WW Summer 2018 FINAL
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Decision Document
Environment Agency permitting decisions Bespoke permit We have decided to grant the permit for Clearwell Farm operated by Mr Jonathan Hay. The permit number is EPR/WP3034VF This was applied for and determined as a new bespoke application. The application was duly made on 08/08/2014. We consider in reaching that decision we have taken into account all relevant considerations and legal requirements and that the permit will ensure that the appropriate level of environmental protection is provided. Purpose of this document This decision document: • explains how the application has been determined • provides a record of the decision-making process • shows how all relevant factors have been taken into account • justifies the specific conditions in the permit other than those in our generic permit template. Unless the decision document specifies otherwise we have accepted the applicant’s proposals. Structure of this document • Key issues: Ammonia Emissions; Industrial Emissions Directive (IED); Groundwater/Soil Monitoring; Odour management • Annex 1 the decision checklist • Annex 2 the consultation and web publicising responses EPR/WP3034VF/A001 Issued 06/11/14 Page 1 of 13 Key issues of the decision Ammonia Emissions There are four European designated sites located within ten kilometres, sixteen Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) located within five kilometres, seven Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) and ten Ancient Woodlands (AW) located within two kilometres of the installation. Ammonia Assessment – SAC / SPA / Ramsar sites The following trigger thresholds have been applied for assessment of European sites including Ramsar sites: • if the process contribution (PC) is below 4% of the relevant critical level (CLe) or critical load (CLo) then the farm can be permitted with no further assessment; • where this threshold is exceeded an assessment alone and in combination is required; • an overlapping in combination assessment will be completed where existing farms are identified within 10 km of the habitat site. -
THE FOREST of DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-Based Data Collection Project Number 2727
THE FOREST OF DEAN GLOUCESTERSHIRE Archaeological Survey Stage 1: Desk-based data collection Project Number 2727 Volume 2 Appendices Jon Hoyle Gloucestershire County Council Environment Department Archaeology Service November 2008 © Archaeology Service, Gloucestershire County Council, November 2008 1 Contents Appendix A Amalgamated solid geology types 11 Appendix B Forest Enterprise historic environment management categories 13 B.i Management Categories 13 B.ii Types of monument to be assigned to each category 16 B.iii Areas where more than one management category can apply 17 Appendix C Sources systematically consulted 19 C.i Journals and periodicals and gazetteers 19 C.ii Books, documents and articles 20 C.iii Map sources 22 C.iv Sources not consulted, or not systematically searched 25 Appendix D Specifications for data collection from selected source works 29 D.i 19th Century Parish maps: 29 D.ii SMR checking by Parish 29 D.iii New data gathering by Parish 29 D.iv Types of data to be taken from Parish maps 29 D.v 1608 map of the western part of the Forest of Dean: Source Works 1 & 2919 35 D.vi Other early maps sources 35 D.vii The Victoria History of the County of Gloucester: Source Works 3710 and 894 36 D.viii Listed buildings information: 40 D.ix NMR Long Listings: Source ;Work 4249 41 D.x Coleford – The History of a West Gloucestershire Town, Hart C, 1983, Source Work 824 41 D.xi Riverine Dean, Putley J, 1999: Source Work 5944 42 D.xii Other text-based sources 42 Appendix E Specifications for checking or adding certain types of -
Woodland Management in the Lower Wye Valley 4 Introduction
WOODLAND MANAGEMENT IN THE LOWER WYE VALLEY 4 INTRODUCTION 6 WOODLAND CHARACTERISTICS How much woodland Ancient woodland Ownership Types of semi-natural woodland Designations 12 ORIGINS AND PAST MANAGEMENT Outline of woodland history in the lower Wye Valley Wood pastures Coppices Broadleaved high forest Conifer plantations Recent restorations Secondary woodland Woodland composition Farmland trees 18 WOODLAND ARCHAEOLOGY Ancient earthworks Industrial relicts Tracks in woods Farming remains in woods Earthworks of tradtional woodland use and management Recreation Earthworks and natural features as information about woodland history 21 NATURAL FEATURES Mixed deciduous woodland Other habitats Geological and geomorphological features 24 FLORA AND FAUNA The two faces of Wye Valley woodlands: dense woodlands at Symonda Yat contrasted with scatt ered woodland around Capler Camp Habitats Ground vegetation and common plants Woodland plants Bryophytes, lichens and fungi Woodland fauna Special protection for species 31 TRENDS AND THREATS Deer Grey squirrels Wild boar Chemicals Climate change 36 MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND OPTIONS General policy Sustainability Key features of woodland management Specialised aspects New woodland Trees outside woodland Conclusion 42 NOTES, REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING 43 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND FURTHER INFORMATION 44 REFERENCE MAP Compiled by George Peterken • Design by Tony Eggar Published by (?) • © Wye Valley AONB 2007 2 3 over the last two hundred years. Whereas Gilpin because the social, economic, biological and policy INTRODUCTION and the other Wye tourists appreciated, like us, the context in which management choices are made dramatic ruins of Goodrich and Chepstow castles is constantly changing, detailed prescriptions can ‘The banks [of the lower Wye] for the most part rise abruptly from and the abbey at Tintern, they also revelled in only be temporary. -
A Strategy for the Identification of Contaminated Land Within Its Area
A Strategy for the Identification of Contaminated Land June 2001- Issue 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Under legislation introduced on 1st April, 2000, Stroud District Council was placed under a statutory duty to inspect its District to identify contaminated land. A formal strategy was to be published by July, 2001 which would detail how the Authority intended to undertake its inspection duties. This document is that strategy. The District Council is the lead Authority with regard to contaminated land but, wherever necessary, it undertakes to work in partnership with other organisations, particularly the Environment Agency. Detailed consultation regarding this strategy was undertaken with both statutory and non-statutory consultees up to April, 2001. Publication of this final version occurred on 30th June, 2001, in line with legislative requirements. The Council’s priorities in dealing with contaminated land will be: 1. To protect human health 2. To protect controlled waters 3. To protect specified ecosystems 4. To prevent damage to property In dealing with these priorities the Council also aims to prevent any further contamination of land, to encourage voluntary remediation of contaminated land and to encourage re-use of brownfield land. A five-year programme of inspection will be undertaken with a target date for completion of April, 2005. A prioritised inspection programme is proposed, with Priority Investigation Areas being inspected first, followed by other areas later in the programme. Among the Priority Investigation Areas identified are major population centres, the Five Valleys, controlled waters are land owned by the Council itself. It is recognised that the inspection programme will need to be extremely flexible as some sites may be identified that require urgent attention. -
Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
FREE Including Walks & Events Guide Cotswold Lion Issue 26 • Spring/Summer 2012 The newspaper of the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Festival at the castle Diamond Jubilee plans 10 top picnic Car-free Cotswolds Large Blues fly again page 3 take shape page 4 locations page 6 page 7 page 8 Cotswold Olimpicks celebrate 400 years London 2012? The modern Games all started with rustic sports at Chipping Campden! winning bid to stage London 2012, “We are often asked how serious this year marks the 400th anniversary of the inaugural Robert Dover’s we are about it all,” says Graham, Games that began “the historical who has been involved with the thread in Britain that was ultimately annual jamboree for some 25 to lead to the creation of the modern years. “We are very serious in Olympics.” as much as it’s historical fact To celebrate the historic that our Games were the first in anniversary the Cotswold Olimpicks, modern times to be referred to on Friday 1st June, will feature an extended programme of events with as Olimpicks, certainly by 1630.” an enhanced Jacobean flavour, plus a brand new castle to crown the lofty the training of the youth in manly plateau of National Trust-owned sports and for the harmless mirthe Dover’s Hill. Visitors can also expect Olimpick Tug of War and jollitie of the neighbourhood”. Nick Turner Nick more local food stalls, alongside the As chief director and manager, he familiar bands and cannon fire, rustic trotted about on a white horse, and “We get TV crews from Japan and racing, backswords, tug o’war and, a 1636 collection of celebratory Australia coming to film us shin- of course, the World Shin-kicking poems, Annalia Dubrensia, shows him kicking and they think we are Championships. -
Landscape Character Assessment: Gloucestershire and Forest of Dean
