An Analysis of Selected Community Green Building Programs in Five

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Analysis of Selected Community Green Building Programs in Five An Analysis of Selected Community Green Building Programs in Five Southeastern States Conducted by the Southeast Watershed Forum and University of Georgia River Basin Center On behalf of the Southeast Smart Growth Network Written and edited by Christine Olsenius Support provided by The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Acknowledgements The development of this research was a collaborative effort between the Southeast Watershed Forum, The University of Georgia River Basin Center, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 office and community leaders in five southeastern states. At EPA, a special thanks is in order to Karen Bandhauer, who provided early guidance on the research focus for this project. In addition, Steve Smith and Suganthi Simon helped in the final review and fine-tuning of this report. We would like to acknowledge Laurie Fowler, Associate Dean of the Odum School of Ecology, and Director of Policy at the University of Georgia River Basin Center, for her early support of this project. From the University of Georgia, we would like to thank Katie Sheehan, Anne Marie Pippin, Becky Gabelman, Alan Jones and John Templeton for their research work. Additional research and writing of the case studies was done by Amble Johnson, Alex Robertson, Nicole Babcock, Matt Brigman, Brad Brizendine and Denise Yen. Thanks also to the more than 20 local community leaders who helped immensely in reviewing and editing their respective case studies. Jay Scott Pippin deserves special thanks for coordinating and editing the research. Christine Olsenius and Jane Fowler of the Southeast Watershed Forum synthesized and analyzed all the research data and Christine wrote much of the final report. Copyright@ 2012 Southeast Watershed Forum This program was funded by EPA Cooperative Agreement: PI95470911 Design by Sara Martin table of contents Executive Summary 01 Approaches that Enhance Successful Green Building Programs What More is Needed to Enhance Green Building Programs Introduction & Project Overview 06 Selected Highlights from Green Building Research 13 Selected Case Studies by State 22 Appendix: Matrix of Green Best Management Practices 88 Appendix: Selected Research on Community Green Building Practices 90 AN ANALYSIS OF SELECTED COMMUNITY GREEN BUILDING PROGRAMS executive Southeastern “ communities have a history of learning from summary one another, so it is hoped PROJECT OVERVIEW that this review of green In 2010, a consortium of over 20 universities, organizations and agencies came building approaches together to form an association called the Southeast Smart Growth Network (Net- and programs will work). The Network is designed to be a collaborative effort to enhance the ability of inspire communities to member organizations to assist southeastern communities in implementing smart craft similar programs growth policies and practices. The goal is to share information and best practices on tailored to their own smart growth activities in southeastern states to enhance efforts in community train- “ ing, public education and green building. needs, politics and The Network was interested in identifying common features and practices of lo- demographics. cal and state government efforts that support green building programs. Several Network members joined together in the development of this research project to review selected green building programs, policies and incentives in five south- eastern states where some of the most intense activity has been occurring. These states included Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina and Tennessee. The Network members participating in this research effort were the Southeast Water- Planners, public shed Forum, University of Georgia River Basin Center and the Georgia Department “ works staff, engineers, of Community Affairs. The objective was to gather a regional snapshot of existing green building programs, the kind of incentives used to encourage them and the developers, construction cost savings being realized. companies, and The focus is on green building, because there are widely acknowledged benefits stormwater and utility from green building practices in three general areas. Green building creates healthier managers all have homes and workplaces by encouraging the use of safer materials. Green building a stake in building saves on operating costs by reducing heat loss, reducing energy and water use and encouraging the use of renewable energy sources, like solar or geothermal. And greener communities Green building protects the environment through low impact development prac- where the cost of tices and careful siting of buildings to better preserve trees, habitat, nearby water community services and