Plan Change 15 RURAL NOISE PROVISIONS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plan Change 15 RURAL NOISE PROVISIONS SECTIONAL DISTRICT PLAN REVIEW Plan Change 15 RURAL NOISE PROVISIONS for PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL File No. N2360 Version Final V1 9 September 2014 ACOUSAFE CONSULTING & ENGINEERING LTD Nigel Lloyd Director of Acoustic Services E-mail: [email protected] P.O. BOX 14-315 WELLINGTON 6241, NEW ZEALAND. TELEPHONE 64-4-388 3407 ACOUSAFE CONSULTING & ENGINEERING LTD 412 1830 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 2 Outline of Tasks ........................................................................................ 1 2.1 General District Plan Provisions ......................................................... 1 2.2 Wind Farm Noise Brief ........................................................................ 2 2.3 Reverse Sensitivity Noise ................................................................... 2 3 General District Plan Noise Provisions ...................................................... 3 3.1 Operative District Plan – Noise Rules ................................................. 3 3.2 Section 6 Exclusions ........................................................................... 4 3.3 Updating Noise Rule R 9.12.1 ............................................................ 5 3.4 Recommended Noise Rules for the Rural Zone ................................. 5 3.5 Other Zone Interfaces ......................................................................... 6 4 Wind Farm Noise ....................................................................................... 7 4.1 Supporting Documents ....................................................................... 7 4.2 National Policy Statement and Implementation Guide ........................ 7 4.3 Turitea Wind Farm Decision ............................................................... 7 4.4 Te Rere Hau Wind Farm Declaration .................................................. 8 4.5 GEM Technical Workshop Report 2008.............................................. 9 4.6 Operative District Plan Provisions - Activity Status for Wind Farms .... 9 4.7 Section 6 Exclusions for Wind Farm Noise ....................................... 10 4.8 Definition of Wind Farm .................................................................... 10 4.9 NZS6808:2008 .................................................................................. 11 4.10 NZS6808 High Amenity Areas ....................................................... 12 4.11 Porirua City Council Plan Change ................................................. 12 4.12 Proposed Wind Farm Rules........................................................... 13 4.13 Wind Farm Discretionary Activity - Assessment Criteria ................ 15 4.14 Wind Farm Noise - Reverse Sensitivity ......................................... 15 5 Quarry Noise ........................................................................................... 20 5.1 Supporting Documents ..................................................................... 20 5.2 Existing District Plan Activity Status .................................................. 21 5.3 Existing District Plan Noise Rules ..................................................... 22 5.4 Existing Quarries .............................................................................. 22 6 State Highway Noise ............................................................................... 24 7 Rail Noise ................................................................................................ 26 8 General Reverse Sensitivity Considerations ........................................... 27 9 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 28 P.O. BOX 14-315 WELLINGTON 6241, NEW ZEALAND. TELEPHONE 64-4-388 3407 ACOUSAFE CONSULTING & ENGINEERING LTD 413 1831 District Plan Change 15 Rural Zone Noise Provisions Status – Final V1 1 Introduction This is a Sectional District Plan Change Review of the Palmerston North City Rural Zone, including: General noise controls, Wind farms Quarries, State Highway noise Rail noise, and Controls on reverse sensitivity issues such as nearby noise sensitive development and subdivision, These are all significant issues that need to be addressed in the Rural Zone. In 2012 PNCC undertook a successful boundary change process with Manawatu District Council. The newly incorporated land is predominantly rural and is likely to be zoned Rural under the Palmerston North City District Plan. Some of this land is proposed to be rezoned Industrial to provide for the future extension of the North East Industrial Zone. This review considers domestic and commercial scale wind generation activities. Domestic machines are significantly smaller than those found in commercial wind farms and would be utilised in small numbers. Domestic wind turbines would normally be required to meet the District Plan noise limits. Commercial machines may be 100 metres tall or more and generate significantly higher noise levels. To date wind farms in the Manawatu and Tararua areas have been developed as large-scale projects with varying degrees of acceptance from rural neighbours. There have been high levels of objection to wind farm noise at certain locations, as evidenced by the number of submissions received opposing wind farm proposals, in the past decade. Noise issues relating to quarries, State Highways and rail corridors are considered in this review with a particular emphasis on the protection against reverse sensitivity. Reference to the District Plan in this review means the Palmerston North City District Plan, unless it states otherwise. 