DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY Accattatis, V. (2005). La rule of law europea e Silvio Berlusconi. Il ponte, 61(4), 50–56. Adamishin, A. (2012). La Russia e l’Europa. Rivista Di Studi Politici Internazionali, 79(3 (315)), nuova serie, 397–407. Agnew, J. (1995). The Rhetoric of Regionalism: The Northern League in Italian Politics, 1983–94. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20(2), 156–172. Albertazzi, D. (2013). “Amici fragili”: The Alliance Between the Lega Nord and the Popolo della Libertà as Seen by Their Representatives and Members. Modern Italy, 18(1), 1–18. Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2008). Introduction: The Sceptre and the Spectre. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy (pp. 1–11). London: Palgrave. Albertazzi, D., & McDonnel, D. (2015). Populists in Power. Abingdon: Routledge. Alegi, G., Mueller, K., Anrig, C., Chivvis, C., Egnell, R., Goulter, C., et al. (Eds.). (2015). Precision and Purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War (pp. 205–238). RAND Corporation. Alessandri, E. (2009). Italian Foreign Policy and the Obama Administration: Between New Opportunities and Constraints. Italian Politics, 25, 149–167. Aliboni, R. (2003). Neo‐Nationalism and Neo‐Atlanticism in Italian Foreign Policy. The International Spectator, 38(1), 81–90. Aliboni, R., & Greco, E. (1996). Foreign Policy Re-nationalization and Internationalism in the Italian Debate. International Affairs, 72(1), 43–51. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), 195 under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 E. Diodato and F. Niglia, Berlusconi ‘The Diplomat’, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97262-6 196 BIBLIOGRAPHY Allegretti, U. (2005). Dal ‘sistema Berlusconi’ a un’altra Italia. Democrazia e diritto, 43(1), 9–17. Alter, K. J. (2017, November 8). The Future of International Law in an Age of Trump. How Stable is the Post-WWII International Order? The Berlin Journal, at https://goo.gl/MkAxN1. Altwaiji, M. (2014). Neo-orientalism and the Neo-imperialism Thesis: Post-9/11 US and Arab World Relationship. Arab Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 313–323. Amadori, A. (2002). Mi consenta. Metafore, messaggi, simboli. Come Silvio Berlusconi ha conquistato il consenso elettorale. Milano: Libri Scheiwiller. Amato, G. (2014). The New Italian Miracle: Disaffection and Political Upheaval in Italy. Harvard International Review, 35(3), 75–79. Amyot, G., & Marangoni, F. (2005). Mortal Risks? The Problem of Italy’s International Competitiveness. Italian Politics, 21, 220–232. Anderson, P. (2014). The Italian Disaster. London Review of Books, 36(10), 3–16. Andreatta, F. (2008). Italian Foreign Policy: Domestic Politics, International Requirements and the European Dimension. Journal of European Integration, 30(1), 169–181. Andreatta, F., & Brighi, E. (2003). The Berlusconi Government’s Foreign Policy: The First 18 Months. In J. Blondel & P. Segatti (Eds.), Italian Politics: The Second Berlusconi Government (pp. 221–236). New York: Berghahn. Andreatta, F., Brighi, E., & Forcella, I. (2002). The Berlusconi Government’s Foreign Policy: The First 18 Months. Italian Politics, 18, 221–236. Andreotti, G. (1994). Foreign Policy in the Italian Democracy. Political Science Quarterly (Academy of Political Science), 109(3), 529. Are, G. (1977). L’Italia e i mutamenti internazionali 1971/1976. L’arretramento di un paese diviso in un mondo in trasformazione. Firenze: Vallecchi. Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective. Political Studies, 64(1S), 88–104. Atti Parlamentari della Camera dei Deputati. (1992). XI legislatura. Rome. Atti parlamentari, Camera dei Deputati. (2001). XVI legislatura, 16 giugno 2001, at https://goo.gl/ngZhc5. Bagnato, B. (2003). Prove di Ostpolitik: politica ed economia nella strategia ital- iana verso l’Unione Sovietica: 1958–1963. Firenze: L.S. Olschki. Baldi, S. & Nesi, G. (Eds.). (2017). Diplomatici in azione. Aspetti giuridici e politici della prassi diplomatica nel mondo contemporaneo. Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento. Balfour, R., et al. (2016). Europe’s Troublemakers. The Populist Challenge to Foreign Policy. Brussels: European Policy Center, at https://goo.gl/hixNts. Balkan. (2007). La strategia italiana per i Balcani: nuovi strumenti per nuovi sce- nari. Rivista Di Studi Politici Internazionali, 74(4), 497–504. Barone, G., D’Acunto, F., & Narciso, G. (2015). Telecracy: Testing for Channels of Persuasion. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(2), 30–60. BIBLIOGRAPHY 197 Bayne, N. (2001). The Italian Presidency of the G8 Summit. Italian Politics, 17, 167–184. BBC News. (2003, July 3). Berlusconi jibe Sparks EU Storm, at https://goo.gl/ tQFyb5. BBC News. (2007, February 10). Obama Launches Presidential Bid, at https:// goo.gl/an55dx. Bechis, F. (2018, January 2). L’euro di Prodi ha reso peggiore l’Italia. Corriere dell’Umbria. Bellandi, M. (2011). Il Consiglio supremo di difesa. Storia, organizzazione, attiv- ità. Bologna: Il Mulino. Bellandi, R., & Bull, D. (2013). Who Decides Foreign and Defense Policy in Italy? Italian Politics, 29, 196–215. Belloni, R., & della Rocca, R. M. (2008). Italy and the Balkans: The Rise of a Reluctant Middle Power. Modern Italy, 13(2), 169–185. Bellucci, P., & Evans, J. (1997). Italian Intervention in Bosnia and the (Slow) Redefnition of Defense Policy. Italian Politics, 12, 199–218. Belpoliti, M. (2009). Il corpo del capo. Parma-Milano: Guanda. Benvenuti, A. (2017). Between Myth and Reality: The Euro Crisis and the Downfall of Silvio Berlusconi. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 22(4), 512–529. Berlin, I., et al. (1968). To Defne Populism. Government and Opposition, 3(2), 173–178. Berlusconi, S. (2000). L’Italia che ho in mente. I discorsi “a braccio” di Silvio Berlusconi. Milano: Mondadori. Berlusconi, S. (2001). Discorsi per la democrazia. Milano: Mondadori. Berlusconi, S. (2002a). Il nuovo ruolo dell’Italia nel mondo, Intervento al Rimini Meeting, Venerdì, 23 agosto 2002, ore 17.00. Relatore: Silvio Berlusconi, Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri. Moderatore: Roberto Formigoni, Presidente della Regione Lombardia, at https://goo.gl/jDFUSf. Berlusconi, S. (2002b). Intervento del Presidente del Consiglio Silvio Berlusconi alla Camera e annuncio delle dimissioni del Ministro degli Affari Esteri e del conferimento ad interim del medesimo incarico al Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri, in Ministero degli Affari Esteri La politica estera dell’Italia. Testi e documenti 2002. Roma: Servizio storico, archivi e documentazione. Berlusconi, S. (2004). Intervento del Presidente del Consiglio Silvio Berlusconi in occasione della cerimonia di frma “Una Costituzione per l’Europa” (Roma, 29 ottobre 2004), Bruxelles, European Union, at https://goo.gl/b15cCe. Berlusconi, S. (2006). Verso il partito della libertà: L’identità, i valori, il progetto. Milano: Mondadori. Bernardini, M. (2004). Berlusconi e il ‘Russiann harassment’. MicroMega, 2, 46–54. Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 679–682. 198 BIBLIOGRAPHY Betz, H.-G. (1994). Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Bickerton, C. J., & Accetti, C. I. (2018). ‘Techno-populism’ as a new party fam- ily: the case of the Five Star Movement and Podemos. Contemporary Italian Politics, 10(2), 132–150. Biorcio, R. (2015). Il populismo nella politica italiana. Da Bossi a Berlusconi, da Grillo a Renzi. Milano: Mimesis. Bistarelli, A. (2006). La casa delle libertà storiografche. Passato E Presente: Rivista Di Storia Contemporanea, 24(68), 5–12. Blondel, J., Segatti, P., & Barr, P. (2002). Introduction: The Second Berlusconi Government. Italian Politics, 18, 19–35. Bobba, G., & McDonnell, D. (2016). Different Types of Right-Wing Populist Discourse in Government and Opposition: The Case of Italy. South European Society and Politics, 21(3), 281–299. Bolasco, S., Galli de’ Paratesi, N., & Giuliano, L. (2006). Parole in libertà. Un’analisi statistica e linguistica dei discorsi di Berlusconi. Roma: Manifestolibri. Bordignon, F. (2014). Matteo Renzi: A ‘Leftist Berlusconi’ for the Italian Democratic Party? South European Society & Politics, 19(1), 1–23. Botti, A. (2013). Per una storia del berlusconismo e dell’Italia berlusconiana oltre Berlusconi. Storia e problemi contemporanei, 26, 13–34. Brighi, E. (2006). ‘One Man Alone’? A Longue Durée Approach to Italy’s Foreign Policy Under Berlusconi. Government and Opposition, 41(2), 278–297. Brighi, E. (2007). How to Change Your Foreign Policy in 100 Days: A New Course with the Prodi Government? The International Spectator, 42(1), 129–140. Brighi, E. (2011). Resisting Europe? The Case of Italy’s Foreign Policy. In R. Wong & C. Hill (Eds.), National European Foreign Policies. Toward Europeanization (pp. 57–71). London: