DOCSLIB.ORG

Whatever Happened to Frank and Fearless? the Impact of New Public Management on the Australian Public Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whatever Happened to Frank and Fearless? the Impact of New Public Management on the Australian Public Service Whatever Happened to Frank and Fearless? The impact of new public management on the Australian Public Service Whatever Happened to Frank and Fearless? The impact of new public management on the Australian Public Service Kathy MacDermott Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/frank_fearless_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: MacDermott, Kathy. Title: Whatever happened to frank and fearless? : the impact of the new public service management on the Australian public service / Kathy MacDermott. ISBN: 9781921313912 (pbk.) 9781921313929 (web) Series: ANZSOG series Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Civil service--Australia. Public administration--Australia. Australia--Politics and government. Dewey Number: 351.94 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher. Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG). He is also a joint appointment with the Department of Politics and Public Policy at Griffith University and a principal researcher with two research centres: the Governance and Public Policy Research Centre and the nationally- funded Key Centre in Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance at Griffith University. Professor Wanna has produced around 17 books including two national text books on policy and public management. He has produced a number of research-based studies on budgeting and financial management including: Budgetary Management and Control (1990); Managing Public Expenditure (2000), From Accounting to Accountability (2001) and, most recently, Controlling Public Expenditure (2003). He has just completed a study of state level leadership covering all the state and territory leaders — entitled Yes Premier: Labor leadership in Australia’s states and territories — and has edited a book on Westminster Legacies in Asia and the Pacific —Westminster Legacies: Democracy and responsible government in Asia and the Pacific. He was a chief investigator in a major Australian Research Council funded study of the Future of Governance in Australia (1999-2001) involving Griffith and the ANU. His research interests include Australian and comparative politics, public expenditure and budgeting, and government-business relations. He also writes on Australian politics in newspapers such as The Australian, Courier-Mail and The Canberra Times and has been a regular state political commentator on ABC radio and TV. Table of Contents Author Profile ix Acknowledgements xi Foreword xiii Overview xv Chapter 1. A failure of public administration? 1 Chapter 2. The regime of contestability 25 Chapter 3. Individual performance management and assessment and `assumption cultures' 43 Chapter 4. Devolution 69 Chapter 5. Aligning the service: the impact of workplace relations 89 Chapter 6. To market, to market: outsourcing the public service 109 Chapter 7. Reforming the reforms? 129 References 137 Appendix: Extract from Chronology no. 1 2002-03 Ð Changes in the Australian Public Service 1975-2003 151 vii Author Profile Dr Kathy MacDermott has taught in universities in Australia and the United States. More recently, she has worked in the senior executive service of the Australian Public Service in industrial relations policy and public sector governance, and has published in these areas. Her responsibilities have included managing evaluations of how the APS Values and Code of Conduct have been applied in practice and the conduct of the annual State of the Service report. ix Acknowledgements I would like to thank Andrew Podger for reading and rereading the manuscript and providing valuable and patient commentary, John Nethercote for his thorough comments and suggestions, and David Webster for his persistent contribution to quality control. Thanks too to the two anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions have contributed to shaping the final product. I would also like to thank the State of the Service team for the important research that they have made publicly available. More generally, I would also like to acknowledge the influence of many public servants with whom I have worked, who continue to struggle with these issues every day and who care about personal and public integrity. Discussions with these people lie behind the hypothetical cases raised in the book. Discussions with Amy Webster and Sarah Webster lie behind the desire to write it in the first place. I am also grateful to ANZSOG and, especially, to John Wanna and John Butcher for their advice throughout the process and to Anne Gelling for her editorial assistance. xi Foreword Dr Kathy MacDermott's monograph sets out a series of controversial arguments that challenge some widely and strongly held views. Many, like me, continue to regard the New Public Management reforms of the 1980s and 1990s in Australia as groundbreaking, demonstrating how the public sector can deliver efficient and effective services in an internationally competitive economy. Many also of my vintage and older continue to view favourably the Coombs Royal Commission's other two emphases on responsiveness