2 Outline of Tasks The brief for this Noise Report is as follows: 2.1 General District Plan Provisions a) Incorporate any changes to NZ standards that impact on the Rural Zone noise provisions: (i) changes to existing NZ Standards that are currently referenced in the Operative District Plan, (ii) incorporation of relevant new NZ Standards by reference, and P.O. BOX 14-315 WELLINGTON 6241, NEW ZEALAND. TELEPHONE 64-4-388 3407 ACOUSAFE CONSULTING & ENGINEERING LTD 414 1832 District Plan Review Industrial Zone 2 Noise Provisions Status – Final V1 (iii) update of the Rural Zone Noise provisions as a consequence of changes in NZ Standards, such as NZS 6801 and 6802. b) Identify any other activities in the Rural Zone that may require specific noise provisions and recommend provisions accordingly while being aware of the Boundary Change Area, and c) Draft new District Plan noise provisions to fit with the structure and approach of the operative District Plan, as far as practicable. Give consideration to and provide advice on any transitional issues. 2.2 Wind Farm Noise Brief Regarding wind farm noise, an assessment will be made of the existing District Plan policies and objectives and rules to identify where these need to be changed and what additional measures are required. The aim is to prepare a noise section for the draft plan change. The technical advice sought by Council is as follows: a) Review the current Manawatu District and Palmerston North City Rural Zone noise provisions, in particular Rule 9.12.1 of the Palmerston North City District Plan. b) Specific recommendations for domestic and national scale wind' farms taking into account the relevant NZ Standards. Note: We will need to discuss the broad approach to managing wind farms in the District Plan but still support the conclusions of 2008 technical workshop - GEM report. c) Specific recommendations to manage reverse sensitivity noise effects on existing I consented wind farms. d) Consider whether there are any 'high amenity areas' as envisaged by NZS 6808:2010 (cl 5.3) which ought to be considered for identification within the District Plan. 2.3 Reverse Sensitivity Noise A section of the original brief referred to Quarry noise and “other existing activities” with reverse sensitivity noise effects. In a recent Sectional Plan Change hearing for the Whakarongo Urban Growth Area (“PC6”), submissions were received from New Zealand Transport Agency (“NZTA”) and KiwiRail who sought protection from reverse sensitivity impacts from new dwellings close to the State Highway system and to the railway line respectively. Each of quarries, the State Highway roading system and the rail system are important infrastructural elements that need to be protected from inappropriate development by noise sensitive activities that would result in possible future restrictions occurring. Inappropriate development can unwittingly expose people to noise that exceeds levels that are considered suitable to protect residential health and amenity. P.O. BOX 14-315 WELLINGTON 3, NEW ZEALAND. TELEPHONE 64-4-388 3407. FAX 64-4-388 3507 ACOUSAFE CONSULTING & ENGINEERING LTD 415 1833 District Plan Review Industrial Zone 3 Noise Provisions Status – Final V1 3 General District Plan Noise Provisions 3.1 Operative District Plan – Noise Rules Section 6: General. Rule 6.2.6.2(e) of the District Plan specifically excludes wind farms from the District Plan’s Noise Control Rules and states: (e) Sounds generated by wind farm activities in the Rural Zone shall be assessed, predicted, measured and controlled by reference to New Zealand Standard NZS6808:1998 Acoustics – The Assessment and Measurement of Sound From Wind Turbine Generators. The Noise Rule for the Rural Zone is found in Rule R9.12.1: (a) Sound emissions from any activity in the Rural Zone when measured at or within the boundary of any
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand, Tokyo, Japan
    APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand Workshop on Grid Interconnection Issues for Renewable Energy 12 October, 2010 Tokyo, Japan RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Coverage Electricity Generation in New Zealand, The Electricity Market, Grid Connection Issues, Technical Solutions, Market Solutions, Problems Encountered Key Points. RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity in New Zealand 7 Major Generators, 1 Transmission Grid owner – the System Operator, 29 Distributors, 610 km HVDC link between North and South Islands, Installed Capacity 8,911 MW, System Generation Peak about 7,000 MW, Electricity Generated 42,000 GWh, Electricity Consumed, 2009, 38,875 GWh, Losses, 2009, 346 GWh, 8.9% Annual Demand growth of 2.4% since 1974 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Installed Electricity Capacity, 2009 (MW) Renew able Hydro 5,378 60.4% Generation Geothermal 627 7.0% Wind 496 5.6% Wood 18 0.2% Biogas 9 0.1% Total 6,528 73.3% Non-Renew able Gas 1,228 13.8% Generation Coal 1,000 11.2% Diesel 155 1.7% Total 2,383 26.7% Total Generation 8,91 1 100.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity Generation, 2009 (GWh) Renew able Hydro 23,962 57.0% Generation Geothermal 4,542 10.8% Wind 1,456 3.5% Wood 323 0.8% Biogas 195 0.5% Total 30,478 72.6% Non-Renew able Gas 8,385 20.0% Generation Coal 3,079 7.3% Oil 8 0.0% Waste Heat 58 0.1% Total 11,530 27.4% Total Generation 42,008 1 00.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity from Renewable Energy New Zealand has a high usage of Renewable Energy • Penetration 67% , • Market Share 64% Renewable Energy Penetration Profile is Changing, • Hydroelectricity 57% (decreasing but seasonal), • Geothermal 11% (increasing), • 3.5% Wind Power (increasing).
