Connotations 10.2-3 (2000/2001)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Drama at the Courts of Queen Henrietta Maria'
H-Albion Campbell on Britland, 'Drama at the Courts of Queen Henrietta Maria' Review published on Saturday, September 1, 2007 Karen Britland. Drama at the Courts of Queen Henrietta Maria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. ix + 292 pp. $85.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-521-84797-1. Reviewed by Julie Campbell (Department of English, Eastern Illinois University) Published on H- Albion (September, 2007) Reading Religio-Political Visions in Caroline Court Entertainments Considering the court entertainments associated with Henrietta Maria, queen consort to Charles I, from the wedding ballets performed for the royal couple in 1624 to the entertainments at the French court during her exile, Karen Britland employs carefully researched close readings to counter the long-standing image of Henrietta Maria as vain and frivolous. Britland especially takes issue with Alison Plowden's assertion in Henrietta Maria (2001) that the queen consort "was simply not interested in affairs of state" (quoted, p. 1). In the process, Britland demonstrates, in intriguing detail, how the allegories of the sumptuous Caroline court entertainments illustrate Henrietta Maria's and Charles's religious and political goals. Critical considerations that inform Britland's study are as follows: she strongly asserts that Henrietta Maria had a socio-religious role at the English court mandated by her mother, Marie de Médicis, that she was to protect English Catholics and be merciful to Protestants, so that, by her example, they (including her husband) would wish to convert. In the same vein, Henrietta Maria was to embody the notion of a "peaceweaver," Britland's term for a royal female peacemaker who traveled between courts and whose role it was to use her fertility, her deportment, and her rhetoric to negotiate between national powers. -
Roy Strong (RS)
Roy Strong (RS) This archive collection has not yet been catalogued. The material remains unsorted and in its original order. File titles given are those assigned by Roy Strong. Box numbers have been allocated by the Centre. If you wish to consult any material from this collection, please specify the box number and file title (where applicable). Please note that it is only possible to request 10 files per retrieval. Access will be provided in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998. Full details relating to access to the Centre’s collections can be found here: http://www.paul-mellon-centre.ac.uk/23/ The material in this archive comprises correspondence, images, articles, research notes, photocopies of published & unpublished material. Box number Box title File title Description of material Extent Covering (if applicable). Dates Sequence 1: Inigo Jones Photographs of prints and sketches (some mounted) by Inigo Jones of designs for masques relating compiled and collected by Strong during the course of his work for the publication: Orgel S. & Strong R., (1973) Inigo Jones: the theatre of the Stuart Court. Sotheby Parke Bernet. A copy of this text can be found in the PMC library 1 Jones – I -Cecil House 1607 6 files & 2 loose Unknown c.1610 photographs Blackness; Queens; Barriers; Oberon; Lords -Lord Hayes Masque 1607 -Queens 1609 -Barriers 1610 -Oberon 1611 -Lords Masque 1613 2 Jones – II -Misc. C. 1615 23 files & 2 Vision of delight; to loose Somerset House c.1629/30 photographs -Tilt or Barriers c. 1618 -Pleasure reconciled to virtue 1618 -Unknown Masque 1619 -Unknown play at Somerset House 1619-20 -Antimasquers c.1620 -Anti-masquers c. -
'Youthful Revels, Masks, and Courtly Sights'
‘Youthful Revels, Masks, and Courtly Sights’: an introductory study of the revels within the Stuart masque Anne Daye Invocation designated a social occasion shaped by art. Not only might a Although at heart the masque is an entertainment of dancing, ball, a game or a play be conducted in an orderly fashion, but scholarship in this century has concentrated on the literary a sequence of such events might be linked by a single and design elements. An outstanding body of scholarship has conception or device to make an artistic whole. This kind of illuminated the artistic, intellectual and political importance revel might be enacted for a particular celebration. It required of the Stuart court masques, paying testimony to the complex leisure for the revel to unfold, therefore certain seasons of the cultural achievement of their makers. The dance elements year were more conducive to this activity. The Christmas have been marginalised in the discussion. This is chiefly a season in particular was the opportunity for such activity, as consequence of the much smaller body of evidence left winter enforced idleness, whilst Christ’s birth was a pretext behind, but also because scholarly work on seventeenth for celebration for non-Puritan Christians. A revel provided century dance is a comparatively recent development. How- a release from the cares of the world, when normal duties and ever, fresh historical research, including the reconstruction responsibilities were suspended, and when the imagination of dances, is now leading to a firmer grasp of the nature of could be engaged creatively. The spirit of a winter revel is dancing at the time of the masques. -
