Addendum to the 2008 Campus Master Plan Addendum to the Campus Master Plan

Campus Master Plan

ADDENDUM TO THE 2008 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Table of Contents

Maps

Completed Projects 2

Projects Under Construction 4

Additional Projects 6

Conceptual Changes 8

Updates to Projects in the 2008 Campus Master Plan

George Thomas Building 10

HPER Complex 11

Golf Practice Facility 12

Tennis Facilities 13

South Campus Housing 14

Updated Implementation

West Campus 18

East Campus 20

Cental Campus 22

South Campus 24

Research Park 26

Herritage Commons 28

1 5

2 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

2010 Completed Projects 2011 Completed Projects

Projects completed since 2008. These projects provide additional classroom space, research areas, and offices for faculty and staff in various departments, as well as practice space for several of the University of Utah sports teams at the new Mc- Carthy Field and Track.

Legend 6 Wilford W. & Dorothy P. Goodwill Humanitarian Building 7 1. 2. Frederick Albert Sutton Geology & Geophysics Building 3. Carolyn Tanner Irish Humanities Building 4. McCarthy Outdoor Field & Track 5. University Hospital West Pavilion Expansion 6. Red Butte Garden Amphitheater 7. Walter P. Cottam Visitors Center Expansion 8. Myriad Genetics Expansion 8

2008 Campus Master Plan

3 7

4 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

2010 Under Construction 2011 Projects Under Construction

Projects that are under construction. These projects account for additional classroom space, research space, faculty and staff space, as well as exhibition and hospital space.

Legend

1. David Eccles School of Business 2. Donna Garff Marriott Honors Residential Scholars Community 3. North Chiller Plant 4. James LeVoy Sorenson Molecular Biotechnology 9 Building - A USTAR Innovation Center 5. University Guest House Expansion 6. L.S. Skaggs Pharmacy Institute 7. Huntsman Cancer Institute Phase II B 8. University Neuropsychiatric Institute 9. Natural History Museum At Rio Tinto Center

8 2008 Campus Master Plan

5 3

6 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

2010 Additional Projects Additional 2010 2011 Additional Projects

Projects added to the 2008 Campus Master Plan. Included is an expansion of Rice-Eccles Stadium to increase seating at the south end, an upgrade to the Dee Glen Smith building for the University Football team; and replacement space for the Uni- versity Information Technology department.

Legend

1. Rice Eccles Stadium Expansion 2. Dee Glen Smith Expansion 3. University Information Technology Office Building

2008 Campus Master Plan

7 7

8 6

1 4 5

8 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

2010 Changes Conceptual 2011 Conceptual Changes

Projects that have been changed conceptually since the 2008 Campus Master Plan. Conceptual changes includes slight changes to the location of a project, the scope of the project, and may include changes to the footprints of the buildings. More information for select projects is included in this addendum.

Legend

1. College of Law (Site Update) 2. West Campus Parking Structure (Alternative Site Option) 3. George Thomas Building (See Page 10) 4. College of Fine Arts (Site Updtate) 5. South Campus Walk (Transit Hub Addition) 6. South Campus Parking Garage (Site Update) 7. Central Playing Fields (Site Update) 8. South Campus Housing (See Page 14) 9. West Village (Site Update)

2008 Campus Master Plan

9 George Thomas Building Pages 3-22, 3-23

2008 Text: Page 3-22: The Theatre Department within the College of Fine Arts has been sorely in need of upgraded academic facilities as well as a performance venue that provides seating for a smaller audience than is housed at the Pioneer Theatre. Theatre seeks a “black box” performance space. Page 3-23: Depending upon the success of the fund raising campaign underway for the College of Fine Arts and its priorities, the Theatre Department may begin their reuse efforts on the heels of the UMNH relocation.

Updated Text: The University will renovate the historic George Thomas Building on Presidents Circle and transform the building into a state-of-the-art center for scientific research and teaching. The Gary L. and Ann S. Crocker Science Center at the George Thomas Building will house the Center for Cell and Genome Science, modern classrooms and laboratories for innovative and interdisciplinary science and math education, and College of Science head- quarters.

As it appears in the 2008 Campus Master Plan: (Updated text is highlighted in red)

