DOCSLIB.ORG

Liber Amicorum Antonio La Pergola Liber Amicorum Antonio La Pergola

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Liber Amicorum Antonio La Pergola Liber Amicorum Antonio LA Pergola Juristförlaget i Lund Distribution: eddy.se Liber Amicorum Antonio LA Pergola Juristförlaget i Lund Distribution: eddy.se Editors Pieter van Dijk, Simona Granata-Menghini This new adjusted, extended and re-redited edition of the Liber Amicorum Antonio La Pergola (2008) is published with permission of Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato S.p.A., Rome. Address for orders: eddy.se AB Bokorder Box 1310 S-621 24 Visby +46 498 253900 (tel) +46 498 249789 (fax) Address to the publisher: Juristförlaget i Lund Box 207 S-221 00 Lund +46 46 2221016 (tel) +46 46 2221164 (fax) www.juristforlaget.se Att mångfaldiga innehållet i denna bok, helt eller delvis, utan medgivande av Juristförlaget i Lund, är förbjudet enligt lagen (1960:729) om upphovsrätt till litterära och konstnärliga verk. Förbudet gäller varje form av mångfal- digande, såsom tryckning, kopiering, bandinspelning etc. © Författarna och Juristförlaget i Lund Grafisk form:Alf Dahlberg/PAn eidos Layout: HAns-HeinricH VogeL Photos: sAndro WeLtin/counciL of euroPe Tryck: Wallin &Dalholm Boktryckeri AB Lund 2009 ISBN 978–91–544–0110–9 Foreword to the second edition In October 2008, at the Scuola Grande San Giovanni Evangelista, seat of the Venice Commission, the Liber Amicorum Antonio La Pergola was presented to Ms Annarosa La Pergola and one of her daughters, and to the members Venice Commission. The book, prepared with the kind co-operation of the Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato of which Antonio La Pergola had been the President, was the Commission's wholehearted homage to its visionary founder and President. Mr Hans-Heinrich Vogel, then Swedish member of the Commission and responsible for the publications of the Stiftelsen Juristförlaget i Lund, proposed to prepare another edition of the Liber Amicorum, as a special Swedish tribute to Antonio La Pergola. With gratitude and great satisfaction we welcome this second, enriched version. The Hague, October 2009 Pieter van Dijk, member of the Venice Commission Foreword On the 18th of July 2007, after a long period of serious and bravely endured illness, Mr. Antonio La Pergola passed away. His death caused deep grief, not only in the circle of his family and friends, but also in professional circles in Europe and beyond; it meant a great loss for so many persons in different capacities and in different areas. The Venice Commission lost its Founding Father and “président éternel”, its prestigious standard bearer and effective liaison. The members of the Venice Commission and of the staff lost a wise and experienced mentor and patron, an unfailing source of inspiration, and a caring and fatherly friend in many respects. In several ways Mr. La Pergola was the Venice Commission, and the Venice Commission was his Commission. At its plenary session on the first of October 2007, the Venice Commission held a commemoration service in the presence of Mrs. Annarosa La Pergola, their three daughters Serena, Silvia and Emanuela, representatives of the Council of Europe and several distinguished guests. At the occasion of that solemn and moving gathering it was decided to distribute the commemorative speeches delivered in the Scuola Grande di San Giovanni Evangelista among the much larger group of persons who have known Mr. La Pergola and share dear memories of his person and qualities. In addition the Bureau invited the members of the Venice Commission and its staff, as well as former members and habitual guests of the Commission to contribute to these “Mélanges La Pergola”. It is a cause of great satisfaction and gratitude that so many responded positively and quickly, and that their contributions are of such a quality and diversity that, together, they pay a dignified tribute to the memory of this universal person, emi- nent jurist, brilliant politician, inimitable president and warm-hearted friend. The present publication is made possible thanks to the meticulous editorial assistance of Ms Simona Granata-Menghini, Ms Caroline Martin and Ms Helen Monks of the Secretariat of the Commission, and the very professional and ef- ficient production of theMélanges by Publisher Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato. It is the Venice Commission’s wish that many, while reading and enjoying this publication, will remember Antonio La Pergola and pay tribute to this eminent person and to the high principles he stood for. He will always remain a source of inspiration for “his” Commission. Strasbourg, The Hague, October 2008 Pieter van Dijk, member of the Venice Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS ForeWords 5 tribute to tHe Memory of Antonio LA Pergola SPeecHes 13 Annarosa La Pergola 15 Jan Helgesen 19 Ergun Özbudun 21 Renato Cianfarani 23 Pieter van Dijk 25 THe founding of tHe Venice commission 27 Vingt ans avec Antonio La Pergola pour le développement de la démocratie Par Gianni Buquicchio 29 Speech by Antonio La Pergola at the first Venice