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Geomechanics News June 2005 NEW ZEALAND GEOMECHANICS NEWS
    Newsletter of the New Zealand Issue 69 Geotechnical Society Inc. 1SSN 0111–6851 NZ Geomechanics News June 2005 NEW ZEALAND GEOMECHANICS NEWS JUNE 2005, ISSUE 69 CONTENTS Chairman’s Corner . 2 Editorial Good Reasons to be Good - P Glassey . 3 Letters to the Editor . 4 Editorial Policy. 4 Report from the Secretary . 6 International Society Reports ISSMGE . 7 IAEG . 8 ISRM . 10 ISRM - Rocha Medal . 11 ISRM - National Group website . 12 NZGS Branch Activities . 13 Conference Adverts . 20 Reviews Degrees of Belief. 23 Mapping in Engineering Geology . 24 Geotechnical Engineering Education . 25 Project News Banda Aceh - 8 Weeks After Disaster Struck . 26 Strengthening Ngaio Gorge Road Walls . 34 Te Apiti Wind Farm: Megawatt-class Machines aided by Geotechnical Expertise. 37 Geotechnical Investigations and Testing for Wellington Inner City Bypass . 40 Standards, Law and Industry News Why doesn’t New Zealand have a Geotechnical Database? . 42 Breaking News 18 May rainstorm Damage, Bay of Plenty . 43 Technical Articles Numerical Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering Final Part . 44 The Bob Wallace Column . 49 Company Profiles Keith Gillepsie Associates . 50 Boart Longyear Drillwell . 52 Member Profiles Merrick Taylor . 54 Ann Williams . 55 Events Diary . 57 New Zealand Geotechnical Society Inc Information . 60 New Zealand Geotechnical Society Inc Publications 2005 . 63 Advertising Information . 64 Cover photo: Landslide debris, Tauranga as a result of the 18 May 2005 rainstorm Photo Credit: Mauri McSaveney, GNS New Zealand Geomechanics News CHAIRMAN’S
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy ERU 03-06 PDD Stage 2 Final
    Te Apiti Wind Farm Project (Previously the Lower North Island Wind Project) Project Design Document ERUPT 3 Project: Te Apiti Wind Farm Project (Previously Lower North Island Wind Project) Reference: ERU 03/06 Document: Baseline Study Version: 2 Programme: ERUPT 3 Stage 2 Date: August 2003 1 PROJECT DETAILS 1.1 Project characteristics Supplier Company name Meridian Energy Limited Address 15 Allen Street Zip Code & City Address Wellington Postal Address PO Box 10-840 Zip Code & City Postal Address Wellington Country New Zealand Contact Person Ms Tracy Dyson Job Title Sustainable Energy and Climate Change Advisor Tele phone Number +64 4 381 1271 Fax Number +64 4 381 1201 E-mail [email protected] Bank/Giro Number Upon Request Bank WestpacTrust No. of Employees 202 Company’s Main Activity Electricity Generation, Retailing, Trading CPV Number WN/938552 Registration Number Professional or Trade Not Applicable Register Date of Registration 17th March 1999 Local contacts and other parties involved The local contact will be Meridian Energy Ltd who will be the project owner, project manager and project developer. Te Apiti Wind Farm Project Design Document 2003 Page 2 of 67 Confidential 20th August 2003 1.2 Project Abstract Project Title Te Apiti Wind Farm Host country New Zealand Abstract Meridian Energy, New Zealand’s largest generator of electricity from renewable resources and a state owned enterprise would like to develop a wind generation project in the lower North Island of New Zealand. This project is called the Te Apiti Wind Farm and will have a capacity of between 82.5-96.25 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Hill Wind Farm: Electricity-Related Effects Report
    Castle Hill Wind Farm: Electricity-Related Effects Report Prepared for Genesis Energy July 2011 Concept Consulting Group Limited Level 6, Featherston House 119-121 Featherston St PO Box 10-045, Wellington, NZ www.concept.co.nz Contents 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................6 1.1 Purpose..................................................................................................................................6 1.2 Information sources ..............................................................................................................6 1.3 Concept Consulting Group.....................................................................................................6 2 The Castle Hill Wind Farm Project....................................................................................7 2.1 Project Outline.......................................................................................................................7 2.2 Key Electrical Parameters for CHWF......................................................................................7 3 Electricity in the New Zealand Economy..........................................................................8 3.1 Electricity and Consumer Energy...........................................................................................8 3.2 Electricity consumption and supply in New Zealand.............................................................9 3.3 Historical Electricity Demand
