arXiv:2009.10983v2 [gr-qc] 27 Jan 2021 n eyrcnl,o iaybakhl egrwt a with merger hole black 150 holes, of binary black mass a lightest total of the recently, for and very models stars theoretical and by neutron given heaviest bounds the mass the out ing 1–2,o opc betwt as2 masses mass solar with two object example compact with a for stars of [10–12], them neutron of among of observations GR, list to the above of related the shortcomings Issues to current contribute high others. also the between objects with 9], astrophysical unification [8, space- the physics of and energy energy existence dark [7], the the singularities [1–6], on time problems light matter shed dark to and order in proposed been eprtrsd o reach not do temperatures nsetocpclyosre e wrswt masses with dwarfs present red not observed M is hy- line for spectroscopically lithium needed required one the in the Therefore, temperature than the fusion. lower drogen is, is burning that lithium - for Sequence Main the vr uigteHysicnrcinpaetoeyoung More- those lithium gravity. phase fuse of contraction theories stars Hayashi constrain tracks the Hayashi to con- during and used fully over, of Sequence be limit Main can mass’ [21] the upper on an stars as brown vective well of se- as of process main [20], context cooling minimum dwarfs [16–19], the that (MMSM) shown in mass was study quence it to - objects gravity interesting modified be to out tmypoielmt nteae fLSindividuals. LMS of ages the on however, age; limits is similar provide of method may groups boundary it also stars’ depletion to It applied lithium usually determination. the age that clusters’ means range globular age young the in for age [25– clusters’ quantity 20 determine of age-dependent to allows an It is 28]. stars sequence main [24]. sub- luminosity (and effective and of stellar temperature regions cool overlapping and occupying low-mass objects when stellar) very case with the in deals distinguish stars one to Sequence order Main in from test used dwarfs is lithium brown ideal, called not fact, although This 23], [22, burning. lithium for quired ∗ [email protected] r-ansqec o-assas( stars low-mass sequence Pre-main ayatraie oGnrlRltvt G)have (GR) Relativity General to alternatives Many h ihu bnac ttepoopeei h pre- the in photosphere the at abundance lithium The . − 0 0 y,bigoeo h otrlal methods reliable most the of one being Myr, 200 . 5 M ⊙ tr n lblrcutr fte eyo h ih element light the on ag rely to they uncertainty if additional clusters an globular introduce and stars may This strated. ncnrs obondaf hs core whose dwarfs brown to contrast in h eedneo ihu bnac nmdfidgaiyi lo in gravity modified on abundance lithium of dependence The ihu bnac sagaiainlmdldpnetquant dependent model gravitational a is abundance Lithium .INTRODUCTION I. M 7 ⊙ iwihdpee eoete reach they before depletes which Li 1,15]. [14, ∼ nvriyo at,W swli1 01 at,Estonia Tartu, 50411 1, Ostwaldi W. Tartu, of University 2 1 . aoaoyo hoeia hsc,Isiueo Physics, of Institute Physics, Theoretical of Laboratory 5 × 10 M 6 . 6 . hc sre- is which K M 0 ⊙ . 5 1]sneak- [13] M ⊙ nt Wojnar Aneta turn ) fteRcisaa,oedaswt t eea functional, general its with deals Lagrangian one linear scalar, the Ricci considering of the instead of - GR of tion fPalatini of on o-assa ihrsett h Rmdl In model. GR the to section respect last the with a star of low-mass luminosities will and young we ages and temperatures, gravity central Palatini examine in abundance elements light h tla ecito nNwoinlmt h section The limit. Newtonian in alters which description gravity of stellar model dependence other the any similar in appear a also however, will - dependence mentioned ovninwhile convention