conference 35 Speech by Antonio La Pergola at the second Venice conference 39 Premier Venice commission stAtute stAtut Premier de la commission de Venise 45 Mélanges 59 The “Law on Romanians living abroad” : Comments and Assessment in Light of the Venice Commission’s Standards on Kin-state Involvement in Minority Protection By Bogdan Aurescu 61 10 tAbLe of contents The European Union from the Perspective of the Contribution of Antonio La Pergola to the Doctrine of Federalism By Sergio Bartole 73 Democratic Participation in Constitutional Drafting By Ledi Bianku 81 Constitutional Review in The Netherlands By Pieter van Dijk 101 Antonio La Pergola’s Idiosyncratic Contribution to the Unique Success of the Venice Commission By Vojin Dimitrijević 111 De l’élection comme événement à la démocratie comme structure. Réflexions sur la stabilité du droit électoral Par Pierre Garrone 115 Some Thoughts on Constitutional Engineering By Luis López Guerra 129 Le contrôle parlementaire de l’Union Européenne Par Hubert Haenel 145 La dimension collective des droits de l’homme et les conséquences de son occultation par l’individualisation. L’exemple de la réconstruction en Bosnie-Herzégovine Par Gret Haller 151 La question de la nature juridictionnelle de la Cour constitutionnelle Lituanienne Par Egidijus Jarašiunas 171 Is Administrative Justice a Fundamental Right? By Jeffrey Jowell 185 tAbLe of contents 11 The Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Macedonia and their Legal Consequences By Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska 191 Extradition, expulsion et assurances diplomatiques Par Giorgio Malinverni 205 Souvenirs personnels d’un éminent juriste Par Franz Matscher 211 Law’s Contribution to Better Governance in our Future By Ugo Mifsud Bonnici 215 The Constitutional Doctrine of Separation of Powers and the Rule of Law By Myron M. Nicolatos 231 Setting Limits and Setting Limits Aside. The Constitutional Framework of Presidential Power in Post-Communist Countries By Angelika Nußberger 233 Antonio La Pergola et l’Albanie Par Luan Omari 257 Judicial Activism v. Judicial Restraint and Collisions with the Political Elites in Turkey By Ergun Özbudun 261 Consensus and Discretion: Evolution or Erosion of Human Rights Protection? By Péter Paczolay 271 Professor La Pergola’s “Constructive Fantasy” By Cesare Pinelli 281 The Role of the Constitution in the Creation of a Law-Governed State By Hanna Suchocka 287 12 tAbLe of contents Memories of Antonio La Pergola By Cyril Svoboda 297 “Something is Rotten”... Reporting on Corruption By Herdís Thorgeirsdóttir 299 The Many Faces of the Constitution By Kaarlo Tuori 311 Regulation of Political Parties – Guidelines, Codes and Opinions By Hans-Heinrich Vogel 323 Rule of Law and Legal Awareness: Russia in the Contemporary World Challenges and Perspectives By Valery Zorkin 331 curricuLum VitAe And bibLiography 347 tribute to tHe memory of Antonio LA Pergola Venice, 20 October 2007 SPEECHES Annarosa La Pergola Ringrazio vivamente la Commissione di Venezia per aver voluto organizzare questa cerimonia in ricordo del suo Presidente e vorrei cogliere quest’occasione per ringraziare ciascuno di voi per la partecipazione al lutto che ha colpito me e le mie figlie. Ed ora consentitemi di proseguire in italiano, che è la lingua nella quale io e Antonio abbiamo dialogato ininterrottamente per quasi quarant’anni condivi- dendo gli stessi ideali, le stesse battaglie, le stesse speranze. Antonio mi diceva sempre che io e lui siamo stati una sola persona, dall’inizio alla fine della nostra vita insieme: “Sei la mia costola” – mi diceva – “e nessuno me la leva!” – “Adam’s rib” è anche il titolo di una poesiola che mi ha dedicato. Lo ho sempre consi- derato questo come un dono, un privilegio, la magia del matrimonio. Antonio è uscito dalla vita, ma non dalla vita mia e delle mie figlie, e forse nemmeno da quella di molti di voi qui presenti oggi per ricordarlo come giu- rista, uomo e amico fraterno. Antonio ha dedicato tutta la sua vita al lavoro nelle istituzioni, sia nel suo paese che in Europa, allo studio del diritto come fondamento della democrazia. Dalle vostre numerose e bellissime lettere emerge l’unanime riconoscimento del valore del suo instancabile ed appassionato impegno per la costruzione dell’Europa del diritto. Le vostre lettere mi sono state di grande conforto perché esse testimoniano i frutti che la sua cultura, la sua intelligenza e la sua umanità hanno prodotto. Frutti – alcuni hanno detto – destinati a durare nel tempo. Antonio ha dato molto alla Commissione di Venezia – voi dite – ma io aggiun- go che ha ricevuto anche di più. La Commissione di Venezia riassume ed esprime tutti i valori, le idee in cui Antonio ha creduto, direi l’intero progetto della sua vita professionale. Questo suo progetto non avrebbe mai potuto realizzarsi senza tutti voi, i membri della Commissione, senza il Consiglio d’Europa, senza il suo Segretario Generale, senza Gianni Buquicchio ed il suo efficientissimo staff, senza il Ministero degli Affari Esteri e senza la Regione Veneto.
Recommended publications
  • Expert Witness and the Proof of Foreign Law Otto C