resources. infrastructure remain Southeastern communities have a history of learning from one another, so it is sustainable, where local hoped that this review of green building approaches and programs will inspire communities to craft similar programs tailored to their own needs, politics and market value and quality demographics. This report certainly showcases a variety of approaches to en- of life remains high and couraging green building practices. While various themes and approaches were where communities seen in the communities reviewed, it was evident that each community had are equipped to better their own rationale, incentives, and priorities for implementing green building face economic and programs. “ environmental challenges This study is designed to provide information that will inspire or encourage other communities to see the benefits from implementing sustainable building prac- in the years ahead. tices. While the Network members are an audience for this report, the prime audience is southeastern communities and developers who need to understand the economic and environmental benefits from green building practices. Plan- ners, public works staff, engineers, developers, construction companies, and SOUTHEAST WATERSHED FORUM AND UGA RIVER BASIN CENTER | 1 AN ANALYSIS OF SELECTED COMMUNITY GREEN BUILDING PROGRAMS stormwater and utility managers all have a stake in building greener communi- ties where the cost of community services and infrastructure remain sustain- able, where local market value and quality of life remains high and where com- munities are equipped to better face economic and environmental challenges in the years ahead. REPORT METHODOLOGY Much of the framework for this report was taken from EPA’s Sustainable Design and Green Building Toolkit for Local Communities. The Toolkit offers an assessment process for communities to review their green building practices in such areas as; building materials, materials reuse and recycling, indoor air quality, water and energy efficiency, transportation and green site design and land use. So the term, “green building”, as used in this report, refers to a wide range of activities that in- clude sustainable site design and land use development; recycling building materials and construction waste; energy conservation and air quality; water conservation and water quality; promoting the use of environmentally-safe products, and encouraging green power generation and use. While the research on green building programs focused on these practices, we tried to find integrated approaches that covered not just the building process, but the building site design and its placement within the natural setting. While this report is not an exhaustive review of every county or city program, researchers looked at approximately 74 communities in five states with green building programs. From the 74 communities reviewed, about 60 communities provided enough specific information for comparison. From this group, 16 com- munity case studies were developed for this report. The case studies offered an opportunity to analyze city or county green building programs in greater depth to learn more about how they were formed and implemented and what led to their success. The communities were chosen for geographical balance and for their variety of approaches to green building practices. Information was sought in four main areas of activity: 1. The type of green building policies being developed, 2. The process and motivation for developing those programs, 3. The type of incentive programs being used to encourage green building, and 4. The cost effectiveness of green building programs. It is hoped that the analysis of green building requirements, ordinances, cost ef- fectiveness and incentives in selected communities will encourage the replication of such programs in other southeastern communities. In addition, the information and community case studies will provide data on: • The ways communities are providing incentives for energy and water efficiency in public, residential and commercial buildings and new construction, • The ways communities are providing incentives for energy and water efficiency in their overall operation and maintenance, • The ways that communities are reducing waste and increasing efficiency in construction and development to enhance resource conservation, SOUTHEAST WATERSHED FORUM AND UGA RIVER BASIN CENTER | 2 AN ANALYSIS OF SELECTED COMMUNITY GREEN BUILDING PROGRAMS • Information on the cost of implementing green building programs, Specific planning guidance in how to implement green building programs, • Many communities see • Specific ordinances, practices or incentives to promote to other the need to make long communities. “ term investments in water This report contains 16 case studies on community green building
Recommended publications
  • BUILDING Bridges to a Better Economy Viewfinder Ll 2007 Fa Eastthe Magazine of East Carolina University