unott edpneto rvttoa oe.In model. gravitational a on stars section dependent low-mass next be the in to abundance out lithium turn the that work this stars depletion young lithium method. of the boundary discussion, from ages obtained following the clusters to globular the and uncertainty in new a demonstrate we introduces what to but, like mentioned, and already tests would [31] provide as gravity only (see not modified gravity does for modified fact That by altered therein). references be the to which by out equation, turn modelled equilibrium be sim- hydrostatic can the non-relativistic stars to low-mass Due relations, [30]. electron plified important when contraction, being of starts stages degeneracy with last polytrope the well-mixed during a even as modelled they is convective, be paper, fully can this Being in use description. to theoretical going their are we which stars, low-mass avoid convec- 28]. to and [27, allows atmosphere models technique tion to the related parameter uncertainties free further temper- a effective as the star’s ature obser- keeping instance, with provide for Together not to, metallicity. do related stellar [29] they uncertainties on why vational weakly is depend which from method obtained compositions, depletion assump- ages few lithium theoretical very the the with Furthermore, ground, physical tions. solid on method the built since is estimation age for calibrate used to techniques employed other is procedure the importantly, More III Palatini e sadta euete( the use we that add us Let aigti nmn,w r on odmntaein demonstrate to going are we mind, in this Having sequence pre-main the of feature prominent Another ilpoieu h anseso h eiainof derivation the of steps main the us provide will 1, ∗ elto method. depletion eemnto ehiuso young of techniques determination e I PALATINI II. f f ( R ( -asselrojcsi demon- is objects stellar w-mass R rvt soeo h ipetgeneraliza- simplest the of one is gravity ) IV rvt o hc ewl rsn the present will we which for gravity ) II κ ewl reyrcl h anfeatures main the recall briefly will we ewl ocueorfindings. our conclude will we = − 8 c πG 4 [32]. f ( R − ) + ercsignature metric ++) + GRAVITY ity n 3 = / 2 2 such as: A. Non-relativistic stars in Palatini gravity 1 S = S + S = √ gf( )d4x + S [g , ψ ], (1) g m 2κ − R m µν m In what follows, we will consider the quadratic Z where = µν g is the Ricci scalar. It is however con- (Starobinski) model R R µν structed with the metric g and Ricci tensor built of 2 µν Rµν f( )= + β , (7) the independent connection Γˆ since the common assump- R R R tion on g-metricity of Γˆ is discarded. The field equations where β is the model parameter with the dimension [m2], are provided by the variation of (1) with respect to the for which it was shown that the non-relativistic Palatini metric gµν stars can be described by the equations [19, 44] 1 dp Gm(˜r)ρ(˜r) f ′( ) µν f( )gµν = κTµν , (2) = , (8) R R − 2 R dr˜ − Φ(˜r)˜r2 where Tµν is the energy momentum tensor of the matter r˜ 2 2 δSm field, Tµν = . In the further part of this paper m = 4πx ρ(x)dx , (9) − √ g δgµν 0 we will assume− a perfect fluid form. The prime in (2) Z 2 2 2 denotes the derivative with respect to the function’s ar- wherer ˜ = Φ(˜r)r and Φ(˜r) f ′( )=1+2κc βρ(˜r). df( ) The transformation to the Jordan≡ frameR and the Taylor gument, that is, f ′( ) = d R . On the other hand, the R R expansion around β = 0 will provide the modified hydro- variation with respect to the independent connection Γˆ static equilibrium equation as gives µν 2 ˆ (√ gf ′( )g )=0, (3) p′ = gρ(1 + κc β[rρ′ 3ρ]) , (10) ∇β − R − − which demonstrates that ˆ is the covariant derivative where g = const is the surface gravity assumed to be a ∇β calculated with respect to Γ.