    Expert Witness and the Proof of Foreign Law Otto C

    Cornell Law Review Volume 38 Article 1 Issue 2 Winter 1953 Expert Witness and the Proof of Foreign Law Otto C. Sommerich Benjamin Busch Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Otto C. Sommerich and Benjamin Busch, Expert Witness and the Proof of Foreign Law , 38 Cornell L. Rev. 125 (1953) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol38/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CORNELL LAW QUARTERLY VoLtmm 38 WIN mR, 1953 NUMBER 2 THE EXPERT WITNESS AND THE PROOF OF FOREIGN LAW Otto C. Sommerich* and Benjamin Busch* I. INTRODUCTION Few lawyers, scholars or students, are exempt from the fascination that comes from a glimpse into the legal systems of other nations or communities, revealed by the reading of decisions dealing with that subject. It is a truism that the history of a civilization is the history of its laws. A survey of legal decisions based on foreign law does not, however, tell the whole story, for these decisions generally discuss the laws that have already been pleaded and proved, without indicating the rocky and treacherous course that the legal practitioners must have traveled before these laws came within the technical cognizance of the court. Today, more than at any other time in our legal history, it is neces- sary for each practicing lawyer 'to have a full appreciation of the technical aspects of foreign law in litigation.
  • Renvoi in New York and Elsewhere

    Renvoi in New York and Elsewhere

    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 6 Issue 3 Issue 3 - April 1953 Article 12 4-1953 Renvoi in New York and Elsewhere John D. Falconbridge Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Conflict of Laws Commons Recommended Citation John D. Falconbridge, Renvoi in New York and Elsewhere, 6 Vanderbilt Law Review 708 (1953) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol6/iss3/12 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RENVOI IN NEW YORK AND ELSEWHERE JOHN D. PALCONBRIDGE* I. Introduction: Two New York Cases In re Tallmadge1 related to the mode of distribution of the residuary estate of one Chadwick. The report of Winthrop, referee, which was confirmed by the Surrogate's Court of New York County, found that "the 'renvoi' is no part of New York law,"2 whereas thirty-one years later in In re Schneider's Estate it was held by Frankenthaler, Sur- rogate, also in the Surrogate's Court of New York County, that the "broad assertion in Matter of Tallmadge, supra, that the renvoi prin- ciple is not applicable in New York is not in accord with the earlier or later cases. The precise limits of its applicability are as yet un- defined." 3 The mutually irreconcilable, general expressions of opinion by two different judges of the Surrogate's Court of New York County in cases separated widely in point of time and differing widely in their circumstances have at least the merit of directing attention again to the perennially troublesome problem of the renvoi in the conflict of laws.
  • Canabtan Law Zimee