    2007 LL fa EastThe Magazine of easT Carolina UniversiTy BUILDING BrIDGes to a better economy vIewfINDer 2007 LL fa EastThe Magazine of easT Carolina UniversiTy 12 feaTUres BUilDing BriDges 12 Creating more jobs is the core of the university’s newBy Steve focus Tuttle on economic development. From planning a new bridge to the Outer Banks to striking new partnerships with relocating companies, ECU is helping the region traverse troubled waters. TUrning The PAGE 18 Shirley Carraway ’75 ’85 ’00 rose steadily in her careerBy Suzanne in education Wood from teacher to principal to superintendent. “I’ve probably changed my job every four or five years,” she says. 18 22 “I’m one of those people who like a challenge.” TeaChing sTUDenTs To SERVE 22 Professor Reginald Watson ’91 is determined toBy walkLeanne the E. walk,Smith not just talk the talk, about the importance of faculty and students connecting with the community. “We need to keep our feet in the world outside this campus,” he says. FAMILY feUD 26 As another football game with N.C. State ominouslyBy Bethany Bradsher approaches, Skip Holtz is downplaying the importance of the contest. And just as predictably, most East Carolina fans are ignoring him. DeParTMeNTs froM oUr reaDers 3 The eCU rePorT 4 26 FALL arTs CalenDar 10 BookworMs PiraTe naTion Dowdy student stores stocks books 34 for about 3,500 different courses and expects to move about one million textbooks into the hands of students during the hectic first CLASS noTes weeks of fall semester. Jennifer Coggins and Dwayne 37 Murphy are among several students who worked this summer unpacking and cataloging thousands of boxes of new books.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Butterflies in My Stomach
    Becoming-Roller Derby: Women, Sport, and the Affects of Power Author Pavlidis, Adele Published 2013 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Department of Tourism, Sport and Hotel Management DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/1342 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366936 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Becoming-Roller Derby: Women, Sport, and the Affects of Power Adele Pavlidis BA (Hons) Department of Tourism, Sport and Hotel Management (Gold Coast, Australia) Griffith Business School Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2013 ii Abstract This project is centrally concerned with (re)writing and (re)conceptualising a feminist cultural imaginary for sport and physical culture. Focusing on roller derby as a ‘new’ sport played predominantly by women, I examine the various affects in circulation, both on and off the track, and what these affects do. Thinking through affects, I highlight the processes of transformation that women undergo through roller derby and the challenges of sustaining this kind of cultural space into the future. In doing so, I have written of women in their multiplicity, drawing on post-structural conceptualisations of subjectivity and recent socio-cultural theorising of affects. I acknowledge the challenges of women coming together to pursue a shared goal, yet the project is a hopeful one, in which I offer alternatives to reductionist thinking or biological determinism. Conceptualisations of sport and leisure as ‘empowering’ or necessarily ‘resistant’ for women are questioned throughout this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is Davidson College
    General Information Table of Contents 2009 Schedule Athletic Honors . .IBC Davidson College . .17-19 Jan. 23 vs. Boston University 1 5:00 Davidson Quick Facts . .1 Surrounding Area . .20-21 24 at Brown 2:00 2009 Schedule . .1 Strength & Conditioning 22-23 25 at Boston College 11:00 a.m. Athletic Facilities . .24-25 2009 Roster/Team Photo . .2 Feb. 1 #69 Radford 1:00 Academics . .26-27 2009 Outlook . .3 7 at #55 South Carolina 10:00 a.m. Player Profiles . .4-7 Student Life . .28-29 10 Gardner-Webb 4:00 Class of 2008 . .8 Athletic Directory . .30-31 14 USC Upstate 10:00 a.m. Head Coach Barrett . .9 Conference Affiliations . .32 27 Richmond TBA This is Davidson . .IFC Assistant Coach . .9 Mar. 1 at Samford * 12:00 2008 Statistics/Results . .10 3 at Chattanooga * 2:30 2009 Opponents . .12 12 Indiana State 2:30 Year-By-Year Results . .13-15 21 at #70 Furman * 1:30 Honors & Awards . .16 23 U. of Illinois at Chicago 2:00 28 UNC Greensboro * 1:00 2009 M. TENNIS QUICK FACTS Apr. 1 Elon * 3:00 4 at College of Charleston * 1:00 General Information 5 at Georgia Southern * 12:00 8 Wofford * 3:00 School Name . .Davidson College 10 Charlotte 3:00 Location . .Davidson, N.C. 11 at The Citadel * 11:00 a.m. Founded . .1837 16 Appalachian State * (Senior Day) 2:30 Enrollment . .1,700 Nickname . .Wildcats Southern Conference Tournament - Elon, N.C. School Colors . .Red (PMS 186) and Black Nov. 23-26 SoCon Tournament TBD Conference . .Southern Affiliation .