ˆ In other words, it is the constant Levi-Civita connection of the conformal metric hµν Gm(r) GM g 2 2 , (11) h = f ′( )g . (4) ≡ r ∼ R µν R µν The trace equation, obtained by contracting (2) with the where M = m(R) and R is a star’s radius. On the other metric gµν , is hand, the transformation of the mass function m(˜r) to m(r) is dependent on the energy density which will drop f ′( ) 2f( )= κT, (5) R R− R however to zero on the non-relativistic star’s surface. Be- where T is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor, cause of that, the derivation of the mass function has a 2 and it allows to obtain the relation = (T ) for some simple form m′(r)=4πr ρ(r) in the Jordan frame, thus chosen functional f( ). R R we may write An important featureR of the Palatini gravity, which m =8πrρ +4πr2ρ . (12) can be derived easily from (5), is that in the vacuum it ′′ ′ provides Einstein vacuum solution with the cosmological Using this and (11) in (10), one writes constant, independently of the form of f( ). Further- R g more, in the case of analytic f( ) one deals with the p′ = gρ 1+8β . (13) same center-of-mass orbits as in GRR [33]. Therein, it was − c2r   also demonstrated that the modifications of energy and As discussed already in the introductory section, our momentum present in Euler equation are not sensitive concern are low-mass stars whose equation of state can to the experiments performed so far for the solar system be modelled by a simple polytropic relation orbits. This may change when atomic level experiments will be available, though [34–36]. p = Kργ, (14) We may rewrite the field equations (2) as dynamical which together with the hydrostatic equilibrium provides equations for the conformal metric hµν [37–39] and the the Palatini Lane-Emden equation [44]: undynamic scalar field defined as Φ = f ′( ): R 1 1 2 2 2 1 dΦ 2 ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ 1 d 2κ c ρcα (Φ + 2 ξ dξ ) Rµν hµν R = κTµν hµν U(Φ) (6a) √Φξ θ θn+1 = θn, − 2 − 2 ξ dξ2 − n +1 − √    Φ 2 (15) ΦR¯ (Φ U¯(Φ))′ = 0 (6b) n 2 − where Φ = 1+2αθ with α defined as α = κc βρc, while ¯ Φ f( ) the dimensionless variables θ and ξ are given by where U(Φ) = R −Φ2 R and the energy momentum ten- 1 sor in the Einstein frame is given by T¯ = Φ− T . n n+1 µν µν r = rcξ, ρ = ρcθ , p = pcθ , (16) Let us notice that prime here denotes the derivative with respect to Φ. Such a representation can significantly sim- 2 (n + 1)pc rc = 2 . (17) plify given physical problems [40–43]. 4πGρc 3

The function θ(ξ) is the solution of the (modified) Lane- where the non-resonant reaction rate for the temperature Emden equation (15) with respect to the radial coor- range T < 6 106K is given by × dinate ξ = rρc 8πG/(2pc) which crosses zero at ξR. 1 3 2/3 3 cm Here, pc and ρc denote the central pressure and den- NA σv = SfscrT − exp aT − , (26) p 1 h i c6 − c6 s g sity, respectively, while n = γ 1 is the polytropic index − h i 6 of (14). More detailed discussion about Palatini Lane- where Tc6 Tc/10 K and fscr is the screening correc- Emden equation, its solutions, and features can be found tion factor≡ while S and a are dimensionless parameters in [21, 44–46]. in the fit to the reaction rate. For our range of tempera- The solution of the modified Lane-Emden equation tures, the proton-capture rate parameters for the reaction (15) provide the star’s mass, radius, central density, and 7Li(p, α) 4He are S =7.2 1010 and a = 84.72 [28, 47, 48]. temperature via the well-known expressions (see e.g [32]) Since we are dealing× with polytropic stars with the