Routledge. Brighi, E. (2013). Foreign Policy, Domestic Politics and International Relations. The Case of Italy. London: Routledge. Briquet, J., Mastropaolo, A., & McDonnell, D. (2006). Introduction: The Center-Left’s Poisoned Victory. Italian Politics, 22, 37–58. Brogi, A. (2006). “Competing Missions”: France, Italy, and the Rise of American Hegemony in the Mediterranean. Diplomatic History, 30(4), 741–770. Brunkhorst, H. (2011). Solidarität in der Krise: Ist Europa am Ende? Leviathan, 39(4), 459–477. Bugamelli, M., Cipollone, P., & Infante, L. (2000). L’internazionalizzazione delle imprese italiane negli anni Novanta. Rivista italiana degli economisti, 5(3), 349–386. Burigana, D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party Respond to the Crisis1
    All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis1 Luke March University of Edinburgh [email protected] Paper for PSA 2013 Draft version 1.0. Work very much in progress. Please do not quote without author’s permission. Why has the left failed to benefit from the post-2008 economic crisis? This is a common, but perhaps slightly unfair question. It is difficult to see any one political family as a unique beneficiary, and indeed the right’s apparent earlier ideological hegemony has become unstuck with the ‘austerity medicine’ having consistently failed to revive the European patient. Nevertheless, there is still something remarkable about socio-economic conditions that should be a ‘perfect storm’ for left-wing politics regularly failing to produce anything like a clear boon for the left. The February 2013 Italian elections are just the latest that may mark a ‘no- confidence’ vote in the Centre-Left (McDonnell and Bobba 2013). The social democratic Democratic Party (PD) and its more leftist ally, the post-communist Left Ecology Freedom threw away an apparently unassailable lead to squeak ahead of the right and Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement. This paper aims to contribute to answering this overarching question by comparing the policy and ideological response to the crisis undertaken by the three ‘left’ transnational party federations (TNPs) at European level, the Party of European Socialists (PES), European Green Party (EGP) and European Left Party (EL).2 Comparing the three TNPs is an apposite approach. Although TNPs are ‘timidly rising actors’, relatively weak formations that fall far short of being fully integrated parties, they at the very least aspire to a minimal level of ideological and policy co-ordination (Bardi 2004; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy and Possible Implications for Eurozone Stability
    ITALY IMPLICATIONS Italy and possible implications for eurozone stability After Italy’s unsuccessful push for reform at the EU Summit last month, many of its European partners may be tempted to write-off the country’s concerns. However, this somewhat complacent stance may be dangerous in that it underestimates the recent shift in Italian political dynamics that culminated in the formation of an unexpected coalition government and the extent to which this may impact financial markets and potentially EU stability. Erik Jones Abstract: Italy’s recent election surprised many are not natural political allies. While there are observers who expected a hung parliament areas of policy overlap, the diverse nature of and who were subsequently caught off guard the M5S’s political movement, its relatively by the success of the right-wing Lega and the more expensive policy agenda, and Lega’s populist Five Star Movement (M5S). This growing strength all suggest maintaining a outcome can be attributed to an increasingly united front may prove difficult. Nevertheless, volatile Italian electorate and a shift in political this unexpected political partnership ought dynamics brought about by the economic and not to be written-off by European partners. financial crisis. As the protracted coalition Finding ways to interact with Italy’s new negotiations demonstrated, the Lega and M5S government poses a considerable challenge 81 to EU leaders and, subsequently, the outlook Conte’s success with this complex agenda for EU macroeconomic governance reforms was not obvious. Moreover, there is nothing and financial markets’ stability. However, surprising in this lack of accomplishment. such efforts will be necessary to stabilize the Few heads of state or government achieve all eurozone and contain anti-EU sentiment.
