. Even at Bathurst, Whitton did not complete the building before the opening of the line, completion taking another six months On the Main North, he reduced the length of his standard Georgian design and applied this design to a far greater degree than the other trunk lines, such as at Muswellbrook, Scone and Murrurundi. He decided not to spend any great amount of funds on platform buildings before 1880. For the Main West, Whitton used combined offices/residences to an extant greater than the other trunk lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD)
    Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Snowy Mountains Special Activation Precinct Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) Technical Report D Squared Consulting Pty Ltd FINAL Trading as dsquared ACN 159 612 067 ABN 38 159 612 067 Suite 5, 241 Pirie Street Adelaide SA 5000 T: 0425 870 289 E: [email protected] W: www.dsquaredconsulting.com.au Project Number: 2134 Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................5 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 17 1.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 17 1.2 How to read this report ..................................................................................................................... 17 1.3 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 17 1.4 Study area .......................................................................................................................................... 18 1.5 Regional appreciation .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rha-Newsletter-21
    Rail Heritage Australia (NSW) Inc Representing Rail Heritage Organisations in NSW Correspondence to: The Secretary, PO Box 152 www.rha-nsw.org.au West Pennant Hills NSW 2125 Email: secretary@rha -nsw.org.au Newsletter – February 2016 IN THIS ISSUE Patron The Hon Tim Fischer • RHA (NSW) 2015 AGM • Zig Zag Railway - Update RHA (NSW) – Member groups • ATHRA – Maintenance Code of Practice 3801 Limited Binnaway Rail Heritage and Preservation Group Inc • ATHRA – Board Meeting 27 February 2016 Dorrigo Steam Railway and Museum Ltd • DEB Set Restoration Goulburn Crookwell Heritage Railway Inc • Robertson Heritage Railway Station – Goulburn Loco Roundhouse Preservation Society Inc Successful Grant Applications. Hunter Valley Training Company Pty Ltd • Fire destroys heritage trams and buses Illawarra Light Railway Museum Society Ltd • Lachlan Valley Railway Society Co-op Ltd Streamliners 2016 New England Railway Inc NSW Rail Motor & Rollingstock Preservation Assn Inc Oberon Tarana Heritage Railway Inc AIL HERITAGE AUSTRALIA Pacific Coast Railway Society Inc (NSW) ANNUAL GENERAL Regional Heritage Transport Association – Junee Inc MEETING – Committee of (incorporating Tumba Rail) th RManagement. The 11 Annual Richmond Vale Preservation Co-operative Society Ltd General meeting of RHA (NSW) was held on 3 Robertson Heritage Railway Station Inc December 2015 at Club Redfern. In Rothbury Riot Railway and Steam Museum Group Ltd South Pacific Electric Railway Co-op Soc Ltd accordance with the Rules, five positions on Steam Tram and Railway Preservation (Co-op) Soc Ltd the Committee of Management fell vacant at Transport, Signalling and Communications Museum Inc the meeting and member groups had been Zig Zag Railway Co-op Ltd asked to make nominations for the filling of those positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Royalla Woolshed (Part of Rural Block 1512, Tuggeranong)
    SEPTEMBER 2019 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ROYALLA WOOLSHED (PART OF RURAL BLOCK 1512, TUGGERANONG) At its meeting of 19 September 2019 the ACT Heritage Council decided that the Royalla Woolshed was eligible for provisional registration. The information contained in this report was considered by the ACT Heritage Council in assessing the nomination for the Royalla Woolshed against the heritage significance criteria outlined in s10 of the Heritage Act 2004. BACKGROUND Constructed in 1907 the Royalla Woolshed is located on the western side of the Monaro Highway and adjacent railway line. The Highway is the main travel route between Canberra and Cooma and is an important road servicing Canberra’s southern suburbs. The Bombala railway line, which was an extension from near Goulburn to Bombala, was completed in stages between Queanbeyan and Cooma from 1887 to 1888. Only portions of this line remain open, and the passenger service south of Queanbeyan (through Royalla) ended in 1988. In the Royalla area, the rail line delineates the ACT - NSW border, with the western side being the ACT. Located within the ACT, the Royalla Woolshed is very close to the rail and road transport corridor and is highly visible to passing motorists. (Moore 1981: 47) Prior to the resumption of land into the ACT, the Royalla Woolshed was located within Portion 174, Parish of Burra, in the County of Murray. When the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) was announced part of portion 174 fell within the new territory and became known as Holding 222 Lanyon. On the 25 July 1977 Holding 222 Lanyon was formally resumed into the ACT at which time it was noted as being 127.8 hectares; it was initially known as Rural Block 86, then 1249 and is currently part of Rural Block 1512, Tuggeranong.
    [Show full text]