3 polytropic index n =3/2, the temperature is T = Tcθ(ξ) M =4πr ρcωn, (18) 3/2 c while density is expressed as ρ = ρcθ (ξ). Therefore, n 3− K n n−1 the central temperature Tc and central density ρc for that R = γ M n−3 , (19) n G model are modified (via δ, ξR and θ′) and given by   2 3M 3 6 µeff M R δ ρc = δn , (20) T =1.15 10 ⊙ 5 K 4πR3 c 1 × 0.6 0.1M R 3 3   ξ ( θ′(ξR)) 1    ⊙    R Kµ n − T = ρc θn, (21) (27) kB M R 3 g ρc =0.141 ⊙ δ (28) where kB denotes the Boltzmann constant, µ the mean 0.1M R cm3 molecular weight while K contains information about gas  ⊙    mixture and degeneracy of the stellar material. The con- while the radius, when taking into account an arbitrary stants (22) and (24) depend on the central energy density degeneracy degree η and mean molecular weight µeff, is via Φ and its derivation with respect to ξ, which is a com- 1 2 3 mon feature of Palatini theories of gravity: R 7.1 10− γ 0.1M ×2 2 ⊙ , (29) R ≈ 3 3 M 3 ⊙ µeffµe F (η)   ξ2Φ 2 dθ 1/2 ωn = ξ=ξ , (22) − 1 Φξ dξ | R where F (η) is the nth order Fermi-Dirac function. In- 1+ 2 ξ Φ n −1 1 n serting the Lane-Emden temperature, energy density and n − −3 3− 3 n γn = (4π) n (n + 1) n ωn ξR, (23) radius to (25) and changing the variables to the spatial

ξR ones we will have δn = − 1 . (24) − Φ 2 dθ d 4πX ρ2R3 S u 2 3 Φ c 1 ξ dξ ξ=ξR lnf = 1+ 2 ξ Φ | 3 dt − ξR M NAmH a ξ   In the next section we will use the above relations to R 7 1 2 3 1/3 calculate the lithium depletion rate (which can be also fscrξ θ exp( uθ− )dξ , (30) × 0 − s easily generalized for resonant rates). Z 1/3 where u aT6− . Approximately, the burning process is restricted≡ to the central region of the star, thus we III. LITHIUM BURNING IN LOW-MASS MAIN may apply the near center solution of the modified Lane- SEQUENCE STARS Emden equation (15) to the depletion rate (30) ξ2 ξ2 As already discussed, fully convective low-mass stars θ(ξ 0) 1 exp , (31) are very-well described by the formalism given in the sub- ≈ ≈ − 6 ≈ − 6   section (II A). In such stars, the lithium-to-hydrogen ra- which after applying the numerical constants yields tio f changes due to the effective convection which mixes lithium-poor and lithium-rich regions throughout a star d X 0.6 3 0.1M 2 such that the mixing timescale is much shorter than the lnf = 6.54 ⊙ dt − 0.7 µeff M contraction and lithium destruction times (that is, the      3  2 star is well mixed). Apart from this process, the proton- 7 17 u 7 − 2 Sf a u− 2 e− 1+ ξ ( θ′(ξ )). capture reactions also contribute to the rate of change of × scr u R − R   f. Thus, the depletion rate in a star with mass M and (32) hydrogen fraction X can be written in the following way The integration of the above equation requires the knowl- df Xf M edge of the dependence of the central temperature pa- M = ρ σv dM, (25) dt −m h i rameter u on time. In order to find it, let us consider H Z0 4

Stefan-Boltzman equation together with the virial theo- Integrating the above equation from u0 = to u and rem after the transformation to the Jordan frame using the properties of the incomplete gamma∞ function 2 gives 2 4 3 GM dR L =4πR Teff = Ω , (33) −7 R2 dt 6 3 f0 13 4 X 0.6 M where the factor ln =1.15 10 T3eff− ⊙ F ≡ f × 0.7 µeff M 4       3 3 4 2 Φ 2 − 16 ξR( θ′(ξR)) Ω Sfscra g(u) − , (42) Ω= 1 Φ′ (34) × δ2 1+ 2 ξR Φ ! 