CHAPTER 3: DISCOVERY & ANALYSIS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Structural In the short term, prior to funding being available for Building Description: The original structure was built in the appropriate seismic and renovation upgrades, the 1933. This building received a non-structural remodel George Thomas Building could provide “swing” or in 1978. The approximate total square footage of the “surge” space for other building programs that need building is 86,900. The building has 3 floors. In addi- temporary homes while their current homes are being tion to the 3 floors, there is a basement. renovated or rebuilt. Possible candidates for this temporary reuse are the Park Building which is under current The foundation is a system of reinforced concrete con- renovation and/or The College of Law which has begun tinuous and spot footings. The roof framing is made up a study to determine the long term options for its right- of steel trusses clear spanning the exhibition space with sizing and future growth whether as a renovation to a concrete roof diaphragm. The roof and oors are sup- its existing building or the construction of a replace- ported by a concrete frame with un-reinforced masonry ment facility in its current location. The new UMNH wall which provides the lateral force resisting system. George Thomas - Building # 5 building is anticipated to open in 2009 or 2010. This This structure was originally constructed as the main Built: 1935 timing may not coincide with neighboring project surge library for the university and served this purpose until Size: 86,900 GSF space needs for the effective temporary use of George being replaced by the Marriott Library in 1968. The Utah Museum of Natural History George Thomas Building - Main Entrance at North Facade Thomas. Depending upon the success of the fund rais- 200 ft by 50 ft open exhibition space in the front of George Thomas Building ing campaign underway for the College of Fine Arts the building is approximately 40 ft to 50 ft high. This The George Thomas Building housed the University’s The Utah Museum of Natural History (UMNH) has and its priorities, the Theatre Department may begin space creates very high seismic shear forces in the roof first free standing Library. The original building con- occupied the George Thomas Building since 1968 when their reuse efforts on the heels of the UMNH reloca- diaphragm and also a significant potential for the exte- struction took place in 1933 and was finished in 1935 the Library moved its collections to the new Marriott tion. rior walls to buckle outward during an earthquake. The with help from the “Works Progress Administration” Library on the southeast portion of the campus. suspended floors were designed to support library stack (WPA). Flanking the southwest edge and providing a Mechanical Systems loads and therefore have adequate live load capacity for sense of completion to the newly defined oval compos- Programmatic Reuse Candidates The George Thomas Building’s original steam pipe most building uses. ing the Presidents Circle, its masonry stone exterior wall In the long term the Thomas Building will require heating system was converted to a high temp water was typical of the grandeur of the period for prominent significant seismic upgrade and preservation refurbish- heating system in 1974. This current 30 year old system RVS Information: This building received a final structur- institutional and civic construction. ment. The long term tenants of this building will face will require replacement during the renovation/upgrade. al score of -0.3 and given a seismic rating of very poor. considerable costs for this restoration, but the yield in Currently, the George Thomas Building along with its terms of quality of building aesthetic and durability will • District Steam Heat: four inch high pressure steam Seismic Deficiencies: The 1978 remodel did not include peer buildings on Presidents Circle comprise an historic surely equal the investment. Given its dominant posi- line from the Chemistry Building seismic upgrade provisions. Due to the un-reinforced district on campus that is listed in the National Register tion flanking the historic entry portal of the campus, • Primary cooling system: reciprocating chilled water masonry and terra cotta exterior, the building is con- of Historic Places. With this degree of stature, four of it occupies a prominent position in relationship to the system located in Basement Mechanical Room sidered very heavy. The roof diaphragm over the large the buildings in this cadre of historic structures have neighborhood. This is an optimum position for a build- • Supplementary cooling system: window mounted air exhibition area is inadequate to transfer the seismic undergone extensive renovation in meeting the national ing that could house civic or public interface programs conditioners and several DX split systems. shear forces. The un-reinforced masonry walls do not standard of historic preservation. The degree of his- along the primary “town and gown” edge. The Theatre • Constant volume air distribution system, original to have adequate capacity to transfer the seismic forces torical protection from severe remodeling that each of Department within the College of Fine Arts has been the building (70 years), inefficient and maintenance to the foundations. The tall exterior masonry walls at these buildings has had over the generations has been sorely in need of upgraded academic facilities as well as intensive the front of the building most probably do not meet a performance venue that provides seating for a smaller instrumental in determining their level of restoration minimum height to thickness ratios and will require audience than is housed at the Pioneer Theatre. Theatre and preservation. strengthening or bracing. seeks a “black box” performance space. 3 – 22 3 – 23

10 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN HPER Mall Pages 6-34, 6-35

2008 Text: Page 6-34: The north edge of the Student Life Center should define the build-to line for new buildings along HPER Mall.

Updated Text: The north edge of HPER North (Building #92) should define the build-to line for new buildings along HPER Mall.

As it appears in the 2008 Campus Master Plan: (Updated text is highlighted in red)

CHAPTER 6: TRANSFORMATIVE PROJECTS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Master Planning Guidelines: 1. Open Space Program: 3. Primary Entrances: 6. Preservation of Existing Features: HPER Mall is intended to be one of two major east- All primary building entries should be oriented discourage the use of these areas by cyclists and Healthy trees along the north edge of HPER Mall west connectors. As a connective landscape, it should towards HPER Mall. skateboarders. Pedestrian connections across HPER should be retained where feasible or relocated. be designed to facilitate movement but also scaled for Mall between the Fields and South Campus should pedestrian experience, with smaller gathering spaces 4. Service Access: also be thoughtfully integrated with changes in pave- 7. Sustainability: and entrance plazas incorporated along its length. Service access may be provided by the Shuttle Route ment or markings. Sustainability may be addressed in a variety of ways located along HPER Mall. at HPER Mall. As described above, landscaping 2. Building Placement: HPER Mall will contain the most visible aspect should include xeriscape planting and bioswales. The north edge of the Student Life Center should 5. Landscape Typolog y: of the proposed sustainable stormwater system. Permeable paving may be integrated into pedestrian define the build-to line for new buildings along As a new east-west landscape connector, HPER Mall Bioswales should be designed to include woody veg- plaza areas, and may also have the benefit of discour- HPER Mall. Setbacks of new buildings along HPER should be designed primarily to facilitate an engaging etation and trees along their edges so that they are aging bicycle and skateboard use of pedestrian zones. Mall should be eliminated or minimized in the inter- and safe pedestrian experience and the integration both functional and attractive. The benefits they est of enlivening the Mall and making it an actively of bicycle and shuttle routes. The pedestrian route provide include stormwater treatment, shade, wind used and vibrant campus corridor. should be intentionally designed to traverse plazas protection and habitat. with shade trees and seating areas in order to help