    Canabtan Law Zimee

    Ube Canabtan law zimee. VOL. XXX1II. OCTOBER, 1913. No. 10. THE INDEBTEDNESS OF MODERN JURISPRUD- ENCE TO MEDIEVAL ITALIAN LAW. How much the world owes to Italian genius and labours! For Italy is " the mother of us all." The lamp of civilization has been handed on from ]ome to modern nations by Italian runners. By Italy learning was re-established and the fine arts revived; Italy is truly called " the mother of universities and the saviour of learning." European commerce was ori- ginally revived by Italy, after the flood oT barbarian invasions of Europe had spent itself. By Italians Honan law was re- covered from antiquity, adapted for use iin later times, and forever implanted as a living force in our modern civilization. These grand achievemnents were accomplished by a people labouring under perhaps the worst political handicap known to history. For over thirteen centuries prior to 1.871 Italy never enjoyed any of the blessings of. a political union, and o was either a prey to foreign invaders or torn asunder b*y fratricidal wars. During these imany centuries Italy was but " a geographical expression "-to use Metteruich's illuminating description. Modern united Italy is very youthful Italy is not yet fifty years old.' The exuberancc of Italian patriotism in the recent war with Turkey bears witness to this youthful- ness of modern Italy, which so ardently rejoiced ill its oppor- tunity to display national power. The beginnings of Italian law-using the terni " Italian in its modern sense-start with the emergence of Italy as a separate country out of the fifth century ruins of the ]loman Empire of the West, finally extinguished in 476.
  • Revista De Stiinte Politice Nr.20

    Revista De Stiinte Politice Nr.20

    r. 20 • 2008 ---RRRRRREEEEEEFFFFFFEEEEEERRRRRREEEEEENNNNNNCCCCCCEEEEEESSSSSS--- GHEORGHE VLĂDU łESCUł (Romanian Academy), ALEXANDRU BOBOC (Romanian Academy), FLORIN CONSTANTINIU (Romanian Academy), CRISTIAN PREDA (University of Bucharest), LAURENTIU VLAD (University of Bucharest), VLADIMIR OSIAC (University of Craiova), CĂTĂLIN BORDEIANU („Petre Andrei” University of Iaşi) ---------IIIIIIIIINNNNNNTTTTTTEEEEEERRRRRRNNNNNNAAAAAATTTTTTIIIIIIIIIOOOOOONNNNNNAAAAAALLLLLL AAAAAADDDDDDVVVVVVIIIIIIIIISSSSSSOOOOOORRRRRRYYYYYY BBOOAARRDD--------- MIHAI CIMPO I President o f the Academ y of the Rep ublic of Moldavia ION MACOVEI, Ambasador , Ministerul de Externe al României MICHAEL R ADU, Senior Fellow , Foreign Policy Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA Co-Chairman, FPRI’s Center on Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and Homeland Security, Philadelphia, USA YOHANAN MANOR, Professor, University de Jerusalem, Israel President, Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace (CMIP) JOZE PIRJEVE C, Professor, University of Trieste, Italy PATRIC IA GONZALEZ-A LDEA Professor, University Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain OLIVER F RIGGIE RI, Professor , University of Malta CRISTINA BE JAN, Wadham College, Oxford, Great Britain MARINA PU JA BADESKU , Professor , University of Novi Sad SLAVCO ALMĂ JAN, Professor , University of Novi Sad, Serbia President , „Argos” Center for Open Dialogue, Novi Sad, Serbia NICU C IOBANU President, „Libertatea”Publishing House, Novi Sad, Serbia ---------EEEEEEDDDDDDIIIIIIIIITTTTTTOOOOOORRRRRRIIIIIIIIIAAAAAALLLLLL BBBBBBOOOOOOAAAAAARRRRRRDDDDDD---------
  • The Right to Trial Within a Reasonable Time and Short-Term Reform of the European Court of Human Rights