37/2 u appears due to the frame transformation[45]. Therefore, where g(u)= u− e− 29Γ( 37/2,u) with the func- tion Γ( 37/2,u) being an− upper− incomplete gamma func- it is straightforward to get the radius and luminosity as − functions of time during the contraction phase tion. For a given depletion , the central temperature T is obtained from u( ) whileF the star’s age, radius, 2 4 1 c 3 3 3 F R 1 M 3000K Myr and luminosity are specified by the equations (37), (35), =0.85Ω 3 (35) and (36), respectively. Each of those, as demonstrated, R 0.1M Teff t ⊙  ⊙   4   4  2 is altered by Ω, γ, δ, ξR, θ(ξR), and θ′(ξR) whose values 3 3 3 L 2 M Teff Myr depend on the applied model of gravity. =5.25 10− Ω , L × 0.1M 3000K t Using the similar approach, one may write down the ⊙  ⊙      (36) depletion equation (42) for resonant rates (see e.g ([28])), where j =2/3 stands for the non-resonant reactions, while the contraction time is given by 4 6 3 R 3000K 0.1M f0 13 4 X 0.6 M ln =1.15 10 T − ⊙ tcont 841.91 ⊙ (37) F ≡ f × 3eff 0.7 µ M ≡−dR/dt ≈ Teff M    eff        4 2 3 3 2 18 3j ξR( θ′(ξR)) Ω 0.6 Tc ξR( θ′(ξR))Ω Sf a − g(u) − , (43) − Myr. scr δ2 × µ 3 106K δ2 ×  eff   ×  41/2 3j u 68 15j 41 with g(u)= u− − e− − Γ( 3j, u). From the relation (29) and (35) we may also write down − 2 − 2 − the degeneracy parameter as a function of time The equations (42) and (43) can be solved numerically or be fitted to the observational data; however, we may 2 4 1/3 3 2 γ 0.1M T3efft6 also find an approximate formula for the central temper- µ F (η) 8.36 10− ⊙ eff 1/2 ≈ × Ω1/3 M µ2 ature at the time of depletion. Thus, we will compare    e  (38) the local nuclear destruction time at the center of the star (X = 0.7 being the hydrogen mass fraction while 6 24 where T3eff Teff/3000K and t6 t/10 . Then, using mp 1.67 10− g is the proton mass) (27) together≡ with (29),(35), and (≡38) we find ≈ × 2 2/9 2/9 mp 7 M µ F (η) tdest = =4.92 10− (44) u M e 1/2 Xρ σv × 0.1M =1.15 4 ⊙ a 0.1M t T h i 7   6 3eff ! 3 a  ⊙  3 − 1 3 µeff Tc6 / δ 1/3 Tc6 5 2/3 2/3 e 5 yr ξ Ω ( θ′(ξR)) × 0.6 Sf ξ θ (ξ ) R − , (39) scr R ′ R × γδ2/3     to the contraction time (37). The approximation tcont = which relates the central temperature Tc with the time tdest works well so long as the star can be described by during the contraction phase. the polytropic equation of state with n = 3/2 (the de- Let us consider the case M & 0.2M , that is, when ⊙ generacy is not important): the degeneracy effects are not important andµ ˙ eff can be 1/3 neglected when compared to R˙ . Then, since u = aT − a ξ7 θ (ξ )2Ω µ c6 = 31.78 + ln(Sf ) + ln R ′ R 6ln eff and using (27) will provide du/dR = u/(3R), such that 1/3 scr 3 T δ − 0.6 c6     d dlnf ∂u dlnf uR˙ M T 16 lnf R˙ = (40) 3ln 4ln eff + lnT . (45) dt ≈ du ∂R du 3R − 0.1M − 3000K 3 c6  ⊙    which allows to write the depletion rate as Let us now consider a star with Teff = 3500K, the mass 6 3 dlnf 13 4 X 0.6 M M = 0.5M with fscr = 1 (evaluated at the center of =1.15 10 T − ⊙ ⊙ du × 3eff 0.7 µ M the star) and µeff = 0.6. For the GR values (α = 0)    eff    7 4 2 of the polytropic solutions Li depletes when the central 37 21 ξ ( θ (ξ )) Ω 16 2 u R ′ R 6 Sfscra u− e− 1 − . (41) temperature is Tc 2.98 10 K. A few other values × − 2u δ2 ≈ 2×   of the parameter α = κc βρc and their corresponding 5 central temperatures, ages, radii, and luminosities are discussed dependence when the lithium based method is given in the table (I). used. The obtained results clearly demonstrate that modi- Moreover, staying shorter (longer) in any evolutionary fied gravity (here Palatini quadratic model) significantly phase has a noticeable effect on the total stars’ luminos- changes the ages and luminosities of lithium depleted pre- ity which contributes to the galaxy brightness [53] since main sequence stars with respect to the GR model. De- the galaxy can have more (less) generations of stars with spite the fact that the values from the table (I) are given different luminosities than the ones predicted by the GR by the approximated expression (45), the deviations from model. the GR model with α = 0 in (43) are also expected to In addition, the