Playing Fields Bioswale Shuttle Utility Xeriscape Bike Path Entry Planting / Student Life Center Tunnel Planting Pedestrian Walk & Drop off

HPER Mall HPER Mall 6 – 34 6 – 35

11 Golf Practice Facility Pages 5-24, 5-25, 5-26, 5-27

2008 Text: Page 5-22: Other new recreation fields,including a small golf practice facility, are proposed...

Updated Text: The University is negotiating with Salt Lake City to relocate golf instruction to an off-campus site. This allows an opportunity to consider utilizing this area as a building site.

As it appears in the 2008 Campus Master Plan: (Updated text is highlighted in red)

CHAPTER 5: PLAN ELEMENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

EDERALE HEIGHTSH DR.DR DERAL HEIG

Campus & C ommunity

Considered the State’s “flagship” institution, the on the existing high-quality trees in Presidents Circle. University operates within the broader context of Salt These trees, in addition to the general landscape quality Lake City and the state of Utah, providing a focal point of Presidents Circle, are a vital and essential component for education, economic development, employment and of the University’s heritage and character and should be an array of community services in the areas of health, preserved to the greatest extent possible. Parking under recreation, athletics, and culture. Presidents Circle would also generate additional traffic that would have a highly negative impact on pedestrian The Plan proposes to meet its community objectives by comfort and safety in this area of campus. Additional creating new opportunities for on-campus community parking would negatively impact pedestrian move- activities and by improving access to existing and pro- ment at University Boulevard and the intersection of posed community facilities. University and 200 South, which is already a pedestrian hazard because of the unusual separation of crosswalks, Performing Arts & Culture stop lines and turning movements. A cluster of facilities offering arts and cultural entertainment programs to the public are located in the The Plan proposes development of a parking structure northwest quadrant of the campus, including Kingsbury at either the site currently occupied by ROTC/Mines Campus & Community Facilities Hall, David P. Gardner Hall, and the Pioneer Theatre. or at Parking Lot 3 located immediately west of the 1. David P Gardner Hall These venues, in particular, generate significant demand Center for Cell & Genome Science. The ROTC/Mines 2. J. T. Kingsbury Hall 3. George Thomas Building for parking facilities. Currently, demand exceeds sup- site is directly accessible from 100 South, but it is less 4. Simmons Pioneer Memorial Theatre ply. The University has been studying potential sites in convenient for pedestrians and an upgraded connection 5. Universe Project the northwest area of the campus, including underneath to Presidents Circle would be required as part of the 6. Rice-Eccles Stadium 7. Union Presidents Circle, and adjacent to 100 South on the project. Development of a parking structure adjacent to 8. Marriott Library site of the current Military Science (ROTC) and Mines the Chemistry Building would displace approximately 9. Golf Practice Facility buildings, for parking structures to accommodate the 100 existing parking spaces. However, the facility would 10. Alumni House 11. Central Playing Fields growing needs of patrons attracted to entertainment not require the demolition of existing buildings, and 12. Marcia & John Price Museum venues and to address the ongoing need for daytime it could potentially yield a greater numberof parking 13. South Campus Mixed-Use parking for students, faculty, staff, and visitors. The spaces. 14. University Medical Center 15. University Medical Center specific number of additional parking spaces required 16. Primary Children’s Medical Center to serve the northwest area of campus has not been Other cultural facilities located within the campus 17. John A. Moran Eye Center defined by the Plan, however the University’s North proper include the following: 18. John A. Moran Eye Center 19. Huntsman Cancer Institute West Quadrant Parking Structure Report of May 2007 20. University Hospital assumed that the approximate capacity of a northwest • Utah Museum of Fine Arts: The Utah Museum of Fine 21. Golf Practice Facility parking structure would be 608 spaces. Arts is Utah’s primary cultural resource for global 22. University Guest House 23. Fort Douglas Officer’s Club visual arts. It is unique in its dual role as a univer- 24. Fort Douglas Commander’s House The University has considered the development of a sity and state art museum. It is Utah’s only visual 25. Fort Douglas Museum parking structure beneath the current Presidents Circle arts institution that collects, exhibits, interprets, and 26. Huntsman Center Facility lawn. However, the Plan does not support this location preserves a comprehensive collection of original art 27. Cottam Visitors Center Open Space SUNNSU YSIDE AVE.AVE.VE 28. Utah Museum of Natural History due to the potential destructive impact of construction objects. Town & Gown Facilities 5 – 24 0200ft 500ft 1,000ft 5 – 25