to the elected government and community participation in government, reinforcing democratic principles and breaking down the hegemony of the public service. And there are strong adherents of the more recent emphasis on performance management and workplace reform. MacDermott does not oppose these reforms, but questions how some have been applied in practice and how they have cumulatively re-positioned public servants and their relationship with the political arm of government. In doing so, some leaders of the reforms will no doubt feel somewhat uncomfortable about aspects of MacDermott's analysis. This monograph is important. It does not suggest turning back the clock, but seeks reconsideration of some of the effects of the reforms of the last 25 years. Have some gone too far? Have we lost sight of the idealistic aspirations behind some of the reforms? Have there been unintended consequences from some initiatives? Have we let the rhetoric run away from the reality? Importantly, MacDermott looks at the reforms from the perspective of public servants down the line, not just departmental secretaries. What is the context in which they now operate and what behaviours do they believe the system expects of them today? In particular, are they encouraged to be responsive to the point where they compromise their duty to be apolitical and impartial and concerned for the public interest? Some of the challenges MacDermott identifies are: · the extent to which contestability of policy advice is improving the contest for ideas or enhancing the ability of governments to find the advice they want; · the extent to which performance management is improving organisational performance or reinforcing pressure to conform; · the extent to which devolution has enhanced flexibility to deliver better results or has involved a trade-off of policy influence for managerial control, with public servants subject to closer direction by both managers and by ministerial advisers and ministers; xiii Whatever Happened to Frank and Fearless? · the extent to which workforce reforms in the public sector have increased flexibility and enhanced employees' capacity to identify with and contribute to organisational objectives, or have disempowered employees, discouraged teamwork and reduced innovation and professional autonomy; · the extent to which outsourcing has improved efficiency and effectiveness through competition or has undermined altruism and concern for the public interest both within the public service and amongst the non-government sector. I do not agree with all of MacDermott's conclusions, although I know of real instances that are consistent with almost all of her hypothetical cases and I know well that the APS Commission survey data confirm widespread unease amongst public servants. In a few cases, however, I think that unease is just misplaced; in other cases, there is indeed supporting evidence reinforcing the need to revisit current practice, for example in performance management and workplace relations. More generally, MacDermott's plea for a firmer focus on public value strikes a chord with me. Public servants do want to serve the elected government, but they want to be recognised by government and the public for their contribution to the public interest by their professionalism. The opportunity to serve the public remains the greatest attraction to join the public service, and the greatest motivator to perform. If not managed appropriately some of the reforms, notwithstanding their intrinsic merits, do present a danger of undermining this fundamental value which drives the public service. Andrew Podger xiv Overview Under s.10(1)(a) of the Public Service Act 1999 (hereafter referred to as the Public Service Act) the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sharon Pickering (2005) Refugees and State Crime, the Federation Press, Sydney, ISBN: 1 86287 541 3
    Sharon Pickering (2005) Refugees and State Crime, The Federation Press, Sydney, ISBN: 1 86287 541 3 Unlike 2001, the 2004 federal election was not primarily fought around racist images of boatloads of refugees 'invading' Australia's shores. However, the detention and mistreatment of mentally ill Australian resident Cornelia Rau, the Federal Government's intensifying and largely unreported program of forced deportations, 1 the unlawful deportation of Australian citizen Vivian Solon and the deaths in custody of 13 immigration detainees since December 2000 reflect the ongoing human rights violations committed b~ the Australian state against 'unlawful' migrants. With the findings of the Palmer Inquiry likely to generate further much-needed critical debate, Sharon Pickering's book is a timely reminder of the dismal reality of Australia's border protection policies and one of the few serious attempts by criminologists to analyse the Australian state's responses to forced migration.3 Pickering describes her task as 'mapping the construction of refugee deviancy and how the ensuing state response can be considered illegitimate and potentially criminal' (p l ). She starts by locating Australia's refugee policy within the wider law and order discourse entrenched by neo-liberalism throughout the Global North. ln this context, refugees seeking asylum outside of the Australian Government's tightly prescribed legal framework arc acting simply out of choice and must suffer the consequences if their gamble fails. Moreover, the very fact of them attempting to exercise their rights under international Jaw qualifies them as dangerous and triggers state-driven processes of exclusion and criminalisation, which help construct and rely upon rationales for ignoring human rights obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Royal Commission Into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability
    Submission to the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability Submission on laws, policies and practice affecting migrants, refugees and citizens from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds January 2021 Sydney Centre for International Law The University of Sydney Law School Building (F10) Camperdown Campus, The University of Sydney NSW 2006 [email protected] With Macquarie Law School Social Justice Clinic About the Sydney Centre for International Law The Sydney Centre for International Law (SCIL) was established in 2003 as a centre of excellence in research and teaching in international law. The centre fosters innovative, interdisciplinary scholarship across the international legal field, and also provides an avenue for the public to access international legal expertise. It operates within the University of Sydney Law School, building upon its well-recognised history of strength in this area. This submission was prepared by the following SCIL interns under the supervision and with the assistance of SCIL Director Professor Mary Crock. Parts 1 – 3; Part 10 Sarah Charak*; Wendy Chen*; Angus Chen*; Sherry Xueyi Jin; John McCrorie*; Leah Park; Rachel Sun*; Emma Louise Tirabosco;* Siobhan Walsh; Frank Gang Yang. Parts 4 - 6 Freya Appleford*; Sarah Charak; Angus Chen; Jake Jerogin*; Emma Kench*; Maxine McHugh; Miranda Hutchenson; Anton Nguyen*; Alexandra Touw; Jiann Yap; Alan Zheng*; Kevin Zou*; Part 7 Jess Mitchell*; Anisha Gunawardhana*; Part 8 Mary Crock; Olivia Morris; Part 9 Mary Crock with Macquarie University Law School Social Justice Clinic and the National Justice Project– Associate Professor Daniel Ghezelbash; Thomas Boyes, Sarah Croake, Jemy Ma; and Sara Hakim* (as a volunteer at the National Justice Project).
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee Inquiry Into The
    Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee Inquiry into the administration and operation of the Migration Act By Angus Francisi Introduction This submission focuses on the first term of reference of the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee Inquiry into the administration and operation of the Migration Act. In particular, this submission focuses on the administration and operation of the detention and removal powers of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (‘MA’). The Cornelia Rau and Vivian Solon cases highlight the failure of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (‘DIMIA’) to properly administer the detention and removal powers found in the MA. According to Mick Palmer, the head of the government initiated inquiry into the detention of Cornelia Rau, this is a result of inadequate training, insufficient internal controls, lack of management oversight and review, a failure of co-ordination between Federal, State and non-government agencies, as well as a culture within the compliance and detention sections of DIMIA that is ‘overly self-protective and defensive’.ii The Palmer Report unearthed what has laid stagnant on the surface of earlier public inquiries into the operation of the MA: an attitude within government that the powers to detain and remove unlawful non-citizens are wide and unfettered. This attitude is evident in the way in which the detention and removal powers in the MA are often exercised without due regard or concern for the individual subject to those powers. This position is unlikely to change, even if, as inquiry head Mick Palmer recommended, effective personnel and cultural change takes place within DIMIA.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Action in Support of Asylum Seekers in Australia 2001-2006
    ‘I had to do something. I couldn’t do nothing!’: Citizen Action in Support of Asylum Seekers in Australia 2001-2006. Diane Gosden Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social Sciences Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of New South Wales 2012 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: GOSDEN First name: DIANE Other name/s: MARGARET Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: School of Social Sciences Faculty: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Title: 'I had to do something. I couldn't do nothing!': Citizen Action in Support of Asylum Seekers in Australia 2001-2006 Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) This thesis is an examination of social action opposed to particular Australian government policies. The policies concerned are those affecting people seeking asylum without authorised entry documents. The period examined is from 2001 to 2006. It is argued that the social action contributed to the achievement of shifts in public opinion and policy during this period. The context in which this local action is examined is the international system of asylum, and the responses of developed countries to flows of incoming asylum seekers. Political rhetoric has often demonised those seeking asylum, and the term 'asylum seeker' increasingly has negative connotations for many people in developed countries. At the same time, groups of people in asylum destination countries such as Australia, have also responded with support and assistance for asylum seekers. Using ethnographic methodology and drawing on theories from refugee studies, and collective action and social movement theory, this thesis explores the nature of this particular response.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Has an Appalling History of Mismanagement of Welfare Issues Relating to People Detained in Its Immigration Centres