    The Right to Trial Within a Reasonable Time and Short-Term Reform of the European Court of Human Rights

    APPLYING AND SUPERVISING THE ECHR The right to trial within a reasonable time and short-term reform of the European Court of Human Rights 100 95 Round table organised by the Slovenian chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe 75 Bled, Slovenia, 21-22 September 2009 25 5 COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L’EUROPE 0 The right to trial within a reasonable time and short-term reform of the European Court of Human Rights Round Table organised by the Slovenian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe Bled, Slovenia, 21-22 September 2009 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Council of Europe Ministry of Justice Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of Slovenia Édition française : Le droit d’un procès dans un délai raisonnable et la réforme à court terme de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. Table ronde organisée par la présidence slovène du Comité des Ministres du Conseil de l’Europe, Bled, Slovénie, 21-22 septembre 2009 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the repective contributors and do not engage the responsibility of the Council of Europe or the Government of the Republic of Slovenia. They should not be regarded as placing upon the legal instruments mentioned in it any official interpretation capable of binding the governments of member states, the Council of Europe’s statutory organs or any organ set up by virtue of the European Convention on Human Rights. CIP – Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 347.9(4)(082) 342.7:347.99(4)(082) The RIGHT to trial within a reasonable time and short-term reform of the European Court of Human Rights: Round Table organised by the Slovenian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, Bled, Slovenia, 21-22 September 2009.
  • The Dimensions of Public Policy in Private International Law

    The Dimensions of Public Policy in Private International Law

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery The Dimensions of Public Policy in Private International Law Alex Mills* Accepted version: Published in (2008) 4 Journal of Private International Law 201 1 The problem of public policy in private international law National courts always retain the power to refuse to apply a foreign law or recognise or enforce a foreign judgment on the grounds of inconsistency with public policy. The law which would ordinarily be applicable under choice of law rules may, for example, be denied application where it is “manifestly incompatible with the public policy (‘ordre public’) of the forum”1, and a foreign judgment may be refused recognition on the grounds that, for example, “such recognition is manifestly contrary to public policy in the [state] in which recognition is sought”2. The existence of such a discretion is recognised in common law rules, embodied in statutory codifications of private international law3, including those operating between European states otherwise bound by principles of mutual trust, and is a standard feature of international conventions on private international law4. It has even been suggested that it is a general principle of law which can thus be implied in private international law treaties which are silent on the issue5. The public policy exception is not only ubiquitous6, but also a fundamentally important element of modern private international law. As a ‘safety net’ to choice of law rules and rules governing the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, it is a doctrine which crucially defines the outer limits of the ‘tolerance of difference’ implicit in those rules7.
  • 1 1. President Traian Basescu Asks for Gov't Strategy for Black Sea Gas

    1 1. President Traian Basescu Asks for Gov't Strategy for Black Sea Gas

    Embassy of Romania in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ____________________________________________________________________________________________ No. 14/ 7th Year POLITICS 1. President Traian Basescu asks for Gov't strategy for Black Sea gas transit to be made via Transgaz 2. BEC - final results: Iohannis 54.43 pct, Ponta 45.56 pct 3. Constitutional Court validates presidential elections: Klaus Iohannis is Romania's President 4. Klaus Iohannis - President-elect (bio) 5. IRES poll: Over 80pct of Romanians expecting Iohannis to make good on his electoral promises 6. Romanian President-elect Iohannis meets Chisinau mayor Chirtoaca 7. Bogdan Aurescu is the new Foreign Affairs Minister and Hegedus Csilla, the new Culture Minister and Deputy Prime Minister 8. Foreign Minister Aurescu, U.S. chargé d'affaires Thompson discuss Strategic Partnership guidelines for 2015 9. Present government coalition benefits from support of 67% of MPs 10. Draft law on amnesty and pardons rejected by Chamber of Deputies 11. The international conference "25 years after the fall of communist dictatorships in Eastern Europe: looking back, looking forward"starts in Bucharest 12. Gorbachev's message to conference "25 Years since the Collapse of Communist Dictatorships in Eastern Europe: Looking Back, Looking Forward" 13. Mast Stepping Ceremony - dedicated to the anti-missile facility Aegis Ashore at the military base at Deveselu 14. MAE does not recognize the so-called Treaty on Allied Relations and Strategic Partnership between the Russian Federation and Abkhazia ECONOMICS 1. Romania ranks 52 of 189 countries in Paying Taxes 2015 top 2. The cut VAT on meat and meat products, conducting 3.5 billion euros in annual businesses 3.
  • Facultatea De Mecanica Craiova