CHAPTER 5: PLAN ELEMENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Clinical Facilities Child Care Centers Other Facilities • Fort Douglas Military Museum: The Museum preserves • University of Utah Hospital: The University Hospital is The University of Utah has the following on-campus Other facilities located on the campus proper and the history of Fort Douglas and Utah’s military heri- a tertiary care referral center. It is highly regarded child care facilities: used by the public include the Student Union, Marriott tage with a research library, exhibits and educational for programs in orthopedics, stroke, ophthalmology, • Bright Horizons, 419 Wakara Way Library, University Guest House, Commander’s House, programs. cancer, new born intensive care, radiology, fertility, • KinderCare, 545 S. Guardsman Way Officer’s Club, and Alumni House. • Utah Museum of Natural History: UMNH is designated cardiology, genetic related diseases and organ trans- • BioKIDs. Building #44 by the State of Utah as the State museum of natural plant. The hospital is also a nationally verified Level • ASUU Child Care Program, Alffred Emery Building history with responsibility for curation of archaeolog- I Trauma Center. • The Early Childhood Education Center, 1601 ical and vertebrate paleontological specimens recov- • Primary Children’s Medical Center (PCMC): The PCMC, University Village East ered on state lands. owned and operated by Intermountain Healthcare, • Head Start, West Community Center, 1945 East • Red Butte Garden: The Red Butte Garden is a non- is a charitable, community-owned, nonprofit health Sunnyside profit botanical and ecological center provided by care organization based in Salt Lake. Primary University of Utah. The Garden is the largest botani- Children’s Medical Center serves the needs of chil- There is an ongoing need for additional on-campus cal garden that tests, displays and interprets regional dren in the states of Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada child care facilities. The “Children’s Center” located horticulture in a 400 mile radius. The Garden has 18 and Montana. The hospital is equipped to treat adjacent to the Jewish Community Center has acres of display gardens and 2-3 miles of hiking trails. children with complex illness and injury and is rec- marked for the establishment of a new child ca The Walter P. Cottam Visitor Center, Courtyard ognized as one of the top children’s hospitals in the ity. An additional child care facility may also b Garden, Hemingway Four Seasons Garden and United States. at Research Park Dumke Floral Walk are part of the Red Butte • Moran Eye Center: The Moran Eye Center is the larg- Garden. est vision treatment and research center between the Since the Plan proposes demolition of Buildin West Coast and Texas. The new Moran Eye Center in order to accommodate the new Center for C Athletics & Recreation building located at Mario Capecchi Drive was offi- Genome Science, alternative accommodation f • Huntsman Arena: The 15,000-seat Huntsman Arena cially opened in 2006. The building includes 210,000 BioKIDS program is required. A potential rep was opened in 1969. It accommodates NCAA events square feet of treatment and surgical space. facility for the BioKIDs program could be inc for men’s and women’s basketball and gymnastics. • Huntsman Cancer Hospital & Institute: Huntsman into the South Campus TRAX mixed-use deve • Rice-Eccles Stadium: Rice-Eccles Stadium is the premier Cancer Institute is a nonprofit research and treatment The Campus Center Drive (Business Loop) pr stadium of the Intermountain region, serving the center and a National Cancer Institute-designated a convenient “kiss & drop” location for this p six-state area of Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, cancer center. The institute includes research, educa- facility. Colorado and Nevada. The stadium has a turf field tion, and patient care programs and facilities, among and seating for 45,000 spectators. The stadium them the 50-bed Huntsman Cancer Hospital, which underwent a 50-million-dollar renovation beginning is part of The University of Utah Hospitals and May 1997 and was completed September 1998. Clinics system • Other new recreation fields, including a small golf

practice facility, are proposed by the Plan which will

provide enhanced recreational opportunities for the Existing Child Care

general public. Existing Child Care (to be closed)

Potential Future Child Care 5 – 26 5 – 27

12 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Tennis Facilities Pages 5-22, 5-23, 6-24, 6-25

2008 Text: Page 5-22: NCAA Division I Tennis Facilities with 12 outdoor courts (depending on funding and confirmation of need by the University) may be included, and would take the place of two of the multi-use fields. Page 6-24: NCAA Division I tennis facilities with 12 outdoor courts may also be included should a need by demonstrated. If the University decides to build a new NCAA tennis facility, it should be located along Wasatch to the north of the Athletics track. This location affords the possibility of parking being integrated below the courts, with access from Wasatch, and also helps preserve open views from HPER Mall across the central portion of the Fields. Updated Text: NCAA Division I Tennis Facilities should be located near the George S. Eccles Tennis Center.

