The Treatment of Parodies under Copyright Law in Seven Jurisdictions A Comparative Review of the Underlying Principles Parody and Pastiche. Study II. January 2013 Dinusha Mendis and Martin Kretschmer This is an independent report commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office © Crown copyright 2013 2013/23 Dr. Dinusha Mendis is Senior Lecturer in Law, and Co-Director of the ISBN: 978-1-908908-49-0 Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management (www.cippm.org. The Treatment of Parodies under Copyright Law in Seven Jurisdictions: A Comparative Review of the uk), Bournemouth University. E-mail:
[email protected] Underlying Principles Published by The Intellectual Property Office Martin Kretschmer is Professor of Intellectual Property Law, and 8th January 2013 Director of CREATe, the RCUK Centre for Copyright & New Business Models (www.create.ac.uk), University of Glasgow. E-mail: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
[email protected] © Crown Copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) This is the second in a sequence of three reports on Parody & Pastiche, free of charge in any format or medium, under the commissioned to evaluate policy options in the implementation of the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property & Growth (2011). Study I this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov. uk/doc/open-government-licence/ presents new empirical data about music video parodies on the online or email:
[email protected] platform YouTube; Study II offers a comparative legal review of the law of parody in seven jurisdictions; Study III provides a summary of the Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from findings of Studies I & II, and analyses their relevance for copyright the copyright holders concerned.