Shakespeare and Religion Chronology 1600-1624 and Post Shakespeare 1625-1799 Including American Contexts Continental Contexts Irish Contexts
1 Shakespeare and Religion Chronology 1600-1624 and Post Shakespeare 1625-1799 Including American Contexts Continental Contexts Irish Contexts Home Page: Shakespeare and Religion Chronology by Dennis Taylor, Boston College Unedited notes, Revised March, 2013 **1600** Essex opens Essex house to discontents, proposes to certain theologians the question whether an ill-advised sovereign could be required to govern according to law, sends professions of attachment to James; the conspirators meet at Drury House, Southampton's residence, to discuss the succession, and promise support to James;Essex assembles his men to proceed to the Queen-- ”buoyed up with the belief in his own popularity, and the knowledge that a few years before the duke of Guise in similar circumstances, had, with the aid of the Parisians, successfully braved the authority of his sovereign” (Lingard); diverted by Sir Edward Coke who arrived and “accused Essex of hypocrisy and irreligion, because, while he pretended to be a Protestant, he had promised toleration to Blount, his father-in-law, a known Catholic; Essex protested his loyal Protestantism, but also “replied ... that he did not consider it an essential part of the reformed worship to put Catholics to death on account of their religion” (Lingard). He is tried and convicted, but left free. Southampton offers to flee with him to foreign exile, but Essex declines. Essex conspirators include Francis Tresham (son of Sir Thomas Tresham), who became part of Gunpowder plot. Essex had tacitly promised religious toleration to gain support of Catholics and other dissidents. Henry Howard, Earl of Northampton, Essex ally, but opposed the rebellion Anne of Denmark, wife of James VI (married him 1589), possibly converts to Catholicism in this year (or 1601-2). -
Comus a Masque by John Milton
Christ’s College Amateur Dramatic Society presents Comus A masque by John Milton Comus David F. Walton The Lady Mary-Ellen Lynall The attendant Spirit Jenni Mackenzie Elder Brother Ed Rowett Younger Brother Ned Stuart-Smith Sabrina the Nymph Olivia Marshall Dancers Rachel Thomas Charlotte Verrill Maria Pritchard Shu-Pin Oei Emma Rhule Helen Ivory Director Annilese Miskimmon Assistant Director Sarah Blisset Production Designer Lachlan Goudie Producer Natalie Fast Assistant Producer Mary Hughes Musical Director Ned Allen Assistant Musical Director Richard Bates Costume Designer Beth Sims Choreographer Kyra Cornwall Externals Liaison Hannah Crawforth The Marlowe Society presents Comus A reply by John Kinsella Comus David Brown The Lady Amanda Palin The attendant Spirit Helen Duff Elder Brother Sam Pallis Younger Brother Lowri Amies Sabrina the Nymph Alashiya Gordes Entourage Abigail Rokison Iona Blair Arthur Asseraf Director Simon Godwin Assistant Director Oscar Toeman Designer Lucy Minyo Associate Designer Georgia de Grey Composer Simon Gethin Thomas Music Advisor Jeremy Thurlow Choreographer Vikki Le May Lighting Designer Benjamin Sehovic Technical Director Adam Wood Stage Manager Alexandra Hepburn Producer Pascal Porcheron Assistant Producer Eve Rosato Special thanks to: Dr. Richard Axton for overseeing the CADS production. Hannah Crawforth for liaising between and co-ordinating the two productions. Helen Mort and the Christ’s College Alumni Office. Tim Cooper (Wolfson Theatre, Churchill) Tony Weaver, David King, John Linford and Christ’s College Maintenance Department. Programme edited by David Parry. The college had barely started planning celebrations for the 400th anniversary of John Milton’s birth when it got wind of a bold initiative by the Marlowe Society. -
Music in English Renaissance Drama
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Music Arts and Humanities 1968 Music in English Renaissance Drama John H. Long Greensboro College Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Long, John H., "Music in English Renaissance Drama" (1968). Music. 2. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_music/2 MUSIC IN ENGLISH RENAISSANCE DRAMA This page intentionally left blank MUSIC IN ENGLISH RENAISSANCE DRAMA CONTRIBUTORS Nan Cooke Carpenter Ernest Brennecke Ian Spink R. W. Ingram MacDonald Emslie Willa McClung Evans Vincent Duckles EDITED BY John H. Long University of Kentucky Press Lexington 1968 Copyright © 1968 University of Kentucky Press Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 68-12969 INTRODUCTION It is the purpose of this volume to present some significant examples of the use of music in English dramatic and semidramatic works composed and presented between the years 1550 and 1650, a span of a century which for this limited purpose shall serve as a temporal definition of the English Renaissance. The bulk of scholarship devoted to the subject in the past has been limited largely to the works of one playwright, Shakespeare, and to one semidramatic form, the court masque. Monumental as Shakespeare was and is, and magnificent as the court masques were, they did not encompass completely the versatility with which music was employed for dramatic purposes during the period, in the works of lesser play wrights or in the elaborate "entertainments," the interludes, the pageants, the folk-plays, and other more-or-less dramatic productions that, in intent and practice, merged one into another to defy formal categorization. -