    [Show full text]
  • The New Country Doctors How ECU Health Care Grads Are Caring for Small-Town Families VIEWFINDER 7 WINTER 200 ETHE Magazinea of EAST Carolinas Universityt
    7 WINTER 200 ETHE MAGAZINEa OF EAST CAROLINAs UNIVERSITYt The New Country Doctors How ECU health care grads are caring for small-town families VIEWFINDER 7 WINTER 200 ETHE MAGAZINEa OF EAST CAROLINAs UNIVERSITYt F E A T U R E S THE NEW COUNTRY DOCTORS 12 18 12 The doctors, nurses and allied health care prByof Steessionalsve Row that ECU has sent into eastern North Carolina are improving lives and providing the “boots on the ground” that experts say are the critical front line of health care. THE MISCAST MARTYR OF STUDENT RIGHTS 18 Robert Thonen, the conservative editor of the studentBy Steve Tnewspaperuttle who got himself kicked out of college over a four-letter word, was an unlikely ! gure to be at center stage during the protests that shook ECU 35 years ago. FOOD FOR THOUGHT 24 Remember the free spaghetti dinners at the BaptistBy Betha nStudenty Bradsh eUnion?r They’re still going, and students still are seeking out a safe haven from the wild side of campus life. BUILDING THE TRIANGLE 28 Charles Hayes, a member of the small but powerful gByroup Steve that Tuttle has propelled North Carolina’s economy into the 21st century, doesn’t run an employment agency, but he helped 40,000 people ! nd jobs in the past year. BANANAS OVER BASKETBALL 24 32 They were born the night ECU upset No. 9 MarBy Bethanquettey Br inadsher bask etball, and four years later the Minges Maniacs are still giving the Pirates a home-court advantage. D E P A R T M E N T S FROM OUR READERS 3 THE ECU REPORT 4 32 Petite Pirates and a pony As fl oats fi lled with students FROM THE CLASSROOM rolled down Fifth Street during the 36 Homecoming parade, two petite Pirates showed their excitement by sharing a hug with a pony CLASS NOTES named Lightning.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 9, 2016 NEW ISSUE RATINGS: S&P: AAA FULL BOOK-ENTRY - ONLY Moody’s: Aa1 Fitch: AA+ (See “MISCELLANEOUS – Ratings” herein) In the opinion of Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Bond Counsel, under existing law (1) assuming compliance by the City with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), interest on the 2016A Bonds (a) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and (b) is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, (2) interest on the 2016B Bonds is taxable as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes, and (3) interest on the 2016 Bonds is exempt from State of North Carolina income taxation. See “TAX TREATMENT” herein. $129,735,000* CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA $118,400,000* $11,335,000* Water and Sewer System Taxable Water and Sewer System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A Series 2016B Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown below The City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina Water and Sewer System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A (the “2016A Bonds”) and its Taxable Water and Sewer System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B (the “2016B Bonds” and collectively with the 2016A Bonds, the “2016 Bonds”) are issuable as fully registered bonds. The 2016 Bonds are being issued for the purpose of (1) refunding the City’s Water and Sewer System Revenue and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2007A, maturing on and after June 1, 2018, (2) refunding the City’s Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2009, maturing on and after June 1, 2020, (3) refunding the City’s Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, maturing on and after June 1, 2021 and (4) paying the costs of issuing the 2016 Bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina's Best Emerging Poets an Anthology
    North Carolina’s Best Emerging Poets An Anthology Compiled and Edited by Z Publishing House 2017 Z Publishing Books edition 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Z Publishing, LLC Published in the United States of America All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher or of the author of the relevant work. Z Publishing, LLC, is not responsible for content and accuracy of the links, web addresses, and emails provided in the author biography index. Visit our website: www.zpublishinghouse.com 2 Table of Contents Foreword, or How This Series Came to Be .................................................. 7 Thoughts, Reflections, and Stream of Consciousness .................................. 9 Female Anger (Sara-Rose Bockian) ....................................................... 10 Field Crickets (Britt DiBartolo) .............................................................. 11 The Seams of Life (Andy I) .................................................................... 12 June, July (Emily Haaksma) .................................................................. 13 Coffee Arabica (Threa Almontaser) ...................................................... 14 Crowds (Violetta Nikitina) .................................................................... 16 Cosmos (Andrew Teague McCollister) .................................................. 17 Lies (Taryn Felton) ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Baseball Fact Book