    Facultatea De Mecanica Craiova

    UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA SCHOOL OF LAW AND SOCIAL WORK SOCIO-HUMANITIES DOCTORAL SCHOOL FIELD: SOCIOLOGY COMMUNICATION IN DIPLOMACY SUMMARY Scientific coordinator: PhD student: Prof. Adrian GORUN, PhD Theodora Magdalena MIRCEA 2016 CONTENTS: I. INTRODUCTION: THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNICATION IN THE DIPLOMATIC MILIEU.............................. p. 6 1 The importance of the topic, implications and meanings from sociological perspective........................................................................................................... p. 6 2. Specific considerations and particular implications of this topic for Romania’s diplomacy............................................................................................................. p. 7 3. The main objectives of the paper, research stages, working hypotheses, methodology remarks........................................................................................... p. 7 4. References, consonances and limits in debating the topic................................... p. 10 5. Possible landmarks for improving the diplomatic communication of Romania............................................................................................................... p. 12 6. Conclusions.......................................................................................................... p. 15 II. THE TYPICAL FEATURES OF COMMUNICATION IN DIPLOMACY.................................................................................................... p. 17 1. Communication - from theory
  • REALITATEA EVREIASCĂ - Nr

    REALITATEA EVREIASCĂ - Nr

    Anul Nou al Pomilor TU BIŞVAT PUBLICAŢIE A FEDERAŢIEI COMUNITĂŢILOR EVREIEŞTI DIN ROMÂNIA 4 februarie 2015 – ANUL LVI = NR. 442-443 (1242-1243) = 1 – 31 IANUARIE 2015 =10 TEVET – 11 ŞVAT 5775 =24 PAGINI – 3 LEI 15 Şvat 5775 PAG. 6 HOLOCAUsTUL descris de generalul american Dwight D. EIsenhower Generalul D. Eisenhower a avut o premoniţie vizitând lagărul de con- centrare de la Gotha. Într-o scrisoare adresată generalului George C. Marshall, el scria în aprilie 194 5: „Dovezile vizuale şi verbale de înfometare, cruzime şi bestialitate erau copleşitoare. Într-o cameră erau aruncate, într-o grămadă, cadavrele unor oameni goi, ucişi prin înfometare. Am vizitat locul (unde generalul Patton a refuzat să intre- n.red.) pentru a putea ulterior să depun mărturie directă dacă vreodată, în viitor, va apărea tendinţa de a pune aceste acuzaţii pe seama propagandei”. Cupola de la Yad Vashem 27 ianuarie ZIUA INTERNAŢIONALĂ A HOLOCAUsTULUI - 70 de ani de la eliberarea lagărului nazist de la Aus chwitz de către Forţele Aliate Lagărul de la Auschwitz Eliberarea lagărului de la Auschwitz ATENTATUL TERORIsT DIN FRANŢA Contribuţia evreimii PAG. 7 74 de ani „Au murit numai fiindcă erau evrei” române la Aşezământul de la Această propoziţie, sub forma: „singu- caşer din Paris, şi nu întâmplător, potrivit Muncii în Ereţ Israel Pogromul ra lor vină a fost că erau evrei”, o folosim propriilor declaraţii făcute prin telefonul PAG. 9 adesea când ne referim la victimele Ho- mobil unui post de radio. El a năvălit în din locaustului. O regăsim în paginile cărţilor magazin, a omorât patru ostatici şi, până HANUCA Bucureştii de istorie, în paginile unor ziare, în evocări la urmă, a fost împuşcat, ca de altfel şi cei Bucureşti ale supravieţuitorilor.
  • Annual Report 2008 MMUNITIES CO EUROPEAN the of JUSTICE of T UR CO 250 Inksave Uncoated; ISO CMYK Profile: Output 11:00:08; 2009 16, Apr Date: Mm); 297.00