The Impact of the Civil War and Interregnum on English Music, C.1640 to C.1660
"These Sad, Distracted Tymes" The Impact of the Civil War and Interregnum on English Music, c.1640 to c.1660 by Bronwyn Irene Ellis B.A. (Hons.); P.G. Dip. Ed.; A. Mus. A. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy degree, University of Tasmania June 2004 Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for a degree or diploma by this university or any other institution except by way of background information that has been duly acknowledged in the thesis. To the best of my knowledge and belief, it incorporates no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. 10-06-a0:74. Bronwyn Ellis Date Statement of Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. egAcd.n.sia_ Bronwyn Ellis Date Abstract The music of mid-seventeenth-century England, and particularly of the Civil War and Interregnum, is a period frequently overlooked or misconstrued by musicology. The powerful image of the 1640s and 1650s as two decades of artistic desolation under the harsh administration of an oppressive religious regime has impacted heavily on the historiographical perception of its music. The Civil War, Commonwealth and Protectorate undoubtedly altered aspects of English musical culture, whether through the disbanding of the royal musical establishment, restriction of the use of music in worship, or prohibition of stage plays. However, these events and influences must be seen in the context of their time rather than isolated as examples of Puritan aggression. -
Review of the Stuart Court Masque and Political Culture by Martin Butler
Early Theatre 13.1 (2010) Book Reviews Martin Butler. The Stuart Court Masque and Political Culture. Cam- bridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. Pp 447. Martin Butler’s new book explores the court masque under James I and Charles I, covering the period from James’s accession in 1603 until the per- formance of the last Stuart masque (Salmacida Spolia) in 1640. Butler has published widely on Caroline drama and the Stuart court masque and is cur- rently editing, with Ian Donaldson and David Bevington, the forthcoming Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson. Theatre and Crisis, 1632–1642 (Cambridge: CUP), Butler’s 1984 monograph, was crucial to the re-evaluation of received notions of the decadence and frivolity of Caroline drama as it argued for hitherto neglected complexities in the relationships between the different theatres (popular and elite), their frequently overlapping audiences, and contemporary political tensions. In The Stuart Court Masque, Butler is again interested in complicating the political dimensions of a genre that has often been read either as a trivial and self-indulgent art form or as a state propaganda machine designed to glorify the monarch and his court. Butler argues that the Stuart court masques both reflected and helped to shape a continually fluctuating political narrative. As such, the masque can no longer be read as one-dimensional and purely celebratory. Butler adroitly negotiates the difficult terrain of ‘a form in which the transcendent meets the contingent, extravagance tips into redundancy, and the purposeful and pleasurable are locked in indissoluble embrace’ (8–9) by providing a wealth of archival and contextual material in order to situ- ate the masques in particular and specific moments of historical conflict and change. -
The Early Poetic Career of Edmund Waller
Carleton College Carleton Digital Commons Faculty Work English 2006 The Early Poetic Career of Edmund Waller Timothy Raylor Carleton College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.carleton.edu/engl_faculty Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Raylor, Timothy. "The Early Poetic Career of Edmund Waller." Huntington Library Quarterly 59.2 (2006): 239-266. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/hlq.2006.69.2.239. Accessed via Faculty Work. English. Carleton Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.carleton.edu/engl_faculty/2 The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.1525/hlq.2006.69.2.239 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English at Carleton Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Work by an authorized administrator of Carleton Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Early Poetic Career of Edmund Waller Timothy Raylor ! WHEN AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES did Edmund Waller (1606–1687) first emerge as an English poet? The question is obviously germane to our understand- ing of the career of a historically important, if currently rather neglected, seventeenth- century poet; it is also, given the prominence accorded to Waller in standard accounts of the rise of English neoclassicism and the heroic couplet, a matter of more general literary-historical concern.1 The standard view is that Waller wrote his earliest poems under James I—thus entitling him to the dubious and almost certainly unique distinc- tion of having written poems for the courts of both Jameses and every English ruler in between. -