    Macquarie Law Journal (2005) Vol 5 81 CONTRACTUALISM, EXCLUSION AND ‘MADNESS’ IN AUSTRALIA’S ‘OUTSOURCED WASTELANDS’ ∗ LYNDA CROWLEY-CYR I INTRODUCTION Australia has an appalling history of mismanagement of welfare issues relating to people detained in its immigration centres. How is this possible in the ‘lucky country’ where Australians pride themselves on mateship and giving everyone ‘a fair go’? Theories of contemporary contractualism1 offer one possible explanation. Most concepts of the state2 assume statehood involves certain functions. This article deals with the way that different facets of the state - especially its market, fortress and security facets - have fused together to manage ‘wasted lives’3 in detention centres in Australia. This fusion of the state has converted ‘illegal outsiders’ (asylum seekers and refugees) into ‘rightless’ homines sacri.4 My intention is to use contemporary contractualism as the lens through which we can consider how the state has failed to discharge its obligations to detainees under its care. Contemporary contractualism is an ideology that legitimates exclusion by limiting its process to the purchase of outputs rather than the delivery of outcomes.5 This is a ∗ LLB (QUT), LLM (JCU), James Cook University. This article is based on a paper presented at the British Criminology Conference, Leeds, 12-14 July 2005. My special thanks to Professor Paul Havemann and Carole Caple for their invaluable assistance in the development of the ideas in this article. 1 I use the term ‘contemporary contractualism’ here to refer to transactions that can appear contractual in nature but that do not necessarily draw on the principles of contract law as traditionally understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Report by 15 March 2007, on the Recommendation of the Selection of Bills Committee
    The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration Human Services (Enhanced Service Delivery) Bill 2007 [Provisions] March 2007 © Commonwealth of Australia 2007 ISBN 978-0-642-71781-8 Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee Members Senator Brett Mason, Chair Queensland, LP Senator Michael Forshaw, Deputy Chair New South Wales, ALP Senator Carol Brown Tasmania, ALP Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells New South Wales, LP Senator Mitch Fifield Victoria, LP Senator Claire Moore Queensland, ALP Senator Andrew Murray Western Australia, AD Senator John Watson Tasmania, LP Substitute Member Senator Stott Despoja to replace Senator Murray for the Committee's inquiry into the provisions of the Human Services (Enhanced Service Delivery) Bill 2007 Participating Member involved in the inquiry Senator Kate Lundy Secretariat Mr Alistair Sands, Secretary Mr Terry Brown, Principal Research Officer Ms Monika Kruesmann, Principal Research Officer Ms Sharon Babyack, Estimates/Research Officer Ms Emma Hardman, Executive Assistant Ms Judith Wuest, Executive Assistant PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Ph: 02 6277 3540 Fax: 02 6277 5719 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate_fpa iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of Committee iii Chapter 1 1 Introduction Background 1 Purpose of the bill 1 Conduct of the Inquiry 2 Acknowledgement 3 Note on references 3 Chapter 2 5 Overview of the bill Provisions of the bill 5 Chapter 3 11 Key issues
    [Show full text]
  • The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010
    The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 Edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/rudd_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Rudd government : Australian Commonwealth administration 2007 - 2010 / edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans. ISBN: 9781921862069 (pbk.) 9781921862076 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Rudd, Kevin, 1957---Political and social views. Australian Labor Party. Public administration--Australia. Australia--Politics and government--2001- Other Authors/Contributors: Aulich, Chris, 1947- Evans, Mark Dr. Dewey Number: 324.29407 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by ANU E Press Illustrations by David Pope, The Canberra Times Printed by Griffin Press Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Contributors . ix Part I. Introduction 1 . It was the best of times; it was the worst of times . 3 Chris Aulich 2 . Issues and agendas for the term . 17 John Wanna Part II. The Institutions of Government 3 . The Australian Public Service: new agendas and reform . 35 John Halligan 4 . Continuity and change in the outer public sector .