LANDSCAPE DESIGN ASSOCIATES Landscape Character Assessment: Gloucestershire and Forest of Dean Forest of Dean District LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT FINAL DRAFT REPORT APPENDICES November 2002 Worton Rectory Park • Oxford • OX29 4SX • Tel : 01865 887050 • Fax : 01865 887055 • Email : [email protected] APPENDIX 1 Data Sets Used in the Character Assessment 1586LO/IH/SG/ Forest of Dean District Landscape Character Assessment/November 2002 DATA SETS USED IN THE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT The table below details the key data sources used in the district landscape character assessment. (*) denotes a mapped data set that was available in a digital format that could be interrogated in GIS. A number of existing landscape character assessments and core documentation were also used in the assessment process. A full list of written sources is provided in the bibliography. Topic Data Set Data Source Baseline Mapping *Ordnance Survey 1:50,000 digital OS/ Gloucestershire County Council mapping (raster data) Geology *British Geological Survey data British Geological Survey/ (1:50,000) Gloucestershire County Council Landform *OS DTM Landform Panorama data OS/ Gloucestershire County Council Vegetation/ Land Cover *Land Cover Map 2000 CEH/ Gloucestershire County Council Woodlands *National Woodland Inventory Forestry Commission/ Gloucestershire County Council Nature Conservation *Natural Areas English Nature/ Countryside Agency *National Nature Reserves/ SSSI English Nature Landscape Character *Countryside Character Areas Countryside Agency *National Landscape -
The Wye Valley AONB
Wye Valley Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) DRAFT State of the AONB Report 2020 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Wye Valley AONB .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Priority Habitats analysis ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Wales Priority Habitat data ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Orchards ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Sensitive Habitats .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Priority Habitats in SSSIs ............................................................................................................................................... 5 AONB Network picture ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Farming statistics analysis (source MEOPL data) ......................................................................................................... -
South Cotswold Ramblers' Group
South Cotswold Ramblers’ Group Newsletter - June 2012 Published each year in February, June and October. We look forward to hearing from you with stories, opinions, photos, poetry, art, funny tales, cartoons, recipes, appeals, you name it. Please contact the Editor, Mike Garner, 01453 873625, email: [email protected] by 5 September 2012 Chairman’s Report Like a large number of you I joined Ramblers to walk. Others wanted to involve themselves in footpath work. Others are members because they support our charitable aims and objectives. But how many of us fully appreciate the work that has been done and continues to be done by our organisation? Are you concerned to know what happens to the money raised from your subscriptions? Were you aware that Ramblers is the Country’s leading walking charity and that without the dedication of its volunteers we would not have the magnificent network of well-documented and maintained footpaths, which we have today? There have been a number of events this year, which serve to bring home to us the essential work done by Ramblers, the first being the sad death of Tony Drake. There was much press coverage of his work for our footpaths for which he received the MBE. He was the main driving force behind the setting up of the Cambrian Way and was involved in other long Job Done - Locked gate replaced with one of our kissing gates distance paths in our area such as the Cotswold Way and the near Tiled House Farm, Standish. Wysis Way. He played an instrumental role in mapping local footpaths, pioneered a footpath waymarking scheme and Earlier in the year one of our programmed walks campaigned tirelessly for better access to the countryside. -
Risk Maps for Individual Host Species and Lists of Designated Sites at Risk
APPENDIX 2: RISK MAPS FOR INDIVIDUAL HOST SPECIES AND LISTS OF DESIGNATED SITES AT RISK. Figure 1 Risk posed to V. myrtillus under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 2 Figure 2 Risk posed to V. vitis-idaea under the three different risk scenarios. ....................... 3 Figure 3. Risk posed to C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 4 Figure 4 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 5 Figure 5 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ..................................................................................... 6 Figure 6 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 7 Figure 7 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ........................................................................................... 8 Figure 8 Risk posed to SACs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 9 Figure 9 Risk posed to SACs for species, V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ................................................................................... 10 Table 1 Lists of all SPAs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. ................................................... 11 Table 2 Lists of all SACs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. -