Sir William Davenant, the Senses, and Royalism in the Seventeenth Century
Abstract Within the last decade, there has been a renewed level of interest in civil war general, writer and theatre proprietor, Sir William Davenant (1606-1668). The field of sensory studies has also flourished in recent years and, over the past two to three decades especially, research into royalism and royalist literature has produced numerous extensive studies. However, scholarship dealing with royalism only provides vague allusions to the place of the senses and sensuality within royalism and royalist literature. Davenant’s work is striking in that it engages both overtly and more subtly with the relationship between the senses, sensuality, royalist identities, and the values accommodated by royalist ideologies. This thesis offers a thorough re-evaluation of Davenant’s writing in relation to the senses, contributing towards a better understanding of the way in which royalists conceptualise their own sensory experiences, and those of others. In turn, this is vital in understanding royalism as a whole and the way in which such concepts contribute towards its varied nature and accommodating ideologies. It also enables a deeper appreciation of the impact of Davenant’s own forms of royalism upon his literary output. My approach builds upon the critical field of sensory studies by considering the way in which royalist identities may influence writers’ approaches to the sensory experience during the seventeenth century. THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD – SCHOOL OF ENGLISH Sir William Davenant, the Senses, and Royalism in the Seventeenth Century A dissertation presented by Kate Louise Gath In fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the subject of English Literature. -
© in This Web Service Cambridge University
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-65040-3 - The Cambridge History of British Theatre: Origins to 1660: Volume 1 Edited by Jane Milling and Peter Thomson Index More information Index Thepage numbers in italic indicate illustrations. Abbots of Misrule 75, 76, 84, 118, 120 improvisation; knaves; parts system; Abell, William (London alderman) 150 professional troupes; sharers Aberdeen 74, 75–6, 80, 85, 118, 123 Actors’ Remonstrance (1644) 447, 464 Abergavenny, Lord ( fl. 1575) 147 actresses 439–40, 476 Abingdon, Oxon 187, , 192 Adam (Anglo-Norman vernacular play) 45–6 Abraham and Isaac (Brome history play) 57 Adam, The Fall of (medieval play) 61 absolutism, royal 381, 401–5 Adams, John (clown) 410 academic and educational drama 123–6 admission, cost of 189–90, 314, 324, 325, 335–8 see also school plays and under Inns of advertising see publicity Court; universities aerial scenes 392 acoustics, Roman theatre 14 see also flying devices acrobats 10, 16, 24, 70 Agricola, Cn. Julius 6, 11 actors 144–52 Alabaster, William; Roxana 303 acting styles and casting 151; see also under Alban, St 19 Armin, Robert; Kemp, Will Albigenses 47 attraction of career 229–30, 244–5 Alcazar, battle of 256 alterations to scripts 162–3, 430 Alenc¸on, Franc¸ois Hercule de Valois, duc d’ in commercial theatre 229–34 251, 260 in court masques 384 ales 62, 65, 121, 182 finances 145, 147, 148, 229–34, 273, 350 Book of Sports permits 185 masterless 146, 147–8 church fund-raising 184–5 patronage see under professional troupes and community spirit 185 person and persona 172, -
William Cavendish's and James Shirley's 'The Varietie'(C.1641).', the Seventeenth Century., 21 (2)
Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 22 August 2007 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Ravelhofer, B. (2006) 'Non-verbal meaning in Caroline private theatre : William Cavendish's and James Shirley's 'The Varietie'(c.1641).', The seventeenth century., 21 (2). pp. 195-214. Further information on publisher's website: http://journals.mup.man.ac.uk/cgi-bin/MUP?COMval=issuekey=SVC21@2 Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Non-Verbal Meaning in Caroline Private Theatre: William Cavendish’s and James Shirley’s The Varietie (c.1641) How did early modern actors convey meaning on stage without speaking? How, apart from their voices, did they express themselves to audiences? In an age when many types of cultural production – such as fashion or dancing – achieved their effects by visual display without the use of words, we should expect non-verbal features to be essential to the action in plays.