    [Show full text]
  • An Uncertain Italy
    Geographical Overview | EU’s Mediterranean Countries Panorama An Uncertain Italy Marc Lazar has submitted his resignation in the wake of this dis- Professor of History and Political Sociology at aster. In fact, the PD’s defeat is yet another example Sciences Po, Paris of the deep crisis of the entire continental European President, School of Government, Libera Università left. For its part, Silvio Berlusconi’s Forza Italia, with Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (LUISS), 14% of the votes, has obtained its lowest election Rome results since it was founded in 1994. Il Cavaliere, at 81 years of age, no longer mobilizes anyone but his most diehard followers and no longer aggregates an The results of the 4 March 2018 Italian elections are arc of broader forces behind him ranging from the paradoxical. On the one hand, they clearly show extreme right to the centre. He has thus been great- Geographical Overview Mediterranean | EU’s Countries three winners and three losers. On the other hand, ly weakened by the results of this election. The ex- they have made Italy enter a stage of extreme politi- haustion of his party, which exists nearly exclusively cal uncertainty. for and by him, attests to a more generalized phe- The losers are, first and foremost, the two main po- nomenon, that of the difficulties of the European 192 litical parties that had been attempting to impose right, as can be seen, for instance, in France, Ger- their hegemony for years on their respective ends of many, Austria and Spain. In Italy, as elsewhere, the the political spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Populism Worldwide Faculty Research Working Paper Series
    Measuring Populism Worldwide Faculty Research Working Paper Series Pippa Norris Harvard Kennedy School February 2020 RWP20-002 Visit the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series at: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/research-insights/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_types%3A121 The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu Measuring Populism Worldwide: Norris 1/8/20 8:50 PM Measuring Populism Worldwide Pippa Norris McGuire Lecturer in Comparative Politics John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] www.pippanorris.com @PippaN15 www.GlobalPartySurvey.org Data: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/GlobalPartySurvey. Synopsis: Populism studies have rapidly burgeoned but nevertheless systematic cross-national evidence about this phenomenon has lagged far behind. How can populism be measured in ways which are consistent, valid, and reliable? To address this issue, Part I outlines the minimalist concept of populism used in the study. Part II summarizes the pros and cons of previous attempts at gauging and classifying party ideological values and issue positions in general, as well as recent studies seeking to classify populists as a distinct party family. Part III describes the research design employed to construct the Global Party Survey, replicating the methods of previous expert surveys but expanding coverage worldwide and including innovative measures of populist rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Five Star Movement Deviate from Its 'Democratic Formula'?
    Innovative Politics: Does The Five Star Movement Deviate from its ‘Democratic Formula’? Anna Grazia Napoletano S4609301 16 November 2017 Comparative Politics Master thesis Supervisor: Dr. Maurits J. Meijers Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University Nijmegen Word count. 33, 759 Table of Contents 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………. 3 1.1 Innovative politics: from a minimalist concept of democracy to a complex one……….. 8 1.2 Innovative politics: Pirate Party, Geenpeil and the Five Star Movement……………….. 12 2.The Five Star Movement: History and organization……………………………………... 15 2.1 Italian political context:……………………………………………………………… 15 2.2 From a website to a Movement: The Five Star Movement’s embryo stage………….. 18 2.2.1 Anti-media………………………………………………………………………….. 19 2.2.2 Meetup……………………………………………………………………………… 21 2.3 From a Movement to a party…………………………………………………………. 24 2.3.1 Current structure……………………………………………………………………… 27 2.3.2 The Five Star Movement manifesto and its system of checks and balances…………. 28 2.3.3 Staff…………………………………………………………………………………… 30 2.3.4 Financing……………………………………………………………………………… 30 3. Divergence from the Five Star Movement’s Democratic Formula………………………. 31 3.1 The FiveStar Movement democratic formula: direct-participatory, transparent and deliberative………………………………………………………………….. 31 3.2 Direct and Participatory Democracy……………………………………………………. 32 3.3 Transparent Democracy…………………………………………………………………. 35 3.4 Deliberative Democracy………………………………………………………………… 35 3.5 Deviations from the Five Star Movement’s democratic formula……………………….. 36 3.6 Expectations regarding the Five Star Movement’s divergence from its “democratic formula”……………………………………………………………………………………… 38 3.6.1 The massive organization of internal democracy and “the Iron Law of Oligarchy”….… 38 3.6.2.The Lack of ideology: Delegation Vs. Representation and Taggart’s protest politics….. 41 4. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………… 46 4.1 Exploring the world of the Five Star Movement………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Populism in Italy