    Annual Report 2008 MMUNITIES CO EUROPEAN the of JUSTICE of T UR CO 250 Inksave Uncoated; ISO CMYK Profile: Output 11:00:08; 2009 16, Apr Date: Mm); 297.00

    C EN 001 09 AG QD EN COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ANNUAL REPORT 2008 OF CO UR THE T OF EUROPEAN JUSTICE CO MMUNITIES Annual 2008 re por t ISSN 1680-8304 Format: (430.40 x 297.00 mm); Date: Apr 16, 2009 11:00:08; Output Profile: CMYK ISO Uncoated; InkSave 250 How to obtain EU publications Publications for sale: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • from your bookseller by quoting the title, publisher and/or ISBN number; • by contacting one of our sales agents directly. You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://bookshop.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. Free publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Commission’s representations or delegations. You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. 250 InkSave Uncoated; ISO CMYK Profile: Output 11:00:08; 2009 16, Apr Date: mm); 297.00 x (430.40 Format: COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ANNUAL REPORT 2008 Synopsis of the work of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities and the European Union Civil Service Tribunal Luxembourg 2009 www.curia.europa.eu Failed Preflight: 280; InkSave (ECI); v2 Coated ISO CMYK Profile: Output 07:54:49; 2009 15, May Date: mm); 297.00 x (210.00 Format: Court of Justice of the European Communities 2925 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel. +352 4303-1 Court of First Instance of the European Communities 2925 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tel.
  • CJEU Annual Report 2014

    CJEU Annual Report 2014

    QD-AG-15-001-EN-C ISSN 1831-8444 ANNUAL 2014 REPORT ANNUAL COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Annual report 2014 COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN THE OF JUSTICE OF COURT EN HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS Free publications: • one copy: via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • more than one copy or posters/maps: from the European Union’s representations (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_en.htm); from the delegations in non-EU countries (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_en.htm); by contacting the Europe Direct service (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm) or calling 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (freephone number from anywhere in the EU) (*). (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). Priced publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). doi:10.2862/35936 COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Synopsis of the work of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal Luxembourg, 2015 www.curia.europa.eu Court of Justice 2925 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tél. +352 4303-1 General Court 2925 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tél. +352 4303-1 Civil Service Tribunal 2925 Luxembourg LUXEMBOURG Tél. +352 4303-1 The Court of Justice on the Internet: http://www.curia.europa.eu Completed on: 1 January 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The photographs may be reproduced only in the context of this publication. For any other use, authorisation must be sought from the Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Renvoi Theory and the Application of Foreign Law: Renvoi in Particular

    Renvoi Theory and the Application of Foreign Law: Renvoi in Particular

    THE RENVOI THEORY AND THE APPLICA­ TION OF FOREIGN LAW. • II. Renvoi IN PARTICULAR Cr,ASSES OF CASES. It has been intimated that renvoi might be allowed as an ex­ ceptional doctrine with respect to the lex domicilii. The theory suggested is that since the adoption of the le.~ domicilii in the Con­ flict of Laws arose from a desire that the rights governed thereby be subject to one law1-an aim impossible of realization after many countries have gone over to the lex patria?-_courts still adhering to the old rule would be justified in interpreting the same in a renvoi sense.2 This conclusion, however, is inadmissible. Could the question be examined de novo, English and American courts, for example, might hold, in view of their tendency to subject transfers of personal property inter vivos to the lex rei sit(E, 3 that the same rule should govern its distribution upon death. But as long as the lex domicilii is retained as the general principle4 a substitution of the lex fori for the foreign law upon the sole ground that the foreign country had become a con­ vert to the lex patri(E could be supported neither upon principle nor upon grounds of policy.5 The objections raised against renvoi in general apply with full force to this class of cases. 6 'There is considerable doubt in regard to the origin of the rule lex domicilii in the matter of succession. See Harvey v. Richards ( 1818) r Mason 381, per Story, J.; Thorne v. Watkins (1750) 2 Ves.