As it appears in the 2008 Campus Master Plan: (Updated text is highlighted in red)

CHAPTER 5: PLAN ELEMENTS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

EDERALE HEIGHTSH DR.DR DERAL HEIG

The Plan There are two pivotal components of the Athletics and beneath the track and/or tennis courts, could serve Recreation Plan for the University: the Student Life competitions. The existing Practice Women’s Softball Center and the Central Playing Fields. Diamonds, south east of Central Campus Drive, should be preserved in their existing location. The Student Life Center is envisioned as a large-scale, multi-purpose recreation facility which features over Both of these projects are described in greater detail in 150,000 square feet of indoor cardio, circuit and free the Transformative Projects chapter. weight areas, a climbing wall, natatorium with lap pool, leisure pool, running track, sport courts for basketball, soccer, volleyball, lacrosse, a multi-purpose room/ dance studios, wellness clinic, racquetball courts, locker rooms, classroom and meeting rooms, administrative offices, and a student lounge zone. To be sited on the Southwest end of HPER Mall within 5 minutes walk- ing distance from Fort Douglas Housing, and the proposed South Campus Housing, the Student Life Center will serve as an anchor for the expanded Athletics and Recreation program, and will increase student presence on campus. The existing Women’s Soccer Field near the Legacy Bridge landing should be preserved in its existing location, directly south of the Student Life Center.

The Central Playing Fields are the centerpiece of the exterior Athletics and Recreation Plan. The fields will be sited north of HPER Mall with the goal of creating synergy with the Student Life Center. The Fields include 7 multi-use recreation fields, as well as two NCAA Division 1 competition level facilities - an Athletics Track and Women’s Soccer Field, and a Women’s Softball Diamond to replace the one that will be dis- placed by the Student Life Center. NCAA Division I Tennis Facilities with 12 outdoor courts (depending on funding and confirmation of need by the University) may be included, and would take the place of two of Athletics the multi-use fields. NCAA facilities are clustered Golf Practice toward the upper, western area along Wasatch Drive so Intramural SUNNSU YSIDEYSIDE AVE.AVE.VE that below grade parking facilities, which may be built Recreation & Athletics Plan (Tennis Facility Alternative) 5 – 22 0 200ft500ft 1,000ft 5 – 23

CHAPTER 6: TRANSFORMATIVE PROJECTS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 5 – 22 5 – 23

Central Playing Fields A new cluster of terraced, multi-use recreation fields of HPER Mall and a new gateway into central campus and athletic facilities will create an active green center from Wasatch Drive. for the campus, ultimately replacing the Ozone parking lot, Lots 24 and 30, abandoned tennis courts, and If the University decides to build a new NCAA tennis 2

the practice driving range. Since this central campus facility, it should be located along Wasatch to the north Wasatch Drive area is currently dominated by paved surface parking of the Athletics track. This location affords the po-s Interdisciplinary Corridor and a jumble of outdated athletics facilities, the Central sibility of parking being integrated below the courts, Playing Fields are an extremely important project, and with access from Wasatch, and also helps preserve open their implementation will go a long way to reinvigorate views from HPER Mall across the central portion of student life on campus. The Central Playing Fields will the Fields. provide green frontage for HPER Mall, and also create a core campus space linking South Campus and North south pedestrain walkways linking HPER to 1 Interdisciplinary Corridor development to the north. Interdisciplinary Corridor are included along the grade 3 breaks between each row of fields. These walkways 6 In concept, the Central Playing Fields may comprise are primary connections, and include a basic level of three or four terraces to accommodate the slope and pedestrian amenities, including shade trees and seating. 7 allow for the integration of flat playing surfaces. The North-south pedestrian connections are also included; project includes a total of six multi-use recreation fields these walkways are of a smaller scale, and may take the (turf and synthetic), an NCAA Division I Athletics form of simple paths and/or steps with informal trees track and Women’s Soccer field, and an NCAA Division for shade along their edges. I Women’s Softball Diamond. NCAA Division I tennis 4 facilities with 12 outdoor courts may also be included The central pedestrian walkway which connects should a need be demonstrated. The two existing soft- HPER Mall to Interdisciplinary Corridor will be estab- 5 ball diamonds will remain, and form the lowest terrace lished above a north-south utility corridor serving along with one of the multi-use fields. North Campus, the Interdisciplinary Quad, and the Ambulatory Care Complex. The Athletics Track is intentionally sited on the top terrace so that seating can be integrated into the slope west Central Campus Drive of Wasatch Drive. As well, a parking structure (with access from Wasatch Dr.) may be incorporated below 8 Student Life Center the track. The existing slope also makes it possible for the parking structure to be exposed on its western edge, 1. Central Chiller Plant 2. Intramural Fields or Tennis Courts HPER Mall thereby providing natural ventilation and minimizing 3. Women’s Softball Field excavation. The Athletics Track also has an important 4. Pedestrian / Utility Corridor relationship with the proposed Student Life Center; as 5. Intramural Field 6. Athletics Track a primary athletics facility with outdoor seating its loca- 7. Stadium / Berm Seating tion here will help create a lively anchor for the east end 8. Bioswales Recreation & Athletics Fields 6 – 24 0 40ft 100ft 200ft 6 – 25

13 South Campus Housing Pages E-22, E-23

2008 Text: Page E-23: Buildings will be organized around garden courtyards internal to the site. These “outdoor rooms” will underscore the sense of community with common, intimate spaces that are comfortable, are well connected to the larger campus context and provide opportunities for social interaction and intellectual exchange by student residents. Updated Text: Information below is Referenced from the South Campus Housing Master Plan, May 2010* *(Additional information can be found in a forthcoming study: The University Housing Strategy / Analysis Report 2011) The proposed program can be realized in five- and six- story buildings, planned over podium structured parking. Internal streets and courtyards will be pedestrian oriented with vehicular access limited to service and emergency egress. A centrally located community commons will ultimately link the various phases of developments, building upon the precedent of Phase I’s Café/Convenience Store. Courtyards within the subsequent phases will offer spaces for more intimate gatherings, as well as opportunities for distinctive viewing gardens.