results discussed in this work may occur. also provide a test for gravitational theories: prolonging prominently low-mass stars’ lifetimes in comparison to the current widely accepted model would raise doubts on IV. CONCLUSIONS a theory which introduces such effects. Further studies along these lines are currently underway. In this paper we have obtained the lithium-to-hydrogen ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ratio for the stellar model provided by the Palatini f( ) R gravity. Our main result is given by the equations (42), The work is supported by the Regional Development (43), and (45), where the last one’s solutions for a few Fund CoE program TK133 “The Dark Side of the Uni- values of the parameter α are presented in the table (I). verse.” All those relations contain terms depending on the so- 6 lution of (modified) Lane-Emden equation, introducing α Tc/10 K t [Myr] R/R⊙ L/L⊙ the dependence on gravitational model of interest. Such −2 a dependence will appear in theories of gravity which -0.4 3.48 3.21 1.85 25.3×10 modify the Newtonian limit of the relativistic hydrostatic -0.1 3.18 7.48 1.28 14.4×10−2 equilibrium equation (that is, the Tolman-Oppenheimer- × −2 Volkoff equation). -0.001 3.129 7.76 1.19 14.1 10 Although it seems to be worrying that the lithium de- 0 (GR) 2.98 12.42 1.03 10.3×10−2 pletion based techniques for the age estimation depend 0.001 3.128 7.78 1.19 14×10−2 on the applied model of gravity, it also gives room for −2 gravitational theories whose modifications shorten any 0.1 3.098 7.25 1.13 14.7×10 phase of the stellar evolution, as provided by the consid- 0.4 3.093 3.57 1.06 23.6×10−2 ered Palatini quadratic model. The discovery of a 0.2M ⊙ white dwarf in the binary system KIC 8145411 [49] which Table I. Numerical values of central temperatures (in 106K), according to the commonly accepted model would have to age (in Myr), radius (in R⊙), and luminosity (in L⊙) of fully 2 be older than the Universe [50], is a clear example of the convective low-mass stars with respect to α = κc βρc at the 7 need of different evolutionary scenarios (for a brief discus- time of Li depletion. The star’s mass, effective temperature, sion on that topic, see [51]). It was shown [52] that white hydrogen mass fraction, and mean molecular weight are M = dwarfs are also found in young clusters whose progenitor 0.5M⊙, Teff = 3500K, X = 0.7, and µeff = 0.6, respectively. stars’ masses depend crucially on the assumed age of the cluster, which is another argument for being aware of the

[1] E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. [7] J. M. M. Senovilla and D. Garfinkle, Class. Quant. Grav. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753. 32 (2015) 124008. [2] S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. [8] L. Parker and D. J. Toms, “Quantum Field Theory in Phys. 4 (2007) 115. Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Gravity” (Cam- [3] S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou, Modified bridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009). Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and [9] N. D. Birrel and P. C. W. Davies, “Quantum Fields in Late-time Evolution, Physics Reports 692 (2017). Curved Space” (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, [4] S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in mod- England, 1982). ified gravity: from F (R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant [10] M. Linares, T. Shahbaz, and J. Casares, The Astrophys- models, Physics Reports 505 (2011). ical Journal 859 (2018) 54. [5] S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 [11] J. Antoniadis et al., Science 340 (2012) 6131. (2008) 357. [12] F. Crawford, M. S. E. Roberts, J. W. T. Hessels, S. M. [6] S. M. Carroll, A. De Felice, V. Duvvuri, D. A. Easson, Ransom, M. Livingstone, C. R. Tam and V. M. Kaspi, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) Astrophys. J. 652 (2006) 1499. 063513. [13] R. Abbott et al, The Astrophysical Journal 896 L44 6