    CICERO FOUNDATION GREAT DEBATE PAPER No. 19/05 December 2019 POPULISM IN ITALY EXPLORING THE IDEOLOGICAL ROOTS OF LEGA AND THE FIVE STAR MOVEMENT DR. LUCA MANUCCI University of Lisbon Institute of Social Sciences Cicero Foundation Great Debate Paper No. 19/05 © Luca Manucci, 2019. All rights reserved The Cicero Foundation is an independent pro-Atlantic and pro-EU think tank, founded in 1992 in Maastricht at the signing of the Maastricht Treaty. www.cicerofoundation.org The views expressed in Cicero Foundation Great Debate Papers do not necessarily express the opinion of the Cicero Foundation, but they are considered interesting and thought-provoking enough to be published. Permission to make digital or hard copies of any information contained in these web publications is granted for personal use, without fee and without formal request. Full citation and copyright notice must appear on the first page. Copies may not be made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage. 2 Populism in Italy Exploring the Ideological Roots of Lega and the Five Star Movement Luca Manucci The League (Lega) and Five Star Movement (M5S) are quite different from an ideological point of view, but something ties them together: their populist vision of society. The League is now a classic far right party fighting immigration, the ‘cultural hegemony’ of the Left, and the economic ‘dictatorship’ of the European institutions, while claiming to defend the Christian roots of Europe. M5S is a very different type of party, since it lacks a clear ideology and scholars struggle to position it on a classic left-right divide.
    [Show full text]
  • New Party Organizations and Intra-Party Democracy: a Comparative Analysis of the Five Star Movement and Podemos
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations Track: Comparative Politics New Party Organizations and Intra-party Democracy: A Comparative Analysis of the Five Star Movement and Podemos PhD dissertation BY Bálint Mikola SUPERVISOR: Zsolt Enyedi CEU eTD Collection BUDAPEST, HUNGARY Date of submission: November 24, 2018 Word count: 84,744 words Table of contents Chapter 1 – Theoretical introduction........................................................................................................ 8 1. Literature review – Members’ role across party models ..................................................................... 10 2. Participation in new political parties ................................................................................................... 13 2.1 The diversification of party affiliation .......................................................................................... 14 2.2 Online participation....................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Intra-party democracy ................................................................................................................... 16 3. Indicators............................................................................................................................................. 18 4. Causal model and hypotheses ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beppe Grillo's 'Five Star'
    democraticaudit.com http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=4313 Beppe Grillo’s ‘Five Star’ movement shows the probable limitations of the internet as a replacement for politics By Democratic Audit In a recent post, the RSA’s Adam Lent argued that politics could learn from the internet in order to stem the tide of political apathy and disengagement. But can (and perhaps more importantly, should) politics actually be more like the internet? Democratic Audit’s co-Director Jonathan Hopkin argues that events in Italy show that it is much too soon to draw conclusions from their unique web-based experience, but it does suggest that the internet is far from a panacea. The Comedian/Politician Beppe Grillo, Credit: 20centisimi, CC BY 2.0 Adam Lent’s post on politics and the internet puts forward an intriguing and provocative interpretation of political alienation in British politics. Lent argues that political disengagement is the result of politics following a fundamentally hierarchical pattern of intermediation between citizens and government, where the political agenda is controlled by elected career politicians with little popular input. This type of politics may chime with the life experiences of older voters, but younger generations of citizens prefer the ‘disintermediation’ made possible by the internet, which can ‘create platforms where users can choose from a vast pool of options to shape what gets read, bought and funded’. Not surprisingly, the stultifying climate of Westminster politics, with its career politicians and intense focus on the established media, is desperately unappealing to younger citizens. This analysis certainly fits the observed facts of British political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy Election : How Populist Five Star Movement Is Wrecking Government Hopes for the Mainstream Bull, MJ
    Italy election : how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream Bull, MJ Title Italy election : how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream Authors Bull, MJ Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/46772/ Published Date 2018 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. 12/5/2019 Italy election: how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream Academic rigour, journalistic flair Di Meo/EPA Italy election: how populist Five Star Movement is wrecking government hopes for the mainstream February 23, 2018 1.28pm GMT Italy faces an election on March 4 – and, after a long decade of austerity and Author economic difficulties, a strong possibility of further political paralysis. Neither the centre-left, the centre-right, or the populists are likely to command a majority in parliament. Establishing a functioning government won’t be easy, and its make-up will depend on which parties are prepared to put aside their differences and form an Martin J. Bull alliance. Professor of Politics, University of Salford The populist Five Star Movement (M5S) exploded onto the electoral scene in the 2013 general election, arresting the see-saw alternation between centre-left and centre-right majority governments that had been tentatively established in the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Globalisation: a Comparative Analysis of the New Radical Centre in France, Italy and Spain