The urban design strategy at the corner of Mario Cepecchi Drive and South Campus Drive is to set the apartments back from the intersection, utilizing a landscape buffer to mitigate noise and create views. Along South Campus Drive, the residential buildings are edge-loaded, which breaks down the scale of the street wall, invites daylight deep into the community spaces, regardless of seasonal fluctuation. The north and west perimeters of the site are maximized as build-to limits, which increases accommodation and better defines the character of the adjacent uses (e.g. enhancing the formal quality of the Huntsman Center and open space quality of the multi- purpose field). Like the Donna Garff Marriott Residential Scholars Community, building massing is varied and attuned to the solar orientation.

That said, even with the reduced program from the estimated 1,800 units defined in the 2008 Campus Master Plan to 1600 beds in the 2010 Campus Master Plan Addendum, this level of density is unique for student housing at the University of Utah, with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) greater than 1.6. Increasing the densities of these planned communities will result in a dramatic transformation for student life on campus.

As it appears in the 2008 Campus Master Plan: (Updated text is highlighted in red)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

South Campus Housing Student Life Center 1 The Plan envisions the development of a village of single student housing located at the current Annex site. The residential buildings may be stacked apartments located above structured parking. To reinforce the importance of South Campus Drive and Mario

ih c c e p a C oira M Capecchi Drive as a major campus gateway, the building will posi- 3 evirD tively address the adjacent streets and provide a distinctly urban character that is appropriate at this location.

2 Buildings will be organized around garden courtyards internal to the site. These “outdoor rooms” will underscore the sense of community with common, intimate spaces that are comfortable, are well con- 4 Hempstead Road nected to the larger campus context and provide opportunities for social interaction and intellectual exchange by student residents.

Huntsman Center

South Campus Drive 1. Fort Douglas TRAX 2. Parking Lot 22 3. South Campus Housing Phase I 4. South Campus Housing Phase II

South Campus Walk The Plan proposes to transform South Campus into an iconic

mixed-use gateway featuring a clear, direct, and safe pedestrian HPER Mall connection into the core campus area. The Plan envisions a sweeping 13 pedestrian pathway – South Campus Walk – linking South Campus 12 TRAX to HPER Mall. South Campus Walk will feature high quality paving materials, lighting, seating, and shade trees which support a Huntsman Center 11 comfortable pedestrian environment. Mixed-use shopfront buildings 10 Campus Center Drive will face onto South Campus Drive and will offer campus-centric 7 retail that complements other existing on-campus retail at the 9 ground floor. Upper floors may be used by the University as offices 5

and/or classrooms. 8 6 4 3

1. South Campus TRAX Station 7. Parking Structure 2. Shopfront Buildings 8. Plaza 3. Shopfront Buildings 9. David Eccles School of Business 2 4. South Campus Walk 10. David Eccles School of Business 1 5. V. Randall Turpin University 11. College of Education Services Building 12. College of Education 6. Possible Graduate Education Center 13. Infill Classrrom Building E – 22 E – 23

14 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN South Campus Housing (continued) Pages 4-10, 4-11

2008 Text: Page 4-9: South Campus Village: Student Apartments with 1800 units.

As it appears in the 2008 Campus Master Plan: (Updated text is highlighted in red)