    Eric Tyler 2017 BASEBALL FACT BOOK Travis Watkins Evan Kruczynski Keith LeClair Head Coach (1997-2002) Introduction Pronounciation Guide .................................................32 Single-Season Individual Pitching Records ..............98 Schedule ........................................................................2 Pirate Birthdays/Fun Facts .........................................33 Career Individual Pitching Records ...........................99 General Information & Quick Facts ..............................3 Player Profiles ........................................................34-61 Single-Season/Career Fielding Records ..................100 Media Guidelines.......................................................4-5 Pirates In the Community ..........................................62 Single Game Records ................................................100 Staff Directory ...............................................................6 Freshman Hitting Records .........................................101 Primary Media Outlets ..................................................7 2017 Opponents Freshman Pitching Records .......................................101 Getting to Greenville ....................................................8 2017 Opponents .....................................................64-69 Miscellaneous Records ...............................................102 Lodging, Dining & Transportation ...............................9 Record Vs. All-Time Opponents .................................70 Strength
    [Show full text]
  • Readings in the History of the Soil Conservation Service
    United States Department of Agriculture Readings in the Soil Conservation Service History of the Soil Conservation Service Economics and Social Sciences Division, NHQ Historical Notes Number 1 Introduction The articles in this volume relate in one way or another to the history of the Soil Conservation Service. Collectively, the articles do not constitute a comprehensive history of SCS, but do give some sense of the breadth and diversity of SCS's missions and operations. They range from articles published in scholarly journals to items such as "Soil Conservation: A Historical Note," which has been distributed internally as a means of briefly explaining the administrative and legislative history of SCS. To answer reference requests I have made reprints of the published articles and periodically made copies of some of the unpublished items. Having the materials together in a volume is a very convenient way to satisfy these requests in a timely manner. Also, since some of these articles were distributed to SCS field offices, many new employees have joined the Service. I wanted to take the opportunity to reach them. SCS employees are the main audience. We have produced this volume in the rather unadorned and inexpensive manner so that we can distribute the volume widely and have it available for training sessions and other purposes. Also we can readily add articles in the future. If anyone should wish to quote or cite any of the published articles, please use the citations provided at the beginning of the article. For other articles please cite this publication. Steven Phillips, a graduate student in history at Georgetown University and a 1992 summer intern here with SCS, converted the articles to this uniform format, and is hereby thanked for his very professional efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University Volume 50 (2018)
    Gardner-Webb University Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University The Broad River Review Literary Societies and Publications 2018 Volume 50 (2018) C.V. Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/brreview Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, Fiction Commons, Nonfiction Commons, and the Poetry Commons Recommended Citation Davis, C.V., "Volume 50 (2018)" (2018). The Broad River Review. 17. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/brreview/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Literary Societies and Publications at Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Broad River Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BROAD RIVER REVIEW Volume 50 2018 The Literary Review of Gardner-Webb University Boiling Springs, North Carolina T HE B ROAD R IVER R EVIEW ASSOCIATE EDITORS Summer Byers Emily Eidson Anna Francis Aaron Hilton Hannah Roberts Christian Vaughan Kate Vriesema The Broad River Review is published annually by the Department of English Language and Literature at Gardner-Webb University in Boiling Springs, North Carolina. Upon request, this publication can be provided in an alternate format by calling (704) 406-4414. Acknowledgements Cover Photo: “Blue Door” by Rollin Jewett, 2018 Ron Rash, “Watauga County: 1962” in Waking Ron Rash, “At Reid Hartley’s Junkyard” in Raising the Dead Estefania Acquaviva, “Calle La Rueda” in Typishly Olaf Kroneman, “Fighting to Heal” in The Intima Gary Beck, “Purchase Power II” in The Magnolia Review Broad River Review, v.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University Volume 49 (2017)
    Gardner-Webb University Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University The Broad River Review Literary Societies and Publications 2017 Volume 49 (2017) C.V. Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/brreview Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, Fiction Commons, Nonfiction Commons, and the Poetry Commons Recommended Citation Davis, C.V., "Volume 49 (2017)" (2017). The Broad River Review. 16. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/brreview/16 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Literary Societies and Publications at Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Broad River Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BROAD RIVER REVIEW Volume 49 2017 The Literary Review of Gardner-Webb University Boiling Springs, North Carolina T HE B ROAD R IVER R EVIEW ASSOCIATE EDITORS Jasmine Case Brianna Crump Kirsten Daley Jeffrey Day Callista Eckert Lizzie Erhartic Jonathan Goldenberg Amanda Harnish Kallie Ingle Mallory Moore Marsden Murray Brooke Penley Joseph Rash Hannah Ray Hayley Sowell Brandon Tolley The Broad River Review is published annually by the Department of English Language and Literature at Gardner-Webb University in Boiling Springs, North Carolina. Upon request, this publication can be provided in an alternate format by calling (704) 406-4414. Acknowledgements Cover Photo: “Autumn is Calling” by Ashley Koch, 2017 Broad River Review, v. 49, 2017 [email protected] www.broadriverreview.org CONTENTS EDITORS’ NOTE vi THE RASH AWARD IN FICTION Linda Heuring, Red Light, Green Light 8 THE RASH AWARD IN POETRY Priscilla Webster-Williams Occupational Therapy at a TB Sanitarium, 1952 19 J.