    Department of Political Science Chair: Political Science The Politics of Globalisation: A Comparative Analysis of the New Radical Centre in France, Italy and Spain SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Prof. Lorenzo De Sio Giuliano Festa Student Reg. No. 078422 ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE – MACRON, RENZI, RIVERA: THE REVENGE OF THIRD WAY POLITICS? ................... 3 1.1 BEYOND LEFT AND RIGHT? ................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 The legacy of Tony Blair ....................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 A new triumvirate ................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 “What Emmanuel Macron grasped” ................................................................................... 5 1.2 EMMANUEL MACRON: TALE OF AN UNPRECEDENTED ELECTION ................................................................. 5 1.2.1 The candidature ................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 The road to success .............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.3 The glorious verdicts ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Star Movement and Its Discontents
    Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 5 (2): 178 – 212 (November 2013) Turner, 5 Star Movement and its discontents The 5 Star Movement and its discontents: A tale of blogging, comedy, electoral success and tensions Eric Turner Abstract This paper seeks to provide English speaking readers with a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the rise to prominence of Beppe Grillo's 5 Star Movement (Movimento 5 Stelle). This movement recently captured a quarter of the popular vote in the February 2013 general elections in Italy but, in spite of extensive me- dia coverage, it has received little coverage in English speaking academia. This paper seeks to fill this gap, first by providing an overview of the movement through recording its (brief) history, then by comparing this case to similar cases of comedians-turned-politicians, media figures as social movement leaders and populism in Italy. Subsequently, this paper analyzes the reasons for this move- ment's success, as well as discussing the merit of the different labels that it has been given, including populism and personalism, and attempts to classify this movement on a left-right spectrum. Through these different lenses, this paper seeks to provide the English-speaking audience with an in depth analysis of the main characteristics of this movement and its main actors and activists' motiva- tions. Introduction Few political movements in recent years have shaken the world around them so quickly and so heavily as Beppe Grillo's 5 Star Movement. It was formed in 2009, and, after a few mildly successful early forays in the electoral arena, its popularity rapidly rose in 2012 and, building on several successes in local elections that same year, it took Italian politics by storm by obtaining 25% of the popular vote in the February 2013 Parliamentary elections (Ministero dell'Interno, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Italy: Scenario and Political Risks
    in collaboration with Luiss Luiss School of European Luiss CISE School of Government Political Economy Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali Mapping Italy: scenario and political risks No. 6 October 2020 Monthly Report on Italy Table of contents 1. Scenario and risks 4 1.1. Politics 4 1.2. Scenario 5 1.3. Forecasts 7 1.4. Mapping risks 8 2. Polls 9 3. Economic Scenario 12 No. 6 October 2020 2 of 14 Monthly Report on Italy Italian politics has always been an arcane subject. A handful of specialists and enthusiasts love to talk of its Machiavellian intricacies for hours on end, but most people, especially north of the Alps, not only do not understand it, but see no reason why they should bother to understand it. Today there are at least three reasons why they should. First, in Italy the crisis of the political establishment that is now evident in many advanced democracies began a quarter century ago. This means that the country is further down the road of the democratic malaise – it is a laboratory and a bellwether. Second, Italy is the first country from within the historical core of the European community to be governed by anti-establishment parties. Third, its politics represent the greatest threat to the stability, or possibly even the existence, of the common European currency. Founded in 2010 in a University that has a very strong international vocation, the Luiss School of Government aims to facilitate the connection between Italy and the world outside of it. It aims to prepare the future Italian public elite for the complexities of an ever more integrated planet, and to provide first-class education to non-Italian students in Italy’s capital city.
    [Show full text]