CHAPTER 4: GROWTH PROJECTIONS THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Table 4-8 Summary - Capital Development Existing Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Total GSF GSF GSF GSF GSF West Campus • Carolyn Tanner Irish Humanities Building: Currently • Utah Museum of Fine Arts (UFMA) Addition: Gallery Existing 2,052,313 under construction. Program includes 14 offices, building with gallery spaces and offices. New2 46,000 171,345 431,104 848,449 Demolition 43,542 10,177 83,639 137,358 1 Conference Room and 7 Dance Studios. Total2 ,254,771 2,415,939 2,763,404 3,474,495 • Central Campus Plant: Chiller plant with a capacity of North Campus Existing 649,590 • College of Humanities Phase II: Academic classroom 3000 tons. New1 80,000 200,000 795,700 1,175,700 building with classrooms, support space, staff and Demolition - - 60,000 60,000 • Universe Project: Student Apartments with 300 units faculty offices. Total8 29,590 1,029,590 1,765,290 2,880,990 and ground-floor retail. East Campus Existing 3,503,132 • College of Health: Academic classroom building with • USTAR Interdisciplinary Research Facilities: Research New9 52,067 762,000 2,194,700 3,908,767 classrooms, support space, staff and faculty offices. Demolition - 123,624 756,885 880,509 facility with nanofabrication lab, wet and dry labs, Total4 ,455,199 5,093,575 6,531,390 9,559,648 core facilities, conference center facilities and offices. South Campus • College of Law: Academic classroom building for Existing 1,335,513 College of Law with classrooms, support space, staff New3 61,500 457,892 593,360 1,412,752 • College of Nursing Expansion: Clinical teaching facility Demolition 31,576 77,793 99,330 208,699 and faculty offices. expansion. Total1 ,665,437 2,045,536 2,539,566 3,743,619 Central Campus • College of Fine Arts Gallery Expansion: Additional gallery Existing 1,076,468 • South Campus TRAX Project: Classroom building with New7 2,510 - 451,000 523,510 space as well as the support functions. multipurpose academic classrooms and staff offices, Demolition - - - - Total1 ,148,978 1,148,978 1,599,978 2,123,488 “neighborhood” retail with coffee shop, newsstand • Milton Bennion Hall Expansion: Academic classroom Heritage Commons and a bakery. Existing 1,323,773 building for College of Education with classrooms, New1 20,100 - - 120,100 support space, staff and faculty offices. • South Campus Village: Student Apartments with 1800 Demolition - - - - Total 1,443,873 1,443,873 1,443,873 1,563,973 units. Guardsman Way • Frederick Albert Sutton Geology & Geophysics Building: Existing 434,699 Currently under construction. Program includes 61 • University Hospital Expansion: Patient care facility. New - - - - offices, 5 Conference Rooms, 45 Labs and 3 38-per- Demolition - - - - Building currently under construction. Total4 34,699 434,699 434,699 434,699 son classrooms. Research Park • School of Medicine Replacement: Clinical and scientific Existing 2,924,687 • Chemistry Expansion: Scientific teaching building for New1 40,000 115,000 542,000 797,000 teaching facility. Demolition - - - - College of Chemistry with classrooms, class-lab/ Total3 ,064,687 3,179,687 3,721,687 4,518,687 research-labs, support space, staff and faculty offices. • Additional Housing at Historic Fort Douglas: Student Villages Existing 756,873 Apartments with 300 units. New - - 746,256 - • Center for Cell & Genome: Scientific teaching building Demolition - - 746,256 - for College of Biology. Program includes 12 research • University Guest House Expansion: University Guest Total7 56,873 756,873 756,873 756,873 East Bench labs, support space, staff and faculty offices. House (Hotel) expansion with 70 rooms. Existing 22,444 New9 ,345 125,022 - 134,367 • Social Work Expansion: Classroom building for College • West Village Redevelopment: Demolition of existing fam- Demolition - - - - of Social Work. Program includes 3 - 120 seat class- ily student apartments currently located at the East & Total3 1,789 156,811 156,811 291,178 Total Existing 14,079,492 14,079,492 16,285,896 17,905,561 21,713,571 rooms, 2 Conference rooms and 8 Offices. West villages. Development of replacement student Total New2 ,281,522 1,831,259 5,554,120 8,920,645 apartments at the West Village. Total Demolition 75,118 211,594 1,746,110 1,286,566 Total1 6,285,896 17,905,561 21,713,571 4 – 10 4 – 11

15 South Campus Housing (continued) Pages 5-14, 5-15

2008 Text: Page 5-14: South Campus Village: 1,800 apartments adjacent to the Fort Douglas TRAX Station located below the Eccles Legacy Bridge at the site currently occupied by the Annex building.

Updated Text: Information below is Referenced from the South Campus Housing Master Plan, May 2010* *(Additional information can be found in a forthcoming study: The University Housing Strategy / Analysis Report 2011) Page 5-14: South Campus Village: 1,600 beds and 700 parking stalls in five- and six- story buildings, planned over podium structured parking adjacent to the Fort Douglas TRAX Station located below the Eccles Legacy Bridge at the site currently occupied by the Annex building.

Project Update:

The first phase of South Campus Housing, The Donna Garff Marriott Honors Residential Scholars Community, is anticipated to be complete in July of 2012. The project is 158,392 GSF and will provide approximately 310 beds for Honors students and resident advisors. The first floor of the building will house the Honor Academic Experience: the Big Ideas Room – the home of the Engaged Learning Initiative, two seminar rooms, a library, a music room, and five Honors faculty and administrative offices. The central focus of the building –a large community hub called the Honors Commons-is designed to flow from interior spaces to the outside. Each residential wing of the building is centered among a series of “Honors Towers” which provide both conceptual and functional identities to the space.

As it appears in the 2008 Campus Master Plan: (Updated text is highlighted in red)

CHAPTER 5 : PL AN ELEMENTS THE UNIVERSI TY O F UTAH C AM PUS MA STER P LA N

In response to the anticipated future growth in demand for on-campus student housing, the Plan demonstrates the potential for up to 2,400 student apartments to be developed, over a number of years, as follows:

• Universe Project: 300 apartments located above ground floor retail

• South Campus Village: 1,800 apartments adjacent to the Fort Douglas TRAX Station located below the Eccles Legacy Bridge at the site currently occupied by the Annex building.

• H eritage Commons: 300 apartments located at the eastern end of the George S. Eccles 2002 Legacy Bridge.