    [Show full text]
  • ARA Management, Employees Disagree
    - t- LD FRIDAY, OCTOBER WAKE FoREST UNIVERSITY, WINSTON-SALEM, NoRTH CAROLINA 26, 1990 (Volunteers ARA Management, Provide Employees Disagree td Halloween Bv Scorr GRANT worlcer can leave at any time." · He said the building was constructed in the '50s LlSA Sl'oNCLER -DiD GoLD AND BU\CK REPoRTER 0u> CloUl AND IJu.CK RI!PoR'1111l when theft may not have been as great a problem_as I A letter by an ARA employee printed in the Old it is today. He said he will try to have somt:?ne w1th Disadvantagedcbildrenwhomight Gold and Black Oct. 19 has upset and confused a key to the gate available as-often as possible. riot enjoy a safe Halloween in their · ARA management, while generating support Putnam said his intent was to avoid placing locks o\vn neighbo~oods will find tricks among many ARA woikers. · · on individual doors. He said it was considered a and treats atWake Forest Tuesday. "I found the letter to be quite disconcerting. I am decision beneficial to the employees. Putnam said · 7·Proj~ PUmpkin, a programspon" not aware that I have rruide any decisions based on the racist implications in the letter was a very per­ so~·by the Volunteer Cmp;_ will personal likes or dislikes," said Barry Halliday, the sonal insult and had no basis. He said there is not any bi.ing about 250 children to Luter and director of food service. instance where he dealt with someone unfairly. Bilbcock Residence Halls from3:45 Executive Chef Craig Putnam absorbed the most Putnam said the charge involving the firing of to5:45 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Wake Forest Demon Deacons Florida State Seminoles
    MARCH 9-10, 2018 | WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. | DAVID F. COUCH BALLPARK | #GoDeacs GAME DETAILS SCHEDULE & RESULTS Event Info FEBRUARY Head Coach: Tom Walter Location ....Winston-Salem, N.C. 16 GEORGETOWN W, 7-2 WAKE FOREST Season: 9th Venue ..... David F. Couch Ballpark 17 NAVY L, 2-5 Home Record: 4-4 Capacity .................................3,823 18 GARDNER-WEBB ACCN Extra W, 8-4 DEMON DEACONS Away Record: 1-4 Surface ............................ AstroTurf GARDNER-WEBB ACCN Extra L, 3-6 Record: 5-8 | ACC: 0-0 National Rank: NR TV .................. ACC Network Extra 20 at Davidson L, 1-3 Series History 23 at Santa Clara L, 0-2 Head Coach: Mike Martin 24 at Santa Clara L, 6-7 (14) Overall ............. FSU leads, 89-27 FLORIDA STATE Season: 39th 25 at Santa Clara W, 3-1 Walter vs. FSU ...................... 8-16 SEMINOLES Home Record: 12-0 28 UNCG ACCN Extra L, 5-11 Away Record: 1-0 Last Meeting .............5/14/2017 MARCH Record: 13-0 | ACC: 0-0 National Rank: 3 (BA)/4 (D1) Result .................WF 10, at FSU 9 2 UMASS LOWELL ACCN Extra W, 8-1 3 UMASS LOWELL ACCN Extra L, 3-5 PROBABLE PITCHERS 4 UMASS LOWELL ACCN Extra W, 14-7 7 at #24 Coastal Carolina L, 3-19 Friday, 9:00 Saturday, 4:00 Sunday, 3:00 9 #3 FLORIDA ST.* ACCN Extra 6:00 RHP Griffin Roberts (Jr., 2-1, 2.21 ERA) RHP Colin Peluse (So., 2-0, 3.00 ERA) RHP Morgan McSweeney (So., 0-1, 3.38 ERA) 10 #3 FLORIDA ST.* ACCN Extra 2:00 VS VS VS #3 FLORIDA ST.* ACCN Extra 6:00 RHP Cole Sands (Jr., 3-0, 2.25 ERA) LHP Drew Parrish (So., 1-0, 1.06 ERA) LHP Austin Pollock (Fr., 2-0, 0.56 ERA) 13 vs.
    [Show full text]