    [Show full text]
  • Did Impact Assessment Influence the Decision Makers? IAIA'12
    Did Impact Assessment influence the decision makers? The Turitea wind farm proposal in New Zealand IAIA’12 – Porto,,g Portugal Theme Forum: Even renewables may not be acceptable: Negotiating community responses to wind energy through impact assessment The setting Wind farms near the city of Palmerston North: existing (3), permitted (1) and proposed (1) Te Apiti wind farm as seen from near the village of Ashhurst Tararua wind farm as seen from the village of Ashhurst Tararua wind farm – stage 1 – lattice towers. Sheep farming continues. Tararua wind farm (3-bladed, 2MW) and Te Rere Hau wind farm (2-bladed, 500kW) City of Palmerston North from Te Rere Hau wind farm Te Rere Hau wind farm from Palmerston North City Which communities? 1st wind farm: built by Palmerston North lines company to supply Palmerston North Now: all wind farms supply the national (grid) community Rural-residential communities closest to the windfarms? The next proposal – wider community context The next proposal – localised community context The next proposal – localised community context SIA activities: Multiple-method approach Surveys (226 & 212 respondents) •Random survey of city residents (Citizen Panel) •Spatially targeted survey of people living within 5km of an existing turbine (ex-post survey) Focus groups (41 participants) •1 for landowners with turbines; •4 for near neighbours without turbines Interviews (34) •Recreation groups, tourism sector, wind farm companies, construction/servicing companies, regional economic development interests, iwi Declining levels
    [Show full text]
  • Download Meeting Summary
    Turitea wind farm Community Liaison Group 10 February 2021 MARGARET KOUVELIS welcomed everyone to the meeting, noting it was being held at a new time (5pm) and the intention to hold meeting to one hour. She noted that everyone should have signed in using the Golf Club’s QR poster downstairs, and handed over to Dennis Radich. Present from Mercury: Dennis Radich (Project Director), John Campbell (Project Manager), Duncan Annandale (Property Manager), Mark Henry (Environmental Resources Manager), Katy Scoullar (Communications Manager). From Vestas: Kenn Wood (Project Manager) HOW CAN WE IMPROVE THESE MEETINGS? We’ve been looking at what these meetings are for, and whether we achieve that • Length of meetings • What we use the time to talk about • Room hire and catering 2 MEETING FORMAT RE-SET DENNIS said that it is now a logical time to review this meeting format as in May it will be 2 years since our first meeting, and major construction work on the transmission line is largely complete. We wanted to know how we could improve the way we hold these meetings to make them more useful and valuable. Attendance from people in the community has dwindled. Take away the project and contrator teams and there’s actually a very small number who attend. We used our email mailing list to seek feedback on the meeting format, along with the other ways we share information with the community. Our conclusions are that these meetings are too long, we hire a room too big for what we need and because the meetings are so long we need sustenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Puketoi Wind Farm
    1 PUKETOI WIND FARM RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS AND ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 2 August 2011 2 VOLUME 1 PART A: RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATIONS 3 APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE CONSENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 88 OF THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 FORM 9 To: Manawatu-Wanganui (Horizons) Regional Council Regional House 11-15 Victoria Street Private Bag 11 025 Manawatu Mail Centre PALMERSTON NORTH MIGHTY RIVER POWER LIMITED (‘Mighty River Power’) hereby applies for the following resource consents pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 (‘RMA’): Resource Consents Sought 1. Mighty River Power proposes to construct, operate and maintain a Wind Farm containing up to 53 wind turbines and an associated transmission line (‘the Proposal’) as more fully discussed and described within the Assessment of Environmental Effects (‘AEE’), which follows as Part B of this document. 