(2020). Wiley and Sons (1972). [14] R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and [33] Toniato, J.D.; Rodrigues, D.C.; Wojnar, A., Phys. Rev. Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101102 D 2020, 101, 064050. (2020). [34] P. K. Schwartz and D. Giulini, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052116 [15] J. Sakstein, et al., arXiv:2009.01213. (2019). [16] J. Sakstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 201101. [35] G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D 77, 084021 (2008). [17] J. Sakstein, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 124045. [36] G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. Letters 98, 061101 (2007). [18] M. Crisostomi, M. Lewandowski and F. Vernizzi, Phys. [37] A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) Rev. D 100 no.2, 024025 (2019). 3. [19] G.J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, A. Wojnar, Phys. Rev. D [38] A. Stachowski, M. Szydlowski, A. Borowiec, Eur. Phys. 100.4 (2019), 044020. J. C77, 406 (2017). [20] M. Benito, A. Wojnar, arXiv:2101.02146. [39] M. Szydlowski, A. Stachowski, A. Borowiec, Eur. Phys. [21] A. Wojnar, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 124045. J. C77, 603 (2017). [22] R. Rebolo, E.L. Martin, A. Magazzu, The Astrophysical [40] V.I. Afonso, G.J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, Phys.Rev.D Journal 389 (1992): L83-L86. 97 (2018) 2, 021503. [23] L.A. Nelson, S. Rappaport, E. Chiang, The Astrophysical [41] V.I. Afonso, G.J. Olmo, E. Orazi, D. Rubiera-Garcia, Journal 413 (1993): 364-367. Eur.Phys.J.C 78 (2018) 10, 866. [24] G. Bastri, The Lithium Test for Young Brown Dwarfs [42] V.I. Afonso, G.J. Olmo, E. Orazi, D. Rubiera-Garcia, (invited review). In: Brown dwarfs and extrasolar plan- Phys.Rev.D 99 (2019) 4, 044040. ets. 1998. p. 394. [43] A. Wojnar, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) no.5, 421. [25] G. Basri, G.W. Marcy, J.R. Graham, The Astrophysical [44] A. Wojnar, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) no.1, 51. Journal 458 (1996): 600. [45] A. Sergyeyev, A. Wojnar, Eur.Phys.J.C 80 (2020) 4, 313. [26] G. Chabrier. I. Baraffe, The Astrophysical Journal, 459: [46] A. Wojnar, Acta Phys.Polon.Supp. 13 (2020) 249. L91-L94 (1996). [47] G.R. Caughlan, W. A. Fowler, At. Data Nucl. Data Ta- [27] L. Bildsten, et al., The Astrophysical Journal 482.1 bles, 40, 283 (1998). (1997): 442. [48] G. Raimann, Z. Phys. A Hadrons and Nuclei 347.1 [28] G. Ushomirsky et al., The Astrophysical Journal 497.1 (1993): 73-74. (1998): 253. [49] K. Masuda, H. Kawahara, D.W. Latham, A. Bieryla, M. [29] D.R. Soderblom, et al. Ages of young stars Protostars Kunitomo, M. MacLeod, W. Aoki, AJ, Let., Vol. 881, and Planets VI 3.1 (2014). No.1 (2019). [30] A. Burrows and J. Liebert, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 (1993) [50] G. Laughlin, P. Bodenheimer, F.C. Adams, AJ, 482, 420- 301. 432 (1997). [31] G.J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Gracia, A. Wojnar, Stellar struc- [51] A. Wojnar, arXiv:2012.13927. ture models in modified theories of gravity: lessons and [52] I.N. Reid, The Astrophysical Journal 111, p. 2000 (1996). challenges, Physics Reports 876 (2020). [53] A.C Davis et al, Physical Review D 85.12 (2012): 123006. [32] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John