Highways Maintenance Handbook May 2003
Highways Maintenance Handbook May 2003 Gloucestershire County Council Highways Maintenance Handbook May 2003 Halcrow Group Limited Llanthony Warehouse The Docks Gloucester Gloucestershire GL1 2NS Tel +44 (0)1452 393908 Fax +44 (0)1452 393900 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Gloucestershire County Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Gloucestershire County Council 2003 If you have any comments on this handbook please contact: Robert Vale Senior Divisional Manager (East) Gloucestershire County Council Divisional Managers Office Station Road Bourton on the Water Gloucestershire GL54 2EP 01451 820441 email [email protected] Halcrow Group Limited Llanthony Warehouse The Docks Gloucester Gloucestershire GL1 2NS Tel +44 (0)1452 393908 Fax +44 (0)1452 393900 www.halcrow.com Gloucestershire County Council Highways Maintenance Handbook Contents 1 Introduction 10 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................10 1.2 Vision Statement ...................................................................................................10 1.3 Aims and Objectives .............................................................................................11 1.4 Publication, Adoption and Incorporation of Policy and Strategy ..........................13 2 Statutory Duties and other maintenance -
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence SSSI unit condition (ha) UNFAVOURABLE UNFAVOURABLE NO UNFAVOURABLE Percent SSSI held by SSSI name Whole SSSI area (ha) FAVOURABLE PART DESTROYED DESTROYED MoD area RECOVERING CHANGE DECLINING MoD ALKHAM, LYDDEN AND SWINGFIELD WOODS 228.33 99.1 7.5 106.6 46.69% APPLEBY FELLS 10,693.02 453.7 4,532.2 4,985.8 46.63% ASH TO BROOKWOOD HEATHS 1,576.12 482.4 830.8 94.4 1,407.6 89.31% ASHDOWN FOREST 3,209.28 92.0 201.1 293.1 9.13% BARNHAMCROSS COMMON 69.08 0.1 0.1 0.16% BARROW BURN MEADOWS 5.18 2.9 2.3 5.2 100.00% BARROW MEADOW 5.67 5.6 5.6 99.29% BASINGSTOKE CANAL 101.15 5.3 8.6 19.1 0.2 33.1 32.76% BENFLEET AND SOUTHEND MARSHES 2,373.69 98.6 98.6 4.15% BILLSMOOR PARK AND GRASSLEES WOOD 112.58 4.3 0.3 4.6 4.09% BIRKLANDS AND BILHAUGH 505.73 206.1 1.5 207.6 41.05% BIRKLANDS WEST AND OLLERTON CORNER 414.64 61.7 6.6 68.2 16.46% BLANDFORD CAMP 28.69 3.6 25.1 28.7 99.97% BOURLEY AND LONG VALLEY 823.90 7.1 783.1 32.1 822.3 99.80% BOWES MOOR 4,489.89 0.3 0.3 0.01% BOWNESS COMMON 803.29 26.5 26.5 3.30% BOX MINE 58.74 0.2 0.2 0.39% BRADENHAM WOODS, PARK WOOD & THE COPPICE 134.93 0.0 0.0 0.01% BRAMSHOTT AND LUDSHOTT COMMONS 371.14 0.3 102.2 102.5 27.61% BRATTON DOWNS 400.08 119.1 44.7 0.2 0.0 164.1 41.01% BRAUNTON BURROWS 1,339.74 1.2 589.8 9.0 600.0 44.78% BRECKLAND FARMLAND 13,392.58 1,552.4 1,552.4 11.59% BRECKLAND FOREST 18,126.08 462.5 462.5 2.55% BRIDGHAM & BRETTENHAM HEATHS 441.70 200.9 200.9 45.48% BROADMOOR TO BAGSHOT WOODS AND HEATHS 1,696.33 81.2 495.7 576.9 34.01% BROWNDOWN 66.47 61.4 61.4 92.36% BROXHEAD AND KINGSLEY COMMONS -
7817 Sustainable Seed Source Report
Sustainable Seed Source Project Phase 2 Commissioned and funded by the Woodland Trust Sustainable Seed Source Project Phase 2 K Russell Consulting Ltd On behalf of Future Trees Trust October 2015 Commissioned and funded by the Woodland Trust Contents 1. Foreword 2 2. Executive summary 3 3. Objectives, methods and results 4 4. Next steps 11 5. Acknowledgements 11 Appendix 1: Data collection form 12 Appendix 2: Tree species distribution maps 16 6. Tables showing results 26 1 Sustainable Seed Source Project Phase 2 1. Foreword Trees and woodland in the UK face a growing number of It is of course the case that in the past seed, other threats from pests and pathogens, as well as the need reproductive material and tree transplants have been to adapt to a changing climate. These challenges require imported from elsewhere in Europe and are part of UK a range of responses from government and its agencies, woods. However, by collecting seed from trees now woodland owners and forest managers. growing in the UK, and thus subjected to the selection pressure of UK conditions and climate change within the Where it is possible to use natural regeneration, this often UK, we can work towards seed which is better adapted provides the best opportunity for adaptive woodland and free from imported pests and pathogens. management. However, in many cases the regeneration of existing woodland and the expansion of trees and Long term resilience within tree species is likely to woodland in the UK for commercial timber production, be greatest where there is good intraspecific genetic woodland conservation and a range of other ecosystem diversity with the potential for adaptive responses to functions, depends on a reliable and secure source of a change.