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Activism: Creating Legal and Social Change for Children in Immigration Detention
    THE POWER OF ACTIVISM: CREATING LEGAL AND SOCIAL CHANGE FOR CHILDREN IN IMMIGRATION DETENTION SANDY SANDHYA JACKSON A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SYDNEY LAW SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY 2020 ABSTRACT In February 2019, the Australian government announced that there were no longer any children in offshore immigration detention. The influence of the Australian refugee advocacy movement on this outcome is important to understand because of its relevance to the global refugee crisis in which children continue to be detained across the world. My thesis examines how the Australian refugee advocacy movement has tried to create legal and social change for children in immigration detention using strategic litigation and grassroots advocacy. Cases are analysed to critically evaluate the success of lawyers in the courtroom to challenge an intransigent government determined to pursue its harsh policies. The mass mobilisation of activists and their efforts to shift public and political opinion are also examined. Drawing on the wider socio‐legal literature and notably the work of McCann, the integrated legal mobilisation framework is proposed. It consists of capabilities and practical grassroots strategies, and provides an in‐depth and evidenced way of understanding the influence of the Australian refugee advocacy movement in helping to achieve the release of children from immigration detention. Data from 41 interviews from refugee advocacy groups, activists, lawyers, doctors, journalists, bureaucrats, policy advisors, and politicians are used to evaluate how the capabilities and strategies have been used by the refugee advocacy movement to help create legal and social change for children in immigration detention.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers Impelling Agencies to Digitise
    The Evidence in Plain Sight: Drivers Impelling Agencies to Digitise NOVEMBER 2020 Foreword I’d like to thank Intermedium for the opportunity to sponsor this paper capturing the digital imperative for the public sector, which has been made acute by the unprecedented speed, scale and flexibility challenges of COVID-19. The drivers identified in this paper echo the feedback we are hearing from the experiences of our government customers. Salesforce is delighted to partner with both Intermedium and Government as we work towards further empowering the Australian public service to address the policy and service delivery challenges of the ‘new normal’. Barry Dietrich General Manager & Senior Vice President, Public Sector APAC, Salesforce The Evidence in Plain Sight: Drivers Impelling Agencies to Digitise | PAGE 2 Introduction 2020 is the year most of us would like to forget. Prolonged drought, horrific bushfires and floods followed by the outbreak of COVID-19 has led to estimates1 that the total level of debt under the Coalition Government will surpass $1 trillion1, creating an enduring deficit situation that will have implications for Federal and State agency administrative funding for years to come. The collective impact of this rolling wave of disasters has caused all Australian jurisdictions to rethink their business models, particularly with regard to services to citizens and businesses. The terms ‘pivot’ and ‘agility’ are now firmly embedded in the dialogue regarding the imagined post COVID-19 ‘new normal’. Front and centre of that pivot is the heightened emphasis on the digitisation of services to not only citizens, but also now to businesses. “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has reminded us of the increasing reliance we have on technology in our day-to- day lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Circumstances of the Immigration Detention of Cornelia Rau
    Inquiry into the Circumstances of the Immigration Detention of Cornelia Rau REPORT July 2005 © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0-646-44945-1 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. Inquiry into the Cornelia Rau Matter Mick Palmer AO APM GPO Box 3007 Ph: (02) 6274 7395 Canberra City ACT 2601 Fax: (02) 6274 7377 www.inquiry.com.au Email: [email protected] 6 July 2005 Senator the Hon. Amanda Vanstone Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Minister I am pleased to present to you my report on the Inquiry into the Circumstances of the Immigration Detention of Cornelia Rau. The Inquiry was conducted in accordance with the terms of reference issued on 9 February 2005 and 2 May 2005. As required by the additional terms of reference of 2 May 2005, my report includes commentary and preliminary findings arising from the Examination of the Vivian Alvarez Matter. Yours sincerely MJ Palmer Principles Protection of individual liberty is at the heart of Australian democracy. When there exist powers that have the capacity to interfere with individual liberty, they should be accompanied by checks and balances sufficient to engender public confidence that those powers are being exercised with integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. a Failure of Public Administration?