2. Mighty River Power applies for all necessary resource consents to construct, operate and maintain the Proposal as detailed in the AEE, including but not limited to: Land and Water Regional Plan a. Land Use Consents – for earthworks and vegetation removal associated with the construction of the Proposal, including access roads, turbine and transmission tower foundations and for ancillary buildings; b. Discharge Permits – for the discharge of stormwater to land, including stormwater from the substation, switchyard, concrete batching plants, workshop, staff ablutions building and fuel storage areas. Manawatu Catchment Water Quality Plan c. Discharge Permit – for discharge of stormwater from the substation, switchyards, concrete batching plants, workshop, staff ablutions building and fuel storage areas; Regional Plan for the Beds of Rivers and Lakes and Associated Activities d.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision No. 2013 Nzenvc 59 of Resource Consent. Applications
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. 2013 NZEnvC 59 of resource consent. applications IN THE MATTER directly referred to the Court under Section 8.7C(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED BY (ENV -2011-CHC-000090) Applicant Hearing dates: 27, 28 August, 2012; 3-7, 10- 14, 24-28 September, 2012; 1-5, 15-17, 23 October, 2012. Site visits: 29 August, 19 September (Te Uku), 14 & 24 October, 2012 Court: Judge M Harland Commissioner MP Oliver Deputy Commissioner B Gollop Date: 15 Apri12013 INTERIM DECISION A. The applications for resource consent are granted subject to amended conditions. B. We record for the ·avoidance of doubt, that this decision is final in respect of the confirmation of the grant of the resource consents (on amended conditions) but is interim in respect of the precise wording of the conditions, and in particular the details relating to the Community Fund condition(s). C. We direct the Hurunui District Council and the Canterbury Regional Council to submit to the Court amended conditions of consent giving effect to this decision by 17 May 2013. In preparing the amended conditions the Councils are to consult with the other parties, particularly in relation to the condition(s) relating to the Community Fund. D. If any party wishes to make submissions in relation to the Community Fund conditions, these are to be filed by 17 May 2013. E. Costs are reserved. Hurunui District Council Respondent Canterbury Regional Council Respondent Appearances: Mr A Beatson, Ms N Garvan and Ms E Taffs for Meridian
    [Show full text]
  • Section 87F Report to Waka Kotahi Nz Transport Agency
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency to Manawatu Whanganui Regional Council for resource consents associated with the construction and operation of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway. SECTION 87F REPORT TO WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL 25 May 2020 Section 87F Report APP-2017201552.00 - Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway 1 Prepared by Mark St.Clair – Planning A. OUTLINE OF REPORT 1 This report, required by section 87F of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RMA”), addresses the issues set out in sections 104 to 112 of the RMA, to the extent that they are relevant to the applications lodged with the Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council (“Horizons”) The consents applied for, by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (the “Transport Agency”) are required to authorise the construction, operation and maintenance of the Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway (the “Project”). 2 In addition, the Transport Agency separately applied for a Notice of Requirement (“NoR”) to Palmerston North City Council (“PNCC”), Tararua District Council (“TDC”) and Manawatu District Council (“MDC”). The Environment Court confirmed the designation for the Project, including a more northern alignment (discussed later in this section 87F report), subject to conditions, on 23 March 2020. While this section 87F report only addresses the applications lodged with MWRC, the designation and the associated conditions have also been considered as part of the assessment. 3 This report has been prepared in accordance with section 87F of the RMA which sets out the matters the report must cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation of Wind Turbines & Future of New Zealand's Wind Energy