Existing Campus Housing at Heritag e Commons Existing Campus Housing at Heritag e Commons Table 5 - 1: Housing Supply Projection

Housing Supply Projection 2006 Phase 1 & 2P hase 3 Undergraduate Students 22,155 22,354 25,271 Graduate Students 6,4646 ,522 7,373 Total Students 28,619 28,8763 2,644

Residence Hall beds 1,6811 ,681 1,681 Single Student Apartments (beds) 5085 08 1,708 Family Student Apartments (units) 1,1101 ,110 1,110

New Single-Student Apartments 1,2001 ,200

Total residence beds / single stu- 2,1893 ,389 4,589 dent apartment beds Ratio of beds to 7.6% 11.7%1 4.1% Undergraduate Students

5 – 14 Stud ent Apartment Preced ent - UC San Francisco Stud ent Apartment5 Preced– ent15 - UC Berkeley

16 17 P1

B05

W39 W22

W36 L8 L3 W37

P22 W21 P22

W35

W40

W41

18 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Capital Development West Campus Projection

East Campus North Campus

Central Campus Historic Fort Douglas / Herritage Commons West Campus South Fort Campus Douglas

Research Park

# Name GSF Bldg 5 George Thomas Renovation - W2 Universe Project 156,000 W21 College of Law Expansion - W22 Infill Teaching Lab - W35 College of Law 100,500 W36- Infill Teaching Lab (Science) 309,100 W39 W40 Stadium Expansion - W41 Dee Glenn Smith Upgrade & Expansion - L3 Science Yard Landscape - L8 Science Yard Improvements - P1 Northwest Parking Structure 480 Stalls West Campus Parking Structure P22 350 Stalls (Two Sites Under Consideration) 19 E49 E10

P9 E50

E47 L10

E8 E24

E6 E51

E7 E52 E48 E54 E53

E56

20 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Capital Development East Campus Projection

East Campus North Campus

Central Campus Historic Fort Douglas / Herritage Commons West Campus South Fort Campus Douglas

Research Park

E55

P18

U7 # Name GSF E6 PCMC Ambulatory Care 220,000 E7 University Ambulatory Phase I 100,000 E8 University Ambulatory Phase II 200,000 E57 E24 HSC Academic (521 Replacement) 276,000 E24 HSC Research (521 Replacement) 317,000 E24 HSC Hospital Support (521 Replacement) 49,000 E47 PCMC Ambulatory II 220,000 E48 Moran Eye Center III 200,000 E49 PCMC Hospital 625,000 E50 Infill - Medical Research Lab 96,140 E58 E51- Infill -Clinical Facility 469,000 E54 E55- Infill - Medical Research Lab 384,560 E58 E10 Huntsman Cancer Institute, Phase III 200,000 L10 HSC Plaza - P9 Parking Structure 257 Stalls P18 Parking Structure 286 Stalls Proposed Medical Drive East U7 - (Formerly Lot 66) 21 C67

C64 F8 F8

L7 F8 C65

C63

C66

22 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Central Campus Central Capital Development Projection

East Campus North Campus

Central Campus Historic Fort Douglas / Herritage Commons West Campus South Fort Campus Douglas

Research Park

# Name GSF C63 Campus Learning Center 150,000 C64- Infill - Classroom Building 301,000 C66 University Information Tech Office Build- C67 - ing F2 Women's Softball Field - F7 Intramural Fields - F8 Intramural Fields - L7 Bioswales - U5 Central Campus Drive Extension - 23 L1

S30

S59

L11 S13

B36 S27 L5

S61

S27

S28

24 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Capital Development South Campus South Projection

East Campus North Campus

Central Campus Historic Fort Douglas / Herritage Commons West S14 Campus South Fort Campus Douglas

Research Park

S60

# Name GSF Bldg College of Fine Arts Renovation - 36 Beverly Taylor Sorensen Arts & Education S13 37,000 Complex S14 Student Life Center 157,500 S27 South Campus Mixed Use 103,000 S28 Utah Museum of Fine Arts Expansion 38,250 S30 College of Health 60,000 S59 College of Humanities Expansion II 88,400 S60 South Campus Housing Phase II 360,000 S61- Infill - Classroom Building 144,960 S62 L1 HPER Mall Landscape Treatments - L5 South Campus Walk - L11 Landscape Treatments - P2 Business Loop Parking Structure 925 Stalls 25 P14

R69 R68

26 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Capital Development Research Park Research Projection

East Campus P12 North Campus Central Campus Historic Fort Douglas / R20 Herritage Commons West Campus South Fort Campus Douglas

Research Park

R67

P13

P14

R68

# Name GSF R20 ARUP Expansion 100,000 R67 Research Infill 110,000 P14 R68 Business Incubator 432,000 R69 West Village Redevelopment 746,256 P12 ARUP Parking Structure TBD P13 Research Infill Parking Structure 330 Stalls P14 Business Incubator Parking Structure 985 Stalls 27 H18

28 ADDENDUM TO THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

Herritage Commons Capital Development Projection

East Campus North Campus

Central Campus Historic Fort Douglas / Herritage Commons West Campus South Fort Campus Douglas

Research Park

# Name GSF H18 Student Apartments 90,000 29