    Chapter 1. A failure of public administration? Introduction Debate in the press about the politicisation of the APS has intensified in recent years. Undoubtedly these debates are not new. As will be seen, debate about the `proper' role of the public service has continued virtually unabated since the Whitlam Government introduced ministerial advisers following its election in 1972. Nevertheless, commentators on both sides of politics have reflected on both the number and profile of recent controversies involving perceptions of public service politicisation.1 These include the `Children Overboard' affair (known to the Senate as `A Certain Maritime Incident') involving the Departments of Defence, Immigration and the Prime Minister and Cabinet; the cases of the detention of Cornelia Rau and the deportation of Vivian Solon, involving the then Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (DIMIA);2 the payments made by the Australian Wheat Board (AWB) to the regime of Saddam Hussein in order to obtain contracts for the sale of Australian wheat to Iraq, involving the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT); the detention of Dr Mohamed Haneef, involving the Australian Federal Police; and the role of a senior public servant in the Employment and Workplace Relations portfolio as the face of the Howard Government's WorkChoices media campaign. Debate around most of these cases has tended, particularly in media analysis, to focus on issues of `who knew what and when'. All except the last have resulted in some form of formal inquiry.3 Each involves allegations or suppositions about the degree of direct or indirect complicity between public servants and politicians concerning the communication or management of politically sensitive information.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Titled the Removal, Search for and Discovery of Ms Vivian Solon
    Appendix 3 Additional information, tabled documents, and answers to questions on notice Tabled Documents Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs: • correspondence dated 14 September 2005 – answers to questions on notice from hearing on 6 September 2005 Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade: • correspondence dated 16 September 2005 – answers to questions on notice from hearing on 7 September 2005 The following were tabled (15 September 2005) with the interim report titled The removal, search for and discovery of Ms Vivian Solon: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (documents made public) • email dated 9 September 2003 from DFAT re call from QLD police missing persons unit • background briefing "consular in confidence" undated (2005) by Assistant Secretary, Consular Branch, DFAT • letter dated 5 May 2005 from Consul, Australian Embassy Manila to Chief Record Division, National Center for Mental Health, Mandaluyong City • letter dated 11 May 2005 from Principal Migration Officer, Australian Embassy Manila to Director, Passports Division, DFAT • letter dated 16 May 2005 from Director, Consular Operations, DFAT to First Secretary, Embassy of the Philippines, Canberra • note no. 143/05 dated 17 May 2005 from Australian Embassy Manila to the Philippines Bureau of Immigration • email dated 17 May 2005 from First Assistant Secretary, Public Diplomacy, Consular and Passports Division, DFAT re Philippines media release • case notes on Vivian Alvarez dated 18 May 2005 from Overseas Workers Welfare Administration,
    [Show full text]