    Next generation of wind turbines & the future of New Zealand wind energy Peter Cowling Head of Vestas Australia and New Zealand New large-scale generation since 2014 3 Table of contents Wind turbine technology update 4-15 Future of New Zealand’ wind energy 16-20 2 Next generation of wind turbines and future of NZ wind energy Classification: Public Turitea: new large scale generation since 2014 Vestas to strengthen Mercury’s renewable portfolio by delivering its first wind asset, Turitea Wind Farm. The Wind Farm is the country’s first large-scale generation capacity addition since 2014, after 15 years in the development pipeline. Customer: Mercury Location: Turitea, near Palmerston North Wind turbine: 33 X V112-3.6 MW Hub height: 69 meters Total installed capacity: 119MW Service contract: 25-year AOM 5000 3 Next generation of wind turbines and future of NZ wind energy Classification: Public Wind turbine technology update Versatile solutions for any wind energy project Ongoing innovation from the undisputed global wind leader 2 MW Platform 4 MW Platform EnVentus™ Platform PRODUCT- V90-2.0 V100- V110- V116 V120 V105- V112- V117- V117- V126- V136- V136- V150- V150- V162- 4.2 MW™ CAPACITY MW® 2.0 MW® 2.0 MW® 2.1 MW™ 2.2 MW™ 3.45 MW™ 3.45 MW ® ** 3.45 MW ® 4.2 MW™ 3.45 MW ® 3.45 MW ® 4.2 MW™ 5.6 MW™ 5.6 MW™ YEAR OF PROTOTYPE 2004 2009 2014 2017 2018 2014 2013 2013 2018 2013 2016 2018 2018 2019 2020 Installed* Installed** 43 GW 23 GW * As of 31 December 2018, including V80-1.8/2.0 MW™ and V90-1.8 MW™ ** As of 31 December 2018, Including V112-3.0
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy to Partner with AGL in Developing Southern
    Meridian Energy to partner with AGL in developing Southern Hemisphere’s largest wind farm For immediate release: New Zealand's largest renewable electricity generator, Meridian, and Australia's largest renewable electricity generator AGL today announced the establishment of a joint venture to build what will be the southern hemisphere's biggest wind farm. The project is the 420 MW Macarthur wind farm in southwest Victoria. The final build cost will be around A$1 billion and is due for completion in 2013. Meridian’s 50 percent investment share in the project will be made through a combination of equity and project finance which will be sourced by the joint venture partners. Meridian chief executive Tim Lusk said today the investment was consistent with Meridian’s Australian wind investment strategy, which earlier this year saw the company acquire the 70 MW Mt Millar wind farm in South Australia. “The Macarthur project is a great opportunity to facilitate our growth ambitions in Australia. The project offers long term, reliable generation revenues which will complement the rest of Meridian’s developing Australian wind portfolio. The electricity purchase contracts have been structured in a way that the joint venture does not take market price or electricity production volume risk.” Mr Lusk said Macarthur cements a long term relationship between Meridian and AGL. “This joint venture between the largest renewable developers in New Zealand and Australia, each bringing complementary skill sets to the project, gives us great confidence that it will be delivered successfully. The good cultural fit evident between the parties creates ongoing opportunities for joint development.” As well as the Macarthur project and the Mt Millar wind farm, Meridian has a number of other high quality wind development sites in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Decision 20100204 FINAL
    IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Application for resource consent made pursuant to Section 88 of the Act – TO Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (MWRC) Application Numbers: 104949, 104950, 104951, 104952 AND Tararua District Council (TDC) File Number: 12003.030 BY New Zealand Windfarms Limited IN RELATION TO To the development of an extension to the Te Rere Hau wind farm on the eastern side of the Tararua Ranges. The proposed Te Rere Hau Eastern Extension consists of 56 wind turbines located across approximately 300 hectares. Each turbine tower is 29 metres in height and reaches a maximum height of 47 metres with the tower and blade combined. Access to the proposed site will be off the Pahiatua Track via North Range Road. Decision of Joint Hearings Commissioners HEARING DATES: 6 – 14 October; 28-29 October; 11 November 2009 HEARING PANEL: David McMahon (Independent Commissioner and Chair) Cr Annette Main (MWRC Councillor) Cr Warren Davidson (TDC Councillor) DATE OF DECISION: 31 January 2010 Notice of Decision 1 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................5 2. THE PROPOSAL...........................................................................................................5 3. SITE LOCALITY AND DESCRIPTION.....................................................................6 Application Site..............................................................................................................................................6 Surrounding
    [Show full text]